US Moved Air Force Command From Qatar To South Carolina Fearing Iranian Attacks

US Moved Air Force Command From Qatar To South Carolina Fearing Iranian Attacks



The US Air Force Commander Center’s operation was moved from Qatar to South Carolina, after operating out of the Middle Eastern country for the last 13 years.

The Command Center was used to command fighter jets, bombers, unmanned aerial vehicles and other US Air Force assets from Northeast Africa, the Middle East to Southeast Asia.

On September 28th, the building of the Combined Air Operations Center (CAOC) in al Udeid Air Base, Qatar was vacated.

All flights and operations were controlled from Shaw Air Base in South Carolina, US. Over 300 planes were in the air when the shift happened in Syria, Afghanistan and the Persian Gulf.

On the next day, the CAOC in Qatar regained control, but this marked the first-time operation was transferred to the US since the CAOC was initially established in Saudi Arabia during the 1991 Gulf War.

Air Force Commanders said that new technology allowed the shift and it was a long-standing ambition. But it surely comes by no accident, as it happens during renewed tensions in the Middle East, with both US and Saudi Arabia having a tough rhetoric on Iran. The Islamic Republic also leaves no quarter in its responses.

“The functions that the CAOC provides for air power are so critical and so essential that we can’t afford to have a single point of failure,” said Maj. Gen. Chance Saltzman.

Air Force officials said that the increased tensions in the Middle East and the incidents blamed on Iran added urgency to possibly moving command away from the region – especially if a war would be coming.

“Iran has indicated multiple times through multiple sources their intent to attack U.S. forces,” said Col. Frederick Coleman, commander of the 609th Air and Space Operations Center.

“Frankly, as the war against ISIS winds down and as we continue to work through a potential peace process in Afghanistan, the region is calming down and potentially more stable than it has been in decades,” he said. “Except for Iran.”

Analysts, quite obviously, said that if a conflict arises the command center would likely be targeted.

“It doesn’t take a whole heap of imagination to look at it and think, if push came to shove and it was a full-blown conflict, it would be one of the priority targets,” said Douglas Barrie, a senior fellow specializing in aerospace at the International Institute for Strategic Studies in London.

Most notably, the base is defended by Patriot batteries and other missile defense systems, whose capabilities were clearly presented in defending Aramco’s oil infrastructure on September 14th.

According to Saltzman, the practicalities of missile defense made complete protection impossible.

“It’s really probably better to think about this as an immune system,” he said. “There’s going to be germs that get into the body. It’s about how fast and how resilient you can fight it off.”

By making the CAOC mobile, the US could respond to a potential attack much more quickly.

Byron Pompa, AFCENT operations director at Al Udeid, said moving facilities and equipment often could compensate for not having a huge footprint across the region.

“In times like today,” he said, “we can’t have a ton of permanent-fixture operating bases throughout the area of responsibility.”

“Our goal is deterrence,” Saltzman said, not conflict. But the lack of communication with Iran can make sending that message difficult. The U.S. has to use other measures, he said, including turning off radar from time to time or planning flight routes to make it clear it does not intend to attack.

The plan is to operate the CAOC remotely once per month, while it would remain in Qatar during the remainder of the time. The idea is to reach 8 hours of distanced operation every 24-hour period, either from South Carolina or elsewhere.

There were no plans to close al Udeid permanently. Some of the 800 positions are to be transferred to US in the future.

“The goodness here is now we’re saving taxpayer dollars that we’re giving back to America,” Coleman said. “And, you know, America’s sons and daughters aren’t abroad in the Middle East. They’re home.”

Qatar, in particular, has invested heavily on Al Udeid in recent years, spending as much as $1.8 billion to renovate the base, the largest in the region, capable of housing more than 10,000 U.S. troops. Thus, shifting focus away from it may seem as a sort of loss on investment on Qatar’s side.

This is actually a development that leads to the consideration that the US and its allies may, in fact, be considering the highly likeliness of a war in the Middle East against Iran, showing the urgency of this shift of command capability.



Russian Federation – Minister for Foreign Affairs Addresses General Debate, 74th Session


September 27, 2019

Sergey Lavrov, Minister for Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation, addresses the general debate of the 74th Session of the General Assembly of the UN (New York, 24 – 30 September 2019).

Transcript :

28 September 201900:13
Statement by H.E. Mr. Sergey Lavrov, Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation, at the 74th session of the UN General Assembly, New York, September 27, 2019

Unofficial translation

Distinguished Mr. President,

Ladies and Gentlemen,

The 75th anniversary of the United Nations which was established as a result of the Victory in World War II and the realization of the need for a collective mechanism to maintain international peace and security, is getting closer. Regrettably, the events of the Cold War, which started soon after, prevented this tremendous creative potential from being unleashed.

The hope arose again almost 30 years ago when the Berlin Wall symbolizing confrontation of the two irreconcilable systems fell. It was the hope for the possibility to finally turn the grievous pages of wars – not only hot but also cold – and to join efforts for the benefit of all mankind.

However, we have to admit – although World War III was prevented thanks to the UN, the number of conflicts on the planet has not declined and enmity has not weakened. New most acute challenges emerged – international terrorism, drug trafficking, climate change, illegal migration, the growing gap between the rich and the poor. It is getting harder to address these and many other challenges from year to year. The fragmentation of international community is only increasing.

In our view, the reason for the current state of affairs lies, first and foremost, in the unwillingness of the countries which declared themselves winners in the Cold War to reckon with the legitimate interests of all other states, to accept the realities of the objective course of history.

It is hard for the West to put up with its weakening centuries-long dominance in world affairs. New centers of economic growth and political influence have emerged and are developing. Without them it is impossible to find sustainable solution to the global challenges which can be addressed only on the firm basis of the UN Charter through the balance of interests of all states.

Leading Western countries are trying to impede the development of the polycentric world, to recover their privileged positions, to impose standards of conduct based on the narrow Western interpretation of liberalism on others. In a nutshell, “we are liberals, and we can do anything”. Pursuing these aspirations, the West is less frequently recalling international law and more often and importunately dwelling upon the “rules-based order”.

The aim of such a concept is obvious – to revise the norms of international law which no longer suit the West, to substitute it for the “rules” adjusted to its self-serving schemes which are elaborated depending on the political expediency, and to proclaim the West and only the West as an indisputable source of legitimacy. For instance, when it is advantageous, the right of the peoples to self-determination has significance and when it is not – it is declared “illegal”.

In order to justify revisionist “rules” the West resorts to manipulation of public consciousness, dissemination of false information, double standards on human rights, suppression of undesirable media, bans on practicing journalism. Moreover, the West got “apt students” among its wards on the post-Soviet territory.

Instead of equal collective work, closed formats beyond legitimate multilateral framework are being created, and approaches agreed upon behind closed doors by a narrow group of the “select few” are then declared “multilateral agreements”. This is accompanied by the attempts to “privatize” the secretariats of international organizations, to use them in order to advance non-consensual ideas in circumvention of universal mechanisms.

Attacks on international law are looming large. The US withdrawal from the JCPOA endorsed by UNSC Resolution 2231 is broadly discussed. Washington not just repudiated its obligations enshrined in this Resolution but started demanding from others to play by American “rules” and sabotage its implementation.

The United States set a tough course for abolishing the UN resolutions on international legal framework of the Middle East settlement. It suggests waiting for some “deal of the century”, meanwhile it has taken unilateral decisions on Jerusalem and the Golan Heights. A two-state solution to the Palestinian issue – which is essential for satisfying the legitimate aspirations of the Palestinian people and providing security for Israel and the whole region – is under threat.

Apparently, when NATO members were bombing Libya blatantly violating the UNSC resolution, they were also guided by the logic of their “rules-based order”. It resulted in the destruction of Libyan statehood, and international community is still disentangling the disastrous repercussions of NATO’s adventure with African countries affected the most.

“Hidden agendas” in countering terrorism remain – despite the universally binding Security Council decisions on listing terrorist organizations, some countries made it a “rule” to cover terrorists and even to engage in cooperation with them on the ground as it is happening, for instance, in Afghanistan, Libya, and Syria. The United States has already been saying it loud that Hayat Tahrir al-Sham is a rather moderate structure which “can be dealt with”. As recent discussions on the situation in the Syrian Idlib showed, the United States wants to induce members of the UNSC to such unacceptable logic.

The West also has its own “rules” regarding the Balkans where it is pursuing an open course for undermining the UNSC decisions on Kosovo and Bosnia and Herzegovina settlement.

Universal conventions together with the SC resolutions are an integral part of international law. The West would like to substitute even them for its “rules” as it happened in the OPCW whose Technical Secretariat was illegally granted “attributive” functions through unlawful manipulations and unscrupulous pressure in direct violation of the Chemical Weapons Convention and exclusive prerogatives of the Security Council.

Playing with Conventions obliging all countries to provide linguistic, educational, religious and other rights of national minorities continue. Even here our Western colleagues are guided by their “rules” – they turn a blind eye to the open denial of national minorities’ relevant rights and indulge the retaining of an ignominious phenomenon of statelessness in Europe.

The course for the revision of international law is more frequently observed in the persistent policy of rewriting the history of World War II, justifying an increasing number of manifestations of neo-Nazism, vandalism against the monuments to the liberators of Europe and Holocaust victims.

The key principles of the UN Charter – non-interference in internal affairs, non-use of force or the threat of force – are also undergoing durability tests.

We are now facing the attempts to add Venezuela to the list of countries whose statehood was destroyed before our eyes through aggression or coups inspired from abroad. Like the overwhelming majority of the UN members, Russia is rejecting the attempts to return the “rules” dating back to the times of Monroe Doctrine to Latin America, to change from outside regimes in sovereign states descending to the methods of military blackmail, unlawful coercion and blockade as it happens in relation to Cuba in defiance of the UN resolutions.

Next year marks the 60th anniversary of the Declaration on the Granting of Independence to Colonial Countries and Peoples adopted at the initiative of our country. However, a number of Western states are still clinging to the old “rules”, ignoring this Declaration and other decisions of the General Assembly on decolonization addressed directly to them, while keeping former overseas territories under their control.

This November marks another anniversary – 20 years since the adoption of the Charter for European Security and the Platform for Co-operative Security. These documents set out principles of cooperation for all countries and organizations in the Euro-Atlantic region. Heads of states and governments solemnly declared that no one should provide his own security at the expense of other’s security. Regrettably, the consensus reached back then today is substituted for taken as a “rule” NATO practice, the organization which continues thinking in terms of searching for enemies, while moving its military infrastructure to the East to the Russian borders and increasing its military budgets, although they already exceed the Russian one more than 20 times. We call on NATO to return to the agreements on shaping equal and indivisible security in the OSCE area. Recently, responsible European politicians have been speaking in favor of it, which, in particular, was demonstrated during the meeting of the Presidents of the Russian Federation and France in August.

The Asia-Pacific region needs a reliable and open architecture. It is dangerous to yield to the temptation and divide it into conflicting blocs. Such attempts will contradict the task to join efforts of all countries in the region in order to effectively address the continuing threats and challenges there, including the task to resolve a whole range of issues on the Korean Peninsula exclusively by peaceful means.

Actions taken by the United States, which, following its withdrawal from the ABM Treaty, destroyed the INF Treaty with the overwhelming support of all NATO members, caused a huge damage to the global system of strategic stability which had been established for decades. Now the United States is questioning the future of the New START Treaty, refusing to ratify the CTBT. Moreover, it has lowered the threshold for the use of nuclear weapons in its doctrinal documents. The United States is setting course for transforming cyberspace and outer space into the arena for military confrontation.

In order to prevent further escalation of tensions, Russia proposed several initiatives. President Vladimir Putin announced the decision not to deploy land-based intermediate-range and shorter-range missiles in Europe or other regions if and as long as the Americans refrain from doing it. We called on the United States and NATO to join such a moratorium. We have also repeatedly suggested Washington that we start negotiations on prolonging the New START Treaty. Together with China we support the harmonization of a legally binding document on the prevention of an arms race in outer space. So far, the reaction of the United States and its allies has not been encouraging.

We are alarmed by the protracted lack of answer to our proposal made to American colleagues already a year ago – to adopt a high-level Russian-American statement on unacceptability and inadmissibility of the nuclear war which by definition cannot have a winner. We call on all countries to support this initiative.

Today I would like to make an announcement – at the current session of the General Assembly we are introducing a draft resolution on Strengthening and Developing the System of Arms Control, Disarmament and Non-Proliferation Agreements. We invite everyone to conduct substantial talks. The adoption of the resolution would greatly contribute to the creation of conditions for a successful hosting of another NPT Review Conference next year.

Russia will continue to work persistently in order to strengthen universal security. In this sphere, we are acting with utmost responsibility, exercising restraint in enhancing defence capacity – obviously, without any damage to the effective delivery of national security and in full compliance with international law.

We support the consolidation of efforts to combat international terrorism under the auspices of the UN. In the interests of mobilizing the potential of regional organizations to suppress the terrorist threat Russia initiated a Ministerial meeting of the Security Council with the participation of the Collective Security Treaty Organization (CSTO), the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), and the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS).

Among the most critical tasks of the world community is elaboration of generally acceptable approaches to the digital sphere management and understanding of the processes related to the creation of artificial intelligence. Last year, the General Assembly endorsed the beginning of the substantive work on discussing the rules of the responsible conduct of states in information space. Resolution on Combating Cybercrime was adopted at Russia’s initiative. It is important to work for achieving legally binding agreements on all aspects of international information security.

We need to step up efforts to facilitate the settlement of numerous crises and conflicts in all regions of the world. The main point is to seek compliance with already existing agreements from parties without allowing them to invent pretexts to refuse from implementing obligations already taken during negotiations. This also concerns conflicts on the post-Soviet territory, including the need to strictly follow the provisions of the Minsk Package of Measures to settle the crisis in the East of Ukraine.

In Syria, where major success in combating terrorism has been achieved, further advancement of the political process lead by the Syrians with the assistance of the UN is at the forefront. With the decisive contribution of Russia, Turkey, and Iran as guarantors of the Astana format, the establishment of the Constitutional Committee has been finished, which was announced by the UN Secretary-General António Guterres a few days ago. Post-conflict reconstruction and creation of conditions for the return of the refugees are the items on the agenda. Here the UN system is to play an important role.

Yet, on the whole, the Middle East and North Africa still face many challenges. We witness what is happening in Libya and Yemen. Prospects for the Palestinian settlement are on the verge of collapse. Efforts to play the “Kurdish card” – which is combustible for many countries – are alarming.

The Persian Gulf region is facing artificial escalation of tensions. We call on overcoming the existing disagreements through dialogue without baseless accusations. On our part, we made a contribution having presented this summer the renewed Russian concept of the collective security in this region.

Supporting the efforts of the African states to put an end to conflicts on their continent, yesterday Russia organized the meeting of the Security Council on strengthening peace and security in Africa. At the end of October, Sochi will host the first ever Russia-Africa Summit. We hope its outcomes will help increase the effectiveness of addressing modern challenges and threats and of work to overcome the problems of development African countries are facing.

The reform of the SC is aimed at improving the UN anti-crisis and peacekeeping activities. Given the realities of the multipolar world, the main task is to find a formula which would correct an obvious geopolitical imbalance in its current composition and would ensure increased representation of African, Asian, and Latin American countries in the Council with the broadest possible agreement of the UN Member States.

Ladies and Gentlemen,

Dividing lines are harmful not only to the world politics but also to the economy. Its inclusive growth is curbed as a result of the WTO norms being substituted for other “rules” – methods of unfair competition, protectionism, trade wars, unilateral sanctions, and open abuse of the American dollar status. All this leads to the fragmentation of the global economic space, negatively affects people’s standards of living. We believe it necessary to get back to the substantial work both in the UN system organizations and in the G-20. To this end, we will contribute to the creation of favorable conditions, including through the opportunities offered by BRICS, where Russia will assume the chairmanship in 2020.

Together with other like-minded countries we support the harmonization of integration processes. This philosophy lies at the core of President Vladimir Putin’s initiative of the Greater Eurasian Partnership involving the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU), SCO, ASEAN, and which is open to all other Eurasian states, including the EU countries. We have already started moving in this direction by interconnecting development plans of the EAEU and the Chinese Belt And Road Initiative. Consistent implementation of these endeavors will contribute not only to increasing economic growth but also to laying a solid foundation in order to form the territory of peace, stability, and cooperation from Lisbon to Jakarta.

Ladies and Gentlemen,

In the run-up to the next anniversary of the United Nations, I would like to underline – the UN-centered system of the world order, despite all trials, is stable and has a great margin of safety. It is a kind of a safety net which guarantees – if the UN Charter is respected – a peaceful development of mankind through finding a balance of sometimes rather contradictory interests of various countries.

At the outcome of these 75 years the main conclusion is probably that the experience of de-ideologized cooperation of states at the face of common threat, gained in the years of that most severe war, is still relevant.

Today’s challenges and threats are no less dangerous.

Only working together we will be able to effectively address them. Half a century ago a prominent scientist and public figure, the Nobel Prize Laureate Andrei Sakharov wrote the following – The division of mankind threatens it with destruction. If mankind is to get away from the brink, it must overcome its divisions It was the unity which was considered the key task of the UN by its Founding Fathers. Let us be worthy of their legacy and memory.

اليمن فرصة العالم لتفادي التصعيد

سبتمبر 25, 2019

ناصر قنديل

– تكشف كلمة الرئيس الأميركي دونالد ترامب أمام الجمعية العامة للأمم المتحدة، درجة الصعوبة في النزول عن الشجرة بعدما بلغ التصعيد مرحلة متقدّمة، رغم التأكيد على تراجع خيار الحرب في الحسابات الأميركية، لكنها تكشف معادلة ربط بها الرئيس ترامب رفع العقوبات عن إيران وهي ما وصفه بتغيير إيران لسلوكها، وليس التوصل معها عبر المفاوضات إلى اتفاق نووي جديد. وبالمقابل تبدي إيران استعداداً لثنائية تتمثل، من جهة بمد اليد لدول الخليج بمبادرة لحفظ الأمن تتضمن بنوداً عدة، قد لا تشكل كلها فرصاً للتلاقي، لكن الرئيسي فيها يبقى الدعوة لوقف الحرب على اليمن وفتح الباب للحل السياسي فيه، وإعلان إيراني تفصيلي عن الاستعداد للمساهمة في هذا الحل. ومن جهة ثانية أعلنت إيران الاستعداد لقبول إضافات وتفاصيل على الاتفاق النووي إذا عادت واشنطن إلى صيغة الخمسة زائداً واحداً بعد رفع العقوبات.

– لا ينتظر الأميركيون بالتأكيد لبلوغ لحظة تتناسب مع معيار تغيير السلوك لرفع تدريجي للعقوبات، تغييراً في موقف إيران من كيان الاحتلال، وهم يعلمون أن في ذلك استحالة. والمنطقي طالما ساحة الاشتباك هي الخليج أن يكون ما ينتظرونه خليجياً، والأكيد أنهم لا ينتظرون من إيران القوية والمقتدرة تنازلاً بل تقديم منصة تتيح الذهاب لتسوية يملك كل فريق أن يوصفها تغييراً في سلوك الفريق الآخر، والساحة الخليجية التي تختزن قضايا متفجرة كملف النفط والحشود العسكرية، تختزن أيضاً قضية بلغت سقف قدرة العالم على التحمل، وهي الحرب الظالمة التي تشنها السعودية والإمارات على اليمن، والتي سبق للأميركيين أن بادروا على جبهتها، سعياً للتهرب من تداعياتها عليهم، بفتح باب التفاوض غير المباشر مع أنصار الله، تسليماً بكونهم طرفاً إقليمياً فاعلاً وبفشل الرهان على الحرب لكسر إرادتهم، ما يعني جهوزية أميركية إيرانية لتحويل ملف الحرب اليمنية إلى مدخل جدي لمسار معاكس.

– ما شهده الملف السوري من إقلاع الخطوة الأولى نحو الحل السياسي من بوابة اكتمال عقد اللجنة الخاصة بالسدتور، يقول إن التوافق من موقع الاختلاف ممكن، وإنه حيث تستعصي تسويات التراضي يمكن فتح الباب لتسويات التغاضي. فالأميركيون الذين لم يكونوا شركاء مباشرين في تشكيل اللجنة الدستورية لسورية، طرف يملك حق الفيتو على كل خطوة أمميّة، وما كان للجنة أن تبصر النور بدونهم، ومثلهم الإيرانيون كشركاء كاملين في مسار أستانة. وهذه بداية تسوية بالتغاضي قابلة للتعميم على اليمن، بمعادلة وقف استهداف العمق السعودي مقابل فتح مطار صنعاء، كنقطة انطلاق لإحياء المسار السياسي، الذي سيعني عملياً فرصة لتراجع أميركي عن حزمة العقوبات الأخيرة تحت شعار أن إيران تغير سلوكها، وفرصة لقبول إيران بالتفاوض مع الأميركيين بدعوة فرنسية لأطراف معادلة الخمسة زائداً واحداً، والبحث بالإضافات والتفاصيل التي قال الإيرانيون إنهم مستعدون لها، وبالتوازي قيام أوروبا بما عليها من موجبات في الاتفاق النووي تطلبها إيران لوقف التصعيد.

– ما لم يحدث هذا، وأغلبه صار مسؤولية سعودية، فإن جولة تصعيد كبرى تنتظر، سيكون ما جرى مجرد تمهيد لها، وسيكون عنوانها تخبزوا بالفراح .

Related Videos


Related Articles

Criminal insanity



The worst thing for the Saudis isn’t that the Houthis managed the attack – which raises a lot of issues, with the bonus of Schadenfreude – but that the Houthis managed the attack from a base in a Shi’ite area of Saudi Arabia itself!

Added: How the Houthis overturned the chessboard” (Escobar):

“The situation has now reached a point where there’s plenty of chatter across the Persian Gulf about a spectacular scenario: the Houthis investing in a mad dash across the Arabian desert to capture Mecca and Medina in conjunction with a mass Shiite uprising in the Eastern oil belt. That’s not far-fetched anymore. Stranger things have happened in the Middle East. After all, the Saudis can’t even win a bar brawl – that’s why they rely on mercenaries.”


“My conversations with sources in Tehran over the past two years have ascertained that the Houthis’ new drones and missiles are essentially copies of Iranian designs assembled in Yemen itself with crucial help from Hezbollah engineers.”

Exhibition of Houthi military-industrial achievements” (The Saker, from July, so it is not like MbS had no warning).

Tweet (Scott Ritter):

The Houthi spent less than $100,000 to cripple 50% of Saudi oil production, easily repaired. If the US/Saudi Team opts to attack Iran, Iran will take out 100% of Saudi oil production, never to be full repaired. That would be the death of the al-Saud family, which means no war.

I hope Bibi manages to pull off another deal with another devil, as he has been a spectacular success, despite some superficial nonsense, in wrecking the Zionist project.  I believe the deep reason for his current problems is his failure at the long-term project of killing people and stealing their land, which is after all the quintessence of the Khazars.  You have to wonder if Bibi’s failure with Putin – another classic Bibi Hail Mary, so to speak, to prove how essential he is to the killing and land theft – was the factor which decided the election:  “Russia prevents Israeli airstrikes in Syria” (Okbi) (see also).

Trudeau in blackface (which the Canadian media was calling ‘brownface’, for some reason):  “Photos surface of Justin Trudeau wearing black makeup at two previous events” (Carrigg).  He had just finished announcing a campaign promise that would amount to a form of guaranteed annual income for low-income parents:  “Roundup: Sweetening the newborn benefits”.  The deal is that the more pressure is on the Liberals, the more they will be inclined to move left, so we need to see a lot more of this kind of thing.  Canada has oodles of money to spend on Canadians; the Liberals just have to be forced to get around their ‘donors’ disinclination to do so.

We’re reached the ‘blame the third-world pilots’ level of the Boeing PR campaign (which was the first approach as well):  “Langewiesche: “What Really Brought Down the Boeing 737 Max?”” (Sailer).  Unstated is the reason the US uniquely has all these kick-ass pilots who can fight through incompetent Boeing engineering and ergonomics – the skills learned in dropping bombs on wedding parties and other brown people in fighting the infinite number of Wars For The Jews (the slogan should be, as always:  ‘Khazars, are there no limits to what they do for us?’).  Of course, also unstated is that the FAA – ‘captured’ by Boeing, as they say in the study of administrative law – is as equally guilty for the problem as Boeing, and is now given the task to provide the PR basis to allow Boeing to ‘fix’ the problem partly created by the FAA, without noticing the problem.  It remains a mystery of why any non-American airlines would have anything to do with this shambles.

Why on Earth Would the US Go to War with Iran over an Attack on Saudi Oil Refineries?” (Lindorff).  Lots of questions like this that we’re not supposed to even think about.  Like, why would the US spend trillions of dollars of wealth and basically wreck itself as a country all so 2% of its population can have an arguably slightly better chance of killing people and stealing their land?  These questions are why we need to realize that American politics is run through the blackmail of American politicians by Jewish gangsters.

Ha ha ha ha ha, ‘editing error’:  “Mish Blasts NYT Kavanaugh Smear: “Editorial Mistake My Ass””.  There must be some kind of JYT hot key which automatically produces ‘pushed his penis into her hand’ which was accidentally hit, and nobody actually read the article in editing it!  The funniest/saddest thing is that this kind of serial lying completely defangs any political reality that might have existed behind the piece.

Ladies and Gentlemen, I’m proud to announce the winner of the prestigious Khazar of the Year Award:  “MIT scientist RESIGNS after he appeared to defend Jeffrey Epstein and claimed sex assault victim Virginia Giuffre was likely ‘entirely willing’ in alleged rape case” (Saunders) and “Renowned MIT Scientist Defends Epstein: Victims Were ‘Entirely Willing’” (Montgomery) and “Remove Richard Stallman” (Selam G.).  #Metoo, that most anti-Semitic of programs, doesn’t seem to have registered at all.  In fact, the whole concept of ‘consent’ seems utterly baffling to the Khazars.  No matter how sophisticated they might seem, they have demonstrated time and time again (see also, Dersh) that they are an extremely primitive people.

Khazars, are there no limits to what they do for us?:  “B.C. going after family behind OxyContin producer Purdue Pharma” (Vikander). Hard to pierce that corporate veil unless there was a scheme to avoid creditors (which there clearly was).

Israel Spies and Spies and Spies” (Giraldi).  So blackmailed you can’t even acknowledge it when they are caught red handed!

US Attorney General Barr invokes “state secrets” to cover up Saudi involvement in 9/11″ (Grey).  Oh, come on, this is part of the weird dance of the seven veils going back to Bob Graham!  Much as I hate the Saudis, they were patsies used to cover American government involvement and to provide some pressure on the Saudi government should it be needed.  The CIA/State Department were handing out visas like candy to fake identity ‘Saudis’ through the US consulate in Jeddah:  “Visas for Al Qaeda: CIA Handouts That Rocked The World – An Insider’s View.” (Springmann/Faulkner).

One thing about these beshekeled ‘journalists’ in the (((media))), constantly shilling for Wars For The Jews, is that they have absolutely no self-awareness, and haven’t learned a thing:  tweet (Max Blumenthal) (Werleman’s shtick is that he is ‘anti-Islamophobic’):

A dunderheaded ex-Islamophobe who cheered on genocidal Salafi-jihadis rampaging through Syria wants to ruin our lives for diverging from the NATO/Qatari/AKP line. Watch how @cjwerleman nearly ruined his own with countless instances of blatant plagiarism:

The little victory tour through Syria of some of the woke journalists is making the al Qaeda/ISIS shills really mad.

‘Hunter Wallace’ continues his attacks on The Daily Stormer, Anglin, and, in particular, weev, and  The Stormer did go offline but is back again (the paradox for Anglin is he can save the site if he denounces weev, but seems to need weev to run and finance the site):

  1. Daily Stormer Goes Offline”;
  2. Daily Stormer: Andre Anglin’s Jailbait Girlfriend”;
  3. Daily Stormer: Weev’s History As An “Anti-Semite Hunter””;
  4. Daily Stormer: The iProphet Rabbi Weevlos”;
  5. Daily Stormer: Response To Infostormer”;
  6. Daily Stormer: When Did You Realize Daily Stormer Was A Fake Website?”
  7. Pity The Stormer”: and;
  8. Ahab: Azzmador Was Chanting “Free Dylann Roof” At Charlottesville”.

Tweet (Samael):

Is it just me or does the irish president look like danny devito playing bernie sanders

الدور الإقليمي «الإسرائيلي» في «محنة أفيفيم»!

Image result for ‫أفيفيم‬‎

سبتمبر 5, 2019

د. وفيق إبراهيم

يُطبّقُ الكيان الإسرائيلي منذ استيلائه على كامل فلسطين المحتلة بين 1948 و1967 نظرية القتال الهجومي على أراضي الدول العربية المجاورة، فيحتلّ قسماً منها مثيراً الاضطراب في كياناتها السياسية من دون أن يُصاب الداخلُ «الإسرائيلي» بأيّ ضرر.

هذا ما نفذه في حرب 1967 عندما احتلّ شبه جزيرة سيناء المصرية وأراضي سورية في الجولان وقسماً من لبنان والأردن مستولياً على الضفة الغربية التي كانت تحت السيادة الأردنية.

وكرّر الأمر نفسه في 1973 بتركيز الحرب في الجولان وسيناء عابراً قناة السويس نحو أراضٍ مصرية جديدة.

أما النتيجة في تاريخه فبدت كارثية، يكفي أنّ مصر السادات انسحبت من الصراع العربي ـ «الإسرائيلي» في اتفاقية كمب ديفيد 1979 فاستعادت سيناء بالمقابل، إنما من دون ثرواتها من الغاز الذي استمرّت «إسرائيل» بنهبها بموافقة مصرية مع شرط آخر وهو حظر دخول الجيش المصري إليها إلا بأعداد صغيرة جداً على أن ترعى الأمن فيها قوات من الشرطة والأمن، فيما بقي الجولان محتلاً لرفض الدولة السورية المساومة عليه، وكذلك لبنان.

ما عزّز من آمال الكيان المحتلّ بتوسيع أدواره «السياسية» هو ذلك المنتحل صفة «ربيع عربي» فاعتقدت «إسرائيل» أنّ تفتيت سورية والعراق بواسطته هو الوسيلة الناجعة لبناء دور إقليمي لها سياسياً واقتصادياً يضع إمكاناتها العسكرية في خدمة أنظمة الثروات النفطية والغازية والاستهلاكية.

لكنها أصيبت بهلع بنيوي لرؤيتها الدول الوطنية في سورية والعراق وهي تستعيد سيادتها بالقوة العسكرية في وجه إرهاب كوني مدعوم من الأميركيين وحلفائهم الدوليين والإقليميين والإسرائيليين بالغارات الدائمة والدعم التسليحي واللوجستي.

كما بُوغتت بقوة حزب الله الذي استطاع تلبية الميدان السوري عسكرياً، فيما لم تَغفُلُ عيناه عن جنوب لبنان ناشراً ثقافته السياسية بالمقاومة على مدى عربي وإسلامي وازن، وكذلك إيران التي تجابه «إسرائيل» بالدعم العسكري لحلفائها في الشرق وفلسطين المحتلة، وتعطي لهذا الصراع أبعاداً ايديولوجية بين فكر محلي مقاوم وآخر استعماري له أذنابه في المنطقة.

لذلك تتعرّض إيران لأعنف حصار معروف منذ نصف قرن تقريباً بسبب عدائها الجذري للكيان الإسرائيلي كما يندرج اليمن في هذا المعطى مؤدّياً دوراً هاماً وضاغطاً في التصدّي لعدوان سعودي عليه يتواصل منذ خمس سنوات.

بدوره العراق لم يبخل بالتصدّي لهذا الربيع المزعوم ضارباً الإرهاب على معظم مساحاته بشكل لم يتبقّ إلا زوايا تحتلها تركيا وتسيطر عليها قواعد أميركية تحمي بؤر الإرهاب قربها.

لم يعجب هذا الوضع الأميركيين والإسرائيليين وحلفاءهم في الخليج، فحاولوا تأمين دور إقليمي لـ «إسرائيل» بالغارات الجوية محدّدين مداه الى حيث تصل مقاتلاتهم الحربية من أعالي اليمن الى قلب بيروت مروراً بإيران والعراق وسورية.

هذا ما أرادته «إسرائيل» من غاراتها الأخيرة على سورية والعراق والضاحية الجنوبية في لبنان. وهو التعويض عن تراجعات المشروع الأميركي الإرهابي في الشرق الأوسط وإعادة تأسيس دور إقليمي جديد أميركي «إسرائيلي» يتولى الكيان المحتلّ فيه الاستهداف الجوي، فيربح في السياسة من دون ان يخسر جنوداً فيما تتولى القوات الأميركية جانب أمن الملاحة من هذا الدور الإقليمي، ومسألة الاتفاق النووي الإيراني لضبط التطور الإيراني لناحية الدور الإقليمي والتحالفات الدولية.

لذلك فإنّ الدور الإقليمي الإسرائيلي توسّل شعار ضرب الصواريخ الدقيقة لإضفاء شرعية على غاراته.

بدورهم اخترع الأميركيون حكاية امن الملاحة في الخليج والخطر النووي الايراني لنثرِ صدقية على إرهاصاتهم الاستعمارية.

من جهتها، تصدّت إيران بإسقاط مسيّرة أميركية حديثة جداً وأسرت ناقلة نفطٍ بريطانية، ويتهمها الأميركيون بتفجير واصابة ناقلات نفط اخرى في مياه الخليج.

ماذا على مستوى الصواريخ الدقيقة؟

سورية المنهمكة بقتال إرهاب كوني تاريخي ودول استعمارية تؤدّي دوراً بطولياً تعطي الأولوية فيه للأكثر خطورة على مراحل تدريجية في تحركاتها السياسية.

فالتزم حزب الله التصدّي المباشر للدور الإقليمي الجديد للكيان الإسرائيلي، خصوصاً بعد محاولة قصف أهداف له في الضاحية الجنوبية، ومخازن للحشد الشعبي ومواقع في سورية.

هذا ما يؤكد أنّ قصف حزب الله لمدرّعة إسرائيلية في مستوطنة «أفيفيم» هو عمل عسكري بأبعاد سياسية واستراتيجية ضخمة.

بداية، لا شك في أنه استهداف للجيش الإسرائيلي يجعله مكشوفاً بشكل مباشر في كامل مناطقه المتاخمة للبنان، وهذا ليس جديداً لأنّ التجاور الجغرافي موجود منذ 1948 وخرقه حزب الله في الـ 2006 بصاروخ على تل أبيب في ردّ على قصف الضاحية في تلك المرحلة.

ما هو جديده إذاً؟

إنه ينقل الصراع العربي ـ «الإسرائيلي» الى داخل فلسطين المحتلة متسبّباً بواحد من أمرين: الأول بفتح «إسرائيل» حرباً شاملة على حزب الله وسورية لتستعيد قواعد الاشتباك التاريخية القديمة ايّ القتال في الأراضي فقط، وهذا ما لم يعد ممكناً للجهوزية السورية الكبيرة واحترافية حزب الله في القتال الذي يجمع بين الأسلوبين الشعبي والكلاسيكي، اما الأمر الثاني فهو سقوط محاولات بناء دور إقليمي جديد لـ «إسرائيل» وعودتها الى حدود فلسطين المحتلة وهو خيار له مخاطره على استمرارية «إسرائيل» في احتلال فلسطين المحتلة، بما يؤكد انّ قذائف حزب الله على «أفيفيم» لها أبعاد استراتيجية ضخمة قد ترسم ملامح الصراعات المقبلة مع الكيان المحتلّ، بما يؤكد انّ حزب الله ذاهب نحو أداء أدوار إقليمية اساسية في منطقة مضطربة يخترع الأميركيون شعارات للاستمرار في احتلالها بالتعاون مع الكثير من دولها التي لم تعُد تمثل شعوبها بقدر ما تحتمي بالغرب لحماية عروشها وتيجانها من غضب الشعوب.. وهذا لن يتأخر.

Related Videos

Related Articles

US Bases in the Region: The Precious Catch

By Staff

أهمّ دروس تحرير خان شيخون


أغسطس 24, 2019

ناصر قنديل

– أما وقد حسم الأمر فقد صار وقت التقييم واستخلاص العبر، فلا ينكرنّ أحد أن الرهانات على تعثّر الدولة السورية توزعت على مشارق الأرض ومغاربها، وأنه حيث لا رهانات كانت هناك تساؤلات وانتظارات. فالكل يُجمع على أن إدلب ليست كسواها، وان تجمع عشرات آلاف المسلحين الذين رفضوا التسويات في مناطقهم التي تحرّرت، يجعل الحرب لتحريرها شديدة الضراوة والقسوة محفوفة بالمخاطر والتضحيات والتساؤلات، وأن وجود آلاف الإرهابيين المقطوعي الجذور اليائسين من أي أفق بعد إدلب يمنح كل هذا المشهد القاتم مزيداً من السواد، وأن الحلف المناوئ للدولة السورية مهما ابتعد أو اقترب عن التشكيلات الإرهابية التي تقاتل في إدلب قد اجتاز الخط الأحمر للتعاون معها سابقاً وما عادت لديه مشكلة بإمدادها بكل أسباب الصمود، وأن تركيا التي لانت وتموضعت بعد معارك حلب إنما فعلت ذلك ليس فقط لأنها حسمت أمرها بالعجز عن المضي في المواجهة الكاملة، بل لأنها أرادت الحفاظ على دورها وحضورها في إدلب، وعندما يصبح مصير إدلب في الميزان يجب التريث في إصدار الأحكام حول كيفية تصرف أنقرة، ولا أيضاً في كيفية تصرف موسكو الحريصة على علاقة مميّزة مع أنقرة تبدّلت بين التصادم والتفاهم، واستقرت على سياق إيجابي رغم الخلاف لزمن غير قصير، لذلك كان الانتظار سيد الموقف.

– في كل معارك المنطقة حيث التكامل بين الجبهات واضح، وحيث التداخل بين تأثيرها على بعضها وموازينها أشد وضوحاً، كانت المواجهات ساخنة في الخليج مياهاً ويابسة، وفي اليمن، وفلسطين، ودخل على الخط تسخين العراق من دون مقدّمات، وتمّ بصورة مفاجئة تسخين لبنان، لكن المكان الوحيد الذي بدا أنه سيقول الكلمة الفصل هو خان شيخون، حيث مفتاح الجغرافيا في مصير إدلب،، حيث يمكن تحقيق تغيير في خطوط الجغرافيا من دون سائر جبهات المنطقة. وأما وقد وقع الأمر وانتهى، فمعادل التأثر والتأثير والأوعية المتصلة سيحضر بقوة. وهذا هو التفسير لحركة الرئيس الفرنسي للمسارعة للقاء الرئيس الروسي ومن بعده وزير الخارجية الإيرانية، وزيارة الرئيس التركي القريبة المرتقبة إلى روسيا، والتراجعات الأميركية عن تهديدات الويل والثبور وعظائم الأمور بحقّ لبنان، والجواب بكلمتين، إنه خان شيخون.

– السياق الجديد بات واضحاً بعد الذي جرى وحسم التساؤلات حول الإمكان، ودليل الإمكان هو الوقوع. وما وقع في خان شيخون قابل للتكرار، ولا حاجة لتجارب أخرى للإثبات، فإن عُرض على الطاولة ما يفي بالغرض من التسليم بمكانة روسيا إلى التعامل مع إيران وملفها النووي والعقوبات والملاحة النفطية، إلى الحل السياسي في سورية ومشاريع الحل وإعادة الإعمار، إلى اليمن، إلى العراق، إلى لبنان، إلى فلسطين، ولا أوهام لدى أحد بحلول جذرية بل اعتراف بحقائق القوة التي يتم على أساسها التفاوض، وإلا فالكلمة للميدان كما قالت خان شيخون.

– سيكون صعباً على البعض الاعتراف لكنها الحقيقة المرة عليهم، إنه الجيش السوري الذي لا يُقهر، ومحور المقاومة الذي لا يهزم، وروسيا التي لا تبيع ولا تشتري في المبادئ.

Related Videos

Related News

%d bloggers like this: