Conflict of Interest and the Obliteration of Concept of Liberation

By Nahida – Exiled Palestinian

We must use terror, assassination, intimidation, land confiscation and the cutting of all social services to rid the Galilee of its Arab population“. ~~ [41] The Koenig Report

We have to kill all the Palestinians unless they are resigned to live here as slaves.” [42]~~ Shlomo Lahat,  mayor of Tel Aviv

We shall reduce the Arab population to a community of woodcutters and waiters.” [43]~~ Uri Lubrani, Israeli Prime Minister David Ben Gurion’s special adviser on Arab Affairs

We declare openly that the Arabs have no right to settle on even one centimeter of Eretz Israel … Force is all they do or ever will understand. We shall use the ultimate force until the Palestinians come crawling to us on all fours.” [44]~~ Raphael Eitan, Chief of Staff of the Israeli Armed Forces

 “Between ourselves it must be clear that there is no room for both peoples together in this country. We shall not achieve our goal if the Arabs are in this small country. There is no other way than to transfer the Arabs from here to neighboring countries – all of them. Not one village, not one tribe should be left“. [39]~~ Joseph Weitz, head of the Jewish Agency’s Colonization Department
Source

Through many years of campaigning for Palestine, I came to realize that the movement is heavily infiltrated by Jewish Zionist and anti-Zionist activists, thus affecting at core level the path, aims and strategy of the movement. These elements have also managed to influence many in the movement including some Palestinian “intellectuals”.

Of course, I do not object to the participation of Jewish supporters in the Solidarity Movement with Palestine, however I strongly object to them having leadership and senior influential positions in the Movement:
NOT because they are Jewish;
NOT because of some alleged primitive irrational “hatred” for Jews;
and certainly NOT because of some ridiculous claim of “hidden anti-Semitism”;

But simply because of CONFLICT OF INTEREST, whereby many of those supporters actually and  admittedly harbour love, warm feelings and affection towards the “Jewish state” and its “population”. Many in fact have close relatives and family members who live in occupied Palestine.

Through this configuration, and motivated by sentimental attachment and kinship loyalty, they were keen to obliterate the concept of LIBERATION and to remove it completely from the vocabulary of activists, and inserting instead the concept of “two people, one future“, i.e. “working for justice” has been twisted to mean working for peace and security for both “Israelis” and Palestinians.

Some other consequences of allowing such elements at the heart of the Solidarity Movement is their STEERING the movement towards a position more favourable to “Israeli” Jews through the continual deflection from understanding the role of  international Jewish organizations in financing, promoting, sustaining and  defending the “Jewish state”.

This inappropriate form of control aims to polish up the ugly image of  racist Jewish “Israelis”, by prohibiting discussions related to four main identifiable problems and forbidding the scrutiny of  these vital topics:

1) The problem of the Ideology of Jewish Supremacism. (access to information denied by accusation of anti-Semitism)

2) The problem of Global Jewish-Zionist Networking.
(access to information denied by accusation of anti-Semitism)

3) The problem of idolizing the Holocaust -which is used as a tool to further Zionists aim. (access to information denied by accusation of Holocaust denial)

4) The problem of manipulating world policies through False-Flag operations. (access to information denied by accusation of being a conspiracy theorist) 

 Disinformation leads to a misguided Solidarity

 The suppression of the crucial information listed above has succeeded in blurring the vision, aims and strategy, thus steering the Solidarity Movement away and causing it to go completely off track.

Whereas, activists are prevented from scrutinizing or analysing these alarming problems through smear and intimidation;

Whereas, the concept of LIBERATION has been removed from the vocabulary of activists only to be replaced by “security for both“, and “equal rights for all” including land-thieves, mass-murderers and serial-killers;

Whereas, debates are framed and political discussions are limited to a mere criticism of some “Israeli” policies;

Whereas, activists are allowed only to analyse the Palestinian problem through the paradigm of two words,  Imperialism and Zionism;

Whereas, the greatest danger to Palestinian Struggle for Liberation is the trap of the so called “abandoning Zionism; (for what is abandoning a word or a concept when they keep the loot?)

Whereas, instead of supporting the FULL LIBERATION of Palestine, activists are tricked into promoting the ANNEXATION of what is left of Palestine, thereby creating defacto an even greater “ISRAEL”;

Whereas, activists are prevented from understanding the motivator and animator of the Jewish-Zionist occupiers’ sadistic behaviour (i.e the concept of “choseness”, an ideology of racism and supremacy);

Whereas, attempts are made to actively “normalize” a militaristic supremacist society, thus creating a false image of that society;

Whereas, deception and lying to Palestinians and the world was used by pretending that “It is possible to achieve equality with such supremacists”;

Whereas, activists are prevented from understanding the methods used to influence world-governments policies and public opinion (by deflecting from examining the work of the global Jewish-Zionist Networks including those who present themselves as representatives of Jewish communities, and deflecting from scrutinizing Mossad’s international criminal work and their False Flag ops.

Whereas, activists were prohibited from understanding the way the Holocaust is used as a justification to the theft of Palestine, the ongoing ethnic cleansing of its indigenous people and the permanent usurpation of Historic Palestine;

With all the above, it becomes clear that the Solidarity Movement has been hoodwinked and steered away from being a vibrant campaigner for the Liberation of Palestine into an agent of protection of the interest of the occupiers and their international network of support, with its powerful lobby , financial support  and human resources.

 By abandoning the concept of LIBERATION, the Solidarity Movement is led to a cul-de-sac where a just solution can NEVER be found. Thus the Movement is rendered paralyzed and totally ineffective.

 When activists are prohibited from promoting the Liberation of Palestine, as to not hurt the “sensitivities” of those who worry about the future of Jewish “Israelis”, i.e. perpetrators of egregious crimes, of them losing privileges and being brought to justice, then some soul searching and profound ethical re-evaluation is much recommended.

When activists are diverted from exploring the underlying racist and  supremacist ideology behind zionism, and when they are hindered from discovering that this ideology is neither accidental nor peripheral, but essential characteristic of “Israeli” society, then the Solidarity Movement loses a key argument to galvanize public opinion, in spite of the fact that this public opinion is overwhelmingly opposed to racism and supremacy.

 When activists are slandered for discussing the global Jewish-Zionist Networks which has been vital for the survival of  the Zionist entity, through their financial, moral, political and even militaristic support, the Solidarity Movement (willingly or unwillingly) not only fails to neutralize such networks, but it actually participates in protecting these networks and deflecting away from their criminal activities.

When on one hand activist’s attention is steered in one direction, namely the rejection of a soon to be irrelevant and defunct word, Zionism, and on another hand they are forbidden to reject the material manifestation of Zionism, namely the presence of mainly criminal occupiers under the banner “Israel”, then the outcome of this literally schizophrenic outlook, is an oxymoronic circular race, going nowhere.

When activists are obliged to look at Palestine only through the prism of alleged “uniqueness” and “eternity” of Jewish suffering, and through the absurd concept of a “national homeland for the Jews” at the cost of another people’s existence, then the Solidarity Movement acts as an enemy against the inalienable Human Rights of Palestinians to live on their ancestral Homeland, with unobstructed sovereignty, like any other peaceful Nation..

When a Solidarity Movement frames the quest to resolve the situation, with antisocial parameters such as alleged “rights” for Jewish foreigners to settle and to own, -and this with total impunity, land they conquered by terrorism and on which they still perpetrate atrocities tantamount to slow genocide, then this strictly controlled Solidarity is an irrefutable collaborator of a “final solution” which consists of expatriation, genocide, ethnic cleansing, robbing an entire population of its basic Human Rights, only to be enslaved under the thumb of a supremacist collective,, who enjoys ruthless power, equipped with an enormous arsenal, absent of even the remotest sign of guilt or remorse, let alone considering the normative procedure of Restitution and Compensations.
Such “final solution” would become a Carte Blanche for future conquests, future unrestricted genocides, endless wars; basically human regression.

By insisting on squeezing the Palestinian struggle to fit the apartheid model of South Africa, it is a double whammy:
Firstly, presenting the Zionist entity as a normal state with a few apartheid policies that can be changed is fundamentally false:
 a) what is happening in Palestine is not mere segregation and apartheid, what is going on is ethnic cleansing, wiping a country off the map and slow genocide.
 b) Racism in the “Jewish state” is ideological, grounded in “sacred” texts, unlike South Africa in which racism was a momentary convenience, reflecting opportunistic fulfillment of self-interest of a white minority.

Secondly, when activists are spoon-fed with the mantra of “Equal rights, One State, Two People”, offered as a model of solution  rather than other successful models of Liberation, such as Algeria for example, that means the Solidarity Movement  participates in whitewashing the century-old Zionist crimes, such paradigm gives a lee-way to the thriving of an illegal genocidal expansionist racist entity.

Like North America, South Africa was conquered and subsequently ruled by white Europeans several centuries ago, i.e. BEFORE International Law adopted through the  Nuremberg Principles right after WW2, explicitly prohibited land acquisition through military conquest, and clearly defined Crimes Against Humanity, amidst them Wars of Aggression and Conquest , Genocide and Instigation of Wars & Crimes against peace, and War crimes  to be the worst categories of crimes. All the latter Crimes having been, and still are in even worse manner, perpetrated by Jewish Israelis.

 Furthermore, this “one-state, two people” approach fully ignores the unbalanced premise of the reality on the ground, and the implication such proposal would have – namely the finalization of the aims of the racist, expansionist and exclusionary Jewish Nationalist experiment called “Israel”. It would de facto annexe all residual Palestinian post-1967 Bantustans, and attach them to what would inevitably be “Israel” no matter what convoluted name would be attached to. Because indeed, there is no need to be a rocket scientist to know full well who would keep the arsenal, who would keep the apparatus of power, judicial, militaristic, executive, financial, etc, all the while the demand granting equal rights to all, includes supremacists and invaders who have no historic or legal rights to the land, who are still flocking to Palestine as we speak, armed to the teeth by their support networks in US-America.

Insisting on following the South African Anti Apartheid model as a strategy, rather than pursuing the path for Liberation would be FATAL to the Palestinians legitimate aspiration of freedom and liberation. such solution would mean granting the Zionist occupier a comprehensive and “peaceful” take over, and unrestricted control over our land and our lives.

Furthermore, by allowing infiltrators to target and marginalize Palestinians and pro-Palestinian activists who call for Full Liberation, the Solidarity Movement exhibits serious symptoms of loss of focus and confusion, wasting time and effort, to the sole benefit of the occupier.

Zionist Jews did not come to Palestine with olive branches to begin with, they did not come with peaceful intentions of co-existence with the indigenous population. They gushed in like savages, terrorizing unarmed peaceful farmers and land tenders, they tortured and imprisoned, they came to destroy, “cleanse”, conquer and dominate.

A century on, their racist ideology, their use of terror, and their abominable psychopathic behaviour has only intensified, and drastically. The vast majority of that artificial “society” -and for very specific supremacist ideological reasons– are unwilling/ incapable of viewing the “other” as equal and over the passing of time they have shown to be unwilling to become modest or peaceful , let alone remain peaceful.

Would any decent human-being force a mother to marry the murderer of her child?

Would any decent human-being find it acceptable to force a child to live with his paedophile abuser?

Would any decent human-being accuse these people, child and mother of “immorality” or call them “unrealistic” for refusing to tie their future with their abusers?
 
Through the delusional “Equal Rights, One State, Two People” proposal, the FACTS ON THE GROUNDS would remain unchanged, and probably aggravated, since these FACTS, stock and barrel, would remain in the hands of SUPREMACISTS.

This is NOT a solution.


An INFORMED Solidarity would regain its clarity of vision and direction

No fair-minded person would talk about a practical, realistic future solution without considering the following:

  • FULL LIBERATION of Historic Palestine. The Holy Land must be free from atrocities committing racists. A way must be found, to bring reason to the Holy Land, and there is no other way than to evict foreign criminals.
  • FULL SOVEREIGNTY of the Palestinian Nation over their ancestral country: Palestine, with a constitution and a political system of their own independent choice. For the sake of International Peace and Security.
  • A Palestinian JUDICIARY and IMMIGRATION System, will respectively prosecute former “Israeli” criminals and their associates, and/or grant or decline on an individual basis, a Right to Remain, based on criteria solely to be defined by said Immigration and Integration Services. Anyone who can prove non-participation in the ex-Israeli occupation apparatus, and who has demonstrated ability and willingness to a respectable and law-abiding conduct, will probably obtain a chance to gain unrestricted Palestinian citizenship, with equal rights.
  • RESTITUTION and COMPENSATIONS: Palestine and the Palestinian Nation at large, are entitled to full and unconditional Restitution of their land and property whenever possible, assorted with appropriate Compensation for more than seven decades of deprivation and slow genocide, Cultural destruction, and a whole array of atrocities and usurpation.

Make no mistake, the fate of Palestine will be the forbearing sign indicating the shape of our future. By failing to liberate Palestine, we forfeit International Law, and that unambiguously opens the gates to an abyss. Any predatory group equipped with some military, would be vindicated to conquer and destroy whatever they want, wherever they want, on the primitive basis of military force. Basically a staggering regression back into the Stone Age methodology, expanded globally by contemporaneous weaponry’s range and effect, which is biocidal,and instantaneous .

In conclusion, in this war-ridden era it has become a matter of acute urgency and prime importance, that Nations reconvene as a Community, to fulfill its responsibility to Restore International Law, as well as to affirm universal  principles of ethics, in order to stop the bloodshed and destruction of our beautiful planet, by stopping predators and warmongers by all means necessary.

Advertisements
%d bloggers like this: