Gabi Weber: The Gatekeeper of Freiburg University

Gabi Weber: The Gatekeeper of Freiburg University

DateWednesday, June 26, 2013 at 10:10AM AuthorGilad Atzmon

Introduction by Gilad Atzmon: defeating Israel and The Lobby in a Western court, let alone, Germany, is a rare event. The following article tells the story of such a victory. It exposes the work of  Dr. Heinrich Schwendemann,  a shameless Sabbath Goy and a Holocaust Industry pedlar. Café Palestine Freiburg has managed to unveil his tactics and his destructive power within the University.

The Gatekeeper of Freiburg University

By Gabi Weber

Six weeks ago, the University of Freiburg was defeated by Cafe Palestine (Press Release)  when five judges at the Administrative Court of Freiburg rejected the  university’s arguments for denying Cafe Palestine a venue for one of its  speakers. Surely it is now time to delve a little more deeply into this unprecedented case which deserves close attention.

At the centre of it all we find one Dr.  Heinrich Schwendemann, Freiburg University historian and a founder of one of many German Holocaust memorial sites Shoa.de. 

A year ago, Cafe Palestine invited Dr.  Schwendemann, together with Prof. Norton Mezvinsky the renowned American Jewish historian to participate in a panel at Freiburg University. Also participating was Gilad Atzmon, the Jazz artist and author of “The Wandering Who – A Study of Jewish Identity Politics”.  This much discussed book has been endorsed by some of the most important scholars and intellectuals of our time with a German edition published in June 2012.

Dr. Schwendemann enthusiastically accepted the  invitation but, three  days before the event, he changed his mind  insisting that reading Atzmon’s book made it impossible for him to share  a platform with somebody who is “relativising the Holocaust”.  The  event took place without Dr. Schwendemann (Speech Gilad Atzmon), (Speech Prof. Mezvinsky)

In July 2012, Cafe Palestine planned to host another talk at  Freiburg University featuring French professor Christophe Oberlin from  Paris. The talk was titled “Plastic Surgery in Gaza” and was set to  attract the attention of the local medical community as well as  Palestine supporters and humanists. But Cafe Palestine soon learned that  the university had decided to withdraw use of the venue. Smelling a  rat, Cafe Palestine looked closely into this cancellation and after  having received the letter from the University outlining the reasons for  the cancellation, decided to issue a complaint at the Administrative Court.

It became clear that the University has been  foolish enough to allow itself to be guided by Dr. Schwendemann, even  going so far as to make Schwendemann part of its legal team.  Schwendemann duly appeared at the Administrative Court at the  defendant´s desk together with the University’s lawyer and a University  representative.

When it was  time for the University to present its defence, it was to Schwendemann  to whom it turned as its expert witness. Unfortunately, the arguments  presented by Schwendemann were so off-topic as to be simply  embarrassing. According to Schwendemann, Cafe  Palestine Freiburg´s crime was in bringing Gilad Atzmon as a speaker and  in translating his talks without comment which, according to   Schwendemann, meant that Cafe Palestine must be in complete accord with  absolutely everything Atzmon says and must fully support all his  political views. In fact, Cafe Palestine Freiburg doesn’t actually agree with everything  Gilad Atzmon or for that matter, any other participant of the talks,  says but does believe that Atzmon’s, as well as all the other speakers´  ideas deserve public attention, discussion and critical thought. It  further believed that Freiburg University was a most appropriate  platform for this discussion as was proved by the vivid debate that was  provoked by the Mezvinsky-Atzmon panel.Although the arguments against Atzmon delivered  by Schwendemann and the University were so ridiculous and out of order  that the Court dismissed them completely and rejected the University´s  defence altogether, it is still well worth examining their arguments  because they provide us with a glimpse into those powerful but  destructive mechanisms that interfere with our most precious rights and  liberties.

The University’s lawyer wrote that “According to Dr. Schwendemann”,  Atzmon’s book “contains the entire anti-Semitic arsenal including Holocaust Relativism” but failed to explain exactly what it was that makes Atzmon into a ‘relativist’.

Then, “According to (Atzmon’s book)  the Jews were made responsible for all evil,” at  which point it became embarrassingly obvious that Schwendemann, as well  as the University attorney had either not read the book or even more  worryingly, had failed to understand it. Atzmon’s book  is, as its title  suggests, ‘a study of Jewish Identity politics’. It refers to ideology  (Jewish identity politics) not to people (Jews) – a point Atzmon makes  clear numerous times in the text.

Atzmon may be right and he may be wrong, but his  ideas deserve attention and discussion and the University of Freiburg is  surely the place for this.

Schwendemann did state that “Atzmon declares that he is conducting his own personal war against Zionism and Jewish identity politics.” Yet, neither the historian nor the University explained what exactly is  wrong with criticism of a political standpoint –  or is it just that  political criticism to be outlawed in Freiburg University?

It took the Court under an hour to grasp that Freiburg University  was wrong and ruled the University’s conduct unlawful. Cafe Palestine  Freiburg and justice itself had won a landmark victory. Since then, the  University has assured Cafe Palestine that future applications for space  will be treated impartially.  A talk with Professor Oberlin from Paris  is planned for October.

So here are two question we might ask ourselves:

1. Why did this  German historian not take the opportunity to challenge Atzmon in the  open debate organised by Cafe Palestine Freiburg in July 2012 rather  than  act clandestinely, denying ‘the accused’ the possibility to defend  himself.
2. Do we need a German  from Freiburg University to tell an Israeli-born intellectual, who has  served in the Israeli Military during the first Lebanon war, how to deal  with his own society and its ideologies, his own past, his own culture  and the future? Is it not enough that the “Schwendemanns” of our time tell the Germans what to think?

And one more…. How is it possible that a prominent German university with the words “The Truth Will Set You Free”  engraved in gold over one of its entrances follows the orders of  someone like Dr. Heinrich Schwendemann – a man who by his conduct has  managed to set new standards of a lack of intellectual integrity and  clumsy scholarship. 

The Wandering Who? A Study Of Jewish Identity Politics  Amazon.com  or Amazon.co.uk

One Response

  1. Congratulation Mr Atzmon , this a winning point to your argument . I wish many others to come , because the truth will prevail no matter what . Furthermore the zionists are not different of what we have in the Arab world, so called (Brotherhood or Islamist). Because of the same ideology few days ago Mursy was ouset.We need more and more intellectuals to speak up to make the changes that we all deserve. Hopefully see you again in Ann arbor. Actually I told Linda, that I enjoyed talking to you , I wish you the best of luck on your difficult but rightfully on the right path journey.

Comments are closed.