Tehran and Istanbul drifting in opposite ways! Turkey arrests dozens in home, office raids

Tehran and Istanbul drifting in opposite ways!

‘A Tale of two cities!’

Foreign Policy ”… Women whipped off head scarves and drivers honked their horns in an emotional release … In far more democratic neighboring Turkey, meanwhile, riot police on Saturday again blasted protestors in Istanbul’s central Taksim Square and a small park nearby with water cannons and tear gas trying to definitively end two weeks of demonstrations that have convulsed the country. Recep Tayyip Erdogan … wanted the area emptied so he could stage a more congenial rally of his own on Sunday, one led by conservative Muslim supporters…”

Turkey arrests dozens in home, office raids

Protesters react angrily as hundreds of Turkish police officers walk on 17 June 2013 on Istikal street in the center of Istanbul. (Photo: AFP – Marco Longari)
Published Tuesday, June 18, 2013
Turkish police arrested dozens of people at their homes and raided two media offices on Tuesday in a coordinated operation across the country to clamp down on nearly three weeks of mass anti-government unrest, lawyers and local reports said.Officers raided the homes of around 90 members of the Socialist Party of the Oppressed (ESP), a small leftist group that has been active in Istanbul’s Gezi Park protest at the center of the nationwide protest movement, the Istanbul bar association said.Police also searched the offices of the Atilim daily and the Etkin news agency, local media outlets linked to the ESP group, the NTV and CNN-Turk television stations reported.

NTV said 30 people were arrested in the capital Ankara and another 13 in the northwestern city of Eskisehir in a police swoop targeting 21 provinces overall.

Under Turkish law, the detainees may be questioned for four days before they are taken to court to be freed or charged.

Turkey has taken a tough stance against the tens of thousands of demonstrators who have been protesting since May 31 against Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan’s Islamic-rooted government, seen as increasingly authoritarian.

The Turkish government warned Monday that it may bring in the army to help quell the protests as two major union federations went on strike over police violence against demonstrators.

Police “will use all their powers” to end the unrest, Deputy Prime Minister Bulent Arinc said in a televised interview. “If this is not enough, we can even utilize the Turkish armed forces in cities.”
Police have used tear gas, water cannon and rubber bullets to quell the demos, leaving thousands injured and four dead.

Tensions soared on Saturday when police stormed the flashpoint Gezi Park to evict protesters, sparking a weekend of heavy clashes.

Demonstrators have since struggled to regroup and the protests appeared to have lost some of their momentum with only sporadic clashes reported.
(AFP)

Obama makes a strategic mistake in Syria and now its “GAME OVER” for the US stragegy for the Middle-East.

Source

In a recent post I wrote the following:

And so once the “shock and awe” phase has failed to produce any signs of shock or of awe – what happens next? (…) an Anglo invasion of Syria might well trigger an influx of Shia volunteers from Iran, Iraq and Lebanon; that would also offer Iran the perfect opportunity to “send in volunteers” (remember that the students who took over the US embassy in Tehran were also ‘volunteer civilian students’ and that the revolutionary government denied having any control over them) (…) consider the following: the fact that the US or NATO cannot send troops hardly means that the Iranians, the Iraqis or Hezbollah could not do that.  In fact, what could the US do if, say, Moqtada al-Sadr decided to send some of his followers to fight the Takfiris in Syria?  Protest and threaten, but there is really nothing much else they could do (…) This is the huge weakness in the US/NATO posture: while the US/NATO/CENTCOM capabilities to engage in a massive bombing and cruise missile strikes are truly formidable, they have nothing else to follow up with.   Everybody in the Middle-East knows that the Americans do not have what it takes to go tow-to-toe against an insurgency.  These are the folks who used B-2 stealth bombers over Afghanistan but who a full decade later failed to even control most of Kabul in daytime.

As is so often the case, the events on the ground actually developed even much faster than I thought. 

I can confirm on the basis of information received from three different sources that the Iranians have begun moving a large military force into SyriaOne of these sources I can quote: Robert Fisk who wrote the article “Iran to Send 4,000 Troops to Aid President Assad Forces in Syria” for the Independent.  There is also evidence of volunteers from Lebanon.

I think that we can safely make the assumption that the 4000 Iranians sent to Syria are just a beginning and that Tehran can send as many

soldiers as needed.  I can also add here that we are not talking about well-meaning civilians here, but highly trained Pasdarsyou can think of them as “the people who trained Hezbollah”.  One of my best sources tells me that this entire operations is closely coordinated with Russian specialists while another source even mentions Russians on the ground with the Iranians.

It therefore appears that Tehran has decided to preempt a US/NATO attack on Syria by moving in forces even before the shooting start.  I have to sincerely say that this is nothing short of a brilliant move as there is nothing at all the Anglo Empire can do to stop this at this point in time and once the full force is in place it will be impossible to target it separately.

I can add here that the idea of sending in “international brigades” has been discussed in specific Russian and Ukrainian military circles, but that it is likely that the Russian authorities want to keep the visible presence of ethnic Russian to a minimum.  What they can do is send it Russian ethnic groups which do not externally appear as Slavs.  I am thinking, believe it or not, of anti-Wahabi Chechens who are fully integrated into the Russian military intelligence service GRU (the Russians already did something similar once in Lebanon).

Both Russian and Iranian sources confirm that the two government are very closely cooperating on this entire operation and that uninterrupted close consultations are taking place.

In the meantime, most Hezbollah units are withdrawn from Syria and repositioned to defend Lebanon from a possible Israeli attack.

Bottom line: it is already becoming clear that Barak Obama made a huge – strategic – mistake with his “crossing the red line” nonsense about a “limited use of chemical weapons” by the government forces.  Obama probably wanted to give the insurgency a better bargaining position for the Geneva II negotiations, but all he succeeded in doing is fundamentally changing the strategic balance on the ground.  It is one thing to fight the Syrian military, it is a qualitatively other one to fight the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps.  By committing these forces already now, the Iranians are sending a chilling message to Washington: “we do not fear you, and our commitment to Syria is open ended”.

As a military analyst specializing in strategic analysis I have to marvel at the superb elegance of the Iranian move because it essentially checkmates the USA’s entire strategic plan for the Middle-East.  When I wrote that there is no way the US would put any boots on the ground, I assumed that they would not dare to do that against the Syrians.  But, at least, some really naive Americans could have hoped that with enough bombing of Syrian civilians (a la Kosovo) the regime would eventually have to give in.  With thousands of Iranian Pasdars on the ground this is categorically not an option.

This development, apparently only noticed by Robert Fisk, is really a game changer.  What this means for the USA/NATO/CENTCOM/Israel/al-Qaeda is this: “GAME OVER!”.

The Russian/Iranian alliance has done what it does best: it has responded asymmetrically to the US moves.  While the entire world was focusing on S-300s deliveries and Russian Navy moves, it essentially negated the entire US strategy by qualitatively changing the facts on the ground before the US could even react.

US options at this point are extremely limited.  Yes, it can still engage in an orgy of civilian killings just to punish the Syrians and prevent elections.  It can also denounce the Iranian intervention, but since the entire planet by now knows that the insurgency is largely foreign and supported by the USA’s own admission (!), this would be rather hollow.  It can also do the wise thing and strenuously look away from the Iranian presence on the ground and pretend like nothing happened.  If it decided to do that, it could even try to get some kind of face saving deal at Geneva II.  Attacking Iran is not an option (even less so after the beautiful elections the Iranians just had).  Blaming Russia is not an option either as there is exactly zero proof of Russian involvement.

The war itself is, of course, not quite over yet.  This will all take time to play itself out.  But yes, this is most definitely the beginning of the end.  To the disgraceful defeats in Afghanistan and Iraq the US can now add a no less disgraceful defeat in Syria.  Good.

The Saker

They really *HATE* each other!

Source

I have been following US-Soviet and US-Russian relations since at least age 5, and professionally most of my adult life, and I have never seen two leaders so obviously hating each other as Putin and Obama.  I just watched their joint press conference at the G8 summit in Northern Ireland and I am truly left speechless: the mood was clearly so ice cold that one could almost visualize frost building around (and even on) the two leaders.  Just look at this screenshot:

Some facial expression and body language, no? Putin actually went as far as thanking Obama for a “frank exchange of views” which, in diplomatic language, is tantamount to an admission of a verbal fist fight. I am not surprised by that.  Putin probably despises Obama for being the spineless prostitute that he is, whereas Obama probably hates and fears Putin for daring to say “no” to the Anglo Empire.  But the fact that both of these men made only a modicum of efforts to conceal their intense dislike for each other really amazes me.  We are far from the skillfully orchestrated love fest between Kerry and Lavrov.   I know, one should not judge on appearance.  But I will do that anyway.  I feel that 4 decades of careful observation of such meetings grant me that right.  And here is what I read into this: Putin comprehensively rejected everything Obama wanted from him.  The pretense is now over – Russia and the USA are on a clear collision course. The Saker
Posted by VINEYARDSAKER: at22:37
Obama, Putin Still at Odds over Syria
Local Editor
Also differences over the Syrian crisis between the US and the Russian leaders remain deep, Barack Obama and Vladidmir Putin said the two men agreed that violence might be stopped in the conflict-hit country.

The US and Russian presidents faced off on the sidelines of the G8 summit in Northern Ireland, days aftObama and Putin on the sidelines of G8 er the White House signaled it would begin arming foreign-backed militants fighting the Syrian government.

Putin and Obama did not try to disguise the fact they are estranged on Syria and cannot agree on Syrian President Bashar al-Assad’s fate, but appeared keen to keep flagrant differences on the vicious crisis from sinking wider US-Russia relations.

They announced Obama would go to Moscow on September 3-4 for a full-scale summit, expanding a previously announced trip that includes the G20 summit in St Petersburg.

“Of course our opinions do not converge, but all of us have the intention to stop the violence in Syria and stop the growth in the number of victims,” said Putin.

He said he and Obama agreed that the vicious civil war that has killed at least 90,000 people according to the United Nations must end “peacefully” and through talks.

“We agreed to push the parties to the negotiating table.”

Obama acknowledged that they had “different perspectives”. But the session ended with a firm handshake, after the US president made a gentle joke about the Russian leader’s prowess in judo and his own declining basketball skills.

Washington and Moscow have agreed in principle to host a conference in Geneva on ending the violence in Syria, but the timetable for the meeting has continually slipped over disagreements on who should attend.

Source: Agencies

18-06-2013 – 09:37 Last updated 18-06-2013 – 10:12

“Morsi and the Muslim Brotherhood have no shame…”

Via FLC

“… Egypt’s April 6 Movement (the Democratic Front) issued a statement Saturday accusing President Mohamed Morsi of capitalising on Syrian blood and promoting a US agenda with his decision to cut ties with Bashar Al-Assad’s Syria.
“We are surprised about Morsi’s condemnation of foreign intervention in Syria, being that he also demands a no-fly zone over Syria, which would allow for foreign intervention,” read the statement, referring to the president’s comments Saturday during a conference organised by Islamists in support of the Syrian uprising.
The implementation of no-fly zone would require the destruction of Syria’s Russian-built air defences.
“Morsi and the Muslim Brotherhood have no shame in trading on anything, even the blood of martyrs in Syria, in order to win the sympathy of Egyptians,” added the statement, pointing out that Morsi’s call to support the opposition coincides with Washington’s decision on Thursday to supply Syria’s rebels with weapons. ..”

Posted by G, M, Z, or B at 10:30 AM

‘Morsi’s top aides advised him against the move on Syria’

Ahram Online - “… The announcement that Egypt will sever all ties with Syria, made by President Mohamed Morsi while addressing thousands of Muslim Brotherhood members at Cairo Stadium Saturday night, reflects a decision made by the president against the advice of top bureaucratic aides,… The decision was pronounced in the course of an otherwise fiery speech where the president in a high pitch insisted that “Hezbollah should leave Syria.”While some government sources said they were briefly notified …  others said they only knew of the decision when it was announced at the Muslim Brotherhood event on Saturday night.According to the informed sources, who spoke to Ahram Online on condition of anonymity, Morsi was advised against the move by some of his top bureaucratic aides who insisted that the move would antagonise the Syrian regime against any mediation forums that have been proposed…”

Posted by G, M, Z, or B at 3:50 PM

French FM Dumas: ‘British officials told me of the planned destruction of the Syrian regime 2 years BEFORE the Arab spring!’

FLC

“The reason? Syria held some strong anti-Israeli positions & it was necessary to destroy it”
Posted by G, M, Z, or B at 12:21 PM

Assad: Europe Will ’Pay Price’ for Arming Militants

Local Editor
Syrian President Bashar al-Assad during an interview with the German journalit; June 17, 2013The Syrian President Bashar al-Assad warned on Monday that the European countries will “pay the price” if they send weapons to the opposition militant groups inside Syria.“Europe will pay the price as its depth will turn to be fertile ground for terrorism in case the Europeans send weapons to the militant groups in Syria,” he told the German daily Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung.
Noting that Europeans adopt a hostile attitude towards the Syrian government, especially France and the UK, the Syrian President stressed that arming the militant groups in Syria will transfer terrorism to Europe.“The militants will return to their countries with extremist ideology and high battle skills,” he said.
President Assad made it clear that “Europeans deliver weapons to terrorists… Some distinguish between ‘good’ and ‘bad’ fighters, as they have made a difference a couple of years ago between ‘good’ and ‘bad’ Taliban and a ‘good’ and ‘bad’ Al-Qaeda. Is that reasonable?” he wondered.
On the relations with France and Britain, Assad expressed beliefs that the two states have a problem how to deal with – in their opinion – the disturbing Syrian role in the region.“They, along with the U.S., look for puppets that enforce their interests and we refused to be as such. We’ve always been independent and free. France and Britain are historically colonial powers. Probably they have not forgotten that. They act in this region through representatives and collaborators.”“What is happening in Syria is a chance for those states to push a non-submissive state towards the brink and to look for a new president who says ‘yes’ (to their orders). They have not found and they will not find in the future,” Assad stressed.

Regarding the situation on ground, the Syrian President confirmed that what is going on is not a war of an army against another army.

“Our army instead acts against gangs… The hunt for the terrorists has a high price. We have no doubt that we will eliminate the terrorists on our soil completely, he promised, reiterating that the real problem is the destruction created.

Assad also slammed that accusations that the government is responsible for the destruction, recalling that it started reforms prior to the protests that were claimed to be peaceful.
“What the West doesn’t want to see is the following scene: Even in the first week of demonstrations there have been police martyrs. How could it happen that police officers were killed during peaceful demonstrations? Among the protesters there were armed men who were shooting at the police. Sometimes they were in places far from the demonstration, and from there they were shooting at demonstrators and policemen, so one might assume that one side had opened fire on the other.”
Fielding a question on foreign troops fighting for the Syrian Army, Assad noted that mass media try to convey the image that the Lebanon Resistance of Hezbollah is fighting in Syria because the Syrian army is weak, but “that’s an exaggeration,” he believed.

“In fact, we won great victories in a few months in different regions, which are perhaps more important than al-Qusayr. But they haven’t been reported. No one else is fighting in such areas as the Syrian army. There are also local vigilante groups which defend their own areas together with the army. That is one reason for our success.”

Anwsering a question on whether any insurgent is believed to be a terrorist, the Syrian President stated that it is illegal in all countries to carry weapons to kill innocent people, to terrorize citizens, to do harm and to steal.

“In all countries of the world, anyone who carries weapons – except armed forces and police – to harass and kill people, is defined as terrorist, and armed people in Syria are carrying weapons just to do that. Whether he has an extremist or criminal motive, the terrorist deserves the name. Therefore, we distinguish between terrorists and the opposition, which is political and has a political program. Killing and slaughtering are nothing but terrorism,” the Syrian President elaborated.

Assad predicted that the crisis could take a long time due to “the external factor that is trying to prolong it politically and militarily.”
Syrian President Bashar al-Assad during an interview with the German journalit; June 17, 2013
Fielding a question on whether Syria conflict might shift to the neighboring countries, he said that the conflict has a domino effect that no one could control.

“It may be that one of the major powers initiates this process, but no one will be able to stop it at a certain point. There are today in the Middle East new social boundaries – religious and national, in addition to the policy limits… No one can imagine the new regional map. It will probably be a map for innumerable wars in the Middle East and possibly elsewhere, which none can stop it.”

On the foreign interference, the Syrian President said there is a big difference between cooperation among states and the interference in the internal affairs of a state with the intent to undermine its stability.

“States shall cooperate in a will to ensure their sovereignty, independence, freedom of their decisions and their stability. The relationship between Syria, Russia, Iran, and other countries that are on the Syrian side, is a relationship of cooperation which is guaranteed and protected by international law… The interference is a blatant violation of international law and the sovereignty of the country; they (western states) want to destabilize the country and spread chaos and backwardness.”

Turning to the al-Nusra front terrorist group fighting against the Syrian army and its source of weapons and money, Assad believed the group is a branch of Al Qaeda which represents the same ideology.

“You can find it in Syria, Iraq, Lebanon and Jordan,” he said to the German journalist.
“Funding is provided primarily by anonymous individuals and organizations with same ideology. They have huge amounts of money and weapons. The donations will go directly to al-Nusra front, it is difficult to track down sources and customers of these resources. Al-Nusra front aims at the establishment of an Islamic state and is mainly based on the Wahhabi creed…It wants Islamic law. This is a misleading and distortion of Islam. On Youtube you can get an idea about their barbaric actions. The Belgian TV showed recently how an innocent man was beheaded with an ax. The members of al-Nusra front come from Syria, other Arab and Islamic states and from Europe,” he pointed out.

Moreover, the Syrian President justified bombarding residential areas by stating that the Syrian army hunts the terrorists wherever they go, and they often use residential areas as human shields.
“Western media reported that 50,000 civilians were in al-Qusayr. The number of inhabitants was originally much smaller. As the terrorists seized the town, the inhabitants left it. We found almost no civilians when we moved in al-Qusayr” before the fights broke out.

“This is evidenced by the fact that most of the victims are members of the military. The civilians who were killed are victims of terrorists who were executed, enforced and used as human shields. Large numbers of civilian victims were killed by suicide attacks and car bombs,” Assad added.
Syrian President Bashar al-Assad during an interview with the German journalit; June 17, 2013
In a related context, Assad denied the U.S, British and French allegations that the Syrian Army had used chemical weapons in its military operations.

“The White House announced that 150 deaths occurred in a period of one year. Militarily, conventional weapons can kill in one day a lot more than that number. Weapons, which are used for mass destruction, are capable of killing hundreds of thousands at once. For this reason they are used. It is therefore illogical to use chemical weapons to kill a number of people that can be achieved by using conventional weapons,” he said confidently.

“We have not said that we possess chemical weapons, or that we do not possess. Chemical weapons are weapons of mass destruction. Had Paris, London and Washington have only one evidence for their claims, they would have submitted this to the world,” he went on to say.

“The terrorists are those who use chemical weapons, we have asked the UN to send a commission to the place where the terrorists have used chemical weapons – and that was in Aleppo. French and British governments have blocked this request. If the commission came, it would have found that terrorists have used chemical weapons. Everything that is said about the use of chemical weapons is a continuation of the lies about Syria. It is an attempt to justify more military interference,” Assad stressed.

Regarding the dialogue with the Syrian opposition, Assad said that he will sit down at a table with all opposition groups which carry no weapons, do not support terrorism and have a political program.
“The opposition has to prove itself in elections… We are dealing with forces that call themselves opposition. Here we ask two questions: What is their popular base? And what is their political program? Accordingly we act.”

About the political solution for the Syrian crisis, the president voiced that there will be no problem if the opposition acts independently and nationally.

“Yet, the opposition abroad presents its reports to Western foreign ministries and their intelligence apparatuses,” he believed.

“The side which funds them provides them with the decisions. For us, opposition means to represent a part of the population and not a foreign state. To be a genuine opposition, you have to live on the Syrian soil with its people as well as its problems and needs of life. Only then, this opposition can be part of a political process.”

Assad expressed hopes that the Geneva Conference will be an important station to advance dialogue in Syria and to ban weapons being smuggled to the country and terrorists being infiltrated.
“A political solution is based on stopping the smuggling of terrorists and weapons into Syria. We hope that the Geneva Conference begins with this point… Without this result, the conference would not succeed.”

Britain and France reconsidered sending arms to the militants in Syria as they both lifted the arms embargo on the opposition militant groups.

U.S. had already decided to provide the militants in Syria with developed weapons, but Secretary of State declared that no official steps will be taken before G8 summit.
Translated from German by Eslam al-Rihani

 الرئيس الأسد لصحيفة ألمانية: أوروبا “ستدفع الثمن” إذا سلحت المعارضة السورية
Source: Al-Manar Website
17-06-2013 – 21:27 Last updated 17-06-2013 – 21:31

Iran’s Lesson to Washington’s Arabs

Iranian president-elect Hassan Rowhani waves as he attends a press conference in Tehran on 17 June 2013. (Photo: AFP – Behrouz Mehri)

By: Ibrahim al-Amin

Published Monday, June 17, 2013

Iran’s presidential election poses some important and uncomfortable questions to its Arab neighbors across the Gulf: How has the Islamic Republic’s theocratic political system succeeded in maintaining its religious and ethnic diversity and developing its economic and technological abilities in the face of modern history’s most restrictive financial sanctions?

The election surprised many with its 70 percent turnout and the overwhelming victory of Hassan Rouhani in the first round, the reasons for which will have to be carefully considered over the coming days. It’s clear that Rouhani was the candidate most different from current President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.

One has to ask why is it that none of the conservatives candidates were willing to pull out in order to put forward a united front, knowing full well that the other side was gaining in the polls. One theory may be that the conservatives, who are more influential in state affairs, had decided that a change of course was necessary.

 

The conservatives’ miscalculation may also be due to an underestimation of their rivals, even though the reformists were clearly gaining momentum during the campaign period. By all appearances, the Iranian public had grown weary of Ahmadinejad’s leadership, particularly his economic policies and his tense relations with the West and the Gulf Arab countries. The question remains, however, can Rouhani remain true to the Islamic revolution’s principles while at the same time satisfying the needs of the people?

Even with all the difficulties the country is facing, it is clear that Iran’s democratic experiment has been successful to a large degree. Despite the Arab Spring and the recent protests in Turkey, Tehran did not hesitate to go forward with the presidential election, which could easily have been exploited by one side or another to undermine the regime as a whole.

And, of course, everyone is waiting to see what the new president plans to do on the Syrian front. For those who are betting on an Iranian retreat from the region’s burning issues, I advise them to take advantage of the opening that a Rouhani presidency may provide to find a political settlement that would stem the relentless bloodshed.

Ibrahim al-Amin is editor-in-chief of Al-Akhbar.

This article is an edited translation from the Arabic Edition.

Putin: Russia Arming Legitimate Gov’t in Syria, West Arming Organ-Eaters

Putin: Russia Arming Legitimate Gov’t in Syria, West Arming Organ-Eaters
Local Editor
Russian President Vladimir Putin slammed the Western countries for arming foreign-backed militants fighting the Syrian government, warning that such move contradicts basic human values since the armed groups are committing war crimes and crimes against humanity.

DurinPutin and Cameron in a joint press conferenceg a joint press conference with British Prime Minister David Cameron on Sunday, Putin said: “You will not deny that one does not really need to support the people who not only kill their enemies, but open up their bodies, eat their intestines in front of the public and cameras. Are these the people you want to support? Is it them who you want to supply with weapons? Then this probably has little relation to humanitarian values that have been preached in Europe for hundreds of years.”

Putin was referring to video footage surfaced on the Internet last month of a militant eating what appeared to be the heart of a dead Syrian soldier. In an interview with Time magazine on May 14, the cannibal militant, known by his nom de guerre Abu Sakkar, confirmed that the video is real and that he did indeed take a bite of the soldier’s lung. Human Rights Watch said it was a war crime.

Putin said that Russia by contrast was arming the legitimate government of Syria “We are not breaching any rules and norms and we call on all our partners to act in the same fashion,” he said.

Speaking after a difficult meeting with Putin in Northern Ireland, Cameron claimed both men were in agreement on the need to end the human catastrophe of the Syrian crisis. But there was little to suggest the two men made progress on how to convene a fresh Syrian peace conference in Geneva, let alone who should attend, or its agenda.

“There are very big differences between the analysis we have of what happened in Syria and who is to blame but where there is common ground is that we both see a humanitarian catastrophe,” Cameron said.

“What I take from our conversation today is that we can overcome these differences if we recognize that we share some fundamental aims: to end the conflict, to stop Syria breaking apart, to let the Syrian people decide who governs them and to take the fight to the extremists and defeat them,” he said.

Source: Agencies

17-06-2013 – 14:10 Last updated 17-06-2013 – 14:10

روسيا: لن نسمح بفرض حظر جوي في سوريا

الإثنين‏، 17‏ حزيران‏، 2013

 أوقات الشام

 أكد الناطق الرسمي باسم الخارجية الروسية الكسندر لوكاشيفتش أن روسيا لن تسمح بفرض منطقة حظر جوي في سوريا. وقال لوكاشيفتش في مؤتمر صحفي “نحن لن نسمح بسيناريو كهذا”، مشيراً إلى أن “جميع هذه المناورات حول مناطق الحظر الجوي والممرات الإنسانية سببها عدم احترام القانون الدولي”. وأشار لوكاشيفتش إلى أن موقف روسيا “واضح ومبدئي” حيال فرض حظر جوي. وتابع “لقد شاهدنا كيف تفرض هذه المناطق وكيف طبقت القرارات في ليبيا.. لا نريد أن يتكرر ذلك في الأزمة السورية.. لن نسمح بهذا السيناريو”. كما أوضح أن عقد توريد منظومة “اس ـ 300″ إلى سورية وقع في وقت سابق، مشيراً إلى أن العقد لم ينفذ حتى هذه اللحظة، مشدداً على أن روسيا لا تخرق القوانين الدولية عبر توريد الأسلحة إلى الحكومة السورية. وتابع لوكاشيفتش أن قرار ارسال قوات حفظ سلام روسية إلى منطقة هضبة الجولان عوضاً عن الكتيبة النمساوية لم يتم اتخاذه بعد. وأكد المسؤول الروسي على أن الشرط الرئيسي لذلك هو “موافقة كل من سورية وإسرائيل والأمم المتحدة على ذلك.. عندها كونوا على ثقة بأن قواتنا ستنفذ مهمتها بإخلاص

Salim Haraba: on Mursi’s war on Syria

The Takfiri Armies

1010580_479222622157597_2084352249_n[1]

The Takfiris who are working wonders in Syria are not news to this world nor are their deeds unknown or unfamiliar . Long before in Europe, labeling others as heretics has been one of the most spread practices of the Catholic Church who worked wonders in this instance killing scientists and executing saints and this before and after installing what they called the Inquisition . Not very much later, under the banner of Catholicism, Master Columbus – the pirate who worked under the order of their Spanish majesties- invaded the Americas and disposed of the natives , killing them , sacking their country , enslaving them , starving them and chasing them out of their villages and towns . Columbus was just performing his religious duties regarding those who were not Christians because he thought he had the Divine right to do this to infidels as ordained by the Church and by the Catholic  Monarchs who needed badly the money and the gold. The Anglican church did not behave any better regarding the Irish,  when it invaded Ireland and established its colony considering Irish as sorcerers- who need to burn on the stake- nor did  the Puritan Anglo Saxons who landed on the northern New Continent – at the end of the 17th century – and decimated the indigenous populations .

What Takfiris are doing, right now, falls within the same line of conduct,  punishing those heretics who have not followed the literal religion as practiced and understood by the Takfiris who were initiated by various religious authorities and used as political and killing tools in a vast  world conspiracy . Many religions have been subject to this deviation , mainly Christianity- as practiced by the Church – Judaism- as practiced by Zionists-  and Islam as understood and practiced by Sunni rulers and Sunni Religious References to serve the  inimical  foreign  agendas of the World order .  Other religions also  might be subject to same kind of experience .

This attitude -of self righteousness -comes from total ignorance of the purport of religion , whereby one considers his own religion as better than others’ which makes him think that he has the right to kill and abuse the lives of those he considers beneath him . This is how the Puritan settlers -convinced that the Natives had no right to the land of America- which is Native land – exterminated them almost entirely until 2 millions only were left from the 20 millions that populated the North continent before the Puritan settlers landed . The same attitude is found  behind the Zionist usurp of Palestine on behalf of Zionist Jews who think that God favored them among others,  and gave them the land of Palestine . This idea that my religion is better than yours., and I am better than you,  and this gives me rights over you,  is behind so many miseries that have plagued humanity recently, the last one being this ugly war on Syria – waged under the banner of Islam- against a peaceful country and a peaceful people . No doubt that this attitude comes from the blinded ego  and from the greed of predator countries  who use the ignorance of people to mobilize a full world army , and this has nothing to do with religion itself .

Even if not directly threatening to others,  this feeling of a superiority of a certain religion is often misplaced . Many Muslims think Islam is superior to other religions while they know neither true Islam nor other religions . It is true that Islam completes Judaism and Christianity-  in a way- but this makes Islam complementary in a sense- but not superior to the other religions . While the great misunderstanding many Muslims show – and among them ‘ religious people and ‘Ulemas – comes from  considering Native religions,  and the religions that pervaded the Antiquity and the Native religions of the people of Africa and America as pagan religions,  and to condemn these religions without knowing much about them .

The respectable ‘Alem- upon seeing a Hindu revering a cow – described him as a lost soul . Who told you so Mister and how do you know that this soul is lost and not yours’ and who are you to judge and say so?  Have you been given authority to look in the hearts of people and see what only God can see ? What if the same Hindu judges you saying that you repeat verses and words you do not understand instead of worshiping God through the visible and the manifest , through God’s creation , through Mother Nature and Godly Saints and Deities ? And why is revering the cow that gives food and milk labeled as irreligious while killing people in the name of religion has not been sanctioned yet or labeled as Kufr ?

There is a need that all religions that are searching for the same truth meet because,  having religious people  hurt each other will be hurtful to the common truth they are all seeking,  and to their respective religions that will be exposed by atheists who will think that atheism is better than religion.

The Sheikh of al Azhar- who was has been hosted today by al Mayadeen TV- and who upon being asked why al Azhar has not issued a fatwa that prohibits the killing of Muslims by other Muslims as happening in Syria , said that al Azhar does not need to issue such fatwa because the ordinances of the religion are clear regarding this matter that Muslim is not to kill another Muslim ? I bet the al Azhar would have hurried into  issuing a fatwa had  other religions or beliefs- like Hinduism or Christianity- or practices by Hindus or Christians-  been under  question. This variety in God’s creation and in belief has been intentionally created by God, not as a source of antagonism and discord but as a source of learning and knowledge for the authentification of one’s belief and confirmation of one’s faith. . We are here to learn and to become good recipients to true Religion and we learn from others, otherwise we are liable to sway the Takfiri way or become complacent partners in the crimes committed nowadays against humanity and religion .

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.