THE RUSSIAN US ARRANGEMENT

The attendance of Geneva 2 on behalf of Syria cannot be interpreted except that it has been designed by US and Russia to lead nowhere . Maybe the goal is to consecrate Geneva one as a reference and to embarrass thus the Syrian leadership or it is in order to turn the thugs of the NATO from terrorists into a decent accepted opposition and part of the Syrian condition . For these reasons Iran has refused to attend the conference .Whatever Syria claims or pretends and however it tries to go around this fact , the truth is that Geneva 2 is purposeless and is a fruitless endeavor and could very well pass for a staged event . Otherwise how to explain the fact that things are not moving one inch in any direction ? Not only nothing has been achieved on the ground, but nothing is expected to be achieved .The four points presented today by the Syrian delegation with respect to the sovereignty and independence of the Syrian State tries to show that there is give and take and some progress , but this is very unlikely . This has all been orchestrated by Russia and the opposition has rejected all four points . Thus , the outcome on the negotiation table will be zero . The real outcome is being cooked elsewhere and the choices are not many . In order to continue to rule , Assad who agreed to shift the battle – according to Russia’s instructions – would have to present concessions not only to US but to Russia as well and this has already started in approving of the Egyptian military coup in Egypt and in turning the war against NATO and Israel into a war against Terrorism.

Advertisements

17 Responses

  1. وقبل اختتام المقال في هذا المقام لابد من استحضار كلمة تاريخية للرئيس بشار حافظ الاسد قالها لديبلوماسي رفيع حليف لبلاده يوم سأله مبكرا ماهي توقعاتك من الصديق الروسي في جنيف ؟ 


    نحن من يحدد نوع الموقف الذي سيتخذه اي صديق او حليف ونحن بالذات من سيحدد سقف مفاوضات جنيف، وتحديدا انطلاقا من تحولات الميدان والمعادلة المترتبه على تلك التحولات والتي ستفرض نفسها على الجميع ! 
  2. A good analysis, unfortunately in arabic, to show the difference between analysis and ANAL-ysis

  3. Response to uprootedpalestinians

    When I say something it is has nothing personal and not in order to upset anyone . and not only this but it could be a valuable piece of information . All what I am saying that this war has been taken out of the hands of the people to be invested somewhere else , it has been transferred somewhere else , call it diplomacy , call it internationalization, call it whatever you want to call it , it has been taken out of the hands of the people , of the Syrians and of the friends of the Syrians and this since the chemical weapons deal concluded through Russia. If victory there were – and there was victory – people in general were alienated from this victory , those who employed this victory are not those who sacrificed for this victory to be . The people, myself and many others who are with Syria and supporting the rule, find ourselves alienated . Those who are not alienated are those who identify fully with the Syrian regime and they are not many and not the majority anyway . The others , those who are not the regime’s men even though supporting it are dumfounded and do not know what to say . They don’t dare even complain . Mind you the Syrian regime has never been transparent with the Syrians but we had hoped that this will change but it hasn’t unfortunately . and this has become very clear today in how they have taken Geneva one as a reference while trying to give the impression that they were treading a different path . This plight with its dimension and implications did not bring the desired change in the way the regime relates to the people and this is unfortunate / This is to tell you that I do not appreciate particularly the tone that you adopt in responding to me . It is a superior tone of those who enjoy power as I do not appreciate making your comments part of my post as you have done in one instance at least . Thank you anyway and no grudge .

    • “This is to tell you that I do not appreciate particularly the tone that you adopt in responding to me . It is a superior tone of those who enjoy power as I do not appreciate making your comments part of my post as you have done in one instance at least .”


      As far as I am not putting my comments on your tongue I have the right to put it anywhere I like..This site and previous and future ones are dictated to support Axis of resistance where Syria, is the corner stone. 
      Truth bites, and better than the spasm of jumping to create a new thread, to repeat the same shit. 
      You have right to express your thoughts and we have the right to comment
  4. A Syrian lesson on the ongoing Geneva political. diplomacy and media wars

  5. According to Journalist Ghassan al Shamy, the Syrian delegation had the full right to withdraw from Geneva 2 yesterday when john Kerry said that the US administration was going to provide weapons to the non extremists factions of the opposition, and this because Kerry by revealing this, went against Geneva 1 considered as a basis and a reference to Geneva 2 . Not only the Syrian delegation did not withdraw, but today they admitted that they were ready to discuss Geneva 1 with the opposition . This is to say that the weapons have already reached the opposition through Jordan and they are not light weapons , they are anti tank missiles to be used against the Syrian army and the congress had already adopted this resolution previously weeks ago..

  6. The Syrian delegation in Geneva 2 accepts to make Geneva 1 as a reference

  7. I don’t see a diplomatic war happening in Geneva . i see that this was a joint staged event by Russia and USA which outcome and failure was known . Don’t talk to me about diplomatic wars .

    • Who said its a joint staged event by USA and Burkina Faso!!!!!. Everybody, except you, knows that it will be followed by Geneva 3, 4 … and will end in Damuscus.

  8. this whole conference was arranged by Russia and this in itself is a big Russian achievement to gather more than 40 countries , when could Russia ever achieve such a thing weren’t it for what Syria has achieved ?

  9. I prefer to call them NATO proxy Army or NATO THUGS instead of terrorists , they are not on their own as far as i know , they are not some dark forces or Takfiris or Wahabis . They serve someone and work for the World Order and Israel .

    According to Amir Moussawi Iran was invited to attend Geneva 2 by the US administration and to remain in the back stage but Iran refused such unofficial participation.

    • السيد حسن نصر الله – سننتصر في المعركة ضد الإرهاب التكفيري بإذن الله

      “They are not some dark forces or Takfiris or Wahabis”

      It is stupid trying to convince you, you know better than the Seyyed. Did I said they are working for their own? 


      “Moussawi Iran was invited to attend Geneva 2 by the US administration and to remain in the back stage but Iran refused such unofficial participation.”
      Iran did the right thing, especially, they know, the Syrian don’t need a “FORD” sitting on the backroom.

    • The so-called terrorist:
      45

  10. I am sorry to say your “analysis” is BS.

    “The attendance of Geneva 2 on behalf of Syria cannot be interpreted except that it has been designed by US and Russia to lead nowhere “ 

    As we say in Arabic; you discovered hot water (اكتشفت المية السخنة)

    “Maybe the goal is to consecrate Geneva one as a reference and to embarrass thus the Syrian leadership or it is in order to turn the thugs of the NATO from terrorists into a decent accepted opposition and part of the Syrian condition.” 

    Please decide are they terrorists OR, “So-called Terrorists”

    “Iran has refused to attend the conference”
    Are you sure?? 

    “Otherwise how to explain the fact that things are not moving one inch in any direction ? Not only nothing has been achieved on the ground, but nothing is expected to be achieved.”  

    It is stupid to assume That Geneva 2 would achieve peace, or peace may be achieved with the so-called opposition present in Geneva 2. Whats going in Geneva is a war by diplomatic means. GET IT DANIEL.

    The Ground is not Geneva, its QUSAYR, Qalamoun, Aleppo Etc…
    Read it Daniel. Al-Manar calls the “So-called terrorist”, TERRORISTS.

    “The four points presented today by the Syrian delegation with respect to the sovereignty and independence of the Syrian State tries to show that there is give and take and some progress , but this is very unlikely . This has all been orchestrated by Russia and the opposition has rejected all four points . Thus , the outcome on the negotiation table will be zero .” 

    The four points were presented by Assad long ago by Assad in his famous Opera speech. The Syrian state is not trying to show give and take. Syria diplomatic army succeeded in Exposing the so called opposition as traitor, terrorists and tools for the new order. GET IT DANIEL.

    “The real outcome is being cooked elsewhere and the choices are not many . In order to continue to rule , Assad who agreed to shift the battle – according to Russia’s instructions – would have to present concessions not only to US but to Russia as well and this has already started in approving of the Egyptian military coup in Egypt and in turning the war against NATO and Israel into a war against Terrorism.”

    BS. I am sure you don’t want Jarba to rule. 
    The battle was and still is against the Terrorist world order, represented by its tools. I am not exaggerating in saying russia is shifting the battle – according to Assad’s “instructions” . Russia is not a charity, Syria is a Russian national constant, Syria is uniting the Russian union behind Putin. Get it Daniel. Zoom out.

    Finally do think that Nassralla, in sitting with Jeaja, Hariri, Jumblate was looking to rule Lebanon, or to save Lebanon?. Consistency Daniel….Please.




Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: