The Destruction of Mosul, U.S. Crimes against Humanity in the Name of “Counterterrorism”

The Destruction of Mosul, U.S. Crimes against Humanity in the Name of “Counterterrorism”

By Dirk Adriaensens,

Presented in a panel discussion of a side event at the 36th UN Human Rights Council in Geneva: “the destruction of Mosul”.

After 267 days, the end of the battle of Mosul was announced on July 10th. “Liberation” is a misleading notion, because the hostilities have not stopped, the human suffering has not stopped.

There are still victims in the city every day on both sides.

Many refugees have no home to go back to and are suffering from severe mental health problems, especially the children.

No reason to celebrate

Were inter alia destroyed:

  • 9 of the 10 major hospitals.
  • 76 of the 98 medical centres.
  • 6 big bridges across the Tigris.
  • three-quarters of Mosul’s roads,
  • 400 educational institutions, including schools, universities and education centres.
  • 11,000 residential housing units.
  • 4 electrical power plants and 65 percent of its electrical network
  • 6 water purifying systems and much of the city’s water infrastructure has been booby trapped.
  • The pharmaceutical industrial complex.
  • All grain stores.
  • Two large dairies.
  • 212 oil refineries, petrol and fuel stations.
  • All public buildings
  • All state and private banks.
  • 63 religious centres (churches and mosques), most of them valuable historical sites.
  • 250 workshops, factories and small factories, including agro-industries.
  • 29 hotels
  • More than 40,000 civilian casualties
  • 38 out of 54 residential areas in West Mosul are destroyed. A staff director in the office of the Nineveh governor, said that “while eastern Mosul is half-destroyed, the devastation in the western half is much greater”. A member of a local volunteer group said that the destruction in west Mosul is close to “99 percent.”

And in the rest of Iraq, the humanitarian and security situation remains disastrous.

  • 11 million people are in need of humanitarian assistance, of which 5.1 million children (OCHA, September 2017)
  • More than one million people have been displaced since the military operations to recapture the city of Mosul since October 2016, with about three quarters of West Mosul since April. While 1.95 million people have returned to their residences, 3.2 million people remain internally displaced in Iraq and need humanitarian aid.
  • Since June 2014 there were 138 attacks on schools and 58 attacks on hospitals
  • More than 3 million children attend school irregularly, while 1.2 million children do not go to school at all. How many more lost generations will this war produce?

The extent of civilian casualties, the massive destruction of American bombs, missiles and artillery and the use by the American army of white phosphorus, a weapon that is internationally forbidden for use in populated areas, are all serious US war crimes.

Little international attention for civilian victims

The catastrophic number of civilian deaths in Mosul receives little international attention from politicians and journalists. This is in stark contrast to the global outrage of the bombing of East Aleppo by the Syrian government and the Russian troops at the end of 2016.

It is believed that more than 40,000 civilians have been killed as a result of the massive firepower that was used against them, especially by the federal police, air attacks and ISIS itself.

Neither ISIS nor the international coalition, neither the Iraqi government nor the United Nations, provide accurate information about numbers of victims, while groups such as Airwars largely focus on press reports. Airwars estimates that 5.805 civilians have been killed between 19 February and 19 June 2017. However, as always, press reports only cover a fraction of the actual number of deaths.

Mosul, one of the world’s largest cemeteries

People are trying to understand why the death toll in Mosul is so high. A solid explanation can be read in a shocking report by Amnesty International (AI): “At Any Cost: The Civilian Catastrophe in West Mosul”.

This report does not provide a precise figure of the number of deaths, but it confirms the terrible damage that was caused by continuous artillery and rocket fire for a period of five months in a closed area with civilians who were unable to escape.

Other reports from Mosul state that the Civil Defense Unit has already removed more than 2.000 bodies from the rubble. Most victims are reportedly women and children. It is believed that more than 4.000 bodies are buried under the rubble in West Mosul. According to the US, the Joint Operations Command, approximately 1,400 bodies were already excavated. The head of the civil defense unit, Lt. Kol. Rabia Ibrahim Hassan, told the Washington Post that he had asked the government for more equipment and resources, but that he had not received any response.

During the fighting to recapture Ramadi and Fallujah – the previous military campaigns – most residents fled or evacuated before the fighting. However, many Moslawis (Mosul residents) remained in their homes, making the operation much more complicated. Some stayed because ISIS killed the people who tried to escape, some remained because they refused to leave their homes or relatives, some because they had some kind of work, but many remained because the government asked them to. The army threw leaflets from helicopters asking residents not to flee.

The reason was not only because they feared that the flow of refugees would be unmanageable in a country where already 3.4 million people were displaced by the war. This decision was mainly based on the view of the generals who thought to be able to use the citizens in their favour. If the Iraqi forces were to treat the Moslawis well, people would probably help the troops, give information about ISIS, and it would also give good publicity about “the Salvation efforts of the Iraqi Army.”

Death toll of Iraqi soldiers

Premier Haider al Abadi organized a victory parade in Baghdad on Saturday, July 15, where Iraqi armed forces marched before his eyes in the strictly protected Green Zone of the capital. It is a sign for the state of the country that the parade was not publicly announced due to security issues, that the media only came to know later and that the people of the city were excluded from the ‘festivities’. But there was no real reason for celebration because of the enormous losses suffered by Iraqi forces.

The Counter Terrorism Service (CTS), an American trained unit, the elite armed forces of Iraq, has lost 40 percent of its people in the struggle for Mosul. While the Baghdad government has always refused to disclose its military losses, this figure was reported by the US Department of Defense, which calls for $ 1,269 billion to rebuild the unit over the next three years and train 20,000 staff members.

“The requested funding will be essential for the reconstruction of the CTS combat force that has lost 40 percent in Mosul,” according to the sentence in the budget proposal. “These funds will be used to replace vehicles and equipment through combat loss while staff will be trained and equipped to restore this military unit in the context of ongoing conflicts.”

About the losses in other units, such as the Hashd al-Shaabi or Popular Mobilization Forces and the regular combat troops, little is known. There are indications that the losses of the regular armed forces are greater than those of the CTS. If this may be an indication: Middle East Monitor reported on February 23 that 7,000 Iraqi soldiers and military members had been killed.

What about the losses of the “enemy”?

Contrary to the underestimation of civilian casualties, Iraq and the US continuously keep on increasing the number of casualties among ISIS warriors. On July 16, General Abdul Amir Yarallah of the Ninewa Operation Command announced that more than 25,000 rebels were killed during the Mosul campaign. On July 19th, that number had already risen to 30,000. To emphasize how the Iraqi government increases its numbers: in January, the Iraqi Ministry of Defense declared that there were only 9,400 IS elements in Mosul. General Sean MacFarland, Commander of the US coalition, estimated that in August 2016 only 15,000 to 20,000 IS fighters remained in Iraq and Syria. The Iraqis claim to have killed more ISIS members in Mosul only than there are in the whole Middle East. During a discussion at the Aspen Security Forum on Friday, July 21, General Raymond Thomas, head of the US Special Operations Command, even claimed that the US-led offensive had killed 60,000 to 70,000 ISIS militants. He has probably included the civilian casualties in this figure.

The return

According to the International Organization for Migration (IOM), the nine-month siege forced 1,048,044 people to flee. On 25 September, according to UNHCR, 823.000 Moslawi’s remained displaced by the offensive. On 21 September, Iraqi migration authorities have counted 1,74 million refugees since the launch of operations to retake major ISIS strongholds in October 2016. The Iraqi government plans to repatriate all refugees from Mosul by the end of 2017. But that may well be wishful thinking.

Men, women and children who escaped from the destruction of Mosul are housed in tents camps, often in virtual prisons. Women and children suspected of being family members of IS warriors killed in the siege are redirected to “rehabilitation camps”.

Return is impossible for the majority of these internally displaced war refugees. Many do not have homes to return to because of the artillery and air attacks. Most of the city has no access to water and electricity, food is scarce and schools and hospitals are destroyed.

The Ministry of Migration tries to encourage the displaced persons to return to their homes. Seminars are held in refugee camps to encourage people to return. The UN interviewed displaced after such a presentation. Some said they had nothing to return because their homes were destroyed. They had no money left and felt nothing to return until the services were restored and the economy was re-launched. Another problem that the United Nations noted was that the Migration Department has no programs for people returning. The ministry also does not provide the monthly payments on which displaced persons are entitled.

It is estimated that at least 10 percent of explosives from the US coalition have not exploded, causing thousands of bombs and grenades waiting to explode, on top of the abandoned booby traps left by ISIS. Experts have warned that it may take a decade to clear all explosives in the city.

Peace is possible when corruption ends

There is a high level of corruption among the Iraqi soldiers occupying Mosul. They undermine the security measures to neutralize ISIS in the wake of their defeat. Suspects may proceed through military checkpoints, after payment of $ 1,000 and can bring a vehicle after payment of $ 1,500.

Mosul residents are sceptic of what they can expect from government forces. Corruption by the occupying military takes various forms. Moslawis pay soldiers $ 100 for removing a body from the debris and others pay $ 500 to return to their home, if it’s still habitable. Iraqi military and military units have always been accused of asking money for citizens’ protection, demanding money for truckers bringing goods to the civilian population and thus being a particularly profitable milk cow if they have to go through military checkpoints.

Destruction is nothing new in Iraq, and neither is the mismanagement of rebuilding, This problem was on prominent display in a 2013 report by the Special Inspector General for Iraq Reconstruction, which found that the $60 billion in U.S. funds spent over 10 years in the country produced few tangible results. The report blamed this on poor coordination with Iraqis, misplaced priorities, misplanned projects, contractor wastefulness, corruption, and security problems. Iraq’s government, which spent $138 billion during this period, did not do any better.

Prime Minister al-Maliki shakes hands with U.S. President Barack Obama in Baghdad (Source: Wikimedia Commons)

Former Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki has “lost” 500 billion dollars during his term of office (2006-2014), according to the Iraqi Commission of Integrity (CoI). The CoI is responsible for investigating corruption scandals in Iraq. “Nearly half of government revenues during the eight-year period was  ‘stolen’”, according to the spokesman for the Col, in what he called “the biggest political corruption scandal in history”. Iraq’s oil revenues amounted to $ 800 billion between 2006 and 2014, and the Maliki government also received $ 250 billion from various countries, including the US.

The destruction of the Sunni heartland in Iraq

Mosul (Nineveh) is one of the oldest and largest cities of ancient times. The area around the city was already sedentary in 6,000 BC, and in 3,000 BC it was an important religious center in honor of the Mesopotamian goddess Ishtar. The early city was built on a geological fracture line and suffered enormous damage by earthquakes several times.

In the 8th century BC 120,000 people lived in the walled city of Nineveh.The population of Nineveh amounted to about 300,000 people after the reign of Sanherib (704-681 BC). It was the largest city in the world for more than fifty years (668-612 BC).

The destruction of Mosul is not only the destruction of history, but is part of the widespread destruction of cities with Sunni Arab-majority populations.

Under the umbrella of the war against ISIS, the majority of Sunni cities have been destroyed. Thousands of Sunni civilians have been killed. Before the Mosul “liberation”, Tikrit and other cities and villages had already been destroyed, burnt and looted. A UN team described the destruction of Ramadi as “staggering”, with 80% of the city destroyed. Then came Fallujah. Then Al Qaim…. and the US-led coalition airstrikes are still transforming Sunni areas into rubble.

Many Iraqis believe destruction was the plan all along to definitively silence the Iraqi resistance and rebellious Sunni-majority provinces.

Peace is possible with good governance

Remarkable is MercyCorps’s two-year investigation “Investing in Iraq’s Peace”, published in January 2016. The main finding is that sectarianism is not the main cause of the current unrest.

When the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS) quickly conquered a large part of the Sunni part of Iraq in 2014, experts described this as a natural consequence of the sectarian heritage of the country and a consequence of the Sykes-Picot accords, with the artificially drawn border between Iraq and Syria. But from MercyCorps research between 2013 and 2015, it appears that the main factor for the rise of ISIS is not the sectarian division, but rather an absence of inclusive, responsive and responsible governance.

After the invasion of Iraq, political actors including the USA, actively planted the seeds of sectarian divisions for political gain. Sunni and other minority groups were systematically marginalized, harassed by security forces, accused of terrorism and locked up without evidence or trial. Public services hardly worked. This policy based on division fuelled sectarian ideas and created sympathy for groups like ISIS, claiming to be an alternative to the corrupt Iraqi government.

Haider_al-Abadi, Photo by Foreign and Commonwealth Office - Flickr (CC BY 2.0)

PM Haider al-Abadi, (Photo by Foreign and Commonwealth Office – Flickr (CC BY 2.0))

The news about the resignation of Prime Minister Maliki in August 2014 was considered by the Sunnis as good news, and Sunni support for armed groups such as ISIS dropped from 49% to 26%. Although Prime Minister Maliki’s successor Haider Al-Abadi is also a shiite, Sunnis expected an improvement in public services and their perceptions about government agencies changed. In other words, sectarianism does not appear to be the primary or only cause of instability. Proper administration would greatly reduce support for further sectarian polarization.

But the expectations of better governance have not been met. Little progress has been made in the promised reforms. As a result, public opinion polls show that trust in the central government continues to erode. From July 2015, public frustration caused major violent demonstrations across the country against corruption, poor services and sectarianism. These protests are still continuing.Nevertheless, the non-violent movement threatens to be overshadowed by the growing success of armed groups, including the increasingly powerful Shiite militias. Premier Abadi seems to have little control over these militias and this poses a major threat to the future of Iraq.

The study shows that improving government performance is essential for a just and peaceful Iraq.

Unfortunately, donor investment in Iraqi civil society is deteriorating. In 2011, the US government’s annual spending on one soldier in Iraq was an average of $ 802,000 – or 80 billion dollars a year for a minimum attendance of 10,000 troops. What the US government plans to invest in democracy and civilian programs in 2016 is nothing, compared to military spending: $ 72.5 million. There is no miraculous solution for building stability in Iraq, but good governance is essential for addressing the causes of instability and active civil society is essential for good governance.

Testimonies from the war

The toll of the conflict for individuals and families is unusually hard. For close relatives who were locked in the west side of the city, life has been a living hell since the beginning of the conflict.

Not only were they haunted by ISIS, there have been also many crimes and abuses by Iraqi troops since the operation began in 2014. The government in Baghdad has never held anyone accountable. Premier Al Abadi has often criticized human rights organizations investigating the crimes. The fact is that torture and abuse are institutionalized within the Iraqi armed forces, and in all cases they are tolerated by the judiciary. ISIS brought an extreme brutality to Iraq that shocked the country and the world. Now the armed forces are guilty of the same kind of extreme violence.

A testimony in an article from the online news site Middleeasteye reveals the horror of the war.

An Iraqi soldier, fighting the Islamic state said:

“We killed them all, Daesh, men, women and children. We killed everybody.”

What remains of this part of the ancient city of Mosul, where the Islamic state (IS) fighters made their last stand, is a terrible place. And what is under the rubble is testimony of the dark final days of the struggle for Mosul.

Hundreds of bodies lay half buried under the rubble and litter, which was once a flourishing historic district. The dissolution of the bodies occurs rapidly in the scorching 50 ° C summer heat. Feet are the most striking remains.

The last murder party has left terrible traces, and it seems that someone wants to quickly remove these traces. In the past week, armored bulldozers have driven back and forth over the demolished houses and hundreds of bodies buried under the rubble. But the dead do not go away. Rotting body parts color reddish in the midst of the light gray dust and debris of destroyed buildings.

“There are many citizens among the bodies,” says an Iraqi major. “After the liberation was announced, the order was given to kill everyone and everything that moved.” Speaking on condition of anonymity, the Major said those orders were wrong, but the soldiers had to follow them regardless. “It was not right at all,” he said. “The majority of the Daesh fighters surrendered, and we just killed them.”

The reconstruction

After security is guaranteed, the next major step for Mosul will be reconstruction. Lise Grande of the United Nations claims that the situation in East Mosul is going well. There are schools and businesses open, many residents have returned. Local contractors work hard to restore services, and they use local employees.

West Mosul is a very different story. There are 38 out of 54 residential areas severely damaged. That means that much more has to be done than in the east. The first United Nations forecast was that it would cost $ 470 million to restore electricity, water, sewerage, hospitals, schools and homes in the most affected areas. For the remaining parts of the western half another $ 237 million would be needed. That’s twice the amount originally estimated by the United States, and those figures are likely to continue to rise.The United Nations has a plan to form civilian groups, composed of local leaders, officials, tribes, etc., who will decide which homes and buildings will be rebuilt and which ones. The UN hopes that this will also promote further reconciliation through dialogue in neighborhoods. The provincial government will begin restoring services in the next few weeks in the west. The World Bank is also involved in the process and launching projects to rebuild bridges across the Tigris River. Through the World Bank and foreign donors, Iraq wants to get the largest amount of money to rebuild Mosul. Up to now, approximately $ 300 million has been collected, and two donor conferences will be organized to ask for more. It is unclear whether this will be able to make the city live again.

An Iraqi senior official estimates that the cost of reconstruction of Mosul will be more than $ 50 billion. The regime in Baghdad was mandated in May last year to negotiate a $ 5.4 billion loan with the International Monetary Fund, demanding sharp cuts in social services. The country’s economy declined by 10.3 percent in 2016 due to falling oil prices and the effects of the war.

There is little hope that the reconstruction will start soon. Let’s have a look at Baghdad: There is no improvement in services, nor is there any reconstruction. Journalist Dexter Filkins:

“Baghdad in 2014 looks just like in 2004, despite the fact that the Iraqi government pumps up huge amounts of oil and earns a lot of money: they are the second largest producer in OPEC. We are talking about tens of billions of dollars, over 85 billion dollars a year. There is just not much evidence that the oil money is spent well and I think it’s fair to suspect that a lot of that money is stolen. It’s not a happy story, Baghdad is a wreck. I mean, it looks exactly as during the war. “

The end of ISIS?

The Iraqi government has achieved a major victory by destroying ISIS as a state-structure with an extensive area. But the terrorist movement has shown that it is able to adapt to new realities. How many weapons and heavy equipment of three Iraqi army divisions ISIS captured when Mosul conquered in June 2014 was never communicated. Much of this weaponry was hidden by ISIS in tunnels, gorges and valleys in areas of western Iraq and eastern Syria. If ISIS loses these areas, it will simply recover as an armed organization returning to unconventional warfare.

The real power of ISIS follows mainly from the political circumstances of Iraq after the occupation. The sharp contradictions in Iraq contribute to instability and can create the same conditions that led to the rise of the ISIS. Sunnis were excluded from the political process of the country. So the future of ISIS in Iraq depends on the success of the political process in an ethnically and religiously divided country.

It is unlikely that the Iraqi government will fulfill its promises to the devastated Sunni provinces, and the confidence crisis between the Sunnis and Shiites will only worsen.

Without a political process that can integrate the Sunnis and realize their fair demands, ISIS will come back in many forms and it can even become more violent.

Peace can be achieved with diplomacy, not bombs

Western countries should come up with diplomatic solutions, instead of putting oil on the fire, by always choosing the military option. Unless they do that, no strategy to defeat ISIS or any other extremist group will be effective. Bombs may even prove to be counterproductive: civilian casualties and damage to infrastructure can push communities further into the arms of extremists. Not only ISIS, but also the Iraqi government’s security forces are part of the problem. So it’s a bad idea to side with one butcher to defeat another one.

What has been done up to now to achieve a political solution? Nothing. There is a lot of meaningless talk about diplomatic initiatives, but that has already been the case since 2007. Nothing has happened on the diplomatic front. Only massive arms deliveries, the presence of US advisers in all ministries and an embassy larger than Vatican City with more than 10,000 US intelligence officers and mercenaries or contractors, that has been so far the result of “diplomacy”. On June 19, 2014, American President Barack Obama declared that there is no military solution, and that a political solution is the only way to solve the problems in Iraq. The White House, however, continues to provide the Iraqi government with US troops and weapons.

An estimated 20 percent of the Iraqi national budget of 2016 was spent on defence, including the salaries and arms of the Hashd al-Shaabi militrias. The gross domestic product in Iraq amounted to $ 168,61 billion in 2015. Thus the Iraqi government’s military expenses reached $ 33,72 billion, while Iraq faces a humanitarian disaster. Iraq’s national and foreign debts will most likely to exceed $125 billion before the end of 2017, according to predictions of the IMF. If the deficit keeps on growing, Iraq would be at risk of bankruptcy in 2017, the inability to pay its employees’ salaries and social security services. This situation would seriously hamper the necessary reconstruction of the country.

Military force can be part of fighting extremism, but it is a dangerous method, particularly when the main goal – as it must be – is winning over communities. Only forces that can establish positive local relations should have participated in the assault against ISIS. It was probably better to rule out Shia militias in Sunni-majority areas and Kurdish forces in Arab lands. The Sunni community was able to drive out al Qaeda during the US occupation, but was not so willing to drive out ISIS after 2014, because of the severe repression of the Iraqi government against the Sunni community since the withdrawal of the American troops. Conquering the territory and losing the people – as happened in the aftermath of the US invasion of Iraq -can make everything worse.

Peace can be achieved if sectarianism stops

The responsibility for the next phase is on the shoulders of the Iraqi government. It must try to control Iraqi armed forces and Shiite militias, punish human rights violations and war crimes, such as happened during the liberation of Tikrit, Fallujah and Diyala. It must ensure that the Arab Sunni population is no longer marginalized and their voices and concerns are heard. The government must act quickly to house the millions of homeless people and restore the services.

The prospects however don’t seem optimistic. Tallha Abdulrazaq, an Iraqi expert at the University of Exeter (UK):

“The sectarian Baghdad regime has always shown its true colors. It’s only a matter of time before something happens, maybe even worse than ISIS.”

It doesn’t look like the Iraqi government will change its attitude. All political groups, both among Shiite, Sunni and Kurds, are hopelessly divided.

In addition,

“The Iraqi government is detaining more than 370,000 people,” said a security guard to Asso Shittad Press’s journalist. “The prisoners suffer from many diseases, including skin diseases,” he said, adding that most of them can not walk through swollen feet. If more human rights violations are committed in the sunni region, this will mobilize young Sunnis to join another extremist organization.”

Peace is possible if foreign interference stops

Without a comprehensive political settlement agreed by all parties, any post-ISIS situation will end in new conflicts, which will have catastrophic consequences for the unity of the Iraqi state and the country will continue to sink further into chaos.

The Iraqi government is faced with the huge challenge of convincing all factions to put their own political ambitions aside.The first signs are not very hopeful, with conflicting statements about governance structures by Kurdish, Shia and Sunni leaders. A sustainable political agreement must be reached about a reconstruction and reconciliation plan for stability in the region, provided that it is considered fair. Any sustainable solution about the country’s future must address fundamental issues in order to achieve greater social and economic integration of the different ethnic and religious groups of Iraq.

Iraq has a strong civil society, trade unions and opposition groups, which do have elaborate plans and offer solutions to get rid of the disastrous situation in the country. The government and the Western coalition don’t want to listen to their pleas. This makes it particularly difficult to restore stability. The reason for not consulting the civil society is obvious: the Iraqi people want an end to foreign interference and they want their pre-invasion semi-socialized country back and the control over their own resources. The neoliberal Western imperial establishments won’t allow that and so they keep on fuelling the flames of sectarianism.

The end of Iraqi sovereignty?

After the US withdrawal in 2011, Iraq remained dependent on US military and logistical support and protection.Collaboration with occupation forces has benefitted at least two-thirds of Iraq’s post-2003 political class, while the Iraqi people suffered greatly.

Meanwhile, Iran has strengthened its grip on the Iraqi state. On 26 November 2016, the Iraqi parliament legalized the Hashd al-Shaabi, known as the Popular Mobilization Forces (PMF), predominantly Shiite paramilitary troops, now getting legal status besides and apart from the regular Iraqi army.

Why have Iraqi legislators decided to legalize the PMF? What does this mean for the future of the state and society in Iraq? The PMF originated in response to a fatwa, a religious edict, announced June 13, 2014 by Great Ayatollah Ali Sistani, an Iraq-based Iranian spiritual and highest religious authority of the Shiite community. In response to the threat of ISIS, Sistani then called for a jihad against this terrorist group and in his fatwa he urged the Iraqis to take up the weapons against ISIS.

This was conceived as a green light for dozens of Iran-supported Shiite militias to unite in a huge super-militia, the Hashd al Shaabi. Men like Hadi al-Amiri, Qais al-Khazali and Abu Mahdi al-Muhandis, heads of the three largest and most powerful Iran-supported militias, are now the main commanders of the PMF.

Why does the PMF enjoy so much impunity and lack of accountability? The answer lies in the influence and control of Iran on a large part of the Iraqi state structure, not least the Hashd al Shaabi, now being prepared to become a full Iraqi version of the Iranian Pasdaran, better known as The Islamic Revolutionary Guards (IRG), a parallel and potentially competitive force besides the Iraqi army.

The new law states that the PMF is under the direct authority of the prime minister itself, which means that the Iraqi Defense Minister has no authority or control over them.Leaders like al-Amiri, al-Khaz’ali and al-Muhandis are all directly linked to Iran. They are not only loyal to Iraq, but also to the supreme leader of Iran, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. Three major militias, the Badr Organization, Asaib Ahl al-Haq and Kataib Hezbollah use images of Khamenei on their posters and websites.


Instead of calling the ISIS fighters and their supporters “sad murderous losers”,we must first of all try to understand the complex social, economic and political factors that made ISIS a success story. In addition, Iraqi civilian peace initiatives should actively be supported and published by the media. With a fraction of the astronomical sums spent on the war, valuable projects that transcend the sectarian fault lines, should be promoted.

The problem is also this: We must urgently come to terms with our own devastating role in the Middle East and North Africa crisis (MENA). Military interventions from the West in the MENA region have played a decisive role in the radicalization of Muslims in the West. The West has supported the Iraqi government when they were shooting unarmed Sunni demonstrators, bombing Sunni territories and supported Shiite militias that committed large-scale war crimes. Putting all the emphasis on ISIS also has an important political role: the denial of the Western destructive war campaign, which has destroyed the region, hurt the population and caused a major refugee crisis.

Military engagement can potentially weaken the influence of ISIS by demonstrating that they are not invincible. But their eventual eradication will be the result of political processes that may take decades. In the meantime, preventing the destructive fragmentation of multicultural Western societies should be the priority. This requires a clear rejection of the politics of fear, and using the means for prevention at home instead of bombing the Middle East.

Dirk Adriaensens is a member of the executive committee of the BRussells Tribunal. Between 1992 and 2003 he led several delegations to Iraq to observe the devastating effects of the UN sanctions. He was a member of the International Organising Committee of the World Tribunal on Iraq (2003-2005). He is also co-coordinator of the Global Campaign Against the Assassination of Iraqi Academics. He is co-author of ‘Rendez-Vous in Baghdad’, EPO (1994), ‘Cultural Cleansing in Iraq’, Pluto Press, London (2010), ‘Beyond Educide’, Academia Press, Ghent (2012), Global Research’s Online Interactive I-Book ‘The Iraq War Reader’, Global Research (2012), ‘Het Midden Oosten, The Times They are a-changin‘, EPO (2013) and is a frequent contributor to Global Research, Truthout, Al Araby, The International Journal of Contemporary Iraqi Studies and other media.


Maariv: Assad Victorious, Daesh’s Era Over

04-09-2017 | 12:43Bashar al-Assad is the only ruler who has held up since 2011. This happened thanks to Russia, Iran and Hezbollah, who stood by him, while other countries such as Saudi Arabia, Qatar and Turkey fought him.

Syrian President Bashar al-Assad

Right now, it can be said that al-Assad has emerged victorious from this “conflict” over his power.

There may be minor changes in the near future, but if the experts who follow closely what is happening in Syria, as well as what is happening in Mosul and Tal Afar in Iraq, are correct, it can be said that Daesh was defeated and its era is over.

Meanwhile, Hezbollah and the Syrian army accuse the United States of blocking the arrival of convoys carrying “expelled” militants who were expelled from the Syrian-Lebanese border to Deir ez-Zor under the latest agreement.

This comes as the US-led coalition forces will not allow the continuation of the convoy’s journey towards the border while Jordan will soon reopen its border with Syria, and recently opened its borders with Iraq.

In light of these developments, it can be assumed that “Israel” will not remain silent over the diplomatic-security earthquake hitting the neighboring countries.

Source: Maariv, Translated and Edited by website team

الأسد خرج منتصرًا ,, وعصر داعش انتهى ،، جنون في إعلام العدو

وكالة أوقات الشام الإخبارية

أقرّت صحيفة “معاريف” الإسرائيلية بأنّ الرئيس السوري “بشار الأسد هو الحاكم الوحيد الذي صمد منذ العام 2011. هذا حصل بفضل روسيا وإيران وحزب الله، الذين وقفوا إلى جانبه، في حين أن دولًا أخرى كالسعودية وقطر وتركيا حاربته”.

وقالت الصحيفة “حاليًا، يمكن القول بحق إن الأسد خرج منتصرًا من “هذا الصراع” على سلطته. ربما ستكون هناك تغيرات ثانوية في الفترة القريبة، لكن في حال صدق الخبراء الذين يتابعون عن كثب ما يحصل في سوريا، وكذلك ما يحصل في الموصل وتلعفر في العراق، يمكن القول إن داعش هُزم بشكل نهائي وعصره انتهى”.

وأضافت: “في غضون ذلك، يتّهم حزب الله والجيش السوري الولايات المتحدة بعرقلة وصول القوافل التي تقل عناصر “داعش” الذين تم طردهم من الحدود السورية- اللبنانية الى دير الزور بموجب الاتفاق الأخير، فيما توضح قوات التحالف بقيادة الولايات المتحدة أنها لن تسمح بمواصلة رحلة القافلة بإتجاه الحدود السورية-العراقية، بينما ستعيد الأردن في الفترة القريبة فتح حدودها مع سوريا، كما فتحت حدودها مؤخرًا مع العراق. أمام هذه التطورات، يمكن الاعتقاد بأن “إسرائيل” لن تبقى مكتوفة الأيدي حيال الهزة الأرضية الديبلوماسية- الأمنية التي تشهدها الدول المجاورة

Covering Up the Massacre of Mosul

Covering Up the Massacre of Mosul

Exclusive: When Russia and Syria killed civilians in driving Al Qaeda forces out of Aleppo, U.S. officials and media shouted “war crimes.” But the U.S.-led bombardment of Iraq’s Mosul got a different response, notes Nicolas J S Davies.

By Nicolas J S Davies

Iraqi Kurdish military intelligence reports have estimated that the nine-month-long U.S.-Iraqi siege and bombardment of Mosul to oust Islamic State forces killed 40,000 civilians. This is the most realistic estimate so far of the civilian death toll in Mosul.

U.S. soldiers fire an M109A6 Paladin from a tactical assembly area at Hamam al-Alil to support the start of the Iraqi security forces’ offensive in West Mosul, Iraq, Feb. 19, 2017. (Army photo by Staff Sgt. Jason Hull)

But even this is likely to be an underestimate of the true number of civilians killed. No serious, objective study has been conducted to count the dead in Mosul, and studies in other war zones have invariably found numbers of dead that exceeded previous estimates by as much as 20 to one, as a United Nations-backed Truth Commission did in Guatemala after the end of its civil war. In Iraq, epidemiological studies in 2004 and 2006 revealed a post-invasion death toll that was about 12 times higher than previous estimates.

The bombardment of Mosul included tens of thousands of bombs and missiles dropped by U.S. and “coalition” warplanes, thousands of 220-pound HiMARS rockets fired by U.S. Marines from their “Rocket City” base at Quayara, and tens or hundreds of thousands of 155-mm and 122-mm howitzer shells fired by U.S., French and Iraqi artillery.

This nine-month bombardment left much of Mosul in ruins (as seen here), so the scale of slaughter among the civilian population should not be a surprise to anybody. But the revelation of the Kurdish intelligence reports by former Iraqi Foreign Minister Hoshyar Zebari in an interview with Patrick Cockburn of the U.K.’s Independent newspaper makes it clear that allied intelligence agencies were well aware of the scale of civilian casualties throughout this brutal campaign.

The Kurdish intelligence reports raise serious questions about the U.S. military’s own statements regarding civilian deaths in its bombing of Iraq and Syria since 2014. As recently as April 30, 2017, the U.S. military publicly estimated the total number of civilian deaths caused by all of the 79,992 bombs and missiles it had dropped on Iraq and Syria since 2014 only as “at least 352.” On June 2, it only slightly revised its absurd estimate to “at least 484.”

The “discrepancy” – multiply by almost 100 – in the civilian death toll between the Kurdish military intelligence reports and the U.S. military’s public statements can hardly be a question of interpretation or good-faith disagreement among allies. The numbers confirm that, as independent analysts have suspected, the U.S. military has conducted a deliberate campaign to publicly underestimate the number of civilians it has killed in its bombing campaign in Iraq and Syria.

Propaganda Campaign 

The only rational purpose for such an extensive propaganda campaign by U.S. military authorities is to minimize the public reaction inside the United States and Europe to the killing of tens of thousands of civilians so that U.S. and allied forces can keep bombing and killing without political hindrance or accountability.

Nikki Haley, United States Permanent Representative to the UN, denounces alleged Syrian war crimes before the Security Council on
April 27, 2017 (UN Photo)

It would be naive to believe that the corrupt institutions of government in the United States or the subservient U.S. corporate media will take serious steps to investigate the true number of civilians killed in Mosul. But it is important that global civil society come to terms with the reality of the destruction of Mosul and the slaughter of its people. The U.N. and governments around the world should hold the United States accountable for its actions and take firm action to stop the slaughter of civilians in Raqqa, Tal Afar, Hawija and wherever the U.S-led bombing campaign continues unabated.

The U.S. propaganda campaign to pretend that its aggressive military operations are not killing hundreds of thousands of civilians began well before the assault on Mosul. In fact, while the U.S. military has failed to decisively defeat resistance forces in any of the countries it has attacked or invaded since 2001, its failures on the battlefield have been offset by remarkable success in a domestic propaganda campaign that has left the American public in near-total ignorance of the death and destruction U.S. armed forces have wreaked in at least seven countries (Afghanistan, Pakistan, Iraq, Syria, Yemen, Somalia and Libya).

In 2015, Physicians for Social Responsibility (PSR) co-published a report titled, “Body Count: Casualty Figures After 10 Years of the ‘War On Terror’.” This 97-page report examined publicly available efforts to count the dead in Iraq, Afghanistan and Pakistan, and concluded that about 1.3 million people had been killed in those three countries alone.

I will examine the PSR study in more detail in a moment, but its figure of 1.3 million dead in just three countries stands in striking contrast to what U.S. officials and corporate media have told the American public about the ever-expanding global war being fought in our name.

After examining the various estimates of war deaths in Iraq, the authors of Body Count concluded that the epidemiological study headed by Gilbert Burnham of Johns Hopkins School of Public Health in 2006 was the most thorough and reliable. But just a few months after that study found that about 600,000 Iraqis had probably been killed in the three years since the U.S.-led invasion, an AP-Ipsos poll that asked a thousand Americans to estimate how many Iraqis had been killed yielded a median response of only 9,890.

So, once again, we find a vast discrepancy – multiply by about 60 – between what the public was led to believe and a serious estimate of the numbers of people killed. While the U.S. military has meticulously counted and identified its own casualties in these wars, it has worked hard to keep the U.S. public in the dark about how many people have been killed in the countries it has attacked or invaded.

This enables U.S. political and military leaders to maintain the fiction that we are fighting these wars in other countries for the benefit of their people, as opposed to killing millions of them, bombing their cities to rubble, and plunging country after country into intractable violence and chaos for which our morally bankrupt leaders have no solution, military or otherwise.

(After the Burnham study was released in 2006, the Western mainstream media spent more time and space tearing the study down than was ever spent trying to ascertain a realistic number of Iraqis who had died because of the invasion.)

Misguided Weapons

As the U.S. unleashed its “shock and awe” bombardment of Iraq in 2003, one intrepid AP reporter spoke to Rob Hewson, the editor of Jane’s Air-Launched Weapons, an international arms trade journal, who actually understood what “air-launched weapons” are designed to do. Hewson estimated that 20-25 percent of the latest U.S. “precision” weapons were missing their targets, killing random people and destroying random buildings across Iraq.

At the start of the U.S. invasion of Iraq in 2003, President George W. Bush ordered the U.S. military to conduct a devastating aerial assault on Baghdad, known as “shock and awe.”

The Pentagon eventually divulged that a third of the bombs dropped on Iraq were not “precision weapons” in the first place, so altogether about half of the bombs exploding in Iraq were either just good old-fashioned carpet bombing or “precision” weapons often missing their targets.

As Rob Hewson told the AP, “In a war that’s being fought for the benefit of the Iraqi people, you can’t afford to kill any of them. But you can’t drop bombs and not kill people. There’s a real dichotomy in all of this.”

Fourteen years later, this dichotomy persists throughout U.S. military operations around the world. Behind euphemistic terms like “regime change” and “humanitarian intervention,” the aggressive U.S.-led use of force has destroyed whatever order existed in at least six countries and large parts of several more, leaving them mired in intractable violence and chaos.

In each of these countries, the U.S. military is now fighting irregular forces that operate among civilian populations, making it impossible to target these militants or militiamen without killing large numbers of civilians. But of course, killing civilians only drives more of the survivors to join the fight against Western outsiders, ensuring that this now global asymmetric war keeps spreading and escalating.

Body Count’s estimate of 1.3 million dead, which put the total death toll in Iraq at about 1 million, was based on several epidemiological studies conducted there. But the authors emphasized that no such studies had been conducted in Afghanistan or Pakistan, and so its estimates for those countries were based on fragmentary, less reliable reports compiled by human rights groups, the Afghan and Pakistani governments and the U.N. Assistance Mission to Afghanistan. So Body Count‘s conservative estimate of 300,000 people killed in Afghanistan and Pakistan could well be only a fraction of the real number of people killed in those countries since 2001.

Hundreds of thousands more people have been killed in Syria, Yemen, Somalia, Libya, Palestine, the Philippines, Ukraine, Mali and other countries swept up in this ever-expanding asymmetric war, along with Western victims of terrorist crimes from San Bernardino to Barcelona and Turku. Thus, it is probably no exaggeration to say that the wars the U.S. has waged since 2001 have killed at least two million people, and that the bloodshed is neither contained nor diminishing.

How will we, the American people, in whose name all these wars are being fought, hold both ourselves and our political and military leaders accountable for this mass destruction of mostly innocent human life? And how will we hold our military leaders and corporate media accountable for the insidious propaganda campaign that permits rivers of human blood to keep flowing unreported and unchecked through the shadows of our vaunted but illusory “information society”?

Nicolas J S Davies is the author of Blood On Our Hands: the American Invasion and Destruction of Iraq.  He also wrote the chapters on “Obama at War” in Grading the 44th President: a Report Card on Barack Obama’s First Term as a Progressive Leader.

Censorship On Youtube: SouthFront Channel Is Again Under Attack

August 17, 2017

الحشد الشعبي قوات الفيتكونغ العراقية

الحشد الشعبي قوات الفيتكونغ العراقية

أغسطس 7, 2017

محمد صادق الحسيني

لا خيار أمام العراقيين إلا التوسّل بدرّة التاج العراقي المتمثلة بالحشد الشعبي، بعد أن أصبح حبل النجاة الوحيد المتبقي لصناعة عراق ما بعد القهر والحرمان والتبعية والنفوذ الأجنبي…!

لا شك، ولا ريب، ولا ترديد أنه من المهمّ جداً أن نعطي المرجعية الدينية العليا في العراق بشخص آية الله العظمى السيستاني حقها، ونشير إلى فضلها الممتاز في إطلاق مشروع الحشد الشعبي العراقي في لحظة تاريخية فاصلة من تاريخ العراق لم يكن بالإمكان عبورها، إلا من خلال مثل هذه الفتوى المرجعية الرشيدة…

لكن ما لا يقلّ عنه أهمية أيضاً بتقديري هو التوقف طويلاً عند المخزون الشعبي الهائل من الذاكرة العراقية المتأجّجة تديّناً ووطنيةً وهمّةً، والتي كانت تبحث عن لحظتها أو فرصتها التاريخية لتعبّر عن نفسها بطريقة مختلفة ومتميّزة، فجاءت الفتوى بمثابة الشرارة التي أشعلت حقولاً وليس فقط حقلاً واحداً من الطاقات الكامنة في أجيال من عمر الإنسان العراقي الذي شكّل عملياً البيئة الحاضنة التي لولاها ما كان لأيّ كان ولا لأيّ تعليماتٍ مهما بلغت في قدسيتها أن تحرّك هذا الطوفان الهادر وباتجاه الأهداف العليا المنشودة بهذه السرعة وبهذا الزخم الذي رأيناه يشتعل على أرض الرافدين الطاهرة والمطهّرة كالنار في الهشيم…

لرسم بعض ملامح صورة ما حصل ومستمرّ في الحصول في العراق، يمكننا الاستعانة بقول إحدى أمّهات الشهداء، وهي تخاطب أهل الموصل بعد التحرير مباشرة بالقول:

«ترسناكم.. فرح، والحزن بينا يطوف..!».

أيّ لقد قدّمنا لكم كلّ هذا الفرح الكبير يا أهلنا الموصليين بكلّ فخر واعتزاز، بفعل عملية التحرير والتطهير التي أنجزها أبناء العراق لكم، لكن ذلك ينبغي أن لا يجعل أحداً ينسى أو يتناسى، بأنّ ذلك يحصل وحزام الحزن الكبير والواسع الذي يلفّ حولنا – نحن جمهور الناس – طولاً وعرضاً على امتداد جغرافيا العراق وتاريخه وأعماقه كان حاضراً على امتداد فعل التحرير والتطهير وما بعده…!

إنها خلطة وعجينة عجيبة وفريدة من نوعها قد تلخص ليس سيكولوجية فلسفة «طواف» الحزن العراقي فحسب، بل وربما يمكنها أن تشكل فلسفة القهر العام الذي تعيشه الجماهير العربية والإسلامية على امتداد وطننا الكبير وعلى امتداد قرون التاريخ الطويلة…

وإلا كيف ينام العراق والأمة معه على ضيم، في لحظة غفلة من الزمان، بفعل داعش وأخواته في العام 2014 على خلفية جيش متقهقر ودولة تائهة وعراق حزين، ليستفيق في العام 2017 على حشد يُضاهي أكبر جيوش المنطقة ويصبح واحداً من أعمدة النور التي ستغيّر وجه العالمين العربي والإسلامي إنْ لم يكن العالم، وليس العراق وحده…!؟

إنه ليس مجرد كمّ من البشر حملوا البنادق وتدرّبوا للدفاع عن وطنهم وخاضوا معارك الدفاع المقدّس عن دينهم وعرضهم وأرضهم، وهو ما حصل بالفعل أيضاً، وفي أكثر ميدان والموصل ليس آخرها وتلعفر وما بقي من أرض العراق الطاهر بالانتظار…!

إنه ليس تضافر جهود المخلصين من أبناء العراق لتعبئة الناس باتجاه القيام بالواجب الديني والوطني فحسب…!

إنه ليس فقط انصهار فصائل وكتل وتيارات وأحزاب وقوى وطوائف أو مذاهب من أجل الدفاع عن العراق واستعادة أرضه وقيمه وروحه النقية من الخصم المتوحّش المغمس بأشكال الرذيلة كافة..!

إنه بات حتى بمعنى من المعاني، كما أسلفنا أبعد وأعمق وأكثر تعبيراً وتجسيداً من مجرد تطبيق فتوى دينية خطيرة رغم أهميتها الكبرى ودورها المتميّز…!

إنّها صيرورة فعل وانفعال وجدان شعب بجمهوره ورجاله الممتازين وتراكم وتبلور عقل قيادة دينية ووطنية تاريخية، أثمرت ما بات يُعرَف عنه اليوم الحشد الشعبي العراقي…!

وعليه، فالحشد اليوم ليس جسماً عسكرياً تابعاً للقيادة العسكرية العراقية فحسب… ولا تشكيلاً أو مكوّناً مجتمعياً يضمّ ألوية وسرايا وكتائب وفصائل وتيارات شعبية عراقية فحسب… ولا هو مشروع إعادة صياغة الجسم الوطني العراقي بعد كلّ ما أصابه من كسور ورضوض وأمراض أو وعكات أو تعثر فحسب…!

إنه مشروع إعادة بناء العراق من جديد على أسس ومعايير وفلسفة بناء مشروع دولة مدنية دينية معاصرة أصلها ثابت وفرعها في السماء…!

بل قد يكون حتى أوسع وأبعد مدى من ذلك كله، إنّه يرقى إلى أن يكون مشروع حركة تحرّر وطني للعراق كما يمكن له أن يتحوّل مستقبلاً نموذجاً يُحتذى به من سائر بلدان العالم…!

تماماً كما لعب مثل هذا الدور مشروع حزب الله لبنان وأنصار الله اليمن وكلّ أشكال التعبئة والنهضة الحديثة في أمصارنا العربية والإسلامية، واذا ما تجاوزنا الفكر السياسي المحدود، قد نستطيع القول إنه حتى أهمّ من مشروع الحرس الثوري الإيراني وقوات الفيتكونغ الفيتنامية…!

إنه عين العراق التي بها سيتمّ الحفاظ على وحدته وانسجامه وقوامه الوطني والعقيدي، كما هو عين العراق على الأمة، بما يسير في لحظة مصيرية تاريخية، كما هي الآن حيث تتبلور وحدة الدم ووحدة الساحات لكلّ أشكال رجال الله الأمر الذي بات يشكل الواقع الأقوى الذي يفرض نفسه في ظلّ حراك حثيث دولي باتجاه إعادة صياغة نظام عالمي جديد وفرضه كبديل لمعادلة المنتصرين في الحرب العالمية الثانية…

نظام يفترض أن يكون لنا فيه نحن المسلمين والعرب ومحور المقاومة والعراقيين بشكل خاص، دور متميزّ وأساسيّ في العهود المقبلة..!

وعليه نستطيع القول إنّ فلسفة الحشد الشعبي استطاعت خلال الأشهر القليلة الماضية أن تسير بسرعة فائقة وهائلة نحو السمو والرفعة، ما جعل هذا الكيان الوليد الطري العود يبرز وسط تزاحم الأضداد بمثابة الرقم الصعب الذي سيلعب دوراً مركزياً مهماً ليس فقط في إعادة صناعة عراق مختلف ومتميّز يتجاوز فيه عثرات وعورات ما بعد ثورة العشرين العراقية العظيمة، بل سيرقى قريباً إلى مصاف القوى التي ستلعب دوراً في إعادة صياغة المجتمع الدولي الجديد على المستويين الإقليمي والدولي، مجتمع ما بعد سقوط معادلتي سايكس بيكو ومعادلة عالم ما بعد الدولار الأميركي قولاً واحداً…!

الحشد الشعبي ليس فقط لا يمكن لأحد، أيّ أحد حلّه، بل إنّ من يفكر بحلّه سيرحل مع الأميركيين وغيرهم ممن دخلوا العراق خلسة وتسلّلاً في لحظة غفلة من الزمن..!

العراق بالحشد الشعبي خرج من القمقم ولا يستطيع أحد، أيّ أحد، إعادته إليه من جديد…!

إنه قوات الفيتكونغ العراقية التي ليس فقط ستنجز مهمة إنهاء الدواعش التكفيريين، بل وستطهّر العراق من رجس المحتلين الأميركيين وكلّ أذنابهم المباشرين وغير المباشرين، ومنهم المرجفين في المدينة..!

القدر المتيقن من كلّ ما ذكرناه أعلاه، هو أنّ الحشد بات ركناً أساسياً من أركان مستقبل العراق، ومستقبل العراق لا يمكن لأحد بيعه أو المساومة عليه لا في سوق العرب ولا في بازار العجم، نقطة أول السطر…!

بحول الله وقوّته اليد العليا لنا.

بعدنا طيّبين، قولوا الله…

مقالات مشابهة

Soleimani & Nasralah سليماني ونصرالله

Soleimani & Nasrallah

يوليو 26, 2017

Written by Nasser Kandil,مراحل ما قبل التسليم الأميركي بالتسوية

The declaration of kissing the hand of Al Sayyed Hassan Nasrollah by the General Qasim Soleimani does not resemble the declaration of Al Sayyed Nasrollah of kissing the heads, the hands, and the feet of the resistance fighters in the war of July but only in purifying of the intention and the sanctity of the situation. In both cases there are conscience, knowledge, gratitude, and certainty that the kissing does not mean weakness or submission but rather an ultimate integration through the value represented by the kissing, it is a pray, worship, sanctification of a sacrifice, offering, and a declaration of loyalty. While the difference in the kissing of father of the head, hands, and feet of his new born is a thanking of the divine grant and appreciation of the value of creation and existence, while kissing the head and the hands of the father or the big brother after winning is a thanking of the divine care, diligence and the recognition of the value of presence, and existence. So the first case is an expression of the greatness and the humility of Al Sayyed Hassan Nsrollah and the greatness of what is presented by the resistance fighters, while the second is an expression of the greatness and the humility of the General Soleimani and the greatness of what is represented by Al Sayyed Nasrollah and the prestige of the status which he has.

In politics, Soleimian according to the opponents of Iran and Al Sayyed Nasrollah and the resistance and how he is described by their satellites is the first ruler of the region and its governor, the final word is for him from Syria to Iraq, Lebanon, and Yemen. Everyone works under his command, how much we have heard about his orders to the Syrian President, the head of the Iraqi government, and to the leadership of Hezbollah, and many who are not allies, or friends, or partners but followers of Iran working under his command as Hezbollah, now Soleimani says that I will kiss the hand of Al Sayyed Nasrollah so what will those say?

If they do not consider, they will say that it is a normal thing or a formal compliment or to raise  the morale of an ally that offers sacrifices, we will accept any description offered by them, but at the same time we will ask them to treat the counterpart in their alliance as soleimiani and who represents a counterpart to Nasrollah despite of the difficulty to compare and to equal between the statuses and the positions, so if they considered that Soleimani is as the Iranian actual leaders who does not belong to the President of the Iranian Republic and he attacks him as their satellites say, and who is related only and morally with the Supreme Advisor Al Sayyed Al Khamenaei then we would say that Mohammed Bin Salman equals him in their camp, surely with respect to the differences, and if we said that the head of the government Saad Al-Hariri  in the Saudi project in Lebanon as Mansour Hadi in Yemen equals what they call the status of Al Sayyed Nasrrollah in the Iranian project, so would we hear that Mohammed Bin Salman has asked to kiss the hand of Al-Hariri or Hadi out of courtesy and to raise morals?

Al Sayyed Nasrollah talked with the solemnity of his greatness and status, without exchanging the compliments and greetings with the General Soleimani, or even to thank him for his noble words. The resistance fighters are preoccupied with what they have to do, there are no protocols among them, what Soleimani said was in its context was an obligatory thing in the process of estimating the paths of the war of Mosul, the war on terrorism, and to remind of the position of the resistance and its leader, while what Al Sayyed said has another context, that the Iraqis are the victory-makers because they depended on themselves, so they were supported, they did not wait any of the allies or the friends, or listen to the enemies. This is in order to say to the Lebanese people that the presence of the terrorists in Arsal has become a humiliation after the liberation of Mosul, so how if it is the source of danger, he concluded by announcing that the resistance has resolved its matter, as it is always,  it will be where it should be, so it is normal that Al Sayyed did not talk about that the participation of Iran as the party which has the credit in order not to miss the compass of his issue just to reply to greetings, which if it was much less than the greetings of Mohammed Bin Salman to Al Hariri then the celebrations and the speeches would last for ten days talking about the royal gift.

Translated by Lina Shehadeh,


(Visited 7 times, 7 visits today)

سليماني ونصرالله

يوليو 12, 2017

ناصر قنديل

مراحل ما قبل التسليم الأميركي بالتسوية

– لا يشبه الإعلان عن تقبيل يد السيد نصرالله من الجنرال قاسم سليماني إعلان السيد نصرالله عن تقبيل رؤوس وأيدي وأقدام المقاومين في حرب تموز، إلا بطهر المقصد وقداسة الموقف، ففي الحالتين وجد ووجدان ومعرفة وعرفان، ويقين بأنّ التقبيل لا يطال مادة ولا يعني ضعفاً وخنوعاً، بل هو اندماج حتى الذروة بالقيمة التي يمثلها موضوع التقبيل، فعل صلاة وعبادة وتقديس لتضحية وعطاء وإعلان ولاء ووفاء، أما الفارق فهو فارق تقبيل الأب لرأس ويدَي وأقدام مولوده شكراً للهبة الإلهية، وتقديراً لقيمة الخلق والوجود. وفي المقابل تقبيل رأس ويد الوالد والأخ الأكبر بعد الفوز شكراً للعناية الإلهية وللرعاية والعناية وتقديراً لقيمة الحضور والوجود. وكما كانت الحالة الأولى تعبيراً عن عظمة تواضع السيد نصرالله وعظيم ما يبذله ويمثله المقاومون، جاءت الثانية تعبيراً عن عظمة وتواضع الجنرال سليماني وعظيم ما يمثّله السيد نصرالله ومهابة المكانة التي يختزنها.

– في السياسة الكثير مما تعنيه كلمات سليماني، فهو وفقاً لخصوم إيران والسيد نصرالله والمقاومة وما تصفه به فضائياتهم، حاكم المنطقة الأول وواليها، وهو الآمر الناهي من سورية إلى العراق ولبنان واليمن، والكلّ يعمل تحت إمرته، وكم سمعنا كلاماً عن أوامر سليماني للرئيس السوري ولرئيس الحكومة العراقية ولقيادة حزب الله، وأن لا حلفاء ولا أصدقاء ولا شركاء بل تابعون لإيران يعملون تحت إمرة سليماني، والمثال حزب الله، وها هو سليماني يقول أقبّل يد السيد نصرالله، فماذا عسى هؤلاء يقولون؟

– إن لم يعتذروا ويعتبروا فسيقولون إنه أمر عادي، أو مجاملة شكلية أو رفع معنويات لحليف يقدّم التضحيات، وسنقبل منهم أيّ وصف يقدّمونه، لكننا سنطلب منهم معاملة مَن يمثل في حلفهم نظيراً لسليماني لمن يمثل نظيراً لنصرالله، بمثل ما قاله سليماني لنصرالله، مع صعوبة المقارنة والتشبيه في المقامات والمواقع. فإنْ اعتبروا سليماني القائد الفعلي الإيراني الذي لا يخضع لرئيس الجمهورية الإيرانية ويتهجّم عليه، كما تقول فضائياتهم، والذي يرتبط فقط وبصورة معنوية بالمرشد السيد الخامنئي، قلنا إنّ محمد بن سلمان في معسكرهم يوازيه، ومع حفظ الفوارق أيضاً، لو قلنا إنّ رئيس الحكومة سعد الحريري يوازي في المشروع السعودي في لبنان كما منصور هادي في اليمن، ما يسمّونه بمكانة السيد نصرالله في المشروع الإيراني، فهل يمكن أن نسمع محمد بن سلمان من باب المجاملة ورفع المعنويات يطلب تقبيل يد الحريري أو هادي؟

– تحدّث السيد نصرالله، وبكلّ وقار مهابته ومكانته لم يتبادل المجاملات والتحيّات مع الجنرال سليماني، ويشكره لكلامه النبيل، فالمقاومون منشغلون بما عليهم فعله، وليس بينهم بروتوكولات. وما قاله سليماني كان في سياقه واجب القول بنظره في سياق تقييم مسارات حرب الموصل، والحرب على الإرهاب والتذكير بمكانة المقاومة وقائدها. وما قاله السيد له سياق آخر، جوهره أنّ العراقيين صنّاع نصرهم، لأنهم اعتمدوا على أنفسهم فجاءتهم المعونة، لكنهم لم ينتظروا حتى الحلفاء والأصدقاء، ولم يُصغوا للأعداء، وسياق الكلام وصولاً للقول للبنانيين إنّ وجود الإرهابيين في عرسال بات مهانة ونقيصة بعد تحرير الموصل. فكيف وهو مصدر للخطر، ليختم السياق بالإعلان أنّ المقاومة حسمت أمرها، وكما هي دائماً ستكون حيث يجب أن تكون، وطبيعي أن لا يذهب السيد للحديث عن أنّ مساهمة إيران كانت صاحبة الفضل ويضيّع بوصلة قضيته فقط لأنه يريد ردّ التحية، التي لو كانت أقلّ بكثير من محمد بن سلمان للحريري بقيت الاحتفالات والخطب لأيامٍ وليالٍ عشر تتحدّث عن المكرمة الملكية، وعن الروح الأميرية.

(Visited 3٬362 times, 3٬362 visits today)

ISIS Wives, Filmed by Iraqi Police, Reveal Details of Their Lives

[ Ed. note – The US has been more interested in overthrowing the Assad government than in fighting the savage degenerates who kidnapped these women and turned their lives into hell–that’s something I hope people will keep in mind while watching the video above as well as while reading the article below.

And not only has the US been disingenuous in its supposed fight against ISIS, but US weapons and munitions, along with whole fleets of Toyota vehicles, have somehow mysteriously ended up in ISIS hands. Yet for some equally mysterious reason, ISIS militants don’t seem to be able to get their hands on Russian weapons–or at least I’ve yet to hear of it. At any rate, below are two articles from Sputnik, the first published today, while the second appeared back in February. One thing we can be thankful for is that Mosul is now liberated. ]


Daesh Wives Reveal Details of Their Lives


Wives of Daesh terrorists agreed to take part in a video interview conducted by Iraqi law-enforcement services. Sputnik received the exclusive footage from the Iraqi federal police.

The video depicts three women responding to police questions after their evacuation from Mosul.

The first woman said that she was forced to marry a terrorist by her uncle, who is also a member of Daesh. In this way, he hoped to get a promotion within the group, but later was killed. The woman now has a one-year-old child; the fate of her husband remains unknown.

Replying to the police’s questions, the woman said that she could not escape from her husband, because he kept her captive in the cellar for more than a year. After he found out that she tried to contact her relatives who serve in the army, he threatened to kill her.

When the second woman was asked if she was married to a Daesh militant, she only nodded affirmatively. Later she said that her husband was killed. The father of the woman was also a Daesh member, he was also killed a couple of days ago.

The third woman was holding a small child on her hands during the interview. Her husband was killed during an airstrike.

Commenting on the women’s statements, the head of the Iraqi federal police Shakir Jaudat told Sputnik that “women who agreed to answer questions in front of the camera are innocent. If they were involved in committing crimes, they would refuse to do so.”

According to Jaudat, the women’s testimony will be used for further investigations.

Daesh terrorists are notorious for their atrocities against civilians and, especially, their cruel treatment of women. Women are often used by Daesh militants as slaves and sometimes serve as snipers or work in financial departments within the terrorist group.


Torturing Their Own: Daesh Now Raping Sunni Women Too


Daesh fighters are detaining, ill-treating, torturing, and forcibly marrying Sunni Arab women and girls in areas under their control in Iraq – the first cases identified of such practices being inflicted against Sunni Arab women.

Human Rights Watch (HRW) researchers interviewed a number of women who fled the Daesh-controlled town of Hawija, to the northern city of Kirkuk. While HRW and the United Nations have previously documented extensive sexual abuses carried out by Daesh against Yazidi women, including the execution of 250 girls who refused to be sex slaves, this is the first time such abuses have been detected among the Sunni community.

One woman described being forced to marry her cousin, who then raped her; another had her home destroyed by militants after her husband deserted Daesh, and likewise forced to marry a fighter.

In April 2016, Daesh captured a large group of women who were attempting to escape Hawija and held them for months in an abandoned house, where they were raped in front of their children on a daily basis.

A woman, Aisha, recounted how her family was caught by Daesh trying to flee. They shot her son, and beat the female members of the group with rifle butts. The women were then lashed 65 times each, with more lashes added if they winced at the punishment. They were held for a fortnight, and only released after paying US$2,000.

Experts from four international organizations working with survivors of sexual assault in Iraq told HRW it is difficult to assess the prevalence of Daesh’ gender-based violence against women who have fled territory under their control. They said victims and their families remain silent to avoid stigmatization and harm to their reputations.

The women interviewed are all patients at the Kirkuk Center, where a staff of 12 provides psychological and behavioral counseling to women and children. The site has almost fallen victim to bombing attacks by the US and its allies on more than one occasion.

Continued here

%d bloggers like this: