Syrian opposition says Palestinians are ‘living in paradise’


The Ugly Truth


‘Israel’s help is vital,’ says representative of Free Syrian Army in rare meeting with Israelis; Zionist Union MK insists ‘Assad must go’

Times of Israel

A rare public meeting between Israelis and Syrians in Jerusalem on Tuesday was interrupted by Palestinian protesters who expressed outrage that Syrians would work with Israelis. The protesters met with a furious response from the Syrians, who accused them of failing to understand what true oppression involves.

“You are living in a paradise compared to Syria,” Issam Zeitoun, a liaison for the Free Syrian Army with the international community, told the protesters as they refused to stop shouting and allow the event to continue. “You should be ashamed.”

The altercation occurred at a packed hall at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, where a Free Syrian Army liaison and a Syrian Kurdish representative spoke to students at an event organized by the university’s Harry S. Truman Research Institute for the Advancement of Peace.

“I wasn’t surprised by what happened. I expect that people will behave like this when I speak at an Israeli institution because it is really a serious matter,” Zeitoun told The Times of Israel afterwards.

“Many Syrians and Palestinians see us as traitors,” he said. “I don’t think anyone can judge Syrians for speaking with Israelis in public.

“The intensity of the conflict, and the number of the people we have lost, is too great, and I will personally do all that I can and speak with everyone, not just in Israel, but around the world, in order to change the situation,” he added.

After the protests had died down, Zeitoun told the crowd that Israeli aid to Syrians, which includes Israel’s well-known medical assistance — more than 2,000 Syrians have been treated in Israeli hospitals since 2013 — is not enough to influence the population to be more pro-Israel. He said there needed to be some action on the political level for the majority of Syrians to be swayed in its attitude to the Jewish state.

Zeitoun, who has become a familiar Syrian opposition representative in the Israeli press, argued that Israel should help create a safe zone in southern Syria, where he is from.

Zeitoun told The Times of Israel he did not believe Israel should intervene militarily, but should make itself felt politically in the Syrian conflict.

“Israel should play a role in getting the political cover from the Russians and the Americans [for a safe zone], and we’ll do the rest,” he said.

He argued that a safe zone could be created on Syria’s border with Israel, and would mark the start of a return to normalcy in the country, where civilian infrastructures such as schools and hospitals, not to mention civil society institutions, have been decimated by six years of bloody war.

The Syrian war has claimed over 400,000 lives, according to UN estimates, and driven millions from their homes.

The discussion was led by Zionist Union MK Ksenia Svetlova, a former journalist who covered the Arab world in Israeli and Russian media, a member of the Knesset Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee and the current chair of the Knesset’s caucus for Israeli-Kurdish relations. Syrian Kurdish author and journalist Sirwan Kajjo, who hails from the Syrian border town of Qamishili but now lives in Washington, DC, was also on the panel.

According to Svetlova, Israeli cabinet ministers, when they meet on Syria, often ask, “Who is there on the other side that we can talk to and prepare for the next stage?”

She noted that the Lebanese terror group Hezbollah, which is committed to destroying Israel, has grown stronger after six years of fighting in Syria.

“In 2017 we will see the increasing influence of Hezbollah. We will have to make hard choices in regard to action or inaction in Syria,” she said.

Speaking to The Times of Israel after the event, Svetlova criticized those who argue it would be better to allow Syrian strongman Bashar Assad to retake control of the country and bring the war to an end. That would inevitably lead to another rebellion, she contended.

“Every forceful control of a population will end up in rebellion. When they say we need to bring Assad back from the grave, they forget that the slaughter, and the chaos that erupted after, was his doing. To bring back the dictatorship is never the answer,” she said.

Asked if she would accept Assad’s return alongside political reforms, she responded, “If he was going to bring political reforms, he would have introduced them already.”

“Bringing him back will be much worse. It will strengthen [Islamic State] and [its affiliate] the al-Nusra Front because they will have more relevance,” she said.

Related Videos


فتاة فلسطينية لسوريين “معارضين” في القدس: أنتم عملاء

Related Articles

Traitors In Britain’s Leadership

Traitors In Britain’s Leadership

EDITOR’S CHOICE | 18.01.2017

Traitors In Britain’s Leadership

Investigative historian Eric Zuesse is the author, most recently, of  They’re Not Even Close: The Democratic vs. Republican Economic Records, 1910-2010, and of  CHRIST’S VENTRILOQUISTS: The Event that Created Christianity

When a UK Prime Minister, such as the Conservative David Cameron, does the work of a foreign power, working for that foreign power and against UK’s democratic ideals, and also against the interests and values (such as equal-rights, and UK’s sovereign independence) which are held by the UK public, then that UK Prime Minister is perpetrating treason, whatever else it might also be called. This has happened, and yet no one pays attention to it: no one is even pointing out that it is treason. (Whether it is, in every sense of the word, we’ll get to, after the story here has been told, but that story must come first; only afterward can it be discussed.)

Following are highlights from the shocking and uncontested (though confusingly written) original Al Jazeera investigative news report published on January 8th, which had mentioned this treachery only in passing (but without calling it that). These excerpts will make clear the severity of what has actually been happening here — and of what is continuing to happen.

I shall add [in brackets] clarificatory adjectives etc., so as to help make instantly clear who is who, in this confusingly written story, and thus speed and ease a reader’s comprehension of the stunning narrative that’s being told here:

8 January 2017, Al Jazeera Investigative Unit

Israel apology after plot against UK politicians

Al Jazeera reveals discussions of Israeli diplomat and UK civil servant to ‘take down’ anti-settlement politicians.

The Israeli embassy has apologised to UK deputy foreign secretary [Conservative] Sir Alan Duncan for comments made by one of its staff members [Mr. Shai Masot] on plans “to take [him [Duncan]] down” due to his [Duncan’s] criticism of Israel’s settlement activity in the occupied [Palestinian] West Bank.

The comments, made by a senior political officer at the Israeli embassy [Mr.] Shai Masot, were secretly captured on film during a six-month undercover operation by Al Jazeera’s Investigative Unit, which reveals plots by the Israeli diplomat [Masot] and a British civil servant [Duncan] to destroy the careers of senior politicians [whom Israel wanted to be downed].

In a conversation with Maria Strizzolo, who was then chief of staff to MP [Member of Parliament] Robert Halfon, the deputy chairman of the ruling Conservative Party, [Israel’s Mr.] Masot asked her [the Conservative Strizzolo] if he [Masot] could give her some names of MPs [whom] he [Masot] would suggest she “take down” [on behalf of Israel].

[See it at 2:14 in this video, where his actual phrase was “Can I give you some MPs that I would suggest you take down?”]

Masot named [recommended to Strizzolo] Duncan, who in 2014 said that while he fully supports Israel’s right to exist, he believes [Jewish] settlements on occupied Palestinian land represent an “ever-deepening stain on the face of the globe”. He [Duncan] also likened the situation in Hebron in the occupied West Bank to apartheid…

Strizzolo… revealed that she had a strategy of manipulation to ensure Israel remains at the top of the UK’s foreign policy agenda.

“If at least you can get a small group of MPs that you know you can always rely on, when there is something coming to parliament and you know you brief them, you say: ‘You don’t have to do anything, we are going to give you the speech, we are going to give you all the information, we [the office of MP Robert Halfon] are going to do everything for you’,” she said.

She also advised trying to infiltrate Prime Minister’s Questions, a weekly session in which the leader of the country answers questions from MPs. The debate is televised live.

“If they already have the question to table for PMQs [Prime Minister’s Questions], it’s harder to say: ‘No, no, no, I won’t do it’,” she said.

Strizzolo then boasted how her own efforts once made an immediate effect on the national debate. …

In 2014, she [had] persuaded MP Halfon to question the prime minister in public over three missing teenagers believed to have been kidnapped and murdered “to get a response from the government”, Strizzolo said.

Halfon took the request and called on former prime minister David Cameron to support the Israeli government. …

In response, Cameron promised that Britain would “stand by Israel”.

Cameron there was a pushover for Halfon, who clearly was an agent for Israel. But was this treason only by Halfon, and not also by his boss and fellow-Conservative, Cameron?

To say that Cameron, as the principal decision-maker, who was a pushover for a foreign power’s stooge — the traitor who was acting on behalf of a foreign power — wasn’t himself acting treasonously here, would be to say that, for example, there is no such thing as criminal negligence, which is a criminal liability for failure to have done due diligence in carrying out one’s duties to the public as the nation’s chief of state.

Cameron, not Halfon, was the actual decision-maker here, the responsible party in the matter: as Harry Truman had said of the U.S. Presidency, “The buck stops here.”

This is comparable to the Inspector General of the TARP bailout of the megabanks, Christy Goldsmith Romero, recommending (and the U.S. government ignoring):


I propose that Congress remove the insulation around Wall Street CEOs and other high-level officials by requiring the CEO, CFO and certain other senior executives to sign an annual certification that they have conducted due diligence within their organization and can certify that that there is no criminal conduct or civil fraud in their organization.

But, in the case of a head-of-state — a nation’s CEO — the obligation to do due diligence and to take full responsibility, for everything that one does and says that actually affects the public, and responsibility for the nation’s relationships with other nations: this due-diligence obligation for a head-of-state, is even more severe than it is for a private CEO.

A country that tolerates such negligence or worse (evil intent) from its rulers, cannot be a democracy, because that country’s international relations are being manipulated by a foreign power — placing another nation’s leadership above one’s own. That’s subversion, of the given nation. It is treason, for any public official.

In the United States, the aristocracy are trying to fool the public into believing that the incoming President Donald Trump is such a traitor (‘Russian agent’) (and no evidence has been presented to the public for that, except ‘evidence’ concocted by a former British spy); but in this case involving Israel and the Prime Minister of UK, there is even video of the Israeli agent Masot communicating to Strizzolo, who then communicates to MP Halfon, and who brags that she had formerly communicated to Halfon who then communicated to the Prime Minister, who then acted in accord with the Israeli government’s back-channel instruction. Was it really an “instruction,” though — or was it instead some type of international deal, a trading-of-favors between allied countries? Precisely what favors are being performed by Israel, to UK? Really? And would that secret international agreement — without any democratic approval by the domestic public — be something that a democracy would allow?

In any case, even if there was some secret deal that induced Cameron to fulfill upon Israel’s instruction, that secret treaty (the deal) had not been entered into by the Constitutionally authorized process. This alone would be violation of oath-of-office — on behalf of a foreign power. It would be treason.

Secret deals, unauthorized treaties (in effect), ended up producing World War I. They are exceedingly dangerous. Doing international relations this way is inconsistent with democracy.

But that’s what happened here in UK’s Party on the ‘right’, the Conservatives. However, Israeli attempts at subversion of the UK government happen also in UK’s Party of the ‘left’, Labour; and, the video that was linked-to is devoted primarily to that — to the Labour Party.

Like happens in the United States, the main Party on the ‘left’ is being torn between viewing things mainly in terms of tribal conflicts (‘Palestinians’ versus ‘Jews’), or else viewing things mainly in terms of conflicts between the government and the public — the rulers versus the ruled (irrespective of their ‘tribe’). In Israel, the rulers are, essentially, only the Jews who hold power; and the ruled include many people (the “Palestinians”) who are excluded from many rights that all “Jews” in Israel enjoy. The current leader of Britain’s Labour Party, Jeremy Corben, rejects the Jewish state’s tribal values; and, consequently, he is being called ‘anti-Semitic’ by his opponents, both within and outside his Party. In today’s Israel, to oppose racism is to be ‘anti-Semitic’. A certain type of racism is policy in today’s Israel. Adolf Hitler, a supreme European tribalist, is thus now retrospectively a paragon of Israeli values: tribalism (racism). The current Israeli government is in Hitler’s image, only less consistently, and choosing a different tribe to reward, and a different tribe to punish (and, of course, far less certain than he was of the ultimate morality of their cause, and thus also far less intense about their application of the resulting punishment than he was, in his blinding hatred; but, after all, he was the paragon of bigotry) — differing with him, on those things. The current Israeli government equates nazism (the ideology, not Germany’s particular nazi party) with good, and equality with bad: they say that to be opposed to the current state of Israel is to be an ‘anti-Semite’. And this type of value-system is being worked secretly upon the UK’s government, in Britain’s back rooms, with alien (in particular, Israeli) lobbyists.

That video, which I linked to at its 2:14, continues on for a full 26 minutes, and mainly presents there the conflict within UK’s Labour Party, over these two mutually incompatible views of Israel and the Palestinians: one view, championed by the anti-Tony-Blair and anti-Iraq-War, progressive, new leader of the Labour Party, Corben, is a view which refuses to take sides with Israel against its Palestinians; and the other view, the one which is championed by Israel’s apartheid government, identifies that equalitarian position with “anti-Zionism,” and then promptly identifies ‘anti-Zionism = anti-Semitism’, meaning that every Jew (or at least ones who aren’t themselves ‘anti-Semitic’) endorses the current apartheid Israeli government. This ridiculous lie, equating equalitarianism with ‘anti-Semitism’, assumes that any Israeli who rejects Israel’s current, apartheid, government, hates Jews, instead of hates racists. It’s “Big Brother” thinking: a conviction that bad is good, white is black, up is down, peace is war, etc.

Israel works secretly in America’s back rooms, too. Some people worry that President Trump will be a Russian agent. Some people worry more realistically that he will be an Israeli agent. And some people worry that he will be a Saudi agent (because the royal Saud family hate Iran, and Trump seems to believe that the Saudi royal family, who are Saudi Arabia’s government, are allies not enemies of America, and that Iran is America’s eternal enemy). Others worry whether Trump will be intelligent enough, or even honorable enough, to avoid being any foreign agent at all. But whereas there is strong reason to consider Britain’s David Cameron to have been an Israeli agent, there is no reason, yet, to think that Trump is any foreign agent at all. Only time will tell.

In UK, time already has told the reality on this; and another and much briefer al-Jazeera video, which was posted on January 7th by UK’s Guardian, presents a conversation between Masot and Strizollo, in which Masot tells Strizollo that the Israeli government isn’t satisfied with the extent to which UK’s Conservative Party has silenced the Conservative Foreign Minister Boris Johnson’s insistence upon a “two-state solution”: his insistence upon a situation in which Palestinians will be freed from domination by Israel’s ‘Jews’ — freed from the aristocrats (many of whom live in America, actually) who, in reality, control and determine Israel’s apartheid government.

Yet another brief al-Jazeera video shows that Strizzolo’s immediate response when Masot asked her “Can I give you some MPs that I would suggest you take down?” might have been to think of that assertion — the question he posed — as being an attractive invitation by Israel to, perhaps, help her boss by blackmailing some of his opponents: she said, “Well, I know that if you look hard enough, I’m sure that there is something that they’re trying to hide.” But, whether she was thinking there, of that question as representing Israel’s Mossad, intelligence agency, and what help it might be able to offer to the Conservative cause, isn’t entirely clear. However, this video opened with Masot’s telling Strizzolo that his career-aspiration “is to be the head of the Foreign Affairs Department of the Intelligence Department in Israel — I’m not a career diplomat.” So, maybe it’s in the context of his being an aspiring spy, that she was considering the ways in which she might be able to be of help to both her boss, and also the young and rising Israeli agent who was, perhaps, propositioning her.

Such statecraft, in the seedy real world, was repeatedly condemned by the people who wrote America’s Constitution. They thought of it as being the type of international relations that the nation they were starting should avoid, at all costs. They could hardly imagine that “it comes with the territory” (as the vernacular might phrase the matter).

It’s dangerous to democracy in any country.

“جيش لحد” السوري .. يبيع سورية وفلسطين لإسرائيل بـ”خارطة طريق”

"جيش لحد" السوري .. يبيع سورية وفلسطين لإسرائيل بـ"خارطة طريق"

المصدر: عاجل – مواقع
القسم: سياسة – محلي
16 كانون الثاني ,2017  01:44 صباحا
تقدمت ما تسمّى “جبهة الإنقاذ الوطني” التي يقيم أفرادها في عواصم الخارج، بما سمته “خارطة طريق” للسلام بين سورية وإسرائيل.

وكشف محرر الشؤون الشرق أوسطية في الإذاعة الإسرائيلية، أنّ “خارطة الطريق” تتضمن اعترافاً بـ”دولة إسرائيل وإيجاد تسوية عادلة لقضية الجولان ترضي كلا الشعبين السوري والإسرائيلي، والانتقال بالعلاقة بين سورية وإسرائيل من مرحلة العداء إلى مرحلة الصداقة والتعاون ثم التحالف والعلاقات الاستراتيجية”.

ونشرت صحيفة المنبر اليهودي TRIBUNE JUIVE التي تتناول الشأن الإسرائيلي واليهودي في العالم، نصّ “خارطة الطريق” التي كتبها منسق “جبهة الإنقاذ الوطني” المدعو “فهد المصري” ةوالذي يقدّم نفسه على أنه “معارض سوري”، حيث تلخّصت في خمس فقرات حول “ضمان أمن إسرائيل، ومهام الأجهزة الأمنية والعسكرية في سورية الجديدة، القضية الفلسطينية، إيران وأدواتها، هضبة الجولان”.

وأضافت اذاعة الاحتلال: إن “خارطة الطريق تتضمن أيضاً إلغاء مخيمات اللاجئين الفلسطينيين في سورية وتحويلها إلى مناطق سكنية”، مشيرة إلى أن الخارطة تتضمن أيضاً حل كل فصائل المقاومة الفلسطينية الموجودة على الأراضي السورية.

وفيما يتعلق بإيران، فإن الوثيقة التي عرضتها ما تسمى “جبهة الإنقاذ الوطني السورية المعارضة”، تنص على “طرد جميع الخبراء الإيرانيين وعناصر حزب الله من الأراضي السورية”.

وكان فهد المصري المتحدث باسم ما يسمى “مجموعة الإنقاذ الوطني”، وجه رسالة مسجلة بالصوت والصورة إلى إسرائيل يدعوها فيها إلى “دعم الشعب السوري ليس بالأعمال الإنسانية فقط بل بتوسيع رقعة المساعدات”.

وجاء في فقرة “أمن واستقرار إسرائيل” في خارطة الطريق المزعومة، أنّ “سوريا الجديدة” لن تكون معادية لدولة إسرائيل أو أي دولة أخرى سواء في المنطقة أو في العالم، وأنها لن تدعم أي مجموعات عسكرية مسلحة تهدف لتخريب “أمن إسرائيل” ولن تفتح لها مراكز تدريب على الأراضي السورية، كما أنها لن تكون مكاناً للتخطيط لاستهداف أمن واستقرار إسرائيل وكذلك الأمن والاستقرار الإقليمي والدولي.

وبحسب “الجبهة”، فإنّ “أمن واستقرار إسرائيل مرتبطان بضرورة رحيل الرئيس السوري بشار الأسد ونظامه، وعودة الأمن والاستقرار في سورية، في ظل وجود سلطة قوية بعد الأسد”، كما أنّ الفوضى والتطرف والإرهاب تفرض تشكيل نظام عسكري انتقالي، ودعم المرحلة الانتقالية يتطلب دعماً من “القوات العربية المشتركة” ومن تركيا برعاية الأمم المتحدة.

وفي فقرة “الأجهزة الأمنية والجيش الوطني في سورية الجديدة”، اقترحت ماتسّمى “جبهة الإنقاذ المعارضة”، إعادة بناء الجيش والأجهزة الأمنية والشرطة على أسس “مهنية”، تضمن أمن الحدود واستعادة الأمن والاستقرار، مع الحفاظ على الأمن الوطني والإقليمي ومكافحة التطرف والإرهاب، إضافة إلى عدم مشاركة ماسمّته بـ “الجيش الوطني” في أزمات أو صراعات خارج الحدود السورية. وأكّدت أنّ الأسلحة السورية يجب أن تكون “أسلحة دفاعية” تهدف إلى ضمان الأمن الداخلي والاستقرار الوطني، وعلى “الجيش الوطني” أن لا يسعى لامتلاك أي نوع من أسلحة الدمار الشامل.

واقترح “المصري”، أن لا تتجاوز الفترة الإلزامية للخدمة العسكرية السورية ستة أشهر، ودعم عملية البناء والتنمية وعودة اللاجئين السوريين إلى وطنهم.

أما فقرة “القضية الفلسطينية” ضمن “خارطة الطريق”، فقد تضمّنت اقتراحاً بمنح الجنسية السورية للاجئين الفلسطينيين في سورية، وتحويل مخيمات اللاجئين الفلسطينيين في سورية إلى مناطق سكنية إضافةً إلى حلّ جميع “الجماعات المسلحة”، وجميع المنظمات السياسية الفلسطينية المتواجدة على الأراضي السورية.

وأشارت الجبهة المعارضة في مقترحها إلى ضرورة حظر نشاط وعمل جميع المنظمات الفلسطينية في الأراضي السورية وخاصّة منظمتي حماس والجهاد الإسلامي “الإرهابيتين”، وأن تكون البعثة الدبلوماسية التابعة للسلطة الفلسطينية في سورية الممثلة الوحيدة والشرعية للفلسطنيين داخل سورية، كما أنّه سيتم تأسيس علاقة جديدة للدولة السورية مع الممثل الشرعي للفلسطينيين المعترف به دولياً.

وفي فقرة “إيران وأدواتها” كما جاءت في الخارطة، طالبت جبهة الإنقاذ الوطني بـ”إلغاء جميع الاتفاقيات الموقّعة بين طهران ودمشق وطرد جميع الخبراء والضباط العسكريين ورجال الأمن الإيرانيين وكل الدبلوماسيين الإيرانيين وإغلاق السفارة الإيرانية والمراكز الثقافية والدينية وجميع الجمعيات والمنظمات التابعة لإيران في سوريا”.

كما أشارت “الجبهة المعارضة” إلى ضرورة “طرد ميليشيات حزب الله والميليشيات العراقية والأفغانية وغيرها من سورية، واعتبار حزب الله حزباً إرهابياً، واتخاذ كافة الإجراءات القانونية ضدّ إيران وجميع المنظمات التابعة لها للحصول على تعويض مالي لمشاركتها في الحرب” في سورية.

وأكّدت الجبهة في تلك الفقرة، على “حظر نقل الأسلحة إلى لبنان عبر سورية، وتدمير جميع الأنفاق السرية بين البلدين”، وتحميل الدولة اللبنانية المسؤولية الكاملة عن مشاركة حزب الله في القتال في سوريا، وكذلك الأمر مع الحكومة العراقية عن مشاركة “ميليشيات عراقية” في القتال على الأراضي السورية.

وما يسمّى “جبهة الانقاذ الوطني المعارضة”، كانت شكرت في منتصف الشهر الماضي الاسرائليين الذين تظاهروا ضد الحكومة السورية والرئيس الأسد في سوريا.

وأضاف البيان: “إننا نشكر الإسرائيليين الذين لبوا نداءنا وخرجوا للتظاهر كما نشكر جميع المبادرات الأهلية في كل بقاع الارض والتي خرجت للتعبير عن رفضها ما يحدث من فظائع وجرائم حرب وجرائم ضد الانسانية في حلب وعموم سورية”.

وفي وقت سابق، بعث منسق “جبهة الإنقاذ الوطني” فهد المصري برسالة إلى “إسرائيل” خلال حديث خاص مع الإذاعة الإسرئيلية يدعوها إلى إقامة “منطقة آمنة” في الجنوب السوري، وبناء مرحلة جديدة معها، وأشار حينها إلى أنّ “سورية ما بعد الأسد لن تكون معادية لإسرائيل” على حدّ تعبيره.

Stop Everything You Do and Watch This!!!

January 11, 2017  /  Gilad Atzmon

Al Jazeera Investigations – The Lobby EP 1

So that you learn how Israel and its Lobby are plotting against Britain and the Brits.

So you learn about our treacherous MPs who are shamelessly serving a foreign state and its foreign interests.

Ask yourself, how is it that the most important news about the institutional betrayal of our political system is delivered to us by a Qatari TV network? Shouln’t it be  The Guardian, the BBC or The Daily Telegraph that look into these matters? Is it a coincidence?

The Israeli Embassy told us that Shai Masot was a junior employee. Watch this video and judge for yourself, he seems to run the entire Labour Party.

Britain must probe the activity of the Jewish Lobby and the Israeli Embassy immediately !!!

And if you want to understand why this plot is embedded in Jewish culture just read this.


Treason and Plot: The Israel Scandal (subtitled)

January 11, 2017  /  Gilad Atzmon

Palestinian Colonel Arrested over Criticizing Abbas Presence at Peres Funeral

Palestinian Authority Chief Mahmpud Abbas shakes Israeli PM Banjamin Netanyahu's hand at Shimon Peres' funeral in al-Quds

Palestinian Authority sacked on Friday Colonel Ossama Mansour over a message he wrote to criticize the PA president, Mahmoud Abbas, for offering condolences for the death of former president of Zionist entity Shimon Peres.

According to Palestinian newspapers, Ramallah government arrested Mansour – one day after sacking him – over the same reason, without providing any justification for that. PA agencies sabotaged the Colonel’s house after his arrest.

Before his arrest, Mansour said he accepts the PA’s decision to be fired although he didn’t insult Abbas. However, his arrest sparked a wave of Palestinian activists who demanded the authority to release him.

“We have been rolled with reactions and everyone roared back when it was announced you were heading to console over Shimon Peres .. the founder of settlements whom you are calling to stop .. in addition to his practices after Oslo accord and his statements and participation in the continuous Palestinian suffering. In any case, whether he is a terrorist or not .. whether he is the founder of Ccracking Bones theory during the first intifada or not .. whether he has to do with the massacre at the Jenin refugee camp and the massacre of Jasmine neighborhood in Nablus or not .. whether he has to do with the massacre at Qana [in Lebanon] or not .. whom does he represents so that he made you to head to participate in his funeral whereas most of your people refuse,” Mansour wrote in his letter.

“You can pass by the mother of martyr Yasser Hamdouni and ask her permission. If she agrees, you can go. If she doesn’t agree, you have to make up your decision then. If you decided to participate by yourself in the funeral of the killer of our sons, you would be mistaken. And if you decided so after consultation, you would be misled. There must not be personal or friendly relations with the occupier as long as he continues the policy of arrogance against our people,” Colonel Mansour added.

Source: Al-Manar Website


Increasing dissatisfaction in Palestine with the quisling Mahmoud Abbas

Palestinians have been circulating and signing a document of dissociation form Mahmoud Abbas.  It is amazing that in all the fawning coverage of Peres in US media, none really covered the depth of anger and contempt of him by Arabs (young and old).

It says: “O, ugly face.  I attest to God that I detest you.  You have broken our backs, and hijacked our victory, and aided our enemy, and turned our friends against us, and blackmailed our people, and starved our folks, and besieged our lands.  You have dropped our cause, and accepted humiliating  and permitted debacles.  You betrayed Gaza, and prevented dignity.  Your grey hair is a shame, and your face is fire, and your goodness is lowly, and your evil is revenge.  The tongues of adults, and children have cursed you, o jack ass”.  (It all rhymes in Arabic except the jackass bit at the end).

Even the “Youth of Fath” at Beir Zeit are protesting this humiliating participation.

Related Videos


 Related Articles

“If the Our Messenger, Prophet Mohammad, is Alive he will attend the funeral of Perez”: Abbas’s “Mufti”

Prophet Mohammad participated in his  Jewish neighbor’s funeral  and Perez is “our neighbor” Mahmoud Habbash,  the adviser of Abbas for religion affairs ,said responding to Palestinians slaming Abbas for taking part in Peres funeral,

Celebrations in Abbastan and Hamastan (Edited)


Peres, is our neighbor if you like it or not, he added



Fact Check
Let us check what Allah said in Holly Quran

لَّا يَنْهَاكُمُ اللَّهُ عَنِ الَّذِينَ لَمْ يُقَاتِلُوكُمْ فِي الدِّينِ وَلَمْ يُخْرِجُوكُم مِّن دِيَارِكُمْ أَن تَبَرُّوهُمْ وَتُقْسِطُوا إِلَيْهِمْ إِنَّ اللَّهَ يُحِبُّ الْمُقْسِطِينَ   الممتحنة (8)

Allah does not forbid you from those who do not fight you because of religion and do not expel you from your homes – from being righteous toward them and acting justly toward them. Indeed, Allah loves those who act justly.

إِنَّمَا يَنْهَاكُمُ اللَّهُ عَنِ الَّذِينَ قَاتَلُوكُمْ فِي الدِّينِ وَأَخْرَجُوكُم مِّن دِيَارِكُمْ وَظَاهَرُوا عَلَىٰ إِخْرَاجِكُمْ أَن تَوَلَّوْهُمْ وَمَن يَتَوَلَّهُمْ فَأُولَٰئِكَ هُمُ الظَّالِمُونَ   الممتحنة (9)  –

Allah only forbids you from those who fight you because of religion and expel you from your homes and aid in your expulsion – [forbids] that you make allies of them. And whoever makes allies of them, then it is those who are the wrongdoers.



مستشار محمود عباس : لو كان الرسول بيننا لحضر جنازة بيريز

مستشار محمود عباس : لو كان الرسول بيننا لحضر جنازة بيريز

دافع محمود الهباش مستشار الرئيس الفلسطيني محمود عباس للشؤون الدينية عن مشاركة الاخير ووفد موسع من السلطة في جنازة “ شمعون بيريز “ ،وقال ان الرسول محمد لو كان حيا بيننا لشارك بهذه الجنازة.

وقال الهباش ان هذه المشاركة تاتي في اطار “الحنكة السياسية” و”قطع الطريق على المتربصين بالمشروع الوطني” الذين ارادوا ان يضعوا الرئيس في موقف محرج ليرفض المشاركة ويظهر بانه معادي للسلام والتوجهات الدولية، حسب قوله.

واضاف الهباش بكل ثقة أن الرسول لو كان حيا بيننا لشارك بهذه الجنازة، واكد على قوله هذا بان الرسول عليه السلام شارك بجنازة جاره اليهودي، وما بيريز الا جار شئتم ام ابيتم”، حسب تفسيره لأقوال الرسول.

واستشهد الهباش بحديث منقول عن الرسول حدث أثناء جنازة يهودي يقول فيه الرسول في نهايته “أليست نفسا”، مبررا لرئيسه مشاركته في عزاء أحد أكبر مجرمي الكيان “الاسرائيلي”.


الجزائر ساخطة على ابو مازن وكل من شارك في جنازة شيمون بيريز السقاح برتبة رجل سلام


%d bloggers like this: