Iraqi Voices Are Screaming from Far Away. Are We Listening?

Posted on July 2, 2015 by 

By David Swanson

Iraqis were attempting the nonviolent overthrow of their dictator prior to his violent overthrow by the United States in 2003. When U.S. troops began to ease up on their liberating and democracy-spreading in 2008, and during the Arab Spring of 2011 and the years that followed, nonviolent Iraqi protest movements grew again, working for change, including the overthrow of their new Green Zone dictator. He would eventually step down, but not before imprisoning, torturing, and murdering activists — with U.S. weapons, of course.

There have been and are Iraqi movements for women’s rights, labor rights, to stop dam construction on the Tigris in Turkey, to throw the last U.S. troop out of the country, to free the government from Iranian influence, and to protect Iraqi oil from foreign corporate control. Central to much of the activism, however, has been a movement against the sectarianism that the U.S. occupation brought. Over here in the United States we don’t hear much about that. How would it fit with the lie we’re told over and over that Shi’a-Sunni fighting has been going on for centuries?

Ali Issa’s new book, Against All Odds: Voices of Popular Struggle in Iraq, collects interviews he’s done of key Iraqi activists, and public statements made by Iraqi activist movements, including a letter to the U.S. Occupy Movement and similar messages of global solidarity. The voices are hard to hear because we haven’t been hearing them all these years, and because they don’t fit with lies we’ve been told or even with overly simplistic truths we’ve been told.

Did you know that, at the time of the Occupy Movement in the United States, there was a larger, more active, nonviolent, inclusive, principled, revolutionary movement holding major demonstrations, protests, permanent sit-ins, and general strikes in Iraq — planning actions on Facebook and by writing times and places on paper currency? Did you know there were sit-ins in front of every U.S. military base demanding that the occupiers leave?

When U.S. troops eventually and temporarily and incompletely departed Iraq, that was due, most Americans imagine, to President Barack Obama’s peaceful ways. Other Americans, aware that Obama had long since broken his withdrawal campaign promise, had done everything possible to extend the occupation, had left behind thousands of State Department troops, and would be back in with the military as soon as possible, give credit to Chelsea Manning for having leaked the video and documents that persuaded Iraq to stick with the Bush-Maliki deadline. Few note the efforts of Iraqis on the ground who made the occupation untenable.

The Iraqi media has been shut down when it has covered protests. Journalists in Iraq have been beaten, arrested, or killed. The U.S. media, of course, behaves itself without much prodding.

When an Iraqi threw his shoes at President Bush the Lesser, American liberals giggled but made clear their opposition to shoe-throwing. Yet the fame the act created allowed the shoe-thrower and his brothers to build popular organizations. And future actions included throwing shoes at a U.S. helicopter that was apparently trying to intimidate a demonstration.

Of course, there’s nothing wrong with opposing throwing shoes in most contexts. Certainly I do. But knowing that the shoe throwing helped to build what we always claim to want, nonviolent resistance to the empire, adds some perspective.

Iraqi activists have regularly been kidnapped/arrested, tortured, warned, threatened, and released. When Thurgham al-Zaidi, brother of shoe-thrower Muntadhar al-Zaidi, was picked up, tortured, and released, his brother Uday al-Zaidi posted on Facebook: “Thurgham has assured me that he is coming out to the protest this Friday along with his little son Haydar to say to Maliki, ‘If you kill the big ones, the little ones are coming after you!’”

Mistreatment of a child? Or proper education, far superior to indoctrination into violence? We shouldn’t rush to judgment. I’d guesstimate there have been perhaps 18 million U.S. Congressional hearings lamenting the failure of Iraqis to “step up” and help out in the killing of Iraqis. Among Iraqi activists there seems to have been a great deal of stepping up for a better purpose.

When a nonviolent movement against Assad in Syria still had hope, the “Youth of the Great Iraqi Revolution” wrote to “the Heroic Syrian Revolution” offering support, encouraging nonviolence, and warning against co-option. One has to set aside years of U.S. neocon propaganda for the violent overthrow of the Syrian government, in order to hear this support for what it was.

The letter also urges a “national” agenda. Some of us see nationalism as a root cause of the wars and sanctions and abuse that created the disaster that now exists in Iraq, Libya, and other liberated lands. But here “national” is apparently being used to mean non-divisive, non-sectarian.

We talk about the nations of Iraq and Syria as having been destroyed, just as we talk about various other peoples and states, back to the nations of the Native Americans, having been destroyed. And we’re not wrong. But it can’t sound right in the ears of living Native Americans. So, for Iraqis, talk of their “nation” also seems to be a way to talk about returning to normalcy or preparing for a future not torn apart by ethnicity and religious sectarianism.

“If not for the occupation,” wrote the president of the Organization of Women’s Freedom in Iraq, in 2011, “the people of Iraq would have ousted Saddam Hussein through the struggles of Tahrir Square. Nevertheless, U.S. troops empower and protect the new Saddamists of the so-called democracy who repress dissent with detainments and torture.”

“With us or against us” idiocy doesn’t work in observing Iraqi activism. Look at these four points in a statement made in June 2014 by Falah Alwan of the Federation of Workers’ Councils and Unionists in Iraq:

“We reject U.S. intervention and protest President Obama’s inappropriate speech in which  he expressed concern over oil and not over people. We also stand firmly against the brazen meddling of Iran.

“We stand against the intervention of Gulf regimes and their funding of armed groups, especially Saudi Arabia and Qatar.

“We reject Nouri al-Maliki’s sectarian and reactionary policies.

“We also reject armed terrorist gangs and militias’ control of Mosul and other cities. We agree with and support the demands of people in these cities against discrimination and sectarianism.”

But, wait, how can you oppose ISIS after you’ve already opposed U.S. intervention? One is the devil and the other the savior. You must choose . . . if, that is, you live thousands of miles away, own a television, and really — let’s be honest — can’t tell your ass from your elbow. The Iraqis in Issa’s book understand the U.S. sanctions, invasion, occupation, and puppet government as having created ISIS. They’ve clearly had as much help from the U.S. government as they can stand. “I’m from the government and I’m hear to help” is supposed to be a terrifying threat, according to fans of Ronald Reagan who resent anyone trying to give them healthcare or an education. Why they think Iraqis and Libyans hear those U.S. words differently they don’t explain — and don’t really have to.

Iraq is a different world, one the U.S. government would have to work to understand if it ever attempted to understand it. The same goes for U.S. activists. In Against All Odds, I read calls for “retaliation” framed as calls for peace and democracy. I read Iraqi protesters wanting to make clear that their protests are not all about oil, but principally about dignity and freedom. It’s funny, but I think some of the U.S. war’s backers claimed the war wasn’t all about oil for the similar reason that it was about global domination, power, “credibility.” Nobody wants to be accused of greed or materialism; everyone wants to be standing on principle, whether that principle is human rights or a sociopathic power grab.

But, as Issa’s book makes clear, the war and the “surge” and its aftermath have been very much about oil. The “benchmark” of a “hydrocarbon law” in Iraq was Bush’s top priority, year after year, and it never passed because of public pressure and because of ethnic divisions. Dividing people, it turns out, may be a better way to kill them off than to steal their oil.

We also read about oil workers taking pride in controlling their own industry, despite its being — you know — an industry that is destroying the earth’s climate. Of course, we may all die from war before the climate gets us, especially if we fail to even begin to understand the death and misery our wars inflict. I read this line in Against All Odds:

“My brother was one of those taken in by the U.S. occupation.”

Yeah, I thought, and my neighbor, and lots of Fox and CNN viewers. Many people fell for the lies.

Then I read the next sentence and began to grasp what “taken in” meant:

“They took him around 2008, and they interrogated him for an entire week, repeating one question over and over: Are you Sunni or Shi’a? . . . And he would say ‘I am Iraqi.’”

I’m also struck by the struggles recounted by advocates for women’s rights. They see a long multi-generational struggle and great suffering ahead. And yet we hear very little from Washington about the need to help them. When it comes to dropping bombs, women’s rights always seems to appear as a great concern. Yet when women are organizing efforts to obtain rights, and to resist the radical removal of their rights by the post-liberation government: nothing but silence.

David Swanson is director of and campaign coordinator for Swanson’s books include War Is A Lie.

Recent Posts

River to Sea Uprooted Palestinian 


The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the Blog!

Russia appears to be trying to play a more active role in Syrian crisis

There has recently been an accelerated diplomatic activity around Syria. Turkey’s purported plan for military action inside the Syrian territory may be one key issue that appears to be on Ankara’s agenda. Russia on the other hand appears to be trying to play a more active role in the Syrian crisis by trying to form a new anti-terrorism alliance. 

Our correspondent in Beirut Ali Rizk has more:

Related Videos

الحقيبة السابعة | د. بيير عازر – د. أسامة دنورة – د. محمد سيد أحمد | رانيا عثمان

بانوراما : خالد العبود ، دانيال عبد الفتاح | العالم

 تركيا والمغامرة العسكرية في سوريا | الاتجاه

River to Sea Uprooted Palestinian
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the Blog!

We take down hundreds of ISIS sites, fight w/o guns – ‘Anonymous’ hacker

Media propaganda has proven key to ISIS’ success. International efforts to stem the jihadists online have had little effect. So independent fighters are attempting to turn the tide themselves. RT spoke exclusively to one hacker from a company waging a campaign against the Islamists.
River to Sea Uprooted Palestinian  
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the Blog!

Iran FM Zarif video message from Vienna

Iranian FM has said in a video message that he is negotiating with the P5+1 group of countries to put an end to an unnecessary crisis. Zarif says the two sides have never been closer to reaching a nuclear deal.

Related Videos

العين الاسرائيلية | العالم 02 07 2015


The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the Blog!

Syrian army kills over 100 terrorists in Aleppo, destroys arms depots outside Damascus

Friday, 03 July 2015 15:34

PROVINCES,(ST)_Syrian army has killed over 100 terrorists in Aleppo and pounded several arms depots belonging to terrorist organizations in Damascus countryside.
A military source declared today that army units killed more than 100 terrorists and destroyed 14 vehicles belonging to them during intensified operations against terrorist organizations in the northeastern countryside of Aleppo.
Further terrorists were eliminated when army units targeted hideouts of al-Nusra Front and the so-called the ‘al-Jabha al-Shameyeh’  in Kafer Hamra towns, about 3km north-west of Aleppo city according to the official news agency  (SANA) .
The agency added that army units killed scores of terrorists in the southeastern countryside of Aleppo and destroyed an arms depot belonging to terrorist organizations in al-Brij area.
Two more arms depots plus a bomb-making factory and 4 vehicles equipped with heavy machineguns belonging to terrorist organizations were destroyed on the outskirts of al-Zabadani city, about 11km far aaway from the Lebanese border.
Last April, army units fully controlled the western mountains of al-Zabadani and tightened grip on al-Nusra Front and the Ahra al-Sham movement terrorists  in al-Zabadani city.
There were also operations against terrorist organizations in the southwestern countryside of Damascus and in the Eastern Ghouta of Damascus as well as in jobar quarter near Damascus.
The operations ended with killing and injuring many terrorists.
Infiltration bids into hill in Sweida
In another development, army units inflicted heavy losses upon terrorist organizations in Quneitra countryside and in Daraa and foiled ISIS terrorists’ infiltration bids into Bothaina hill in the northeastern countryside of Sweida.
The US, Israeli, Saudi, Qatari, French and Turkish intelligence agents run the Amman Military Operations Center (MOC) which gives order to terrorist organizations operating in Daraa and Quneitra countryside.
In the central region, army units pounded several hideouts of al-Nusra Front and ISIS terrorists in the eastern and northern countryside of Homs and in Hama countryside.
More hideouts of al-Nusra front terrorists were pounded in the northern countryside of Latakia.
While in Idlib province, Syrian warplanes bombed the Jaish al-Fateh hideouts in towns of al-Mjas, Abu Duhur and Ihsem.
Basma Qaddour 

Related Videos


ملف الليلة | العميد الياس بركات د محمد عبد الحميد | سما

 استديو الحدث 3 7 2015 مع الخبير الاستراتيجي و العسكري د حسن حسن ~ رانيا الذنون

Related News

River to Sea Uprooted Palestinian  
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the Blog!

’ISIL’ Looting Heritage Sites on ’Industrial Scale’

ISIL destroys famous lion statue outside a museum in Palmyra

Local Editor 

  Irina Bokova, the head of the UN cultural agency of the UN Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization [UNESCO] warned that “ISIL” were looting ancient sites across Iraq and Syria on an industrial scale and selling on treasures to middlemen to raise cash.

’ISIL’ Looting Heritage Sites on ’Industrial Scale’

Some sites in Syria had been ransacked so badly they no longer had any value for historians and archaeologists, and UNESCO was also increasingly worried about Libya, the Director General said. 

Furthermore, UNESCO’s warning came as Syria’s antiquities director said “ISIL” destroyed a famous statue of a lion outside the museum in the city of Palmyra, known as Tadmur in Arabic.

Maamoun Abdelkarim said the statue, known as the Lion of Al-Lat, was apparently destroyed last week.

“It’s the most serious crime they have committed against Palmyra’s heritage,” he said.

“ISIL” Takfiri group occupied Palmyra, a renowned UNESCO World Heritage site. So far, the city’s most famous sites had been left intact, but several nearby shrines had been blown up.

In London, Bokova told the Royal United Services Institute that the destruction of artefacts “has reached unprecedented levels in contemporary history”.

“This deliberate destruction is not only continuing, it is happening on a systematic basis. The looting of archaeological sites and museums, in Iraq particularly, has reached an industrial scale of destruction,” she added.

Such “cultural cleansing” was aimed at destroying humanity’s common roots, Bokova stated, but was also a source of financing for fighters who she said were charging local farmers to excavate sites and smuggling out artefacts which eventually made their way to private collectors around the world.

“”Daesh” [“ISIL”] knows there’s a financial upside of this activity and they are trying to gain from it. We know also that parties in the conflict are selling to certain dealers and to private collectors and to market end buyers,” the head of the UN cultural agency indicated.

Consequently, Bokova added that satellite images helped UNESCO understand what was going on, she said, but in some areas there were just hundreds of holes in the ground from which artefacts were being extracted and it was difficult to understand what was being looted.

Source: News Agencies, Edited by website team

03-07-2015 | 11:40

2 July، 2015
Homs, SANA

Terrorists of the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria (ISIS) destroyed on Thursday statue of “Allat God” in Palmyra, which is considered as one of the important historical statues that date back to the 2nd century A.D.

“ISIS terrorists have destroyed one of the most important unearthed statues in Syria in terms of quality and weight… it was discovered in 1977 and dates back to the 2nd century A.D.,” Ma’moun Abdul-Karim, Director General of Museums and Antiquities told SANA.He added the statue which depicts a lion catching a deer between its feet has been hidden in an iron box in Palmyra’s museum garden to preserve it before ISIS terrorists find it and break it into pieces.
 Abdul-Karim affirmed that social media websites reported that ISIS terrorists also broke 8 statues of Palmyra cemeteries which have been stolen by smugglers and taken into Manbij in Aleppo where the so-called “Sharia court” of the extremist organizations ordered to destroy.Mazen

Related Video

الإرهاب يدمر الآثار ويمحو هوية الأمة الثقافية

Recent Posts

River to Sea Uprooted Palestinian   

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the Blog!

Israel colludes with al-Nusra to keep Golan Heights peace – Palestine’s Foreign Minister

Jul 2, 2015,

The Israeli-Palestinian peace process has all but collapsed, and coupled with an outgoing US President and growing regional instability, the political and diplomatic climate doesn’t seem conducive to a breakthrough. Is it time to draw a line on decades of failed negotiations, and what framework could provide the best chance of success? Oksana is joined by Riyad al-Maliki, the Foreign Affairs Minister of the State of Palestine, to negotiate these issues.

River to Sea Uprooted Palestinian


The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the Blog!

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 6,667 other followers

%d bloggers like this: