Hasan Nasrallah: Hezbollah Is Making History Of Entire Region

Lebanon’s Hezbollah leader Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah addresses his supporters via a screen during a rally marking Al-Quds day in Beirut’s southern suburbs, Lebanon June 23, 2017. (REUTERS)

On September 12, Hezbollah leader Hasan Nasrallah said at a religious event that Hezbollah is “making the history of the region, not only the history of Lebanon”, according to the Lebanese al-Akhbar newspaper.

At the same event, he announced that Syria and its allies have won the war in Syria, according to the Lebanese al-Akhbar newspaper.

We have won in the war [in Syria], what remains are scattered battles,” Nasrallah said at the event.

Moreover, Nasrallah added that the Syrian opposition had failed to achieve anything, and now they want to negotiate to get some benefits. Nasrallah also said that the war on ISIS was harder and more dangerous than the war with Israel in 2006.

Since 2011 we knew that what was going on is a great conspiracy, and that there is a US-Israeli-Qatari-Saudi project that aims to eliminate the resistance and end the Palestinian cause,” Nasrallah said.

Nasrallah also revealed that at the beginning of the crisis in Syria he visited Iran and met with Supreme Leader of Iran Ali Khamenei to warn him from what is going on in Syria.

“Back then, everyone was convinced that the [Syrian] regime will fall after two or three months. We explained our view of the enemy project for him [Khamenei], and that if we didn’t fight in Damascus we will fight in Hermel, Baalbek, al-Dahieh, Ghazieh, the Western Beqaa and the South [of Lebanon] … The leader [Khamenei] agreed and continue: not only in these areas but also in Kerman and Khuzestan and Tehran … and he said [Khamenei]: this front has several axis: Iran axis, Lebanon axis and Syria axis and the leader of this axis, Bashar al-Assad… We should work for him to win and he will win,” Nasrallah said about his meeting with Khamenei.

Furthermore, Nasrallah revealed that after a year or two of the crisis Saudi Arabia told al-Assad that if Syria announce cutting its ties with Iran and Hezbollah in a press conference, the crisis will be over.

Nasrallah also said that Hezbollah warned its friends in Iraq that if they didn’t fight ISIS and it captured Deir Ezzor it will enter Iraq. Hezbollah prediction were indeed accurate and ISIS did enter Iraq because the Iraqis didn’t fight ISIS inside Syria back then.

This speech can be considered the most important speech by Nasrallah during 2017. As the speech reveals that the Syrian crisis in 2011-2012 was in reality moved by the political disagreement in the region, not by the will of the Syrian people.

Pro-Resistance Activists to Zionists: “If You Think about It, We’ll Wipe You out!”

A new front has been opened this week between the Zionist entity and pro-Lebanese resistance activists, but this time on social media.

wipe out2


Hezbollah Military Media Center launched a hashtag campaign dubbed: “If you (just) think about it (war against Lebanon), we’ll wipe you out,” with Hebrew subtitles, in response to an earlier message delivered by Israeli occupation military spokesman to the Arab press, Maj.Avichai Adraee.

wipe out3

The Israeli spokesman published on his account on social media (both Facebook and Twitter) a picture of himself holding a sign with Arabic words saying “If you dare, we will surprise you.”


In an another post, Adraee said: “They said ‘If You revert, We Too Will Revert,’ we say: ‘If you dare, we will surprise you,’” referring to the name of operation launched by Hezbollah against ISIL terrorists in Syria’s Qalamoun countryside.

Adraee post

The hashtag created by Hezbollah Military Media Center went viral on social media, with hundreds of pro-resistance activists used it, posting photos that portray the Israeli failure in Lebanon.

Source: Hezbollah Military Media Center

Hezbollah declares victory over Deash terrorists in Syria

Related Videos

Related Articles




South Front


Originally appeared at ZeroHedge

Clearly the war in Syria and the international push for regime change against Assad has created strange alliances in the Middle East over the past few years. Among the strangest bedfellows are the Israelis and Saudis. It’s no secret that common cause in Syria of late has led the historic bitter enemies down a pragmatic path of unspoken cooperation as both seem to have placed the break up of the so-called “Shia crescent” as their primary policy goal in the region. But that’s perhaps why few pundits seemed overly shocked when Israeli media late last week began reporting that a Saudi prince made a secret visit to Israel, in spite of the fact that the kingdom does not recognize the Jewish state, and the two sides do not have diplomatic relations.

Last Wednesday (9/6) Israel’s state funded Kol Yisrael radio service made cryptic reference to the “secret” yet historic visit while withholding names and specifics. “An emir of the Saudi royal court visited the country secretly in recent days and discussed with senior Israeli officials the idea of advancing regional peace,” the station reported. It added further that, “Both the Prime Minister’s Office and the Foreign Ministry refused to comment on the issue.”

Breaking News of Saudi Crown Prince's "Secret" Visit To Israel Brings Embassy Scramble

Left: Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu, Right: Saudi Arabia’s Deputy Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman

The visit is said to have occurred the same week Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu confirmed “unprecedented” relations with the Arab world. Netanyahu made the comments before members of the foreign ministry and said, “Things that are happening today between Israel and the Arab world are unprecedented. Cooperation on a wide range of issues are occurring behind the scenes, more than at any time in Israel’s history.”

But on Sunday reports began to emerge that the unidentified Saudi royal in question is no less than Crown Prince Mohammad bin Salman, which would indeed be shocking news:

On Sunday, the IUVM Online Arabic news outlet identified the Saudi official who reportedly visited Israel as Crown Prince Mohammad bin Salman, the Defense Minister of Saudi Arabia and heir apparent to the throne.

The IUVM Online report cited a United Arab Emirates intelligence officer, who claimed that bin Salman was the member of the Saudi royal family who met with Israeli officials in last week’s secret meeting.

Western journalists also began on Sunday to report the dignitary as being Crown Prince Salman – something which could have huge geopolitical consequences for the region given that such a high level meeting would possibly take place at all.

 Saudi Crown Prince Muhammad bin Salman was on secret visit to Israel. 

The reports were immediately disputed and subject to disbelief and controversy. As bin Salman’s name continued to circulate Sunday, the Saudi Embassy in Washington D.C. attempted to shut down news of the visit. A senior Saudi diplomatic official took to Twitter with a simple “Nope” in reference to the allegations.

Of course, if true such a dramatic move between the countries would signify a monumental shift in relations and outlook. On Sunday Israeli media was also broadly advancing bin Salman’s name as the Saudi emir in question.

Breaking News of Saudi Crown Prince's "Secret" Visit To Israel Brings Embassy Scramble

Multiple Israeli outlets on Sunday identified Deputy Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman as having met with senior Israeli officials early last week.

Though initial reports in Israeli media speculated that it could mean positive momentum on the Palestinian issue, it is unlikely that the future king of Saudi Arabia himself would suddenly pay a personal visit to Israel over an issue which has stalemated regional diplomacy for decades. It also doesn’t appear that Israeli policy on settlements has undergone any significant on the ground change. If true, public knowledge of the visit will certainly result in embarrassment for both countries, especially on the Saudi domestic front.

The initial Israeli public radio report referenced the visit of “an emir of the Saudi royal court” on Wednesday while saying the trip took place “in recent days”. As both Israel and Saudi Arabia have been so heavily invested in pursuing regime change in Syria, and at a time when other world powers seem to be backing off, it is inconceivable that Syria wasn’t high on the agenda during the unprecedented visit.

The timing of the meeting also seems more than just coincidental in relation to last week’s Israeli airstrike on a Syrian military facility, which took place in the middle of the night Wednesday (or more precisely Thursday morning at 3:00 am). As we reported at the time, Israel’s brazen act of aggression was designed to provoke a response from Syria. As the Syrian government stands poised to be victorious in the more than 6-year long conflict while rapidly regaining more and more territory, Israel seems desperate to keep the war going and is still making last ditch efforts to draw external powers deeper into Syria, though framing its aggression as “humanitarian”.

Could the two powers have been engaged in face to face talks over renewed efforts at ramping up the stalled war for regime change in Syria? After all, Israel’s declarations of its willingness to do anything to prevent an enduring Iranian presence in Syria have reached a new erratic pitch of late. During Netanyahu’s recent contentious summit with Vladimir Putin in Sochi, the Israeli leader reportedly warned Putin that Israel would not tolerate an enlarged and stronger Shia sphere of influence along Israel’s border. Yet the current trajectory of the war in Syria ensures just that, especially after the US-Russia brokered Astana agreement seemed to give tacit approval of Iranian troop presence in parts of Syria, while placing Russia in the driver’s seat. It was further revealed that a senior Israeli official accompanying Netanyahu on the trip threatened to assassinate Syrian President Assad by bombing his palace in Damascus, while further adding that Israel will seek to derail the Astana de-escalation deal.

As for Saudi Arabia, while its deep embroilment in inter-GCC diplomatic war with Qatar seems to have tempered what used to be routine calls for Assad’s departure, it must be remembered that the current unraveling of the GCC is ultimately benefiting IranIt is entirely possible that the Iran issue alone might drive the kingdom into direct engagement with Israel no matter the risks and political embarrassment (for example, news of the visit hands Iran a propaganda victory and likely more influence on the so-called Arab street, even perhaps within Saudi’s own domestic population).

Saudi Arabia could also be worried about future blowback from its well-documented actions in Syria. A WikiLeaks cable released in 2015 as part of the “Saudi Leaks” trove of internal leaked Saudi diplomatic memos speaks to just this scenario. Though the memo’s exact date is unknown, it was drafted sometime in early 2012 based on internal references in the Arabic text. It spells out the kingdom’s internal long term rationale on Syria: that should the Syrian regime “be able to pass through its current crisis in any shape or form” then increased “danger for the Kingdom” means Saudi Arabia must “seek by all means available and all possible ways to overthrow the current regime in Syria.” A full translation of the key passage reads as follows:

“In what pertains to the Syrian crisis, the Kingdom is resolute in its position and there is no longer any room to back down. The fact must be stressed that in the case where the Syrian regime is able to pass through its current crisis in any shape or form, the primary goal that it will pursue is taking revenge on the countries that stood against it, with the Kingdom and some of the countries of the Gulf coming at the top of the list. If we take into account the extent of this regime’s brutality and viciousness and its lack of hesitancy to resort to any means to realize its aims, then the situation will reach a high degree of danger for the Kingdom, which must seek by all means available and all possible ways to overthrow the current regime in Syria.

Whether or not it was in fact Crown Prince Salman that himself went to Israel, the timing of the high level delegation’s visit is simply impossible to ignore. Simply put, Syria was without a doubt discussed… and shortly thereafter Syria was bombed. Such direct and closer relations among perennial enemies could be a sign of more escalation and desperate measures to come in the region. This is certainly not – as Israeli media reported – a sign of regional peace.

Saudi Crown Prince’s Secret Trip to Tel Aviv: Riyadh Moving Closer towards Normalization with ‘Israel’

11-09-2017 | 14:39

Following the bold announcements of Zionist Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu regarding the unprecedented relationship between Tel Aviv and some Arab states, new information uncovered the secret visit made recently by a Gulf delegation to the occupation entity.


According to 360 ‘Israeli’ website, it was Saudi crown prince Mohammad bin Salman the leader of the delegation that met with Netanyahu secretly.

According to the website, an Emirati intelligence officer accompanied bin Salman, along with former General who is close to the royal family, Anwar Eshqi, beside several other senior figures.Meanwhile, Netanyahu’s office as usual declined to comment on the issue not to embarrass Saudi Arabia, which in parallel presents itself as defender of the Palestinian cause, fixed, and just rights of the Palestinian people, all denied by the ‘Israeli’ apartheid regime.Commenting on the issue, member of the “Coalition for al-Quds” Saleh al-Shwaiky stressed rejection of such visits no matter what are the circumstances.Speaking to the al-Ahed news website, al-Shwaiky said:

“According to us, we have a firm stance that criminalizes normalization of diplomatic ties with Zionist occupation regime, in addition to all suspicious attempts that some make secretly to get closer to the entity that is attacking our Palestinian people, land and sanctities.”

The Maqdessi activist wondered why some Gulf figures in particular want reconciliation with ‘Israel’ whilst neglecting their responsibilities in supporting the Palestinian cause.

He further censured the parity of this group with the colonial powers that are based on making Tel Aviv a natural part of the region without caring for the tragedies it caused to the Palestinians.

“Instead of fighting Yemen and killing civilians there, they should have moved towards the al-Aqsa Mosque that is being violated everyday by the Zionist settlers. They should have saved all the potentials and money to resist in Palestine and liberate al-Quds from the Zionist dirt.”

The Saudi crown prince’s visit to Saudi Arabia represents a turning point in the path towards normalizing ties between the Saudi Kingdom and ‘Israel’, paving the way for other sides to adopt the same policy that has been executed secretly for some considerations, which practically means aborting work to solve the Palestinian cause.

Source: Al-Ahed News

Related Videos

Related Articles

الأقصى وعرسال… تكامل الشعبي وتآمر الرسمي

الأقصى وعرسال… تكامل الشعبي وتآمر الرسمي

صابرين دياب

أغسطس 8, 2017

في الوطن العربي، ربّما بغير ما هو في معظم البلدان، يتناقض الشعبي والرسمي إلى مستوى تناحري. أينما يتّجه الرسمي، يأخذ الشعبي اتجاهاً آخر ينقضه وينفيه، ذلك لأنّ الرسمي نتاج تراث سياسي أنتجته الثورة المضادة على الأقلّ منذ سايكس – بيكو، فكان جرَّاء ذلك النبت القطري ببنيته السياسية المرتبطة بالخارج ارتباط يؤكده حبل سري مع المستعمر الغربي والكيان الصهيوني.

ودون عودة بعيدة حتى للتاريخ والوقائع الحديثة في الوطن العربي، فإنّ ما يدور اليوم وخاصة في لبنان، وفلسطين، يقدّم لنا صورة كاشفة عن حدثين نقيضين يعمل كل منهما في اتجاه مضادّ للآخر ونافٍ له.

على المستوى الشعبي في فلسطين، ولأكثر من أسبوعين دخل الشارع الفلسطيني المقدسي ومن تمكّن من الوصول من المناضلين/ات من المحتلّ 1948 جولة مواجهات ساخنة مع جنود وشرطة ومخابرات الكيان الصهيوني بكلّ ما وهبتها أميركا والغرب من سلاح وتقنية. اعتمد العدو أشدّ قمع ممكن وأسوأ حرب نفسية بهدف التحطيم المعنوي.

سلاحه القمعي ما وهبته إياه أميركا والغرب

وسلاحه النفسي تهافت معظم الحكام العرب على الاعتراف والتطبيع، وحتى التنسيق مع الكيان ضدّ المقاومة. لكن لا هذا ولا ذاك ثنى الفلسطينيين عن الإصرار عن مواجهة العدو بلا أيّ سلاح، سوى الوطنية والثقافة والدين والتاريخ، وهي الأسلحة التي يفتقر لها العدو مقابل افتقار جماهيرنا لسلاح القتل والخبث والفتك النفسيّين.

وكان للفلسطينيين ما أصرّوا عليه، لا معابر إلى ثالث الحرمين، إلى الأقصى، لا بوابات معدنية ولا خشبية ولا إلكترونية، ليعود العدو للبوابتين الكلاسيكيتين: نقاط التفتيش، وعيون العسس.

حاول المخروقون نفسياً ومعنوياً التقليل من الانتصار في حرب الموقع هذه، وحرب الموقع هي نعم: الانتصار في موقع، ومن ثمّ التكامل مع موقع، فمواقع أخرى منتصرة كما كتب انطونيو غرامشي، المناضل الإيطالي ضدّ الفاشية وصولاً إلى اصطفاف المواقع معاً لتشكل حرب جبهة واسعة.

ولكن، من جانبنا، لنا العبرة في ما يقوله العدو حيث الاشتباك الداخلي في أوساطه نقداً لسلطته الحالية التي تمثل أقصى العنجهية الصهيونية. هذا ناهيك عن استخدام معارضي سلطة العدو لهذه الهزيمة، في تعزيز رصيدها الانتخابي. وعليه، اعتقد محترفو الهزيمة من العرب بأنّ القدس انتصرت أم أنكروا ذلك، فلا قيمة لما يزعمون.

ولم يكن لدى نتنياهو سوى المتاجرة بقاتل المواطنين الأردنيين بدم بارد في عمّان، ليستقبل القاتل ويسأله السؤال الذي قُصد به تحقير النظام الأردني، وكأنّ هذا القاتل كان يقوم بعمل بطولي: «هل تحدّثت مع صديقتك»؟ وهو سلوك استفزازي تحقيري بمنتهى الصلف والصفاقة.

بعد انتصار الأقصى أو الانتصار للأقصى، لم تخجل أنظمة عربية وإسلامية كثيرة، من محاولة السرقة العلنية لشرف الموقف، لم يكن ذلك مدهشاً ولا مستغرباً، حيث الوقائع ظاهرة للعيان، ولكنها تكشف عن هشاشة البحث عن نصر ما، وسرقته بعد أن كانت هي نفسها في صف العدو بهذا الأسلوب أو ذاك!

في المقلب الآخر، كانت حرب الموقع تأخذ مجراها الشريف المشرّف في جرود عرسال في لبنان، حيث تتكاتف المقاومة والجيشان السوري واللبناني ونصف الدولة اللبنانية، للإجهاز على إرهابيّي النصرة بأسرع التوقعات وأقلّ التكاليف.

وكذا كان المقدسيّون وفلسطينيّو 1948 قد أهدوا نصر الأقصى للعرب والمسلمين، فإنّ المقاومة وسيّدها قد أهديا نصر عرسال لجميع اللبنانيين، وجميع المقاومين.

وأيضاً، إذا كان نصر القدس الجزئي، قد طعنته أكاذيب الأنظمة مكشوفة العورة، فإنّ انتصار عرسال طعنته الأنظمة نفسها، وقطاعات كثيرة من السياسيين في لبنان نفسه.

صحيح أنّ الأنظمة العربية التابعة تتواصل مع بعضها ومع الكيان الصهيوني، وتتمظهر جبهتها بلا مواربة، ولكن قوى المقاومة ودعمها الشعبي من القدس إلى عرسال إلى بيروت إلى دمشق، تتواصل على الأرض ميدانياً وروحياً.

ولعلّ هذا ما يؤكد لنا حقيقة، أن ّالمشترك العربي هو شعبي لا رسمي، وهذا ليس بالأمر البسيط، بل هو الأساس.


Related Videos 

Related Articles

CAIR Lies To U.S. Public, Offers Cryptic Support To Al-Qaeda

Ikhras اخرس

Photo published for Hizballah launches major operation on both sides of the Syrian-Lebanon border

Hizballah launches major operation on both sides of the Syrian-Lebanon border

Hizballah and Syrian regime forces have launched operations on both…


In solidarity with Al-Aqsa, Hizbullah terrorists launch a few new massacres against Syrians! http://fb.me/CsYMMiJd 

The Muslim Brotherhood-affiliated and Ikhras Shoe-Of-The-Month Award winning Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR) continues to lie to the U.S. public. After extensive consultations and planning with the Lebanese and Syrian governments, Hezbollah resistance fighters joined a coordinated assault on Al-Qaeda and ISIS terrorists based on the outskirts of the Lebanese town of Arsal. The operation unfolded on the mountainous, barren and unpopulated region of Joroud Arsal which spans the border of Lebanon and Syria. The highly anticipated assault took place after exhaustive negotiations failed to secure the Al-Qaeda fighters’ withdrawal from the area. The Syrian administration had agreed to permit the local Al-Qaeda leader, Abu-Malek Al-Talli (infamous for kidnapping a group of Nuns and chopping off the heads of kidnapped Lebanese soldiers), and his fighters to join their fellow “mujahideen” in the Al-Qaeda-held, Northern Syrian city of Idlib. When Al-Qaeda overran Idlib in March of 2015, this same CAIR “activist” congratulated the Syrian people on its “liberation.”

As a condition for his fighters’ withdrawal to Idlib, Abu-Malek demanded that he be provided safe passage to Turkey with tens of millions of dollars and all his wives. When it became apparent further negotiations would be futile, the Hezbollah resistance forces took part in a closely-coordinated operation with the Lebanese and Syrian militaries to uproot Al-Qaeda fighters from the region. Any force entering this desolate area with the intention to commit a massacre would be disappointed to discover it is uninhabited.

If the so-called activists and self-appointed spokespersons for U.S. Muslims at CAIR are not going to ikhras, they should at least refrain from lying to their fellow Americans and offering cryptic support for terrorists in the collective name of the U.S. Muslim community. Muslims who were born and raised in the Arab world, speak Arabic with native ability and are well-informed about Arab geography, politics and current events have a moral responsibility to tell the truth and expose CAIR activists’ cryptic support for terrorism and the lies peddled to the U.S. public in our collective community name.

Hezbollah Congratulates Palestinians: Only Resistance Path Can Liberate Occupied Land

Hezbollah flag

 July 27, 2017

Hezbollah congratulated on Thursday the Palestinian people on the great victory represented by obliging the Zionist enemy to cancel all the arbitrary measures it had taken in Al-Aqsa Mosque’s vicinity, noting that the Israelis aimed deeply at controlling this major Islamic symbol away from the Arabs and the Muslims.

In a statement, Hezbollah considered that this victory is the  fruit of the Palestinians’ steadfastness and bloody sacrifices made for the sake of protecting the sanctity Al-Aqsa from the Zionist desecration, adding that admitting the path of resistance is the only way to liberate the occupied land and regain the sanctities.

Hezbollah pointed out that the Palestinian uprising against the Zionist measures at Al-Aqsa Mosque is a shining torch which illuminates the path of the Umma that, according to the statement, has to provide the Palestinian people with all the forms of support.

Source: Hezbollah Media Relations



Related Videos

Related Articles

Sixty minutes with Nasser Kandil: Palestine, War on Syria, Egypt and the Defeat of Zio-Islamists in Qalamom

Related Videos

Related Articles

Hezbollah Flags Waved, «Israeli» Flags Burnt at London Embassy Protest

Hezbollah Flags Waved, «Israeli» Flags Burnt at London Embassy Protest

Local Editor

Scores of demonstrators vented their anger at new security measures at the al-Aqsa Mosque in al-Quds [Jerusalem]. Hezbollah flags were waved and “Israeli” flags were burned outside the “Israeli” entity’s London embassy over the weekend.

"Israeli" flag being burned in a UK protest

The Kensington protest on Saturday was organized by a group called Palestinian Forum in Britain to counter “‘Israeli’ aggression in Jerusalem [al-Quds]” after the apartheid “Israeli” regime introduced metal detectors following the killing of two policemen on 14 July.

Videos of the London protest, posted online by both Palestinian and “Israeli” supporters, show a group of young men seizing an “Israeli” flag, running away down the street with it, and later setting fire to it with a blowtorch.

Press Attaché Yiftah Curiel tweeted that the protesters were “sick” and “thugs” for “cheering on the bloodshed”.

Saturday’s event was one of a series of flare-ups around the world, with protests in Turkey, Jordon, Malaysia and Lebanon, as Muslim communities reacted to the apartheid entity’s new measures at one of Islam’s holiest sites.

In the Irish city of Derry, residents held a silent protest for Palestinians in Gaza, in which they lit a candle and shared a message of solidarity for Gaza’s population, who last month had their electricity supplies cut further.

israel | palestine | united kingdom | aqsa

Source: News Agencies, Edited by website team

25-07-2017 | 13:33

Palestine news

%d bloggers like this: