Ziad Fadel

(Thanks, Brigitte Tulan)

ALEPPO:  The Western Media doesn’t want to talk about this.  But, it’s true.  The Saudis pretend it can’t happen. The Erdoghani Turks pretend they’re fighting terrorists and watch helplessly as the Syrian Army takes care of their business.

The terrorist forces in Aleppo are starving.  Their medical situation is grim, at best.  4,000 newly injected rodents from Turkey have not been able to penetrate Syrian Army lines and are marginalized outside the city, evidently unaware that the final push is about to start.  Once Aleppo is liberated, there will be no point in continuing that charade in Geneva.

(Thanks, Khaled)

Putin tried to send a message of peace to the so-called “opposition”.  With a cease fire in place, it behooved the exiled and impotent Saudi-financed traitors to perhaps find some modus vivendi with the government in Damascus.  Instead, they pursued the same knuckle-headed bedouin-minded policy of demanding the impossible – the ouster of the Assad government.  Now that Putin understands the inability of the opposition to absorb reality, the decision has been made to go for it all at once.

Some media in the West claim that the Syrian government and its supporters in Russia never had the intention of abiding by any cease fire or negotiating in good faith at Geneva.  The West confounded logic by asserting that the Syrian military used the short, two-month respite from hostilities to reorganize and resupply.  Interestingly, in Syria, the military has taken the position that the cease fire was a bad idea from the start because it gave the terrorists and their supporters time to build up their capabilities in order to block the SAA advances at the crucial city of Aleppo.  Whatever the case may be, the cease fire is at an end and the grim business of eradicating the pestilence in the north is proceeding apace.

Al-Raashideen:  This large suburb is in ruins and very few humans live inside it at present.  Yesterday, the Syrian Army moved decisively into Block 4 and is involved at present in an intense battle with terrorist rodents who have almost run out of ammunition.  Monitored terrorist chatter describes an hopeless situation with “jihadists” asking their litter-mates to pray for them since they are about to die.  Morituri, sort of.  Their prayers will be answered soon enough.  The bearded nihilists are being hit with everything from mortars, rockets and bombers.  It is impossible for them to survive.

In point of fact, a look at the map will disclosed the near complete encirclement of Aleppo.  Any news source which speaks of a narrow channel for resupply is lying.  It’s over and all corridors into the city have been closed.

The West continues to spew nonsense.  With no credible evidence of chemical weapons use by a Syrian government which has been confirmed to have cooperated completely with the Russian-inspired policy of CW divestiture, the Western Media has turned to inventing lies about Russian or Syrian Air Force bombing of “hospitals” in “terrorist-controlled areas” of the city. What benefit to the propaganda media is unclear since nobody is interested in an actual ground invasion of Syria.

The field hospital in Al-Sukkari largely run by the terrorist-supporting gangsters at Doctors Without Borders was hit because it was being used by Alqaeda to hide weapons and terrorists.  It was not a pediatric hospital by any means.  It was a haven for murderers.  All scenes showing children inside the terrorist field hospital are taken from archival photos.  There are no pediatricians there.  There are only wounded terrorists who must die anyways.


Bashar Murtada shows us how civilians are being murdered by Obama’s freaks:

The terrorists have received more lethal weapons and they’re using it against innocent civilians.  The day before yesterday, they deliberately targeted areas of the city known for their large minority populations.  Quarters like Al-‘Azeeziyya, Mogambo and Sulaymaaniyya received some direct hits.  This has been calculated by the Syrian military.  It is known that the terrorists will often fire at civilians in secure zones as a way to respond to the army’s constant advances on the ground.  It is a price the population of Aleppo has to pay in order to be rid of the plague spread by Obama.

The highway which circles the city is under complete army control.  The process of liberating Aleppo is now strictly defined by slow strangulation.  The Kuwayris air base is operating at a very high level with bombers and helicopters taking off and landing every ten minutes.  Access to the base is unimpeded.

During the last 3 days of fighting, the Syrian Army with Russian help has killed over 200 rodents with hundreds known to be wounded and without any hope of medical care.  Doctors inside government-held areas are warned not to leave their areas for any reason.  There is a fear that doctors are being targeted for kidnaping by the terrorists in order to compel them to treat wounded rodents.  Doctors are being told that if they travel about the city, they do so at their own risk.  Doctors are also not allowed to transport drugs or anything which might help wounded rats.

The cease fire in Aleppo has failed because the terrorist groups cooperated with Nusra/Alqaeda by giving the Saudi-financed terrorist gang cover.  Since Alqaeda and ISIS are not a part of the cessation of hostilities agreement, the group had to find a way to both maneuver around the northern territories while being protected under the agreement.  Both the Syrian and Russian governments began to pick up on this stratagem and viewed it as delusionary.  Russia is now seeking the concurrence of the U.N.S.C. in the inclusion of Jaysh Al-Islam and Ahraar Al-Shaam as excluded groups.

Interestingly,  the Syrian Ministry of Defense announced today a cease fire for 24 hours in the East Ghoutaa.  They also announced a cease fire for 72 hours in Latakia.  I have no explanation why this agreement released to the media.



Brigitte Turkmani sent me this tape about a commander with ISIS:

Afraa Dagher tells us about Aleppo here:

Children murdered and maimed by Obama’s psychopathic moderate cannibals in Aleppo. (Thanks, Samer Hussein)

(Thanks, Brigitte Tulan)


(It means: “Coeur de Leon”.  Thanks, Brigitte Tulan)


(Thanks, Khaled Nawaz Al-Nouri)





John Esq. and Tony Gratrex send this eye-opening article in which Seymour Hersh claims Hillary Clinton approved Sarin gas for terrorists:

Brandon Turbeville attacks the questionable role of Saudi Arabia as enemy of radical Jihadist Islam in this article:

Obama’s charade is exposed by Brandon here with a well-studied analysis of Obama’s gibberish:

Brandon uses SyrPer’s depiction of the Parliamentary elections in Syria to buttress the argument that Syria is in fact becoming a democracy:


WILE E. COYOTE MOMENT:  (Thanks, John Esq.)  Watch ISIS’s impersonation of the Keystone Cops:

Watch Jund Al-Aqsa rodents get wiped out by SAA soldiers after they think they had neutralized the SAA force.  Great scene from Aleppo and John Esq.:
Read more 

UK Labour Party in Grip of Zionist Inquisition

April 30, 2016  /  Gilad Atzmon

 by Stuart Littlewood

The orchestrated smear campaign against pro-Palestine sympathisers sent me reaching for my pen. But Gilad Atzmon too was eyeing the Labour Party’s crazed witch hunt for “antisemites” with misgiving and had already declared, in his usual robust way, that Labour under Jeremy Corbyn was not so much a party as a piece of Zionist-occupied territory.

Writing in his blog about Corbyn and McDonnell’s servile commitment to expel anyone whose remarks might be interpreted by Zionist mafioso as hateful or simply upsetting to Jews, Atzmon concludes: “Corbyn’s Labour is now unequivocally a spineless club of Sabbos Goyim” [which I take to mean non-Jewish dogsbodies who do menial jobs that Jews are forbidden to do for religious reasons].

“The Labour party’s policies,” says Atzmon, “are now compatible with Jewish culture: intolerant to the core and concerned primarily with the imaginary suffering of one people only. These people are not the working class, they are probably the most privileged ethnic group in Britain.  Corbyn’s Labour is a Zionist Occupied Territory…  It proves my theses that the Left is not a friend to Palestine, the oppressed or the workless people.

“I would have never believed that Jeremy Corbyn would engage in such colossally treacherous politics. I did not anticipate that Corbyn would become a Zionist lapdog.  Corbyn was a great hope to many of us. I guess that the time has come to accept that The Left is a dead concept, it has nothing to offer.”

This writer too is shocked after signing up a supporter (though not a member) of the Labour Party with the express purpose of voting in the leadership election for that beacon of common sense, that staunch champion of high ideals, that great white hope who would start a revolution in British politics and sweep away the crap and corruption left behind by Blair and Brown.

Boy, was I in for a disappointment!

And the latest casualty in this ugly Zionist power-play is former mayor of London Ken Livingstone. In a heated public spat with one of the party’s chief inquisitors, MP John Mann, he had the temerity to defend a female MP, Naz Shah, who had fallen foul of the party’s antisemitism police for comments made on Facebook before becoming an MP. She had suggested that Israel be transferred to the United States. She apologised profusely, but Labour’s Israel lobby went ballistic after raking up this old remark. Had they forgotten that their hero, David Ben-Gurion, himself, was mad-keen on population transfer… of Palestinian Arabs, that is? So what’s to get excited about? Mann happens to be chair of the All-Party Parliamentary Group on Antisemitism. One-sidedness is the name of his game.

What seems to have generated greatest sound and fury is this observation by Livingstone: “When Hitler won his election in 1932 his policy then was that Jews should be moved to Israel. He was supporting Zionism before he went mad and ended up killing six million Jews.”

Joan Ryan MP, Chair of Labour Friends of Israel, said: “To speak of Zionism – the right of the Jewish people to self-determination – and Hitler in the same sentence is quite breathtaking. I am appalled that Ken Livingstone has chosen to do so…. He should be suspended from the Labour Party immediately.”

It scarcely needs saying that Zionism may mean self-determination for the Jewish people but it has cruelly denied the Palestinians their right to self-determination for decades. Nevertheless Livingstone is suspended from the party after 47 years.

President of the Board of Deputies of British Jews Jonathan Arkush can be relied on to put in his two-pennyworth on these occasions, and he didn’t disappoint: “Ken Livingston’s comments were abhorrent and beyond disgraceful.  His latest comments combine Holocaust revisionism with antisemitism denial, when the evidence is there for all to see.  He lacks any sense of decency.  He must now be expelled from the Labour Party.”

And on the suspension of Naz Shah, Arkush was in overdrive: “If the Labour party is to re-establish its credibility on this issue, it needs to take four important steps forward:

First, there must be a credible inquiry into the entire Naz Shah episode.  Secondly, the party has to take effective measures to eradicate antisemitism wherever it occurs within its membership.  Thirdly, the leader must make it clear that allegations of antisemitism are not to be dismissed as arguments about Israel.  Fourthly, Jeremy Corbyn must now respond to our repeated calls for him to accept that his meetings with rank antisemites before he became leader were not appropriate and will not be repeated.

Witch hunters’ balloon pricked

Whether Livingstone’s claim that Hitler was a Zionist is correct, I know not and care not. He presumably checked his facts and was itching to score with this mischievous titbit. Whether that was a wise thing to do is a matter for idle chatter, not expulsion. Meanwhile Zio hotheads inside and outside the party would do well to pay attention to the The Jewish Socialists’ Group, which has some sound advice for them and sticks a pin in their not-so-pretty balloon with this measured statement:

Antisemitism and anti-Zionism are not the same. Zionism is a political ideology which has always been contested within Jewish life since it emerged in 1897, and it is entirely legitimate for non-Jews as well as Jews to express opinions about it, whether positive or negative. Not all Jews are Zionists. Not all Zionists are Jews.

Criticism of Israeli government policy and Israeli state actions against the Palestinians is not antisemitism. Those who conflate criticism of Israeli policy with antisemitism, whether they are supporters or opponents of Israeli policy, are actually helping the antisemites. We reject any attempt, from whichever quarter, to place legitimate criticism of Israeli policy out of bounds.

Accusations of antisemitism are currently being weaponised to attack the Jeremy Corbyn-led Labour party with claims that Labour has a “problem” of antisemitism. This is despite Corbyn’s longstanding record of actively opposing fascism and all forms of racism, and being a firm supporter of the rights of refugees and of human rights globally.

A very small number of such cases seem to be real instances of antisemitism. Others represent genuine criticism of Israeli policy and support for Palestinian rights, but expressed in clumsy and ambiguous language, which may unknowingly cross a line into antisemitism. Further cases are simply forthright expressions of support for Palestinian rights, which condemn Israeli government policy and aspects of Zionist ideology, and have nothing whatsoever to do with antisemitism.

The JSG goes further and suggests that the attacks come from four main sources – the Conservative Party, Conservative-supporting media and pro-Zionist Israeli media sources, right-wing and pro-Zionist elements claiming to speak on behalf of the Jewish community, and opponents of Jeremy Corbyn within the Labour party. These groups make common cause to wreck the Corbyn leadership, divert attention from Israeli government crimes and discredit those who dare to criticise Israeli policy or the Zionist enterprise.

In short, the JSG says what needs to be said and puts the witchfinder-generals firmly in their place.

Of course, if Labour – or the Conservatives – truly wished to be squeaky-clean in matters of racism they would disband their Israel fan clubs (i.e. Friends of Israel) and suspend all who refuse to condemn Israel’s brutal acts of ethnic cleansing and other war crimes. If people holding public office put themselves in a position where they are influenced by a foreign military power, they flagrantly breach the Principles of Public Life. There are far too many Labour and Conservative MPs and MEPs who fall into that category.

The Labour Party announced today it is considering reviewing its rules to send a clear message of zero-tolerance on antisemitism. For balance, why not match this with zero-tolerance of those who use the party as a platform for promoting the criminal Israeli regime and its continuing territorial ambitions? Go on, Labour, prove Atzmon wrong… prove the party is not Zionist occupied territory.





Stuart Littlewood’s book Radio Free Palestine, with Foreword by Jeff Halper, can now be read on the internet by visiting other articles by Stuart.

Obama Announces More Special Forces Troops To Syria, Escalates Existing Policy

obama syria

By Brandon Turbeville

In yet another sign of obvious Western escalation in the war against Syria, U.S. President Barack Obama announced on Monday that an additional 250 American military personnel will be deployed to Syria under the guise of defeating ISIS.

In his speech at Hannover, Germany, Obama stated:

Just as I approved additional support for Iraqi forces against ISIL, I’ve decided to increase U.S. support for local forces fighting ISIL in Syria, a small number of special operations forces are already on the ground in Syria and their expertise has been critical as local forces have driven ISIL out of key areas.

So given their success I’ve approved the deployment of up to 250 additional U.S. personnel in Syria including special forces to keep up this momentum.

Obama made a point to state that the troops will not be “leading the fight on the ground” but will be engaged in “training” and providing “assistance” to local forces.

 Obama also restated the U.S. position that “Assad must go” when he said, “Just as we remain relentless on the military front we’re not going to give up on diplomacy to end the civil war in Syria because the suffering of the people in Syria has to end and that requires an effective political transition.”

CNN reports that

The troops will be expanding the ongoing U.S. effort to bring more Syrian Arab fighters into units the U.S. supports in northern Syria that have largely been manned by the Kurds, an official told CNN earlier.

The plan calls for the additional U.S. forces to “advise and assist” forces in the area whom the U.S. hopes may eventually grow strong enough to take back territory around Raqqa, Syria, where ISIS is based.

These troops are not expected to engage in combat operations or to participate in target-to-kill teams but will be armed to defend themselves, one official said.

. . . . .

The official said the President was persuaded to take this additional step because of recent successes against ISIS.

What these statements mean, of course, is that the United States is deploying troops to better assist, train, and organize the terrorists on the ground who are fighting Assad and the Syrian military. After all, these “fighters that the U.S. supports” are nothing more than ISIS, al-Qaeda, FSA, Nusra, and other numerous groups and groupiscules that are ideologically identical to one another and whose only real tangible difference is the names they themselves.

Not only that, any talk of “recent successes against ISIS” is clearly not the successes of the United States, NATO, or the anti-Syria coalition. They are the successes of Syria, Iran, Hezbollah, and Russia. Indeed, the latter forces have achieved in weeks what the former could not achieve in over a year (ten years according to the U.S.), a true testament to what can be achieved when one actually targets the terrorist organization as opposed to supporting it.

Still, it is important to point out that, regardless of Obama’s recent announcement, U.S. Special Forces have been present in Syria for quite some time, with NATO member Special Forces known publicly even earlier.

In October, 2015, it was announced by the White House that 50 Special Forces troops would be sent to Syria. This announcement came days after it was reported that U.S. Special Forces commandos were working with Kurdish forces to “free prisoners of the Islamic State” in Syria. Later, the presence of U.S. Special Forces in Syria was tacitly acknowledged in 2015 when the U.S. took credit for the killing of Abu Sayyaf.

Reports circulated in October, 2014 that U.S. soldiers and Special Forces troops were fighting alongside Kurdish battalions in Kobane. An article by Christof Lehmann published in March 20, 2015 stated,

Evidence about the presence of U.S. special forces in the Syrian town Ayn al-Arab a.k.a. Kobani emerged. Troops are guiding U.S. airstrikes as part of U.S support for the Kurdish separatist group PYD and the long-established plan to establish a Kurdish corridor.

A photo taken in Ayn al-Arab shows three U.S. soldiers. One of them “Peter” is carrying a Bushnell laser rangefinder, an instrument designed to mark targets for U.S. jets, reports Ceyhun Bozkurt for Aydinlik Daily.

The photo substantiated previous BBC interviews with U.S. soldiers who are fighting alongside the Kurdish separatist group PYD in Syria.

The photo of the three U.S. troopers also substantiates a statement by PYD spokesman Polat Can from October 14, 2014, reports Aydinlik Daily. Can admitted that a special unit in Kobani provides Kurdish fighters with the coordinates of targets which then would be relayed to “coalition forces”.

The first public U.S. Special Forces raid in Syria took place in July, 2014 when Delta Force personnel allegedly attempted to rescue several Americans being held by ISIS near Raqqa. Allegedly, the soldiers stormed the facility but the terrorists had already moved the hostages. While the raid would provide evidence that U.S. Special Forces were operating in Syria in 2014, many researchers believe the story is simply fabricated by the White House to provide legitimacy to the stories of murdered hostages and thus the subsequent pro-war propagandathat ensued as well as to promote the gradual acceptance of U.S. troops on the ground in Syria.

In 2012, an article published in the Daily Star by Deborah Sherwood revealed that SAS Special Forces and MI6 agents were operating inside Syria shortly after the destabilization campaign began in earnest. Sherwood writes,

Special Forces will help ­protect the refugees in Syria along the borders.

Last week as the president ignored an international ceasefire, plans were being finalised to ­rescue thousands of Syrians.

SAS troops and MI6 agents are in the country ready to help rebels if civil war breaks out as ­expected this weekend.

They also have ­hi-tech satellite computers and radios that can instantly send back photos and details of refugees and ­Assad’s forces as the situation develops.

Whitehall sources say it is vital they can see what is ­happening on the ground for ­themselves so Assad cannot deny atrocities or battles.

And if civil war breaks out the crack troops are on hand to help with fighting, said the ­insider.

. . . . .

“Safe havens would be an invasion of Syria but a chance to save lives,” said a senior Whitehall source.

“The SAS will throw an armed screen round these areas that can be set up within hours.

“There are guys in the communications unit who are signallers that can go right up front and get ­involved in close-quarter fighting.”

In addition, in March 2012, it was reported by Lebanon’s Daily Starthat 13 French intelligence agents had been captured by the Syrian government, proving not only that Western Special Ops presence in Syria did, in fact, exist but also that it existed essentially from the start.

Thus, the presence of NATO Special Forces and U.S. Special Forces specifically are nothing new at all. Obama’s announcement is simply the advertisement of a policy that is gradually escalating in regards to Syria and, as a result, threatens to provoke a direct confrontation between the United States and Russia.


Image Credit

Brandon Turbeville – article archive here – is the author of seven books, Codex Alimentarius — The End of Health Freedom, 7 Real Conspiracies, Five Sense Solutions and Dispatches From a Dissident, volume 1 andvolume 2, The Road to Damascus: The Anglo-American Assault on Syria, and The Difference it Makes: 36 Reasons Why Hillary Clinton Should Never Be President. Turbeville has published over 650 articles on a wide variety of subjects including health, economics, government corruption, and civil liberties. Brandon Turbeville’s radio show Truth on The Tracks can be found every Monday night 9 pm EST at UCYTV. His website is He is available for radio and TV interviews. Please contact activistpost (at)

This article may be freely shared in part or in full with author attribution and source link.

The Truth Behind the Israel-Palestinian Conflict

Don’t let the Zionists try to tell you how “complex” the situation is in the Middle East. It’s really as simple as this.

Imad Alshoaabi: Obama Doctrine

Terror in Aleppo: Russia Calls for al-Qaeda Allies to be Named as Terrorists; US Refuses

In the view of Paul Craig Roberts, “World War III has already begun,” we just haven’t moved into the hot stage yet. Hard to say whether Roberts is correct, and perhaps it’s mostly a matter of subjectivity, but of course there are always signs of concern. In fact, we’re seeing them on practically a daily basis.

China has just refused permission for a US aircraft carrier to enter Hong Kong, while Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov has again expressed concerns over US efforts to establish military bases on its borders–this time in comments to a Swedish newspaper, where efforts are underway to bring Sweden into NATO.

There have also been reports in the past couple of days of Russia intercepting a US spy plane in the far east, near the Kamchatka Peninsula.

And then, of course, there is Syria, where terrorists presumably backed by Turkey have been raining death and destruction down upon the city of Aleppo. In the video above we see an Aleppo resident who a month ago lost his two sons as well as his hand and forearm to terrorist shelling of his neighborhood. As Eva Bartlett writes:

Two days ago, a friend in Aleppo messaged me: “Aleppo is burning. Numerous shells.”

He was not referring to the lies found in corporate media on Aleppo, but instead to the unreported reality: foreign-backed terrorists have continued mortaring, rocketing, hell-cannoning Aleppo’s residential areas.

In the past few days, Senator Richard Black has been visiting Syria. Black is not a US senator, he is only a state senator in Virginia, but he is one of the few American politicians willing to speak the truth about Syria. In the video below he states it very succinctly when he says, “There are no moderate rebels, there are simply terrorists.” He also makes some interesting comments about the Syrian elections as well as the Syrian Constitution–information you certainly will never hear in the mainstream media.

Like most decent Americans, Black is appalled–not only by what is taking place in Syria but by the responsibility our own government bears for it. You can go hereto read more about Black’s visit to Syria, including additional videos as well as a gallery of photos.

I have said this before, but perhaps it can’t be repeated often enough: the conflict in Syria is not a “civil war.” It is a foreign invasion using terrorist mercenaries, in many cases trained and equipped by the US, as proxies. And now we are seeing additional US troops, special operations forces, being sent into Syria as well, this despite Obama’s earlier promise of “no boots on the ground.”

Of course, it isn’t only the US that has inserted its stick into the spokes.  Israel has been yammering for the overthrow of Syria’s president for a while now. And there is abundant evidence ( here, here, here, here, here, and here, for example) that the Zionist state has been among the supporters of the terrorist invasion of Syria. Israeli Defense Minister Moshe Ya’alon even said he would “prefer” ISIS to Iran.

All of this should be kept in mind in trying to evaluate the confused policies of the US government, and particularly the fickle John Kirby’s befuddled discombobulations in the video above. As the RT reporter comments, “The way many people see it when they hear these confusing statements is that the Obama administration does not want to admit that it changed its strategy in Syria.” Perhaps what it comes down to is that the Obama administration has changed its strategy in Syria because it has been ordered to do so.



In Syria, US Rejects Russia Call to Name al-Qaeda Allies ‘Terroris’


By Daniel McAdams

Originally Appeared at Ron Paul Institute

The total muddle that is US policy toward Syria continues to astonish. This week we saw the spectacle of a State Department Spokesman telling us that President Obama’s promise to not put US boots on the ground in Syria, was never a promise not to put boots on the ground in Syria. Yes, it was funny to see him squirm, but there is nothing funny about the past five years of disastrous policy in Syria. Particularly considering the thousands killed once the US decided that “Assad must go” and began sending in fighters to make that happen.

Now we see the extraordinary situation where the US government admits that the militia groups Jaish al-Islam and Ahrar al-Sham are fighting alongside and are “intermingled with” al-Qaeda’s Nusra Front, but resoundingly rejects the Russian request to therefore classify these two groups terrorist.

In fact, not only does fighting alongside and “intermingling with” al-Qaeda not get a group classified “terrorist,” the US government is actually asking Russia and the Syrian government to stop shooting at such groups!

Here’s State Department Spokesman Mark Toner making the request:

US wants Russia & not to target terror grps AhrarSham & Jaish al-Islam even though they fight alongside Nusra

 So the State Department is urging the Syrians and Russians to stop bombing Aleppo because Jaish al-Islam and Ahrar al-Sham are operating there, even though it also admits that the groups are “intermingling” with al-Qaeda’s Nusra Front.

But it gets even more bizarre, as Pentagon Spokesman Col. Steve Warren said last week in a press briefing that “it’s primarily al-Nusra who holds Aleppo.”

Why does the State Department urge a cessation of hostilities against the forces holding Aleppo while the Pentagon tells us that it is primarily al-Qaeda’s Nusra Front that is in charge of Aleppo?

Do either of them know what’s going on there?

State Department Spokesman John Kirby tries to explain it away by telling us that because Jaish al-Islam and Ahrar al-Sham are also present (intermingling with Nusra Front — “because they want to be near one another”), there should be no Russian or Syrian attack on Aleppo.

But in a February 22 press briefing, State Department Spokesman Mark Toner explicitly stated that groups who fight alongside al-Nusra Front or other terrorist groups in Syria would be legitimate military targets!

Asked whether the groups fighting alongside al-Nusra in Syria should be considered military targets, Toner made it clear that such actions opened them up to being targeted:

Again, that’s for them to – frankly, to resolve. I mean, if they’re going to be – I mean, they cannot – we have been very clear that – we, the ISSG, have been very clear in saying that al-Nusrah and Daesh are not part of any kind of ceasefire or any kind of negotiated cessation of hostilities. So if you hang out with the wrong folks, then you make that decision.

Is this all coming through clearly? Doesn’t it feel like they are making it up as they go?

Secret Meetings between Zionist, Saudi Officials: Report

Local Editor

A new report emerged this week on the ties between the Zionist entity and Gulf countries, on top of which is Saudi Arabia.

Israeli daily, Maariv disclosed that Zionist and Saudi officials held sec ret meetings in the last three years.

Secret Meetings between Zionist, Saudi Officials: Report

The meeting, which took place in Roma, Czechoslovakia and India, touched upon mutual challenges facing Saudi and Zionist entity, according to the daily.

Maariv said that these challenges are the “regional stability and Iran as a mutual enemy.”

Saudi Ambassador in Washington, Anwar Eshki, met Israeli Foreign Ministry director-general Dore Gold, the daily said, noting that the officials agreed a peace deal between Riyadh and Tel Aviv is not far.

High-ranking Israeli officials are moving freely in Arab capitals in an unprecedented way, Maariv reported.

“We can’t ignore the mutual interest recently developed between Israel and several Gulf countries,” the daily said, citing a poll conducted in Saudi Arabia this year, showing that most Saudis are allegedly  “concerned about Iran more than being concerned about Israel.”

Source: Al Manar TV

29-04-2016 – 15:12 Last updated 29-04-2016 – 15:12

Related Articles

%d bloggers like this: