• Home
  • About Palestine
  • Jewish terrorists supported Hitler, not Islam, but this racist bus advert is allowed in Philadelphia
  • Links
  • Modern Islamic Studies
  • Nasralla
  • Nasser and the real Arab spring
  • Our Mission
  • Palestinian homes an easy target for theft by Israeli forces

UPROOTED PALESTINIANS: SALAM ALQUDS ALAYKUM

Entries RSS | Comments RSS
  • Authors

    • Amro Allan عمرو علان
    • fada1
    • indigoblue76
    • mala114
    • martyrashrakat
    • samivesusu
    • uprootedpalestinians
    • worldpeacewithjustice
    • Zara Ali
  • Who Killed Thikra

  • The Quranic view on dialogue with others-Haidari

  • What every Muslim needs to know

    النيأ العظيم === Islam and Muslims

    مفهوم الحرية واستعمال العنف

    الاسلام والمسلمون Islamic jurisprudence crisis

    أزمة الفقه الإسلامي

    Pillars of Islam and the pillars of faith

    أركان الإسلام وأركان الإيمان

    More here (1 to 44) The Qur’an, Morality and Critical Reason (PDF)
  • The great prophecy of the demise of Israel

    The Numerical great miracle المعجزة الكبرى - عدنان الرفاعي - نبوءة زوال إسرائيل
    More
  • Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

    Join 2,083 other followers

  • Pages

    • About Palestine
    • Jewish terrorists supported Hitler, not Islam, but this racist bus advert is allowed in Philadelphia
    • Links
    • Modern Islamic Studies
    • Nasralla
    • Nasser and the real Arab spring
    • Our Mission
    • Palestinian homes an easy target for theft by Israeli forces
  • Top Posts & Pages

    • The Rule of Law Over Fraud: Biden Election May Be Illegal, as Four Basic Legal Principles Ignored
    • What is to be Done?
    • Welcome to the “New Woke USA”: Twerk on Washington!
    • Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov – annual Q&A press conference in Moscow
    • Baghdad on the Potomac: Welcome to the Blue Zone
    • America’s Demise Is Near At Hand
    • SADAT: Blackwater… with a Turkish-Islamic Flavor!
    • US economic decline and global instability
    • 80 Million Kremlin Agents In United States
    • Trump’s Opponents Succeeded With Their Government Coup (Ruslan Ostashko)
  • Recent Posts

    • Trump’s Opponents Succeeded With Their Government Coup (Ruslan Ostashko)
    • Welcome to the “New Woke USA”: Twerk on Washington!
    • بايدن المحاط بالتناقضات لن «يشيل الزير من البير»
    • Baghdad on the Potomac: Welcome to the Blue Zone
    • What is to be Done?
    • Terrorism Industry : America is preparing Adel Abdel Bari to succeed Al-Zawahiri صناعة الإرهاب: أميركا تحضّر عادل عبد الباري خلفاً للظواهري!؟
    • US economic decline and global instability
    • America’s Demise Is Near At Hand
    • The Rule of Law Over Fraud: Biden Election May Be Illegal, as Four Basic Legal Principles Ignored
    • الفرصة الذهبيّة لوليد جنبلاط
    • IRAN EXPANDS INTELLIGENCE NETWORK NEAR JORDAN AND ISRAEL
    • 80 Million Kremlin Agents In United States
    • Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov – annual Q&A press conference in Moscow
    • NATO Supremacists New Round of Frenzied War Crimes in Syria
    • لهذه الأسباب باتت المقاومة تشكل خطراً داهماً على الكيان الصهيوني والمشروع الاستعماري في المنطقة
  • Recent Comments

    • crisscross767 on Dozens of Deaths from Covid Vaxxing
    • crisscross767 on Dozens of Deaths from Covid Vaxxing
    • roberthstiver on Israeli Media Joins Lebanese-Arab Campaign against Al-Qard Al-Hasan Association, Mossad Detecting Depositors’ Accounts
    • roberthstiver on Iranian Nuclear Weapons. Is Israel Too Scared To Strike?
    • crisscross767 on Fearmongering?! Norway Links 13 Deaths to Pfizer Vaccine
  • Sharmine Narwani

    • WHAT THE SYRIAN DEATH TOLL REALLY TELLS US
    • Assad’s Removal is Not on Moscow’s Mind
    • Moscow’s Mind
    • Lebanon’s Red Lines, Bared
    • Russia and China: Arms around the Middle East
    • Debate on Syria: Chemical Weapons, Foreign Intervention, Regime Change and More…
    • I Want My Sunni Back
    • New Phase in Syria Crisis: Dealmaking Toward An Exit
    • Questioning the Syrian “Casualty List”
    • How Iran Changed The World
    • Homs Opposition: Al Farouq Battalion is Killing Us
    • Excuse Me, But Israel Has No Right To Exist
    • Crunch Time in Syria: The UN Protocol’s Jihadist Loophole
    •  Who’s Afraid of the UN Observer Mission?
    • Hollywood in Homs and Idlib?
    • High-Tech Trickery in Homs?
    • Ruppert Murdoch & Hezbollah’s "Scuds"
    • Western Journalist: Visa Denied
    • Hamas: “Anyone who is awaiting change from the West today will not get any change”
  • Reham Alhelsi

      • The ‘Black Sunday’ of Palestine: Oyoun Qarra Massacre, 20.05.1990
      • My Name is Palestine: 64 Years Later, Time for Justice!
      • Salute to the Daughters of Palestine; the Mothers of Palestinian Political Prisoners
      • Palestinian Political Prisoners: Breaking the Chains of Oppression, Marching towards Freedom
      • Palestinian Prisoners on Hunger Strike: The Struggle for Freedom, for Justice, for Palestine Continues
      • On Land Day: In Occupied Palestine, Existence is Resistance
      • A Letter to Mother Palestine and her Daughters
      • Hunger Strikers for Freedom, for Justice, for Dignity, for Palestine
      • A Homage to Palestinian Mothers
      • The Women of Palestine and the Struggle for Liberation
      • On International Women’s Day, Palestinian Political Prisoners Remain the Spearhead of Resistance
      • Hana‘ Ash-Shalabi; A Struggle Against Administrative Detention
      • Ash-Shalabi: A Family from Palestine
      • Khader Adnan; Ledendary Steadfastness from Palestine
      • Jaba’, the Tears of Palestine and Zionist Racism
      • Khader Adnan: 60 Days of Legendary Steadfastness
      • Call me a Palestinian from Palestine
      • PA Political Terminology 101: When Talks Are Not Talks
      • One Heart; Beating for Palestine
      • A free Palestine: Free from the River to the Sea
      • Embracing the Land
      • A Trilogy: The Road to “Independence” (2)
      • A Trilogy: The Road to “Independence” (1)
      • Returning to Jerusalem
      • 63 Years Later, Palestine From River To Sea
      • They Call it “Independence” … We Call it Nakba
      • The On-Going Nakba of Palestine … 63 Years Later
      • Remember Beita …. Remember Awarta
      • On Land Day, Listen to the Land
      • Occupied Palestine from A to Z: Basma – a Woman from Palestine
      • On International Women’s Day: Remember Palestinian Female Prisoners
      • Because They Are Not Just Numbers in a List: “Generals of Patience”
      • To a Child who Dreamt of Freedom
      • “Traffic Accidents” in occupied Palestine: Another Form of Zionist Terrorism
      • This is Our Land and This is Our Blood
      • No Justice for Jerusalem: Murdering Palestinian Jerusalemites in Cold Blood
      • Palestinian Prisoners: A Symbol of Resistance, Steadfastness and Pride
      • Oyoun Qarra Massacre, 20 May 1990
      • Our Paradise on Earth
      • 62 Years, 62 Messages: We have A Home and it’s Called Palestine
      • Palestinian Women and Children in Jewish gulags
      • A Nation Behind Bars: Palestinian Political Prisoners in Israeli Detention
      • How little they have changed in 62 years
      • A Thousand Carnations for Palestinian Mothers
      • Zionist Definition of Religious Tolerance: If it’s not Jewish, either we Judaize it or we Destroy it! (II) 
      • Palestine, forgive us;
      • One Year On: Gaza Steadfast and Defiant amidst a World that has lost its Humanity
      • The Tale of 3 Palestinian Villages
      •  This is how a Nakba is carried out
      • 61 Years of On-Going Nakba: the Old Still Live through Us and the Young Never Forgot
      • 61 years of Nakba, 418 Palestinian villages destroyed
      • Get up, stand up for Palestinian Rights on May Day and Every Day
      • Palestinian Prisoners: Imprisoned for their Love of Freedom
      • They can’t take that away from me: "settlers" stealing Palestinian land from under our feet
  • Archives

    • January 2021
    • December 2020
    • November 2020
    • October 2020
    • September 2020
    • August 2020
    • July 2020
    • June 2020
    • May 2020
    • April 2020
    • March 2020
    • February 2020
    • January 2020
    • December 2019
    • November 2019
    • October 2019
    • September 2019
    • August 2019
    • July 2019
    • June 2019
    • May 2019
    • April 2019
    • March 2019
    • February 2019
    • January 2019
    • December 2018
    • November 2018
    • October 2018
    • September 2018
    • August 2018
    • July 2018
    • June 2018
    • May 2018
    • April 2018
    • March 2018
    • February 2018
    • January 2018
    • December 2017
    • November 2017
    • October 2017
    • September 2017
    • August 2017
    • July 2017
    • June 2017
    • May 2017
    • April 2017
    • March 2017
    • February 2017
    • January 2017
    • December 2016
    • November 2016
    • October 2016
    • September 2016
    • August 2016
    • July 2016
    • June 2016
    • May 2016
    • April 2016
    • March 2016
    • February 2016
    • January 2016
    • December 2015
    • November 2015
    • October 2015
    • September 2015
    • August 2015
    • July 2015
    • June 2015
    • May 2015
    • April 2015
    • March 2015
    • February 2015
    • January 2015
    • December 2014
    • November 2014
    • October 2014
    • September 2014
    • August 2014
    • July 2014
    • June 2014
    • May 2014
    • April 2014
    • March 2014
    • February 2014
    • January 2014
    • December 2013
    • November 2013
    • October 2013
    • September 2013
    • August 2013
    • July 2013
    • June 2013
    • May 2013
    • April 2013
    • March 2013
    • February 2013
    • January 2013
    • December 2012
    • November 2012
    • October 2012
    • September 2012
    • August 2012
    • July 2012
    • June 2012
    • May 2012
    • April 2012
    • March 2012
    • February 2012
    • January 2012
    • December 2011
    • November 2011
    • October 2011
    • September 2011
    • August 2011
    • July 2011
    • June 2011
    • May 2011
    • April 2011
    • March 2011
    • February 2011
    • January 2011
    • December 2010
    • November 2010
    • October 2010
    • September 2010
    • August 2010
    • July 2010
    • June 2010
    • May 2010
    • April 2010
    • March 2010
    • February 2010
    • January 2010
    • December 2009
    • November 2009
    • October 2009
    • September 2009
    • August 2009
    • July 2009
    • June 2009
    • May 2009
    • April 2009
    • March 2009
    • February 2009
    • January 2009
    • December 2008
    • November 2008
    • October 2008
    • September 2008
    • June 1843
    • June 1813
    • January 1514
  • Follow UPROOTED PALESTINIANS: SALAM ALQUDS ALAYKUM on WordPress.com
  • Blog Stats

    • 2,044,147 hits

When the People Rose up: How the Intifada Changed the Political Discourse on Palestine

Posted on December 18, 2020 by uprootedpalestinians

December 16, 2020

December 8 marks the 33rd anniversary of the First Palestinian Intifada. (Photo: File)

By Ramzy Baroud

December 8 came and went as if it was an ordinary day. For Palestinian political groups, it was another anniversary to be commemorated, however hastily. It was on this day, thirty-three years ago, that the First Palestinian Intifada (uprising) broke out, and there was nothing ordinary about this historic event.

Today, the uprising is merely viewed from a historic point of view, another opportunity to reflect and, perhaps, learn from a seemingly distant past. Whatever political context to the Intifada, it has evaporated over time.

The simple explanation of the Intifada goes as follows: Ordinary Palestinians at the time were fed up with the status quo and they wished to ‘shake off’ Israel’s military occupation and make their voices heard.

Expectedly, the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) quickly moved in to harvest the fruit of the people’s sacrifices and translate them into tangible political gains, as if the traditional Palestinian leadership truly and democratically represented the will of the Palestinian people. The outcome was a sheer disaster, as the Intifada was used to resurrect the careers of some Palestinian ‘leaders’, who claimed to be mandated by the Palestinians to speak on their behalf, resulting in the Madrid Talks in 1991, the Oslo Accords in 1993 and all other ‘compromises’ ever since.

But there is more to the story.

Thousands of Palestinians, mostly youth, were killed by the Israeli army during the seven years of Intifada, where Israel treated non-violent protesters and rock-throwing children, who were demanding their freedom, as if enemy combatants. It was during these horrific years that such terms as ‘shoot to kill’ and ‘broken-bones policies’ and many more military stratagems were introduced to an already violent discourse.

In truth, however, the Intifada was not a mandate for Yasser Arafat, Mahmoud Abbas or any other Palestinian official or faction to negotiate on behalf of the Palestinian people, and was certainly not a people’s call on their leadership to offer unreciprocated political compromises.

To understand the meaning of the Intifada and its current relevance, it has to be viewed as an active political event, constantly generating new meanings, as opposed to a historical event of little relevance to today’s realities.

Historically, the Palestinian people have struggled with the issue of political representation. As early as the mid-20th century, various Arab regimes have claimed to speak on behalf of the Palestinian people, thus, inevitably using Palestine as an item in their own domestic and foreign policy agendas.

The use and misuse of Palestine as an item in some imagined collective Arab agenda came to a relative end after the humiliating defeat of several Arab armies in the 1967 war, known in Arabic as the ‘Naksa’, or the ‘Letdown’. The crisis of legitimacy was meant to be quickly resolved when the largest Palestinian political party, Fatah, took over the leadership of the PLO. The latter was then recognized in 1974 during the Arab Summit in Rabat, as the ‘sole legitimate representative of the Palestinian people’.

The above statement alone was meant to be the formula that resolved the crisis of representation, therefore drowning out all other claims made by Arab governments. That strategy worked, but not for long. Despite Arafat’s and Fatah’s hegemony over the PLO, the latter did, in fact, enjoy a degree of legitimacy among Palestinians. At that time, Palestine was part and parcel of a global national liberation movement, and Arab governments, despite the deep wounds of war, were forced to accommodate the aspirations of the Arab people, keeping Palestine the focal issue among the Arab masses as well.

However, in the 1980s, things began changing rapidly. Israel’s invasion of Lebanon in 1982 resulted in the forced exile of tens of thousands of Palestinian fighters, along with the leaderships of all Palestinian groups, leading to successive and bloody massacres targeting Palestinian refugees in Lebanon.

The years that followed accentuated two grave realities. First, the Palestinian leadership shifted its focus from armed struggle to merely remaining relevant as a political actor. Now based in Tunis, Arafat, Abbas and others were issuing statements, sending all kinds of signals that they were ready to ‘compromise’ – as per the American definitions of this term. Second, Arab governments also moved on, as the growing marginalization of the Palestinian leadership was lessening the pressure of the Arab masses to act as a united front against Israeli military occupation and colonialism in Palestine.

It was at this precise moment in history that Palestinians rose and, indeed, it was a spontaneous movement that, at its beginning, involved none of the traditional Palestinian leadership, Arab regimes, or any of the familiar slogans. I was a teenager in a Gaza refugee camp when all of this took place, a true popular revolution being fashioned in a most organic and pure form. The use of a slingshot to counter Israeli military helicopters; the use of blankets to disable the chains of Israeli army tanks; the use of raw onions to assuage the pain of inhaling teargas; and, more importantly, the creation of language to respond to every violent strategy employed by the Israeli army, and to articulate the resistance of Palestinians on the ground in simple, yet profound slogans, written on the decaying walls of every Palestinian refugee camp, town or city.

While the Intifada did not attack the traditional leadership openly, it was clear that Palestinians were seeking alternative leadership. Grassroots local leadership swiftly sprang out from every neighborhood, every university and even in prison, and no amount of Israeli violence was able to thwart the natural formation of this leadership.

It was unmistakably clear that the Palestinian people had chosen a different path, one that did not go through any Arab capital – and certainly not through Tunis. Not that Palestinians at the time quit seeking solidarity from their Arab brethren, or the world at large. Instead, they sought solidarity that does not subtract the Palestinian people from their own quest for freedom and justice.

Years of relentless Israeli violence, coupled with the lack of a political strategy by the Palestinian leadership, sheer exhaustion, growing factionalism and extreme poverty brought the Intifada to an end.

Since then, even the achievements of the Intifada were tarnished, where the Palestinian leadership has used it to revive itself politically and financially, reaching the point of arguing that the dismal Oslo Accords and the futile peace process were, themselves, direct ‘achievements’ of the Intifada.

The true accomplishment of the Intifada is the fact that it almost entirely changed the nature of the political equation pertaining to Palestine, imposing the ‘Palestinian people’, not as a cliche used by the Palestinian leadership and Arab governments to secure for themselves a degree of political legitimacy, but as an actual political actor.

Thanks to the Intifada, the Palestinian people have demonstrated their own capacity at challenging Israel without having their own military, challenging the Palestinian leadership by organically generating their own leaders, confronting the Arabs and, in fact, the whole world, regarding their own moral and legal responsibilities towards Palestine and the Palestinian people.

Very few popular movements around the world, and throughout modern history, can be compared to the First Intifada, which remains as relevant today as it was when it began thirty-three years ago.

 – Ramzy Baroud is a journalist and the Editor of The Palestine Chronicle. He is the author of five books. His latest is “These Chains Will Be Broken: Palestinian Stories of Struggle and Defiance in Israeli Prisons” (Clarity Press). Dr. Baroud is a Non-resident Senior Research Fellow at the Center for Islam and Global Affairs (CIGA) and also at the Afro-Middle East Center (AMEC). His website is www.ramzybaroud.net

Share this:

  • Share
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Email

Like this:

Like Loading...

Filed under: Nazi Israel, Palestine, Palestinians, Tunis | Tagged: ABBAS, Arab regimes, Arafat, Intifada, Invasion of Lebanon, Naksa Day, Oslo, PLO, Ramzy Baroud, Zionist barbarism | Comments Off on When the People Rose up: How the Intifada Changed the Political Discourse on Palestine

Tunisia’s PM: Normalisation with Israel ‘Not on Agenda’

Posted on December 15, 2020 by uprootedpalestinians

December 15, 2020

Tunisia has no plans to match Morocco’s decision to recognize Israel, Prime Minister Hichem Mechichi said, insisting that establishing relations with the Jewish state was “not on the agenda”.

Last week, Morocco became the fourth country in the Arab League to recognise Israel since August, in a flurry of diplomatic deals brokered by outgoing US President Donald Trump.

Pro-Palestinian protesters hold a stand outside the UAE embassy in Tunisia against #Israel –#Emirates normalization deal.@PalMissionUK pic.twitter.com/CQfpjb87Sf

— Laila Palestinian girl (@LailaPalestini1) August 21, 2020

The United Arab Emirates, Bahrain, and Sudan have also recently normalized ties with Israel as part of a push that weakens the Arab world’s previously united front over the Palestinians’ struggle for statehood.

“We respect Morocco’s choice, Morocco is a sister country that we love very much,” Mechichi told France 24 broadcaster in an interview late Monday.

But, he said, “for Tunisia, the question is not on the agenda.”

Mechichi said he had not been approached by the Trump administration about the issue.

A Tunisian journalist tears apart photos of bin Zayed and Netanyahu on air in protest against the normalization deal between the United Arab Emirates and Israel #UAEIsrael #Tunisia pic.twitter.com/PW3UmaXtYD

— Press TV (@PressTV) August 24, 2020

“Every country has its own reality, its own truth and its own diplomacy, which it considers best for its people,” he said.

Neighbouring Algeria took a less charitable view of the deal struck with arch-rival Morocco, under which Washington recognized Morocco’s sovereignty over the disputed Western Sahara region in exchange for Rabat normalizing ties with Israel.

Algeria, which backs the Polisario independence movement in Western Sahara, said the move was part of “foreign maneuvers which aim to destabilize Algeria”.

(The New Arab, PC, Social Media)

Share this:

  • Share
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Email

Like this:

Like Loading...

Filed under: Palestine, Tunis | Tagged: High treason Recognition not "normalization" | Comments Off on Tunisia’s PM: Normalisation with Israel ‘Not on Agenda’

Ten years on the lie of the Arab Spring! عشر سنوات على أكذوبة الربيع العربيّ!

Posted on December 11, 2020 by martyrashrakat

Ten years on the lie of the Arab Spring!

See the source image

Dr. D.Mohammed Sayed Ahmed

I know that the title of the article may be a clash with some hardliners who do not accept a negative word on the so-called Arab Spring,  who always describe it as a revolution,  especially in Tunisia and Egypt. 

In order to comfort these people from  the beginning, I confess to them that I  personally was one of the  participants  in the events of January 25th in Egypt and I was one of those opponents of Mubarak’s policies and successive governments. In January, I did not accept  reform,  I was a hardliner who wanted to bring about a radical change in the structure of society, and I saw that the structure  of Egyptian society  had suffered a lot of social,  economic, political and cultural damage, and that it was time for change.

However, far from emotions and through a scientific and objective view, it was necessary to assess  what happened 10 years after the outbreak of the so-called Arab Spring, and through a review of the research heritage that has taken place over the past 10 years it is clear that the majority of  researchers and scholars from different disciplines (politics, economy, sociology, media) have given a preliminary judgement on the events that took place in some Arab countries  (Tunisia, Egypt, Yemen,  Libya, Syria)  at the end of 2010 and the beginning of 20111 as revolutions. It is strange that many  of these studies have put the concept of revolution in the title of the study, and thus have been  issued as required from the beginning, and the researcher himself, although researchers and leading scholars, did not bother to try to verify these events; did he actually live up to the revolution or not?  We did not find a single study that tried to answer this question. Are the events and interactions  witnessed by some Arab countries amounting to a revolution?

Here it must be emphasised that the revolution, as the majority of literature in the social  sciences see it,  is «to bring about a positive radical change in the social, economic, political and  cultural structure  of  society.  This scientific definition of the revolution leads us to the conclusion  that revolutions are not judged by their causes and motives or through their events and interactions,  but by their consequences. If society does not see a radical positive change in its social,  economic,  political  and cultural structure, the events and interactions that have paved the way for the causes and motives that  we cannot describe as revolution, but must seek another concept, especially since there are many  concepts  that may overlap and resemble the concept of revolution in terms of causes,  motives, events  and  interactions, but differ in terms of results such as the concept of popular  uprising, mass  movement, protest movement and others.

Therefore, it is clear that the majority of studies carried out over the past 10 years have  recognised  that what happened is an Arab Spring and Arab revolutions that have accelerated governance  through causes, motives, events and interactions without waiting to judge according to the results.  In each society is different from what the other society has seen, each society has its own structural and historical specificity and it is not permissible to mix papers and generalise.

Montage photo qui exprime le dégoût des Tunisiens à l'égard de ce mercenaire du Qatar et agent du sionisme.
Montage photo qui exprime le dégoût des Tunisiens à l’égard de ce mercenaire du Qatar et agent du sionisme.

In a recent study we monitored the results of this so-called spring, the  results in Tunisia say that the  social, economic, political and cultural  impact of the mass movement witnessed in Tunisia at the end of 2010  was  negative on the structure of society and did not reflect positively on the vast majority of  citizens.

See the source image

The results in Egypt were very similar, and the  January 25  movement did not  make a  positive change  in the  structure  of society, and the situation  of  the vast majority  of citizens did not  improve,  but their  living conditions  deteriorated  from what they  were under Mubarak.

In Yemen, events have destroyed the structure of society, civil and regional strife prevailed,  external aggression has occurred, people have been displaced and diseases and epidemics have spread, and Yemen has become vulnerable to division.

See the source image

The results in Libya indicate that what happened is an external  aggression that coveted the wealth of the  Libyan people, which ultimately destroyed the structure  of society, and Libya entered a  crisis  that  had been  internationalised, and there was no glimmer of hope to resolve it soon, and in deeds  the idea of partition was perpetuated.

The results confirm that Syria has been subjected to an external conspiracy, which led to a global war  with states that brought terrorist elements to the proxy war, which led to the destruction of the structure of Syrian society, displacement, asylum and the migration of millions of people.

See the source image
 McCain’s ‘Moderate Rebels’ in Syria ARE ISIS

The results in its entirety indicate that the radical positive change in the social, economic, political and cultural structure of society caused by the revolutions has not been witnessed by any Arab society  from the five societies that witnessed the events, so the precise scientific characterisation says  that  what happened in Egypt and Tunisia is by no means up to the level of the revolution, what  happened in  Egypt and Tunisia popular uprisings did not achieve their objectives, what happened in Yemen a power  struggle turned into a civil war and external aggression, what happened in Libya is an  external  aggression, and what happened in Syria is an external conspiracy to undermine its foundations.

Thus, we can say that the so-called Arab Spring is a lie promoted through the colonial media machine,  what has happened is the implementation of the new Middle East plan aimed at dividing and fragmenting our societies and of course exploiting some internal reasons and motives to move the popular masses, so the Arab public opinion must wake up and realise that the project is not finished  and the plans of the American and Zionist enemy will remain in place, but are now being developed  through the so-called peace and normalisation agreements.

عشر سنوات على أكذوبة الربيع العربيّ!

د. محمد سيد أحمد

This image has an empty alt attribute; its file name is Untitled-304-780x470.png

تحلّ علينا خلال أيام الذكرى العاشرة لأحداث الربيع العربي المزعوم، وبالطبع أعلم أنّ عنوان المقال قد يكون صداماً لبعض المتشدّدين الذين لا يقبلون كلمة سلبية على هذه الأحداث ودائماً ما يصفونها بالثورة خاصة في تونس ومصر. ولكي نريح هؤلاء منذ البداية أعترف لهم أنني شخصياً كنت أحد المشاركين في أحداث 25 يناير في مصر وكنتُ أحد المعارضين لسياسات مبارك وحكوماته المتعاقبة. وفي يناير لم أكن أقبل بالإصلاح فقد كنتُ من المتشددين الذين يرغبون في إحداث التغيير الجذري في بنية المجتمع، وكنت أرى أن بنية المجتمع المصريّ قد أصابها الكثير من العطب على المستوى الاجتماعي والاقتصادي والسياسي والثقافي، وأنه قد حان وقت التغيير.

لكن بعيداً عن العواطف ومن خلال نظرة علمية وموضوعية كان لا بد من تقييم ما حدث بعد مرور عشر سنوات على اندلاع شرارة الربيع العربي المزعوم، ومن خلال مراجعة التراث البحثي الذي تم خلال العشر سنوات الماضية يتضح أن غالبية الباحثين والعلماء من تخصصات مختلفة ( سياسة – اقتصاد – اجتماع – إعلام) قد أصدروا حكماً مبدئياً على الأحداث التي شهدتها بعض الدول العربية ( تونس – مصر – اليمن – ليبيا – سورية) في نهاية العام 2010 وبداية العام 2011 بأنها ثورات. ومن الغريب أن كثيراً من هذه الدراسات قد وضع مفهوم الثورة في عنوان الدراسة، وبذلك يكون قد صادر على المطلوب منذ البداية، ولم يكلف باحث نفسَه، رغم أنهم باحثون وعلماء كبار، أن يحاول التحقق من هذه الأحداث؛ وهل بالفعل ترقى لمستوى الثورة أم لا؟ فلم نجد دراسة واحدة حاولت الإجابة على هذا السؤال. هل ما شهدته بعض الدول العربية من أحداث وتفاعلات يرقى لمستوى الثورة؟

وهنا يجب التأكيد على أن الثورة كما ترى غالبية الأدبيات في العلوم الاجتماعية هي «إحداث تغيير جذري إيجابي في بنية المجتمع الاجتماعية والاقتصادية والسياسية والثقافية». وهذا التعريف العلميّ للثورة يقودنا إلى استنتاج يقول إن الثورات لا يحكم عليها من خلال أسبابها ودوافعها ولا من خلال أحداثها وتفاعلاتها بل يحكم عليها بنتائجها. فإذا لم يشهد المجتمع تغييراً جذرياً إيجابياً في بنيته الاجتماعية والاقتصادية والسياسية والثقافية، فإن الأحداث والتفاعلات التي مهدت لها أسباب ودوافع لا يمكن أن نقوم بتوصيفها بمصطلح الثورة بل يجب البحث عن مفهوم آخر، خاصة أن هناك مفاهيم كثيرة قد تتداخل وتتشابه مع مفهوم الثورة من حيث الأسباب والدوافع والأحداث والتفاعلات، لكنها تختلف من حيث النتائج مثل مفهوم الانتفاضة الشعبية والحراك الجماهيري والحركة الاحتجاجية وغيرها.

ومن هنا يتضح أن غالبية الدراسات التي تمّت عبر العشر سنوات الماضية وسلّمت بأن ما حدث هو ربيع عربي وثورات عربية قد تسرّعت في الحكم من خلال الأسباب والدوافع والأحداث والتفاعلات من دون الانتظار للحكم وفقاً للنتائج، لذلك كان من الضروري الآن وبعد مرور عقد من الزمان على هذه الأحداث طرح السؤال التالي: هل ما حدث في بعض المجتمعات العربية يرقى بالفعل لأن نطلق عليه مصطلح ثورة أو أن نطلق عليه إعلامياً أنه ربيع؟ والإجابة على هذا السؤال تتطلب بحثاً دقيقاً فيما أفضت إليه الأحداث في كل مجتمع عربي على حدة، فما حدث في كل مجتمع يختلف عما شهده المجتمع الآخر، فلكل مجتمع خصوصيته البنائية والتاريخية ولا يجوز خلط الأوراق والتعميم.

وفي دراسة حديثة لنا قمنا برصد النتائج التي أفضى إليها هذا الربيع المزعوم، فجاءت النتائج في تونس تقول إن المردود الاجتماعي والاقتصادي والسياسي والثقافي للحراك الجماهيري الذي شهدته تونس في نهاية العام 2010 جاء سلبياً على بنية المجتمع ولم ينعكس بشكل إيجابي على الغالبية العظمى من المواطنين.

وجاءت النتائج في مصر متشابهة إلى حد كبير فلم يحدث حراك 25 يناير تغييراً إيجابياً في بنية المجتمع، ولم تتحسن أوضاع الغالبية العظمى من المواطنين، بل تدهورت أحوالهم المعيشية عما كانت عليه في عهد مبارك.

وفي اليمن أدّت الأحداث لتدمير بنية المجتمع وساد الاحتراب الأهلي والمناطقي، وحدث العدوان الخارجي، وتشرّد الشعب وانتشرت الأمراض والأوبئة، وأصبح اليمن عرضة للتقسيم.

وتشير النتائج في ليبيا إلى أن ما حدث هو عدوان خارجي طمعاً في ثروات الشعب الليبي، أدى في النهاية إلى تدمير بنية المجتمع، ودخول ليبيا في أزمة تم تدويلها، ولا يوجد بصيص أمل في حلها قريباً، والواقع يكرّس فكرة التقسيم.

وتؤكد النتائج أن سورية قد تعرضت لمؤامرة خارجية، أدّت إلى نشوب حرب كونية مع دول جلبت عناصر إرهابية للحرب بالوكالة، وهو ما أدّى لتدمير بنية المجتمع السوريّ، ونزوح ولجوء وهجرة ملايين من أبناء الشعب.

والنتائج في مجملها تشير إلى أن التغيير الجذري الإيجابي في بنية المجتمع الاجتماعية والاقتصادية والسياسية والثقافية التي تحدثها الثورات لم يشهدها أي مجتمع عربي من المجتمعات الخمسة التي شهدت الأحداث، لذلك فالتوصيف العلمي الدقيق يقول إن ما حدث لا يرقى بأي حال من الأحوال لمستوى الثورة، فما حدث في مصر وتونس انتفاضات شعبية لم تحقق أهدافها، وما حدث في اليمن صراع على السلطة تحول لحرب أهلية وعدوان خارجي، وما حدث في ليبيا عدوان خارجي استعماري، وما حدث في سورية مؤامرة خارجية لتقويض دعائم مشروعها المقاوم.

وبذلك يمكننا القول إن ما يُطلق عليه الربيع العربي هو أكذوبة يتم الترويج لها عبر الآلة الإعلاميّة الاستعماريّة، فما حدث هو تنفيذ لمخطط الشرق الأوسط الجديد الذي يستهدف تقسيم وتفتيت مجتمعاتنا وبالطبع استغل بعض الأسباب والدوافع الداخلية لتحريك الجماهير الشعبية، لذلك يجب أن يفيق الرأي العام العربي ويدرك أن المشروع لم ينته وستظل مخططات العدو الأميركي والصهيوني قائمة، بل يتم تطويرها الآن عبر اتفاقيات السلام والتطبيع المزعومة، اللهم بلغت اللهم فاشهد.

Share this:

  • Share
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Email

Like this:

Like Loading...

Filed under: Egypt, Libya, Syria, The War on Yemen, Tunis, War on Syria, War on Yemen | Tagged: "Arab Spring", Color Revolutions, Protest Movement | Comments Off on Ten years on the lie of the Arab Spring! عشر سنوات على أكذوبة الربيع العربيّ!

Mohammed bin Zayed’s Mission Impossible: Alliance with Israel

Posted on July 26, 2020 by indigoblue76

By David Hearst
Source: Middle East Eye

The Abu Dhabi crown prince wants to turn his statelet into another Israel

Abu Dhabi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Zayed has extended the UAE’s reach across the region in conflicts from Yemen to Libya (AFP)

The mentor

Islamism in any form, political or militant, is a fraction of the force it used to be in 2011, and for the foreseeable future it is incapable of summoning hundreds of thousands onto the streets, and toppling regimes, as it once did in Tunisia, Egypt and Yemen.

Islamism in any form, political or militant, is a fraction of the force it used to be in 2011

And yet the counter-revolution, unleashed when Mohamed Morsi was toppled as Egypt’s president in 2013, continues furiously. 

It produces identikit dictators: Mohammed bin Salman in Saudi Arabia, Abdel Fatah el-Sisi in Egypt, Khalifa Haftar in Libya, all pour scorn on free elections, live like pharaohs, and create dynasties for their family and sons. 

They are all beholden to one man who has either funded, armed or mentored their rise to power. 

This man is the organising genius of coups in Egypt; he has become a major player in the civil war in Libya; he is leveraging his country’s ports to become a presence in the Horn of Africa; he has pushed the Saudis into a war in Yemen to promote late Yemeni President Ali Abdullah Saleh’s son, and then ditched that strategy to promote southern separatists; he was instrumental in launching the blockade of his neighbour Qatar; he introduced an unknown Saudi prince to the Trump clan and cast the CIA’s man in Riyadh on the scrap heap. 

There is no pie in which Mohammed bin Zayed, the crown prince of Abu Dhabi, doesn’t have a finger. He rarely makes speeches or gives interviews and when he does he comes across as casual, reticent, softly spoken.

On the rare occasions he talks to a journalist as he did to Robert Worth of the New York Times, he portrays himself as the reluctant first responder, the fireman dousing dangerous wildfires: the September 11 attacks (two of the hijackers were Emiratis) and the Arab Spring were two such galvanising events. 

This is an act, and largely for a Western audience.

MbZ’s ‘Islamist menace’

 As time has elapsed, this can not be the whole story. As MbZ has developed his counter-jihad, so have the ambitions expanded of this quiet, English-speaking, Sandhurst-trained prince. 

MbZ knows how to manipulate decisions in the White House. He can read their ignorance, arrogance, and personal greed. His money goes directly into their pockets

Thwarting the looming Islamist menace – as he describes it – can no longer account for the ambition, scope and cost of his dreams. The Islamist menace of his nightmares is largely dormant.

A shrewd observer, he can see, as clearly as anyone, the US crumbling as an organising power in the Middle East. He knows how to manipulate decisions in the White House. He can read their ignorance, arrogance, and personal greed. His money goes directly into their pockets. He can play on the chaos of real-time decision-making in the Oval Office like a mandolin.

It must have occurred to him that the Middle East needs a new ruler. Why not him? It’s time, he has judged, to move out of the shadows and lay out his own stall.

So what’s the mission?

Mission statement

This was, some might say boldly, put into words by MbZ’s best operator abroad, his ambassador to the US, Yousef al-Otaiba, recently. 

The op-ed he wrote in Israel’s Yedioth Ahronot was ostensibly to warn Israel that annexation was a bridge too far. Writing in Hebrew, Otaiba posed to a Jewish audience as a friendly Arab – “one of three Arab ambassadors in the East Room of the White House when President Trump unveiled his Middle East peace proposal in January,” he reminded them.

The UAE and Israel are an item. No need for the loving couple to hide behind the bushes

In fact, the letter was no such thing. It certainly wasn’t a message from the Palestinians themselves. The UAE has no problems with the Israeli occupation and will overtly send two planes full of personal protection equipment (PPE) to Ben Gurion airport and make any number of high- profile trade deals with Israel to reinforce their intent to normalise relations. 

The days of disguising the flight plans of aircraft from Abu Dhabi to Ben Gurion airport by making them disappear over Jordan are long gone. The UAE and Israel are an item. No need for the loving couple to hide behind the bushes. Nor was it a message from Jordan, which regards annexation of the West Bank as an existential threat to the kingdom. 

It turned out to be a message from liberal Jews in America to right-wing Jews in Israel. The mastermind of this operation was the American Israeli billionaire Haim Saban, according to a report in Axios. A former adviser to Netanyahu, Caroline Glick called the letter Saban’s brainchild.

In any case, it had little to do with Arab opinion. It did, however, contain another more important message: MbZ’s mission statement appears in two key paragraphs Otaiba wrote.

“With the region’s two most capable militaries, common concerns about terrorism and aggression, and a deep and long relationship with the United States, the UAE and Israel could form closer and more effective security cooperation. 

“As the two most advanced and diversified economies in the region, expanded business and financial ties could accelerate growth and stability across the Middle East,” Otaiba wrote.

In these sentences, UAE not only claims to have a military stronger than that of both Egypt and Saudi Arabia but, fantastically, it also claims to have the strongest and most diversified economy in the Arab world.

Those are some boasts for the crown prince of a tiny Gulf city state to make. 

“Little Sparta” has big ambitions.

Israel’s junior partner

By comparing its military reach to Israel’s, the UAE is sidelining its allies in the Saudi and Egyptian armies. But this is of little importance. Mohammed bin Zayed wants to turn his statelet into another Israel.

Both countries are small in size and population. Both are deeply militarised societies. Israel’s “citizen’s army” is well known. The draft that MbZ introduced for Emirati men in 2014 and expanded from 12 to 16 months in 2018 is less well known.

Both countries have a military and economic reach which extends far beyond their borders and into the heart of Africa. If Israel has shown it has a long arm that can reach to Entebbe and all over the world to exact revenge, so too has UAE shown its long arm in Libya, Turkey, Syria – nations far away from the Gulf. 

Both have a dynamic population that can serve Western interests.They have common enemies – Islamism, Turkey, Iran. They have a common strategy to control the region. The two largest regional challenges for the Emirates and Israel are Turkey and Iran respectively.

The Emiratis confront the Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan head-on. They funded an attempted Gulenist coup in 2016. They oppose his forces in Idlib by paying Bashar al-Assad to break the ceasefire arranged by the Russians, and the UAE confronts Turkish forces in Libya.

When unidentified bombers attacked Turkish air defence batteries in the newly recaptured Libyan airbase of Al-Watiya, Abdulkhaleq Abdulla, an advisor to the Emirati royal court, tweeted: “On behalf of all Arabs, the UAE has taught a lesson to Turks.”

There can only be one bulldog on the block and Israel has no intention of sharing that role with an Arab with ideas above his station

He deleted it afterwards.

But Israel itself stays in the background. It regards the Turkish military as its main threat. As I reported in January last year, Yossi Cohen, the head of Mossad, told a meeting of diplomats from Saudi Arabia, UAE and Egypt in a Gulf capital that Israel considered Turkey’s military to be more capable and less easily containable that Iran’s. But Israel itself does not confront Turkey.

Similarly the UAE does not confront Iran, even when tankers are mined outside an Emirati port. The kinetic stuff is done by Israel, which is believed to be responsible for a large explosion in Natanz in workshops which assemble centrifuges to enrich uranium, and possibly for up to six other mysterious explosions in Iran too.

Regionally, the UAE and Israel work in tandem, each covering the other’s back. But this does not mean that the project itself is stable or long term. Israel may indeed find it useful to play along with MbZ’s ego to serve its own interests of keeping the Palestinians under permanent occupation.

But its national interests come first.

Otaiba’s chutzpah sparked a lively reaction from Glick who wrote in Israel Hayom: “No one is doing anyone any favors. And if we’re already on the subject of favors, the stronger side in this partnership is Israel. The Israeli economy is much more robust that the oil economies of the Persian Gulf. Who does Otaiba think he’s scaring with his threats when oil is selling at $37 a barrel?”

There can only be one bulldog on the block and Israel has no intention of sharing that role with an Arab with ideas above his station.

The second problem with MbZ’s mission is his Sunni Arab allies. When the Saudis and Egyptian military elites realise that their own national and commercial interests are suffering, they will start to look at MbZ’s pyrotechnic adventures differently. 

The maritime deal that Turkey signed with the UN-backed government in Tripoli gives Egypt greater access to maritime riches than it could possibly have in a deal with Cyprus and Greece, and yet Egypt denounced the deal as illegal.

Similarly the carving up of Yemen by the UAE, which has now occupied the Yemeni island of Socotra and is backing southern separatists in Aden, is not in the interests of Riyadh, which is primarily concerned about maintaining the security along its southern border and installing a puppet regime in Sanaa.

History lessons

Israel should not be fooled by expressions of support from the UAE’s satraps, like Abdul Salam al-Badri, deputy prime minister of the eastern Libyan-based government in Tobruk, or Hani bin Breik, the vice chairman of the Southern Transitional Council in Aden, who by the way is a Salafist.

History bodes ill for MbZ’s project. Every Arab state that has worked with or recognised Israel is today weaker and more divided as a result

History bodes ill for MbZ’s project. Every Arab state that has worked with or recognised Israel is today weaker and more divided as a result. This goes for Egypt and for Jordan, both of whose diplomats, who once thought of themselves as pioneering, regret what they did in the name of peace. It proved a bitter false dawn.

The economic miracle both countries were promised at the time never materialised, the Palestinian conflict is as intractable as ever, and historic Palestine is weaker and smaller than ever before. 

Jordan, which has worked more closely with Israel than any other Arab country, is tottering on the verge of bankruptcy, mass unemployment and social breakdown. Its strategic interests in the West Bank and Jerusalem counts for nothing with the dominant settler right-wing in Israel.

Fatah, which recognised Israel, is asking itself the same questions. Why did we do it at Oslo? What was it for? That debate is bringing them closer to their rivals Hamas. 

A doomed alliance

The reality is that the dalliance between Israel and the UAE is doomed. It is the work of individuals ,not peoples. MbZ’s plots and staretegems are his own, not his nation’s.

The Arab street is implacably opposed to recognising Israel until a just solution is found for the Palestinians, a solution involving their own land and their own right of return. 

MbZ’s mission is mission impossible and the sooner his Arab allies see that, the sooner they can prevent a second decade of regional war

The MbZ-Israel project is poison for the region. it is not Israel coming to terms with its neighbours. It is making fools out of them.

Before the Syrian and Libyan civil wars, Turkey did not have an interventionist foreign policy. It has one now. Similarly, Iran’s military reach never really extended beyond the Shia minorities of the Sunni Arab states, and that is taking its military support for Hezbollah and its financial support for Hamas into account.

Iran never actually threatened Israel’s military dominance as Cohen himself acknowledged in that meeting in a Gulf state over a year ago. Iran, from Mossad’s point of view, is containable. 

MbZ’s mission is mission impossible and the sooner his Arab allies see that, the sooner they can prevent a second decade of regional war.


By David Hearst
Source: Middle East Eye

Share this:

  • Share
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Email

Like this:

Like Loading...

Filed under: Al Qaeda, Egypt, ISIS, Tunis, Turkey, War on Yemen, Yemen | Tagged: 9/11, al-Sisi, American "Muslim" Brotherhood, American democracy, Annexation of the West Bank, Civil War, Counter-Revolution, Haftar, MBS, MBZ, Mohamad Mursi, Trump, Zionist entity | Comments Off on Mohammed bin Zayed’s Mission Impossible: Alliance with Israel

أكثر من 5 آلاف مُوقّع تونسيّ.. عريضة تسأل عن ثروة الغنوشيّ؟

Posted on May 19, 2020 by martyrashrakat

البناء

تجاوزت حملة توقيعات تطالب بالتحقيق في ثروة زعيم حركة النهضة الإخوانية في تونس راشد الغنوشي، حاجز الـ5 آلاف مُوقّع، وتسعى الحملة في هدفها المقبل إلى رفع العدد إلى 7500 توقيع.

ويرتاب الناشطون في ثروة الغنوشي، لكونه لم يمارس أي نشاط مهني أو اقتصادي منذ قدومه إلى تونس قبل 9 سنوات آتياً من لندن.

وتقول العريضة إن الغنوشي أصبح من «من أغنى أغنياء تونس»، بثروة تقدر بأكثر من مليار دولار.

ودعا الموقعون على العريضة، وهم عدد من الأكاديميين والنشطاء والفنانين والمواطنين، إلى ضرورة «ﺍﻟﺘﺤﻘﻴﻖ ﺑﻜﻞ ﺟﺪﻳﺔ ﻭﺷﻔﺎﻓﻴﺔ ﻓﻲ ﺛﺮﻭﺓ ﺍﻟﻐﻨﻮﺷﻲ وﻣﺼﺎﺩﺭﻫﺎ».

كما دعوا إلى تشكيل ﻟﺠﻨﺔ ﻣﺴﺘﻘﻠﺔ للتحقيق في مصادر هذه الثروة التي تقول تقارير إنها تجاوزت المليار دولار، تتكون من الاتحاد العام التونسي للشغل ونقابة المحامين والرابطة التونسية للدفاع عن حقوق الإنسان.

وقالوا إنه «باعتبار أن السيد راشد الغنوشي هو زعيم واحد من أكبر الأحزاب تمثيلاً في البرلمان، وباعتبار أنه رئيس مجلس النواب، وباعتبار تفشي الفساد في الدولة والمجتمع، وباعتبار كثرة التمويلات الأجنبية المشبوهة التي تفد على البلاد التونسية بعنوان العمل الخيري والجمعياتي، وباعتبار تقاطع هذه التمويلات غالباً مع التنظيمات الإرهابية والأجندات السياسية المشبوهة، فإنه قد بات من الضروري أن يتم التحقيق بكل جدية وشفافية في ثروة الغنوشي وفي مصادرها».

Share this:

  • Share
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Email

Like this:

Like Loading...

Filed under: Tunis | Tagged: al-Nahda Party, Corruption, Rashid Ghannouchi | Comments Off on أكثر من 5 آلاف مُوقّع تونسيّ.. عريضة تسأل عن ثروة الغنوشيّ؟

انقلاب تركيّ على نتائج الحرب العالميّة الثانية

Posted on May 14, 2020 by martyrashrakat

د. وفيق إبراهيم

يضغط الاتراك عسكرياً وسياسياً لتحقيق المكانة المحورية بين المتصارعين للسيطرة على اعماق البحر الأبيض المتوسط وسواحل بلدانه مع بعض امتداداتها الداخلية في البر.

فما يجري أدرك مرحلة حرب ضروس بين قوى دولية من اوروبا وشرقي المتوسط وروسيا واميركا مع بعض النحيب المصريّ الشجيّ والرقص الإماراتي على حبال اميركية متينة.

مدى هذه الحرب واسع جداً لشمولها المياه الإقليمية والدولية للمتوسط في جهاته الشرقية والجنوبية فتشمل سواحل بلاد الشام في سورية ولبنان وفلسطين المحتلة ومصر الى السواحل الجنوبية في ليبيا وتونس والجزائر والمغرب وتضم أيضاً سواحل قبرص من كل جهاتها وصولاً الى اليونان.

هناك اذاً صراع مفتوح على المتوسط يأخذ شكل حرب عسكرية شرسة في ليبيا بين دولتيها المتصارعتين الغربية للسراج الموالية لتركيا والشرقية الجنوبية لحفتر المدعومة من فرنسا وإيطاليا وروسيا وألمانيا وبريطانيا، والأميركيين المكتفين بالتأييد السياسي، انما مع مواصلة الحوار مع الأتراك ورجلهم الليبي الاخواني السراج.

كما يتجسّد هذا الصراع في ارتفاع حدة التوتر بين تركيا واليونان على غاز ونفط قبرص وأعماق البحر. وهذا الموضوع محكوم باعتقاد تركي ان الأميركيين خصوصاً والغربيين عموماً بحاجة اليهم، منذ زمن الاتحاد السوفياتي، لذلك ترك الغرب تركيا تحتل الجزء المسكون من أتراك قبارصة في الجزيرة المستقلة منذ 1974.

بالمقابل تعتبر اليونان أن قبرص هي جزء من تراثها الإغريقي بالاضافة الى انتمائها القومي الى اليونان، فتتصرف اليونان وكأنها صاحبة الحق المبرم في الجزيرة وثرواتها.

لكن هذا الصراع ليس إلا الجزء البسيط من صراع عثماني – يوناني تاريخي، نجح فيه الأتراك منذ قرون عدة بالسيطرة على جزء نهائي من تركيا.

هذه الصراعات في المتوسط وليبيا تدفع نحو صراعات عالمية الطابع ومياهه الوطنية والدولية. وهذا يشمل الخلاف اللبناني مع الكيان الإسرائيلي المحتل عند الحدود البحرية في الجنوب وخلاف كامن تركي سوري على إمكانات كبيرة من الغاز والنفط في أعماق حدوديهما البحرية.

ما هي الخطة التركية؟

تشرف تركيا على مسافة طويلة من سواحل المتوسط بدءاً من حدودها البحرية مع سورية وحتى بحار اليونان، وأضافت دوراً متوسطياً لها بالسيطرة على قبرص التركية وليبيا «السراج» وتطمح من خلال العلاقة مع حزب النهضة التونسي الذي يمسك رئيسه الغنوشي برئاسة مجلس نواب بلاده. تطمح الى ضم تونس الى نفوذها. فتستطيع بذلك ان تمسك بالحدود البحرية والإقليمية لقبرص الواقعة في منتصف البحر المتوسط. وتمتد الى ليبيا براً وبحراً مع مدياتها الاقليمية، هذا بالاضافة الى ان سواحل المتوسط التركية تبيح لها التنقيب في اعماق المتوسط بين اليونان وقبرص وحتى سواحلها المباشرة، وتعتبر تركيا أنها دولة متوسطية اساسية لها كامل الحق والاولوية في التنقيب في اعماق البحر المتوسط قبالة العالم العربي من المغرب وحتى حدودها الإقليمية مع اليونان وبلغاريا، اي ما يعادل خمساً وسبعين في المئة من سواحل البحر المتوسط وبالتالي أعماقه الدولية.

هذا ما يدفع الى السؤال التالي: أين العرب من كل ذلك وأين الغرب وروسيا؟

معظم العرب في الخليج مرتبطون بالمشروع الأميركي المتريث من جهة والمشترك من جهة أخرى في الحرب عبر التورط الاماراتي في حرب ليبيا بالإسناد وبالسلاح والتمويل لقوات حفتر.

اما اوروبا فمنزعجة من الاستيلاء التركي على دولة السراج الليبية فتدعم حفتر إنما من دون السماح له بالحسم النهائي، لان المفاوضات الدولية على اقتسام المغانم في كامل البحر المتوسط لم تصل بعد الى خواتيمها، ما يتطلب تسعيراً للمعارك بدأ يظهر بالسلاح الأوروبي والإماراتي المتدفق الى بنغازي والجنوب مع قوات روسية تابعة لشركات فاغنر الى جانب دعم مصري مباشر بالخبراء والمدربين وبعض الكتائب العسكرية، بالمقابل تقف قوات تركية مع جيش السراج ومجموعات من تنظيمات سورية إرهابية وأخرى من الاخوان المسلمين. اما العرب المجاورون لليبيا، فمصر تخشى من انتصار الاخوان المسلمين الليبيين ومعها تركيا، فينعكس على وضعها في الداخل المصري، حيث لا يزال الاخوان المسلمون فيها القوة الأساسية بعد الجيش المصري. لجهة السودان فلا يزال غارقاً في خلافاته الداخلية، وتطبيق سياسات منصاعة للأميركيين تجعله من مؤيدي حفتر حيناً وصامت في معظم الاحيان.

لكن تونس يتنازعها تياران، الاول من الاخوان المسلمين يؤيد السراج الليبي والآخر من أجنحة رئيسها قيس سعيّد الذي يدعو الى الحياد.

واذا كان باستطاعة قائد الاخوان في تونس رئيس مجلس النواب الغنوشي الذي يترأس ايضاً اخوان ليبيا بجهاديين متطوعين فإن قيس سعيّد عاجز عن دعم حفتر إلا بالدعاء.

على مستوى البلدان العربية غير المجاورة، فسورية منهمكة بالتصدّي لتركيا واخوانها مع احتلال عسكري اميركي الى جانب الإرهابيين، والمغرب لم يعد يأبه للصراعات العربية. وهذا حال كامل العالم العربي الذي تجتاحه تركيا اما بالوسائل المباشرة كحال العراق وسورية وليبيا وحزب الإصلاح في اليمن وبعض اجنحة الاخوان في السودان والجزائر وتونس، وإما بالسياسة. لذلك فإن المشروع التركي يبدو واضحاً بمحاولة الاستفادة من تراجع الدور الاميركي في الشرق الأوسط وتقهقر الدور السعودي في معظم العالمين الاسلامي والعربي لإعادة العثمانية الاردوغانية الجديدة بوسيلتين: السيطرة الاستراتيجية والايديولوجية والاستيلاء على الغاز والنفط.

ألا يشكل هذا الأمر انقلاباً تركياً على نتائج الحرب العالمية الثانية؟

يعتبر الأتراك ان الاميركيين سمحوا لهم باحتلال ثلث قبرص منذ 46 عاماً. وكان هناك عدو واحد لهم هو الاتحاد السوفياتي، اما اليوم فلديهم عدوان اثنان واكثر من منافس هما الصين وروسيا والمانيا واليابان والهند، لذلك تبقى تركيا حاجة اساسية للنفوذ الاميركي العالمي، واي تخلٍ عنها يذهب نحو تدمير كبير للجيوبوليتيك الاميركي. هذا هو صميم المراهنة التركية التي تجزم بأن الاميركيين لن يعترضوا على دور كبير لها في مياه البحر الابيض المتوسط وسواحل بلدانه، لا يفعل أكثر من صد النفوذ الروسي الصيني.

فهل هذا صحيح؟

لن تقبل دول اوروبا المتوسطية في فرنسا وايطاليا بهذه المعادلة. وقد تتمكن اليونان العضو في الاتحاد الاوروبي من جذب المانيا ومعظم دول الاتحاد الى مياه البحر المتوسط للاستفادة من ثرواته، كما ان الاميركيين لن يذهبوا الى حدود إثارة غضب الاوروبيين من اجل ارضاء اردوغان، وقد يذهبون كعادتهم نحو التوفيق بين تحالفاتهم انما على اساس الاولوية للمصالح الاميركية.

يتبقى العرب وعندما يستيقظون من سباتهم تكون المعركة على ثروات المتوسط اختتمت فصولها وانتقلت للسيطرة على بحار جديدة.

Share this:

  • Share
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Email

Like this:

Like Loading...

Filed under: EU, GCC, Greece, Levant, Libya, Tunis, Turkey, USA | Tagged: American "Muslim" Brotherhood, Cyprus, Libyan National Army, Libyan war, Mediterranean Sea, Nahida, WWII | Comments Off on انقلاب تركيّ على نتائج الحرب العالميّة الثانية

Trump Plans to Keep U.S. Troops Permanently in Iraq

Posted on February 18, 2020 by martyrashrakat

by Eric Zuesse for The Saker Blog

A reliable and exceptionally knowledgeable source, who doesn’t wish to be publicly identified, has confidentially informed me that an agreement has been reached in which U.S. troops will remain permanently in Iraq but under exclusively NATO command, no longer under the command of CentCom (US Central Command in the Middle East).

On February 12th, NATO’s defense ministers agreed to increase operations in Iraq. NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg has been working ever since Fall of 2019 to prepare this plan (Trump had been pushing for it even before that), and Stoltenberg has consulted in Jordan with King Abdullah, and also in Brussels with Sabri Bachtabji, Tunisia’s Minister of Foreign Affairs, because Tunisia is a key part of Trump’s plan, to use other NATO nations as America’s proxies controlling the Middle East.

On February 1st, pro-Muslim-Brotherhood Turkey agreed to the plan, and will be transferring jihadists (al-Qaeda-affiliated groups, plus some ISIS) from Syria’s jihadist-filled Idlib Province, into Libya, via Tunisia, so as to boost the forces of Fayez al-Sarraj (former monarchist now backed by U.S., EU, and Turkey) to defeat the forces of Khalifa Haftar (former Gaddafi-supporter, now in the Libyan civil war claiming as his objective the defeat of all jihadists there). Whereas U.S., EU, and Turkey, back al-Sarraj, Russia isn’t involved in the war, except trying to negotiate peace there, but al-Sarraj rejects any involvement by Russia. Turkey’s interest in Libya is to win Libya’s backing so as to be in a stronger position to win turf in the emerging competition for rights to oil and gas under nearby parts of the Mediterranean Sea. To have Libya beholden to Turkey would be to increase the likelihood of Turkey’s getting that offshore oil.

America’s position regarding the jihadists that Turkey has been protecting in Syria’s Idlib province is that they can be useful as proxy boots-on-the-ground to defeat Haftar, whom America too opposes, favoring al-Sarraj, whom Turkey likewise backs; so, Turkey and U.S. are cooperating on this effort in Libya.

America’s interest is in overthrowing Syria’s secular Government and replacing it with one that would be acceptable to the fundamentalist-Sunni Saud family who own Saudi Arabia. In order to do this, America will therefore need to keep its forces in Iraq. Otherwise, Russia and Iran, both of which America and the Sauds hope ultimately to conquer, would have stronger influence in the Middle East, which neither America nor the Sauds want. America invaded Iraq not only directly for its international corporations to profit, but also in order to have its hundreds of bases there from which to control the entire Middle East — bases that are supplied out of the world’s largest Embassy building (from which even other U.S. embassies are supplied), which building was constructed in Baghdad after the 2003 invasion. Trump’s plan now is to bring in NATO allies, so that they will help out in the Middle East, more than in the past. Trump wants America’s vassal-nations to absorb some of the financial burdens of imposing empire, so that America’s taxpayers won’t need to fund the full cost of it, for the benefit of the billionaire owners of international corporations that are based in the United States and in its allied (or vassal) (including other NATO) countries. This is why Stoltenberg has been working, for months, to effectuate Trump’s plan.

On February 1st, the veteran Middle Eastern reporter David Hearst headlined at his Middle East Eye site, “EXCLUSIVE: US military offers Iraq a partial pullback”, and he reported that,

A representative of the US military told the Iraqis present that the United States was prepared to leave positions in or near Shia-majority areas, such as Balad Air Base, which is located 80km north of Baghdad and houses US trainers and contractors.

Washington, the Iraqis were told, could even consider reducing its presence in Baghdad.

“We are prepared to leave some of the Shia-majority areas, like the base in Balad. Maybe we could reduce our presence in Baghdad,” the military representative told his Iraqi counterparts, who understood from this that the US presence in the Iraqi capital would be reduced to guarding its embassy and the airport.

However, the US side categorically ruled out withdrawing from their biggest air base in Iraq, and indeed the whole Middle East, Ain al-Assad. …

For the US side, Ain al-Assad was its “red line”.

The representative said: “We cannot even start talking about withdrawing [from that base]. Withdrawal is out of the question.”

Such was the sensitivity of these discussions that they were held well away from Iraq. The meeting took place in the private residence of the Canadian ambassador to Jordan in Amman, Middle East Eye was told.

Present at the meeting was a representative of the US military, a Nato official and a senior Iraqi security adviser.

America needs the vast Ain al-Assad base in order ultimately to overthrow Bashar al-Assad (no relation), Syria’s secular President, who is allied with Russia and with Iran. NATO will increasingly be taking over this function of assisting the war for regime-change in Syria.

On February 15th, Middle East Monitor bannered “Iraq: Washington to strengthen presence of NATO to disengage militarily from Baghdad” and reported that America’s allies will take over there but “This will only work if the NATO mission includes a strong US component.” So: America’s withdrawal will be only nominal. This will help NATO by assuring that Trump won’t abandon NATO if he wins a second term, and it will also help Trump to win a second term by Trump’s claiming to be withdrawing from the Middle East even without actually doing any such thing.

The aim of this is to fool the public everywhere. In international affairs, this is the way to win: first, fool your own public; then, get your allies to fool theirs. That builds a “coalition.” Donald Trump is doing precisely this.

Trump is continuing Barack Obama’s wars, just like Barack Obama continued George W. Bush’s wars. The plan for America to control the Middle East remains on course, now, ever since 2001. As Obama often said, “America is the one indispensable nation.” (All others are therefore “dispensable.”) It is certainly the leading nation. And America’s aristocracy possess patience. They know that Rome wasn’t built in a day. In order to be the leading nation and the biggest international aggressor (so that “America is the one indispensable nation”), what is essential is to treat every other nation as being “dispensable” (make them fear you), so that either they will do as the leading nation wants, or else they will be dispensed with — they will become added to the list of target-nations to be conquered. They are dispensable; they are disposable. A disposable nation is aware of its subordinate position. On February 15th, the International Institute for Strategic Studies reported that

the US dedicated a significantly higher proportion of its defence budget to procurement and R&D than its NATO allies. European countries are increasing their defence investments as a share of their total spending – for those countries with available data, funds rose from 19.8% in 2018 to 23.1% in 2019 – but the equivalent category reached 29% in the US. The United States’ defence investments were thus worth around four times as much as European states’ combined.

A nation which spends 29% of its GDP on “defence” might be weak in other ways, but everyone in the world will fear it, and all other nations will know that they are “dispensable,” because the country which spends that high a percentage (and there is only one which does) also happens to have the world’s largest economy. Any other country, which isn’t one of its vassals, will be viewed by it (or by its aristocracy) as being an “enemy” — a nation that is targeted for “regime-change,” instead of for being a market. And being a targeted nation is very different than being a target market. It is to be only a target — a target of sanctions, a target of coups, and, if those fail, then a target of invasion and military occupation, like Iraq is.

(Howsever, actually, the U.S. spends only around 7% — $1.5 trillion divided by $22 trillion — of its economy toward the Pentagon and the rest of America’s military. Still, it might be the highest percentage on Earth. Because around $1 trillion yearly in U.S. military spending is off-the-books, that ‘defence’ figure could actually be closer to 10%. But it’s not 29%. Right now, around 20% of U.S. GDP goes to buy healthcare, which is the very largest percentage for healthcare of any country on the planet. America’s quality of healthcare is at or near the lowest of all industrialized nations; so, the wastage in its healthcare is even larger than in its military.)

Iraq and Iran and Syria — and every other nation that is friendly toward Russia — all of them, are targets of the U.S. regime. That’s why Trump plans to keep U.S. forces in Iraq: Iraq was conquered in 2003, and he wants it to stay that way.

—————

Investigative historian Eric Zuesse is the author, most recently, of  They’re Not Even Close: The Democratic vs. Republican Economic Records, 1910-2010, and of  CHRIST’S VENTRILOQUISTS: The Event that Created Christianity.

Share this:

  • Share
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Email

Like this:

Like Loading...

Filed under: Al Qaeda, Iran, IRAQ, ISIS, Jordan, Libya, NATO, Russia, Syria, Tunis, Turkey | Tagged: American "Muslim" Brotherhood, Haftar, Liberation of Idlib, Trump, US Withdrawal from Iraq | Comments Off on Trump Plans to Keep U.S. Troops Permanently in Iraq

Presidential advisor: Erdogan will be forced to leave Syrian territories. It is our decision and it is not up to him

Posted on September 2, 2019 by martyrashrakat

ST

Saturday, 31 August 2019 21:05

Syrian Presidential Media and Political Advisor Dr. Bouthaina Shaaban has affirmed that the announcement of the ceasefire agreement in Idleb is approved by Syria and Russia and it has nothing to do with  rapprochements between other countries.

“The decision of ceasefire in IIdleb is temporary,” she said, asserting that what has been done by terrorists in Idleb countryside is planned by countries.

She underscored that any ceasefire agreement serves the big strategy of liberating every inch in the country.

“Turkey is not serious in dealing with de-escalation zones and Erdogan will be forced to leave the Syrian territories. This is our decision and it is not up to him,” Dr. Shaaban added.

She advised those who are dealing with the US to return to the homeland.

As for the constitutional committee, the advisor stressed that no final agreement has been reached yet.

“The war on Syria comes within a world framework because of our desire to have an independent decision,” she said in an interview with the Lebanese-based al-Mayadeen TV channel.

Dr. Shaaban also pointed out that the Syrian state exerts every possible effort to meet the needs of Syrian people for oil, but we do not know the destination of Iranian oil tankers .

The advisor concluded by saying that President Bashar al-Assad’s vision about the country is that every inch of Syrian territories will be liberated.

Basma Qaddour

 بثينة شعبان : سيادة سوريا ووحدة أراضيها سيتحقق مهما كلف الثمن

المستشارة السياسية والإعلامية للرئاسة السورية بثينة شعبان تؤكد أن أي قرار لوقف إالنار يخدم الاستراتيجية الكبرى لتحرير كل شبر من الأراضي السورية، وتوضح أن قرار وقف إطلاق النار في إدلب مؤقت.

قالت المستشارة السياسية والإعلامية للرئاسة السورية بثينة شعبان إن ما فعله الارهابيون بريف إدلب من تخطيط دول.

وفي حديث مع الميادين ضمن “المسائية” أكدت شعبان أن أي قرار لوقف اطلاق النار يخدم الاستراتيجية الكبرى لتحرير كل شبر من الأراضي السورية، مشيرة إلى أن قرار وقف إطلاق النار في إدلب مؤقت.

وأوضحت أن الاتفاق الروسي التركي يؤكد على سيادة وسلامة الأراضي العربية السورية، موضحةً إلى أن الاعلان عن وقف إطلاق النار في إدلب تمّ بقرار من سوريا وروسيا ولا علاقة له بأي تفاهمات.

وردت شعبان على كلام الرئيس التركي لرجب طيب إردوغان قائلةً “المياه تكذب الغطاس”، لافتةً إلى أن لإردوغان أطماع في العراق وسوريا وله علاقات مع المجموعات الإرهابية على الأرض.

كما أشارت شعبان إلى أن الجيش التركي سوف يغادر مجبراً الأراضي السورية.

كذلك أضافت أن على هامش قمة إردوغان بوتين لم يجر لقاءات سورية تركية، موضحةً أن تركيا ليست صادقة بالتعاطي مع مناطق خفض التصعيد.

شعبان تابعت قائلةً “رؤية الرئيس السوري بشار الأسد لهذا البلد أنه سيتم تحرير كل شبر من الأراضي السورية”.

وفي حديثها أوضحت أن “من رهن قراره للأميركي في شرق الفرات ليس فقط من الكرد”، ناصحةً من يتعامل مع الأميركيين شرق الفرات أن يعودوا الى بلدهم.

كما شددت على أن سيادة سوريا ووحدة أراضيها سيتحقق مهما كلف الثمن، مضيفةً “حتى الان لا يوجد اتفاق نهائي على اللجنة الدستورية”.

كذلك أضافت شعبان أنه “لا يمكن تحقيق أي شي أو الحديث عن أي انجاز في المسار السياسي دون موافقتنا”.

في سياق متصل، قالت شعبان إن “الحرب على سوريا هو ضمن إطار عالمي سببه سعينا لاستقلالية قرارنا”.

ولفتت إلى أن زيارة بومبيو إلى المنطقة “أوقفت قرارات لاعادة فتح بعض الدول العربية سفاراتها في سوريا”، مضيفةً أن “رجال اعمال من سلطنة عمان والامارات العربية ستشارك في معرض دمشق الدولي، وسوريا سعيدة بأي مبادرة من الاردن لتحسين العلاقات وستتعامل بإيجابية”.

وحول لبنان تابعت شعبان، “لبنان بلد شقيق وصديق ونحن ولبنان بلد واحد، وسوريا عنوان وعاصمة للمقاومة ومعنية بما يجري لحزب الله في لبنان، ولا يمكن لسوريا ان تقول انها غير معنية بما يجري في العراق ولبنان، وهي جزء من محور المقاومة في المنطقة وصمود الجيش السوري ساهم بتقوية هذا المحور”، وشددت على أنه “في الحرب القادمة لن تتمكن اسرائيل من أن تقود حرباً ضد طرف واحد من محور المقاومة”.

هذا وأشارت إلى أن سوريا تحاول الحصول على حاجات شعبها من النفط لكن السلطات لا تعلم أين تتجه الناقلة الايرانية.

المستشارة الإعلامية والسياسية للرئيس الأسد تطرقت إلى ملف الانتخابات الرئاسية التونسية وقالت إن “مستقبل تونس سيكون أفضل اذا نسقت مع الدول العربية، وإن انتماء حركة النهضة في تونس هو للاخوان المسلمين وليس للعمق العربي”.

المصدر : الميادين

Related Videos

Related News

  • بثينة شعبان : سيادة سوريا ووحدة أراضيها سيتحقق مهما كلف الثمن
  • شعبان: الحرب العدوانية التي شنت على سورية تستهدف تدمير هويتها وتاريخها
  • بناة المستقبل ….بقلم د. يثينة شعبان
  • أنباء عن استقدام الجيش تعزيزات إلى جبهات ريف حلب.. بدء سريان وقف إطلاق النار شمالاً وهدوء تام وحذر في المنطقة
  • حل «النصرة» خلال ٨ أيام وفتح الطريقين الدوليين مقدمة لاستئناف «سوتشي» بشروط سورية

Share this:

  • Share
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Email

Like this:

Like Loading...

Filed under: GCC, Tunis, Turkey, USA, War on Syria | Tagged: American "Muslim" Brotherhood, Axis of Resistance, Erdogan, Liberation of Idlib, neo-Ottoman | Comments Off on Presidential advisor: Erdogan will be forced to leave Syrian territories. It is our decision and it is not up to him

تونس: سائحون صهاينة يهتفون باسم جيش الاحتلال

Posted on June 15, 2019 by martyrashrakat

يونيو 14, 2019

دان الاتحاد العام التونسي للشغل ما أسماه «استباحة أرض تونس من قبل الصهاينة وبتواطؤ من جهات سياسية وأخرى تعمل في مجال السياح»، وذلك على خلفية ما بثته قناة اسرائيلية عن زيارة «إسرائيليين» لمنزل الشهيد الفلسطيني أبو جهاد في تونس، وظهورهم وهم يهتفون باسم الكيان الصهيوني وجيش الاحتلال.

كما دان اتحاد الشغل في بيان له التصريحات الإعلامية لوزير السياحة و»محاولته التغطية على ما حدث ويحدث في مجال التطبيع السياحي بالتهرّب ومغالطة الرأي العام»، مؤكداً رفضه تبرير التطبيع بتبرير الأزمة الاقتصادية وحاجة البلاد إلى تنمية سياحتها.

وجدّد مطالبته بالتحقيق في أنشطة إحدى الشركات السياحية التي تقوم برحلات إلى الأراضي الفسطينية المحتلة بالتنسيق مع جيش الاحتلال الصهيوني، محملاً الحكومة مسؤوليتها في اتخاذ الإجراءات القانونية لمنع كل أشكال التطبيع ومحاسبة القائمين عليه مهما كان موقعهم ومكانتهم.

وعبر عن تجنّده مع المجتمع المدني والقوى الوطنية من أجل مقاومة التطبيع بشتى أشكاله ومن أجل فرض قانون يجرّم التطبيع، داعياً كافة القوى الوطنية إلى استعمال كافة النضالات السلمية لوقف «هرولة البعض إلى التطبيع».

وأكد الأمين العام المساعد بالاتحاد العام التونسي للشغل محمد علي البوغديري رفض الاتحاد بشكل قاطع التطبيع مع الكيان الصهيوني، مشدداً على أن ما جرى عار على الحكومة.

وقال إنه قد تبيّن أن «هناك تطبيعاً من قبل الحكومة مع الكيان الصهيوني للأسف، والتونسيون لن يقبلوا ذلك، معتبراً أن ما جرى يُعدّ استفزازاً».

في حين أكد عضو المكتب السياسي بحركة النضال الوطني أحمد الكحلاوي أن تقرير القناة الصهيونية عرض مشاهد من أمام منزل الشهيد محمد الزواري، معتبراً أن الهدف هو تدريج عملية التطبيع مع الكيان الصهيوني.

وكان وزير الخارجية التونسي خميس الجهيناوي نفى علمه بكامل المعطيات المتعلقة بالتقارير الإعلامية حول زيارة صهاينة إلى تونس.

من جهته، اعتبر سالم الأبيض عضو مجلس نواب الشعب عن حركة الشعب أن مرافقة رئيس الحكومة للوفد الصهيوني في تونس هو وصمة عار، مضيفاً في كلمة له في البرلمان أن الحكومة التونسية تقف صامتة أمام ما يحدث من ارتباطات لتونسيين بالكيان الصهيوني.

Related Videos

Related News

  • صحافيّة إسرائيليّة تبُثّ تقريرًا من تونس عن “حجّ” اليهود لجربة ووزير السياحة طرابلسي يستقبلهم بحرارةٍ بالغةٍ والمُرشِد يقودهم للبيت الذي اغتال فيه الموساد الشهيد أبو جهاد
  • طين ستبقى القضية المركزية
  • الكيان الصهيوني يمجد الملك حسين ويفتتح شارعاً باسمه

Share this:

  • Share
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Email

Like this:

Like Loading...

Filed under: Tunis | Tagged: "Peace with Israel", al-Nahda Party, American "Muslim" Brotherhood, AngloZionist Empire, Arab Zionists, MUSLIM ZIONISTS, Normalisation, Palestinian Resistance | Comments Off on تونس: سائحون صهاينة يهتفون باسم جيش الاحتلال

عن الجزائر… حتى ينتهي المخاض بسلام

Posted on March 13, 2019 by martyrashrakat

مارس 13, 2019

ناصر قنديل

– يحتاج أي تحليل أو موقف مما تشهده الجزائر إلى إدراك خطورة الوقوع في قياسات التشبيه بتجارب أخرى، تتجاهل فرادة الحالة الجزائرية. فالحديث عن أن دور الجزائر قد حان في تجارب الربيع العربي المقيت، يتجاهل أن التجربة الاختبارية لكل ما شهدناه من مسمّيات الربيع كان في الجزائر في ما عرفته في تسعينيات القرن الماضي من انتخابات أوصلت الجماعات الإسلامية إلى الأغلبية البرلمانية، وما تلاها من حرب ضروس نزفت خلالها الجزائر لعشر سنوات عرفت بالعشرية السوداء. والقول بأن الحال في الجزائر تكرار لما شهدته سورية أو مصر مجاف للحقيقة. فالجزائر رغم كل التشوش الذي أصاب موقفها في محطات عربية مفصلية، لم تغادر ثوابت رئيسية في الاستقلال ولا تزال دولتها على كل ما فيها من علل وفساد دولة رعاية اجتماعية، في بلد كثير الثروات، وهي في هذا نصف سورية ونصف ليبيا، لكنها من حيث الموضوع الراهن الذي فجّر الشارع وفتح ملف الأحداث، تشكل نصف مصر، فالرئيس عبد العزيز بوتفيلقة الذي يملك تاريخاً وطنياً يستحق التقدير، بات عاجزاً عن ممارسة الحكم، وترشيحه لولاية خامسة شكل استفزازاً قاسياً للشارع والنخب، خصوصاً الذين لا مخططات مسيئة لبلدهم تسيِّر تحركاتهم أو تتحكم بمواقفهم.

– الدعوات لدعم غير مشروط لحراك الشارع ليحسم الموقف ويرسم المستقبل، تتجاهل ما توفره السيولة التي يقدمها حراك الشارع مهما بلغ نبل المقاصد، ومهما كانت درجة الانضباط. وهذه السيولة تشكل هدفاً بحد ذاتها، يراد له أن يطول في ظل استعصاء مطلوب يحول دون اي حل سياسي يضمن خروجاً سلمياً من الأزمة، حتى تتكسر هيبة الدولة ومؤسساتها ويتم تحييدها من المشهد، وخصوصاً مؤسسة الجيش الوطني الجزائري، وتذبل هياكل السلطة وتتآكل، بينما يتعب الشارع المتدفق بحيوية، فيصير المجال متاحاً للتشكيلات المنظمة أن تنزل إلى الساحة بمخططاتها السياسية والأمنية، وهي تملك طول النفس وحسن التنظيم والمقدرات والدعم الخارجي وتفرض أجندتها على الجميع، وفي ظل الأهمية الاستثنائية للجزائر في أسواق النفط والغاز ومشاريع الخصخصة، قد يكون التحرر من الجغرافيا والديمغرافيا الجزائرية كأعباء، لحساب منظومة خفيفة الأثقال تمسك ملفات النفط والغاز، بعدما قالت التجربة الليبية الكثير عن القدرة على التحكم بهذه الثروات مهما اشتدّت وتسعّرت الحرب والفوضى، مقابل ترك الداخل الفقير والريفي للجماعات الإسلامية بمتشدديها ومعتدليها يتنافسون ويتحاربون.

– الخطوات التي أقدم عليها الرئيس الجزائري شكلت خطوة في اتجاه فتح الطريق لمسار سلمي للخروج من الأزمة، لكنها كما يقول الشارع الجزائري ونخبه النظيفة غير كافية، بحيث لا يقبل استبدال التجديد بالتمديد، والمطلوب خريطة طريق واضحة للانتقال إلى دستور جديد وانتخابات في ظل حكومة انتقالية موثوقة، في ظل غياب قيادات سياسية موثوقة وازنة في الشارع وقادرة على قيادته، مقابل هامشية تشكيلات المعارضة التقليدية بإسلامييها وعلمانييها في لحظات التأجج الشعبي الذي يصعب الرهان على دوامه، كما تقول التجارب، وهو ما لا يجب أن يُحرجنا بالقول إن الجيش لا يزال يشكل الجهة الأشد موثوقية لتحقيق هذا الغرض الانتقالي، برعاية الحكومة التي تتولّى صلاحيات الرئاسة لزمن محدود، مع تحويل الندوة الوطنية إلى جمعية تأسيسية تحلّ مكان البرلمان وتضمّ أبرز قواه، بالإضافة إلى رموز الحراك وقادة الأحزاب، لتخرج بدستور يتناسب مع غياب القيادات التاريخية، وبالتالي ينتقل من النظام الرئاسي إلى النظام البرلماني الذي يتيح قراراً جماعياً للدولة، عبر حكومات وحدة وطنية تتمثل فيها التكتلات بحجم وزنها النيابي، وتمنع التسلط على الحكم عبر شخصيات مموّهة، تضيع معها ثوابت الجزائر والتزاماتها في مجال الأمن القومي، وهكذا تحفظ للجيش مكانته ودوره، وهذا ما يحول دون وقوع الجزائر في النتيجتين المصرية والتونسية بوجههما الأخواني أو بالعودة للنظام القديم بحلة جديدة، أو ذهابها للمسار الليبي. وفي كل الأحوال الجزائر لن تكون سورية، ليس لأنها ليست بأهميتها، بل لأن الكتلة الشعبية الوازنة والغالبة في سورية بقيت وراء مشروع الدولة ورئيسها ولأن ليس في الجزائر قائد تاريخي صاعد يمثل وجدانها الوطني والقومي قادر على قيادتها كالرئيس بشار الأسد.

– لأننا نحبّ الجزائر لا نستطيع أن نقف بلا شروط وراء الحكم أو الشارع، بل نقف بقوة مع مسار سياسي سلمي ينهي الأزمة بسلاسة ويحفظ ثوابتها، لأننا ضنينون ببلد الثورة العظيمة، ونريد أن نشهد ضماناً يحول دون أن تضيع منا الجزائر.

Related Videos

Related Articles

  • بوتفليقة «يتنحّى» ويبقى رئيساً!
  • موسكو: أحداث الجزائر شأن داخلي
  • الرئاسة الجزائرية وأفق المرحلة الجديدة
  • جدل حول «الفترة الانتقالية»: الشارع يرفض تمديد «الرابعة»
  • الحراك الجزائري ومآلاته إلى أين؟
  • الجزائر بخير..

Share this:

  • Share
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Email

Like this:

Like Loading...

Filed under: Algeria, Bloody Gas, Bloody Oil, Libya, Syria, Takfiris, Tunis, USA | Tagged: "Arab Spring", Algeria, American "Muslim" Brotherhood, AngloZionist Empire, Arab world, Arab Zionists, Bouteflika, Creative Chaos, Libya, Protests | Comments Off on عن الجزائر… حتى ينتهي المخاض بسلام

Tunisians Storm against Bin Salman’s Visit: Get out, O’ Murderer!

Posted on November 27, 2018 by martyrashrakat

November 27, 2018

The Tunisian crowds protested in Central Tunis on Tuesday heavily and angrily against the Saudi crown prince Mohamad bin Salman’s visit, denouncing his role in the aggression on Yemen, attempt to eradicate the Palestinian cause, murder of the journalist Jamal Khashoggi and persecution of local activists.

Al-Manar correspondent reported that Bin Salman who, had arrived earlier, would leave Tunisia in few hours, adding that Arab and foreign media outlets were banned from covering up his visit.

The protestors chanted slogans against Bin Salman’s visit, calling on him to leave their country and holding saws in reference to his role in harshly murdering and dismembering Khashoggi.

Source: Al-Manar English Website

Tunisians Say ‘No’ to MBS: Photos

Dozens of protesters rallied in central Tunis on Monday to decry Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman’s scheduled visit.

Prince Mohammed, commonly known by his initials MBS, is expected to arrive in Tunisia on Tuesday afternoon as part of a regional tour as he makes his way to the G20 summit set to take place in Argentina at the end of the month.

It is also MBS’s first overseas tour after the killing of Washington Post columnist Jamal Khashoggi in the Saudi consulate in Istanbul two months ago. The murder – widely seen as orchestrated by the crown prince – created an international firestorm against Saudi Arabia that continues to reverberate.

Holding several banners, Crowds were acting out the war on Yemen where a Saudi-Emirati led war against Yemen.

Image result for ‘No’ to MBS: Photos

الاحتجاجات في دول المغرب العربي على زيارة بن سلمان مستمرة

 

Source: Agencies

Related Videos

Related Articles

  • ابن سلمان يغادر تونس بعد اجتماعه بالسبسي
  • تواصل الاحتجاجات الرافضة لزيارة ابن سلمان في تونس
  • “لا أهلاً ولا مرحباً” بولي العهد السعودي في مصر
  • هل سيلتقي ترامب وإبن سلمان في قمة العشرين؟
  • الميادين مباشر | حشود جماهيرية في شارع الحبيب بورقيبة وسط تونس رفضاً لزي

Share this:

  • Share
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Email

Like this:

Like Loading...

Filed under: House of Saud, Tunis, UAE, USA, War on Yemen | Tagged: Egypt Zionists, Khashoggi's Killing, MBS, Trump | Comments Off on Tunisians Storm against Bin Salman’s Visit: Get out, O’ Murderer!

The Arab Spring: Restoration, Repression & Regime Change

Posted on January 24, 2018 by uprootedpalestinians
The Arab Spring: Restoration, Repression & Regime Change

FINIAN CUNNINGHAM | 22.01.2018 | WORLD / MIDDLE EAST

The Arab Spring: Restoration, Repression & Regime Change

The outbreak of mass protests in Tunisia this week comes on the seventh anniversary of the Arab Spring uprisings in 2011. This week, seven years ago, saw Tunisia’s strongman ruler Ben Ali fleeing for exile to Saudi Arabia. Before the month was out, Egypt’s longtime ruler Hosni Mubarak was also ousted. Back then, revolution was in the air and the region was convulsed with potential change. In many ways, arguably, it still is.

Seven years on it is appropriate that social protests have reemerged in Tunisia. That demonstrates the Arab Spring is still unfinished business. The potential change for full democracy did not occur back then, nor since. At least, not yet.

Tunisia was the first country where the uprisings in 2011 kicked off after a young street vendor named Mohamed Bouazizi self-immolated in protest against poverty and state corruption. Today, protesters in Tunisia are still calling for liberation from political and economic oppression.

So, we may ask, what happened the Arab Spring and its promise for sweeping progressive change?

Before we review the momentous events, a note of clarification is needed. Back in the heyday of the Arab Spring some analysts posited that the social movements were part of a grand plan orchestrated by Washington to clear out despots who had passed their sell-by dates.

Authors like Michel Chossudovsky and William Engdahl were among those claiming a hidden hand from Washington as part of grand scheme. They point to communications between the State Department and certain protester groups, like the April 6 youth movement in Egypt, as evidence of a master-scheme manipulated from Washington. In that view, the Arab Spring was just another version of so-called Color Revolutions, which Washington did indeed orchestrate in other parts of the world, like Georgia and Ukraine in the early 2000s.

This author disagrees on what was the motive force behind the Arab Spring events. Admittedly, Washington did have a hand in the events, but more often this was reactionary, to curtail and divert the mass uprisings – uprisings which in this author’s observations were genuine popular revolts against the US and European-backed status quo serving international capital.

Instead of successful revolution, what happened the Arab Spring were three categories of reaction. Here we look at seven countries in the region to illustrate.

Restoration

Tunisians and Egyptians may have seen the backs of Ben Ali and Mubarak, but seven years on it is evident that the ruling system which both these strongmen oversaw has been restored. In Tunisia, the Nidaa Tounes party which Ben Ali patronized is in power as part of a coalition with the Nahda Islamist party. The ruling structure of crony capitalism remains in place. The government’s signing up to an IMF loan last year for $2.9 billion is conditioned on imposing harsh economic austerity cuts on the majority working-class population. The rule of international capital has thus been restored.

In Egypt, the Mubarak regime was restored through in July 2013. El-Sisi was a senior military holdover from Mubarak’s 30-year de facto dictatorship. Admittedly, Morsi’s ascent to power after Mubarak did not represent a pluralist democratic revolution. Morsi was beholden to the Muslim Brotherhood and his short-lived rule was associated with disturbing sectarian hostility. His government alienated secular Egyptian workers. Nevertheless, el-Sisi’s violent overthrow of Morsi can be seen as a reactionary restoration of the old regime. Like Tunisia, today Egypt resembles much of the status quo as before the 2011 uprisings.

Repression

Three countries illustrating this category are Saudi Arabia, Bahrain and Yemen. There were similar developments in other countries, such as Jordan, Oman, Morocco, but on a smaller scale.

After Ben Ali and Mubarak fled from power, the Arab Spring wave soon buffeted Saudi Arabia, Bahrain and Yemen. Like Tunisia and Egypt, those three countries were ruled by US-backed despots. If the whole regional ferment was somehow a devious plot to renovate the status quo by Washington, as some authors contended, then why didn’t the despots in Saudi Arabia and Bahrain succumb to the State Department’s “human rights” proxies?

This author was in Bahrain when its protests erupted on February 14, 2011. For almost one month, the Al Khalifa monarchial regime was reeling from mortal insecurity.

The protests were mainly led by the majority Shia population against the Sunni self-styled king. Their demands, as far as this author observed, were for a worker-dedicated democracy, not a sectarian Islamic-style revolution. Bahrain’s protests were brutally repressed with the invasion of Saudi troops in mid-March 2011. The Saudi repression had the full backing of the US and Britain since the island state was and is a key military base for those two powers in the geo-strategic Persian Gulf.

Similar protests were unleashed in Saudi Arabia, particularly in the oil kingdom’s Eastern Province where the mainly Shia population have been historically marginalized by the hardline Sunni House of Saud. The protests in Bahrain and Saudi Arabia continue to this day. But Washington and London, along with Western media indifference, have given political cover for the ongoing repression of these protests.

In Yemen, the story is slightly different, in that the protest movement emerging in 2011 actually succeeded in ousting the US-backed regime of Ali Abdullah Saleh in 2012. Saleh was sidelined in a stitch-up deal overseen by the US and the Saudis to be replaced by his deputy, Abdrabbuh Mansour Hadi. The latter was prescribed as a “transition president” but ended up delaying the handover of democratic power that the Yemeni people had demanded in 2011.

No doubt that was part of the cynical US plan to restore the old order. However, the Houthi rebels grew tired of the charade and ousted the lingering Hadi by force of arms in September 2014. The US-backed Saudi war on Yemen that started in March 2015 has ever since been aimed at repressing the Yemeni uprising in order to restore their puppet Hadi.

Regime Change

Libya and Syria represent a very different category of reaction – namely, an opportunistic regime change carried out by Washington, its European NATO allies and regional client regimes. In mid-March 2011, the US, Britain and France exploited a UN Security Council resolution under the pretext of “protecting human rights” to launch a seven-month aerial bombing campaign on Libya. That war crime resulted in the overthrow of Muammar Gaddafi and his murder at the hands of NATO-backed jihadists. Gaddafi had always been an object for Western imperialist hostility. Under the cover of Arab Spring popular revolts, the US and its allies got their chance for regime change in Libya. But seven years on, the regime change has proven to be disastrous for the people of Libya, turning the once socially developed country into a failed state of jihadist-warlord chaos. Cruel poetic justice is that Libya has haunted Europe ever since with a migration crisis owing to NATO’s criminal sabotage of that country and turning the failed state into a gateway for millions of migrants from the African continent.

In Syria, minor protests in mid-March 2011 were hijacked by US and European-backed provocateurs similar to Libya which then turned into a full-blown war. As many as 500,000 people were killed in the nearly seven-year war which was waged by the US, Britain, France, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Israel and Turkey sponsoring jihadist mercenaries, who gravitated to Syria from dozens of countries around the world. The US-led regime-change plot to oust President Bashar Al-Assad failed mainly because Russia, Iran and Lebanon’s Hezbollah intervened with military support for the Syrian state.

However, the announcement this past week by US Secretary of State Rex Tillerson that American military forces are to expand their presence in Syria shows clearly that Washington’s audacious and criminal regime-change agenda persists.

Conclusion

The Arab Spring events in early 2011 were momentous. But seven years on, the progressive promise of the uprisings has yet to materialize. The recurrence of social protests in Tunisia this week is testament to the unfulfilled promise of democratic liberation for the mass of working people in that country and the wider region. The US and Europe had, and continue to have, a vested interest in maintaining the anti-democratic status quo in most of the region. The custodians of international capital managed to stymie revolution by a combination of restoration and repression. In Libya and Syria, the Western powers used the cover of the Arab Spring for opportunistic regime change with horrendous consequences.

Seven years on, the Arab Spring may seem to have been buried as a genuine popular revolutionary movement. But wherever the mass of people are oppressed by an oligarchic elite, hope for liberation will always spring eternal and is always a potential threat to the oppressors.

The Western powers may have partially succeeded in “managing” the Arab Spring. But the potential for revolt against the Western-backed capitalist order has not gone away. That potential is always there, even for an American or European Spring.

Comment

Readers are advised to check the the following posts, posted in 2012, exposing sectarian”Muslim” Brotherhood who hijacked the so-called “Arab Spring” missed a great chance to turn Arab’s people uprising into a second Arab Islamic revolution against the real ENEMY (Anglozionist Empire), because they thought to govern they have to please the Empire.

  • Rats desert a sinking ship, fools ride January 15, 2012
  • “Is it a pre-condition to recognize Israel in order to govern?” January 8, 2012

The events of the last five years have proved that I was right and on the right track. Moreover, old reader may remember my dispute with brother Daniel Mabsout on Syria, Egypt and the war on terror. Please also check:

  • THE MIND MAZE OF DANIEL MABSOUT February 7, 2014

Other Related Posts

  • O Hamas guys …Hamas needs a revolution .. March 26, 2013
  • How to unite muslims?? Two ways to stop the “Shiite tsunami”?? February 18, 2013
  • Khalid Amayereh calling for “UNITY”??  June 3, 2012Devide to Rule: “Arab Spring” between Secularism and sectarianism. December 3, 2011
  • Biden prescription for winning wars without losing a single life. (Making new Bin Ladens) November 4, 2011
  • Exclusive: Gordaffi at Gaddafi’s Capture and the “next mission” November 4, 2011

Share this:

  • Share
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Email

Like this:

Like Loading...

Filed under: Bahrain, Dictatorship, Egypt, Europe, GCC, Hezbollah, House of Saud, Iran, Libya, Russia, Syria Assad, Tunis, UK, USA, War on Iraq, War on Syria, Yemen | Tagged: "Arab Spring", al-Sisi, American "Muslim" Brotherhood, AngloZionist Empire, Color Revolutions, Creative Chaos, Finian Cunningham, Libya, regime change, Wars for Israel, Zionist entity | Comments Off on The Arab Spring: Restoration, Repression & Regime Change

The Five Seas Region: President Assad’s vision, the West and the And the camouflaged ِArab uprisings – منطقة البحار الخمسة: رؤية الرئيس الآسد، الغرب والحراك العربي المرقط

Posted on August 25, 2017 by uprootedpalestinians

 أنيس النقاش في اللقاء السياسي : التحولات السياسية في العالم الإسلامي

Published on Feb 10, 2016

–

التحولات الإستراتيجيه ف المنطقه

Published 2010 – Almanar 1 of 4

Published 2010

–

العالم في نهاية العقد الأول

ANB 1 of 5

–

الثورة العربية .. وجهة نظر وأبعاد أخرى .. أنيس النقاش

Related Articles

  • خيبة أردوغان .. سقوط العثمانية وانتصار البحار الخمسة .. بقلم: ناصر قنديل
  • نظرية “الأسد” في “تشبيك البحار الخمسة” سيضعها الانتصار على سكة التطبيق: محفوظ علي
  • “البحار الخمسة”.. رؤية الرئيس الأسد التي أرعبت الغرب
  • نظرية تشبيك البحار الخمسة … كبديل مشرقي
  • استراتيجية ربط البحار الخمسة
  • واحة الفرات… البحار الخمسة مستقبل المنطقة بلا إسرائيل 
  • سوريا: «ربط البحار الخمسة».. ومستحيلات السياسة
  • من ربط البحار الخمسة.. إلى ربط الدول الخمس
  • سورية الغد – ربط البحار الخمسة .. أفاق تنتظر الانتقال للتنفيذ
  • الرئيس البلغاري: رؤية الرئيس الأسد لربط البحار الخمسة أكثر من ملحة

Share this:

  • Share
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Email

Like this:

Like Loading...

Filed under: Al Qaeda, Egypt, Libya, Tunis, US Foreign Policy, USA, War on Syria, Yemen | Tagged: "Arab Spring", AngloZionist Empire, Anis naqash, Color Revolutions, Creative Chaos, ISIL, Libya, March 14 Movement, regime change, Syrian opposition, The 5 Seas Region, Zionist entity | Comments Off on The Five Seas Region: President Assad’s vision, the West and the And the camouflaged ِArab uprisings – منطقة البحار الخمسة: رؤية الرئيس الآسد، الغرب والحراك العربي المرقط

Who Killed theTunisian singer Thekra?

Posted on June 30, 2017 by martyrashrakat

Who dare to Say مين يجرا يقول

Her Last Song Tells

 

Singer killed because she made a song against Saudi Arabia kingdom and the political system in KSA

Thikra’s family accuses Jamal Mubarak of her murder

Family of the late Tunisian singer Thikra has exploded a bomb stating that they possess solid evidence proving that Jamal Mubarak, son of ousted Egyptian President Husni Mubarak, is involved in her murder.

Tawfiq Al Dali, Thikra’s brother, has made a call out to all those that have any information about Thikra’s murder to come forward. Forensic reports have shown that Ayman Al Suwaidi, Thikra’s husband and who is accused of killing her while being intoxicated, suffers from stomach problems and therefore was not drunk during the time the murder happened.

Thikra’s family doubts her husband shot her and then committed suicide, but rather strongly believes Jamal Mubarak had a strong hand in the murder of both. The family assured that it holds vital evidence that the former overthrown Tunisian and Egyptian governments fabricated evidence and placed the blame on her husband.

It is said that there was a relationship between Thikra and Jamal. Thikra’s family has called on all members of the press and lawyers from Tunisia and Egypt to help in uncovering all the fact. In addition, Thikra’s family has released phone numbers, emails, and created a page on the social network Facebook for people with information to contact them.

Related Videos

Share this:

  • Share
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Email

Like this:

Like Loading...

Filed under: House of Saud, Oh Mohammad, Tunis, USA, Wahabism At Work, War on Iraq | Tagged: AngloZionist Empire, Arab regimes, Arab Zionists, Mecca, Mubarak, MUSLIM ZIONISTS, Zionist entity | Comments Off on Who Killed theTunisian singer Thekra?

هيثم المناع في حافظ الاسد: انت الاعظم Haitham al-Mana on Hafiz al-Asad: You are the greatest

Posted on June 12, 2017 by martyrashrakat

تونس – الاخبارية – عالمية – عرب – متابعات الاخبارية

في مقال مزلزل , تجدونه في الرابط اسفل المقال , بمناسبة ذكرى رحيل الرئيس السابق حافظ الاسد اعلن القيادي السوري المعارض والحقوقي هيثم المناع عن خيبة امله من الثورة الحادثة في بلاده. وعبر عن تحسره لوقوعها اصلا مؤكدا ان خيارات الرئيس الراحل الذي وصفه ب“الاعظم” هي الاعمق والانسب في ادارة الشان السوري ( مقال هيثم المناع)… ولئن لم يكن ما صرح به هيثم المناع جديدا من حيث السخط على ما وصلت اليه الاوضاع في سوريا والتعبير عن الخيبة من ثورة علق عليها العديدون امالا كثيرة ,والتأكيد على ان نظريات الديمقراطية وحقوق الانسان بالمفهوم الغربي لا تتناسب مع الحالة الراهنة للمجتمعات العربية التي ما زالت تحتاج الى انساق الزعامة والمستبد المستنير العادل …مع ان مثل هذا الموقف من الشائع المألوف عند فئات عديدة عربية وغير عربية , فان اهمية ما قاله المناع تتأتى من الجوانب التالية

اولا هو مثقف عربي درس الطب وعلوم الاجتماع ومتحصل على الدكتوراه في الانتروبولوجيا , كما الف العديد من الكتب والدراسات واشتغل مع عدة مؤسسات عالمية لحقوق الانسان والمجتمع المدني …وبالتالي فهو منطقيا يستند في نظرته وتقييمه للاشياء الى تجربة قيمة و كفاءة بحثية وعمق اكاديمي لا يستهان به

ثانيا انه احد القياديين السياسيين المشرفين على الثورة السورية , انخرط عن قرب في مطابخها الداخلية واطلع على خوافيها وما يدور حولها لا سيما وهو الذي تقلد خطة رئيس هيئة الانفاذ المعارضة .

ثالثا , وهذا هام جدا حسب عديد المتابعين , وهو ان ما قاله هيثم المناع لا ينطبق على الحالة السورية فحسب , بل يستقيم مع اكثر من وضع من اوضاع ثورات بلدان الربيع العربي على غرار الحالتين الليبية واليمنية تحديدا ثم الحالة التونسية الاقل هلاكا نسبيا رغم تعثرها الواضح..

لاشك ان العناصر السالفة الذكر تجعل مما كتبه هيثم المناع (وهو صديق مقرب للمنصف المرزوقي) اكثر من مجرد ردة فعل غاضبة , او مزاج متعكر من الثورات وارتداداتها..لان القيمة العلمية والاعتبارية للرجل لا تسمح له بذلك ..وهو اكثر مما يردده العوام في السر وفي الجهر..فيفهم منه اذن محاولة اولى من نوعها لنقد ذاتي , لا شك انه سيهز النخب القاعدة التي تقف عليها النخب الفكرية والسياسية الجديدة في بلاد ما يسمى ب”الربيع العربي”

اضغط على الرابط :

(انقلاب ب180 درجة) – شاهد ماذا كتب ابرز معارض سوري في الاسد :”انت الاعظم”

تونس-الاخبارية-عرب-نزاعات-رصد

كتب د. هيثم المناع احد ابرز معارضي النظام السوري و رئيس هيئة الانفاذ المعارضة بذكرى رحيل حافظ الأسد النص التالي

img
 رسالة إلى حافظ الأسد من كاره للنظام

بعد كل ما جرى .. وبعد التعرف على شعبي السوري .. وعلى مثقفيه وفئاته وحدود تفكيرها..أقر أنا الكاره السابق للنظام.. و الهارب من الخوف والذل.. والعائد إليه لاحقا بإرادتي.. أن حافظ الأسد أعظم رجل في التاريخ السوري..فهو أفهم من الأدباء والمثقفين بأنفسهم.. أدرى من المتدينين بربهم وأعلم من الخونة… والقتلة بما في صدورهم.

حافظ الأسد عرف السوريين جيدا.. وعرف أفضل طريقة ممكنة لسياستهم ..فحاسب كلا كما يستحق تماما بحسب أثره في المجتمع دون أدنى ظلم..عرف كيف يرضي المتدينين ويضحك على عقولهم ويكسبهم..أجبر الدين أن يبقى حيث يجب أن يبقى.. في البيت والجامع..فلا يخرج إلى الحياة السياسية.. وأشرك بالمقابل كل الطوائف في الحكم

طهر الأرض من المجرمين والقتلة.. وجفف منابعهم الطائفية بالقوة..وكسب البيئات الدينية المعتدلة التي تسمح لغيرها بالحياة..و إندمج فيها فأحبته من قلبها وأغلبها لا تزال مخلصة له حتى الآن

لم أكن عرف ما هي الطائفية على أيامه و قضيت أغلب سني عمري لا أجرؤ على التلفظ بأسماء الطوائف حتى بيني وبين نفسي..كم كان ذلك جميلا .. أن يقمع رجل عظيم الشر الكامن فينا حتى قبل أن ينبت

عرف نوعية المثقفين لديه.. فعامل كل منهم كما يستحق..إحترم بعضهم وقال له أفكارك لا تنفع هنا فاص

مت أو ارحل وعد متى شئت..مثل نزار قباني والماغوط وممدوح عدوان وأدونيس..ومن لم يفهم أو كان حالما وربما كان سيستسبب بالبلبلة فقد جنى على نفسه وسجن حتى لو كان من طائفته فلا فرق عند هذا الرجل العادل.. مثل عارف دليلة وعبد العزيز الخير و مئات أخرين

ميز المثقفين الطائفيين والحاقدين المخربين للمجتمع كما أثبت الزمن اللاحق فسجنهم..و  إن لم يكونوا قد استحقوا سجنهم وقتها -و لا أعتقد – فقد استحقوه بجدارة لاحقا..مثل ياسين الحج صالح وميشيل كيلو وحازم نهار وفايز سارة ولؤي حسين وأمثالهم

طوع المثقفين الدنيئين الذين يبحثون عن مستأجر..ووجد لهم عملا يتعيشون منه طالما هم تحت الحذاء..حيث مكانهم المستحق.. مثل حكم البابا وعلي فرزات وأمثالهم

إهتم بالفنانين والشعراء السوريين والعرب الذين يستحقون الاهتمام ..مثل مصطفى نصري والجواهري والرحباني. وغيرهم

حصر الدعارة في أماكن مخصصة لها بدل أن تنتشر في الشوارع والمقاهي وأماكن العمل والصحف

عرف كيف يستقر الحكم ويتوازن دون مشاكل .. استعمل الوطني كالشرع ..والوطنيين المؤلفة قلوبهم..أي من يحتاج للمال حتى يبقوا وطنيين كخدام والزعبي وأمثالهم

أطعم الفاسدين بميزان دقيق.. وصرامة.. فكانوا لا يجرؤون على القضم أكثر مما يسمح لهم..أرضى التجار والعائلات الكبيرة

كان رجلا ترتعد له فرائص أعدائه وأصدقائه في الداخل والخارج.. فحكم أطول مدة في التاريخ السوري الحديث

كان حافظ الأسد الحل الأمثل لسورية مع الأخذ بعين الاعتبار طبيعة الشعب وثقافته وظروف البلد والأخطار المحيطة به..فبنى سورية الأمن والأمان..سورية المنيعة في مواجهة أعدائها.. سورية المدارس والمستشفيات المجانية .. سورية السلع المدعومة ..سورية الفقر الموزع بالتساوي بين الجميع.. ولو كان الغنى ممكنا لوزعه بالتساوي..عاش بسيطا فقيرا.. ومات فقيرا لا يملك شيئا..

كان رجال دولته يتمتعون بالنساء والمال والاستجمام في أجمل مناطق العالم وهو يعيش في شقته المتواضعة.. لا يفكر إلا بمصلحة الشعب.

عرف كيف يضع حذائه في فم إسرائيل والغرب وأعوانهم ملك الأردن وعرب البعير والميليشيات اللبنانية..

عادى عرفات والسادات وكل من فرط بشبر من أرض فلسطين

ضبط الميليشيات الفلسطينية بالقوة و بنى مقاومة لبنانية و دعم الفلسطينية ووجهما تجاه العدو و بنى توازن رعب يعمل الأعداء وعملاؤهم في الدخل والخارج منذ سنوات على تفكيكهما..

بنى لسورية قيمة أكبر من مساحتها وقدراتها قبل أن ينقض عليها أعداؤه بعد مماته لاعنين روحه

فعل كل ذلك باللين والحب عندما كان ينفع.. وبالشدة والبطش تارة أخرى

لا يزال كارهوه يخشونه حتى الآن..لن يستطيعوا هزيمته في رؤوسهم.. ومهما حدث سيبقى ذلا أبديا لهم.. لن يستطيعوا تجاوزه..

كثير كثير .. لا مجال يتسع لتعداد مناقب هذا العظيم العظيم..كان رجل دولة من أرفع طراز.. لا يتكرر إلا كل بضعة قرون

أقول هذا.. أنا مناصر الإنسانية والحريات وحقوق الإنسان..بعد تجربتي مع شعبي السوري ومثقفيه وموالاته ومعارضته..لاقتناعي أن سياسة حافظ الأسد هي السياسة الأمثل التي تخفف الألم السوري الكلي إلى حده الأدنى..والدليل ما يحدث الآن

وأعلن أني مستعد للعيش في سورية تحت حكم رجل مثله بغض النظر عن طائفته طالما أنه على عهده لا يجوع فقير ولا يجرؤ أحد على استباحة دم أحد .. ولا تستطيع الكلاب أن تفلت في الشوارع

تعلم أنك ولدت في المكان الخطأ والزمن الخطأ بين الناس الخطأ.. عش بسلام كما يليق بك بين الانبياء

هيثم مناع

Related Videos

Related Articles

  • President Hafez Assad’s Last Address to Parliament
  • سورية الأسد Updated
  • في الذكرى السابعة عشرة لرحيله
  • في يوم من أيام حافظ الأسد

Share this:

  • Share
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Email

Like this:

Like Loading...

Filed under: GCC, Libya, Palestine, Syria Assad, Tunis, USA, War on Syria, Yemen | Tagged: "Arab Spring", "Friends of Syria", AngloZionist Empire, Arafat, Fateh, Khaddam, Libya, Sadat, Syrian opposition | Comments Off on هيثم المناع في حافظ الاسد: انت الاعظم Haitham al-Mana on Hafiz al-Asad: You are the greatest

Islamic State Eyes North Africa: Hot Issue on Global Agenda

Posted on April 11, 2017 by martyrashrakat
Islamic State Eyes North Africa: Hot Issue on Global Agenda
PETER KORZUN | 10.04.2017 | WORLD

Islamic State Eyes North Africa: Hot Issue on Global Agenda

The Islamic State (IS) fighters are trying to flee Mosul. No doubt, the US-supported Iraqi forces will establish control over the city pretty soon. At first, IS militants will leave Iraq for the province of Deir-ez-Zor, Syria, to intensify fighting there. But with Syria no longer a safe haven, they’ll have to move elsewhere looking for weak points, like the countries of Maghreb.

Roughly, 8-11 thousand jihadi fighters come from Maghreb countries. The numbers vary according to different estimates. Some of the militants will lose lives on the battlefield, some will lay down their arms, but a large part will continue the efforts to reach the coveted goal of establishing a caliphate. With the battle experience received in Syria and Iraq, these seasoned fighters will pose a great threat to the stability of their respective homelands.

It has already started. Algeria faces a security challenge. The war against jihadism has turned Algeria into one of Africa’s top military powerhouses. In the past 20 years, Algeria has spent more on its military than all three of its immediate neighbors — Mo­rocco, Libya and Tunisia — com­bined.

Algeria is a country with a 1,200 km coastline. If waves of asylum seekers hit Europe from there, the Old Continent will be in real trouble. Besides, the country is a key supplier of oil and gas to the West. The implications of internal conflict in Algeria could be a real nightmare. Russia helps to prevent it and, thus, save Western Europe.

At least 6 thousand of IS fighters are Tunisians. Some of them hold prominent positions in the IS and the Nusra Front (Jabhat Fatah al-Sham) in Syria. Many Tunisian extremists are affiliated with Al Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb, which is active in a half-dozen countries across North Africa. Tunisia is at odds over what to do if and when they come home. These fighters would have the capabilities and cultural familiarity to potentially create a formidable and sustained destabilizing force in Tunisia. Meanwhile, Tunisian security forces break up one IS recruiting cell after another.

Algeria, Tunisia and Morocco face threats from the East as well as from the South, where they have to counter the emerging «Sahara-Sahel Front». Islamists from Mali, Niger and Mauritania are regrouping to expand the zone of influence. For instance, Al-Qaeda militants have recently attacked a Malian army post near the border of Burkina Faso.

In North and West Africa, Al Qaeda is on the rise again. Al-Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb (AQIM) has withstood the chokehold of the Algerian security services, US drones, and the French-led intervention in Mali, to launch a range of attacks in recent years, whether storming a beach resort in Ivory Coast or conducting a low-level insurgency in northern Mali.

A number of terrorist groups operating in Mali and neighboring areas – Ansar Dine, al-Mourabitoun, the Massina Brigades, the Sahara Emirate – united this February into one organization called Nusrat-ul-Islam. The newly formed group pledged allegiance to Taliban leader Mullah Haibatullah, al-Qaida leader Ayman Al-Zawahiri and the leader of al-Qaida’s North African franchise Abu Musab Abdul Wadud.

Al-Qaeda and its affiliates are challenged by the IS. In November 2016, the Islamic State in Greater Sahara was formed, led by Adnan Abu Walid al-Sahrawi.

The IS militants may regroup in the war-torn Libya. This country is probably the weakest link among Maghreb states. Defense officials have said the hardline Sunni Muslim militants are considering moving their headquarters to that country. A US military intervention is an option. According to Gen. Thomas D. Waldhauser, head of the Pentagon’s Africa Command, «The instability in Libya and North Africa may be the most significant near-term threat to U.S. and allies’ interests on the continent». Russia has been asked to intervene by Libyan political and military leaders.

The armed forces of Maghreb countries are getting prepared. The Moroccan military has just held exercises Flintlock-2017 with the US. Weapons systems, like, for instance, Russian Mi-28N Night Hunter attack helicopters, are procured to make the counterterrorist operations more effective. On March 15th, 2016, King Mohamed VI visited Moscow to sign several important agreements, including the agreement on mutual protection of classified information on military and military-technical matters and the declaration on the fight against international terrorism. Morocco is interested in strengthening its military capabilities with Russian weapons.

Last year, Russia provided Algerian and Tunisian authorities with intelligence and military aid to strengthen counterterrorism efforts. The package included Russian high-resolution satellite imagery of key Algerian border crossings with Tunisia, Libya, Chad and Mali. The imagery has enabled Algerian authorities to thwart several attempts by terrorists and insurgents to infiltrate Algerian borders. Algeria has shared this data with Tunisia.

Russia has close military cooperation with the states of the region. A country with a significant Muslim minority, about 10% of its popula­tion, it has been battling jihadists in the Caucasus for a number of years. It understands the problem and has vast experience to share. Unlike the US and other Western powers, Russia does not accompany its aid with lectures about human rights or political demands pushing for «democra­tic reforms». As Rus­sian armaments have proven themselves on the battlefield, it seems likely that Maghreb governments under terrorist threat will increasingly turn towards Moscow.

Today, Islamists of all kinds, especially the IS, are emerging as a very serious threat for the United States, its NATO allies and Russia. Despite the existing differences on Ukraine and a host of other issues where Russia and the West are on opposite side of the barricades, cooperation on fighting the threat is possible and necessary. After all, the enemy is common and its deadly activities go far beyond the scope of a regional threat.

Russia and the West could coordinate activities in Libya. Sharing intelligence and cooperating in joint special operations against key targets could be a start of a broader process. Russia and the US-led West could launch preliminary talks on the wording of a hypothetical UN Security Council resolution to make it approved if an international effort will be required to keep the region from abyss.

North Africa should not become a divisive issue to complicate the relations between Russia and the West. The situation calls for cooperation and dialogue. The IS will soon become a thing of the past if Russia and the West set aside what divides them and concentrate on what brings them together. This approach will benefit all.

Share this:

  • Share
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Email

Like this:

Like Loading...

Filed under: Al Qaeda, Algeria, Libya, Russia, Tunis, US Foreign Policy, USA, War on Syria | Tagged: Algeria, AngloZionist Empire, Arab world, Deir Ezzor, Libya, Wars for Israel | Comments Off on Islamic State Eyes North Africa: Hot Issue on Global Agenda

Foreign Report: Spy Ring Working for «Israel» Exposed in Algeria

Posted on January 15, 2017 by martyrashrakat

Local Editor

An international spy network, comprised of at least 10 agents, operating for the “Israeli” entity was exposed and subsequently arrested in Algeria, according to Channel 2 citing Arab media networks Friday.

Soldiers

Reports indicated that the spies were operating in southern Algeria and held citizenship in a variety of African countries including Libya, Mali, Ethiopia, Liberia, Nigeria and Kenya.

The suspects were arrested on charges of espionage, attempt to create anarchy and damaging national security.

Communications equipment used by the suspects was also seized by authorities.

Arab media reported that the “Israeli” entity’s foreign intelligence agency, Mossad, assassinated in December a Hamas member operating out of Tunisia.

The target, Mohhamed Zawari, known to the “Israeli” entity’s security echelon as “The Engineer,” was found shot to death inside his vehicle in the city of Sfax, local media reported.

Five suspects were later detained by Tunisian authorities, along with multiple vehicles, weapons and mobile devices.

One Tunisian journalist said the killing was carried out by the Mossad, who had been following Zawari for some time, Channel 10 added.

Zawari, an aviation engineer and scientist, was shot three to seven times by unknown assailants in his car near his home.

Though, the motive behind his shooting remains unclear.

According to Channel 10, the nationalities of the detainees included one suspect from the Netherlands, one from Morocco and the rest from varying European countries.

Source: News Agencies, Edited by website team

14-01-2017 | 09:40

Share this:

  • Share
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Email

Like this:

Like Loading...

Filed under: Algeria, Tunis | Tagged: Algeria, AngloZionist Empire, Arab Zionists, MOSSAD, MUSLIM ZIONISTS, Palestinian Resistance, Zionist entity | 1 Comment »

Tunisians Protest Against the Return of Jihadis Like Amri

Posted on December 25, 2016 by fada1

About 200 people have protested in the Tunisian capital against the return of Tunisian jihadis who have fought abroad.

The gathering Saturday was prompted by the deadly truck attack in a Berlin Christmas market by Tunisian Anis Amri, who had pledged allegiance to the Islamic State group and was killed Friday in a police shootout. Amri, 24, was slated to be deported home from Germany.

Banners at the protest in front of Parliament in Tunis read “Close the doors to terrorism” and “No tolerance, no return.” Protesters waved Tunisian flags and sang the national anthem.

Protester Faten Mejri said “for us, they are not Tunisians. They are awful people.”

Tunisia says at least 800 Tunisian jihadis are under surveillance since returning home after fighting in Syria, Iraq and Libya

Related

 

Share this:

  • Share
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Email

Like this:

Like Loading...

Filed under: Tunis, War and Terror, War on Syria | Comments Off on Tunisians Protest Against the Return of Jihadis Like Amri

Andrew Korybko On The “Arab Spring”

Posted on December 24, 2016 by martyrashrakat

December 20, 2016

Andrew Korybko On The “Arab Spring”This text is slightly modified from an interview that Andrew Korybko gave to a Moscow-based PhD student specializing in the “Arab Spring” regime change events.

The Role Of Social Media

Social media platforms were instrumental in organizing and deploying the regime change destabilizations that took place during the “Arab Spring” theater-wide Color Revolutions. They allowed the initiators of these events to more easily connect with tens of thousands of sympathizers and propagate their provocative messages to them in a bid to incite as many participating individuals as possible. Social media at that time was naively assumed by many of the masses, especially the comparatively uneducated and less technologically adept ones of the “Arab Street”, to be the “uncensored” and “genuine” “voice of the people”, ergo why so many people fell for the narratives (some of which were deliberately misleading or outright false) being spread by core organizers through these media. Had it not been for social media platforms such as Twitter, Facebook, YouTube, and even the technical application of Google Maps (which assists with planning ‘protest’ routes and urban guerrilla warfare), it’s doubtful that the so-called “Arab Spring” would have ever unfolded as it did, let alone at all perhaps.

The “Green Revolution”

What happened in Tunisia and Egypt in 2010-2011 was the beginning of what the US hoped would be a transregional Color Revolution campaign, and it’s directly connected to the so-called “Green Revolution” which the US encouraged in Iran in 2009. The whole point of that latter exercise was to gauge the responses of the Iranian government – the strongest and most security-conscious of the Mideast states – and to identify structural vulnerabilities which could be exploited in the comparatively weaker countries of the region. The US only half-heartedly supported the “Green Revolution” because it was always meant to be a probing exercise, not a full-fledged regime change attempt, but it also had the intended aftereffect of signaling to the Ayatollah and his military-security “conservatives” that the US could do much worse against them at a future date if they don’t agree to what turned out to be forthcoming secret negotiations about the country’s nuclear energy activity. It also impacted the psyche of Iranian youth by emboldening them to vote for the “moderate” Rouhani four years later, which ultimately facilitated the eventual nuclear deal in summer 2015.

Hybrid War

The successful regime change campaigns in North Africa are emblematic of what my definition of Hybrid War is, namely the interweaving of Color Revolution and Unconventional Warfare tactics for the purpose of overthrowing a targeted government. What began as ‘peaceful’ anti-government protests provoked by external social media management techniques and in-country collaborators quickly spiraled into urban terrorism, with the main difference between Tunisia and Egypt being that the Cairo authorities held out slightly longer before capitulating to the insurgents’ demands.

As would later be seen in the case of Syria, however, the government and the vast majority of the population united in their opposition to what they already knew was a foreign-concocted regime change plot against their civilization-state, which is why they resisted so fiercely and the Color Revolution instruments were ordered to transform into outright terrorist groups such as Al Nusra, Daesh, and other “moderate rebels”.

The whole point behind the “Arab Spring” Color Revolution wave in the first place was to replace the governments in North Africa and the Levant with the Muslim Brotherhood, thus creating a transregional ideologically identical ‘super state’ which could be controlled by proxy via Neo-Ottoman Erdogan (just as the Eastern Bloc was controlled by the USSR up until a generation ago), though the geopolitical reality tremendously changed throughout the course of this campaign and thus prevented this wide-ranging geostrategic plot from succeeding.

The Role Of Foreign Influence

Foreign influence was crucially important in sparking the “Arab Spring” regime change riots, especially in North Africa. The first thing to remember is that the US works best when it’s operating indirectly, in this case, through the social and structural preconditioning that it carried out on these two states and their peoples well in advance of their formal destabilizations. Using a combination of macroeconomic instruments and ‘NGOs’, the US was able to both damage the Tunisian and Egyptian economies and consequently use various incitements to provoke the already agitated masses into coming out to the streets and overthrowing the government. It can safely be assumed that the US had at least several teams of in-country experts guiding the events, but for the most part, these operatives would not have had much success had it not been for the prior conditions that the US manipulated in shaping the dismal state of these country’s economies and fomenting widespread anti-government sympathies. Under such circumstances, all that it took was a highly publicized spark and carefully crafted Mainstream Media hysteria to set the ‘NGO’-social media apparatus into motion and craft a self-sustaining auto-synchronous destabilization which required minimal direct interference to execute its desired objective.

Foreign-Funded “Civil Society” NGOs

Foreign-funded ‘NGOs’ were used as some of the most powerful tools to destabilize Tunisia and Egypt in the run-up to, and during, the “Arab Spring” regime changes. George Soros and the scores of organizations that he directly and indirectly sponsors engage in ‘investigative’ and ‘activist’ activity which seeks to uncover corrupt relationships between public officials, the financial sector, and others. In and of itself, there’s nothing wrong with legitimately indigenous civil-society groups engaging in political and electoral criticisms, provided of course that they’re grounded in facts and not deliberately disruptive provocations, and it should of course be celebrated anytime that a corrupt individual is exposed for their illegal and unethical behavior. However, the relationships that the said civil society organizations have cultivated, as well as their and their patrons’/partners’ intent, must also be taken into consideration.

There’s a big difference between patriotic individuals carrying out the abovementioned activities for the intended betterment of their societies and internal collaborators conspiring with external (often intelligence-linked) organizers in plotting to sow unrest and topple the government. Sometimes it turns out that the latter category of “activists” are just “useful idiots” who have been duped by their naïve optimism, the comparatively hefty paychecks of their financiers, and/or the self-absorbed attention and sense of importance that they seek to receive from their work into unknowingly collaborating with forces which they aren’t even aware are foreign intelligence agents hostile to their home government. International ‘NGOs’ (INGOs) are oftentimes very shadowy like this and don’t regularly reveal their true intentions to their in-country staff, and some of them typically operate through ‘shell NGOs’ superficially based inside the targeted country, thus promoting the false perception that they are ‘indigenous’ when they’re not.

The Role Of INGOs

In the context of Hybrid War, INGOs function as the catalysts in organizing large masses of people and propagating their external patron’s political message. They operate through a combination of deceit and openness; on the one hand, they usually don’t proclaim their true regime change objectives or emphasize their foreign origins, but on the other, they do whatever they can to spread awareness about their overt or strongly inferred anti-government agenda. There are some INGOs which are officially apolitical but are in fact inherently political organizations, such as some of those dealing with environmental and animal rights. It should be emphasized that this doesn’t mean that every one of these groups is necessarily working as organizational fronts for a foreign government or has an interest in overthrowing their host government, but just that some of the most well-known names in this field such as Greenpeace have a history of engaging in political disturbances and then propagating the authorities’ response to them as alleged ‘proof’ of the given country’s ‘undemocratic nature’ and ‘lack of free speech’, all of which in turn is predicated on stoking more anti-government resentment.

As for those INGOs which are directly a part of Color Revolution destabilizations, the prevailing trend has been for them to flirt with Unconventional Warfare and urban terrorism by lobbing deadly Molotov cocktails at law enforcement officers, as well as committing crimes such as attacking civilian bystanders and vandalizing public and private property. Whenever the INGOs desire to launch a concerted ‘public action campaign’, as they euphemistically call it, and gather as many people together as they can to protest for or against whatever the carefully selected item of agitation may be, they’re in reality working to assemble a crowd in order to manipulate the inevitable mentality that’s associated with large masses of angry individuals and channel it into a ‘hive mind’ of easily guidable “activists”. These individuals are then subtly encouraged or outright goaded into sparking a confrontation with the authorities, usually by breaking municipal law in marching on a location which they weren’t legally permitted to assemble around and then violently resisting arrest.

The whole point in these sorts of stunts is to prompt situations where edited footage can then be acquired by social media “activists” or sympathetic (collaborationist) mainstream media organizations in portraying the government as the “anti-democratic aggressor” and the “protesters” as the “peaceful victims”. As it relates to Hybrid War, this is intended to strengthen the domestic and international pressure on the authorities and introduce an implicit blackmail scenario whereby the government realizes that it must back down in the face of the incipient “protest” movement otherwise it risks aggravating already high tensions and falling under increased international (Western) condemnation. The perception of the masses has already been influenced to a degree whereby some apolitical individuals begin to sympathize with the “activists” and question whether they may indeed be right after all in accusing the government of “anti-democratic and human rights abuses”. Depending on the course of the destabilization and the decisiveness of the authorities’ response to it, some of the INGO members will then break off from the larger group and form their own urban terrorist cells, at times even dangerously using the unaware apolitical crowd of sympathizers surrounding them as de-facto human shields in warding off police countermeasures such as batons and tear gas.

The self-sustaining and auto-synchronous cycle is apparent, and the escalation ladder suggests that the disorganized urban terrorists will eventually coalesce into more disciplined terrorist formations the longer that the Hybrid War is being waged, such as what happened in Syria up until the present day and in rural Western Ukraine right before the coup. If it were not for INGOs and the crowd mentality schemes that they engage in, it would be much more difficult for these actors to destabilize their host governments and promote regime change scenarios. It should be reminded, however, that many of the civilians gathering around the INGO core are usually unaware of the larger goals being pursued by the “protest” organizers. This is a convenient fact which is exploited by these groups to maximum effect in proselytizing their “official” public message to the masses and then steering their converts in the physical direction of being nearby the police’s response to the core provocateurs’ illegal actions, hoping that any ‘collateral damage’ that occurs to law-abiding civilians during this time can galvanize their incipient anti-government attitudes.

The Future Of INGOs In Egypt And Tunisia

It’s not likely that INGOs will continue to enjoy the same operational freedom under Sisi as they previously had during the last days of Mubarak, and this is simply owing to the experience that the Egyptian state has since received in terms of how these groups are used for regime change purposes. There’s also the very real threat that some INGOs are working with the outlawed Muslim Brotherhood terrorist group, which the US is slavishly sympathetic to, so national security must be considered by all responsible decision makers in Egypt when deciding on the future of INGOs. Concerning Tunisia, however, the country has historically been the most liberal of the North African states, and it doesn’t look like they’ll enact the necessary legislation needed to properly protect themselves from the regime change threat that INGOs are now associated with. Another reason is that they have the globally renowned reputation as being the ‘birthplace’ of the “Arab Spring”, which is still celebrated in the West as a “democratic uprising against totalitarianism”. Even though many Western observers have since wised up to the destabilizing consequences of these transregional Color Revolutions, Tunisia has been the least severely affected by them, which is why it’s still “officially” lionized in the Mainstream Media as the ‘birthplace of modern-day Arab democracy’.

Like it was mentioned in an earlier response, INGOs have also developed a new trend of operating through ‘shell companies’ in order to obscure their foreign nature and more adeptly deceive the domestic audience that they’re trying to target. Instead of the “Open Society Foundation” directly funding whatever ‘NGO’ it is that they envisage promoting their political agenda, for example, they’ll fund a ‘shell NGO’ first and then use that entity to spread their seed funding all throughout the country. There has yet to be any legislation implemented anywhere in the world prohibiting this arrangement from happening or formally decreeing the recipients of the ‘shell NGOs’ laundered largesse as being foreign agents, which is a critical oversight that must be legally remedied as soon as possible by all countries concerned about foreign ‘NGO’-driven Hybrid War destabilizations. While North Africa probably won’t be the first place where this loophole is closed, Egypt might follow the predictable lead of Russia and/or China in likely doing so sometime in the future, and Tunisia might also be compelled to mirror this as well if it begins to once more suffer from INGO destabilization (perhaps with Muslim Brotherhood-sympathetic Western ‘NGOs’ funding violent in-country counterparts).

Varoufakis As Soros’ EU INGO Ringleader

Hybrid War researchers and national security services must keep an eye on George Soros, Gene Sharp, and Yanis Varoufakis. The first one is globally notorious for expending tens of millions of dollars on Color Revolutions and anti-government INGOs all across the globe, while the second one runs the Albert Einstein Institute and is the strategic-tactical architect for “people’s power” unrest. The third one isn’t commonly grouped in the same category as Soros and regime change, though he very well should be considering his links to the billionaire Color Revolution financier as openly evidenced through Varoufakis’ regular contributions to Soros’ “Project Syndicate” website.

This online platform is known as a gathering place for ‘revolutionaries’ and those who desire to catalyze “change” in their societies, which is what Varoufakis now seeks to do. He launched a radical leftist-liberal organization at the beginning of 2016 called DiEM25, which he thenceforth described on “Project Syndicate” as being the beginning of a “Progressive International” which aims to defeat, among others, President Putin, who he intimates is part of a “nationalist international – a classic creature of a deflationary period – united by contempt for liberal democracy and the ability to mobilize those who would crush.” He also since said that Putin is a “war criminal” who “justifies his stranglehold over his own people”, which clearly proves that he’s in opposition to the Russian President and closely echoes what many of Moscow’s regime change opponents have falsely alleged. Given that DiEM25 hopes to become a continental-wide “Progressive International”, it must accordingly be seen as a far-reaching Color Revolution threat which ultimately aims to affect political change in Russia and cause public disruptions to Moscow’s investment deals and partnerships in the EU (per the aforementioned organizational tactics outlined in a previous answer).

Varoufakis’ extreme left-liberal “revolutionary” views could become dangerously attractive to many European and Russian youth, and the Greek demagogue’s connections with George Soros – the man behind the banned Open Society Institute – should be enough cause for Russian decision makers to worry about his intentions and responsibly contemplate preventive action. As Russia continues its post-communist transformation in becoming a conservative civilization-state, one of its greatest enemies might turn out to be the “Secular Wahhabism” that Varoufaki and his Soros-supported ilk represent.

Share this:

  • Share
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Email

Like this:

Like Loading...

Filed under: Al Qaeda, Egypt, Social Media, Tunis, USA | Tagged: "Arab Spring", Color Revolutions, ISIL, NGOs, regime change, Soros | Comments Off on Andrew Korybko On The “Arab Spring”

A Must See: Deleted 4 times in 24 hours

Posted on September 8, 2016 by martyrashrakat

 

Share this:

  • Share
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Email

Like this:

Like Loading...

Filed under: Al Qaeda, Egypt, GCC, House of Saud, IRAQ, Jordan, Lebanon, Libya, Qatar, Sudan, Syria, Tunis, Turkey, USA, War on Syria, Yemen | Tagged: "Arab Spring", "Friends of Syria", AngloZionist Empire, Civil War, ISIL, Libya, Wars for Israel, Zio-controlled media, Zionist entity | Comments Off on A Must See: Deleted 4 times in 24 hours

Next Page »
  • Blog Stats

    • 2,044,147 hits
  • What I saw in the West Bank

  • Quranic view on Russia and The Eastern Orthodox Christianity

  • ZIONISM is Predicted in the QURAN 1400 years ago

    Part 1

    Part 2

    Part3

  • The Story of Palestine

  • TALMUD AT WORK

    -
  • Deal of the Cencury

  • Reading future

  • RSS Al Manar

    • Earthquake felt in Beirut and Mount Lebanon: reports
    • Iraqi premier, Mustafa Al-Kadhimi orders reshuffle in security agencies and commanders assuming responsibility of the blast scene
    • World Bank Approves $34 Million to Back Lebanon’s Vaccination Drive, MP Says First Batch of Pfizer Shots to Arrive by Early February
    • Lebanon Extends All-Day Lockdown by Two Weeks
    • WH Says Biden to Focus on Iran Deal Re-Entry in Calls with US Allies
    • Some 93 Deaths Caused by COVID-19 in Iran
    • Spokesman of Yemen’s Ansarullah movement, Mohammad Abdul Salam, condemns criminal bombing in Baghdad, highlights Iraqi’s right to restore security and expel the US occupation forces from their country
    • President Rouhani: Enemies of Iranian Nation Overthrown in Disgrace
    • Fauci: Biden to sign letter on US joining WHO’s COVAX Vaccination program
    • Lebanese ministerial committee convening at Grand Serail tackles lockdown extension recommended by Higher Defense Council
  • RSS Strategic Culture

    • Oak Flat: Trump’s Final Middle Finger to the Environment
    • America’s Decrepit Nuclear Industry Is Inviting Disaster
    • Viral #TrumpsNewArmy Video Is Liberals at Their Craziest and Scariest
    • Why the 1996 Russian Election Was an All-Important Turning Point
    • Biden Inaugural Guest Is Venezuelan Coup Leader Charged With Inciting Violent Assault on Gov’t Building
    • Why ‘Texit’ Is Naive at Best
    • Americans Have Unrealistic Expectations for a COVID-19 Vaccine
    • The Storms Before the Possible Calm
    • Strategic Session, Episode 1
    • How Billionaires Transfer Blame to Others
  • RSS Global Research

    • About Suffering: A Massacre of the Innocent in Yemen
    • Cuba Solidarity Campaign Statement on the United States Listing of Cuba as a State Sponsor of Terrorism
    • ‘Stripped to the Bone’: Israel Advances Plan to Cut Off Palestinian Suburb from Jerusalem
    • Russia’s Financial Strategy for Africa
    • Why Hardly Anyone Trusts the Virus Experts
  • RSS The Saker

    • Which nation will US Democrats try to destroy in the next 4 years?
    • Zone B exists, thus there is hope, I promise you!
    • Hacking the human mind
    • America’s First Revolution Is Happening Now
    • Trump’s Opponents Succeeded With Their Government Coup (Ruslan Ostashko)
    • Welcome to the “New Woke USA”: Twerk on Washington!
    • Moveable Feast Cafe 2021/01/19 … Open Thread
    • Baghdad on the Potomac: Welcome to the Blue Zone
    • Iran Expands Intelligence Network Near Jordan And Israel
    • What is to be Done?
  • RSS Stephen Lendman

    • An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.
  • RSS Palestine news

    • Al-Haq welcomes B’Tselem’s recognition of Israeli apartheid
    • Another Palestinian prisoner dies in Israeli jails
    • Israel going on with bids to build a settlement units despite int’l criticism
    • Settlers uproot over 100 olive seedlings east of Yatta
    • Groups: Vaccine Roll-Out Exposes Israel’s Inhumane Acts of Apartheid
    • The first batch of the Russian vaccine to arrive in the West Bank today
    • Young Palestinians look forward to elections
    • News Analysis: Challenges shadow Palestinian election call despite hope
    • MOFA: The official Israeli mentality supports settler terrorism
    • Shtayyeh calls on EU to prepare team of observers for elections
  • RSS Land Destroyer

    • Same Networks that Sold Us War Promote Pfizer’s Vaccines
    • Iran's Warning to US-funded Agitators
    • Continuity of Agenda: Trump’s was Obama’s will be Biden’s Asia Strategy
    • Is the US Isolating China? Or Itself?
    • Ex-Thai PM Thaksin Shinawatra Explains Best Why 2006 Coup Was Necessary
  • RSS Rehmat

    • An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.
  • RSS Alahed News

    • UAE Inks Last-minute Deal with US to Buy Fighter Jets, Drones Before Biden’s Inauguration
    • Qatar Suspends WTO Dispute with UAE As Gulf Conflict Thaws
    • UAE, “Israel” Postpone Visa Exemption Deal Over COVID-19 Worries
    • Emirati Airlines Suspends Tunisian Pilot for Refusing to Fly to “Israeli” Occupied Palestinian Territories
    • Oman to Get Its First Crown Prince in Constitutional Overhaul
    • Qatar-Saudi Border Reopens after Thaw
    • UAE Starts Trials of Russia’s Sputnik V Coronavirus Vaccine as Cases Rise
    • UAE: No Diplomatic Ties to Qatar Yet, But Trade, Travel Resuming
    • Emirates Airline Set To Offer Tel Aviv Flights from February 15
    • Iran, Qatar Foreign Ministers Discuss Regional Developments
  • RSS Mouqawamah Music

    • Judaic Fanaticism Is The Motivation Behind The Latest ‘Israeli’ Attack On Kata’ib Imam Ali
    • Nutty Netty Be Lying: Criminal ‘Israeli’ Regime Laughably Denies Role In Suleimani (R.A.) Assassination
    • Operation Martyr Suleimani: Iran Begins Avenging Hajj Qassem (R.A.), Humiliates The US ZOG
    • In Yemen, The Mouqawamist March Of Millions Continues: Ansarullah Honors Suleimani (R.A.) And Al-Mohandes (R.A.)
    • Let The Empire Of Parasites Know: Iranian Revolutionary Hero Hajj Qassem Suleimani (R.A.) Is Loved
  • RSS Syria Times

    • An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.
  • Uprooted Palestinian

    • Geneva II Battle: Failure is staring at Brahimi and “Friends of Syria” in the face
    • Geneva 2: Syrian lesson to the the enemy, the “enemy within” and the “theory of everyone”
    • ‘The War on Terror: Hezbollah hails Lebanese army great achievements against terrorists
    • THE MIND MAZE OF DANIEL MABSOUT
    • The Liar wants his Lies removed
    • A LESSON TO ALL (Except Daniel Mabsout)
    • “Terrorism is not Wahabism” – Omar Atrash Charged in Haret Hreik 2 Blasts – Military Court Judge Charges 12 People for Forming (SO-CALLED) Terrorist Group
    • The liar, Brotherhood, AL SISI, Assad, AND THE UPROOTED PALESTINIAN CAUSE
    • THE GIANT IS NEITHER SLEEPING NOR DEAD
    • The Zionist’s “Muslim” war on Resistance June 16, 2013
    • O traitor Meshaal: Martyr Shaikh Ahmed Yassin said hours before his death, April 2, 2013
    • Qatar killed commander Ahmed Jabari with Wristwatch bearing high explosives C4 material March 30, 2013
    • From the Grand Imam of Umayyad Mosque to the Grand Brother of America March 29, 2013
    • O Hamas guys …Hamas needs a revolution .. Vedio added March 29, 2013
    • How to unite muslims?? Two ways to stop the "Shiite tsunami"??  February 18, 2013
    • "Do not return to Kufr, killing one another, after I am gone." Why Is "Muslim" Morsi Killing Egyptians? February 3, 2013
    •  Updated:Terrorist Saqr al-Qassam (a Hamas leader) killed while fighting in Nusrae front ranks in Idleb January 5, 2013
    • Is Alan Hart Running Cover For AIPAC?? By Brother Nathanael Kapner December 24, 2012
    • Netanyahu and Meshaal: Honeymoon in 2 Adjoining Bed Rooms December 14, 2012
    • Damascus, opened its seven gates doors to Meshaal .. He betrayed Syria and chosed to be a slave in the court of Hamad December 8, 2012
    • Italian newspaper: Wesam al-Hassan held a secret meeting with a delegation from the "Hamas" in Berlin one day before he was assassinated  December 3, 2012
    • On Abbas statehood, Hamastan, Jordan Option and the War on Syria December 3, 2012
    • Hypocrite Khaled Meshaal  المنافق خالد مشعل
    • Updated: "Slip of Clinton’s tongue": "Hamas" assassinated the chief of Syrian missile program!? November 26, 2012
    • Hamas to Mursi: "May God have Bless Mubarak" .. Open crossings and free Aqsa!! November 10, 2012
    • Meet Syria’s "freedom fighters" November 2, 2012
    • Brotherhood’s Sectarian War on Syria October 28, 2012
    • THE ZIONIST WAR AGAINST ISLAM October 10, 2012
    • "Ottoman sultan" between heating the Syrian front and the collapse of the Sultanate
    • Syria, PKK and Hamas: Loyalty and Betrayal October 9, 2012
    • The ungrateful "son" of Hamas would be the next Nato Mufiti October 7, 2012
    • Damuscus: The new Whorehood’s First Qibla, and Second Haram September 7, 2012
    • On American Brother’s Hamayreh and "Shiite extremists" September 3, 2012 
    • Palestinian Reconciliation: Cocking aggregates July 27, 2012
    • Uri’s Muslim Brothers July 25, 2012
    • Egypt Brothers: Erasing History July 24, 2012
    • Khalid "Ibn Sabaa" faning Sunni-Shae Fitna July 16, 2012
    • "US Marines stick together" the story of a "Palestinian" Bastard  June 14, 2012
    • Khalid Amayereh calling for "UNITY"?? June 3, 2012
    • Brothers of America calls for intervention in Syria May 28, 2012
    • Clueless Arab and Palestinian leaders and pundits May 14, 2012
    • Khalid Amayereh: The "sincere" Man is behaving in a theatrical manner these days- just these day!!April 16, 2012
    • Egypt’s Muslim stupidhood Reassures Washington April 10, 2012
    • Iran, Syria, "Brotherhood Spring" and the ongoinig war on Gaza March 13, 2012
    • "Success will never come from deviant" March 2, 2012
    • What About Syria? February 29, 2012
    • Uri Avnery is worried: Obama on the wrong side of history, Uri is not?February 20, 2011
    • How about an international award for hypocrisy? February 9, 2012
    • The Case Of Uri Avnery I: “Shukran, Israel” Analyzed And Refuted February 4, 2012
    • What Hamas wants? Whatever you try, today, you will not get a Hamas clear answer to the Question: Is Qatar and Saudi are supported resistance? Or others? February 3, 2012
    • Khalid Amayreh: "We expect…" January 17, 2012
    • Rats desert a sinking ship, fools ride January 15, 2012 
    • "Is it a pre-condition to recognize Israel in order to govern?" January 8, 2012 
    • The Ugly Face of the Muslim Brotherhood January 7, 2012
    • Brothers of America January 1, 2012
    • Amayereh, indirectly,addressing himself and his brothers: Don’t allow yourselves to fall into the trap. December 25, 2011
    • Inventing a war December 15, 2011
    • Nasser On Socialism, The Muslim Brotherhood, & Islam December 10, 2011 
    • Feltman: Brotherhood will respect Camp David – Palestinian Reconciliation would not be achieved, because Hamas is a Terrorist Organization December 9, 2011
    • "We can’t take people’s support for granted." December 7, 2011
    • Divide to Rule: "Arab Spring" between Secularism and sectarianism.December 3, 2011
    • The Abbas-Mishaal encounter: what is next? – The start of a ”real" Palestinian partnership November 27, 2011
    • UN Trusteeship Not Membership – Another way to change the regime in Palestine November 8, 2011
    • Exclusive: Gordaffi at Gaddafi’s Capture and the "next mission" November 4, 2011
    • Biden prescription for winning wars without losing a single life. (Making new Bin Ladens)November 4, 2011
    • Gordon Duff Calling for unity??? What Time is It? October 29, 2011
    • Real Islam in harmony with real democracy. October 28, 2011
    • On Alan Hart and naked Hypocrisy October 8, 2011
    • "All vows, oaths, promises, engagements, and swearing,……"September 29, 2011
    • Prof’ William A. Cook: Tearing the Veil From Israel’s Civility-a book review – Commented by UP September 20, 2011
    • Is Israel getting the message? Asks Mr. Amayreh,
    • "Veteran" Sami Jadallah: Time For Regime Change in Palestine September 19, 2011
    • A letter from a 1948 settler to 1967 settlers in Gaza September 1, 2010
    • On Khalid Amayreh, Syrian Brothers "revolution"  and the great day for Palestine  May 1, 2011
    • Khalid Amayreh: "The Syrian regime must change, or it will be changed"April 28, 2011
    • KEN O’KEEFE-GORDON DUFF: NEW ATTACKS IN GAZA, CENSORED FROM WESTERN PRESS (EXCLUSIVE-VIDEO) February 11, 2011
    • They Invented a Religion to Steal a Land from Its Owners January 4, 2011
    • On "Socialist Worker’s wake up!", after "Each village is a reminder" September 8, 2010
    • DesertPoison: PALESTINE BETRAYED BY ITS OWNSeptember 6, 2010
    • Palestinian Idiot: Advice to Erdogan and to Turkey: Don’t Trust the Arab Throngs, Don’t lose your old Friends, Nato and IsraelJune 10, 2010
  • Categories

    • 6/1
    • 9/11
    • Afghanistan
    • Africa
    • African Americans
    • AIPAC
    • Al Qaeda
    • Algeria
    • Allah
    • America
    • American Aggression
    • American crimes
    • American Elite
    • American Empire
    • American Hegemony
    • American Lies
    • American Politics
    • American Racism
    • American Society
    • American Wars
    • Amnesty International
    • Analysis
    • Ansarullah
    • Antisemitism
    • Arabic Language NationalDay
    • Armenia
    • Art of War
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • Asia
    • Australia
    • Austria
    • Bahrain
    • Balfour declaration
    • Bandar
    • BBC
    • BDS
    • Belgium
    • Big Pharma
    • Bill Gates
    • Bloody Gas
    • Bloody Oil
    • Boris Johnson
    • Bosnia Herzegovina
    • BREXIT
    • BRICS
    • Britain
    • British Empire
    • Bulgaria
    • Canada
    • Capitalism
    • Children
    • China
    • Christmas
    • CIA
    • CIA Black Ops
    • CLASH OF CIVILIZATIONS
    • Climate Change
    • Clinton
    • Colonialism
    • Controlled Opposition
    • Corona virus
    • Corporate America
    • CPEC
    • Daesh
    • De-legitimizing Israel
    • Deal of the Century
    • Deir Yassin
    • Democracy
    • Dictatorship
    • Discrimination
    • Double standards
    • Drug trafficking
    • East Eurpoe
    • Economic war
    • Economy
    • Egypt
    • Enforced Speech
    • Ethiopia
    • EU
    • Eurasia
    • Europe
    • extremism
    • Fabrications
    • Face Book
    • Fake News
    • False Flags
    • Fascism
    • Finland
    • France
    • Freedom
    • Freedom of Press
    • Freedom of Speach
    • Freedom of Speech
    • Future Movement
    • Gas and Oil
    • GCC
    • Geneva II
    • Genocide
    • Germany
    • Ghetto
    • Global Disinformation
    • Global Elite
    • Global MSM
    • Global Zionism
    • Globalization
    • Greater Israel
    • Greece
    • Hasbara
    • Hate
    • Herzl
    • Hezbollah
    • Hindu Imperialism
    • Hindu nationalism
    • Hindu Zionists
    • History Revision
    • Hitler
    • hollywood
    • Holocaust
    • Hong Kong
    • House of Saud
    • HRW
    • Human Rights
    • Hungary
    • I smell a rat
    • IAEA
    • ICC
    • Identity Politics
    • IDF
    • Imam Ali
    • Imperialism
    • Imran Khan
    • India
    • India-Israel Relations
    • India-Russia Relations
    • Indian Hegemony
    • Indian Lies
    • Indian Lobby
    • Indian Terrorism
    • Indo-Russian Relations
    • INF
    • Internet and Communication
    • Interviews
    • Iran
    • Iran-India Relations
    • IRAQ
    • Ireland
    • ISIS
    • Islam
    • Islamic jurisprudence crisis
    • Islamic sites
    • Islamophobia
    • Israel
    • ISRAEL SHAMIR
    • Israel-Russia Relations
    • Israel-UK Relations
    • Israeli Aggression
    • Israeli Crimes
    • Israeli Identity
    • Israeli Settlements
    • Italy
    • Japan
    • Japan
    • Jerusalem
    • Jesus
    • Jewish terrorism
    • Jews
    • Jonathan Cook
    • Jordan
    • Journalism
    • Judaism
    • Judaization
    • Julian Assange
    • Jurisprudence savagery
    • Justice
    • Khamenei
    • Korea
    • KRG
    • Kurdistan
    • kurds
    • Kuwait
    • Labour Party
    • Latin America
    • Lebanon
    • Lebanon's army
    • Left
    • Levant
    • Liberation
    • liberation
    • Libya
    • Macron
    • Malaysia
    • Managed Democracy
    • Martyrdom
    • Mass media
    • Mass Migration
    • Media
    • MEK
    • Middle East
    • Morocco
    • Morroco
    • MOSSAD
    • Multiculturalism
    • multipolar world
    • Multipolar World Order
    • Muslim Unity
    • Muslims
    • Myanmar
    • NAM
    • NATO
    • Nazi Israel
    • neo-nazis
    • Nepal
    • New Left
    • New World Order
    • Newzealand
    • Nigeria
    • Nobel Peace Prize
    • North Korea
    • Norway
    • NWO
    • Obama
    • OBOR
    • Occupation
    • Occupied Jammu Kashmir
    • Oh Mohammad
    • OIC
    • Oman
    • Pak-Iran Relations
    • Pakistan
    • Palestine
    • Palestinians
    • Pentagon
    • PJAK
    • PKK
    • Poland
    • Political Correctness
    • Polls
    • Pope
    • Popular Revolutions
    • Portugal
    • Propaganda
    • Propaganda War
    • PSYCO WAR
    • Putin
    • Qatar
    • Quran
    • Quranic Islam
    • Racism
    • Ramallah Traitors
    • Reform
    • Religion
    • Religous Correctness
    • Rohingya
    • Rothschilds
    • Russia
    • Russophobia
    • Sarkozy
    • Saudi Arabia
    • Scotland
    • sectarianism
    • Secularism
    • self-hating Jew
    • self-loving
    • Serbia
    • Sex Slavery
    • Sexual Abuse
    • Shalom
    • Sino-Pak Relations
    • Slavery
    • Social Media
    • South Africa
    • South Korea
    • South-East Asia
    • Spain
    • Sri Lanka
    • Sudan
    • Supremacism
    • Sweden
    • Sykes-Picot
    • Syria
    • Syria Assad
    • Syria Golan Heights
    • Taiwan
    • Takfiris
    • Taliban
    • Talmud At Work
    • Targeted killings
    • Terrorism
    • The End Game
    • The Migrant Crisis
    • The Only "Democracy" in ME
    • The War on Yemen
    • Tony Blair
    • Torah
    • Torture
    • Transfer
    • treason
    • Tripoli
    • Truce
    • Truth
    • Tunis
    • Turkey
    • UAE
    • UK
    • Ukraine
    • UN
    • Uncategorized
    • UNDOF
    • UNESCO
    • UNHRC
    • UNICEF
    • UNIFIL
    • Unipolar World Order
    • United Nations
    • UNRWA
    • UNSC
    • Uprooted Palestinians
    • US Foreign Policy
    • US Military Industrial Complex
    • US MSM
    • US-India Relations
    • US-Iran Relations
    • US-Israel Relations
    • US-Russia Relations
    • US-Saudi Relations
    • USA
    • USSR
    • Venezuela
    • victimhood
    • Vietnam
    • Wahabism At Work
    • Walls of Shame
    • WAR
    • War and Terror
    • War Crimes and Criminals
    • War on Afghanistan
    • War on Gaza
    • War on Iran
    • War on Iraq
    • War on Syria
    • War on Yemen
    • West Bank
    • Western Hegemony
    • Western Imperialism
    • Western Lies
    • Western Propaganda
    • Western Zionists
    • whistle blowers
    • White Helmets
    • White Supremacy
    • Wikileaks
    • WMD
    • WMD Hoax
    • World Peace
    • Yarmouk
    • Yemen
    • Youtube
    • Yugoslavia
    • Zionism
    • Zionist Lobby
    • عربي
  • Blog Stats

    • 2,044,147 hits

Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com. WP Designer.

UPROOTED PALESTINIANS: SALAM ALQUDS ALAYKUM
Blog at WordPress.com.
loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.
Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
Cancel
%d bloggers like this: