يعتبر نشر فيروس كورونا، على مدار عامين، كان عمدياً وليس فجائياً أو صدفة. ولذلك منذ بداية سلسلة مقالاتنا، حتى آخر مقال بعد انفجار الأزمة الأوكرانية، كنا نؤكد أنّ هناك مؤامرة وراء نشر (كوفيد/ 19)، دون إنكار لوجود الوباء، ودون معرفة بالتفاصيل التي تعتبر سرية بطبيعة الحال. ولكن عملاً والتزاماً بقواعد البحث العلمي، وبالمنهج الاستنباطي، الذي من خلاله يتمّ اكتشاف ما وراء الأحداث الظاهرية، تمكنا من كشف أنّ هناك مؤامرة عالمية وراء نشر الوباء. وبالتعمّق في الخطب السياسية للمسؤولين، وقراءة ما بين السطور، فضلاً عن قراءة وتحليل الاتهامات الموجهة من أطراف دولية إلى أطراف أخرى، ومقاصد هذه الاتهامات، تمكنا أيضاً من تأكيد وجود المؤامرة، وأنّ صانعتها الأولى هي الولايات المتحدة. ولذلك سارعَت إلى توجيه الاتهام إلى الصين، باعتبارها الدولة المخيفة لها، حسب تقديرها وأنه يجب عزلها عن العالم، وضرب اقتصادها الذي بدأ في الوصول إلى الموقع الأول عالمياً من خلال المؤشرات المستقرة في عرف الاقتصادات المتقدّمة وقياساتها، مثلما حدث مع دول جنوب شرق آسيا، والمجرم (سوروس) الملياردير اليهودي الأميركي، الذي يتمّ توجيهه لتحطيم أيّ اقتصاد يبدو منافساً للاقتصاد الأميركي والرأسمالي عموماً. ومن ثم تأكدت المؤامرة، وأن صانعة هذه المؤامرة، هي أميركا، ولكن دون معرفة التفاصيل. وقد أوضحنا في المقال السابق دواعي التركيز على أنّ أميركا هي صانعة المؤامرة، من خلال التحليل الاستنباطي.
وكان للتدخل الروسي في أوكرانيا، أن اكتشف الروس معاملَ بيولوجية لتصنيع الفيروسات ومنها فيروس كورونا، ووضعت يدها، على أوراق رسمية تكشف المؤامرة الأميركية على العالم بتصنيع فيروس كورونا، ونشره في العالم لتحقيق أهداف سياسية. وفوجئ العالم بإعلان روسيا عن ذلك رسمياً. ولم تكتف بذلك، بل تقدمت بطلب لمجلس الأمن لعقد جلسة رسمية لمناقشة جريمة الحرب البيولوجية التي خططت لها الولايات المتحدة، وجعلت أراضي أوكرانيا هي المكان المناسب لشن حرب بيولوجية عالمية ضد أعدائها وضد البشرية عموماً.
وعقد مجلس الأمن جلستين في يومين متتاليين، شرح فيهما المندوب الروسي أبعاد الجريمة وأطرافها، وفي المقابل أنكرت أميركا ورفضت الاتهام ومعها بريطانيا. فما كان من روسيا أن طلبت جلسة ثانية بشأن تطوير أميركا لأسلحة بيولوجية على حدودها داخل أوكرانيا، وقام السفير الروسي بالأمم المتحدة، بتسليم وثائق وأدلة في مضبطة الجلسة، تؤكد:
ـ تمويل البنتاغون الرسمي لبرنامج أسلحة بيولوجية واضحة في أوكرانيا.
ـ أسماء الأشخاص والشركات الأميركية المتخصصة بالأدلة والوثائق المشتركة في هذا البرنامج.
ـ أماكن المختبرات في أوكرانيا، وما يتمّ حتى الآن من محاولات لإخفاء الأدلة.
ـ إعلان مفاجأة أخرى من مندوب روسيا، بأماكن المختبرات الأميركية، التي تعمل في تصنيع واختبار الأسلحة البيولوجية في (36) دولة حول العالم، بزيادة (12) دولة عن الجلسة السابقة.
ـ تحديد الأمراض والأوبئة ووسائل إطلاقها والدول التي تتمّ فيها تجربتها، ومتى وأين تمّت التجارب، وبعلم الحكومات في هذه الدول أو بدون علمها.
ـ تأكيد المندوب الروسي، علانية أنّ من ضمن التجارب والآثار، هو الفيروس المسؤول عن الجائحة الحالية، وكم هائل من الخفافيش المستخدمة في نقل هذا الفيروس.
ـ اكتشفت روسيا ضمن حملتها العسكرية في أوكرانيا، أنّ هناك طيوراً مرقمة أنتجتها المختبرات البيولوجية والجرثومية في أوكرانيا، التي تموّلها وتشرف عليها أميركا.
ـ أن هذه الطيور المرقمة، تتحدّد في ضوء دراسة هجرة الطيور، بعد مراقبتها طوال المواسم، ليصبح بمقدور الاخصائيين البيئيين وعلم الحيوان، معرفة خطوط السير التي تسلكها هذه الطيور كلّ سنة في رحلتها الموسمية، ومنها من يسافر من بلد إلى بلد، ومن قارة إلى أخرى. وهنا يأتي دور المخابرات أو التي تحمل خطة شريرة، فيتمّ القبض على مجموعة من هذه الطيور المهاجرة، ويتمّ العمل على ترقيمها وتزويدها بكبسولة جراثيم تحمل شريحة ليتمّ التحكم فيها عن بُعد، عبر كمبيوترات، ثم يعاد إطلاق سراحها لتنضمّ إلى الطيور المهاجرة إلى البلاد التي يتمّ التخطيط للضرر بها. وخلال طيرانها الطويل، يتمّ التقاط مسارها خطوة بخطوة عبر الأقمار الاصطناعية، ويتمّ تحديد مكانها بالضبط، فإنْ أرادوا مثلاً الضرر ببلد معيّن، يتمّ تدمير الشريحة عندما يصبح الطائر في سماء هذا البلد، فتقتل الطائر، ويسقط حاملاً الوباء، فتنتشر الأمراض في تلك البلاد المُراد الضرر بها، وهكذا يكون قد تمّت هزيمة البلد الخصم، من دون أية تكلفة عسكرية أو اقتصادية أو سياسية!!
ولا شك في أنّ هذه جريمة دولية، رفضت منظمة الصحة العالمية، معرفتها بذلك، كما أنّ الصين طالبت بالتحقيق في ذلك، أمام مجلس الأمن.
وبعيداً عن التفاصيل المريرة، فإنه قد تأكد أنّ نشر فيروس كورونا، كان مخططاً له، وعمدياً. ومن ثم فإنّ من ارتكبت هذه الجريمة هي الولايات المتحدة ومعها (36) دولة شاركتها في ذلك لا بدّ من الإفصاح عنها وفضحها، وإخضاع الجميع للمحاكمات جزاءً لما فعلوا، وفي المقدمة أميركا الظالمة، التي تمارس عملاً إجرامياً دولياً. ولا يجب أن تمرّ مؤامرة كورونا بدون جزاء أو عقاب. ومنذ الكشف عن المؤامرة، بدأ الجميع يتراجع عن الالتزام بالإجراءات الاحترازية، سواء الدول أو الأفراد، في أنحاء العالم.
FNA*: Netanyahu was very quick to administrate a lockdown at the outset of the coronavirus outbreak in Israel. Was Covid-19 his only reason for the lockdown?
Gilad: You are tapping here into a crucial aspect of the Covid 19 affair which none of the Western media has been brave enough to look into. As early as March 12, the Israeli PM announced nationwide school closures and urged the formation of an emergency unity government to “save the lives of tens of thousands” of Israelis from the coronavirus, Netanyahu presented a profoundly stark assessment in which there would be “tens of millions of deaths” worldwide unless the pandemic was stopped. Political analysts who follow Netanyahu closely immediately understood that Netanyahu desperately needed the pandemic and the hysteria around it. And it is clear that the Israeli PM managed to utilize the corona crisis to serve his cause. He postponed his trial. He formed a large unity government and practically destroyed both his rival party (Blue & White) and its leader Benny Gantz. So it was no surprise that once Netanyahu was finally able to form his unity government, Israel was relieved of its lockdown: Israelis were free to enjoy the sun again. Far more peculiar is the fact that the rest of us needed Netanyahu to form his government so that our leaders would also allow us to enjoy the blue sky.
FNA: The political deadlock came to an end with the formation of an emergency cabinet to address the coronavirus outbreak. Why did Netanyahu unite with his forever rival Benny Gantz after they competed with him for power for over a year? Why did he make such an abrupt political u-turn?
Gilad: We are often misled into believing that the Jewish state is a pluralist political entity divided between Left and Right political blocks. The truth can’t be further. The Jewish State is a hard-core nationalist entity. It is institutionally discriminatory. It differentiates racially between Jews and the indigenous people of the land.
Though it seemed for a while that the Israeli Knesset was divided between Netanyahu’s block and the so called ‘centre Left block,’ the vast majority of the Knesset Members within the so called Centre Left block are actually to the right of Netanyahu. This applies to Avigdor Lieverman and his party. Many of the Blue & White’s politicians, some of them war criminals, ended up in Netanyahu’s government. Even the Labour party is ardently right wing in its approach to the Israeli Arab conflict. In Israel there is only one left party that upholds universal and ethical philosophy. It is called the United Arab List.
FNA: When all of the courts, including the court in which his case was pending, were closed as a measure to counter the coronavirus outbreak, Netanyahu formed a unity cabinet, became Prime Minister and was granted immunity against the court’s decision in his case. Do you believe that at some point in the future justice will be served, and he will be held accountable for the allegations of bribery and favouritism?
Gilad: I am not so sure how valid or serious the bribery and favouritism allegations are against Netanyahu. I can tell you that Israeli war crimes against Palestinians are by far more grave than Netanyahu’s cigar consumption. I would like to add here that I believe that it was Netanyahu’s early and radical reaction to the coronavirus that defined the tone and policies of many Western governments. Since we still do not know the origin of coronavirus, what it is all about, I tend to believe in the possibility that the current health crisis is the result of a military affair. If there is any basis for such an assumption, Israel amongst just a few other countries is a major suspect. I do believe that the constant havoc that we see in the world at the moment is there to divert attention from crucial questions to do with the crisis and its possible origin.
True scrutiny of the criminal possible aspects involved with the pandemic is overdue, as the notorious virus clearly hasn’t killed as many millions as Netanyahu predicted in early March.
I was planning to write a long article comparing the accountability of the various possible Covid-19 culprits. I thought I would delve into a hypothetical question: who is more guilty of a mass murder – a young scientist who forgot to seal the safety latch of a laboratory coronavirus refrigerator and by failing to do so, exposed humanity to the risk of a viral pandemic, or an epidemiologist and professor who distributes a phantasmic unsubstantiated study that is not fact-based and proved to be grossly incorrect and by so doing, inflicted financial chaos leading to the destruction of the Western economy, contributed to world famine and the possible deaths of millions?
But as soon as I started to delve into it, I gathered that the topic was not as interesting as I hoped. The young scientist was negligent, a relatively minor offence in comparison with the epidemiologist who committed a conscious, wilful act following a process of so-called methodical ‘deliberation.’ The young scientist is guilty of negligence that led to many deaths, the epidemiology professor is, basically, complicit in a crime against humanity.
I realized a more interesting question is why most Western countries failed to take the right decision. Britain is particularly interesting as it initially took what seems now to be the right policy, then made a 180 after it was subject to a media blitz fuelled by the embarrassingly exaggerated ‘predictions’ from a ‘scientific study’ delivered by London Imperial College.
If we want to live in a better world, we may have to delve into the systematic failure of our media, government, dysfunctional political class, and the scientific political technocrats. Considering the crimes that are now committed by our so-called elite, a criminal investigation is likely the only way forward and may be our only hope to survive.
Other intriguing questions have surfaced amidst the Corona crisis. While it is clear why many people supported severe lockdown measures back in February and March, it is far from clear why liberals and progressives are still supporting the ludicrous surrender of our most essential rights to operate freely and make a living? Why do the tech companies stick with a narrative that is becoming increasingly shaky? Why does Facebook deploy its robots to silence anyone who doesn’t agree with the World Health Organization? Why, in the most blatant violation of freedom of speech, has Youtube been removing content and alternative views presented by frontline scientists and medical doctors such as Dr. Erickson’s Covid19 Briefing? For those who don’t remember, just two months ago the same American press, that is now rallying against dissenting American doctors, was criticizing China for silencing its own medical professionals who insisted upon telling the truth. What is it about David Icke’s message that brings to light the true authoritarian nature of Google, Facebook and Twitter? Why are the tech corporations united against those who see 5G as a global menace? Whether the 5G dissenters are right or wrong, there is no health risk to any of us from people who express their thoughts and are upset by radiation.
It may be too depressing to admit that in the West, it is the tech companies, rather than the state, that display the most authoritarian tactics. But they are not alone in this battle. What we see is a broad alliance among the so-called progressives, the liberals and the bitterest Orwellian enemies of freedom and speech rights.
The division we see in contemporary society is not of a socio-economic nature, it is not rich vs. poor, it is not political, it has nothing to do with Left or Right, it is not even cognitive, it is all about Athens and Jerusalem. Athens teaches us how to think for ourselves, while Jerusalem dictates what to think, what to say and who not to listen to. Athens pushes for an Agora: an open marketplace of ideas dominated by tolerance and pluralism while Jerusalem adheres to a set of beliefs, and as is typical with beliefs, the more they are removed from factuality and rationality the stronger the belief happens to be.
It does not come as a surprise to many of us that some progressives and liberals are still very pessimistic, as if they try to save the ridiculously farfetched predictions made by our state ‘scientists’ two months ago. They cling to predictions that have proven to be grossly wrong and by unheard of proportions. I guess that the progressive worldview is not a political position, it is a mental state and it is actually of a very problematic supremacist nature. Progressives are those who believe that those who do not agree with them are somehow inferior: ‘reactionaries’ so to say. To be a progressive is to believe that your view isn’t just right, it is actually superior, scientifically and analytically even if the facts and the rules of logic suggest the opposite.
In my latest book, ‘Being in Time,’ I reached the conclusion that the progressive worldview is probably choseness’ final stage. I guess that my old insight has now materialized into a public awareness. I can only thank Covid-19 for that.
As an intellectual exercise let’s think of an imaginary state, “State A.” Our fictional State A is devastated that 100 of its citizens are infected with Covid-19. For this exercise, we accept that these 100 citizens are representative of State A‘s demography, classes, ethnicities and so on. Apparently, State A’s nightmare is just the beginning because out of its 100 Covid-19 carriers, not one survives the next three weeks.
Let’s now imagine another case, we will call “State B.” State B is similar to state A in terms of its size, population, geography, climate, culture, ethnicity, nutrition, etc. In State B 100 citizens also tested positive for Covid-19. Following the experience of State A, State B braces itself for the possibility that all its infected citizens may perish but then for reasons that are not yet clear to us, no one in state B dies. And if this is not different enough, hardly any of the 100 develop any symptoms.
The crude difference between State A and B may tell us something about the herd immunity in States A and B. It is easy to detect that the ratio created by the number of fatalities (F) divided by the number of those infected (I) is an indication of the level of immunity or ‘herd immunity’ in a given region or a state.
State A: F/I = 100/100=1 State B: F/I = 0/100=0
State A’s immunity ratio equals 1. This means that anyone who contracts the virus in State A will likely die. In state B, on the other hand, one is likely to survive the virus. In fact, they may, without knowing it, have already survived.
But let us now consider some more realistic cases. In “State C,” again, a state similar to A and B, out of 100 who tested Covid-19 positive, 10 people died within the next few weeks.
State C: F/I=10/100=0.1
The herd immunity ratio in State C is 0.1. In terms of herd immunity, State C is far better off than State A as a virally infected subject may benefit from a 0.9 chance to survive. But State C’s situation is not as good as in State B where no one is expected to die as the F/I ratio in State B is O. We can see that the smaller the F/I ratio is, the greater is the herd immunity in a given state or a region.
But let us look at another realistic case. In “State D” out of 100 patients only 1 died within a few weeks.
State D: F/I=1/100=0.01.
This means that in State D the herd immunity is close to perfect. Someone who contracts the Covid-19 virus has only a remote chance that he will lose his life. In other words, the survival rate is 0.99
State C and D are not completely imaginary cases. The F/I ratio in State C is a good representation of the numbers we saw in Northern Italy, NYC, Spain, UK and other vulnerable regions that have suffered heavily in the last few weeks. The ratio in State D is very similar to South Korea and Israel. Though many people are identified with Covid-19 in these two states alone, very few have died.
Such a methodical search for herd immunity ratio may help to identify the survival rate in different states, regions and cities. It may help us to determine policy; to decide who, what and how to lockdown or maybe not to lockdown at all. It can also help to locate the origin and the spreaders of the disease as we have a good reason to believe that the regions with the most immunity to a given viral infection have likely experienced the disease in the past and have developed some form of resistance.
In reality, this model is problematic for many reasons and can hardly be applied. As things stand (in reality), we are comparing data that was collected under different circumstances and using various procedures designed with completely different strategies and philosophies. Both Israel and South Korea, for instance, conducted testing on mass scale and hence, identified many more carriers. More crucially both Israel and S. Korea made a huge effort to identify super spreaders and applied strict isolation measures to those spreaders and those who were infected by them. Britain, USA and Italy on the other hand conducted limited testing and have generally tested those who developed symptoms or were suspected of being infected.
Dr. Erickson COVID-19 Briefing – “millions of cases, small amount of death, millions of cases, small amount of death..”
But there is a far greater problem with the above herd immunity ratio model. It assumes that we know what we are dealing with i.e., an infectious viral situation, while the evidence may point otherwise.
The Radioactive Clock
It has become clear that the health crisis we are facing isn’t consistent with anything we are familiar with. Those who predicted a colossally genocidal plague weren’t necessarily stupid or duplicitous. They assumed that they knew the root cause of the current crisis. They applied recognized models and algorithms associated with viral pandemics. They ended up eating their words, not because their models were wrong but because they applied their models to the wrong event. While no one can deny the alarming exponential growth of the disease, it is the unusual ‘premature’ curve-flattening point and then the rapid decline of infections which no one explained. In fact, some still prefer to deny it.
Many of us remember that our so-called ‘experts’ initially tended to accuse China of ‘hiding the real figures’ as no one could believe that the virus, all of a sudden, pretty much ran out of steam. Some also claimed that Iran was faking its figures to make its regime look better. Then came South Korea and the scientific community started to admit that despite its initial rapid exponential growth, for an unexplained reason, the ‘virus’ seems to run out of energy in an unpredictable fashion: the curve straightens out almost abruptly and starts to drop soon after, almost literally disappearing to the point where even a country as enormous as China passes days without diagnosing a single new Covid-19 carrier.
When Italy experienced its Corona carnage, every health ‘expert’ predicted that when the ‘virus’ slipped out of the rich Lombardy region and made it to the poor south, we would see real genocide. That didn’t happen.
Rarely we see scientists sticking their necks out telling the truth. This interview with Swedish Prof. Johan Giesecke is a must watch!
We have also started to notice that lockdowns have not necessarily saved the situation and that adopting relatively light ‘lockdown’ measures doesn’t translate into a total disaster as Sweden has managed to prove. The ‘virus,’ appears to stop spreading according to its own terms rather than the terms we impose upon it.
Thinking about the anomalies to do with the virus in analytical mathematical terms, as opposed to seeing the virus in biological or medical terms, has made me believe that a paradigm shift may be inevitable. We seem to have been applying the wrong kind of science to a phenomenon that is not really clear to us. This may explain what led a British ‘scientist’ to reach a ludicrous and farfetched estimate that Britain could be heading towards an astronomic death figure of 510.000. Following the same flawed algorithm, Anthony Fauci advised the American president that America could see two million dead. Both scientists were wrong by a factor of 25-40 times. Such a mistake in scientific prediction should be unforgivable considering the damage it inflicted on the world’s economy and its future. One might say that the good news is that our governments are finally listening to scientists, the tragedy, however, is that they are listening to the most idiotic scientists around.
Looking at the tsunami of raw data regarding worldwide spread of Covid 19 reveals a lot, perhaps more than we are willing to admit at this stage. The numbers, the shape of the Corona growth curve and the manner in which it flattens and declines suggests to me that something different may be at play. It seems as if the disease is shaped by an autonomous internal clock that determines its time frame and that it is not impeded by any form of organic resistance such as antibodies or herd immunity. The curve’s rise toward that flattening instant is indeed characterized by consistent and exponential growth. But then, in a seemingly arbitrary manner, the disaster stops its increase and the numbers of those infected by Covid-19 starts to drop.
Looking for such a pattern that produces an exponential growth that comes to a sudden end calls to attention the concepts of radioactivity in general and of the half-life in particular.
Each radioactive isotope has its own decay pattern. The rate at which a radioactive isotope decays is measured in ‘half-life.’ The term half-life is defined as the time it takes for one-half of the atoms of a radioactive material to disintegrate. Radioactive decay is the disintegration of an unstable atom with an accompanying emission of radiation. The change from an unstable atom to a completely stable atom may require several disintegration steps and radiation will be given off at each step.
Half-life is a measurement of time (set by the radioactive isotope) that involves a repeated release of radiation. Each time radiation is released the radioactive isotope is splitting in half, this repeats until it either reaches stability or maybe becomes ineffective. If you bear the half-life dynamic in mind you can see how one person can ‘infect’ or shall I say, radiate an entire stadium a few times over during a two hour football match. All it takes is a radioisotope with a half-life cycle of a few seconds.
Once the atom reaches a stable configuration, no more radiation is given off. For this reason, radioactive sources become weaker with time, as more and more unstable atoms become stable atoms, less radiation is produced and eventually the material will become non-radioactive. I wonder whether this could provide an explanation for the abrupt curve flattening that is associated with Covid-19
What may be possible is that Covid 19 is not the root cause of the current disease, it may instead be a by-product of a radioactive interaction. I am not in any position to substantiate this theory. Instead, I offer an alternative way of thinking about the problem that may shed light on the situation. If Covid-19 is a by-product of radiation, then the sudden decrease in radioactivity due to the nature of half-life reactions can explain why the virus loses its growth energy when it seems as if it has become unstoppable. If this theory has any merit, then we are misdiagnosing the Corona crisis, misapplying the science and implementing the wrong strategies. It may also indicate that herd immunity won’t work, as we are not dealing with a viral infection but instead becoming ourselves, a source of radiation.
This theory may help explain why Israel and South Korea (State D) were so successful in combating the crisis. It wasn’t the lockdown that saved these countries. It was their aggressive search for and quarantine of super spreaders and those who were potentially radiated by them. Consciously or not, rather than stopping the virus they isolated the catalysts that were leading to the creation of the virus.
Our world is in a grave crisis and could benefit from thinkers who are slightly more creative, sophisticated and responsible than the characters who currently occupy the World Health Organisation, the CDC and London’s Imperial College. But more than anything else, I reiterate once again: we need to escalate our response to the Corona crisis into a criminal investigation so we can figure out every possible error or malevolent act that led humanity into the current grim situation .
In this interview I elabore together with Jason Liosatos on the prospect of a Corona paradigm shift, escalating the Coronavirus crisis into a criminal investigation. Is it a bio-lab accident, or may be a bio-weapon mutating into a mass killer? who could and should investigate the possible culprit(s)? I offer some basic mathematical tools that could help to track down and identify the possible origin of the virus. If you regard yourself as a critical being you may enjoy this conversation.
UPROOTED PALESTINIANS: SALAM ALQUDS ALAYKUM 