قوى الطوائف مع دولة مدنية في لبنان The forces of sects with a civil state in Lebanon

أكتوبر 30, 2019

د.وفيق إبراهيم

يطغى شعار الدولة المدنية على كل الشعارات الأخرى في المرحلة الحالية في لبنان، متحكماً بالسنة السياسيين وقادة الأحزاب بشكل مذهل يدعو الى طرح سؤال وحيد، اذا كانت كل هذه القوى مع الدولة المدنية، فأين هي أحزاب النظام الطائفي المسيطر على البلاد منذ 1948 ؟

وكيف استطاع هذا النظام الصمود بمذهبيته العميقة، فيما تؤيد كل مكوناته مدنية الدولة؟

هنا تكمن إحدى المعجزات الكبيرة التي لا يفهمها إلا السياسيون اللبنانيون المتمكنون إلى حدود الاحتراف في تقديم صور متعددة لانتماءاتهم السياسية. فهل هناك مثيل للوزير السابق وليد جنبلاط الذي يترأس حزباً مذهبياً وإقطاعيا ومناطقياً وتقدمياً واشتراكياً وأخيراً مؤيداً للدولة المدنية!

أما رئيس حزب القوات السيد سمير جعجع فابتدأ حياته الاحترافية قائداً في حزب فجر حرباً طائفية استمرت حتى تسعينات القرن الماضي، مستفيداً من دعم إسرائيلي للبنان، أيدته القوات الجعجعية وشاركت فيه بالمزيد من اقتراف المجازر الطائفية.

وهذا ينطبق على جميع أحزاب لبنان العاملة ضمن إطار النظام السياسي مقابل أحزاب وطنية ويسارية وقومية تؤمن بالدولة المدنية ولم تنتم يوماً إلى مؤسسات النظام.

لقد وصل هذا التلفيق إلى حدود القوى الدينية، التي تعلن تأييدها للحراك الشعبي فهل تؤيد حقاً الدولة المدنية؟

علينا أولاً الإشارة إلى أن الدولة المدنية تقوم على فصل التأثير الديني عن تفاعلات السياسة وحصره في إطار خاص به يعتبر أن الدين وسيلة للعبادة وليس للسيطرة السياسية.

هذا ما فعلته اوروبا واميركا واليابان والصين وروسيا، وبلدان أخرى كثيرة.

لذلك فإن الدولة الفرنسية مثلاً ألغت التقسيم الطائفي للسلطة بين الكاثوليك والبروتستانت وجعلت من الانتماء الوطني المفتوح قاعدة للدمج الاجتماعي بالمساواة الكاملة لمواطنيها في الحقوق السياسية والاجتماعية والاقتصادية، وعلى اساس الوطنية والكفاءة، وبذلك اعادت الدين الى مواقعه في الكنائس مع حصر دوره في العبادات، حتى أن الزواج الفرنسي الزامي في البلديات، حتى يصبح شرعياً.

ونحت معظم دول العالم على الطريقة نفسها لكن الدين في العالم العربي والاسلامي يجري استخدامه وسيلة للتحشيد وتشكيل العصبيات السياسية فالوهابية في السعودية اداة لضبط السكان في طاعة آل سعود، ومفتي الأزهر أقوى مؤيدي كل نظام مصري جديد.

ان احوال القوى الدينية متشابهة في العالم الاسلامي ومهمتها الوحيدة تطويع الناس لخدمة المسؤولين السياسيين.

أما لبنان فبالغ في طائفية نظامه السياسي نظراً لتعددية المذاهب والاديان فيه. ففيما يحرص الدستور في مصر والمغرب والجزائر والسودان والاردن على اسلامية الدولة والرئيس، يذهب النظام السياسي اللبناني نحو «مذهبة» رؤساء مؤسساته الدستورية ونوابه ووزرائه والموظفين الاداريين والقضاء والجامعات وكل شيء تقريباً.

وهذا ما ادى الى تجذير الطائفية في لبنان، متيحاً لطبقته السياسية بالهيمنة على كل شيء تقريباً، وهذا حول المواطن متسولاً يبحث عن لقمة عيشه عند المسؤول عن طائفته، حتى أصبحت الطائفية معممة في العلاقات بين اللبنانيين وعلى كل المستويات.

فانتفخت الاحزاب واصبح لكل طائفة احزابها الناطقة باسمها والمستولية على قواها عند كل المكونات ومن دون استثناء.

لقد ادى هذا النمط من العلاقات السياسية الى تراكم اكبر فساد سياسي معروف في دولة بحجم لبنان مستتبعاً سطواً كاملاً على مقدرات البلاد باسلوب علني يحتمي بالتحشيد الطائفي، ما انتج بطالة وتضخماً وافلاساً وعجزاً ويناً عاماً يزيد على المئة وعشرين مليارا دولار في دولة لا يتعدى ناتجها الوطني العشرين ملياراً.

وغابت الكهرباء والمياه وتكدست النفايات واصبح الأمن فئوياً يخضع لسلطة الزعماء الذين اضافوا الى قوتهم ميزة القداسة الدينية.

هذا ما يدفع الى الحيرة في احزاب طائفية تسللت الى قيادة التحرك الشعبي المتواصل وتطالب بدولة مدنية، فهل هي جدية في مطالبتها ام انها تحاول السيطرة على هذا الحراك الشعبي ذي السمتين الجديدتين على لبنان وهما:تبلور شعور طبقي مع اتجاه نحو الاحساس بالوطنية على حساب تراجع هيمنة «المقدس» القامع لمصالح الناس باللعب عن العصبيات الطائفية والمذهبية.

لعل هذا يؤكد أن الاحزاب المحركة للمتظاهرين، تستعمل هذه الاساليب في إطار صراعاتها مع احزاب اخرى ضمن السلطة، لذلك تذهب نحو استغلال انتفاضة اللبنانيين على النظام الطائفي بتبني شعاراتهم حول ضرورة الدولة المدنية.

والدليل أن الحريري يقدم نفسه «بيي السنة» وجنبلاط سلطان الشوف وعالية وجعجع المدافع عن القديسين، وللامانة فإن هذا الوضع يشمل كل احزاب السلطة من دون استثناء. فهل نحن عشية تحول لبنان دولة مدنية؟

يحتاج هذا الأمر الى احزاب سياسية حقيقية تؤمن بمدنية الدولة، هناك الكثير منها خارج السلطة، لذلك فليست بقادرة على تغيير النظام الطائفي.

ان هذاالتغيير يحتاج الى موازنات قوى شعبية لها قياداتها الفعلية والتحرك الاخير هو الحركة الاساسية في رحلة الألف ميل للقضاء على نظام طائفي متلون يستعمل كل الشعارات الديموقراطية الحديثة وهي براء منه، لذلك فإن اللبنانيين ذاهبون نحو بناء دولة مدنية فعلية تحتاج الى قليل من الصبر والكثير من موازين القوى.

Translation By Word 2019

The forces of sects with a civil state in Lebanon

October 30, 2019

Dr. Wafiq Ibrahim

The slogan of the civil state dominates all the other slogans at the current stage in Lebanon, controlling the Sunni politicians and party leaders in a stunning way to ask the only question, if all these forces are with the civil state, where are the parties of the sectarian regime that has controlled the country since 1948?

How has this regime been able to withstand its deep ideology, while all its components support the civil state?

Here lies one of the great miracles that only lebanese politicians who are able to the limits of professionalism understand in providing multiple images of their political affiliations. Is there an instance of former minister Walid Jumblatt, who heads a sectarian, feudal, regional, progressive, socialist and finally a supporter of the civilstate!

The head of the Forces Party, Mr. Samir Geagea, began his professional career as a leader of the Party that blew up a sectarian war that lasted until the 1990s, taking advantage of Israeli support for Lebanon, which was supported by the Geagea forces and participated in more sectarianmassacres.

This applies to all parties in Lebanon operating within the framework of the political system as opposed to national, leftist and nationalist parties that believe in the civil state and have never belonged to the institutions of theregime.

This fabrication has reached the limits of the religious forces, which declare their support for the popular movement. Do you really support the civil state?

First, we should point out that the civil state is based on separating religious influence from the interactions of politics and limiting it to its own framework that considers religion to be a means of worship, not politicalcontrol.

This is what Europe, America, Japan, China, Russia and many other countries havedone.

The French State, for example, abolished the sectarian division of power between Catholics and Protestants and made open national belonging a basis for social integration with the full equality of its citizens in political, social and economic rights, on the basis of patriotism and efficiency, thereby restoring religion. To his positions in the churches with limited his role in worship, so that French marriage is compulsory in the municipalities, until it becomeslegal.

Most of the countries of the world are in the same way, but religion in the Arab and Islamic world is being used as a means of shaping political tensions, Wahhabism in Saudi Arabia is a tool to control the population in obedience to the Al Saud, and the Mufti of Al-Azhar is the strongest supporter of every new Egyptianregime.

The conditions of religious forces are similar in the Islamic world and their sole mission is to recruit people to serve politicalofficials.

Lebanon, on the other hand, has over-sectarianism in its political system because of its multi-confessional and religious system. While the constitution in Egypt, Morocco, Algeria, Sudan and Jordan is keen on the Islamic state and the president, the Lebanese political system goes towards the “gilded” heads of its constitutional institutions, its deputies, its ministers, administrative officials, the judiciary, universities and almosteverything.

This led to the rooting of sectarianism in Lebanon, allowing its political class to dominate almost everything, and this is about the citizen who is seeking a living at the head of his community, until sectarianism became generalized in relations between the Lebanese and at alllevels.

The parties have blown up and each group has its own own parties and has taken over its powers in all components withoutexception.

This type of political relations has led to the accumulation of the biggest known political corruption in a country the size of Lebanon, following a complete robbery of the country’s capabilities in a public way that protects sectarian ism, which has resulted in unemployment, inflation, bankruptcy, deficits and public debt of more than 120 billion dollars in a country that does not exceed Its national product is 20billion.

Electricity and water were absent, waste was piled up and security became a category under the authority of leaders who added to their power the advantage of religiousholiness.

This is what causes confusion in sectarian parties that have infiltrated the leadership of the popular movement and demands a civil state, is it serious in its demand or is it trying to control this popular movement with two new poisons on Lebanon: the crystallization of a class feeling with a trend towards a sense of patriotism at the expense of the decline of hegemony « Al-Maqdis» suppressing the interests of the people by playing about sectarian and sectariantensions.

Perhaps this confirms that the parties driving the demonstrators, use these methods in the context of their conflicts with other parties within the authority, so they go towards exploiting the uprising of the Lebanese on the sectarian system by adopting their slogans about the necessity of a civilstate.

The proof is that Hariri presents himself as “Bay sunnah”, “Jumblat sultan al-Shuf” and Aalay and Geagea, the defender of the saints, and to be honest, this situation includes all parties of power without exception. Are we on the eve of Lebanon’s transformation as a civil state?

This needs real political parties that believe in the civility of the state, there are many of them outside power, so they are not able to change the sectariansystem.

This change needs the budgets of popular forces that have their actual leadership and the last move is the main movement in the journey of a thousand miles to eliminate a sectarian system that uses all the slogans of modern democracy and is innocent of it, so the Lebanese are going towards building a real civil state that needs a little bit of Patience and a lot of powerbalances.

 

نارام سرجون:بعد النصر .. استعدوا لخوض الحرب الأصعب والأقسى؟؟ .. اللحم سيقاتل العظم

“لانعرف حتى اللحظة كيف سيمكننا اجراء عملية فصل الاسلام عن التراث وفصل المسلم عن التراث دون أن نفصل المسلم عن الاسلام …… انها عملية تشبه فصل اللحم عن العظم .. فالتراث المنقول هو لحم الاسلام الذي يحمله هيكل عظمي هو فكر الاسلام .. ولحم التراث مليء بالاسرائيليات والمتناقضات ومليء بالطفيليات وبالعداء للتفكير والمنطق والفلسفة والعقل ..”

تعليق المحرر على المقالة

اتفق مع الكاتب بان الحرب مع مع داعش واخواتها من الحركات الاسلاموية (الوهابية واخوان الشياطين وحزب التحرير الاسلاموي…… الخ الخ) ، تنتهي بانتصار ناجز لا لبس فية، بدون “فصل المسلم عن الثراث المنقول لكني  لا اتفق مع مقولته عن “لحم الاسلام الذي يحمله هيكل عظمي هو فكر الاسلام” لأني ازعم ان الهياكل العظمي التي حملت لنا التراث المنقول ( العنعنة، وتابعه علم الرجال وعلم الناسخ والمنسوخ والاصول والمعلوم من الدين …..) هم  “علماء” و”فقهاء ” السلطان الاموي والعباسي و… و  والعثماني، والازهر وأم القرى وحميع حركات الاسلام السياسي الذين هجروا القران واعتبروا التراث المنقول وحيا ثانيا لا يمكن ان نفهم التنزبل الحكيم بدونه

وهنا لا بد من لفت انتباه الكاتب بان المشكلة لا تقتصر على العقل العربي المسلم فقط وانما العقل العربي “الداعشي” المسلم المسيحي والعلماني والملحد وكل عقل يدعي امتلاك الحقيقة المطلقة ويكفر الآخر

قال تعالى

وَقَالَ الرَّسُولُ يَا رَبِّ إِنَّ قَوْمِي اتَّخَذُوا هَٰذَا الْقُرْآنَ مَهْجُورًا 

وَإِذَا قِيلَ لَهُمُ اتَّبِعُوا مَا أَنزَلَ اللَّهُ قَالُوا بَلْ نَتَّبِعُ مَا أَلْفَيْنَا عَلَيْهِ آبَاءَنَا ۗ أَوَلَوْ كَانَ آبَاؤُهُمْ لَا يَعْقِلُونَ شَيْئًا وَلَا يَهْتَدُونَ

قال تعالى:

قُلْ مَن يَرْزُقُكُم مِّنَ السَّمَاوَاتِ وَالْأَرْضِ ۖ قُلِ اللَّهُ ۖ وَإِنَّا أَوْ إِيَّاكُمْ لَعَلَىٰ هُدًى أَوْ فِي ضَلَالٍ مُّبِينٍ

 [الجزء: ٢٢ | سبأ ٣٤ | الآية: ٢٤]

 في الآية يخبر الله رسوله أن الرزق للمؤمن والمشرك  من الله

وويقول له ان الحقيقة الآنسانية نسبية ولا احد يمتلك الحقيقة المطلقة سوى الله

 : قل يا محمد:  “….. ۖ وَإِنَّا أَوْ إِيَّاكُمْ لَعَلَىٰ هُدًى أَوْ فِي ضَلَالٍ مُّبِينٍ

اي : وانا (محمد) او اياكم (المشركين )

قال (او)  ولم يقل (و)

اي انا او انتم علي هدى

او انا أو انتم على ضلال مبين

هذه رسالة امر الله عزوجل رسوله الاعظم ان يبلغها ليس للمشركين فقط وانما للناس وخصوصا للذين نصبوا انفسهم ناطقين باسمه وباسم نبيه فحددوا من يدخل النار واختصروا الطريق الى الجنة بتلاوة كذا او كذا ووزعوا صكوك الغفران وبوالص التامين النبوي:

الدعوة الى سبيل الله

قال تعالى

ادْعُ إِلَىٰ سَبِيلِ رَبِّكَ بِالْحِكْمَةِ وَالْمَوْعِظَةِ الْحَسَنَةِ ۖ وَجَادِلْهُم بِالَّتِي هِيَ أَحْسَنُ ۚ إِنَّ رَبَّكَ هُوَ أَعْلَمُ بِمَن ضَلَّ عَن سَبِيلِهِ ۖ وَهُوَ أَعْلَمُ بِالْمُهْتَدِينَ

 [الجزء: ١٤ | النحل ١٦ | الآية: ١٢٥]

قال: بالحكمة ولم يقل بالحكمة الحسنه لنفهم ان الحكمه حسنة بالضرورة ولا وجود لحكمة سيئة

وقال: بالموعظة الحسنة لنفهم ان الموعظة قد تكون حسنة وقد تكون سيئة

كلمة (الحسنة) ليست زائدة وليست حشوا

اذا هناك موعظة سيية

والدليل الحاسم هو فضائيات التكفير على اختلاف تلاوينها

وقال: وجادلهم بالتي هي احسن

اي لا تجادلهم بالتي هي اسوأ

اي  الجدال قد يكون سيء وقد يكون حسن وقد يكون احسن

والمطلوب هو الجدال الاحسن

وهل هناك احسن من يتواضع نبي ورسول ومبلغ رسالة لا تنطق عن الهوى فيقول للمشركين:

وانا او اياكم على هدى او في  ضلال مبين؟

وقال

وَلَا تَسْتَوِي الْحَسَنَةُ وَلَا السَّيِّئَةُ ۚ ادْفَعْ بِالَّتِي هِيَ أَحْسَنُ فَإِذَا الَّذِي بَيْنَكَ وَبَيْنَهُ عَدَاوَةٌ كَأَنَّهُ وَلِيٌّ حَمِيمٌ

 [الجزء: ٢٤ | فصلت ٤١ | الآية: ٣٤]

قال ادفع ولم يقل ادفش والدفع هنا لا يعني تسديد الدين

بل يعني الدفاع عن حرية الرأي والتعبير ليس بالسيف والتكفير والاتهام بالنفاق  واقامة الحجة بالتي هي أحسن وأخير ماهو سبيل الله وما هي كلمة الله التي سبقت

قال تعالى

وَلَوْ شَاءَ رَبُّكَ لَجَعَلَ النَّاسَ أُمَّةً وَاحِدَةً ۖ وَلَا يَزَالُونَ مُخْتَلِفِينَ – إِلَّا مَن رَّحِمَ رَبُّكَ ۚ وَلِذَٰلِكَ خَلَقَهُمْ ۗ وَتَمَّتْ كَلِمَةُ رَبِّكَ لَأَمْلَأَنَّ جَهَنَّمَ مِنَ الْجِنَّةِ وَالنَّاسِ أَجْمَعِينَ (119)

 صدق الله العظيم انظر حولك فالناس مختلفين كما اخبرنا الله في تنزيلة الحكيم باستثاء من رحم ربي وهم الانبياء   ،  والرسل، وهو يخبرنا انه خلق الناس أحرار ليختلفوا بارادتهم الحرة، وباختلافهم تمت كلمته التي سبقت. وعلية فحيث يكون النسان حرا تكون كلمة الله هي العليا

Related videos

عن ازمة العقل العربي انصح الكاتب والقراء بقراءة كتب المفكر الاسلامي الدكتور مهندس محمد شحرور ومشاهدة سلسلة المقابلات الرمضانية التالية  – 30 حلقة – حول قرائته المعاصرة للتنزيل الحكيم

=====

نارام سرجون:بعد النصر .. استعدوا لخوض الحرب الأصعب والأقسى؟؟ .. اللحم سيقاتل العظم

وكالة أوقات الشام الإخبار ية

دعونا نتوقف الآن لالتقاط الانفاس ونقول ان هذه الحرب مع التيارات الاسلامية في المنطقة ستنتهي سريعا بانتصار ناجز لالبس فيه .. ولكن على هونكم ياسادة .. فلا تستعجلوا قرع الكؤوس والأنخاب وتبادل التهاني .. ولاتسترخوا .. لأنها فقط احدى جولاتها وهي الجولة الاطول والاقسى والاعنف وستتلوها هدنة طويلة الامد ولكن الحرب سجال ويجب على المنتصر الأن ان لايرقد مسترخيا بل أن يبدأ في الاعداد للحرب القادمة .. وهي الأقسى والأصعب ..

ان منتهى الخيال أن نعتقد أننا خضنا المعركة الأخيرة مع الاسلام السياسي الذي انطلق مع غياب آخر الخلافات وهي الخلافة العثمانية .. وظل الشغل الشاغل للأجيال منذ ذلك اليوم هو اعادة الخلافة أو شبه الخلافة .. لأن العقل الشرقي الاسلامي لايزال مقتنعا أن المؤامرة التي أسقطت الخلافة ستبقى في وجهه لمنع اعادتها وقيامها مجددا .. وعقب كل هزيمة عسكرية وانتهاء جيل من الاسلاميين يقر الجيل اللاحق بأن من سبقوهم أخطأوا التخطيط والتسديد .. ومايجب على الجيل القادم هو تلافي هذه الأخطاء وتطوير التجربة لأن الله سينصر عباده المؤمنين في نهاية المطاف !! .. وهم على موعد مع نصر حتمي قدره الله .. بدليل تعدد نسخ التجارب الجهادية في معظم بلدان المنطقة وكلها تعيد انتاج نفسها وبطرق عنف مختلفة تدل على أنها ليست مأزومة فقط بل مقتنعة تماما ان العنف الداخلي (الذي يسمى جهادا) هو السبيل الوحيد لاعادة الخلافة لأن ماسقط بالحرب لن يعود الا بالحرب .. وليس بالحب .. ولعل أكثر عبارة تدل على أن المعركة انتهت فقط مع هذا الجيل من الاسلاميين وان الجيل اللاحق يستعد هو عبارة يرددها الكثيرون ببراءة وسذاجة مفادها: (هذا الذي رأيناه ليس الاسلام الحقيقي) .. ولكن هذه العبارة هي التي ستشكل الحامل والرافعة للمشروع القادم الذي سيخترع أصحابه نسخة أخرى “حقيقية” جاءت كما ياتي المخلّص .. ويعتبرون ماحدث من هزائم حتى الآن هو جولات وعملية حقن الاسلام بلقاحات متنوعة يتعرض لها الجسم العسكري الاسلامي في سيرته الجهادية الطويلة .. ولذلك فانه من الطبيعي أن يتعرض لطفرات جديدة أو لعملية لقاح بالهزيمة تكسبه مزيدا من المناعة ..

وهنا لاأريد أن يفهم من كلامي انني ارى ان مافعله داعش هو الاسلام الحقيقي لأنني انا فعلا مقتنع أن ماقدمه داعش والنصرة هو برنامج اسلام من قماش تلمودي موسادي ووهابي التطريز .. ولكن العبارة (هذا ليس الاسلام الحقيقي) بحد ذاتها رغم دلالتها الكبيرة على أنها عملية القبول والاعتراف والتسليم بهزيمة المشروع الاسلامي مرحليا فان فكرة الهزيمة النهائية لاتزال غير مقبولة في نظر الاسلاميين بل ينظر اليها لى أن ماحدث مجرد معركة .. مثل معركة (أحد) مثلا لابد ان يتلوها نصر وفتح مبين ..

أبني كلامي واستنتاجي على قاعدة

أن جميع التنظيمات الجهادية اليوم مشتقة من بعضها وهي رغم تفاوتاتها وخلافاتها الفقهية فانها تملك ذات الجذر وذات المراجع الفقهية والرؤية التاريخية والفلسفية فالفرق بين الاخوان المسلمين وداعش يبدو شاسعا في السطح ولكنه في العمق متماه كثيرا من حيث فكرة التكفير والعلاقة مع الأغيار من غير المسلمين أو حتى من المذاهب المنشقة عن مذهب أهل السنة أو حتى المدارس السنية التي تخالفهم الرأي والاجتهاد .. بدليل أن الاخوان المسلمين لايمكن مثلا أن يصدروا بيانا يقولون فيه رأيا يخالف داعش من حيث تكفير الشيعة والدروز والعلويين والمسيحيين وغيرهم .. لأن هؤلاء جميعا كفار في نظر داعش والاخوان المسلمين وجبهة النصرة .. ومافعله داعش فقط أنه وسع دائرة الكفار حتى شملت أهل السنة والجماعة الذين يختلفون عنه .. ولو انه اكتفى بدائرة التكفير الاخوانية التقليدية لما تلعثم الاخوان المسلمون في تأييدهم لخلافة على منهاج النبوة تشبههم ولم يتأتئوا في تعبيرهم عن الانسجام مع أفكارها وبقيت الخلافات الفقهية الأخرى اجتهادات أخطأ فيها الدواعش ولهم فيها أجر واحد فقط لا أجران !!! .. هو ثواب المجتهد ..

وسنكون واقعيين جدا في الاعتراف بأن عملية نزع فتيل الصاعق من القنبلة “الاسلامية” لن تنجح بهذه البساطة لأنهم ببساطة ذخيرة للغرب ورصاص يوجهه الى صدورنا في أية لحظة لأن مفهوم الوطن مغيب لدى الاسلاميين أمام سطوة فكرة الخلافة التي تبتلع الأوطان جميعا وتضعها تحت عباءة خليفة .. فالاسلاميون الوهابيون احتلوا الحجاز ونجد وعطلوا فريضة الجهاد المكي ضد الغرب واسرائيل مما أوقف مليار مسلم عن عملية التطوع لنصرة فلسطين “الا بالدعاء” .. ولكن الغرب أيضا أطلق الاسلام الجهادي ضد الروس والسوفيت وضد الايرانيين وضد البعثيين القوميين العروبيين أيضا في سورية والعراق وضد المقاومة في لبنان ..

أما الاخوان المسلمون فهم النسخة الأخرى للوهابية وهما من ذات فصيلة الزواحف .. والفوارق هي في التكوين والبيئة .. فالوهابيون يشبهون في قسوتهم التماسيح التي تنهش فريستها بوحشية .. أما الاخوان فهم زواحف الدم البارد والأفاعي ذات الجلود الناعمة والتي تحقنك بالسم .. ثم تبتلعك بهدوء .. ولكن كلها زواحف ..

مسؤول “الاخوان” سعيد رمضان مع الرئيس الأمريكي إيزنهاور في البيت الأبيض عام 1953.

وقد جاء الربيع العربي ليثبت أن الاسلاميين على اختلاف مشاربهم ذخيرة عظيمة للغرب لن يساعدنا الغرب على التخلص منها بل سيعيدها الى الحظائر مؤقتا لاجراء صيانة وتزويد خطاباتها بقطع الغيار والملونات والمذاقات التي تخفي خطاب الكراهية ..

ويجب هنا الانتباه الى أن أي محاولة بريئة لاطلاق تيارات اسلامية موازية لامتصاص قوة هذه التيارات وانتزاع الجيل من الانتماء اليها بحجة أن اطلاق الاعتدال سيخفف من التطرف فاننا سنكون واهمين لأن أي خلل في الميزان سيجعل عملية الهجرة الى معسكر التطرف سهلة طالما أن المشتركات الفقهية كثيرة وعملية الانزياح في الاتجاهين واردة جدا وتتبع عوامل متحولة ..

ومانكون قد فعلناه هو اننا هيأنا جيشا رديفا للتطرف سينضم اليه عند أول تلاعب في الخطاب الديني كما حدث اليوم في حرب السنوات السبع عندما كانت المنطقة كلها معتدلة ومضبوطة بفعل العامل القومي الذي ما ان تراجع حتى تسلمت التيارات المتطرفة قيادة جزء من الجماهير المعتدلة بل والجماهير القومية والعلمانية .. لان عملية الانزياح هنا ليست بين دين ودين .. وليست بين مذهبين .. وبين سنة وشيعة .. بل تماه بين اتجاهين في نفس المذهب وعناصر في نفس الاناء ..
وهنا تكمن المعضلة .. لأننا لانريد أن نحاصر الاسلام ولكن في حصارنا للتيارات الفكرية الاسلامية سنجد أننا نبدو وكأننا في مواجهة مع الاسلام وفكر الاسلام وتبدو عملية الفرز والتمييز والفصل مستحيلة بين فكر الاسلام وبين أسلمة الفكر ..
ولذلك فان القطيعة مع الاسلاميين دون التأثير على الاسلام كعنصر هوية للمنطقة وموروث حضاري لايمكن أن تنجح الا بمشروع شامل يبدأ تأثيره من لحظة نزول الوحي في القرن السابع الميلادي وحتى هذه اللحظة .. والحقيقة أننا نقف جميعا حائرين أمام هذه المعضلة في عملية تقطير الاسلام ونزعه من مخالب الحزبية السياسية وتحويله الى كينونة ثقافية مندمجة في مشاريع التطوير الحضاري المتنوعة .. ورغم أن الاسلام الشيعي يعاني من نفس المعضلة الا أنه يبقى في تأثيره محصورا في جزء صغير من الأمة لأن العالم الاسلامي هو عالم سني في غالبيته .. فمهما حدث في الساحة الشيعية فان الهزات الارتدادية التي تصل الى العالم السني ضعيفة نسبيا وتبقى محصورة ..

لاأحد يملك جوابا عن مرحلة مابعد الربيع الاسلامي الأخير .. وكيف سيتم التعامل مع مفرزات هذه المرحلة وأنقاضها الخطيرة ودروسها .. ولانعرف حتى اللحظة كيف سيمكننا اجراء عملية فصل الاسلام عن التراث وفصل المسلم عن التراث دون أن نفصل المسلم عن الاسلام .. انها عملية تشبه فصل اللحم عن العظم .. فالتراث المنقول هو لحم الاسلام الذي يحمله هيكل عظمي هو فكر الاسلام .. ولحم التراث مليء بالاسرائيليات والمتناقضات ومليء بالطفيليات وبالعداء للتفكير والمنطق والفلسفة والعقل ..

اننا أمام عملية هي أصعب من مرحلة الحرب .. وهي استخلاص دروس الحرب التي تقاتل فيها اللحم مع العظم .. لأن الاستنتاجات الخاطئة أخطر مما نتوقع وهي تشبه الهزيمة .. اي خضنا حربا وانتصرنا ولكننا حصلنا على نتائج الهزيمة عندما لم نحول التجربة الى نتيجة وخلاصة .. لذلك يجب اطلاق هجوم معاكس في الحال بالضوء على الظلام .. يبدأ برنامجه في سطور التراث ومن رفوف الكتب وفي عملية التعليم .. ويعمل في قلب المساجد وحلقات الذكر وليس في التلفزيون من بعيد .. ويعتكف المفكرون والتنويريون لايجاد افضل طريقة لتحويل مسار الموجة الاسلامية القادمة على ابنائنا لتكون بردا وسلاما ..

ويجب أن نقوم بتدريس هذه المرحلة من الحرب على سورية بدقة وأمانة في المناهج والاعتراف بكل الأخطاء التي وقعت فيها جميع الأطراف .. ولكن ماهو مهم جدا هو أن يتم تخصيص جهد تأريخي واعلامي متواصل طوال العقدين القادمين لرواية الرواية السورية الوطنية دون انقطاع والاستفادة من جو الهزيمة العسكرية للاسلاميين التكفيريين ومن اعادة اعلام العرب وكلابه الى حظائره .. وأن يكون شرط اعادة العلاقات مع اي دولة عربية ان تعيد تقديم الرواية السورية على حقيقتها في اعلامها وافساح المجال للرواية السورية أن تقدم نفسها لأول مرة من دون تزوير .. لأن الجمهور العربي المغفل لايزال هو ماأنتجته الجزيرة .. فهو باختصار “ضحية” الجزيرة التي أرضعته طوال سبع سنوات ولايزال حليب ثدييها في فمه وفي عروقه .. ويجب أن تغسل أمعاؤه ودماؤه بالماء الصابون ..

ومع هذا فان أفضل علاج برأيي سيكون هو محاصرة و تدمير نموذج الدولة الدينية اليهودية في المنطقة التي قدمت نفسها على أنها الدولة الدينية الأولى ونموذج ملهم للاسلاميين وينظر لها من قبلهم على أنها ثمرة من ثمار سقوط الخلافة .. وأنها مشروع ديني ناجح يمكن تكراره بنسخة اسلامية حتى بطريقة تكوينها العنيفة .. وان اسقاط هذه الثمرة اليهودية لن يكون الا باعادة الخلافة الاسلامية التي أسقطت من أجل تسهيل قيام اسرائيل .. فيعود الاسلاميون كل مرة الى عاصمة عربية يرفعون فيها شعار أن الطريق الى القدس يمر من هنا .ولذلك لاأظن أنه يمكن ايقاف المد الاسلامي الا بايقاف المد اليهودي .. فكلاهما يتلاقحان وبتفاعلان ويتبادلان الخبرات والوجود .. بدليل تكرار تجربة الدولة اليهودية ونموذجها العنيف الارهابي بالتطهير العرقي في تجربة داعش التي كانت نسخة اسلامية عن اسرائيل ..

Related Videos

Obama’s Legacy of Failure

December 19, 2016

by Ghassan Kadi

InObama’s Legacy of Failure his recent article titled “Obama Out Not With a Bang, But a Whimper”, and in his regular eloquent and expressive style, Pepe Escobar nailed it. More need not be said about the Obama legacy, but this man, Obama, has had a personal effect on me, one that I cannot let go of without putting down on paper my own views of his infamous legacy.

I am by no means an expert on all international wheeling and dealing that American administrations do. And speaking of Pepe, I have read with great interest his articles about how the Empire has been involved in different forms of intervention in Brazil, Pepe’s homeland. And to pre-empt comments that will argue that Obama has inherited a huge mess from his White House predecessor, I will take all of those issues on board and “confess” that this article is about the general perception of the Obama legacy from an outsider’s view; especially from a Levantine like myself.

To evaluate Obama, we have to wind back the clock to the time when he put his hand up for the Democratic Party nomination. Is this guy for real? Many, including myself thought. After all, not only he was of African roots (ie black), but his name was not exactly Jesse Jackson or even Martin Luther King. His name was Barack, in fact an Arabic word, which means “bright”, and his surname is Obama; a far cry from Smith. But what is even “worse”, is that his middle name, his father’s “Christian” name was not even Christian; it is the Muslim name Hussein.

That guy, by virtue of his name, not necessarily skin colour, had no chance to lay a foot onto the White House floor, I and many others thought.

History proved all the pundits to be wrong, and admittedly, Obama led a very effective campaign against the Republicans. After two terms of having a moron by the name of George W. Bush (GWB) in the White House, two unfinished and unwinnable wars, a crumbling economy, Americans were ready for a change. The youthful, eloquent, extremely intelligent candidate Obama presented himself to be anything but a part of the “establishment”. With his amazing gift of speech, he won the hearts and minds of not only Americans, but also many overseas.

His “Yes We Can” slogan was very effective to bring home the concept that if Americans unite, they can do what seems to be impossible.

Soon after his inauguration, he was quick to go to Egypt to talk to Arabs, specifically Muslims, to tell them that America was on the verge of taking a new direction in its Middle East policies.

He chose Egypt because despite its position post Camp David agreement with Israel and the peace treaty that followed, despite the fact that for decades after that Egypt was regarded in the eyes of the Muslim World as a “traitor” of the cause, Egypt remained to be the Arab World’s leading country at many levels. Moreover, Egypt houses Al-Azhar University, the most highly acclaimed University for Islamic studies worldwide.

So everything about this young President seemed different, and love him or hate him, even his staunchest of critics regarded him as being such. Even the Nobel Prize committee could not overlook that difference and the hope it brought humanity to the extent that they jumped the gun, rather prematurely as history proved, and rewarded the man with a Nobel Peace Prize.

I must admit that I was one of millions worldwide who hoped that Obama was going to derail the traditional American foreign policies and set them on a new course. Even the very savvy Israeli leaders were worried that he would.

It didn’t take too long however to see that in effect Obama changed his slogan from “Yes We Can” to “No I Cannot”. What is even worse, is that in the not too distant future, his slogan seemed to have change again to “No I Would Not”.

When he finally admitted that he was unable to close down Guantanamo Bay prison, I remained hopeful that he would make a dignified speech and resign. But he did not, and even had the audacity to run for a second term.

Once again, in pre-empting comments that will “defend” Obama and talk about his domestic achievements; Obama Care and the like, I must admit selfishness and proclaim that when it comes to Obama Care, I don’t care. This is not to mean that I do not support proper government-funded health care programs; especially for the underprivileged, but with America being the leading nation of the world, the nation that wants to be the only superpower, its national health program, or lack of it, does not affect the rest of the world; and this is fact. The policies that American administrations undertake, and which interest the world outside the USA, are those pertaining to foreign policies, and nothing else does.

During his first term as President, one could easily observe how his great vision of being “the one” that will save America and the world was gradually and surely eroded.

In fact, a good analysis of Obama’s Cairo speech and what followed it is a clear indication that the only achievement of Obama’s visit to Cairo was to empower the Muslim Brotherhood and give them cover. In effect, his visit was not a formal visit to meet the head of the state (Mubarak). Rather, his meeting was with the opposition, the Muslim Brotherhood, and on their turf, Al-Azhar University, greeting them with “Assalamu Alaikom” (peace be upon you), the traditional Muslim salute. Whilst in effect there is absolutely nothing wrong at all in America opening up to the Muslim World for a change, however the chain of events that followed that speech only indicate that the speech was the first step towards the infamous Arab Spring turned-sectarian, anti-secular pan-Arab series of devastating wars. That speech had many subtle messages, and to think that Obama did not choose his words carefully would be rather impossible to fathom. When he mentioned that he endearingly remembers as a young boy growing up in Indonesia how he listened daily to the Azan (call to Muslim prayer), he was stirring up Muslim emotions, that he knew very well that only fundamentalists would respond to, and can respond to, in the manner that they did. Bluntly, he gave them the green light; “revolt, and I understand you”. That was his version of “Yes We Can” to the Muslim World. The rest is history.

Soon after taking off the “Yes We Can” hat and replacing it with the “No I Would Not” hat, a process that did not take very long at all, Obama stopped worrying about how to be the good President he promised the world to be. So not only he became a part of the “establishment”, but also its face, mouth piece and apparatus.

The irony that followed is that not only he failed to be a good President, but he also failed to be a bad President.

Speaking of bad Presidents, we need a yard stick, a bench mark, and perhaps GWB is that yard stick with a score of 10 out of 10. His “excuse” was his much lower than average IQ, but at least he was good at being a bad President. But Obama could not reach this score either. Perhaps he scores 7 or 8 out of 10.

When GWB decided to go to war, twice, he did. Those were disastrous wars not only for Iraq and Afghanistan but for the rest of the world including America itself, but this is how bad Presidents are made. But when Obama decided to declare war on Libya and Syria, he went there half-hearted. On one hand, he wanted to change regimes, but on the other hand he did not want to invade. And whilst regime change succeeded in Libya, it failed abysmally in Syria and nearly half a million people died as a result.

This is not in any manner, shape or form a criticism for him for not invading Syria, but a criticism of his incompetent, reluctant and spineless character. If anything, I feel extremely delighted that he failed in Syria, and Syria’s inevitable victory is not only the outcome of her resilience and the support of her international friends, especially Russia, but it was also the outcome of Obama’s failure. This win, and American failure with Obama at the helm, will see a whole change in global polarity and the end of the New World Order as we know it; partly courtesy of Obama.

Obama’s stand on Syria is not much different from his stand in Ukraine and the South China Sea. Take the world to the brink of war, and then step back; not totally, but the Obama style.

And what about his stand on Yemen? This is the war that the world remembers to forget. Obama will not support the Saudis enough to win but he won’t stop the carnage either. In the meantime, tens of thousands of Yemenis have perished and millions are facing starvation; again, courtesy of Obama and cohorts.

The impact of Obama’s action and inaction on America’s traditional opponents is in reality infinitesimal in comparison to the confusion and traps that he has set for America’s traditional allies. I will leave it to Western European analysts to write about Obama’s legacy with the EU, but it is suffice for me to say that Obama’s policy in creating a needless tension between Western Europe and Russia is best described as an “after me the flood” policy. He is now walking away, leaving behind Western Europe with a flood of refugees and a huge crisis with Russia and a surging right wing reaction. In the Levant/Middle East, America’s traditional allies are Israel, Saudi Arabia and Turkey. Obama angered Israel with his nuclear deal with Iran, and yet he did not enact it. He also angered Saudi Arabia by the same deal, and added insult to the Saudi injury by not responding to their calls to help them out of their mess in Syria and in Yemen. As for Turkey, he almost completely severed American ties with the NATO member that has the second largest army after the US, and left Erdogan closer to Putin’s Russia than he is to Obama’s America. After the recapture of Aleppo by the Syrian Army, Erdogan is now even losing his popularity in the Sunni Muslim World; again and again, courtesy of Obama care-not. This is needless to say that hardly a week goes by without a massive suicide attack hitting the streets of Turkey.

Some might argue that Obama’s reluctance in making decisions that meant a higher level of involvement is the result of wisdom, but wise leaders to do not stoke fire in the first place and then sit back to watch it go wild. Obama’s reluctance is due to the fact that the “world’s most powerful man” is an incurable hesitant, recalcitrant, hopeless, hapless and incompetent wimp.

With a series of failures scattered across the globe, the capitulation of the Jihadists that he sponsored and abetted in Aleppo was the icing on the cake that Russia and Syria offered to him as a farewell gift to his tenure at the White House.

Obama failed to be a good President and he was too weak to even be remembered as a bad President. He will probably be remembered as the most spineless American President in history.

His only achievement perhaps is that he taught us to never feel confident about any hope coming from the White House. This is why when it comes to Trump, we need to exercise this caution. Whilst it is true that many of the steps and declarations that President-elect Trump has made were done after his election win and not before, and whilst therefore they are not election promises per se that were made to gain votes, and whilst it is also good to keep in mind that more than likely he means those promises because he had no reason to make them otherwise, we must always remember Obama’s disappointment. As we analyze Trump therefore, we must qualify our analysis by saying “if” he keeps his promises.

That was Obama’s single legacy of success, a legacy of instilling doubt in the White House even when a seemingly “extraordinary” President takes its residence. At all other levels, Obama leaves nothing behind but a legacy of failure.

 

From religion to politics, Saudi Arabia feeling chill of isolation

Sharmine Narwani
Sharmine Narwani is a commentator and analyst of Middle East geopolitics. She is a former senior associate at St. Antony’s College, Oxford University and has a master’s degree in International Relations from Columbia University. Sharmine has written commentary for a wide array of publications, including Al Akhbar English, the New York Times, the Guardian, Asia Times Online, Salon.com, USA Today, the Huffington Post, Al Jazeera English, BRICS Post and others. You can follow her on Twitter at @snarwani
15 Sep, 2016 11:06

From religion to politics, Saudi Arabia feeling chill of isolation

At the end of August, a meeting of Muslim clerics and scholars convened in the Chechen capital of Grozny to forge a consensus on the subject of ‘who constitutes a Sunni.’

Sunnism, the 200 or so Sunni clerics from Egypt, South Africa, India, Europe, Turkey, Jordan, Yemen, Russia warned, “has undergone a dangerous deformation in the wake of efforts by extremists to void its sense in order to take it over and reduce it to their perception.”

The Muslim world is currently under a siege of terror, led by a deviant strain that claims religious authority and kills in the name of Islam. So the Grozny participants had gathered, by invitation of the Chechen president, to make “a radical change in order to re-establish the true meaning of Sunnism.”

If their final communique was any indicator, the group of distinguished scholars had a very particular message for the Muslim world: Wahhabism – and its associated takfirism – are no longer welcome within the Sunni fold.

Specifically, the conference’s closing statement says this:

“Ash’arites and the Maturidi are the people of Sunnism and those who belong to the Sunni community, both at the level of the doctrine and of the four schools of Sunni jurisprudence (Hanafi, Hanbali, Shafi’i, Maliki), as well as Sufis, both in terms of knowledge and moral ethics.”

In one fell swoop, Wahhabism, the official state religion of only two Muslim countries -Saudi Arabia and Qatar – was not part of the majority Muslim agenda any longer.

The backlash from the Saudis came hard and fast, honing in on the participation of Egypt’s Grand Imam Ahmed al-Tayeb of Al Azhar, the foremost center for Sunni theological study in the Islamic world.

Saudi Arabia has, after all, subsidized the flailing Egyptian economy to the tune of billions of dollars in the past few years, alongside its Wahhabi neighbor Qatar, which has in turn bank-rolled the Muslim Brotherhood – a group also excluded from the Grozny meeting.

While Tayeb did not single out the Saudis in his conference speech, his elevated position in the global Sunni hierarchy lent a great deal of weight to the proceedings. And Al Azhar’s prominence in the Sunni world is rivaled only by the relatively new role of the Al Saud monarch as the custodian of the two holy sites, Mecca and Medina.

Just last year – in Mecca, no less – Tayeb slammed extremist trends during a speech on terrorism, lashing out at “corrupt interpretations” of religious texts and appealing to believers “to tackle in our schools and universities this tendency to accuse Muslims of being unbelievers.”

It is Wahhabism that is most often accused of sponsoring this trend globally.

The radical sect, borne in the 18thcentury, deviates from traditional Sunni doctrine in various ways, most notably sanctioning violence against nonbelievers – including Muslims who reject Wahhabi interpretation (takfirism).

Saudi Arabia is the single largest state contributor to tens of thousands of Wahhabi-influenced mosques, schools, clerics and Islamic publications scattered throughout the Muslim world – many of them, today, feeders for terrorist recruitment. By some accounts that figure has reached almost $100 billion in the last three decades or so.

In Grozny, conference participants made reference to this dangerous trend, and called for a “return to the schools of great knowledge” outside Saudi Arabia – in Egypt, Morocco, Tunisia and Yemen.

Saudi officialdom took to social media to express their outrage. Saudi royal, Prince Khalid al-Saud, warned that the event represented “a conspiracy that openly targets our country and it’s religious standing, specifically.”

بالأمس القريب ، واليوم
..
مؤامره على المكشوف تستهدف بلادنا، و مكانتها الدينية ” تحديداً ” …

And Adil al-Kalbani, the imam of Riyadh’s King Khaled Bin Abdulaziz mosque, ominously cautioned:“The Chechen conference should serve as a wake-up call: the world is getting ready to burn us.”

ليكن منبِّها لنا بأنَّ العالَمَ يَجمع الحطبَ لإحراقنا!

For the Saudis, the bad news kept on coming. On Friday, at the start of the annual 5-day Hajj pilgrimage, Lebanese daily Al Akhbar published online a shocking database from the Saudi Ministry of Health.

The leaked documents list, in painstaking detail, the names of 90,000 pilgrims from around the world who have died visiting Mecca over a 14-year period. If there was ever any question about the authority of the Saudi king as “custodian” of Islamic holy sites, this revelation should have opened those floodgates.

But even before these documents became public, calls for the Saudis to relinquish their administration of the Hajj were coming from Iran and elsewhere. Exactly one year ago, a stampede in Mina became the deadliest disaster in the history of the Hajj. Instead of tending to the dead and wounded as their utmost priority, the Saudi authorities went into lock down – concealing casualties, downplaying the death toll, blocking international efforts to investigate, forcing Hajj families to pay for the retrieval of bodies, denying wrongdoing and refusing to apologize for the disaster.

According to official Saudi government figures at the time, the total casualty toll stood at 769 dead and 934 injured. The leaked database now shows those numbers to be false. According to the Ministry of Health’s own statistics, the Mina death toll was in reality more than 10 times higher, with over 7,000 killed.

Iranians, who appeared initially to have suffered disproportionate losses – including from the collapse of a crane 12 days earlier at the Grand Mosque in Mecca where 107 died – lost around 500 citizens. Included in that number was senior foreign ministry official, Dr. Ghazanfar Roknabadi, Iran’s former ambassador to Lebanon and a key figure in regional geopolitical affairs. Saudi authorities initially denied he was even in the country and then took months to identify and repatriate his body.

But most disturbing of all was the manner in which the Saudis treated the dead and injured. Pictures that emerged from Mina in the aftermath of the disaster showed authorities shoveling up bodies in digger-like vehicles, then dumping them in piles as if they were sacks of sand. There appeared to be no care taken to even ascertain whether the victims were dead or alive.

The Iranians were justifiably outraged, but the Saudis politicized that reaction and turned it into an affront to Sunni authority by a Shia authority in Tehran. The Al Akhbar stats, however, tell another story. It was mostly Sunnis who were killed in Mina – from Egypt, Pakistan, Indonesia and other countries – with victims from some states surpassing even the Iranian death toll.

One year on, Iran is not letting this issue lie. The Iranians have boycotted the Hajj this year, claiming that Saudi Arabia was unprepared to assure them of basic security requirements during lengthy negotiations between the two nations.

In his most confrontational address to the Saudi state yet, Iran’s Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei last week – during his annual Hajj message – railed against the injustice:

“The heartless and murderous Saudis locked up the injured with the dead in containers — instead of providing medical treatment and helping them or at least quenching their thirst. They murdered them…Because of these rulers’ oppressive behavior towards God’s guests, the world of Islam must fundamentally reconsider the management of the two holy places and the issue of hajj.”

And then Khamenei went to the heart of the matter:

“The fitna-promoting rulers who by forming and arming wicked takfiri groups, have plunged the world of Islam into civil wars, murdering and injuring the innocent and shed blood in Yemen, Iraq, the Levant, Libya and other countries.”

In one short month, the Saudis have been challenged by Islam’s two mainstream sects – by the Sunni and by the Shia, equally – striking out at the religious authority claimed by the Saudi state and challenging the destructive, divisive, violent sectarianism of their Wahhabi faith.

Geopolitical losses

As if to prove Khamenei’s point – and the Grozny consensus – Saudi Arabia’s Grand Mufti Abdulaziz Al Sheikh shot back, describing Iranian leaders as nonbelievers: “We have to understand that they are not Muslims. … Their main enemies are the followers of Sunnah (Sunnis).”

But, with that last sectarian sling, it seems the Saudis may have finally hit their limit. Within days of his statement, citing “health reasons,” the Mufti was removed from delivering the Hajj sermon he has delivered for 35 years straight.

Why stop now? It isn’t like the Saudis don’t have the appetite for a fight with the Iranians.

That fight has been playing out throughout the Middle East and beyond, in various battlefields and media outlets, to the detriment of millions.

What may have started off as Riyadh’s desire to thwart the success of a populist Islamist revolution that dethroned a neighboring king – Iran, circa 1979 – has spiraled into an existential Saudi battle to claw onto hegemony and legitimacy in every sphere.

The Saudis have long lost the ability to engage in cold, hard calculation, and have thrown themselves headfirst into ‘winning by all means.’ This has meant releasing the demons of takfirism throughout the Middle East and North Africa. Wahhabi funded and enabled jihadi foot soldiers have sprung up in Syria, Iraq, Yemen and any other place where Saudis and their fellow co-religionists/ideologues have sought out hegemonic interests.

And the lack of coherent strategy has drawn the Saudis into a number of unnecessary quagmires that have now encircled their borders (Iraq, Bahrain, Yemen), wiped out their strategic depth and emptied the state coffers.

What was meant to be a swift aerial blow to Yemeni rebels for daring to defy Saudi authority, has morphed into an entrenched, 18-month-long, money-pit of a war, with 10,000-plus deaths, war crimes accusations, proliferation of jihadist terror and enemy encroachment into Saudi territory.

Riyadh’s leading role in the destabilization of Syria and Iraq has unleashed sectarian mass murder that has gutted the Muslim world, unmasked Saudi complicity, and galvanized its adversaries into historic cooperation.

These wars have drawn in powerful benefactors like Russia and China as buffers against Saudi overreach, and has reshuffled the balance of power in the region – against Saudi interests.

All of which has chipped away at Saudi political, economic and religious clout on the international stage.

In 2010, Saudi Arabia was crossing borders peacefully as a power-broker, working with Iran, Syria, Turkey, Qatar and others to troubleshoot in regional hotspots. By 2016, it had buried two kings, shrugged off a measured approach to foreign policy, embraced takfiri madness and emptied its coffers.

The hundreds of thousands dead in the wake of this ‘Saudi madness’ are mostly Muslim and mostly Sunni. As the Muslim world wakes up to this atrocious state of affairs, like the Sunni scholars of Grozny, they will not look to censure Tehran, but to disengage with Riyadh.

And to write the final chapter on an aberrant sect called Wahhabism.

Wahhabi

The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of RT.

Related Articles

ويكيليكس السعودية .. حبر يبحث عن الدم

يقيني في الكتابة وعقيدتي معها هي أنها دوما يجب ان تتحول من تفاعل بارد بين الورق والحبر الى تفاعل حار لاينتهي بين الحبر والدم .

. فيستحيل الكلام الذي يسكب حبرا في كؤوس العيون الى خمر مضيء يتوهج في العقول .. وتذيب حرارة الحبر الدم المتجمد في العروق وتعيده دما ساخنا فوارا قانيا يجري في العروق الى القلوب والضمائر والأرواح .. والا فان الكتابة لاتعدو ان تكون تنضيدا للكلام كما توضع التحف والصمديات والمزهريات والتماثيل الحجرية على الرفوف البلهاء وكما تعلق ايقونات الذهب في أعناق الجهلة .. ولذلك صرت كلما كتبت بهذه العقيدة وبهذا اليقين اختلط علي الامر ولاأدري أيهما الدم .. حبري أم دمي؟؟ .. وأيهما الحبر .. دمي أم حبري؟ ..

وهنا سأكون في منتهى الصدق ان قلت بأن كل ماورد في الويكيليكس السعودية التي أطلقها جوليان اسانج لايساوي شروى نقير وأن لاقيمة له على الاطلاق وأنه حبر لايذيب الدم الجامد في العروق .. رغم أن ماورد فيها كفيل بأن يزيح المريخ عن مداره وان يسقط رأس نيوتن على سطح القمر .. فمستوى الفضائح فيها مخجل جدا .. وحجم العار يعلو على جبال الهيمالايا ..

لاتساوي هذه الأسرار الويكيليكسية شروى نقير لأنها أولا لم تفاجئ مواطنا واحدا عربيا من المحيط الى الخليج ولا تشكل اكتشافا يشبه اكتشاف سر كوهين .. ولم يرفع حاجب عربي أو عربية من المحيط الى الخليج تعجبا ولم يحبس احد أنفاسه وهو يقرأ ويشهق .. وأتحدى أن يقول لي مواطن واحد سواء كان من عشاق المعارضات العربية أو من عشاق التيارات الاسلامية أو من محبي الديكتاتوريات أوعشاق الملوك أو من المقاومين أو الممانعين أو المستقلين أو النائين بالنفس .. أتحداه ان يقول بأنه مذهول أو مصاب بالصدمة والدهشة وخيبة الأمل ..

هل فاجأ أحدا منكم ان يعرف ان سمير جعجع القاتل لرئيس وزراء لبنان رشيد كرامي انما هو شخص تدعمه السعودية التي تدعم كل القتلة والمجرمين وهو يدعمها بالتسول وبالأحرى بطلب الأتعاب كما أي مرتزق؟؟ وهل فوجئ أحد منكم بأن وليد بيك جنبلاط يمالئ وينافق ملك السعودية وأنه يبيع الموقف والكلمة ببراميل نفط ؟؟ وأن الشتائم التي طالما أطلقها ضد السوريين وضد الرئيس بشار الأسد ماهي الا صفقات وأرقام صرف على شيكات سعودية .. ولاعلاقة لكلامه بثأره لدم أبيه كما يدعي ولا علاقة لدم رفيق الحريري به .. الذي صار واضحا أن دم أبيه ودم صديقه رفيق الحريري مشروعان رابحان وحقلا نفط منتجان للمال ليس أكثر ..
وسيكون عتبي عليكم كثيرا وتقديري لذكائكم ليس عاليا اذا قال لي أحدكم بأنه مذهول ومستغرب ومبهوت لأنه يرى في وثائق ويكيليكس دليلا قاطعا أن الأزهر يساهم في المذابح والفتن وهدم دين الاسلام وفي بناء اسلام داعش ودعم أبي بكر البغدادي بصمته  على مايجري .. لأن الأزهر كما يبدو دون مجاملات قد باع لسانه وقلبه ومآذنه بأذانها والأزهر وسجاده وقبابه الى أمراء آل سعود .. باعها بالجملة وكما تباع سبايا داعش وغنائمها داخل المساجد التي يجب أن يتحرر فيها الناس وتعتق فيها الاعناق .. فماالفرق بين أبي بكر البغدادي وبين شيخ الأزهر؟؟ الأول يسرق النفط ويبيعه والثاني يسرق قلب الازهر ويبيعه لتجار النفط ؟؟ الاول يسبي النساء ويباعد بين المذاهب والثاني يسكت عن سبي النساء ويسبي التقريب بين المذاهب .. وصار الأزهر بلا هيبة وهو يطلب الاذن في الكلام والصيام والصلاة والسجود وتلاوة القرآن كما التلاميذ المهذبون .. وصار ثمن الأزهر كله بضعة براميل نفط فقط لاغير ..

وأما من يقول بأنه لايصدق عينيه أن السعودية منعت السلاح الى غزة فيما تدكها طائرات اسرائيل بالفوسفور الأبيض فسأرسل له من يهديه عينين جديدتين .. وعقلا جديدا .. وقلبا جديدا .. لأنه يحتاج الى تغيير كل ماينفع التفكير والحدس والاستقراء والبرهان القاطع ..ولاشك بعد كل هذا العمر والتجربة مع السعودية ان مالديه لايناسب رأس نملة .. ولاعين ذبابة .. ولا قلب بعوضة ..

ولكني اعتقد جازما أن جوليان اسانج صاحب الويكيليكس أخطأ هذه المرة في رهانه بأنه سيحدث صدمة وروعا في الأمة باطلاقه لمجموعة ويكيليكس السعودية لأنه ارسلها الى أمة صار دمها باردا كدم الزواحف وذوات الدم البارد .. فالسعودية تتصرف علنا بما يفوق فضائح الوثائق المسربة .. فهي تخون علنا .. وتعلن الجهاد علنا مع اسرائيل .. وتشعل الفتنة علنا .. وتحرض على الكراهية والقتل علنا .. وتقتل اليمنيين علنا .. وتشجع القتلة وتكافئهم علنا .. وتبارك الذباحين من على منابر المساجد ومساحات الفضاء علنا .. ومع ذلك لايحاسبها أحد ولاتحتج على سلوكها حكومة ولامظاهرة .. فأين الجديد يااسانج؟؟

أخطأ أسانج لأنه أظهر الوثائق الى أمة تعرف كل ماورد في أوراقه ورقة ورقة ولكنها أمة صارت تنجب ملوكا يعملون جواسيس ومثقفين يبررون للجواسيس فعل الخيانة .. فماذا يتوقع من أمة عرفت أن فيها ملكا على مملكة هاشمية كان يعمل جاسوسا عند الأميريكيين ومع هذا لم تخلعه ولم تحاسبه ولم تقطع نسله وسلالته .. وكان يطير الى اسرائيل وينذر الاسرائليين ويحذرهم فيها من حرب مفاجئة عليهم .. بل جاء بابنه من أم يهودية عاش كل عمره خارج مملكته وجعله ملكا ولم يعترض معارض واحد على هذا الاستهتار الهاشمي والملكي بأدنى درجات احترام الشعب الذي يحكمه ..

وماذا يتوقع اسانج من أمة تثور في ربيع الحرية ولاتعبر شعارات الحرية حدود الممالك والامارات .. بل تستحم الشعارات والحرية والعدالة الاجتماعية والكتب والمؤلفات الماركسية والاسلامية والشهادات العلمية والقصائد العصماء في آبار النفط وتعود خارج الحدود مبللة وجسدها يقطر بالنفط وشعرها مبلل بالزيت الأسود .. ؟؟

ماذا يتوقع أسانج من أمة ترى أن السعودية لم تدفع طوال مئة سنة بمواطن سعودي واحد الى فلسطين وأنها حاربت كل من حارب اسرائيل دون هوادة ولكنها ترسل كل ابناء المملكة الوهابية يموتون منتحرين متفجرين بأشلائهم في مساجد دمشق وبغداد وفي اسواق فقراء العرب وفقراء اليمنيين فقط؟؟

ماذا يتوقع اسانج من اللبنانيين الذين يستسلمون لأقدارهم ويتركون أحمد فتفت يتباهى أنه قدم الشاي للغزاة الذين قتلوا آلافا من مواطنيه ومع ذلك لايسأله مواطن واحد أو يستدعيه قاض واحد الى محكمة؟؟ .. وماذا يتوقع اسانج من اللبنانيين الذين تنازلوا عن حقهم الطبيعي في ممارسة السلطة وتركوا السياسة لعائلات الطوائف .. فجنبلاط الثاني يرث عن جنبلاط الأول ويورث جنبلاط الثالث .. وجميّل الثالث يرث من جمّيل الثاني الذي ورث عن جميّل الأول ويورث جميّل الرابع .. والحريري الكبير ورث الحريري الصغير الذي سيقرر منصب ولي العهد وولي ولي العهد على غرار السعودية .. وكل الطوائف مملوكة لملوك صغار للطوائف كما ملوك النفط وشيوخ القبائل .. ومع ذلك يريدون بوقاحة تعليمنا الديمقراطية السياسية وينتقدون الجمهوريات التي يسمونها وراثية ..

ماذا يتوقع اسانج من اللبنانيين وجمهور المستأبل الذين يعرفون أن سعدو الحريري الذي يتنقل بين باريس والرياض ليس زعيما لبنانيا وليس فيه صفات الزعامة ولا القيادة وأنه سفير سعودي مدلل ليس الا .. ومع هذا فانهم يعتبرونه زعيم السنة في لبنان مساويا لرشيد كرامي وسليم الحص؟؟

ياصديقي اسانج .. لقد تجرع المواطن العربي أخبار الخيانات وأخبار الطبقات السياسية الوضيعة التي تتلاعب بمصيره دون ان تحاسب واعتاد قلبه على سم الأفاعي والعقارب .. وصار اذا لسعته افاعي الأسرار والوثائق لايصاب بالتسمم ولا حتى بالألم .. ويتابع طريقه كما لو كانت دودة قد عضته .. نصف مليون وثيقة سعودية تعادل نصف مليون أفعى تعض المواطن ولايبدو أنه تأثر بالسم .. ولكن بعوضة طائفية واحدة تخزه هذه الأيام تجده على الفور يحك جلده بالسكاكين والرصاص ويسلخ جلده السني عن لحمه الشيعي ويفصل قلبه السني عن صدره الشيعي بالساطور ..ويطيح برأسه عن جسده ..

ماذا لو كانت الوثائق تقول مثلا ان حزب الله لم يقدم السلاح الى أهل غزة في الحرب ؟؟ أو أنه اصاب بالخطأ قبة مسجد ناء لأهل السنة في قرية نائية ؟؟.. كيف كان جنون سم العقارب؟؟ وماذا لو قالت الوثائق ان الأسد قد زار السيدة زينب حفيدة النبي وقرأ الفاتحة في مرقدها؟؟ كيف سيكون فحيح الافاعي يطغى على هدير البحر وهي تبكي على الجامع الأموي الذي ابتلعته قم ..

ياصديقي يااسانج .. أسرارك ليست اسرارا بل هي أخبار قديمة .. وقديمة جدا .. الفارق فقط هي أنها تشبه القمامة في حوض من الزجاج واليوم تخرج من الزجاج وتنشر روائحها الكريهة ..

لانريد يااسانج ان نعرف كم قبض سمير جعجع لأننها نعرف أنه قاتل مأجور وقد كان يوما على الحواجز داعشي الهوى والعقيدة والسكين .. بل نريد ان نعرف من سيقتل الآن وماالثمن .. وكم صار أجر القاتل وثمن الجريمة ..

ولانريد ان نعرف ماذا يغيظ سعد الحريري ولا ماذا يستفزه بل نريد أن نعرف ان كان رجلا أم نصف رجل أم شيئا آخر بين البينين !!! مثل آل سعود .. ونريد ان نعرف لماذا يصب سعدو الحريري دم أبيه على الحدود بين المذاهب يرسم الخرائط بين الناس ويريد أن يكون هذا الدم لعنة على وطن ونقمة على أجيال؟؟ ..

لايهمنا يااسانج أن تقول لنا ماذا يدور في غرفة الملك السعودي لأن مايقوله وأتباعه أخطر مما لايقوله .. بل نريد أن نعرف سر هذه الأسرة السعودية الغامض .. من أين أتت؟؟ ومن أين تبدأ شجرتها وأين جذورها تنتهي؟؟ ولماذا تهدم هذه العائلة قبر النبي وقبر أمه ومنزله وقبور صحابته .. كما لو كانت عائلة تكرهه؟؟ ونريد أن نعرف سر ظهور اسرائيل ومملكة آل سعود في نفس الزمن وكأنهما أخوان لأم واحدة هي بريطانيا يؤازر بعضهما بعضا ..؟؟ ونريد ان ترسل لنا وثائق قديمة جدا تعترف أن هناك دما يهوديا في البيت المالك السعودي المرخاني ..

ولانريد ان تقول لنا ياأسانج ان فيصل القاسم شخص رخيص مثل رياض الأسعد بل نريد ان نعرف نوع الشيزوفرينيا التي يخفيها عن الناس عندما كان يعالج منها في بريطانيا .. ونريد أسماء الأطباء الذين كانوا يكتبون التقارير عن حالته النفسية واضطرابه السلوكي وأنواع العقاقير والمهدئات التي كان يتعاطاها ليظهر لنا رجل بعقل معاكس وضمير معاكس واتجاه معاكس ..

ماأريدك أن تنشره يااسانج مثلا ليس ان كان عزمي بشارة جاسوسا اسرائيليا أم لا بل مانريد ان نعرفه هو رتبته العسكرية في الموساد الآن فقط ..



ياأسانج قل لنا في المرة القادمة ويكيليسا تركيا لنرى كيف ان اردوغان كان يريد أن يتقاسم مع اسرائيل خارطة أرض العرب وشعب العرب ومن كان منا في حصة الباب العالي .. وكيف انه يستقبل البغدادي في بيته .. وانه يتناول الغداء مع الجولاني .. وأن له نصيبا في النفط المسروق ونصيبا في السبايا ونصيبا في معامل حلب المسروقة ونصيبا في تجارة البشر والأعضاء البشرية .. وقل لنا كيف وصل أردوغان الى السلطة بدعم ماسوني كبير في صفقة في السجن مع لوبيات المال الذين حقنوا البورصة التركية من أجل عينيه ليقال انه رجل ينقذ تركيا .. وقل لنا يااسانج أن أردوغان هو الذي قتل سكان الغوطة بالكيماوي من اجل مشروعه المجنون .. وقل لنا يااسانج أن حزب العدالة والتنمية هو ذراع الناتو الدموية التي ترتدي قفازات اسلامية ناعمة .. ومخالبها الاخوان المسلمون وداعش والنصرة ..

قل لنا يااسانج عن اسرار خالد مشعل وعن تمثيلية حقن السم في اذنيه لجعله بطلا يتسلل الينا؟؟ وقل لنا عن الثمن الذي تقاضته قيادات حماس لتطعن بالسوريين .. وقل لنا أحاديث لقاء مشعل في قطر مع أميريكيين اسرائليين لاقامة خلافة اسلامية في غزة وينسى بعدها فلسطين من البحر الى النهر .. بشعار هدنة طويلة الامد ..

كل مانشرته يااسانج لم يحول دماء العرب الى حبر أو الى نار لأن ليس في عروق العرب دماء بعد اليوم بل مذاهب وطوائف ونفط واسلام مريض وناتو .. ومانشرته من حبر الوثائق لم يتحول الى خمر معتق ودم في عروق نسيت طعم الحبر المعتق بعد أن اعتادت أن تقرأ في اوراق البترودولار ..

ماورد في وثائقك يااسانج لو كان يخص شعبا آخر لكان كفيلا بأن يسقط المريخ عن مداره وأن يسقط رأس نيوتن على سطح القمر .. وأن ينهار الضوء في القضاء وينقصم ظهره وينهدّ عزمه وموجاته .. فمستوى الفضائح فيها مخجل جدا .. وحجم العار يعلو على جبال الهيمالايا .. ولكن ماهو اكثر عارا هو أن هذه الفضائح لم تطلق محاكمات وتحقيقات واعتذارات ولن تدفع أحدا للاستقالة خجلا .. ولم تدفع مظاهرة واحدة ولافتة محتجة واحدة .. بل كل من ذكرته الوثائق متسولا وقوادا وبائعا للجريمة ينظر اليها بلا مبالاة وكأنها لعبة ورق خسرها مع الأصحاب أو لعبة طاولة لم يكسبها بالأمس في المقهى .. لأنه يعتقد يقينا أن من وراءه أبقار واغنام وقطعان ماشية .. وأن الماشية ليست الا ماشية .. وأنه لايمكن للحبر في مواسم الحبر أن يستحيل الى مواسم خمر .. وأن تكون حرارة الحبر سببا في ذوبان الدم المتجمد في العروق ليطلق فيضانا أحمر قانيا يجرف هذه الأسماء الوضيعة الهزيلة من خارطة السياسة ..وخارطة العار ..

 

River to Sea Uprooted Palestinian

   

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the Blog!

النبي أفيخاي .. العمامة الناجية من النار

هذه الصور ليست مجرد تعبير عن سخرية وسخط من تعاطف الاسرائيليين مع مآسي الشرق وتورطهم قي الثورات الاسلامية 

ولكنها الصورة المعبرة عن الحقيقة وهي أن كل التأزم الديني الذي يرتدي العمامات الملونة والمتنوعة في الشرق يقبع تحتها صهيوني يتلاعب بالناس و بدين الناس واله الناس .. وينشر الوسواس الخناس الذي يوسوس في صدور الناس .. فمرة نجده في ثياب جبهة النصرة ومرة في ثياب الوهابية ومرة في ثياب داعش وعماماتها ومرة يكون مع “ثوار” الغوطة و”جيش الاسلام” ويدعو لهم بالنصر ومرة تثور ثائرته لضحايا “الدروز” في ادلب وينفر لنصرة السويداء .. ولاتستغربوا أبدا ان صادفتموه يوما بعد ان ينتهي عمله في تحطيم الجمهور”السني” أن ينتقل لنراه ناشطا في النجف الأشرف …
هناك بلا شك اختراق هائل للدين الاسلامي وسيطرة على مفاصله .. ولسانه .. واعتقال لعقله .. وتجري أكبر عملية احتيال ونصب عرفها الاسلام منذ نشأ في وانطلق من غار حراء مع كلمة اقرأ .. لتحل محل اقرأ كلمة اذبح وانبح .. 
هذه الصور الساخرة لأفيخاي أدرعي الناطق باسم جيش الاحتلال الصهيوني ليست تسخر منه على الاطلاق لأنه يبدل عماماته وألوانها بل تسخر بمرارة مما وصل اليه حالنا وحال ديننا الذي تتولاه “النصرة وداعش وفتح الاسلام” وهي تنظيمات من اتجاه يؤمن بعقيدة (بالذبح جيناكم) .. وكذلك يتولاه حزب العدالة والتنمية الأطلسي الذي حلل الزنا بالغائه لعقوبة الزنا .. ويتولاه يوسف القرضاوي شيخ الناتو .. ولذلك لن يبقى تحت عمامته الا افيخاي أدرعي ناطقا باسمه .. الذي قد نجده يوما يغسل الكعبة مع من يسمى خادم الحرمين الشريفين ..ولاتستغربوا يوما أن تقوم شركة اسرائيلية بنسج كسوة الكعبة وفرشها من الداخل .. ولاتستغربوا أن تروا خادم الحرمين يلبس قلنسوة يهودية أمام حائط المبكى في القدس ويرد له نتنياهو الزيارة بجولة في الحرم المكي ..
لتطهير الدين الاسلامي من أشكال العمامات التي تخفي تحتها أفيخاي ادرعي يجب على العالم الاسلامي أن يعلن ثورة شاملة على المهانة التي الحقها به كثير من رجال الدين المسلمين الذين بسببهم وبسبب جشعهم للحياة الدنيا وممالأة الأمراء ونفاق الملوك يتجول الاسرائيليون في عواصمنا ويشاركون في افراحنا وأتراحنا وصاروا أصدقاءنا ليس في الفيسبوك فقط بل وجها لوجه كما لو كانوا من بقايا الصحابة وآل البيت الأطهار .. فيتسابق الجميع لنيل رضاهم ودعمهم من أجل السلطة .. والسلطة فقط ..
كم كان مهينا للنبي ولدين النبي أن يتسابق العالم الاسلامي للتعبير عن غضب المسلمين من رسوم سخيفة كاريكاتيرية وافلام مشوهة عن النبي .. وكم كان مشينا تلك الهرولة الاسلامية لادانة واستنكار مذبحة تشارلي ايبدو الفرنسية .. حيث تنطح المتنطحون للتبرؤ من هذا الاسلام العنيف البهيمي المتوحش .. وحيث تدافعت الأكتاف المسلمة لتزاحم الاكتاف غير المسلمة في شوارع باريس وتنافست الألسن مع الألسن في اجتراح اصناف النأي بالنفس عن هذا السلوك الشائن ..حتى محمود عباس الذي غاب عن التعزية بأي مجزرة في سورية لم يتأخر في التعبير عن تعاطفه مع الشهداء الفرنسيين ..
النبي لاتهينه رسوم .. والنبي لاتهينه قصص ولا أفلام تسيء اليه .. لأن ماقيل له في حياته وماسمعه من انكار له كان ربما أقسى ومامر عليه في الطائف وحدها ليس بالقليل .. وما لقي في دعوته من استخفاف الكثيرين من المجتمع القرشي ومن أقاربه وأعمامه الذين سموه بالأبتر ربما كان أشد ايذاء .. كل هذا ليس اهانة للنبي وللاسلام .. بل الاهانة الكبرى للاسلام ولكرامة النبي هو هذه اللامبالاة الاسلامية المفجعة تجاه العنف والوحشية التي يمارسها “الثوار” الاسلاميون من ليبيا الى سورية الى أنبار العراق والى اليمن بحق الجميع ..
فالعالم الاسلامي رأى الثوار السوريين يذبحون ويكبرون منذ الأيام الأولى لما يسمى الثورة السورية .. ولكن الكل تسابق في تبرير وحشية الثوار والكل تسابق لاعلان الصمت المطبق والشماتة بالنظام في سورية الذي كما قالوا اختار الحل الأمني فدفع “الثور” لاختيار الحل الوحشي .. وشرب الجميع اللامبالاة مع الماء وتنفسوا الاستهتار مع الاكسيجين..
كيف يمكن أن تحدث بشاعة الذبح علنا أمام كاميرا ضد شخص مسلم – لأنه خصم – ويقوم بهذا العمل الدنيء المتوحش شخص مسلم ملثم أو غير ملثم ولاتقوم قيامة العالم الاسلامي ويجن جنونه .. ويطالب بارسال جيوش لاعتقال القاتل وداعميه وكل من يباركه ويؤيده ويطالب بمحاكمة جميع من ذبح باسم الاسلام ؟؟ 
كيف يحدث أن يتباهى مجرم مثل الكويتي شافي العجمي أمام الكاميرات في شوارع الكويت ويقول علنا وهو يتفاخر بأنه ذبح طفلا ونحره في دير الزور اما أبويه ولايجن جنون الشعوب الاسلامية وتملأ الدنيا بالمظاهرات وتحاصر السفارات الكويتية حتى تحاكم هذا الرجل وتنزل به القصاص لأنه اهان الرسول ورسالة الرسول ودين الرسول .. الذي لم يقل يوما ان الطفل يذبح باسم الاسلام؟؟ 
وكيف لايهتز الأزهر الشريف ويتصبب عرقا ويرتجف فيه صوت الأذان ويتهدج فيه صوت القرآن ويبح الترتيل والتجويد وهو يسمع خبرا مذلّا للاسلام وللنبي كمثل خبر مسلم يأكل قلب جندي سوري نيئا ويكبر .. أمام كاميرات العالم ..؟؟ هل أهين النبي والاسلام بسبب صورة رسام هولندي أو فرنسي أم بسبب قلب يأكله مسلم ولايتحرك شارع واحد في العالم الاسلامي محتجا .. ولاتتصدع جدران المساجد من الهتاف والمطالبة باحضار هذا الحيوان لمحكمة اسلامية ينال بها عقابه ليباهي الاسلام ويتفاخر أمام الدنيا بأنه دين بشر وليس دين حيوانات كاسرة؟؟ 
كيف لايذبح الدواعش وجبهة النصرة ضحاياهم ولايسحقون سباياهم بالاغتصاب فيما العالم الاسلامي ينظر ببرود وبلاهة اليهم وكأنه يرى الأضاحي في عرفات في يوم العيد ولاتثور ثائرة المسلمين في كل العالم وتجبر السعودية وحكامها والأردن وحكامه على اعتقال كل عائلة أنجبت مثل هذه الوحوش وتحتفي بهم عندما يموتون وتتقبل التعازي “بشهادتهم” في أعراس ومضافات ومهرجانات بدل التبرؤ منهم وطلب الغفران من الأمة والشعور بالعار والذل كما لو كان تصرف ابنائهم تهمة كتهمة الزنا؟؟ هذه العائلات بسلوكها المشين بتقبل التهاني بمقتل ابنائهم في الجهاد ستنجب أجيالا من القتلة لاتنتهي ..

كيف لايهان النبي الا بسبب رسم وكاريكاتير وتعليق صحفي .. ولكن نبش قبور صحابته واهانتها أو التهديد بنبش قبور آل البيت لايشكل اهانة له وطعنة في قلبه؟؟ ومع هذا فان قتل امرئ بوحشية وتعليق الرؤوس الآدمية على المآذن في حلب وعلى قضبان الأسوار الشبابيك في الرقة السورية أمام الكاميرات باسم النبي لهو أقسى على قلبه من نبش قبور صحابته وآل بيته ..وأكثر تلويثا لاسمه مما يفعله رسام وصاحب مجلة ..

لاتسألوا بعد اليوم عمن أهان النبي .. فلم يهن النبي على يد أحد أوروبي كما أهين اليوم على أيدي المسلمين أنفسهم .. فالمسلمون جميعا تشاركوا في اهانة النبي وقتله وصلبه والتمثيل باسمه عندما صمتوا شعوبا وقبائل كالأموات عما يفعله بعض المسلمين ببعض المسلمين .. ولم يعد يكفي أن يقول المسلمون بأنهم ضحية مؤامرة غربية تريد النيل من الاسلام والنبي وتحطيم هذا الدين .. ولم يعد يكفي الاستسلام بالقول بأنها الوهابية السياسية والتيمية السياسية لأنه صاروا شركاء في هذا المؤامرة عن سابق اصرار وترصد وسابق لامبالاة واستهتار .. وربما من الانصاف القول بأن هذه الذرائع الواهية والحجج المائعة مثيرة للسخرية والقرف والاحتقار .. لأن مايجب على المسلمين عمله هو النهوض والقيام قومة رجل واحد وحشد الناس في الشوارع ومحاصرة كل رجال الدين الصامتين عن الذبح او الذين ينتقون من الذبائح من يغضبون لاجله ومن لايغصبون لأجله .. حسب مايراه الوالي والأمير والملك ..والاطاحة بهم جميعا أو الاضراب عن الذهاب الى تلك المساجد .. واقتلاع عشرات آلاف الوعاظ من المنابر في الأزهر والحرم المكي وكل العالم الاسلامي الذين يحدثونهم عن الجنة والنار وعذاب القبر وحيض المرأة وينسون الجحيم الذي على الارض الاسلامية .. وينسون تلويث اسم النبي بالدم وحز الأعناق والجنس المريض وجهاد النكاح .. وارغام النبي على مضغ لحم قلب نيء لجندي مسلم شهيد تحت التكبير لن يكون أكل كبد الحمزة أكثر تعذيبا له منه ..
لو كان العالم يرى أن المسلمين أكثر غيرة على انسانيتهم وعلى رقيهم الديني لما تجرؤوا على اهانة النبي ولوجدوا أنهم لايملكون سببا واحدا للاقدام على ذلك وهم يرون أن المسلمين هم من يحمون نبيهم ودينهم بمنع كل من يريد الحاق الاهانة بهما بالصاق الدم به والعنف والحيوانية .. ولكن أمة تهين نبيها بالصمت عن فعل الذبح ولاتثور مساجدها ولاتقوم فيها القيامة ضد كل من افتى بالقتل وسمح بالدم وأيّد القتل والمذابح في مصانع القتل في مساجد السعودية التي ترسل المزيد من ابنائها لممارسة هواية القتل ومتعة التوحش تستحق أكثر .. وأمة لاتدافع عن انسانية أبنائها تستحق أكثر .. وتستحق هذه الأمة أن يكون افيخاي ادرعي نبيها المصطفى .. يرتدي لها كل يوم عمامة .. وأن يكون له مسجد باسمه .. ومذهب باسمه .. وطائفة باسمه .. تكون هي الوحيدة الناجية من النار ..

ومايحدث ان هذا النبوءة تتحقق لأن اسرائيل اليوم هي الفرقة الناجية الوحيدة من النار الاسلامية .. وتل ابيب اليوم هي أكثر أمنا من أية عاصمة عربية .. لأنها تصنع العمامات والثوار والمذاهب وهي من تقرر من هي الفرق الناجية من النار ..

Related Videos 

nosra-israel

وثائقي | خيوط الموت

River to Sea Uprooted Palestinian   

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the Blog!

Dammam Blast Provokes Religious, Regional Bodies to Call for Islamic Unity

Local Editor

Saudi Arabia: Dammam attackThe Saudi Arabia received on Friday and Saturday letters of solidarity from various international and regional bodies, condemning the terrorist attack around Al-Anoud Mosque in Dammam.

In Egypt, Al Azhar Imam Ahmad el Tayyeb condemned on Friday the suicide attack outside the Dammam mosque, asserting the need to respect the brotherhood of Islam.

“Bloodshed is forbidden and houses of worship should be distanced from conflicts,” Tayyeb said in a statement, stressing the importance of not being dragged into sectarian rifts.

Al-Tayeb stressed the need to give priority to reason and wisdom, and not to be deceived by schemes seeking to ignite sectarian strife.

The Board of Senior Ulema on Friday also condemned the suicide attack near Al-Anoud Mosque in Dammam, stating that the ” terrorist groups behind the ghastly attack on Al-Anoud Mosque and Al-Qudaih’s Ali Bin Abi Talib Mosque have exposed their hideous faces.”

In a statement issued on Friday and carried by the Saudi Press Agency, the board said: “Islam forbids attacking places of worship even in legitimate wars. How can one target mosques in a Muslim society and a country that rules by the Shariah and serves the Two Holy Mosques?”

The statement also called for unity to “root out the menace of terrorism from our society.”

A suicide bomber – disguised in women’s clothing – blew himself up in the parking lot of a Shiite mosque in Saudi Arabia’s Eastern city of Dammam.

A member of the Popular Committees (PC) – formed of residents and are charged of defending the mosque – suspected the terrorist and informed the Saudi security forces deployed there, yet he didn’t receive an answer. Then, he immediately rushed to catch the bomber who was hurry to detonate himself several meters away from the place, killing four people including himself.

The blast also set several cars ablaze.

The Islamic Republic of Iran strongly condemned the attack, and stressed the need for taking all necessary measures to prevent such incidents in the future.

“We stress the need for taking all measures to prevent such incidents and to seriously confront all those who have targeted the regional security and stability and intend to stir the religious differences,’ Foreign Ministry Spokeswoman Marzieh Afkham said on Friday night.

For his part, Head of The Union of Tribes and Clans in Arab States, Ma’an al-Jarba, strongly condemned the twin terrorist attacks in on Al-Anoud and Al-Qudaih’s Ali Bin Abi Talib Mosques.

In a statement issued on Friday, Jarba reiterated warns of playing with the flame of sectarian sedition, and spreading hatred among religions and sects, and eliminating the human values.

“All this will pave the way for the enemies of Islamic Ummah, and will disperse its unity, calling for facing the takfiri terrorist expansion through rejecting the Wahhabi ideology and that of Ibn Taimiya.

Moreover, the Head of Arab Parliament, Ahmad bin Mohammed Al-Jarwan, condemned the criminal attempt to target the Dammam mosque, and said in a statement: “Terrorists seek to destabilize the Arab and Islamic nations’ security… Terrorism will never succeed in destabilizing national security.”

Also, Head of Al-Ashraf Syndicate Mahmoud el Sharif and Chief of the Supreme Council of the Sufi Orders Abdel Hadi el Qasabi condemned the terror attack.

Source: Al-Manar Website

30-05-2015 – 13:04 Last updated 30-05-2015 – 19:58

الملف | مجزرة القديح ، الاهداف والتداعيات | العالم

 

Related Articles

River to Sea Uprooted Palestinian   

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the Blog!

Al-Azhar scholar being investigated for visiting Iran

Rehmat

IMAGE635506218689312298[1]Sheikh Ahmad Karima, professor of Islamic Law at Cairo’s Al-Azhar University is being investigated by his peers for attending a Shia Seminary on Islamic Jurisdiction held in Iran in in September 2014. Al-Azhar, built by Shia Fatimid rulers, is a government controlled religious institution since Nasser took power in a military coup.

Sheikh Ahmad al-Tayyeb, head of Al-Azhar University has condemned Karima for giving a lecture on Sunni version of Islamic jurisdiction at a Shia seminary. He also temporarily suspended Karima from the Supreme Council for Islamic Affairs at Al-Azhar. The Iranian General Secretariat of Seminaries had sent an invitation to professor Karima, a Sunni scholar from Azeri region of Iran, to attend the seminar. Al-Azhar did not send an official delegate to represent Egypt or the University.

Karima told privately-owned Mehwar television channel that he went to give a lecture in Iran’s Suni Kurdistan area in order to mobilize against what he described the increasing influence of Wahhabi/Salafi and Muslim Brotherhood thought in Egypt and the rest of the Muslim world.

The conflict between Egypt and Iran is political and not religious. We are not in direct animosity with the Iranians, who are not infidels. I went for a scientific mission, and the supporting documents are in front of Al-Azhar management,” he said.

On Tuesday, Egyptian tourism minister Hesham Zaazou announced that Iranian tourists may not be welcomed in Egypt for security reason. I bet Netanyahu is pleased to hear that.

Hoda Badri interviewed Sheikh Ahmad Karima for Egyptian Daily News, published on September 24, 2014 in which Karima accused both Muslim Brotherhood and Wahhabi (Saudi Arabia) behind his character assassination. Karima had been a critic of Muslim Brotherhood since formerly elected president Dr. Morsi took power. He blamed both Brothers and Saudis for fueling Shia-Sunni conflict for the benefit of the western colonial powers.

Iran broke diplomatic relation with Egypt in 1979 when Egyptian military dictator Anwar Sadat recognized the Zionist entity in return for $1.3 billion annual bribe. Since then, Dr. Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, became the first Iranian president to visit Egypt in February 2013 to attend World Islamic Summit in Cairo. During the visit Ahmadinejad received a red-carpet treatment from Morsi government. He also visited Al-Azhar and held a meeting with Sheikh Ahmad al-Tayyeb.

Egypt’s deposed president Dr. Morsi visited Tehran to attend NAM summit in August 2012. It was a first visit of an Egyptian president to Iran in more than three decades.

RELATED

River to Sea Uprooted Palestinian   

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the Blog!

Al-Azhar students start school year with protests against Egyptian authorities

Egyptian students of al-Azhar university run for cover from a tear gas canister fired by riot police during clashes outside their university campus in Cairo on October 20, 2013 following an anti-army protest. (Photo: AFP-Khaled Desouki)
Published Tuesday, October 28, 2014
With the start of the new academic year about three weeks ago, student protests against the authorities have resumed and are now at the forefront of the political and the media scenes in Egypt. Protests and student demonstrations began on the first day of college classes, which started about one month later than usual – a delay that many interpreted as reflecting the authorities’ concern about the start of the new academic year.
In fact, last year, clashes between college students across the country and the police, sometimes backed by the armed forces, had reached fever pitch. At one point, members of the “Parachute Team,” an elite unit in the Egyptian army, descended in the vicinity of the women’s faculty of al-Azhar University. Last year was tough and both sides engaged in acts of violence, with the constant burning of police cars and al-Azhar administrative offices around campus all year long.
The Muslim Brotherhood (ED: BROTHERS OF AMERICA) has a strong presence among students at al-Azhar, where the “Generation of Desired Victory” was the Brotherhood’s extension in the student body, and one of its stronger arms with which it faced the government on many occasions in the past. This lead to what is known as “the Azhar Militias” in 2006, when Brotherhood student leaders were arrested and many of them sent to military court, the most prominent of whom was the Muslim Brotherhood Deputy Supreme Guide
Khayrat al-Shater before former President Hosni Mubarak decided to set the students free.
One of the most conspicuous conflicts took place after the publication of the novel, “A Feast for the Seaweeds” by Syrian author Haidar Haidar in 2000. Many Egyptians considered its events and details heretical, in addition to the fact that its printing fees were covered by the Ministry of Culture. Subsequently, large protests broke out at al-Azhar University. In the light of these events, the authorities decided to lower the student population living on campus to a minimum, and to apply restrictions on its residents.

[T]he religious formation and knowledge al-Azhar students acquire create a gap between the true religion they learn in school and what they see in society, which strengthens their tendency to protest.

According to some observers, the religious formation and knowledge al-Azhar students acquire create a gap between the true religion they learn in school and what they see in society, which strengthens their tendency to protest.
Furthermore, a rural upbringing in Upper Egypt (southern Egypt) embeds the values of solidarity and cohesion among students in the face of what they consider threats, as seen in the dozens of clashes that took place with the university’s security guards for non-political reasons. For example, an assault on one student by a security guard because of an altercation later turned into an expansive protest in the university and on campus.
Speaking to Al-Akhbar, Omar al-Sabakhi a faculty member at the University of Alexandria, explained that al-Azhar University is taking the lead in student protests because “students there have already received a high level of religious education at school even before reaching college. Their religious sentiment is provoked, which is an essential driving force of the protests.”
“Generally speaking, there is a deep rooted idea among Egyptians that individuals enrolling in religious studies come from a poor and marginalized background, further fueling those individuals’ feelings of oppression which emanates from being raised in a modest environment,” Sabakhi said, adding that “this feeling of oppression has intensified because they did not receive their well-deserved rights, three years after the revolution against Mubarak.”
Sabakhi, a researcher who focuses on student movements, said college students have more reasons to complain compared to regular citizens, adding

“Al-Azhar students have obviously the most reasons to [complain] because they have received a higher level of religious education, added to the fact that al-Azhar as an educational institution and as part of the ruling authority, fully separates its demands from those of the student movement.”

According to Sabakhi, the administration of al-Azhar

“seeks financial or executive privileges for its members, or aims to attain stability and impose and maintain regulations. This does not involve students because administrations always side with the ruler while students stand on the opposite side.”

However, Osama al-Hatimi, another specialist in student movements, does not believe that al-Azhar University is leading the student protests which started about a year ago.
He attributed the

“intensification of student movements there, especially after June 30, 2013 to the intellectual affinity with the Muslim Brotherhood, seen by them as a party which was ousted from power. Besides, giving their strict religious upbringing, al-Azhar students [normally] side with the Islamic project, and believe that what happened also targeted them because they belong to the same project.”

“Ever since the 1930s, student groups have been opposing the administration’s wishes,” … the student movements “were the thermometer used to measure Egyptian society and its ambitions.” – Osama al-Hatimi, specialist in student movements

 “Ever since the 1930s, student groups have been opposing the administration’s wishes,” Hatimi said, elaborating that the student movements “were the thermometer used to measure Egyptian society and its ambitions.”
He also explained that student movements usually challenge the authorities’ approaches.

“In cases of an economic downturn, student movements have always been the first to step up to demand economic rights and freedom because they do not have political considerations and behave according to their beliefs in absolute and abstract values, far from the political calculations of political forces and parties.”

Hatimi rejected what he described as “attempts to link political work to a certain social environment,” saying it is a false explanation because the residents of Cairo and cities in general constitute 90 percent of the Egyptian population, although he admitted that a rural upbringing is usually more influenced by religion.
Hatimi said that even if a large segment of al-Azhar students come from modest backgrounds, in the end they are still part of the Egyptian social structure and they deserve to demand their rights.
This article is an edited translation from the Arabic Edition.
Related Videos

مسلسل الارهاب وتحديات المرحلة


هجمات سيناء والتداعيات على الداخل المصري


Related Articles

River to Sea Uprooted Palestinian   
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the Blog!

Daash/Wahabism and the concept of freedom and the use of violence in Quran مفهوم الحرية واستعمال العنف

Shaikh Ahmad Karima: On Iran, Islam and sectarian Islamists

ماذا بعد _ الشيخ د احمد محمود كريمة | المنار

الشيخ احمد كريمه يرد بعد زيارته لايران و توجيه بعض الاتهامات اليه

محمد شحرور – مفهوم الحرية واستعمال العنف

River to Sea Uprooted Palestinian   

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the Blog!

 

 

Assad, in a meeting with clerics, scholars and preachers: on the jurisprudence of the crisis

كلمة الرئيس الاسد في لقائه مع رجال الدين، العلماء والخطباء والداعيات_حول فقه الازمة
حوار اليوم _ كلمة الرئيس الاسد امام رجال الدين _ د السيد، د فرفور، د الصواف / الفضائية 2
كلمة الرئيس الاسد امام علماء الدين _ خالد العبود / الاخبارية 25 4 2014

Brotherhood’s thugs torch Azhar university, one killed

Students torch Cairo university, one killed

A man stands outside a faculty building at Cairo’s Al-Azhar University after student supporters of the Muslim Brotherhood stormed it on December 28, 2013. (Photo: AFP – Khaled Kamel)
Published Saturday, December 28, 2013
Egyptian police shot a student dead Saturday at Cairo’s Al-Azhar university after Islamist students set fire to their university, health ministry officials said.
The 19-year-old student was killed as police entered the campus to confront protesters who torched the commerce faculty building, the officials said.
The students entered the building during an exam and set it alight before police and security forces members burst in and fired tear gas and apparently live ammunition.
A police official said 60 of the students were arrested after the fire on the first two floors of the building was brought under control.
The students were trying to stop the exams, which started on Saturday, as part of their protest against the military’s overthrow of Islamist president Mohammed Mursi in July.
They have regularly clashed with police on the university campus.
The violence comes a day after three people were killed in clashes and 265 arrested across Egypt in a crackdown on Brotherhood demonstrations.
The military-installed government has banned protests by Brotherhood members demanding the reinstatement of Morsi, after listing the Islamist movement as a terrorist organization this week.
The interior ministry on Friday said “legal measures are underway in accordance with the cabinet’s listing of the Muslim Brotherhood as a terrorist organization.”
The Brotherhood’s designation as a terrorist group carries harsh penalties, with the group’s leaders facing possible death sentences and protesters looking at up to five years in prison.
The movement has held near-daily protests since the military ousted Mursi on July 3, despite a crackdown that has killed more than 1,000 people, mainly Islamists, and seen thousands more arrested.

Qaradawi Says Supporting Mursi ’Obligation’

Local Editor
Qatar-based Islamic cleric Yusuf al-Qaradawi issued on Monday a religious edict, or fatwa, in which he said that supporting ousted President Mohammad Mursi is an obligation and called on Defense Minister Abdel Fattah al-Sisi to withdraw from the political scene to protect legitimacy and democracy.

In his fatwa, Qaradawi said, ‘I call on Sisi and those with him and all parties and political powers in Egypt to stand united to defend the truth and reinstate President Mursi and to continuously advise him.’

Qaradawi added that those whom Sisi has helped do not represent all Egyptians but only a small part of them.

He also said that Al-Azhar Grand Sheikh Ahmed Al-Tayyeb was wrong to support rebellion against the legitimate President of the country, saying his stance is neither supported by the Quran nor Prophetic tradition.

Qaradawi further added that Coptic Pope Tawadros II was not authorized to speak in the name of Copts, nor was Mohammad ElBaradei delegated by Egyptians to speak at their behest.
“ElBaradei only has the support of a handful of people and the opposition have not said that he is their representative,” he said.

Qaradawi underlined that the ouster of Mursi was wrong, both from a constitutional and jurisprudential perspective.

“A president who was undoubtedly elected through democratic means should serve his entire term of four years so long as he is capable of working.”

He added that from a jurisprudential point of view, a president should be obeyed.

In a fatwa he issued earlier this month, Qaradawi had called on Egyptians to back Mursi, as the elected president. In this fresh fatwa, Qaradawi deems supporting Mursi a religious obligation.
On 30 June, millions of Egyptians flocked to the streets across Egypt to demand Mursi’s ouster and early presidential elections.

On 3 July, Sisi announced the removal of Mursi and the appointment of Adly Mansour, the head of the Supreme Constitutional court, as interim president.

Source: Websites
29-07-2013 – 18:09 Last updated 29-07-2013 – 18:09

Egypt Marks 1 Year on Mursi with Slogans “Leave”, “Legitimacy Is a Red Line”

Sunday protest

Local Editor
Protesters started since early morning flocking to the streets of Cairo in two camps, one under the slogan “leave”, which gathered at Al-Tahrir square and Al-Ittihadiya Presidential Palace, and another one under the slogan “Legitimacy is a red line”, which gathered near Rabiha Al-Adawiyah mosque.
After one year of Mohammad Mursi’s rule, thousands of protesters returned to Al-Tahrir square to form a million-man March, demanding the president to leave office and make early presidential elections.Protesters chanted and raised slogans against Mohammad Mursi and the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt.Rabea Al-AdawiyyaPublic Committees closed the roads surrounding Al-Tahriri square and established entrances, and as part of the precautionary measures taken, tens of members searched people joining the protests and checked their IDs to ensure no thugs were present among them.In parallel, hundreds of protesters gathered around Al-Ittihadiya Presidential Palace and set up tents in the area amid strict security measures and a wide deployment of the security forces.In contrast, President Mursi’s supporters cut the roads leading to Rabiha Al-Aqawiyah square in the second day of protests under the slogan “Legitimacy is a red line”.

Mursi’s supporters also took precautionary measures, and searched protesters before entering the square to ensure that no intruders join the protests.

According to Al-Youm Al-Sabea (the seventh day), the protesters chanted slogans in support of Mursi and denouncing the opposition.

Moreover, the website published images for supporters of Mursi, dancing with sticks and threatening the opposition.

Flags for Al-Qaeda were also raised in Rabiha Al-Adawiya protests, according to Al-youm Al-Sabea and other sources.
Qaeda and Mursi
Al-Azhar Calls for Having Self-Control and Avoiding Violence

For his part, Imam of Al-Azhar, Sheikh Ahmad al-Tayyib called on the Egyptians to have self-control and avoid any kind of violence in Sunday’s protests.

In a statement he issued on Sunday, Al-Tayyib stressed on the importance of considering the higher interest on this day and avoiding any act which would harm this benefit.

Al-Tayyib had stressed on Saturday that the 30th of June must be a day for dialogue between opposing parts, and called upon Egyptians to act responsibly.

US Embassy Shuts Doors

For its part, the US embassy shut its doors to avoid any clash, and demanded its citizens to avoid travelling to Cairo, as sources said that it had evacuated its employees who did not work in security.
In parallel, Al-Youm Al-Sabea website reported that 88 US nationals in Cairo had left the country on Saturday and Sunday.

Source: Agencies
30-06-2013 – 14:33 Last updated 30-06-2013 – 14:33 |

Protest Chaos Governs Egypt: At Least 3 Dead

Fear and uncertainty descended on Egypt Friday night as supporters and opponents of President Mohammad Mursi took to the streets for rival protests two days ahead of mass demonstrations planned Sunday to demand his ouster.
Amid fears of escalating violence in the days ahead of the planned protest marking a year since Mursi was elected with a narrow majority, Egypt’s leading religious figures appealed for calm.Sporadic violence in the lead up to Sunday has left six people dead.In parallel, an American was stabbed to death in Alexandria during clashes between supporters and opponents of Mursi after earlier clashes in the city saw one man shot dead and around 10 injured. Overnight Thursday a member of the Muslim Brotherhood was also shot dead in the Nile Delta town of Zagazig.

Preachers of the ancient al-Azhar Islamic institute warned of impending civil war, calling on Mursi opponents to scrap their plans for mass rallies and accept his offer of dialogue in a sign of impending chaos.

“Vigilance is required to ensure we do not slide in to civil war,” said preachers from the group.
But the atmosphere is undoubtedly tense and the opposition seems resolute.

Tahrir Square, the focal point of mass demonstrations in early 2011 that saw the overthrow of dictator Hosni Mubarak was filled by mid-afternoon with protesters and their tents, indicating a determination to stay put. Food and drink stands appeared, ready to fuel the growing crowds.

The opposition claims to have gathered 15 million signatures calling for Mursi to stand down – 2 million more than the number of votes he received when he was elected – and expects many of those to turn out Sunday.
The Muslim Brotherhood issued a statement warning of “dire consequences that will put the country into a violent spiral of anarchy.”

Meanwhile, senior Muslim Brotherhood leader Mohammad al-Beltagui warned opposition protesters Friday that “we will not allow a coup against the president.”
Closely watched Sunday will be Egypt’s army.

Egypt’s army Wednesday brought in reinforcements of troops and armor to bases near Egyptian cities ahead of June 30 protests and has warned it will intervene again if there is violence “to defend the will of the people.” Both sides have interpreted that to mean they will support their positions.

Source: News agencies, Edited by website team

 

Egypt clashes kill four ahead of mass anti-Mursi demos


29-06-2013 | 08:47

The Takfiri Armies

1010580_479222622157597_2084352249_n[1]

The Takfiris who are working wonders in Syria are not news to this world nor are their deeds unknown or unfamiliar . Long before in Europe, labeling others as heretics has been one of the most spread practices of the Catholic Church who worked wonders in this instance killing scientists and executing saints and this before and after installing what they called the Inquisition . Not very much later, under the banner of Catholicism, Master Columbus – the pirate who worked under the order of their Spanish majesties- invaded the Americas and disposed of the natives , killing them , sacking their country , enslaving them , starving them and chasing them out of their villages and towns . Columbus was just performing his religious duties regarding those who were not Christians because he thought he had the Divine right to do this to infidels as ordained by the Church and by the Catholic  Monarchs who needed badly the money and the gold. The Anglican church did not behave any better regarding the Irish,  when it invaded Ireland and established its colony considering Irish as sorcerers- who need to burn on the stake- nor did  the Puritan Anglo Saxons who landed on the northern New Continent – at the end of the 17th century – and decimated the indigenous populations .

What Takfiris are doing, right now, falls within the same line of conduct,  punishing those heretics who have not followed the literal religion as practiced and understood by the Takfiris who were initiated by various religious authorities and used as political and killing tools in a vast  world conspiracy . Many religions have been subject to this deviation , mainly Christianity- as practiced by the Church – Judaism- as practiced by Zionists-  and Islam as understood and practiced by Sunni rulers and Sunni Religious References to serve the  inimical  foreign  agendas of the World order .  Other religions also  might be subject to same kind of experience .

This attitude -of self righteousness -comes from total ignorance of the purport of religion , whereby one considers his own religion as better than others’ which makes him think that he has the right to kill and abuse the lives of those he considers beneath him . This is how the Puritan settlers -convinced that the Natives had no right to the land of America- which is Native land – exterminated them almost entirely until 2 millions only were left from the 20 millions that populated the North continent before the Puritan settlers landed . The same attitude is found  behind the Zionist usurp of Palestine on behalf of Zionist Jews who think that God favored them among others,  and gave them the land of Palestine . This idea that my religion is better than yours., and I am better than you,  and this gives me rights over you,  is behind so many miseries that have plagued humanity recently, the last one being this ugly war on Syria – waged under the banner of Islam- against a peaceful country and a peaceful people . No doubt that this attitude comes from the blinded ego  and from the greed of predator countries  who use the ignorance of people to mobilize a full world army , and this has nothing to do with religion itself .

Even if not directly threatening to others,  this feeling of a superiority of a certain religion is often misplaced . Many Muslims think Islam is superior to other religions while they know neither true Islam nor other religions . It is true that Islam completes Judaism and Christianity-  in a way- but this makes Islam complementary in a sense- but not superior to the other religions . While the great misunderstanding many Muslims show – and among them ‘ religious people and ‘Ulemas – comes from  considering Native religions,  and the religions that pervaded the Antiquity and the Native religions of the people of Africa and America as pagan religions,  and to condemn these religions without knowing much about them .

The respectable ‘Alem- upon seeing a Hindu revering a cow – described him as a lost soul . Who told you so Mister and how do you know that this soul is lost and not yours’ and who are you to judge and say so?  Have you been given authority to look in the hearts of people and see what only God can see ? What if the same Hindu judges you saying that you repeat verses and words you do not understand instead of worshiping God through the visible and the manifest , through God’s creation , through Mother Nature and Godly Saints and Deities ? And why is revering the cow that gives food and milk labeled as irreligious while killing people in the name of religion has not been sanctioned yet or labeled as Kufr ?

There is a need that all religions that are searching for the same truth meet because,  having religious people  hurt each other will be hurtful to the common truth they are all seeking,  and to their respective religions that will be exposed by atheists who will think that atheism is better than religion.

The Sheikh of al Azhar- who was has been hosted today by al Mayadeen TV- and who upon being asked why al Azhar has not issued a fatwa that prohibits the killing of Muslims by other Muslims as happening in Syria , said that al Azhar does not need to issue such fatwa because the ordinances of the religion are clear regarding this matter that Muslim is not to kill another Muslim ? I bet the al Azhar would have hurried into  issuing a fatwa had  other religions or beliefs- like Hinduism or Christianity- or practices by Hindus or Christians-  been under  question. This variety in God’s creation and in belief has been intentionally created by God, not as a source of antagonism and discord but as a source of learning and knowledge for the authentification of one’s belief and confirmation of one’s faith. . We are here to learn and to become good recipients to true Religion and we learn from others, otherwise we are liable to sway the Takfiri way or become complacent partners in the crimes committed nowadays against humanity and religion .

 

Egyptian Brotherhood Violates Rights Using ‘Divine Mandate’

 

A protester in Cairo holds a sign reading, “If Brotherhood controls Al-Azhar, Morsi will beat us, Brotherhood has no religion” during a protest in support of Al-Azhar Mosque’s assertion of independence from the Muslim Brotherhood, April 5, 2013. (photo by REUTERS/Amr Abdallah Dalsh )

By: Alaa al-Aswany Translated from As-Safir (Lebanon).
اقرا المقال الأصلي باللغة العربية
 
In 1492, the city of Granada — the last stronghold of Islam in Spain — fell when Abu Abdullah, the last of the Arab kings, was defeated by the army set up by the Catholic monarchs King Ferdinand and Queen Isabella. Although the king and queen had signed a convention in which they pledged to respect the country’s Muslim and Jewish citizens, it was never followed. They decided to expel the Jews from Spain (something Spanish King Juan Carlos apologized for five centuries later), while Muslims were given the choice of converting to Christianity or death.
 
Thousands of Muslims who refused to convert were killed; men, women and children alike were beheaded. Many Muslims embraced Christianity, fearing for their lives. These converts were degradingly referred to as “Los Moriscos” [baptized Moors].
 
However, forcing Muslims to embrace Christianity was only the beginning of their agony, as authorities then took a number of severe measures to oppress and impoverish these citizens. Their efforts to annihilate Islamic culture and traditions led these converts to rebel multiple times. Later, authorities realized that many of these converts were still practicing Islam secretly.
 
Here the issue became complicated, for these converts — from a legal standpoint — were Catholic Christians like all other residents, yet from a practical standpoint they were secret Muslims. Authorities feared that they would teach their children the principles of Islam, something that would create a new generation of Muslims that officials did not want. Furthermore, the Roman Catholic Church had serious doubts about the converts’ beliefs. Would Christ accept their faith, or would they remain outside the fold of the church?
 
Then a strange and mysterious figure emerged who would play a key role in the evolution of events. He was a monk from the Dominican Order named Jaime Bleda, famed for his piety and eagerness to maintain pure Catholic doctrine. After much thought, Bleda became convinced that it was impossible for the church to know for sure if the converts truly believed in Christ or were merely pretending to be Christians for fear of their lives. Thus, the only solution was for these converts to face Christ so that he himself could decide whether they were sincere in their faith or hypocrites. Of course, they could only face Christ in the afterlife, so Bleda proposed killing all of the converts so that their souls would ascend to Christ and he could judge whether or not they had faith.
 
The strange thing is the church agreed to Bleda’s plan and was enthusiastic about it. Clergymen were ready to kill hundreds of thousands of converts so that they could be closer to God and maintain the purity of Catholic doctrine. The Spanish government, however, objected to killing such a large number of converts, anticipating resistance that could exhaust the authorities. Thus, the government decided to finally expel all of the converts from Spain. Bleda accepted this solution, although he preferred the idea of killing the converts. The French historian Gustave Le Bon (1841-1931) describes these events in his book The Civilization of the Arabs:
 
“In 1610, the Spanish government issued an order to expel the Arabs from Spain. Many of the migrants were killed during the journey. Bleda expressed his satisfaction that three quarters of these migrants were killed in the process. Nearly 100,000 migrants from a single convoy consisting of 140,000 Muslims were killed on their way to Africa.”
 
 Here one must wonder: How could a religious man agree to the killing of such a large number of innocent people merely because they disagreed with his beliefs, without feeling the slightest sense of guilt? How can one reconcile faith in Christ — who taught humanity peace and love — with this bloody temperament shown by Bleda? The answer is that faith in any religion does not necessarily make us more humane. The manner in which we understand religion is what determines our behavior. Our interpretation of religion is what teaches us tolerance, justice and compassion, yet it also can push us to fanaticism, hate and aggression.
 
If we believe that all religions are merely different ways of getting to know our Lord Almighty, then we must realize that we’re not better than anyone else regardless of whether we’re Muslims, Christians or Jews. The majority of people inherit their religious beliefs from their parents, and we must realize that God will judge people based on their actions, before judging them on their religious convictions.
 
If this were our understanding of religion, then we would be tolerant of those who have other religious beliefs. We would defend the rights of all humans, regardless of their religious beliefs. However, if we believe that our religion is the sole absolute truth that transcends all other religions, then we would feel that we alone are the pure believers and those with differing religious beliefs are impure infidels living in delusion. If this is the case, then — logically — we would not acknowledge that those who differ from us have the same rights, and our fanaticism could push us to believe that we are authorized by God to elevate his word and implement his will.
 
This false divine mandate could push us to feel that we are above all others and abuse their rights. It could result in us committing the most heinous of crimes without feeling any guilt, for we believe that we are carrying out God’s will. Bleda had a clear conscience when he agreed to killing innocent people, because he felt that he was carrying out God’s will, which was for Spain to be a Catholic country in which there was no room for Muslim and Jewish infidels.
 
This belief in a divine mandate repeated itself many times throughout Spanish history, and often led to heinous crimes committed in the name of religion. Here there is no difference between the monk Bleda and the terrorist Osama Bin Laden. Although there are differences in time and circumstances, they have the same train of thought and the same vision for the world. They both believed that they had a mandate from God to implement his will and defend religion, and that those who differed from them in religion were less human. They also both believed in collective responsibility. Bleda believed that all Arabs were responsible for the actions of any Arab, while Bin Laden believed that all Westerners were responsible for the crimes committed by US and Israeli soldiers against Arabs and Muslims.
 
When it comes to the concept of a divine mandate, there is no room for personal responsibility. It was impossible to persuade Bin Laden that there were millions of people in the West who repudiated the crimes of the American army, just as it would have been impossible to convince Bleda that there were Muslims he had killed who could have been good citizens. The value of others’ lives and their rights are totally absent in the mind of people who believe they have a mandate from God.
 
Bin Laden wasn’t concerned with the lives of non-Muslims, just as Bleda wasn’t concerned with the lives of Arabs. Both of these men killed thousands of innocent people believing that they were doing something good that would get them into heaven.
 
When you believe that you have a mandate from God, you will never allow others to criticize your actions or judge you. Regardless of what you say, you would never respect those who differ from you nor acknowledge their rights. You would feel as though you were always correct, for you are carrying out the will of God. You would never be able to see reality correctly; you would live in a closed virtual world that never develops or changes. You will deny the truth, regardless of how obvious it is, and you would treat anyone who questioned your virtual world with hostility. You live inside this world, and if you lost it your life would be destroyed.
 

The Simple Act of Tying Shoes Reveals Brotherhood’s Program

This idea may help us to understand the Muslim Brotherhood and many others who are affiliated with political Islam. Months after the Brotherhood came to power, Egyptians are asking: How can the Brotherhood claim that it represents religion, while at the same time continually lying, breaking all agreements it has signed, and colluding with other parties to achieve their own interests, even if the price for this involves the blood of martyrs and the collapse of the state itself?
 
Why do Brotherhood members not feel any guilt as they attack, degrade and kill those who disagree with them? The answer is that Brotherhood members do not see themselves as politicians who have made mistakes or are hurting others; they believe that God has sent them to save Egypt from infidels and delusion. They believe that they are carrying out the will of God, and thus cannot be held accountable in accordance with the same standards applied to ordinary people, who act solely based on their ideas. The Brotherhood believes that God has given it a mandate to elevate his word and carry out his rule. Accordingly, anyone who criticizes it or argues with its politics, in the Brotherhood’s view, is an enemy of Islam. The Brotherhood is Islam, and no one else can represent the religion.
 

Acts of Torture Reveal True Nature
Of Egypt’s Muslim Brotherhood

Brotherhood members believe that everything happening today is reminiscent of Islamic history — they are the Muslims and their opponents are the enemies of God. A few days ago a Brotherhood member wrote an article in which he compared the clashes in Moqattam to the Battle of Uhud. Naturally, in this comparison they were the companions of the Prophet Muhammad and their adversaries were the infidels. This is how the Brotherhood views this political dispute. Brotherhood members are true believers who want to carry out Islamic law, while their opponents are remnants of the Mubarak regime, Western or Zionist collaborators, or infidels who hate religion.
 
What is happening in Egypt is quite clear. An elected president has turned into a dictator for his group; he has trampled on the law and imposed the will of the Brotherhood’s supreme guide on all people. He has used an illegitimate attorney general to punish all who oppose him, while his security services have killed hundreds of citizens and tortured thousands.
 
The Brotherhood, as a result of its belief in a divine mandate, is unable to see the truth. It is always prepared to deny, argue and deceive. There is no use in trying to convince the Brotherhood of the truth. Even if the Brotherhood’s supreme guide killed thousands of Egyptians and the group’s politics brought about major catastrophes, Brotherhood supporters would still defend everything the organization does. Its members believe that they are carrying out the will of God. The Brotherhood’s supreme guide is exactly like Bleda and Bin Laden. He is a man who feels he represents the will of God. He is ready to violate the rights of others without blinking an eye, for he believes that God has enabled his group, and thus the will of the people worries him.

 

So, what can we do?

 
History teaches us that there is no hope in coming to an understanding with religious fanatics who see themselves as God’s instruments for achieving his will. There is no point in talks and negotiations. The solution is to apply pressure until this fascist regime is toppled. The revolution should not get lost in corridors of politics or sterile negotiations.
 
We are demanding early presidential elections, the dismissal of the illegitimate attorney general, the cancellation of the invalid constitution and the prosecution of those responsible for murder and torture — first and foremost President Mohammed Morsi and his interior minister and executioner Mohammed Ibrahim. These are the just demands of the revolution, which should not give up on them or accept compromises of any kind. The revolution will continue to victory until it triumphs over fascism and achieves all of its goals.
 
Democracy is the solution.
 

River to Sea Uprooted Palestinian  
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this Blog!

Islam On Trial

Daniel Mabsout,

Tantawi-Perez2 - Copie[1]

Big deal ! The Al Azhar University has broken its golden Sphinx silence and has condemned the Fatwas- issued by certain Sheikhs of the religion- licensing the marriage between teenager women- fourteen of age and above- and different fighters subsequently, as a form of Jihad permitted during the war on Syria. The al Azhar labeled these Fatwas as illicit and not allowed in Islam.
Rejoice O Muslims and human beings because the Al Azhar has finally spoken , and has decided to deliver something for the occasion after the crimes have extended and multiplied , after girls have been abducted from Tunisia and elsewhere and have eloped with terror groups that call themselves Mujahideen . But this happy interference- that made our day- will be restricted and limited to this domain .There was no follow up and no will or desire -on behalf of the Al Azhar- to expand more on the subject and break the silence concerning the dubious practices of the Syrian opposition .There was no mention of the crimes committed by people who claim to be Sunni Muslims . No mention of the torturing , the killing of helpless civilians, the liquidation of soldiers , the rape of women , the sacking and stealing of belongings and other material, the abduction and evicting of people and the conspiring with foreign forces and Intelligences and the killing of Sheikhs and notorious ‘Ulemaa’ in addition to the destabilizing of a whole peaceful nation and society .
The Al Azhar does not seem concerned with such illicit acts and will not condemn the killing of innocents and that of ‘Ulemaa’ and label them as non religious and non Islamic . There is no doubt that the hateful acts of the thugs of the opposition are covered by most Sunni religious authorities and sanctioned as a form of Jihad , otherwise , the fighters would not have claimed to fight under the banner of Islam . There is religious license given to this war on Syria under the pretext that it is carried on by a certain sect against another .
No doubt that this ugly war is justified by major religious authorities instead of being denounced and condemned and seen in its ugly true picture as a war launched by Israel and the allies of Israel, against the forces of the Resistance. Sunni Islam in general and- especially al Azhar- and the high religious authorities of the religion have embarked on a very dangerous trip exposing their own religion to great misfortune . All this because these religious references are playing in the hands of rulers and kings, and have become affiliated to them, and have subjugated Islam and religion to the forces of corruption and blasphemy and evil bringing thus Islam under the control of the Zionists and their masters and slaves.
What will remain of Sunni Islam after all this is done? Not much I presume unless a real religious consensus is formed that condemns and labels -as non Islamic- all the illegal , illicit practices of the opposition witnessed in Syria . Religion – in general- whether Islam or Christianity – cannot afford such distortions and deviations and evil doings committed in its name . If not corrected or straightened, these distortions and deviations and evil doings will cause religion to turn into something else that is not itself. As a result, religion might become an institution – maybe rich and flourishing – but it will cease to be a real religion because it will lose its ethical foundation and moral background that is the platform for all spiritual knowledge and true commitment . Sunni Islam cannot recover alone from such a defamation caused by people who claimed to be Sunni Muslim ; therefore this Islam needs to review its position, and go over its choices, others wise it will be doomed to undergo the fate of other degenerate practices.

River to Sea Uprooted Palestinian  
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this Blog!

"The Brotherhood & the Jews are one; Israel’s security is part of the Brotherhood’s security & the security of the Brotherhood is part of Israel’s security,”

 

“The Brotherhood & the Jews are one; Israel’s security is part of the Brotherhood’s security & the security of the Brotherhood is part of Israel’s security,”

“… Speaking to protesters in Cairo’s Tahrir Square, Sheikh Mohammed Abdullah Nasr, leader of the Front “Ozharyoun with civil state,” said U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry is coming to Egypt on March 2 to support “Mursi the Zionist.”He described Kerry as a “Jew and the son of a Jew,” saying the American top diplomat would be received with mobs hurling eggs and tomatoes at him upon his arrival to Egypt.…”

River to Sea Uprooted Palestinian  
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this Blog!

Abu Arfa: calling for national Reconciliation in Syria,

فيديو – الشيخ صلاح الدين أبو عرفة : كان أحرى بيوسف القرضاوي وبمشايخ الأزهر أن يدعوا إلى عصمة دماء المسلمين
أكد الشيخ صلاح الدين أبو عرفة أحد أئمة المسجد الأقصى أنه كان أيسر لمن بدأ الحرب على سورية وأعان عليها ودعا إليها وأرسل بالسلاح أن يدعو إلى الخير لأنه أنفع لأهلها وأنجى له يوم الدين .
 
وقال أبو عرفة في رسالة وجهها إلى السوريين من مدينة القدس المحتلة “أقول لكم يا أهل الشام ما نصح لكم ولا صدقكم من دعاكم إلى الحرب وحرضكم عليها ودفعكم في نارها وأوارها وهو آمن طاعم.. طامع في قصورها” موضحا أنه ليس في كتاب الله ما يدعو إليه هؤلاء المفسدون الذين سعوا في الأرض فسادا وأهلكوا حرثها ونسلها داعيا أهل الشام إلى إصلاح ذات البين والسلم والرحمة.
وبين أبو عرفة أنه كان أحرى بيوسف القرضاوي وبمشايخ الأزهر أن يدعوا إلى عصمة دماء المسلمين من أمة محمد صلى الله عليه وسلم كما دعوا إلى عصمة دماء المصريين مبينا أن المرجع والإمام الأكبر للمسلمين جميعا هو كتاب الله.. من قال به فقد صدق وأفلح ومن خالفه فقد كذب وخاب وخسر وغش وهو ليس من المسلمين في شيء.

( الخميس 2013/02/28 SyriaNow)
River to Sea Uprooted Palestinian  

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this Blog!

%d bloggers like this: