Elor Azaria and the Myth of Jewish Universal Values

March 04, 2017  /  Gilad Atzmon

Gilad Atzmon interviewed by Alimuddin Usmani for La Pravda and E&R

Alimuddin Usmani: IDF soldier Elor Azaria was convicted of manslaughter for shooting dead a  wounded Palestinian. The case deeply divided Israel. Many Israelis said he was just doing his duty and was scapegoated by the army. On the other hand, a military spokesperson said“This is not the IDF, these are not the values of the IDF and these are not the values of the Jewish people”. Gideon Lévy called the 18 month sentence “a sentence fit for a bicycle thief”.

What are your comments on this case?

Gilad Atzmon: A lot of issues are at stake here. Azaria was obviously a cold-blooded murderer who shot a wounded Palestinian in the head. Basically, he committed an execution in broad daylight.  From an Israeli perspective, Azaria’s main crime was being caught on camera. Yet, the circumstances in which he operated were pretty impossible. These Israeli soldiers are deployed in policing tasks. They, the occupiers, are engaged in conflict with the indigenous people of the land. It is a recipe for disaster. More often than not, Israeli soldiers and police forces end up operating as execution squads. Yet, these vile practices do not necessarily reflect any official military order. Instead, they bring to light the atmosphere within the Israeli street: the PRE-traumatic stress, the impunity to kill, the lack of any ethical sense and so on.

Putting aside Azaria’s brutal act, the court case exposed a deep conflict within Israeli society. Zionism, as we know, promised to make the Jews ‘people like other people.’ Yet, the reality on the ground suggests that Israelis have to spend a lot of time and energy concealing the fact that they actually share very little with other people, if anything at all.

Azaria was found guilty of manslaughter, which is surprising considering the clear evidence of 1st degree murder. Yet he was sentenced to just 18 months in prison.  The explanation of this discrepancy between the court’s verdict and the light sentence can be understood on more than one level.

Military courts, as opposed to civilian courts, are not committed to any notion of ethics but rather to the needs of the military system. For instance, a military court sentencing a soldier to death at daybreak is not guided by the seeking of justice but by the needs of the system. It attempts to deter other soldiers from insubordination, cowardice or defection.    

Similarly, because Israel needs the IDF to sustain the occupation, Israel must make sure that its soldiers are confident that the system will always eventually stand by them even if they are  caught in an unfortunate situation such as shooting a wounded Palestinian in the head.

On the day of the verdict, veteran chief of staff Moshe Yaalon, admitted that his initial and harsh reaction to the Azaria incident was because there was an immediate need to calm the situation on the ground. He basically had to throw something at the Palestinians, hoping to prevent mass protest and possible escalation. But at the end of the day, Israel wants the Palestinians to know that any form of resistance will be met with by radical and unpredictable measures.

This leads us to the notion of Jewish values in general and the IDF’s moral values in particular. As I have said many times before, there are no Jewish universal values. Judaism and Jewish culture are tribally-oriented. Moreover, Judaism is guided by Torah and Mitzvoth (commandments). Accordingly, the Jew is expected to follow rules rather than forming ethical judgments. Haskalah, the Jewish enlightenment, was an attempt to universalize Judaism by mimicking European secular thinking. Thus, those universal values that were introduced by Haskalah are not Jewish, but simply borrowed by the Jews from their host nations.

Zionism was a promise to civilise the Jews by means of ‘homecoming.’ It implicitly accepted that Jews weren’t people like all other people, but it believed they could be. Zionism promised to make the Jews productive, to gravitate towards labour and farming. The IDF was supposed to be a humane and ethical military force.  I grew up with photos of Israeli soldiers giving their own water to Egyptian POWs in the desert (1967). It took a few years before I learned that in fact, the Sinai desert was a slaughter zone for thousands of Egyptian soldiers who were sent to their deaths in the burning sand. It took a few more years before I became aware of the Nakba horror – the brutal ethnic cleansing of the Palestinian population in 1948. Just 3 years after the liberation of Auschwitz the young Israeli army, together with Jewish paramilitary forces, massacred dozens of  Palestinian villages. I assume I don’t have to go into details of current Israeli war crimes.  To sum it up,  the IDF as never been a moral army. IDF moral values are a myth. What we have instead is a growing record of crimes against humanity.  The facade of the military trial was, in practice, an attempt to convey the image of ethical thinking. After all, ‘by way of deception’ must be a kosher procedure.

Alimuddin Usmani: The Jewish Telegraphic Agency wrote that Socialist primary winner in France, Benoit Hamon, had the backing of prominent anti-semites. Before the vote, Dieudonné and Alain Soral called for Manuel Valls to be knocked out of the race and Valls, known for his zealous support of Israel, did indeed receive a slap in the face.

What do these things reveal about the mood of French people?

Gilad Atzmon: It isn’t just France. We detect a global fatigue with Jewish politics and lobbying. We see it in Britain and in the USA – and Jews are the first to notice it. Jewish organisations have long been complaining about the rapid growth in ‘antisemitic’ incidents (whatever that means). Yet, instead of engaging in some elementary self-reflection, asking themselves what is it about them and their behaviour that brings such anger and opposition, these organisations manage to repeat the same mistakes over and over again. Instead of opening the discussion on Israel and Jewish power, they use every means at their disposal to suppress freedom of speech and to silence legitimate criticism of Jewish ID politics, global Zionism and the brutality of the Jewish state.

One would think that, after the Shoah, Jews would learn the necessary lessons and would go out of their way to conceal Jewish arrogance. But In practice, the complete opposite has happened. The Jewish lobbies, both Zionists and ‘antis,’ are more obnoxious and arrogant than ever.

 

Alimuddin Usmani: CRIF defines itself as the political representation and official mouthpiece of the organized Jewish community. In the FAQ on it’s website we find this question : Does CRIF have an influence on French politics? 

And the answer is:

Yes, CRIF influences French politics by defending its vision of what should be the public policy against racism and anti-Semitism, offering its thoughts on the transmission of the memory of the Holocaust, or defending its idea of the peace in the Middle East.

In summary, CRIF acts exactly like any other association concerned by the public interest.   

What do you think of this answer?

Gilad Atzmon: I believe that it is a valid answer as long as French people are willing to accept that one minority group that just happens to be privileged can dominate the discourse on public matters such as racism, French past and foreign affairs. But Jewish history actually teaches us that these celebrations of Jewish power always come to a tragic end.

 

Alimuddin Usmani: On CNN, Bernard-Henri Lévy wrote that the Trump administration has a problem with Jews.

How do you explain that BHL is so worried about Trump?

Gilad Atzmon: It is simple. BHL realises that, considering his intensive bellicosity and war-mongering, he himself is a serious Jewish problem. Zionism was all about a promised land yet global Zionism, for which BHL is a prime conduit, signals the transformation from a ‘promised land’ into a ‘promised planet.’ It is, in fact, immoral interventionists such as BHL who bring disasters on the Jews.

When BHL accuses Trump, the first American Jewish President, of antisemitsm, he may be providing us with a glimpse into his own sense of guilt. It is a last and desperate attempt to prevent the floodlight from exposing the criminal continuum between Israel and the Ziocon wars spreading around our planet.

Alimuddin Usmani: Recently you gave concerts and talks in Czech Republic. You announced that you will be back there in June. What do you like about this country?

Gilad Atzmon: pretty much everything. It is a country that has managed to sustain its culture, its work ethic, its cuisine, its productivity. It is a country that is living in peace with its past and sees a prospect of a future ahead.

BHL, the Ukraine and the Russian bear (priceless!)

February 16, 2017

Related Videos

برنارد هنري ليفي: أيّها اليهود… اِحذروا ترامب!

يناير 28, 2017

ترجمة: ليلى زيدان عبد الخالق

نشرت صحيفة «نيويورك تايمز» الأميركية تقريراً لـ«غُراب الثورات»، اليهوديّ برنارد هنري ليفي جاء فيه:

منذ أسابيع قليلة فقط، كان يهود الولايات المتحدة الأميركية و«إسرائيل» يشعرون بأنهم تعرّضوا للخيانة من قِبل باراك أوباما. وذلك بسبب السماح لمجلس الأمن التابع للأمم المتحدة بتمرير قرار يدين الاستيطان «الإسرائيلي»، والذي سمح الرئيس المنتهية ولايته بإقراره على حساب اليهود أنفسهم. غير أنّ الخطر الذي يواجه يهود «إسرائيل» والولايات المتحدة اليوم، وكذلك اليهود في بلدان أخرى، لا بدّ لهم أن يحملوه لفترة طويلة من الآن، إذ يبدو أنهم سيتعوّدون على تلقّي الخيانة في المستقبل، وهذه المرّة من الرئيس الأميركي دونالد ترامب.

يمكن لأحدهم الاعتراض على هذا الحكم المسبق على ترامب، الذي قدّم إلى الآن أدلّة وافرة على حُسن نيّته. فعلى سبيل المثال، عندما عمد إلى تسمية أحد أصدقاء «إسرائيل» للعمل كسفير، واعداً بنقل السفارة من «تل أبيب» إلى القدس، مستعيناً بصره زوج ابنته، جلريد كوشنر، اليهودي الأرثوذوكسي، و«حفيد ناجٍ من المحرقة»، لتقديم المشورة له في شأن سير علمية السلام في البيت الأبيض. ألا تشكل هذه خطوات حاسمة تدعو إلى طمأنة اليهود الذين يؤيدون «إسرائيل»؟ نعم ولا.

هناك قانون يحكم العلاقات بين اليهود وباقي العالم. وقد شُكّل هذا القانون أثناء محاكمة أدولف إيخمان، وذلك حين انتقد المفكّر اليهودي العظيم غيرشوم شوليم، حنة أرندت واتّهمها بالتقصير في مساندة الشعب «الإسرائيلي» ـ مُظهرةً حبّاً غير كافٍ للشعب اليهودي. هو عينه الحبّ المطلوب من الرئيس الأميركي للتعاطي مع قضايا «إسرائيل».

في مثل هذه الظروف، وعلى عكس تلك التي تتوافر في الظروف الحياتية الاعتيادية، يؤكد هذا القانون أن التظاهرات الودّية أو السلمية ـ وللمفارقة ـ لا تُؤتي بالكثير. وتحدّد أيضاً من أن التفاتات الصداقة، حين لا تنبع من أعماق القلب لا تُبنى على حبّ صادق وخالص ـ ولهذا، أخيراً، واستناداً إلى معرفة حقيقية للحبّ ـ تتحوّل التفاتات الحبّ هذه إلى نقيضها ـ في نهاية المطاف.

ولتوضيح المغزى أكثر فأكثر، نحن لا نستطيع أن نحكم ما إذا كانت سلسلة الإشارات التي أطلقها ترامب ناحية «إسرائيل»، ستكون لها تبعات شريرة سواء على المديين القصير أو البعيد.

وقد تعتبر هذه الإشارات، على سبيل المثال، تعزيزاً لهامش قُصر النظر، وبالتالي، قد تشكّل بعداً انتحارياً في السياسة «الإسرائيلية». قد يرسلون إشارة خاطئة إلى أولئك الذي سيُظهرون سعادة كبيرة عند رؤية الولايات المتحدة تعكس النموذج أحاديّ القرارات غير القابلة للنقاش، وبالتالي، فتح الآفاق للقوى الأخرى كي تعرض بطولاتها. وقد يتبدّى ذلك في الولايات المتحدة على شكل احتضان فائق لليهود المؤيّدين لـ«إسرائيل»، ضدّ الرئاسات المتقلّبة ومنها واحدٌ على الأقلّ غيّر رأيه وفقاً لمصالح صفقاته الشخصية ، أحد هؤلاء الرؤساء الذين لا يتمتعون بشعبية كبيرة بين الأميركيين، بسبب دعمه المتراجع للقضايا «الإسرائيلية»، التي يمكن أن تشكّل خطراً على إجماع الحزبين الجمهوري والديمقراطي، التي قدّمت الكثير من الدعم والتأييد لـ«إسرائيل» على مدى عقود من الزمن.

لا يمكنني الادّعاء بأنني أدرك ما يجول في خاطر دونالد ترامب أو حتى في كيفية تحرّك عواطف قلبه في ما يتعلّق بالالتزام الصادق مع الدولة اليهودية. لكن، من المؤكد أننا نستطيع الاستدلال على مثل هذه المؤشرات بالعودة إلى سنوات عدّة مضت.

وأحدها يعود إلى جون أودونيل، وهو الرئيس التنفيذي السابق لكازينو آتلانتا سيتي الذي يملكه ترامب، الذي ذكر في كتابه الصادر عام 1991 بعنوان «Trumped» قول ترامب نفسه: «أفضل الناس الذين أودّ أن أحصي أموالي معهم كلّ يوم هم أولئك اليهود الذي يرتدون القلنسوات القصيرة». وفي الآونة الأخيرة، برزت عبر «تويتر»، عاصفة من التغريدات اليائسة، لإثبات أنه الأكثر ذكاءً والأكثر قدرة على المراوغة حتى مع جون ستيوارت نفسه.

ثمّ، وفي غمرة انغماسه بحملته الانتخابية، كان هناك لقاءٌ حيث توجه ترامب إلى المانحين من أعضاء الائتلاف الجمهوري اليهودي: «إنّي أدرك جيداً، لمَ لن تقوموا بدعمي! فقط لأنني لا أريد مالكم». وتدلّل هذه العبارات على احتقار معيّن، على أقلّ تقدير. وإذا ما أردنا أن نكون أكثر دقةً، فإن هذه المجموعة تعكس ازدراءً معيّناً، ويمكن تفسير ذلك ـ وفقاً لفرويد ـ على أنه أحد ميكانزمات الدفاع الاستباقية للأنا، ضدّ ازدراء مفترض من الطرف الآخر. بغضّ النظر عمّا إذا كان هذا الازدراء حقيقيّاً أو متخيّلاً.

وسواء كان جون ستيوارت أو الجهات اليهودية المانحة تزدري هذا المهرّج ذا الشعر اللامع، وكذلك أمواله، وممتلكاته بما فيها برج ترامب الشهير، فمن الواضح أن المسألة غير مرتبطة بكلّ هذا. فالأمر الأساس الذي يعتقد ترامب أنهم سيقومون به، يرتبط في نظرته الكاريكاتورية لليهود، بحسب ما ذكرت «نيويورك تايمز»، من أنه رجل استعراضيّ بامتياز، فضلاً عن أنه مبتذل.

إن هذا لمثالٌ رائع للدفاع عن النفس من الازدراء المفترض الذي لطالما أظهره حيال معاداة السامية، ومع بروز اليهود مرّة أخرى، كممثلين لنخبة كبيرة تعمل ضدّه وأحياناً تؤيده، نراه الآن في موقع السلطة والقوّة، ويسعى ببساطة إلى الانتقام.

يذكّرني هذا بإحدى قصص التلمود التي تفسّر هذا السياق المنطقي خير تفسير.

إنها تلك القصة ـ جزءٌ من التاريخ المنقّح للحاخام اليهودي ناسيا إحدى شخصيات الفكر اليهودي في القرن الثالث ميلادي. أدار هذا الحاخام مدرسةً، كان يمرّ بها يومياً أحد الشبان من مربّي الخنازير. ولم يوفّر تلاميذ هذه المدرسة الأذكياء المليئة رؤوسهم بالعلم والمعرفة، هذا الشاب الراعي وأصرّوا دوماً على التندّر على حاله والسخرية منها.

وبعد مرور سنوات عدّة، استُدعي هذا الحاخام إلى مدينة بعيدة تحت حكم القيصر، وذلك للمثول أمام القيصر الروماني ديوكلتيانوس. يبدو أن هذا القيصر كان شديد التقدير لضيفه. فقد أرسل إليه أحد أهمّ سفرائه آمراً بتوفير حمّام فاخر لضيفه لتطهير نفسه بعد رحلته الطويلة المرهقة.

غير أن ديوكلتيانوس أرسل سفيره أيضاً يوم الجمعة، ليطلب من الحاخام السفر نهار السبت منتهكاً بذلك أهم الوصايا عند اليهود، كما أمر القيصر بتسخين الماء حتى درجة الغليان كي يحترق الحاخام من شدّة حرارتها، لكن ملاكاً أنقذه في اللحظة الأخيرة بعدما عمل على تبريد المياه.

وعندما مثل الحاخام أمام الإمبراطور ديوكلتيانوس، تعرّف إلى راعي الماشية السابق الذي قال له: «هل تعتقد أنه بإمكانك ازدراء الإمبراطور، لمجرّد أن ربّك يستطيع القيام بالمعجزات؟».

تعمّدتُ ذكر هذه القصة لأنها توفر استعارة جيدة للغرب في الوقت الحالي، حيث الحال الآن، كما كان في روما في العصر القديم، انتصارٌ للعدمية حيث يمكن لأيّ كان، حتى مربّي الخنازير أن يصبح إمبراطوراً.

إنه لمثالٌ جيد، أيضاً، على الحكمة اليهودية التي تستجيب للوضع وفقاً للتالي: «كان لدينا ازدراءٌ واضح لديوكلتيانوس، راعي الخنازير، كما أننا مستعدّون الآن لتقديم كلّ التبجيل والتقدير لهذا الراعي ـ الإمبراطور، الذي وكما فعل شاوول، قبل أن يصير ملكاً، كان سائساً للحمير ـ فأصابته النبوّة، وارتفع في منصبه وأصبح رجلاً جديداً».

وفوق هذا كلّه، إنها أسطورة جيدة، ترمز إلى التفاضل بين حدّين، أو إذا صحّ التعبير، إلى التفاح المسموم من ناحية، والمقدّم من قبل الراعي المُهان، والتوّاق إلى الانتقام، كما برز عند جون ستيوارت وزملائه اليهود، الذين يظهرون أذكى ممّا نعتقد. وفي مواجهة هذه الحالة، ما من شيء ـ بالنسبة إليّ ـ يستحقّ الاهتمام أكثر من قدرتنا على الحفاظ على قدرٍ من المسافة.

وكغيرهم من المواطنين الأميركيين، فعلى اليهود احترام الرئيس المنتخب كما ينصّ على ذلك الدستور. غير أنه من الضروري ألا يقعوا ـ في نهاية المطاف ـ في فخّ الاعتقاد بأن هذا يتعارض مع الفضيلة التي هي وَسَطٌ بين طرفين. عليهم ألّا ينسوا أبداً أنه مهما كان عدد المرّات التي يعلن فيها ترامب عن حبّه وولائه لـ«إسرائيل»، من بنيامين نتنياهو أو أيّ أحد غيره، سيبقى ترامب ذلك الراعي السيّئ الذي يحترم القوّة فقط، والمال والقصور الفاخرة، بينما لا يلقي بالاً للمعجزات، أو حتى لإمكانية دراسة نموّ القطاع الاستخباري في ضوء التقاليد اليهودية.

أخيراً، عليهم أيضاً أن يدركوا جيداً، أنه في مثل هذه الفترة، التي وُصفت بالشعبوية، بسبب عدم القدرة على صوغ مصطلح أفضل، إبان فترة الانتخابات الأميركية، لا تجسّد سوى أعراض إنما على مقاسات كبيرة في وقت يُهاجَم الفكر من كلّ حدب وصوب، لتزدهر الأكاذيب المتغطرسة المشوبة بالثقة بالنفس، بشكل لم يسبق له مثيل. وفي ظلّ هذه الثقافة السياسية الجديدة المهيمنة حالياً على كوكبنا، يتقدّم أحد الأثرياء الأميركيين من أحد أبناء عمومته ـ أي الأقلية الروسية ـ يتقدّم رعاة الخنازير بتوجيه صفعة مدوية غير خجلة أو آبهة بشيء، بل مهدّمة للقصور الإمبراطورية، لن يبقى لـ«الأمة اليهودية» أيّ دور يمكنها أن تلعبه.

وفي سبيل التحالف مع هذا النوع من «الشعبوية»، ستكون دعوة إلى خيانة «إسرائيل».

إن الاستسلام لديوكلتيانوس يشكّل في حدّ ذاته خيانةً للذات.

(Visited 184 times, 11 visits today)

The Anglo-Zionist nemesis – a nihilist pact with the losing side of history ?

The Saker

September 15, 2016

by Paul Matthews

It is in the Book of Proverbs (16:18) of the Hebrew Bible that we may find the locution : Pride comes before a fall. The following report chronicles and contextualizes events and chapters in the saga of a post WWII world under an improvident leadership of Uncle Sam and argues that there is always a good reason to hope even in a period of undiminished gloom. As the freak show of the US presidential election unfolds in the self-reflected glare of the mainstream press and TV, the signs are that partisans of the Zionist Power bloc have finally met their match in the ‘odd couple’ of Vladimir and Bashar.

The heroic struggle of the Syrians commands respect. Bearing in mind the need to avoid the pitfall of idolatry, nobody in their right mind would query the force of character or moral authority of Iran’s Supreme Leader, ‘living martyr’ Ali Khamenei and his Lebanese protegé, Hezbollah’s General Secretary Hassan Nasrallah. They are assuredly the spiritual guides of their respective peoples. Yet outside their nations they would seem to lack the undoubted charisma of the Russian and Syrian heads of state who figuratively and, in the latter’s case, physically, stand head and shoulders above their peers,

One has to be destitute of vision not to see through NATO’s Partnership for Peace initiative by whose obscurantist credentials politicians are provided with a licence to kill ‘extra judicially’ on behalf of the central banking system ie those ‘ finance houses, debt merchants and investment banks’ that seek to straitjacket, downsize, enslave humanity and plunder the planet in tune with their ideological mix of zombie economics and voodoo capitalism.

A fatal combination of Jewish hubris and American exceptionalism has left the Chosen People and their Gentile friends in high places ill-prepared to counter the immense popularity and esteem which these two statesmen and their countrymen have earned for themselves, notably in the eyes of so many ordinary US and EU citizens. By contrast, as agents of the militaro-industrial complex of a military alliance visibly in decline, the lying politicians and media anchors supportive of Zion have reached a level of ignominy beneath contempt. This narrative proceeds in several phases …

Artificers of the Axis of Evil – for whom, like Leo Strauss, «deception is the norm in political life» …

‘Let them eat precaution ?’ A recipe for social darwinism, corporate malfeasance, global terrorism by Paul Matthews … 6108 Views July 25, 2016

Comments 

Readers may be familiar with the above article. It showed how special interest groups exercise their lobbying power by usurping the functions of the judiciary and hijacking the prestige attached to the Nobel Prize system to promote activities detrimental to humanity and world peace. The forces thereby unleashed implement what are essentially odious policies of the central banking system that seeks to mould or anaesthetise public opinion, paralyse dissent and induce a popular sense of fatalism : telling us that, for example, while the Diary of Anne Frank is apparently acknowledged by experts to be a scientifically proven forgery, one can be accused – on a trumped up charge – of antisemitism and unlawfully prosecuted, fined or sent to prison for saying so in public.

A discriminatory pro-Israel, ‘Jews only’, neoliberal discourse monopolizes the political culture of the USA, its EU client states and other satellites. We learn from Robert Faurisson that Elie Wiesel and Simon Wiesenthal heartily detested one another and that the latter was as big a storyteller as the former. Tom Segev, a biographer of Simon Wiesenthal, explains how Wiesel, Wiesenthal and the Klarsfeld family competed with one another for public attention. Bickering among the divas is part of the act. Notoreity and celebrity are assets to ensure that the spotlight seldom wavers from the business of driving home the message concerning Jewish victimhood and to distract us from considering more fundamental subjects affecting negatively a much wider public interest.

Characterised in August 2003 by Justin Raimondo as an ‘intellectual street-walker’, hyper-sophist Ilana Mercer, née Isaacson, in her March 2003 article “The Jewish Connection” argues deceptively that GW Bush’s ‘vision’ for US intervention in the Middle East was in place before September 11, 2001 and that he was not ‘snookered into his power-hungry, messianic mania by a Jewish coterie’. She conveniently belittles the rôle of the 1997 ‘think tank’ Project for a New American Century (PNAC) and another 1996 ‘study group’ led by Richard Perle. It produced for Benjamin Netanyahu – the then Prime Minister of Israel – the seminal ‘policy document’ A Clean Break : A New Strategy for Securing the Realm. (q.v.) She similarly overlooks the existence of an even earlier Jewish Israeli blueprint for regional – prior to global – hegemony : the 1982 Oded Yinon Plan (q.v.).

It would also have been less disingenuous for her to admit to the formative influence and opportunism of a piece in the September 1990 issue of The Atlantic Magazine from the ‘orientalist’ and leading Anglo-Zionist, Bernard Lewis. It coins for the first time the expression ‘Islamic fundamentalists’ and popularises the socially divisive term ‘clash of civilizations‘ first used by Albert Camus in 1946. With the end of the Cold War visibly in sight, a newer big business friendly leadership model was required to (a) sustain the existence of an otherwise defunct NATO war machine and to (b) protect Israel. Fiercely opposed by Edward Said – a ‘public intellectual and pioneer of the study of post-colonialism’ – the gung ho British-American historian who is a ‘specialist’ in imperialist ‘oriental studies’ – and his pupil Samuel P Huntington – provide the wherewithal to fill the vacuum created by the collapse of the USSR even as the back room boys are busy concocting their new ‘Pearl Harbour’.

Why the river of Gentile blood from Pol Pot to ISIS never dried within a depotic ‘Free World’ matrix

«The ultimate cause of evil lies in the interaction of two human factors: (1) normal human ignorance and weakness and (2) the existence and action of a statistically small (4-8 per cent of the general population) but extremely active group of psychologically deviant individuals. The ignorance of the existence of such psychological differences is the first criterion of ponerogenesis. That is, such ignorance creates an opening whereby such individuals can act undetected». Political Ponerology Andrzej Łobaczewski (1921-2008) http://www.ponerology.com/evil_2b.html

In theology, ponerology (from Greek ponéros, πονηρός, “evil”) is the study of evil. It is related to the word “ponos” πόνος, which means pain. Political ponerology is an interdisciplinary study of issues connected with the genesis of evil on a macro-social level primarily associated with Polish psychiatrist Andrzej Łobaczewski. He was one of the founders of this anthropological discipline utilising data from psychology, sociology, history and philosophy to account for such phenomena as aggressive war, ethnic cleansing, genocide and despotism.

A test case for the scholarly scrutiny of evil genius is to be found in the ghastly example set by the exceedingly influential German born American diplomat and political scientist Henry Kissinger, né Heinz Alfred Kissinger. Despite the academic aura the 1973 Nobel Peace Prize winner has skilfully cultivated over the years, this is the ‘US peacemaker-cum-serial killer’ who, as US National Security Adviser (1969-1975) and US Secretary of State (1973-1977), oversaw the escalation of the socio-ecocidal Operation Ranch Hand (1962-1971) on the farmland acres and forests of Vietnam, Laos and Cambodia, the coordination of the twenty-two long years of Operación Cóndor/Operação Condor (1968-1980) in Latin America and of Operation Menu-Freedom Deal (1969-1973) when the US Strategic Air Command’s B52s dropped the equivalent of five Hiroshimas on rural Cambodia.

Highlights of the post 19th century concept of total war include the dropping of the uranium-based Little Boy and the plutonium-based Fat Man respectively on Hiroshima and Nagasaki – with the latter device wiping out most of Japan’s rather small Christian community – and the firebombing of Dresden, Hamburg and Tokyo.

Again featuring the massive use of napalm, under the aegis of the United Nations, the carpet bombing of North Korea destroyed an estimated 75 per cent of the urban centres and killed 20 per cent of the civilian population.

Hiroshima and Nagasaki cast a long shadow and without the Jews and their collective psychosis the design and manufacture of the Manhattan Project would probably have been impossible. In the wake of Suez, the 1956 Protocol of Sèvres awarded the Jewish state the wherewithal to build its own nuclear arsenal. Conveniently the ever contrite Germany offered Israel the means of an offshore nuclear second strike capability. The first two of the Dolphin class submersibles (Dolphin and Leviathan) were fully donated by Chancellor Helmut Kohl and the third (Tekumah) received a 50 per cent subsidy. A submarine-launched cruise missile (SLCM) tipped with a 200-kilogramme nuclear warhead containing up to 6 kilogrammes of plutonium provides an argument which reinforces significantly the type of pressure that previously was applied by a mere accusation of ‘antisemitism’.

SLCMs have a range of at least 1,500 km, bringing them within spitting distance of Western Asia, Southern Europe and North Africa. In 2010 a former Professor of Jerusalem’s Hebrew University brought this unpleasant truth home to Europeans. Dutch-born Doctor Martin Van Creveld, a world specialist in low-intensity wars, then suggested that were Europe to oppose the transfer of Palestinians from Gaza and the West Bank, in order to survive Tel Aviv would be forced to destroy the European capitals with nuclear weapons, it being decided that EU member states would be unable to retaliate without annihilating their ‘Palestinian friends’. He added that, while in 2008, only 7 or 8 per cent of Israelis were of the opinion that the mass transfer of Arabs would be the best solution, two years later, according to a Gallup poll, the figure was 44 per cent. The radical swing to the extreme right in Israel is confirmed by Netanyahu’s March 2015 re-election. Already in 2014, a former speaker of the Knesset, Moshe Feiglin was unhesitatingly proposing to expel the Palestinians from Gaza into the Sinai.

He who pays the piper calls the tune. But no-one wants to face the music. Élitist ‘deep state security’ politics is about puppeteers projecting power via proxy wars and an utter disregard for human life orchestrated worldwide by the likes of BHL, Bernard Kouchner and all their friends in high places. Zionist Power Configuration people need ISIS and won’t see their brainchild easily defeated. No one is exempted from whatever violence ensues to serve solely the central banking system’s core interests. Evil afflicts believers and non-believers alike. Be they Buddhists, Moslems, Christians, Jews. devotees of other folk, traditional, shamanist, natural belief systems.

How Syria’s ‘weakest link’ survived to become a pillar of strength towering over his enemies 

«Absolutely nothing predestined this – shy in temperament – doctor (he trained as an ophthalmologist in St Mary’s Hospital, Marylebone, London NDLR) to face, twenty years later, the united forces of what in the 1940s went under the incomplete term of “global or international Jewry” (in reality Zionism) and its influential Arab allies from the Persian Gulf, at the head of a very modest ‘Third World’ army and, at the moment. its survival is due to a fragile set of strategic alliances with China, Iran and Russia. The man at the head of a small country called the weakest link, finds herself unwillingly, struggling with the same formidable forces that sparked the great 1914-1918 slaughter and triggered the Second World War of 1939 -1945. Strange fate». Translated from : Le maillon le plus faible … 2518 vues 08 août 2016 11 commentaires Avec photographie du Capitaine Bashar Al-Assad (deuxième à partir de la droite) en 1994.http://reseauinternational.net/le-maillon-le-plus-faible/https://strategika51.com/2016/08/06/le-maillon-le-plus-faible/.

Purportedly the oligarchy’s strategists always go for the jugular and that implies seeking out the weak spots in any adversary’s defence mechanisms. In the recent article published with the title Le maillon le plus faible (Cf. supra) one can observe the photo of a tall and gangling 29 year-old Capitain Bashar Al-Assad taken in 1994, at about the time of the death in a car crash of his elder brother Bassel and six years before his father’s death in 2000, when he took over the reins of power and started timidly to reform, then resist with tenacity as Damascus became the target of moves to destabilise his country and unseat him. These took the form of US-led sanctions and a bid to smear first the Syrian president, then Hezbollah and Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, by trying to implicate them in the 14 February 2005 murder of Rafic Hariri and 22 other people near the St. George Hotel in Beirut.

Given the retracted testimony, the flimsy, doctored evidence and the would be internationally sponsored UN inquiry thoroughly discredited by bias, Thierry Meyssan in his 29 November 2010 article, first published in Odnako, (q.v.) argues convincingly the case for the involvement of Mossad and Germany. A scenario becoming even clearer when one poses the question cui bono ? regarding the assassination of the former, Saudi friendly, Lebanese premier. The answer comes swiftly on the heels the inquisitor, with the so-called Cedar Revolution, an anti-Syrian alliance, resulting in the complete withdrawal of Syrian troops from Lebanon on 27 April 2005.

Successive attempts have been made to tighten the noose around the neck of all elements friendly to Iran or the Shias – starting with the Arab Socialist Ba’ath Party in Syria and the region’s other two, multi-confessional cum secular, non-aligned nations, namely the Lebanese and Iraqi republics – crowned by the London plot hatched in 2009 to overthrow the Syrian government – as testified by France’s former Foreign Affairs Minister, Roland Dumas, invited to join the conspiracy. Syria has been thrown under a bus, just like Saddam Hussein’s Iraq and Muammar Gaddafi’s Libya. Since the invasion by cut throat foreigners of this beautiful land, Bashar Al-Assad’s moral stature has grown – as has his people’s loyalty to their president – for they see lucidly the fate reserved for them by those bankrolling the élites of Israel, Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Qatar, Turkey, France, Britain and the USA.

Like the Syrians, the Russians are under no illusions. Their situation is best summed up by a Russian born Jew who reportedly converted to Orthodox Christianity and writes under the alias, or pen name, of Israel Shamir :

«The DNC 2016 reminded me of The Triumph of the Will, the paradigmatic film of Leni Riefenstahl. Thefiery oration of “four-star general of the Marine Corps” General (retired) Allen, ready to kick ass of the Russkies, flag-waving, hysterical rhythmical shouts Uoo-eS-Ay, runaway aggressiveness, military pomp and above all exceptionalism of “America is great because America is good”; the United States as an “indispensable, transformational power in the world,” the poisonous mix of Uber Alles and Manifest Destiny fits like a glove to the matrix established at the 1934 Nazi Party rally in Nuremberg, Germany. There similarity ends : the Demo version is all for the bankers and against the workers, while the Nazis called themselves “the workers party” and spoke against financial capital. The Nazis said they were for the family and the majority, the Dems say they do not care for workers’ votes, as they have enough votes from feminists and queers. And the Jews are now for, rather than against. The Jewish news agency JTA described General (ret) Allen fire-breathing delivery as “the Jewish moment at DNC … to further reassure the security hawks in the Jewish community” as he promised that “our armed forces will be stronger”. Bill Clinton came with a button saying Hillary in Hebrew, mobilising the Jewish community for Clinton and war […]

In words of Jeffrey Sachs, “Hillary is the candidate of Wall Street. Even more dangerous, though, is that she is the candidate of the military-industrial complex supporting every war demanded by the US deep security state run by the military and the CIA.” And now she and her party set their sights on Russia. The Russians have no say in this decision: they were formally appointed to the high post of The Enemy of the Empire, and this appointment requires no agreement of the victim. Why were the Russians chosen? Who else fits the bill ? The US war machine needs an enemy, and the world is not that large. Europe is subdued and occupied. China is too big, India is too soft, the Arabs are too small. Japan was fitted for an enemy in early Nineties, but surrendered. Putin perfectly understood the US war machine’s search for an enemy when he proposed to Americans at the UN they fight the Islamic State together with Russia. This nefarious Islamic State remains a possibility that will have to do, meanwhile, but for a greater and more serious enemy, able to attract nice budgets, Russia suits best. Russia has an additional charm: it is a successor state to the USSR, that was the designated enemy for the West for a long time, until 1991. Thus it is a traditional enemy. Hillary as a Goldwater Girl supported the most warlike Russia-hating candidate, and apparently she still remembers the thrill. It is true that Russia’s enemy status had been explained by the satanic nature of godless communism, and this explanation is as dead as a dodo, but explanations are not reasons, they are secondary rhetorical devices. The reason is the need for an enemy so the war budget will grow nicely and keep generals and weapon manufacturers in the lifestyle they are accustomed to…». The Reluctant Enemy by Israel Adam Shamir 4 August 2016http://www.unz.com/ishamir/the-unwilling-enemy/ /// http://plumenclume.org/blog/146-l-ennemi-malgre-lui.

Megalomaniac Zbigniew Brzezinski spoke in April 2016 of realigning the global power architecture

Not everyone enjoys the privilege of being a ‘Reluctant Enemy’. A mother of battles rages in Aleppo where lists of casualties mount. The Saker community is conscious of the sacrifices forced on and already made by Syrians and their allies. Blowback time for the EU from the Syrian and Ukrainian theatres proceeds apace with not a whisper from official media outlets whose soporific editorial line alternates with the need to maximize fear or panic and create the impression that violence is spiralling out of control. Kiev’s gunmen sought to infiltrate Crimea. Terrorists in NATO’s other spheres of influence get a free or helping hand from private ‘national’ state security services, working jointly with, or under the command of, Mossad’s sayanim. Europeans and Americans must pull up their socks if the “shaitans” (شياطين demons) and their Israeli handlers are to be rooted out chez eux.

‘Red in tooth and claw’, a stalemated EU-US combo snatches defeat from the jaws of victory

«… We need to have some sense that Assad is on the way out. There can be a transition ; but it needs to be clear that he is not part of Syria’s future. Until that happens – until that begins – until there is acknowledgement of that transition – we are going to have Syrians dying – continuing to die. Because many of them are trying to reclaim their country, for the good of Syria’s future, but many of them want Syria to be the safe haven for terrorists. So I don’t know whether or not Syria can be put back together again … ». WORLD NEWS | ASPEN INSTITUTE | Friday July 29, 2016 10:10pm EDT CIA chief Brennan not optimistic about Syria’s future as one country : http://www.reuters.com/article/us-mideast-crisis-syria-cia-idUSKCN1092PV?Il=0.

“Assad must go”. The same old tune. The senior American government official’s lietmotif – in a keynote speech at Washington’s Aspen Security Forum in late July 2016 – echo hasbara spouted in March earlier this year by academic James Stavridis, a retired four-star US Navy admiral and former NATO supreme allied commander.

To the effect that, like Humpty Dumpty in the children’s nursery rhyme, the odds of putting Syria back together again – as a functioning entity – appear low enough to consider partitioning the country once and for all. Lies.

On the contrary, what has been an Israeli wet dream since the 1982 Oded Yinon Plan is as far from coming to pass as the bid to erase Palestine from the collective memory of Arab speakers, be they Christian or Muslim.

Summer 2016 climaxed with state sponsored terrorism spilling over from Ukraine, Afghanistan, the Middle East and Asia Minor onto the streets of France, as tidings from trigger happy Police State America peppered the dystopian narrative and the airwaves were congested with a ludicrous manufactured outcry over the ‘burkini’.

With the memory of the dead in Nice – some decapitated – fresh in their minds, French people learn of the grisly murder during the July 2016 Aleppo offensive of a 12 year old Palestinian child Abdullah Tayseer Al Issa by a US backed Nour al-Din al-Zinki Movement. The current trail of some Israeli, but mostly Arab, blood spilled in a Jewish ‘power projection’ exercise is traceable to the death by fire of three members of the Dawabsheh family when their home in the West Bank village of Duma was torched by Jews in July 2015 and to the extrajudicial killing of 18 year old Hadeel al-Hashlamoun by the IDF at an army checkpoint in Hebron in September 2015.

In neighbouring Syria and Lebanon, resistance to the messianic “Hatikvah” agenda comes at a fearful cost in human and environmental terms of people slain and wounded, livelihoods and infrastructure wrecked. However politically and militarily, informational warfare is the key. The war for hearts and minds has been lost from the

Maghreb to the Mashreq. Obscene wealth concentration rots Europe’s, Israel’s and the USA’s social fabric.

So the protracted effort to enforce this ideological mantra of removing from office the Syrian republic’s legally elected president reminds us of the paradigm of the immovable object confronted with an allegedly unstoppable force – itself a paradox. To the extent that instead of beholding just a badly fractured and mutilated Syria, public opinion glimpses the diabolically flawed and irremediably fissured Atlanticist edifice. Le ver est dans le fruit.

Joe Biden demands from Serbia an allegiance to NATO that is offensive to all self respecting Serbs. To pacify ‘a disruptive citizenry’ Britain’s security forces suppress anti-fracking protests while, over the Channel, depleted of the means to police thousands of migrants endangering the lives of road hauliers, Calais resembles a war zone.

All’s grist to the mill when sowing discord and fomenting strife to enslave and spoliate others. Heeding history’s lessons means acknowledging the racially driven mindset of a mainly Ashkenazi intelligentsia, whose ‘culture’, ‘inventiveness’ and ‘social skills’ reflect the merciless chauvinism rooted in Jewish supremacism and Talmudic vengeance that fathered both Bolshevism and the tribal enterprise of Zion. In Syria the jury’s still out as pundits scratch their heads over Recep Erdoğan’s game. The world’s fate hangs in the balance and France’s finest legal minds discuss the pros and cons of banning modesty from the beach. For more news from the French banana republic, tune in to Panamza and Egalité et Renconciliation online – des mines d’or d’information subversive.

In the face of death threats both websites depict honestly a slice of life ‘beyond the pale’, ‘outside the bubble’ ‘scripted’ for us by a certifiable, criminally insane, terrorist minority culpable of a violent and suffocatingly long foreign occupation of Arab lands and attacks on the dignity and safety of defenceless civilians the world over.

Mammonism, Brexit and The Rest of Us

July 01, 2016  /  Gilad Atzmon

Gilad Atzmon interviewed by Alimuddin Usmani

Alimuddin Usmani: Following the victory speech by Nigel Farage, you wrote on your Facebook wall: “It is easy to grasp why British workers support Farage and not the Labour Party.”

 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MlN9o3g-yuA

 Can you explain this further?

Gilad Atzmon: Farage’s ideas are coherent and consistent. They reflect the feelings of the poor, the oppressed and the working people who have been reduced into a workless class. Whether Farage can help them is an open question but he offers a clear vision of change fuelled by nostalgic glory and a strong sense of belonging.

Corbyn, on the other hand, has little to offer although this is not entirely his fault. The Labour philosophy is full of contradictions and holes. On the one hand, Corbyn and Labour claim to represent the worker and the poor. But Corbyn and his party also subscribe to cultural Marxist and cosmopolitan ideas that advocate immigration, diversity, identitarian politics and various measures of ‘correctness.’  One cannot support the worker while simultaneously advocating immigration that puts local jobs at risk.

In the aftermath of Brexit, Farage talked directly to British workers about a new future and the prospects for renewal of manufacturing and housing. At the same time, Corbyn was holding forth in support of refugees and against racism. Important topics; but not immediately relevant to those out of work.

The next question is why this contradiction is embedded in Labour and Left politics. The Labour Party is:

1. dominated by Jewish cosmopolitan ideology; and

2. funded by Jewish oligarchs.

The Jewish Left is pro immigration, pro identitarian politics, pro LGBT and so on. Jews realize that when things turn sour, it is the working class that turns against the Jews. This causes them to feel threatened by a cohesive working class. They prefer the working class to be broken into an endless number of different sectarian and identity groups. Jews would prefer society to be seen as a manifold of tribes and synagogues. That way the Jews are just one tribe amongst many. It is the Jewish Left that taught us that ‘the personal is political.’ These are the same people that trained us to talk ‘as a’: ‘as a black,’ ‘as a Muslim,’ ‘as a gay, ‘as a Jew’ and so on.   They have succeeded in dividing us.

Farage offered the Brits an opportunity to re-unite and think once again as Brits. At least 52% of the Brits bought into his call. His support included the vast majority of nonurban Brits who were apparently impervious to the Labour party’s contradictory position.

Alimuddin Usmani: Bernard-Henry Lévy labeled Brexit a strange defeat. He wrote that Brexit was a victory not of the people but of populism. 

How would you respond to him?

 To read BHL on Brexit click here

Gilad Atzmon: BHL’s post Brexit rant provides a window into Jewish fear and we should thank him for his willingness to share it with us.

To BHL true democracy, patriotism, nationalism, a united working class, manufacturing, coherence and truth are all symptoms of the Goyim’s resistance and must be suppressed.

BHL’s new evil Goyim are: Donald Trump, Putin and Nigel Farage whom he has now formally united with the Le Pens as the Hitlers of our time.

BHL’s rant attempts to conceal the fact that the Brits who oppose the EU are expressing frustration with mammonism.

Mammonism is a type of capitalism that is driven by financial transactions such as trade, banking and stock exchanges instead of by manufacturing. It is the exploitive capitalist agenda manipulated by the large financial institutions like Goldman Sachs and the financial speculators like Soros.

Brexit was effectively a vote against mammonism, against the banksters in the City and the global economy that left the worker with no prospect of a future. But the Brits who voted leave will probably not achieve what they intended. Boris Johnson, Michael Gove and Liam Fox who led the leave campaign are themselves servants of the Jewish Lobby and the global mammonites. Brexit was an attempt to divert examination from the City and its oligarchs and focus blame on Brussels. BHL is working hard to prolong this concealment project. He is suffocating us with his shallow liberal ideas and empty jargon and hoping to turn the goyim against themselves.

BHL, the pro war Zionist neocon who bears direct responsibility for the destruction of the lives of millions of Muslims, doesn’t like popular movements such as the Italian 5 Star or Podemos in Spain. He wants to keep the Goyim in the dark and let Soros’ ‘Open Society Institute’ fund their fake opposition.

“It is the victory of the mob of Fritz Lang’s Metropolis,” BHL writes. By ‘mob’ the Jewish ‘philosopher’ means hard working Goyim — people who transcend sectarian politics in a search for unity. BHL should be clever enough to understand that such a craving ‘to be one’ was the driving force behind the Scottish referendum and the leave victory for Brexit. The cultural Marxist divisive agenda seems to have backfired.

In his rant, BHL can’t hide his goy hatred. He claims that half of the Brits who voted to leave the EU are “wreckers and dimwitted leftists, … drunken skinheads and hooligans, … illiterate rebels and bull-headed neo-nationalists.” Not exactly a flattering image delivered by the Jerusalemite thinker.

It has been established that the Jewish so called ‘intelligentsia’ claims credit for the enlightenment. BHL repeatedly follows that pattern. He claims to preach enlightenment values. In truth, Jewish thinkers contributed very little, if anything, to the enlightenment. Spinoza, the only Jew considered to be a prominent enlightening figure was excommunicated by his fellow Jews for being too enlightened. The Jewish so-called enlightenment (Haskalah) didn’t leave a single universal text. It basically taught Jews how to mimic the Goyim in the street while remaining Jews in their dwellings (be a Jew in your tent and a man on the street.)

If the enlightenment was actually the anthropocentric shift that led to the construction of popular individualism and is responsible for the birth of mass greed and consumerism, one would expect a ‘philosopher’ to grasp the growing disillusion with this endeavor. But BHL is not really a philosopher; he is a ‘Jewish philosopher.’ He specializes in populist pseudo intellectual harangue made up of an arbitrary collection of sound bites. Rather than producing enlightening content, BHL produces jargon. No one exhibits better than BHL that distinct dichotomy between Jerusalem and Athens. They are like oil and water. They can never mix. Accordingly a Jewish philosopher could be seen as a contradiction in terms. And indeed, those very few Jews who produced philosophy with universal values (Christ, Spinoza, Weininger and just a few others) are those who ended up in open dissent with their tribe.

Alimuddin Usmani: Alain Minc, French political advisor and author, born to a family of Jewish immigrants from Poland, wrote that Brexit is the victory of poorly educated people against well-educated people. 

http://www.marianne.net/alain-minc-brexit-c-est-victoire-gens-peu-formes-les-gens-eduques-100244028.html

 What is your opinion?

Gilad Atzmon: It is true that there was a demographic, socioeconomic, age and education split between the remain and leave supporters. In general, the rich voted to remain and the poor wanted to leave.  The same was said about young and old. Some statistics point to an educational difference between the two sides. It is understandable that people who are less educated and likely to be limited to manual work would be the first to be affected by the collapse of manufacturing. It would be they who may see Brussels and the global economy as their enemy.

But here is the problem. Even if our society is partitioned by a cognitive barrier, the role of the ethical being is to care for the less able and less educated. Our duty is to make sure that all of us can earn a living and have a roof above our heads. I cannot see Labour and Corbyn with their Guardian supporters and Jewish funders leading such a move. In fact they didn’t. The Tories appear not to be aware that there is a problem.

Nigel Farage has unleashed a demon in Britain. But the movement extends beyond Britain or even Europe. The popularity of Trump, Sanders, NF and E&R (France) suggest that we are witnessing a global awareness of mammonism.

I also want to mention that the impression that all ‘leave’ supporters are less developed or educated is condescending and delusional. The Brexit debate revealed that some of the leave advocates were amongst the most sophisticated thinkers around. Many of them see the EU as a tool of the oligarchy and they are correct. They see leaving the EU as just the first step. The battle against mammonism is the big war ahead.

Alimuddin Usmani: An article published in Mondoweiss suggests that Israel should be deeply disturbed by the Brexit vote.

 http://mondoweiss.net/2016/06/should-disturbed-brexit/

 David Cameron and Tony Blair, true friends of Israel, have been shaken by Brexit. Do you think that Brexit could harm Israeli interests?

Gilad Atzmon: Not in the short run. The leading Brexiters are prominent British sabbos goyim. Fox, Gove and Johnson are servants of the Jewish lobby. However, in the long run Israel and Jews should be very worried. The Brexit is a clear sign of mammonism fatigue. When the Brits and the French and the Greeks and the Americans identify that their destruction is connected to Goldman Sachs, Soros and the Jewish Lobby we will see developments that could lead to global aggression on a catastrophic scale. We had been there more than once. I would have loved to avoid it if it had been possible.

 

The Weekly Sabbos Goy Award Goes to Michael Gove (must watch)

March 30, 2016  /  Gilad Atzmon

The Zio-con Who Bought Disaster to Libya is Doing it Again

March 25, 2016  /  Gilad Atzmon

 

By Gilad Atzmon

Bernard-Henri Lévy (BHL), the ultra Zionist who declared that ‘as a Jew’ he liberated Libya, is again campaigning for more immoral interventionist wars. He insists that the current terror in Europe comes from Syria and Iraq. His solution- let’s drop more bombs on Muslim and Arab cities- as if we haven’t been doing just that for decades.  I would expect nothing less from a Hasbra merchant, but why does the BBC feature such a clumsy Zio-con, one who is barely able to articulate an idea?

The Jewish so-called ‘philosopher’ tells lies on camera. He argues that the West had washed its hands of Syria’s uprising and didn’t want to intervene. Is that true?  In fact, throughout the war we have identified precisely those militias and the rebels that were working with Israel and the West.

Despite the obvious fact, widely accepted by Western analysts, that Asad and Iran hold the key to stability in the region, BHL continues to campaign against Bashar Assad.

Like his brethren Zionists, BHL also insists upon imposing a false demarcation between the ‘kosher Muslims’ and the ‘bad ones.’  In support, Levy recycles the false Zionist dichotomy between ‘Islam’ and ‘Islamism.’ But there is no such dichotomy. As in Judaism, in Islam there is no separation between the civil and the religious. Yet unlike the Jews, in Islam there is no such thing as a secular Muslim. Jews often drop God but retain their Jewish identity. When a Muslim stops believing in Allah, he or she stops being a Muslim. Thus the delusional dichotomy between Islam and Islamism is nothing but a Jewish projection–an attempt to Zionise the Muslim.

BHL reckons that Europe is dying.  If he is right, he can blame himself and Jewish lobbies that pushed us into so many criminal wars in devastating succession. But I believe that BHL is wrong; Europe will emerge from the present crisis in a stronger position. It will learn to identify its true roots in Athens and will drift away from Jerusalem and the destructive influence exerted by Zionist politics, such as BHL, Lord Cashpoint Levy, LFI, CFI and The Crif.

%d bloggers like this: