USA seeks to drive regime-change by starving the people of Syria


30 June 2020 

By:Reneva Fourie

The United States of America has intensified its economic warfare against the people of Syria. Battered by a 9-year war that resulted in investment and capital flight; and infrastructure and industry destruction, Covid-19 came as a heavy blow to the ailing Syrian economy. The most devastating however has been the ongoing, escalating, illegally imposed USA-driven, and European Union supported, sanctions against Syria. 

Sanctions barring USA-based companies from trading with Syria were imposed in 2004. In 2011 it was extended to include the financial and energy sectors (this while the USA pillages Syrian oil daily; an act that has been designated as illegal under international law and the rules of war, yet there are no repercussions). On Wednesday, June 17, 2020 the sanctions provisions of the USA so-called ‘Caesar’ Civilian Protection Act of 2019, which extends sanctions to all foreign firms or countries that deal with the government of Syria, came into force.

The government of Syria had largely managed to control their weakening currency during the war, despite its domestic challenges. The value of the currency, however, plummeted over the past three weeks in anticipation, and due to the implementation of, the ‘Caesar’ Act.  The Syrian Pound (SYP), which was trading at around SYP 47 (about R ) to the dollar prior to the war, is now, as at end June 2020, hovering around SYP 2 500 to the dollar.

The impact of these sanctions on the quality of life of the Syrian people has been disastrous. According to UNDP data, Syria’s human development index was on the rise between 2000 and 2010.

The IMF outlook for 2010 was as follows, “The outlook for 2010 points to an overall strengthening in economic performance. The ongoing recovery in Syria’s trading partners is expected to contribute to a gradual increase in exports, remittances, and FDI in 2010.” The currency was beginning to appreciate against the dollar. But the gains made during those years were reversed by the war and subsequent sanctions, and the country experienced a drop of nearly 60 percent in GNI per capita from 2010 to 2016.

As political stability in the country increased recently, the economy was once again beginning to show signs of recovery. Sadly, the ‘Caesar’ Act, will cause a major setback.

Syria, home of some of the oldest cities in the world, has a highly sophisticated and cultured populace, who have relatives across the world. Sanctions have compelled them to do much of their banking, particularly that of an international nature, from Lebanon. Most Syrians have relatives in Lebanon due to the historic ties between the two countries.

Traveling between the two countries is a common practice and goods and medication that could not be accessed in Syria due to sanctions, were still obtainable in Lebanon. All that has now come to an abrupt halt.

Covid-19 has made travel across borders difficult; but threats of sanctions against Lebanon, which has its own economic crisis that pre-dates Covid-19, for trading with Syria, will be the final nail in the coffin. Syria is unable to repair the power stations and water infrastructure that was damaged during the war by the West, Israel, Turkey, and insurgents including Isis and al-Qaeda, as they cannot purchase the parts due to sanctions.

Domestic manufacturing of medicines is waning as ingredients cannot be imported. The exemptions around food and medicines touted by the USA and EU are misleading as they apply mostly to areas that remain outside of government control and their “humanitarian aid” in these occupied areas primarily serves to strengthen counter-revolutionary activities.

Exacerbating the cruelty of the general adverse economic impact of sanctions, are the deliberate actions to undermine food security through the regular burning of staple crops by the USA and Turkey-backed mercenaries. For example, Apache helicopters affiliated to the USA occupation forces dropped thermal balloons on barley and wheat crops in a number of villages surrounding al-Shaddadi city, while Turkey-backed mercenaries set fire to a number of wheat and barley fields in Abu Rasin and Tal Tamir towns.

The intention literally is to starve the people of Syria into submission. According to the World Food Programme, as at June 2020, food prices have increased by a staggering 209 percent in the last year, in which most of the increases occurred over the past weeks. This country, where less than 7.5 percent of the population experienced multidimensional poverty in 2009, now has more than 80 percent of its population living below the poverty line, thanks to the USA and its allies. 

The government of Syria has tried to ease the impact of this economic onslaught on its people, who have already suffered tremendous human losses, by broadening access to food parcels, vouchers, subsidised fuel, and government-subsidised grocery shops.  The interventions are however unsustainable. Domestic and international protests calling for the lifting of sanctions in Syria took place regularly over the past two weeks.

But while there have been reports of protests in Syria, almost none of those reports, even from ‘reputable’ entities, state that the protests were AGAINST the USA and its implementation of the Act. The international protests received little coverage.

Sanctions must be lifted. In fact, the USA’s regime-change agenda in Syria must be stopped.

Sanctions are but one aspect of the continued broader regime-change agenda of the USA. The ‘Statement of Policy’ which serves as a preamble to the ‘Caesar’ Act states, “to support a transition to a government in Syria that respects the rule of law, human rights, and peaceful co-existence with its neighbours.”  The last phrase – ‘peaceful co-existence with its neighbours’ – can only refer to Israel, which illegally occupies the Golan and regularly conducts acts of military aggression against Syria.

It must be noted that prior to the war, neither the UNDP nor the IMF made any reference to corruption, maladministration, and human rights abuses in Syria. It became the buzz word when an alleged Syrian military dissenter codenamed Caesar, after whom the USA Act is named, who in 2014 revealed thousands of photographs supposedly depicting torture in Syrian prisons.

An examination of the photos however revealed that it could not be indisputably proven that the injuries depicted in the photographs were indeed inflicted in government prisons.  In fact, the Human Rights Watch found that at least half the photographs depict the bodies of government soldiers killed by the armed opposition.  This confirmed that the opposition is violent and has killed large numbers of Syrian security forces.

The credibility of ‘Caesar’ is highly questionable given the discrepancies in his ‘evidence’ and the USA’s history for fabricating information to suit its interests. Prof Theodore Postol, a respected expert on missile defence and nuclear weapons, who was part of the Joint Investigative Mechanism that investigated allegations of the use of chemical weapons by the Syrian government, disputed the conclusiveness of the allegation. 

Note further that the preamble does not say ‘peaceful transition’, thereby justifying military intervention.  The military situation remains tense despite the cease-fire negotiated between Russia and Turkey in the northwest of the country, as the USA and Turkey continue to reinforce their troops in Syria.

Turkey-backed insurgents and mercenaries continue to engage in motorcycle and car bombs in areas that are outside of the Syrian government’s control.  And Israel regularly invades Lebanese air space to advance missile attacks on the south of Syria.

In addressing the United Nations earlier this month, the Syrian Ambassador, Bashar al-Jaafari stated, “The crimes and practices perpetrated by the governments of those states (the West, Israel and Turkey) rise to the level of war crimes and constitute a violation of the rules of international law and a direct aggression on the sovereignty, safety, independence and territorial integrity of Syria.”

The continued aggression in Syria cannot be delinked from other developments in the region.  The Israeli government continues to persecute the people of Palestine and is determined to forge ahead with implementing the Trump ‘Deal of the Century’. Tension between Lebanon and Israel remains high.  And USA-led sanctions against Iran remain. 

The USA-Israeli-Turkey alliance with their allies continue to seek hegemony in the region, supposedly to reduce the influence of Iran, Russia, and China. Their relentless aggression has however cost this region too many lives.  The people of the region have also suffered too much due to sanctions. Their actions are tantamount to genocide.

As we join the global demand for an end to racism, we should also call for a just and peaceful world. Implementation of this demand begins with a call for all USA troops to exit West Asia, as well as an end to Israeli aggression in the Middle East.

* Reneva Fourie is a policy analyst specialising in governance, development and security and currently resides in Damascus, Syria.She is also a member of the Central Committee of the South African Communist Party.

This article was first published by Independent  Online,South Africa  

Reem Haddad 


Related Articles

One Response

  1. The END of this “AGE” – The New World Order! It is the EDOMITE JEWS who are bringing the N.W.O. about!

    Esdras 6:9 …”For Esau is the end of this age, and Jacob is the beginning of the age that follows”…

    2 Esdras 6:9 Context

    6Then did I consider these things, and they all were made through me alone, and through none other: by me also they shall be ended, and by none other. 7Then answered I and said, What shall be the parting asunder of the times? or when shall be the end of the first, and the beginning of it that followeth? 8And he said unto me, From Abraham unto Isaac, when Jacob and Esau were born of him, Jacob’s hand held first the heel of Esau. 9For Esau is the end of the world, and Jacob is the beginning of it that followeth. 10The hand of man is betwixt the heel and the hand: other question, Esdras, ask thou not. 11I answered then and said, O Lord that bearest rule, if I have found favour in thy sight, 12I beseech thee, shew thy servant the end of thy tokens, whereof thou shewedst me part the last night.

    The Jews are of Esau from Idumea, and therefore not of Israel or Judah; Jewish Encyclopedia, 1925, vol. 5, page 41.

    The SYNAGOGUE Of SATAN: EDOMS Playground

    As most understand, a lie repeated often enough, becomes in the minds of the people, the TRUTH! Some lies have been so well established and substantiated with a ‘little truth’, that when we question what we believe, we find these little ‘blocks of stumbling’ that have been placed in the way of our understanding! Many times we are unaware of what to question, or what questions to ask! Much of what we need to understand has been ‘Demonized’ as crazy or removed so far from our view/interest by the cries of anti Semite and Racist! (No one wants that association). So how do we unlearn the lies we believe, and how do we know what is a little truth, and how much of what we believe is a lie?
    Behind every lie is a motive! When we are taught a lie, and repeat it, we are then unwittingly made liars by proxy. We had no motive to lie, but by repeating the lie the motive is fulfilled. It’s like when our parents lied to us about Santa Clause, they did not repeat that lie with the motive that the lie was created.

    2 John 10-11 “If there come any unto you, and bring not this doctrine, (that Jesus is the Son of God), receive him not into your house, neither bid him God speed (give him no help in any way), for he that biddeth him God speed (gives help) is PARTAKER IN HIS EVIL DEEDS.” This seems mighty plain to me! It means, Christian, that if you send financial aid to the Israeli, or even pray for their well being, God will hold you responsible for their murder of innocent Arabs in Palestine, and for their atrocities against a helpless people. Think well on these things and then try and get your pastor to give you a scriptural answer for the sin he commits, when he tells you to help the anti-Christs!
    The meaning for the words JUDAH/Judahite and JUDEAN have been “altered” to “FIT” the modern misuse of the word JEW. Jew is the ‘bastardization’ of the word JUDAH. The simple addition of the word, ‘JEWISH’ is a perversion of the Original TEXT. The addition and use of the word ‘JEW’ is for confusion and deception, as with word GENTILE!

    In the Old Testament, the Hebrew word is; …”Strongs Concordance. 3063 “Yehuwdah” …”The name of Five Israeli Also of the tribe descended from the first, and of its territory: Judah”…
    S.C. 3064 “Yehuwdiy ‘patron from 3063; a Jehudite (i.e. Judaite or Jew), or desc. of Jehudah (i.e. Judah):-Jew”…

    In Zechariah 8:23 “Thus saith the Lord of hosts; In those days it shall come to pass, that ten men shall take hold out of all languages of the nations, even shall take hold of the skirt of him that is a Jew, saying, We will go with you: for we have heard that God is with you.” …” it is S.C.  376 + 3064 Which is “Man” of “Judah”…

    In the New Testament. The word Jew mentioned in. John 4:22″ …for Salvation is of the Jews”. is RIGHTLY translated from the GREEK S.C. 2453 it is; “Ioudaios”, pronounced ee-oo-dah-yos and means “JUDEAN; AS A COUNTRY i.e.belonging to Judea” ‘FROM’ S.C. 2448 and 2455″….

    THAT is ALL that is found in the Strong’s Concordance from 1980. Nothing omitted and nothing added!

    The on-line Blueletter has it as follows, which is not a deception on Blueletter’s part, but is as it is found in the New Revised Strong’s Concordance
    1) Jewish, belonging to the Jewish nation
    2) Jewish as respects to birth, origin, religion

    S.C. 2453 in my Hard Copy shows it is ‘FROM’ S.C. 2448 and 2455.

    As used in Matthew 2:6 S.C. 2448 “Iouda” Judah = “he shall be praised”
    the fourth son of the patriarch Jacob
    the tribe that were the offspring of Judah
    the region occupied by the tribe
    a city of the tribe of Judah,….

    As used in Hebrews 7:14 S.C. 2455 “Ioudas” Judah or Judas = “he shall be praised”
    the fourth son of Jacob
    an unknown ancestor of Christ…..

    Now that is the CORRECT Translation for those that care about the truth! It appears that the word JEW in John 4:22 was NOT “JEW” and should have been “JUDAHITES” Based on what I know about EDOM and the Rothschillds creation, The ILLUMINATI and their ownership and control of the majority of the Publishing House’s and infiltration of the Seminaries, that is how we have the word JEW in our Bibles.
    For more on the Historical Facts concerning the word “JEW”

    More on the word “JEW” from a “JEW”

    The word “Jew” was first introduced into the English language in the 18th century, its one and only implication, inference and innuendo was “Judean”.   However during the 18th, 19th and 20th centuries a well-organized and well- financed international “pressure group” created a so-called “secondary meaning” for the word “Jew” among the English- speaking peoples of the world. This so-called “secondary meaning” for the word “Jew” bears no relation whatsoever to the 18th century original connotation of the word “Jew”. It is a misrepresentation”… Benjamin Freedman

    Who is an Israelite?

    In view of Israel’s dispersion, Paul brings up a critical point in Romans 9:6-8,

    6 But it is not as though the word of God has failed. For they are not all Israel who are from Israel; 7 neither are they all children because they are Abraham’s descendants, but “Through Isaac your descendants will be named.” 8 That is, it is not the children of the flesh who are children of God, but the children of the promise are regarded as descendants.

    God’s promises to Israel have not failed, even though Israel was divorced, cast off, and lost. God promised to remarry Israel, and He will. However, He will not marry a carnal people. Just because one is descended from Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob-Israel does not make one an Israelite. “They are not all Israel who are from Israel.” As we have seen already, the name of Israel was taken away from them, and the only way they may regain that title-name is to come into the adoption of sons, the huiothesia, “Son Placement.”

    In other words, only Christian believers among those ex-Israelites of the dispersion are eligible to be called by the name Israel. God stripped that name from them years ago because of their unbelief and idolatry—in effect, for rejecting Jesus, the God of Israel. And so the term Israel is no longer applicable in the same national sense that it was used in the Old Testament. The name will be applied more specifically to those whose character reflects the meaning of the name. The name means “God rules.” It is a name that signifies a person’s testimony to the sovereignty of God. Any natural Israelite who continues to reject Jesus Christ is not an Israelite at all in the sight of God.

    Paul also brings up Hosea’s prophecy to Israel. Romans 9:24-26 says,

    24 Even us, whom He also called, not from among the Jews only, but also from among Gentiles [Greek: ethnos, “the nations”]. 25 As He says also in Hosea, “I will call those who were not My people, ‘My people’, and her who was not beloved, ‘Beloved’. 26 And it shall be that in the place where it was said to them, ‘You are not My people,’ there they shall be called sons of the living God.”

    In that Hosea’s prophecies were directed toward Israel, and not Judah, it is plain that Paul was not speaking of the Jews. The only way one can apply this to the Jews is if we first assume that Judah and Israel were the same nation and then extend this to mean that the Jews are Israel. But as we have already shown, this is not historically accurate.

    “……….., The only true Israelites are the overcomers. These are the ones who will be entrusted to rule in His Kingdom during the thousand-year Messianic Age. These are not a people of privilege who can sin with immunity. These are people who—like Jacob himself—have been disciplined and trained to have the character of Jesus Christ. They will then teach others by example how to become true Israelites.

    Verse 7 concludes,

    7 What then? That which Israel is seeking for, it has not obtained, but those who were chosen [exloge, “the elected ones,”] obtained it, and the rest were hardened.

    Paul then goes on to show that Israel’s fall was for the benefit of the world. Even those idolatrous Israelites, who died apart from Christ, will ultimately come into the knowledge of Jesus Christ. They will not inherit the first resurrection that is reserved for the overcoming remnant. Nevertheless, they will be part of “the reconciliation of the world” (Rom. 11:15). God locked them up in disobedience so that He might have mercy upon all (Rom. 11:32). But that is a subject covered in other books and is too lengthy for this study of Who is an Israelite?.

    The kingdom of God shall be taken from you, and given to a nation bringing forth the fruits thereof ” [Matthew 21:43]

    Judah married a Canaanite. Genesis 38:1-2.

    No blemished Judah blood [Judah/Canaanite] was allowed in the line chosen to antecede Jesus Christ.

    Judah also began a pure blood line through Tamar. Genesis 38:13-30

    Jesus Christ is the end of the pure blood Chosen line — Judah/Tamar, Pharez, Naason, David — Ruth, Mary that was chosen to antecede Him. Christ has not fathered physical descendents, therefore there is no pure blood – physical line of Judah that can be said to have descended from Christ. Those who hate Christianity and call themselves Gods Chosen People in the flesh are liars – those of all nations who call on the name of Christ are of Judah in Spirit and therefore Semites. Jesus Christ – the King of Judah. Gen. 38 11-30, Ruth 4 18-22

    By Mike Green
    We can only begin to understand the society that existed in the land of Canaan in the Lord Jesus’s day if we understand what took place there during the several hundred years leading up to His arrival. The following is a very brief summary of the history of Canaan circa. 700-100 B.C.
    When the House of Israel and some 200,000 of the House of Judah were taken captive to Assyria (beginning circa. 724 B.C.), the Assyrians brought all manner of foreign tribes in to occupy the land of Samaria:
    ‘‘And the king of Assyria brought men from Babylon, and from Cuthah, and from Ava, and from Hamath, and from Sepharvaim, and placed them in the cities of Samaria instead of the children of Israel: and they possessed Samaria, and dwelt in the cities thereof. “ (II Kings 17:24)
    This was to prevent the House of Israel from returning to Samaria, and they never did. These foreign tribes intermarried with most of what few members of the House of Israel were left in the land (the berries on the uppermost branches etc, Isaiah 17:6) and became known as the Samaritans.
    Following the removal of the remainder of the House of Judah by the Babylonians (beginning circa. 586 B.C.), the Edomites, who had actually assisted the Babylonians in capturing the Judahites, moved in to occupy the land of Judah, later known as Judaea, as did many other Canaanite tribes:
    “After this {the Babylonian deportation of the remnant of the House of Judah} they {the Edomites} settled in southern Palestine {Judaea }, and for more than four centuries continued to prosper.” (Smith’s Bible Dictionary, under ” Edom or Idumaea”)
    “The Edomites pressed into the now empty lands in the South of Judah [ Judaea ] “ (International Standard Bible Encyclopaedia, under ” Edom ; Edomites”)
    The Return from Exile
    Ezra tells us that only a tiny remnant of the House of Judah [Jerusalem], less than 43,000, returned to Canaan following their 70 years in captivity in Babylon . That is less than one per cent of the total number of Israelites taken away captive (some six to nine million based on the number of fighting men). They were members of the tribes of Judah, Benjamin and Levi.
    When this tiny band of Judahites arrived in Judaea they found it to be a very different place to that which they had left 70 years before. Ezra tells us that the returning Judahites were initially living in fear because of all the foreign peoples that were now living in Judaea, and even lists them for us (note that Esau, the twin brother of Jacob-Israel, had joined himself through marriage to the Canaanites and Hittites, among others):
    ”And when the seventh month was come, and the children of Israel were in the cities, the people gathered themselves together as one man to Jerusalem …And they set the altar upon his bases; for fear was upon them because of the people of those countries.” (Ezra 3: 1 ,3, KJV)
    “Now when these things were done, the princes came to me, saying, The people of Israel, and the priests, and the Levites, have not separated themselves from the people of the lands, doing according to their abominations, even of the Canaanites, the Hittites, the Perizzites, the Jebusites, the Ammonites, the Moabites, the Egyptians, and the Amorites. ” (Ezra 9:1, KJV)
    There was so little room in Judaea that most of the Benjaminites among the returning Judahites had to leap-frog Samaria, which was also full of foreign tribes, and settle in the land of Galilee which was largely unoccupied at that time.
    The Conversion
    In 126 B.C. John Hyrcanus II, the last true Judahite heir to the throne of Judah in Canaan, defeated the Edomites militarily. Hyrcanus ordered that all Edomites in Judaea and Idumaea (Edom) circumcise themselves and convert to Hebrewism, the Israelite religion. The Edomites complied, and from that time on they became part of the nation of Judah :”… during the warlike rule of the Maccabees they {the Edomites} were again completely subdued, and even forced to conform to Jewish laws and rites, and submit to the government of Jewish prefects. The Edomites were now incorporated with the Jewish nation. ” (Smith’s Bible Dictionary, under “Edom, ldumaea or Idumea”)
    “Hyrcanus took also Dora and Marissa, cities of ldumea, and subdued all the ldumeans; and permitted them to stay in that country, if they would circumcise their genitals, and make use of the laws of the Jews… they were hereafter no other than Jews. ” (Judahite historian Flavius Josephus:Antiquities of the Jews, Book XIII, Chapter IX, sec. I )
    Although known from this time on as “Judah” by name, these Edomite converts remained very much Edomites by race.
    The Usurping
    The forced conversion of the Edomites was a disastrous decision for the House of Judah. The Edomite governor, Antipater the Idumaean, became procurator of Judaea, Galilee and Samaria.
    Through collusion with the Romans he arranged for his Edomite son, Herod the Great, to usurp the throne of Judah. Herod assassinated John Hyrcanus II , killed all of the Levitical priests bar one, rebuilt the Temple according to his own ( not God’s) requirements and specifications and appointed his Edomite brethren into the Sanhedrin and the newly instigated sects known as the Pharisees and Sadducees:
    “In 126 B.C the country was subdued by John Hyrcanus, who compelled the people to become Jews and to submit to circumcision. Antipater, governor of ldumaea, was made procurator of Judcea, Samaria and Galilee by Julius Caesar. He paved the way to the throne for his son Herod the Great. With the fall of Judah under the Romans [ 70 A .D . ] , ldumaea disappears from history.”(International Standard Bible Encyclopaedia, under “Edom; Edomites”)
    “For there are three philosophical sects among the Jews. The followers of the first of which are the Pharisees; of the second, the Sadducees; and the third sect… are called Essenes. These last are Jews [properly “of Judah”] by birth, and seem to have a greater affection for one another than the other sects have.” (Flavius Josephus, The War Of The Jews, Book II, Chapter VIII, Sec. 2)
    [ Note: Not all of the Pharisees were Edomites. For example, the apostle Paul was a Pharisee, although he was an Israelite of the tribe of Benjamin. Nicodemus is another possible exception.]
    The Supplanting of Hebrewism
    The Edomite Pharisees, now in control of the Temple, began teaching a new, Babylonian based religion known as Pharisaism which replaced Hebrewism, the true Israelite religion of the Old Testament Israelites as instituted by God and administered by the Levitical priesthood in accordance with His will:
    “With the destruction of the Temple (A.D. 70) the Sadducees disappeared altogether, leaving the regulation of all Jewish affairs in the hands of the Pharisees. Henceforth, Jewish life was regulated by the Pharisees; the whole history of Judaism was reconstructed from the Pharisaic point of view, and a new aspect was given to the Sanhedrin of the past. A new chain of tradition supplanted the older priestly tradition.
    Pharisaism shaped the character of Judaism and the life and thought of the Jew for all the future. ” (The Jewish Encyclopaedia, 1905, under “Pharisees”)
    This new religion of Pharisaism was later written down in the Babylonian Talmud and became known as Judaism long after the New Testament was written (there was no such thing as Judaism in Biblical times).
    The Result
    By the time Jesus Christ appeared on the scene, the Edomite usurpers had control of the land, the throne, the Temple and the religion of Judah. This was in confirmation of the prophesy spoken by Isaac, Esau’s father, before He died. Esau was mourning the loss of the birthright promises and blessings that had been his, but which he had sold to his younger brother Jacob for a bowl of lentils. In comforting his favourite son, Isaac said:
    ”And by thy sword shalt thou live, and shalt serve thy brother [Jacob-Israel]; and it shall come to pass when thou shalt have the dominion [the Kingdom], that thou shalt break his yoke from off thy neck .” (Genesis 27:40)

    The Jews are of Esau from Idumea, and therefore not of Israel or Judah; Jewish Encyclopedia, 1925, vol. 5, page 41.

    The fact that Esau-Edom had indeed usurped the Kingdom is confirmed by the words of the Lord Jesus Christ when He said to the Jews:
    “Therefore say I unto you, The kingdom of God shall be taken from you, and given to a nation bringing forth the fruits thereof. “ (Matthew 21:43, KJV)
    That “nation” (not “the church” as the preachers falsely claim) was none other than the rightful heirs to the Kingdom, the nation of Israel who at that time were already settling the great wilderness of Europe and Scandinavia, the “many nations” promised to their forefather Abraham.

    Revelation 3:9

    9 Indeed I will make those of the synagogue of Satan, who say they are Jews and are not, but lie—indeed I will make them come and worship before your feet, and to know that I have loved you.

    S.C. 988 BLASPHEMY;
    1) slander, detraction, speech injurious, to anothers good name
    2) impious and reproachful speech injurious to divine majesty

    Revelation 2:9-10 “I know thy works, and tribulation, and poverty, (but thou art rich) and I know the blasphemy of them which say they are Jews, and are not, but are the synagogue of Satan. Fear none of those things which thou shalt suffer: behold, the devil shall cast some of you into prison, that ye may be tried; and ye shall have tribulation ten days: be thou faithful unto death, and I will give thee a crown of life”.
    (In verse 10 is that talking about the “NOAHIDE LAWS“?)

    Fake Jews

    The so called Jews hate Christianity yet use the Bible to make their false claims –

    The Jews are of Esau from Idumea, and therefore not of Israel or Judah; Jewish Encyclopedia, 1925, vol. 5, page 41.

    “Esau/Edom thereupon takes a daughter of Ishmael to wife” (Gen. xxviii. 9).

    Ishmael who took an Egyptian for a wife is the patriarch of the Arab nations (Genesis 21:21)

    “Strictly speaking, it is incorrect to call an ancient Israelite a Jew or to call a contemporary Jew an Israelite or Hebrew.” Jewish Almanac 1980.

    The people who call themselves Jews are Hamites – NOT Semites.

    Judah married and had sons to the daughter of foreign gods——a Canaanite woman. Malachi, chapter 3 & 2:11., Genesis 38:1-10 who later intermarried with the children of Esau/Edom. Herod was an Edomite.

    A Jewish Mother decides legal status

    It’s not a point of view it is the Jews law –

    “………..There are situations in Jewish law where, even in the course of a sexual relationship, no paternity is established. According to Jewish law, the child of a relationship between a Jew and a Gentile always assumes the legal status of its mother. The child bears no legal relationship to its father. See Babylonian Talmud, Yevamot 22a-b; Jacob ben Asher, Tur, Even Haezer ch. 16. This is equally true in cases of artificial insemination…………”

    To be an Orthodox Jew is to agree with the Talmud that, “It is permitted to deceive a goy.” (Baba Kama 113b)

    The unedited full-text of the 1906 Jewish Encyclopedia
    —Biblical Data:
    Jacob’s elder brother (Gen. xxv. 25-34, and elsewhere; comp. Josh. xxiv. 4). The name alternates with “Edom,” though only rarely applied to the inhabitants of the Edomitic region (Jer. xlix. 8-10; Obad. 6; Mal. i. 2 et seq.). The “sons of Esau” are mentioned as living in Seir (Deut. ii. 4, 5). The “mountain of Esau” (Obad. 8, 9, 19, 21) and the “house of Esau” (Obad. 18) are favourite expressions of Obadiah, while by others as a rule “Edom” is employed to denote the country or the people. In Genesis (xxv. 25, 30) “Edom” (red) is introduced to explain the etymology of the name. The real meaning of “Esau” is unknown, the usual explanation “densely haired” (= “wooded”) being very improbable. “Usöos,” in Philo of Byblos (Eusebius, “Præparatio Evangelica,” i. 10, 7), has been identified with it, while Cheyne (Stade’s “Zeitschrift,” xvii. 189) associates it with “Usu” (Palai-Tyros).

    Even before birth Esau and Jacob strove one against the other (Gen. xxv. 22), which led to the prediction that the “elder shall serve the younger” (ib. 23). The first, coming forth “red, all over like an hairy garment,” was called “Esau.” He grew up to be a “cunning hunter, a man of the field” (ib. 27). One day coming home from the field, Esau, hungry unto death, sells his birthright to Jacob for a mess of porridge, which event is turned to account to explain his name (ib. 30 et seq.). When forty years old Esau married Judith and Bashemath, the daughters of the Hittites Beeri and Elon (Gen. xxvi. 34, 35). The favourite of Isaac, he is called to receive the father’s last blessing, but Rebekah treacherously substitutes Jacob for him (Gen. xxvii. 1-24). Discovering the fraud, Esau by much weeping induces the father to bless him also (Gen. xxvii. 38-40). Hating his brother Jacob, he vows to slay him as soon as the father shall have passed away. At his mother’s advice Jacob takes refuge with Laban, his departure being explained to the father as an endeavor to prevent a repetition of marital alliance with the daughters of Heth, so great a source of grief in Esau’s case (Gen. xxvii. 41-46). Esau thereupon takes a daughter of Ishmael to wife (Gen. xxviii. 9). After the return of Jacob the brothers make peace, but separate again, Esau passing on to Seir (Gen. xxxiii. 1-16, xxxvi. 6-8). No mention is made of his death.
    E. G. H.His Vicious Character. …………”

    Jews declare themselves to be anti-White
    Don’t Deny Jewish History and Culture by Calling Us “White”
    Micha Danzig — Forward (New York)
    … Anyone that understands Jewish history as well as the history of the entire development of the idea or construct of the “white race” should understand how that no Jew, Ashkenazi or otherwise, is “white.” While it is certainly the case that many Ashkenazi Jews today in America (such as Ruiz-Grossman) identify as “white,” that doesn’t make it any more accurate or appropriate … This is not merely a semantic issue. Jews are not “white.” We are a tribal people from the Levant … No one that wants to end anti-Semitism and to fight against bigotry and racism should be claiming that Jews are “white.”

    Click to access ECAJ-Antisemitism-Report-2016d-WEB.pdf


    Nov 11, 2014

    Jesus made it clear along the way to Jerusalem that the Kingdom was not coming any time soon. His opposition made it necessary for Him to appeal His case to the divine court of heaven in order to settle the conflict. He knew that He had been sent by God. He knew that He was the One chosen to rule. He knew He was the Heir of all things. But He also knew that when His authority was challenged, the verdict had to come from heaven. For this reason, He saw Himself as the “nobleman” who had to go to the “distant country to receive a kingdom for himself.”

    The parable in Luke 19:12-27 was grounded in the knowledge that He would have to appeal His case to the courts of heaven. It was clear, then, that His arrival at Jerusalem would not be the start of His reign on earth, but of a conflict over throne rights. Even so, He had to present Himself to Jerusalem and the temple in order to allow the nation to make its choice. The disagreement had to surface fully before Christ could go to heaven to “receive the Kingdom.”

    There is a clear distinction between having the lawful right to the throne and actually taking the throne. He had the lawful right to the throne in his first appearance, but only in His second coming does He actually take the throne. In the interim, He has given each of us (His servants) a measure of His possessions (pictured as minas), in order that we might prove ourselves worthy of ruling “cities” under Him.

    The Pentecostal Age is the time in which Christ tests our worthiness to rule. In other words, the main focus is not simply to become a believer (servant, slave) but to become an overcomer that qualifies for the first resurrection. These “will be priests of God and of Christ and will reign with Him for a thousand years” (Revelation 20:6). Their reign cannot begin until their “Nobleman” returns.

    Did Christ Return at Pentecost?

    There are some who teach that Christ returned on the Day of Pentecost, and that we are now to reign with Christ. By this view, the divine court only took ten days to hear the case, sort out the conflicts, and render its verdict. Jesus ascended on the fortieth day from His resurrection (Acts 1:3), the traditional date of Elijah’s ascension, and then sent the Holy Spirit to the Church on Pentecost (the fiftieth day).

    However, the parable of the nobleman is better interpreted to mean that the Church was gifted with minas (spiritual gifts), and that they were expected to be productive during the Pentecostal Age while Christ was absent, appealing His case to the divine court. It is not reasonable that the servants of the nobleman were given just ten days to “do business.”

    This view also fails to account for the time that the beast empires held the dominion mandate. The beast empires had been contracted to rule the earth for “seven times,” that is, 2,520 years. When Jesus arrived in Jerusalem, only 639 years had passed (since 607 B.C.). There yet remained a long time ahead where Rome still ruled, and after Rome the “little horn” was yet to arise. God always honors His contracts, even with evil empires. So Jesus’ arrival in Jerusalem could not result in His acceptance as King. It was too soon.

    God’s Will and Plan

    Here is an example of how God’s will and God’s plan synchronize. It was God’s will that the people accept Him as Messiah-King, but it was God’s plan that His rule be delayed until the contract with the beast empires had expired. This pattern was the same under Moses, when Israel was supposed to enter the Promised Land at the 50th Jubilee from Adam (Numbers 14). They refused to enter after ten of the spies gave an evil report.

    Though it was God’s will that they enter, it was not God’s plan on account of Noah’s curse upon Canaan in Genesis 9:25-27. Noah put Canaan on Cursed Time, which is based on 414-year cycles. In this case Canaan received two periods of 414 years in which to repent and submit to God. Their time had not yet expired when the twelve spies gave their report. The time expired 38 years later when Joshua finally led Israel into the Promised Land. Only then could God’s will be done without violating the divine plan.

    So we see a close parallel between the first Yeshua and the last. During the interim, Israel was “the church in the wilderness” (Acts 7:38). The time was supposed to be spent learning to be led by the Spirit. Those forty years set the pattern for the forty-Jubilee Age of Pentecost that the New Testament Church spent in its own “wilderness.” Even as the Kingdom could not be given to the Israel Church until their second opportunity, so also the Kingdom could not be given to the New Testament Church until the second coming of Christ (Yeshua).

    Three Controversies

    Many do not understand the distinct purposes of the two comings of Christ, nor why it was necessary. We have already seen by the parable of the nobleman the legal necessity for the two comings insofar as the Jews are concerned. In the broader view that is seen in Paul’s writings, it is the controversy between the two Jerusalems, each competing to be the “mother” of the Kingdom and the seat of government. In Galatians 4:25, 26 we are told that the earthly Jerusalem is “Hagar,” which “is in slavery with her children.” Paul gives us a preview of the court settlement (taken from Genesis 21:10), as he says in Galatians 4:30,

    30 But what does the Scripture say? “Cast out the bondwoman and her son, for the son of the bondwoman shall not be an heir with the son of the free woman.”

    Paul says that the New Jerusalem will win this legal case, for it is “Sarah,” allegorically speaking.

    The second controversy is between Saul and David. Because Saul was crowned on Pentecost (the day of wheat harvest, 1 Samuel 12:17), he became a type of the Church during the Pentecostal Age. He reigned forty years, the same amount of time of the church in the wilderness. Hence, he represents the Pentecostal Kingdom which would have to give way to the permanent Kingdom of David.

    This established the prophetic type of the forty-Jubilee Age of Pentecost (from 33-1993 A.D.). That controversy was resolved according to the biblical patterns which I have written about for many years. Pentecost must give way to Tabernacles in order to provide a greater anointing necessary to finish the work in the Age to come.

    The third controversy is really two controversies bundled together in a single case. Overall, it is the controversy between Jacob and Esau over the birthright. Because Jacob deceived his blind father and even lied outright to obtain the blessing, Esau had legal cause against Jacob in the divine court. Hence, Isaac blessed Esau, saying, “when thou shalt have the dominion, that thou shalt break his [Jacob’s] yoke from off thy neck” (Genesis 27:40, KJV). In other words, Jacob would have to give up the “dominion” at some point in order for Esau to prove himself unworthy. Only then could the birthright be taken from Esau according to the law of the hated son (Deuteronomy 21:15-17).

    This controversy is one of the major themes of Scripture throughout history. It appears again in Ezekiel 35, 36, where we find that the descendants of Esau-Edom (or Idumea) coveted the land and rejoiced when Israel and Judah went into captivity. Divine judgment is thus pronounced “against all Edom, who appropriated My land for themselves as a possession” (Ezekiel 36:5).

    Isaiah 34:8, KJV, calls it “the controversy of Zion,” speaking of divine judgment against Edom. Historically, about 126 B.C. the Judean leader, John Hyrcanus, conquered Idumea (Edom) and forced them to convert to Judaism. Josephus wrote about this and concluded by saying, “they were hereafter no other than Jews” (Antiquities of the Jews, XIII, ix, 1). The Jewish Encyclopedia says “from this time the Idumeans ceased to be a separate people,” for they were absorbed into Jewry. This meant that the prophecies of Judah and Edom were bound together.

    Malachi 1:1-4 prophesies of this controversy, showing the Zionist motives of Esau. Verse 4 says,

    4 Though Edom says, “We have been beaten down, but we will return and build up the ruins”; thus says the Lord of hosts, “They may build, but I will tear down; and men will call them the wicked territory, and the people toward whom the Lord is indignant forever.”

    This is a prophecy of modern Zionism in the past century. The spirit of Edom has worked within world Jewry, saying, “we will return.” God does not refute this, but says only that “I will tear down.” If Edom had not returned and rebuilt the ruins, God would have nothing to tear down, so the establishment of the Israeli state was inevitable.

    The establishment of the Israeli state was the fulfillment of Isaac’s blessing upon Esau, for at that time Esau received the dominion and took the birthright name Israel for itself.

    The second half of this controversy involves the remnant of Judah to whom the Edomites were united forcibly in 126 B.C. This turned out to be the “evil fig” (Jeremiah 24) company which remained in rebellion against God. They rejected Christ and usurped His throne, as we have already shown. Jesus then cursed the fig tree (representing the nation), but later prophesied that this fig tree would again come to life and bring forth leaves (Matthew 24:32). Leaves, of course, were the very reason why the fig tree had been cursed earlier (Matthew 21:19). Jesus came looking for fruit, but only found leaves—a show of righteousness.

    The evil figs of Judah later found common cause with the Jewish Edomites. The Zionist prophecies of Edom matched the prophecy of the cursed fig tree coming to life and producing more leaves. Together, the result was Zionism and the state of Israel (so-called).

    From a genealogical standpoint, neither the Jews nor the Edomites were Israelites, as defined by the prophets. Most of the prophets wrote of Israel after the kingdom had been divided, and so they wrote about Israel and Judah as two separate entities. In my view, the regathering of the lost House of Israel has been fulfilled in a different way and through different people, as I explained in my book, Who is an Israelite?

    The point is that in the past century “the controversy of Zion” has been appealed to the courts of heaven. Who is Israel? Which group is the inheritor of the birthright? I believe that this controversy will be settled at the time of the second coming, when Christ comes as the Heir of Joseph, to whom the birthright was entrusted. A complete study of the controversy between Jacob and Esau can be read in my book, The Struggle for the Birthright.

    Christ’s first coming raised the dispute over the throne rights that were given to Judah in Genesis 49:10 and later to David in 2 Samuel 7:16. When this right was disputed, the controversy was referred to the divine court. But God waited until the second half of the dispute should arise—the controversy over the birthright of Joseph. This controversy is now approaching 70 years (since 1947-48), when perhaps God may resolve this.

    When Jesus came the first time, He came from the tribe of Judah. But Joshua was an Ephraimite, a descendant of Joseph (Numbers 13:8), and when he died, he was buried “in the hill country of Ephraim” (Joshua 24:33). Jesus could claim throne rights through Judah, but He could not lead us into the Kingdom except as an Ephraimite, because the birthright itself was given to Joseph (1 Chronicles 5:1, 2). He must come the second time, then, as the Heir of Joseph. It is for this reason Revelation 19:13 says,

    13 And He is clothed with a robe dipped in blood; and His name is called The Word of God.

    Joseph is the only man in Scripture whose robe was dipped in blood, for Genesis 37:31 says,

    31 So they took Joseph’s tunic, and slaughtered a male goat, and dipped the tunic in the blood.

    And so the Church had to remain in the wilderness during the Pentecostal Age, awaiting the time of the end of beast rule and the start of the Tabernacles Age. We are now at that time. God’s contract with the beast empires expired October 16, 2014 on the eighth day of Tabernacles.

    We are now transitioning into the Age to come, and at the appropriate time, Christ will return to give authority to the overcomers.



    PROTOCOL No. 3

    “1. To-day I may tell you that our goal is now only a few steps off. There remains a small space to cross and the whole long path we have trodden is ready now to close its cycle of the Symbolic Snake, by which we symbolize our people. When this ring closes, all the States of Europe will be locked in its coil as in a powerful vice.”

    Matthew 23:31-33 Wherefore ye be witnesses unto yourselves, that ye are the children of them which killed the prophets. Fill ye up then the measure of your fathers. Ye serpents, ye generation of vipers, how can ye escape the damnation of the grave?

    Revelation 11:8 “And their dead bodies shall lie in the street of the great city, which spiritually is called Sodom and Egypt, where also our Lord was crucified”.

    I Thessalonians 2:14-15 “For ye, brethren, became followers of the churches of God which in Judaea are in Christ Jesus: for ye also have suffered like things of your own countrymen, even as they have of the Jews: Who both killed the Lord Jesus, and their own prophets, and have persecuted us; and they please not God, and are contrary to all men” (“and are contrary to all men”  Isn’t that the truth!)

    It has only been in recent times, that after the people we today know as Jews, became familiar with Christian literature, they began to name their religion JUDAISM. Rabbi Stephen Wise , one of the main Jewish leaders in the United States a few years ago, stated that when the Jews (Judeans) returned to Jerusalem from Babylon about 536 BC., they brought with them the teachings which became known as the BABYLONIAN TALMUD. “This was the end of Hebrewism, and the beginning of Judaism,” the learned Rabbi stated.

    The Protocols of Zion Magnifies the Babylonian Talmud. In short, they are a declaration War and Genocide on WE the Goyim.

    Hosea 4:6 “My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge: because thou hast rejected knowledge”…

    II Cor. 10:12 “For we dare not make ourselves of the number, or compare ourselves with some that  commend themselves: but they measuring themselves  by themselves, and comparing themselves among  themselves, are not wise.” In other words think for yourself!

    1 Thessalonians 5:21 Prove all things; hold fast that which is good.

    II TIMOTHY 2:15 “Study to shew thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth”.

    SC GREEK 3718 “orthotomeo” to make straight, cut, to DISSECT!

    Ephesians 6:13-14 “Wherefore take unto you the whole armour of God, that ye may be able to withstand in the evil day, and having done all, to stand. STAND therefore, having your loins girt about with TRUTH”… emphasis added.

    2 Timothy 3:16-17 “All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness: That the man of God may be perfect, thoroughly furnished unto all good works.”

    PROVERBS 18;1-2 ”Through desire a man, having separated himself, seeketh and intermeddleth with all wisdom. A fool hath no delight in understanding, but that his heart may discover itself”.

    Proverbs 1:7 “The fear of the Lord is the beginning of knowledge: but fools despise wisdom and instruction”.

    Proverbs 1:20-22 Wisdom crieth without; she uttereth her voice in the streets: She crieth in the chief place of concourse, in the openings of the gates: in the city she uttereth her words, saying, How long, ye simple ones, will ye love simplicity? and the scorners delight in their scorning, and fools hate knowledge?”

    Proverbs 1:22 How long, ye simple ones, will ye love simplicity? and the scorners delight in their scorning, and fools hate knowledge?

    The END of this “AGE” – The New World Order! It is the EDOMITE JEWS who are bringing the N.W.O. about!

    Esdras 6:9 …”For Esau is the end of this age, and Jacob is the beginning of the age that follows”…

    2 Esdras 6:9 Context

    6Then did I consider these things, and they all were made through me alone, and through none other: by me also they shall be ended, and by none other. 7Then answered I and said, What shall be the parting asunder of the times? or when shall be the end of the first, and the beginning of it that followeth? 8And he said unto me, From Abraham unto Isaac, when Jacob and Esau were born of him, Jacob’s hand held first the heel of Esau. 9For Esau is the end of the world, and Jacob is the beginning of it that followeth. 10The hand of man is betwixt the heel and the hand: other question, Esdras, ask thou not. 11I answered then and said, O Lord that bearest rule, if I have found favour in thy sight, 12I beseech thee, shew thy servant the end of thy tokens, whereof thou shewedst me part the last night.

Comments are closed.

<span>%d</span> bloggers like this: