Lebanon to complain to UNSC about israeli violation


Lebanese Foreign Minister Gebran Bassil
Lebanese Foreign Minister Gebran Bassil

Lebanon’s Foreign Minister Gebran Bassil says the Arab country will lodge an “urgent complaint” with the United Nations Security Council against Israel over an airstrike conducted from the Lebanese airspace on a military facility in the western Syrian province of Hama.

Bassil issued a directive to Lebanese Ambassador to the UN Nawaf Salam on Saturday, calling on him to take the measure “after Israeli authorities admitted to have carried out a missile attack against targets on Syrian territories from Lebanese airspace.”

The Syrian army said in a statement on September 7 that Israeli warplanes had fired a number of missiles at 2:42 a.m. local time (0042 GMT) from the Lebanese airspace against one of its military positions near the town of Masyaf, located approximately 40 kilometers west of the provincial capital city of Hama.

The army statement then warned about the “dangerous repercussions of this aggressive action to the security and stability of the region.”

Syria’s official news agency, SANA, later reported that the air raid had killed two people at the site and caused material damage.

The Syrian army operates a military facility north of Masyaf, which includes a training camp and a branch of the Scientific Studies and Research Center, according to an AFP report.

This file photo shows two Israeli Air Force F-16 fighter jets in flight.

Israel violates Lebanon’s airspace on an almost daily basis, claiming the flights serve surveillance purposes. 

Lebanon’s government, the Hezbollah resistance movement and the UN Interim Force in Lebanon, known as UNIFIL, have repeatedly condemned the overflights, saying they are in clear violation of UN Resolution 1701 and the country’s sovereignty.

UN Security Council Resolution 1701, which brokered a ceasefire in the war of aggression Israel launched against Lebanon in 2006, calls on Tel Aviv to respect Beirut’s sovereignty and territorial integrity.

In 2009, Lebanon filed a complaint with the United Nations, presenting over 7,000 documents pertaining to Israeli violations of Lebanese territory.


Commentary: The Conflict in Syria Was Always Israel’s War

[ Ed. note – Syria seems to be on the threshold of a final and decisive victory over ISIS. With six years worth of effort and more than a billion dollars spent in the quest to topple Bashar Assad, the regime-changers finally seem to be throwing in the towel. Israel, of course, is none too happy with the current turn of events.

According to a report here, the Zionist state “is gearing up to hold its largest military drill in nearly 20 years” on its border with Lebanon, this apparently in anticipation of a war with Hezbollah. This should come as no surprise, really. The video below highlights the not insignificant contributions made by Hezbollah in the defeat of ISIS/Daesh.

In the article below Whitney Webb makes a persuasive argument that Israel, and not the US, was in reality all along the “mastermind of the plan” to overthrow Assad. Webb states that it was Israel which “not only drafted the original blueprint for the Syrian conflict but guided U.S. involvement by exerting its powerful influence over the foreign policy of that country.” The words “led by the nose” of course come to mind.

And in addition to being led by the nose into a war in Syria, the nose hooks fastened tightly to our leaders now seem to be leading us into supporting whatever scheme the Israelis are presently cooking up in Lebanon. Recently Ambassador Nikki Haley successfully pushed through the Security Council a measure designed to force UNIFIL, the UN peacekeeping force in Lebanon, to become more assertive and confrontational with Hezbollah. As the New York Times reported:

Both Israel and the United States have grown increasingly strident in recent days over what they have described as a blatant buildup of Iranian weaponry by Hezbollah in southern Lebanon including hidden rockets. They have accused Unifil of turning a blind eye to it.

How long will the American people be content to fight wars for Israel? Will they at some point get fed up with it? ]


By Whitney Webb

After years of fomenting the Syrian conflict from the shadows, the U.S. has recently seemed to back away from its push to militarily intervene in the embattled nation, instead choosing to focus its saber-rattling and destabilization efforts on other theaters. The consequence of this has seemingly been the winding down of the long-running conflict, now entering its seventh year.

Buoyed by Russia, Iran and Lebanon, the Syrian government led by President Bashar al-Assad has managed to retake vast swaths of territory, all while surviving and growing stronger over the course of a largely foreign-funded onslaught. As a result, many of the governments that were instrumental in funding and arming the so-called “moderate” opposition have begun to extricate themselves, unwilling to further test the resilience of Assad or the Syrian people.

With some anticipating the long-awaited conclusion of the Syrian conflict, recent threats from Israel’s government to assassinate Assad by bombing his residence seemed to appear out of the blue. According to the Jerusalem Post, a senior Israeli official accompanying Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on a recent visit to Russia warned the Kremlin that if Iran continues to “extend its reach” in Syria, Israel would bomb the presidential palace in Damascus.

Israel’s comments should come as no surprise, however, as the foreign-funded and manufactured conflict in Syria was always Israel’s war. The only real surprise is Israel’s growing isolation in pushing for the further escalation of the conflict.

Though it has successfully avoided being labeled a major player in the effort to oust Assad, Israel has long been the mastermind of the plan, which stems in large part from the long-standing hostilities between the two nations as well as Israel’s own regional ambitions. State Department diplomatic cables released by WikiLeaks have shown that in 2006, five years before the conflict in Syria manifested, the government of Israel had hatched a plan to overthrow the Assad government by engineering sectarian strife in the country, creating paranoia within the highest-ranks of the Syrian government, and isolating Syria from its strongest regional ally, Iran.

Israel then passed this plan along to the United States, which would then involve Saudi Arabia, Turkey, Qatar and Egypt in fomenting the “breakdown” of the Assad regime as a way of weakening both Iran and Hezbollah — with the effect of empowering both Israel and the Gulf monarchies, two seemingly disparate forces in the region that are becoming increasingly allied.

Leaked emails belonging to former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton further reveal Israel’s role in covertly creating the conflict and its clear role in securing the involvement of the U.S. and other nations in executing its plan for Assad’s removal. One email, forwarded by Clinton to her advisor Jacob Sullivan, argues that Israel is convinced that Iran would lose “its only ally” in the region were Assad’s government to collapse.

It further stated that “The fall of the House of Assad could well ignite a sectarian war between the Shiites and the majority Sunnis of the region drawing in Iran, which, in the view of Israeli commanders would not be a bad thing for Israel and its Western allies.” This possible sectarian war was perceived as a potential “factor in the eventual fall of the current government of Iran.”

Another Clinton email released by WikiLeaks stated”

The best way to help Israel deal with Iran’s growing nuclear capability is to help the people of Syria overthrow the regime of Bashar Assad,”


Bringing down Assad would not only be a massive boon to Israel’s security, it would also ease Israel’s understandable fear of losing its nuclear monopoly.”

The email also notes:

A successful intervention in Syria would require substantial diplomatic and military leadership from the United States” and states that “arming the Syrian rebels and using western air power to ground Syrian helicopters and airplanes is a low-cost high payoff approach.”

Continued here


South Front

Israeli Media Accuses Russia Of Providing Diplomatic Support To Hezbollah In UN Security Council


Russia has worked behind the scenes providing Hezbollah a diplomatic cover in the United Nations Security Council (UNSC), the Israeli Haaretz newspaper reported citing Israeli sources.

According to the newspaper, Russia threatened to veto US and Israeli moves against Hezbollah as the UNSC weighed extending and expanding a mandate of the UN Interim Force in Lebanon (UNIFIL).

The Russian side allegedly pushed to remove “the direct reference to Hezbollah as conducting prohibited military activity in southern Lebanon that is in violation of Resolution 1701.

As a result the UNSC unanimously voted to renew Resolution 1701 last week but only after the US and Israel had agreed to remove paragraphs that were critical of Hezbollah.

The US-Israeli attempt to use the resolution to put an additional pressure on Hezbollah in southern Lebanon failed.

Haaretz linked this with the Russian involvement in the ongoing Syrian conflict where Moscow sided with the Assad government, Tehran and Hezbollah in a battle against ISIS and al-Qaeda.

The UNIFIL patrols Lebanon’s southern border with Israel where Hezbollah has a strong presence. The US and Israel describe Hezbollah as a terrorist organization.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu criticized the resolution and blamed Hezbollah for alleged arms trafficking in southern Lebanon.

The UNSC discussion over Resolution 1701 followed a meeting between Netanyahu and Russian President Vladimir Putin in the Russian city of Sochi where the Israeli prime minister was attempting to bargain with the Russian leadership over the future of Syria. The Israeli leadership is concerned over the growing Shia influence in the country. However, it seems Netaniyahu failed to gain a Russian support over this issue.


يحيى دبوق

إدانة حزب الله في مجلس الأمن خطّ أحمر روسي، ويدفع موسكو إلى استخدام حق النقض. هذا ما كشفت عنه أمس مصادر دبلوماسية إسرائيلية، شاركت في المداولات التي سبقت صدور قرار التمديد لقوة اليونيفيل عاماً إضافياً.

والتهديد الروسي باستخدام الفيتو لمصلحة حزب الله في مجلس الامن قد يعدّ نقلة نوعية للدبلوماسية الروسية، رغم أنه في الواقع تعبير طبيعي ومنطقي عن حقيقة التحالف الاستراتيجي القائم بين روسيا ومحور المقاومة، والذي يتجاوز في أهدافه «مهمة» مساعدة الدولة السورية على مواجهة التهديدات، بل يرتبط أيضاً باليوم الذي يلي انتصار الدولة السورية، ليمتد حضوره إلى الإقليم. تحالف دفع معهد أبحاث الأمن القومي في تل أبيب إلى التأكيد، في بحث صدر عنه أخيراً، أن موسكو تنظر إلى الوجود الإيراني وحزب الله في سوريا على أنه «ثروة روسية».

إذاً، أمّنت موسكو مظلة حمائية في المحفل الدولي الأهم، مجلس الأمن، ومنعت عن حزب الله حملة تحريض وتشويه كانت تهدف إليها إسرائيل والولايات المتحدة. لكن الخطوة لا تقتصر، بتداعياتها ونتائجها المباشرة وغير المباشرة، على موضوعة اليونيفيل وتعديلات تفويضها. محور الرسالة الروسية المباشرة هو القوة الدولية، لكن خلفياتها وأهدافها تتجاوز ذلك، لتشير إلى المقاربة الروسية العملانية للساحتين السورية واللبنانية. وهي تشكل نوعاً من الخطوط الحمراء الضمنية الروسية، والتي قد ترتقي لاحقاً في حال ارتقاء الجهة المقابلة.

واذا كان رئيس الحكومة الاسرائيلية بنيامين نتنياهو قد سارع إلى موسكو في أعقاب تيقّنه من انتصار الدولة السورية وحلفائها في سوريا، عارضاً أمام الرئيس الروسي فلاديمير بوتين خطوطه الحمراء لمرحلة ما بعد الانتصار، إلا أن الأخير اختار كجواب على هذه التهديدات، التي تطال أيضاً ومن ناحية استراتيجية المصالح الروسية في سوريا، مسارين اثنين:

في الأول، دعا بوتين نتنياهو إلى التواصل معه في شؤون المنطقة، بعد أن استعرض الثاني تهديداته و«خطوطه الحمراء» الجديدة إزاء الساحة السورية التي تنصّ على إبعاد حزب الله وإيران عن سوريا. وهي دعوة من بوتين، بمفهوم التهديد الضمني، أن الموقف من أيّ تطور في سوريا يمكن معالجته فقط عبر البوابة الحصرية الروسية، وبما تسمح به موسكو، وفي حدّ أدنى، التفاهم معها. موقف كان على تل أبيب أن تدرك أنه دعوة إلى «التعقل» في سياق تهديداتها المتواصلة للساحة السورية.

في المسار الثاني، العملاني، اختار بوتين توجيه رسالة من نوع آخر، عبر المداولات التي سبقت قرار التمديد لليونيفيل. تداعيات هذه الخطوة المباشرة جاءت كبحاً لطموحات إسرائيلية وأميركية هدفت إلى تغيير تفويض اليونيفيل، أو ساعدت، بعبارة أدق، كثيراً على كبح هذه الطموحات. لكن الخطوة الروسية في الوقت نفسه هي رسالة تتجاوز موضوعة القوة الدولية وتعدّ استعراضاً روسياً مضاداً للاستعراض الإسرائيلي المتواصل منذ أسابيع وأشهر. بمعنى، إذا كانت إسرائيل تهدد بإمكان تفعيل قوتها لإظهار تصميمها بأن «رب البيت سيجنّ» في حال لم تلبِّ موسكو مطالبها ضد إيران وحزب الله في سوريا، فقد اختار بوتين ساحة الأمم المتحدة للرد على هذا الاستعراض، من بين ردود أخرى، لم تظهر حتى الآن إلى العلن.

وكانت صحيفة هآرتس، التي كشفت «الرسالة الروسية» أمس، قد نقلت عن مصادر سياسية إسرائيلية رفيعة المستوى قولها إن المسعى الابتدائي لواشنطن في تضمين نص قرار التمديد لليونيفيل إدانة لحزب الله، ووجه برفض روسي قاطع، فيما أكدت البعثة الإسرائيلية في اتصالاتها مع تل أبيب أن الخط الأحمر والفيتو الروسيين كانا حاضرين في حال ذكر اسم حزب الله في نص القرار.

وبحسب كلام موظف إسرائيلي رفيع المستوى، التصرف الروسي ليس إلا واحداً من بين مظاهر كثيرة تشهد على التقارب القائم بين روسيا وحزب الله، ونتيجة للائتلاف بين روسيا وإيران، الذي تكوّن في الأساس لمساعدة نظام (الرئيس السوري، بشار) الأسد في سوريا. وكما يؤكد المصدر، المصالح الروسية في سوريا والأنشطة العسكرية المشتركة بين الروس وحزب الله، ضد داعش وبقية التنظيمات المسلحة هناك، كانت كافية كي تدفع موسكو لمساعدة حزب الله سياسياً في مجلس الأمن.

وبحسب «هآرتس»، الجدير بالذكر أن الخطوة الروسية أتت بعد أيام قليلة من لقاء نتنياهو ببوتين. وفي ذلك أكثر من دلالة حول الموقف الروسي من المطالب الإسرائيلية التي نقلها إليه، بشأن اليوم الذي يلي انتصار المحور المعادي لإسرائيل، في سوريا.


Related Video


خارطة طريق الحرب التي ترسم سقف التفاهم الإستراتيجي بين روسيا ومحور المقاومة وتفسر الموقف المشترك من إسرائيل وخيبة نتنياهو في موسكو فتحرير مزارع شبعا والجولان هدفان متفق عليهما لرسم حزام الأمن في منطقة البحار الخمسة لفتح باب الحق الفلسطيني على قيام دولة كاملة او إنتفاضة ومقاومة مستمرتين …المعارك ترسم ما بعدها لكن المعركة الأولى مرسومة ضمن سقوف التفاهمات الكبرى للحلفاء …روسيا تحت سقف القانون الدولي ومحور المقاومة تحت سقف الحق والحرب على سوريا تقفل بأن يدفع صاحبها الإسرائيلي فاتورة الهزيمة فيها …من لا يصدق فليسأل نفسه هل كان يصدق قولنا السابق منذ أربع سنوات …لو إستدعى إنتصار سوريا ان يأتي الجيش الروسي والحرس الثوري وكل قوات حزب الله …وحتى الجيش الصيني …فسيأتون ؟

Related Articles

Sayyed Nasrallah on 2nd Liberation: Lebanon Protected…US-’Israeli’ Scheme Falling Apart

Zeinab Essa

31-08-2017 | 20:13

Hezbollah Secretary General His Eminence Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah delivered Thursday a speech celebrating the 2nd Liberation, represented by liberating the Lebanese eastern borders from the terrorist groups.

Sayyed Nasrallah on 2nd Liberation: Lebanon Protected...US-’Israeli’ Scheme Falling Apart

Addressing a huge crowd of people in Baalbek, Sayyed Nasrallah apologized for not being able to be among them.

“I liked to be among you in Baalbek on this glorious day, the same as I went to Bint Jbeil on May 25, 2000, but the situation after 2006 war is different, especially that the “Israelis” are angry and the US scheme is being defeated in the region,” His Eminence said.

He further congratulated the people for this great victory: “This victory is that of the army, people and resistance against all terrorists, who were occupying our precious land.”

39 years on the kidnap of Imam Musa al-Sadr by the former toppled Libyan regime, Sayyed Nasrallah emphasized that Sayyed al-Sadr was a man in a nation. “His cause is dear to all of us,” he mentioned.

Meanwhile, His Eminence saluted Lebanese House Speaker Nabih Berri over his national stances. “He has always proven that he is the man of all challenges and the guarantee of national unity,” he added.

Back to title of celebration, Sayyed Nasrallah clarified that the terrorists’ control of the Lebanese-Syrian eastern border has formed a threat for both Lebanon and Syria.

As he hailed the fact that there are political forces in Lebanon that supported confrontation with terrorists on the eastern border, His Eminence unveiled that

“some Lebanese were neutral towards the terror on our northern and eastern borders, some were positive towards the terrorists and offered them assistance, as other political forces chose confrontation.”

“During the previous phase and because of the political division, the Lebanese state was unable to make a decisive decision regarding the military confrontation, but it did enter into a security confrontation with the terrorist cells,” Sayyed Nasrallah highlighted.

Meanwhile, the Resistance Leader uncovered some aspects of the Lebanese political scene upon dealing with the terrorist groups.

“Due to political divisions, the Lebanese state was unable to take a decisive decision to launch a military confrontation.”

However, His Eminence added:

” To be fair, the Lebanese state was engaged in a clear security confrontation with the terrorist cells and networks. The army, General Security and State Security scored very important achievements.”

He also unveiled that “there was information that Daesh [Arabic Acronym for the terrorist “ISIS”/”ISIL” group] was preparing to occupy two Lebanese towns.”

In this context, His Eminence went on to say “It is clear that terrorism was strongly reactivated with the beginning of spring and that the next summer will be a serious one.”

“When the victory was achieved in Arsal outskirts, the Americans sent the Lebanese state a message of anger. When the Lebanese state decided that the brave Lebanese army would liberate the remaining outskirts, the Americans returned and asked the Lebanese officials not to carry out this operation and threatened to cut off military aid to Lebanon,” Sayyed Nasrallah detailed.

Praising the sacrifices of the Lebanese army in defending and liberating the eastern borders, Hezbollah Secretary General stressed: “The Lebanese army and its leadership have done a great job and political confidence must be enhanced by the army’s ability to conduct accurate operations.”

However, he reiterated that Hezbollah had no problem if the Lebanese state decided to liberate Arsal’s outskirts in July.

“The Lebanese Army Command was ready to do the mission but there was political hesitation. So, we decided to head to liberate Arsal’s outskirts. The hesitation was not due to insufficient army capabilities but rather for political considerations veiled as humanitarian considerations. Meanwhile, the state’s decision to launch Operation Dawn of the Outskirts was a very significant development and represented a form of practicing a sovereign political decision.”

Sayyed Nasrallah viewed that

“the 2nd liberation is one of the achievements of the new presidential term represented by President Michel Aoun, the man whom I always described a brave, independent leader who does not bow or submit to any state, embassy, pressures or intimidation. President Aoun preserved the state’s prestige through taking a sovereign Lebanese decision to launch the border operation.”

He also thanked the Syrian leadership for its efforts in accomplishing this liberation, particularly that it bore embarrassment in sake of Lebanon.

On this level, he uncovered that he met with Syrian President Bashar al-Assad in Damascus to over the deal with Daesh to uncover the fate of kidnapped Lebanese Army soldiers.

“I headed to meet President Bashar Assad in Levant and asked him for a settlement to move Daesh militants with the aim of unveiling the fate of the kidnapped servicemen,” Sayyed Nasrallah said .

Meanwhile, he urged the Lebanese state to take a sovereign decision to liberate occupied territories from “Israeli” occupation.

“We are waiting for another sovereign decision because there is Lebanese territory still under the “Israeli” occupation, the Shebaa farms and Kafrshuba hills. We call on the Lebanese state to plan for its liberation by a sovereign decision,” His Eminence said.

He further urged the Lebanese officials to take a sovereign decision to coordinate with Syria because this is a solution for us and we must hurry in this away from Western pressure

Sayyed Nasrallah also thanked the people and the government of the Islamic Republic for their continuous support to the resistance, Syria and Iraq. “I Congratulate Iraq for the liberation of Tal Afar and announcing Nineveh province free from terrorists.”On another level, Sayyed Nasrallah explained that “Israel” was disturbed by the liberation of the outskirts. “”Israel” is concerned by the coordination on both fronts and the performance of the Lebanese and Syrian armies. “Israel” is crying its orphans in Syria,” he said.

Sayyed Nasrallah also praised and thanked the Lebanese and Iranian Foreign Ministries’ efforts to block suggested major amendments to the mandate of UN peacekeepers in Lebanon following Wednesday evening’s vote at the Security Council.

“The British-American scheme sought to modify the UNIFIL’s mission in sake of “Israel” and to tighten the noose on Hezbollah,” he warned.

To the people in Bekaa, Sayyed Nasrallah sent a clear message:

“These borders and outskirts are the responsibility of the Lebanese army, and we never said that it’s our responsibility. Your eastern border with Syria is now under Army’s control. You must come together so that you mend your internal relations.”

Moving to the international scene, His Eminence also described the United States as the real threat to the international community, warning that the policies of the administration of President Donald Trump vis-à-vis North Korea were steering the world towards a nuclear war.

“We must know that the other scheme in the region is being toppled, and that the American-“Israeli” dreams that were built on Daesh and its sisters are falling apart. The world must know that Lebanon is protected and anyone who thinks of attacking its territory will have his hand cut off, thanks to the golden equation,” he concluded.

Source: Al-Ahed news 

Resistance Finds in Qalmoun Dangerous Video Revealing ISIL Intention to Attack Lebanese Towns

August 31, 2017


Hezbollah Military Media Center announced that while combing ISIL ex-posts in the outskirts of western Qalamoun, the mujahidin found an SD memory card in a wallet forgotten by one of ISIL terrorists before they left the area.

After examining the SD memory card, it ended up to include a video which shows one of ISIL commanders explaining his plan to attack and occupy Ras Baalbek and Al-Qaa towns in northeastern Lebanon.

In cooperation with the Lebanese and the Syrian armies, Hezbollah launched a major offensive against ISIL terrorists in Lebanon-Syria border outskirts, defeating them and eradicating all the plots.

Related Videos

  تيار المستقبل وعلماء “السنة” في لبنان وحزب الله “المخادع

Iraqi “14 March Movement”



Related Articles


Europe Frustrates Israeli-US Attempts to Amend UNIFIL Mission in Southern Lebanon

 August 24, 2017

The United Nations Security Council

The Israeli-US efforts to amend the UN Security Council Resolution 1701, which has been the reference of the UNIFIL troops mission in southern Lebanon since 2006, war are doomed to failure as they face a categorical rejection expressed by the European diplomats.

In this context, France’s deputy U.N. ambassador Anne Guegen rejected amending the mission of UNIFIL troops, and her stance represented also that of Germany, Spain, Sweden and other European countries whose armies have contributed to the UNIFIL force.

The Zionist Ambassador to the UN Danny Danon said, during the talks which precede the UNSC resolution to extend the UNIFIL mission for six more months, that ‘Israel’ wants to make major amendments to the mission of the UNIFIL troops, who must, accordingly, intensify monitoring ‘Hezbollah violations’ in the area.

The Zionist media also highlighted the Lebanese civil campaign to plant trees along Lebanon-Palestine in response to Hezbollah Secretary General Sayyed Hasan Nasrallah’s call to challenge Zionist complaints to the UN Security Council in this regard.

The Zionist entity had filed a complaint to the UN Security Council, accusing Hezbollah of utilizing the civil activities to monitor the Zionist movements in the occupied territories.

Source: Al-Manar Website

Related Video

Related Articles

Sayyed Nasrallah: Israeli Enemy Reached Rock Bottom, Game Over in Syria!

Sayyed Nasrallah: Israeli Enemy Reached Rock Bottom, Game Over in Syria!

Marwa Haidar

Hezbollah Secretary General Sayyed Hasan Nasrallah stressed that the Israeli enemy has reached the rock bottom as it fears the Lebanese resistance’s growing power.

Addressing crowds in a ceremony marking the eleventh anniversary of the Divine Victory in 2006 July War, Sayyed Nasrallah said the game is now over in Syria, calling on some Lebanese sides who have been betting on the fall of the Syrian to quit on this idea.

Hezollah S.G. said that the US is launching a campaign of intimidation against the Lebanese government and people through bundle of sanctions against Hezbollah. However, his eminence stressed that such intimidation won’t affect the resistance, its determination and its growing power.

Meanwhile, Sayyed Nasrallah warned that the cost of any new Israeli war on Lebanon will be very high, calling on the Israeli enemy to reconsider dismantling Dimona reactor.

The resistance leader reiterated Hezollah’s will to hand over all posts in Arsal outskirts once the Lebanese army is ready to this move.

Sayyed Nasrallah assured that the victory in the battle between the Lebanese army and ISIL in Ras Baalbek and AL-Qaa outskirts is definite, noting that there is no time limit for this battle.

Heroic Confrontations

Sayyed Nasrallah started his speech by asserting that jubilation witnessed today is by virtue of sacrifices offered by the resistance and its people.

“Our martyrs had sacrificed their souls for us to stay honored and happy. Today they are glad to see us smiling and jubilant.”

Sayyed Nasrallah talked about heroic confrontations that took place against the Israeli enemy in the town of Al-Khyam, especially during July War, stressing that they were part from decisive achievements that led to the divine victory.

His eminence also recalled the historic detention center in Al-Khyam, praising the steadfastness of prisoners who were held by the Israeli occupation there.

“Few Hezbollah fighters managed to defeat a whole Israeli brigade in Al-Khyam (during July war). This is July war equation,” Sayyed Nasrallah said.

“The sample which Israelis had seen during July war, they will see it multiplied by 100 times in any future confrontation on all levels,” the resistance leader warned, stressing that the disgrace inflicted on the occupation soldiers during 2006 war will be more.

Growing Power

Sayyed Nasrallah said despite that eleven years have passed on July war, but it is still in the Israeli conscience, and that the Israeli enemy is still studying this war and looking deep into its lessons.

“July war’s goal was to crush Hezbollah, but since that time the Israeli enemy has been talking about Hezbollah’s growing power, and this is an acknowledgment that the war had failed to reach its goal.”

Sayyed Nasrallah noted then that the resistance in Lebanon works honestly in order to reach strategic goals, stressing that it does not seek personal and narrow interests.

“The resistance’s power is growing every day and this is what both enemy and friend know and say.”

Very High Cost

Hezbollah S.G. warned that the cost of any future war will be very high, noting that the resistance’s power deters the Israeli enemy from launching a new aggression.

“Any new war, whatever its goals were, does not worth the cost which the Israeli enemy will pay.”

His eminence noted that the principle of “survival of the fittest” prevails in the world nowadays, stressing that Israeli enemy respects Hezbollah because of its strength.

His eminence voiced satisfaction that Haifa ammonia tank is being emptied, calling on the Zionist regime to reconsider dismantling Dimona reactor because “it is more dangerous.”

Sayyed Nasrallah meanwhile, noted that the Zionist entity bets on the US administration to press Lebanon over Hezbollah, after failing to defeat the resistance movement, referring to new sanctions Washington will impose on Hezbollah in September.

His eminence said that such moves aimed at intimidating Hezbollah, Lebanese government and people, stressing that such move won’t affect the resistance’s determination and attempts to boost its abilities.

Sayyed Nasrallah hit back at US President Donald Trump’s remarks on Hezbollah during a joint press conference with Lebanese Prime Minister Saad Al-Hariri, stressing that US and ‘Israel’ are both terrorists.

“The US created ISIL and Hezbollah has been fighting terrorism. Hezbollah is part of the resistance which has foiled the ‘Greater Israel’ scheme, along with the ‘New Middle East’ scheme.”

“We have to be powerful; the era when the Israeli enemy can threaten and carry out is over.”

Israeli Enemy Frightened

Sayyed Nasrallah said that the Israeli enemy is frightened nowadays from any move he sees it suspicious at the border Between Lebanon the occupied Palestinian territories.

His eminence said the Zionist regime fears tree planting at the border, calling on the residents of the southern towns in Lebanon to go ahead with tree planting. In this context, Sayyed Nasrallah stressed that such fear indicates the low morale of the Israelis.

“The Israeli enemy has reached the rock bottom, while we have reached the peak,” Sayyed Nasrallah said.


Source: Al-Mana

Related Videos


Related Articles

هل مَن يجيب على أسئلة هادئة موجّهة لكتلة المستقبل؟

هل مَن يجيب على أسئلة هادئة موجّهة لكتلة المستقبل؟

ناصر قنديل

يوليو 26, 2017

– صدر بيانان لكتلة المستقبل عن معارك جرود عرسال. وهذا يعكس الإصرار من جانب الكتلة وكاتب بياناتها على إثارة قضايا أو فتح معارك يراها وتراها الكتلة مصيرية، وحيث إنّ البيان الأول اقتصر على الاتهامات وقد أعادها الثاني، وحيث لا مبرّر للخوض في سجال اتهامي يرغبه بعض من في الكتلة لاستحضار مظلومية واستعطاف شارع صار غالبه الأعمّ يعيش بفرح انتصارات المقاومة، ولم تعُد تنفع معه محاولات تشويه صورة الحرب ولا أكاذيب الحديث عن ثورة وثوار، فيكفي أخذ عصارة البيان الثاني وما فيها من مواقف سياسية وطروحات لمناقشتها أو طرح أسئلة حولها عسى يوجد مَن يملك في الكتلة، التي نفترض نيتها إثارة نقاش وطني حول ما قالت في بيانها ليوضح ويردّ على الأسئلة إلا إذا كان ما تريده هو فقط استدراج اتهامات كاتهاماتها، لأنّ هذه هي اللعبة المرسومة.

– لا نريد الخوض في المساجلات حول ما قاله البيانان عن تخديم أجندة وأهداف إيرانية افتراضية سبق قول مثلها في حرب تموز وبعدها عن مشاركة حزب الله في سورية وربطها بتحسين وضع تفاوضي لإيران حول ملفها النووي، وانتهى الملف النووي باتفاق لم يقايض بشيء من عناصر قوة ومعارك حزب الله ولم يوقفها، ولم يعتذر أصحاب الاتهامات عن سوء الظنّ ولا زالوا يرونه من حسن الفطن أو الفتن. ولا نريد الخوض في سؤال موازٍ للاتهام بأجندة أجنبية بالقول إنه إذا كانت إيران تقف وراء قرار حزب الله، وإيران لا تقاتل في المجرّات بل لها خصوم يتصدّرهم الأميركي و»الإسرائيلي»، فهل تنتبهون لمعنى وضع الأقدام في حلف قضيته المواجهة مع إيران ولحساب مَن إذن أنتم تقاتلون؟ ولا حتى السؤال عن رفة قلب لبناني لدماء لبنانية تعصم لبنان من خطر إرهاب، طالما الجفن لم يرفّ يوم احتشد مئات الآلاف يطالبون بصيغة شراكة في الحكم صارت مستسهلة ومقبولة بعد السابع من أيار، ومثلها صار العماد ميشال عون رئيساً مقبولاً بعدما قيل فيه نثراً وشعراً ما لم يقلْهُ مالك في الخمرة.

– سنكتفي بسؤالين منهجيين هادئين، يتصلان بمقترح الكتلة نشر قوات اليونيفيل في الجرود وسائر الحدود بين لبنان وسورية، والسؤال الأول كيف سيتمّ ذلك من دون تحرير الشق اللبناني من الجرود من وجود داعش والنصرة؟ ومَن سيقوم بذلك، ما دام الجيش اللبناني ليس مجهّزاً لخوض مثل هذه الحرب ويحتاج دعماً جوياً وتنسيقاً برياً مع الجيش الواقف قبالته على الضفة الأخرى من مناطق يحتلها الإرهاب، هو الجيش السوري؟ فهل المقترح بنشر القوات الدولية هو بعد أن ينتهي حزب الله قتاله أم قبل؟ وإنْ كان بعد فلماذا الحملة على خوضه الحرب إذن، وإنْ كان قبل فهل تقترحون التنازل عن جزء من الأرض اللبنانية للإرهاب وتسييجها باليونيفيل؟

– السؤال الثاني يتصل بالطابع القانوني للمقترح، فنشر قوات اليونيفيل يستدعي قراراً يصدر عن مجلس الأمن الدولي، ولنفترض أنّ المقترح هو بنشر اليونيفيل بعد تحرير الأراضي اللبنانية من الإرهابيين، فالسؤال هو طالما نتحدّث عن حدود بين دولتين هما لبنان وسورية، فالقرار الأممي يجب أن يصدر برضاهما وقبولهما، فهل هذه دعوة لتفاوض بين الحكومتين اللبنانية والسورية حول المشروع؟ وهذا ترفضونه طبعاً، ولكن لو سلّمنا أنكم تفكرون بذلك، ماذا لو رفضت الحكومة السورية؟ وهذا شبه أكيد، إنْ لم يكن في حكم المؤكد، ماذا تصير قيمة المقترح إلا على طريقة الحديث عن زواج ابن جحا من بنت الملك وقطع نصف الطريق طالما جحا وزوجته وابنه موافقين، اللهم إلا إذا كان المُراد قراراً وفقاً للفصل السابع. وهذا يعني وضع البلدين المعنيين تحت الفصل السابع ونزع سيادتهما وإلزامهما بالقرار. فهل هذا هو المشروع القديم الجديد منذ حرب تموز، فلماذا لم يرد في البيان؟ ويبقى السؤال حتى لو كانت هذه هي النيات، هل ثمة أفق لها بعدما فشلت قبل عشرة أعوام والتوازنات لم تكن على ما هي عليه الآن، وأنتم الأعلم أنّ الفيتو المزدوج ينتظر كلّ فصل سابع في مجلس الأمن؟

– هل مِن مجيب بغير الشتائم؟

(Visited 768 times, 768 visits today)
Related Videos

Related Articles

%d bloggers like this: