NYT Reinvented History of War on Libya


The Times operates as a quasi-official ministry of state propaganda, featuring misinformation and Big Lies on major issues mattering most – systematically suppressing what readers need to know.

Its two-part misreporting on US-led NATO’s war on Libya was called “Hillary Clinton, ‘Smart Power’ and a Dictator’s Fall” (Part I) and “A New Libya, With ‘Very Little Time Left’ “ (Part II) – a shameless perversion of truth, an utter disregard for the raping and pillaging of a sovereign independent state, the immiseration of its people.

North Africa’s most developed nation was transformed into a cauldron of endless violence, instability, turmoil, deep poverty, mass unemployment and appalling human misery.

Hillary Clinton’s contemptible October 2011 remark after hearing of Muammar Gaddafi’s death, saying “(w)e came, we saw, he died” will long define her pure evil. A shocking graphic video showed US-supported terrorists sodomized him to death with a knife.

Clinton was directly involved in orchestrating US-led NATO terror-bombing, wanting Libya’s sovereign independence destroyed, its oil wealth pillaged, its people exploited – its popular government providing social services most Americans can’t imagine replaced by US-installed puppets serving its interests.

Claiming Washington’s aim was establishing a democratic Libya was pure subterfuge. Clinton is a notorious war criminal, supporting all US naked aggression during her roles as first lady, US senator and secretary of state.

The Times claiming she “belie(ved) in America’s power to do good in the world” was pure rubbish. Longstanding US imperial policy tolerates no sovereign independent states, wanting them all eliminated by coups or brute force.

Clinton supports US interventionist policy, flagrantly breaching core international law. She declined to be interviewed for The Times report.

Ludicrously in public she said it’s “too soon to tell” how things will turn out in Libya. It’s a failed state, raped and destroyed by US imperial viciousness, human misery afflicting its people, no end of violence and turmoil in sight.

US, UK and French policymakers knew attacking Libya would create the out-of-control conditions affecting the country today.

Endless wars, turbulence and chaos serve US imperial interests. Peace and stability defeat it. Wherever America shows up, dystopian harshness follows.

Conditions following Washington’s intervention in Yugoslavia, Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria, Yemen, Ukraine, Somalia, Libya and elsewhere reflect pure US imperial evil.

The Times claiming Clinton helped orchestrate humanitarian intervention in Libya mocks its US-led rape and destruction.

Times editorial policy endorses all US imperial wars and others planned, ignoring their objectives, mindless of the horrors they inflict.

Protests in Libya preceding US-led NATO aggression were orchestrated in Washington, war planned months in advance. Obama, Clinton and likeminded administration policymakers wanted Gaddafi removed for multiple reasons.

He supported pan-Africanism, a United States of Africa free from imperial domination. He wanted Libyans sharing in the country’s oil wealth, a notion foreign to America and other Western powers.

Under his 1999 Decision No. 111, all Libyans got free healthcare, education, electricity, water, training, rehabilitation, housing assistance, disability and old-age benefits, interest-free state loans, as well as generous subsidies to study abroad, buy a new car, help couples when they marry, practically free gasoline, and more.

Literacy under Gaddafi rose from 20 – 80%. Libya’s hospitals and private clinics were some of the region’s best. Now they’re in shambles.

Vital public services he provided no longer exist. Pre-war, Libyans had African’s highest standard of living. Homelessness was nonexistent.

Gaddafi believed all Libyans had a right to a home or rent-free apartment, notions unheard of in the West.

He rejected farcical Western-style money-controlled so-called democracy, deplored crony capitalism and neoliberal harshness.

During his tenure, women had the right to vote, participate politically, as well as own and sell property independently of their husbands.

Clause 5 of Libya’s 1969 Constitution granted them equal status with men, notably for education and employment.

In January 2011, weeks before US-led NATO naked aggression, the UN Human Rights Council praised Gaddafi’s instituted political, economic, education, social and cultural rights.

It lauded his treatment of religious minorities. He had nothing to do with downing Pan Am 103 over Lockerbie, Scotland in 1988, nor did falsely accused Abdel Basset Ali al-Megrahi.

He called his Great Man-Made River (GMMR) development of an ocean-sized aquifer beneath Libya’s sands the “Eighth Wonder of the World” – wanting all Libyans sharing in its benefits.

Washington and rogue Western partners wanted it privatized for exclusive corporate gain.

Under Gaddafi, the Central Bank of Libya was state-owned, the interest-free Libyan dinar used for productive economic growth, not speculation, profits and bonuses for predatory bankers.

Gaddafi funded Africa’s only communications satellite, saving hundreds of millions of dollars for low-cost incoming and outgoing calls.

He provided two-thirds of the $42 billion needed to launch a public African Central Bank, Monetary Fund and Investment Bank.

He advocated a new gold standard, replacing dollars with gold dinars, aiming to provide real monetary wealth and value, free from predatory Western  lending agencies.

Washington wants dollar hegemony as the world’s reserve currency maintained, an agenda challenged by Russia, China and other nations increasingly trading bilaterally in their own currencies.

In 1977, Gaddafi transformed the Libyan Republic into the Socialist People’s Libyan Arab Jamahiriya – a “state of the masses.”

In 1979, he established direct participatory democracy, devolving power to tribal leaders. In 1986, Libya became the Great Socialist People’s Libyan Arab Jamahiriya.

Gaddafi was no dictator. He was a visionary, a revolutionary leader, wanting Libyan society based on equity, justice and fair distribution of national wealth.

He enjoyed strong popular support. He was a marked man. Washington wanted him eliminated, his progressive anti-Western policies replaced by predatory capitalist rapaciousness.

The deplorable Times report reinvented Clinton’s war on Libya, ignored Gaddafi’s vibrant model social state.

It played a leading role in endorsing US-led naked aggression, misportrayed as humanitarian intervention.

It supports Hillary Clinton, backs her presidential aspirations – instead of exposing her war crimes, denouncing her pure evil, and demanding she be held fully accountable.

Stephen Lendman lives in Chicago. He can be reached at lendmanstephen@sbcglobal.net.

His new book as editor and contributor is titled “Flashpoint in Ukraine: US Drive for Hegemony Risks WW III.”


Visit his blog site at sjlendman.blogspot.com.

Listen to cutting-edge discussions with distinguished guests on the Progressive Radio News Hour on the Progressive Radio Network.

– See more

– See more

Refugee Crisis: EU Cites Missing Libyan Navy It Destroyed in 2011

February 29, 2016 (Tony Cartalucci – NEO) – News agencies are reporting on a Wikileaks report detailing the EU’s “Operation Sophia,” an allegedly covert military operation aimed at stemming the flow of refugees into Europe.

The International Business Times in their report, “WikiLeaks leak ‘classified report’ indicating EU Operation could move into Libyan territory,” would report that:

WikiLeaks has released a “classified report” about the first six months of Operation Sophia, the EU military intervention against refugee boats in Libya and Mediterranean. 

The leaked report is dated 29 January 2016 and written by the operation commander, Rear Admiral Enrico Credendino of the Italian Navy. It allegedly provides statistics on refugee flows and outlines the phases of Operation Sophia, including future strategies of the operation. The report has been published for the European Union Military Committee and the Political and Security Committee of the EU.

Perhaps the most ironic aspect of “Operation Sophia” is the EU’s ultimate exit strategy, creating a functioning Libyan navy capable of policing its own shores. The Times would report:

The report published by WikiLeaks notes that their “exit strategy” involves ensuring that a “well-resourced Libyan Coastguard can protect their own borders and prevent irregular migration taking place from their shores”. It also mentions an “EU comprehensive approach to help secure their invitation to operate inside [Libyan] territory”.

It is particularly ironic that the EU now sorely needs a Libyan navy to police its own coasts because until 2011, it already had one. Some may wonder what happened to that navy. Within the answer lies the irony.

US-EU Destroyed the Navy in 2011 it now Needs to Restore Order Back to the Med 

In broad daylight in the middle of May, 2011, NATO laid waste to three separate locations in the North African nation of Libya. The targets, more specifically, were ports used by the nation’s navy. Several warships would be sunk, among many more that would be destroyed during the conflict. In addition to ships, the facilities supporting them were also utterly destroyed.

Even before the first NATO bomb dropped on Libya in 2011, geopolitical analysts had warned of the refugee crisis that would be triggered along with a variety of other humanitarian and security concerns that would evolve with the destruction of not only the Libyan navy, but the stabilizing effects of the Libyan government itself.

Indeed, many migrants and refugees from across Africa came to Libya to live and work. They were supported by and supporters of the Libyan government, but reviled by US-backed terrorists based in eastern Libya’s Cyrenaica region. During the conflict, the Western media disingenuously depicted these Libyans as “African mercenaries” to account for the subsequent racist genocide carried out by NATO-backed terrorists.

When the terrorists of Benghazi, Derna, and Tobruk finally overran the country with NATO backing, entire cities of Libya’s black population were emptied out either through genocide, into concentration camps, or driven out of the country into neighboring Egypt, Tunisia, and Algeria.

Refugees eventually following those who destroyed and plundered their nation back to the den in which their nation’s future was stolen to, was all but inevitable. NATO’s own terrorist proxies were also expected to leverage the lawlessness of America and Europe’s “new” Libya, turning it into a base for Mediterranean piracy and human trafficking. The US State Department itself, in post-regime change Libya, would go as far as constructing terrorist networks through which weapons and fighters were forwarded to Turkey and onward to Syria and Iraq.

The Destruction of Libya “Uncorked” a Volatile Brew  

If the continent of Africa and the many countries within it subjected to both over and covert Western meddling, exploitation, and subversion was a bottle, Libya was the cork. It provided a means of preventing the pressure building up from various conflicts from exploding into Europe – one of the primacy culprits driving these conflicts. France alone – one of the most vocal nations decrying the “migrant crisis,” currently has troops stationed in African nations including the Central African Republic (2,000), Chad (950), Ivory Coast (450), Djibouti (2,470), Gabon (1,000), Mali (2,000), and Senegal (430).

These nations either constitute, or are bordering those nations producing the most refugees flooding in to Europe with the exception of Syria, which France, along with several other European nations and the United States are bombing and arming terrorists on the ground in, and Afghanistan, occupied by NATO since 2001.

With Europe’s very intentional transformation of Libya from a bastion of stability to a divided and destroyed wasteland, the bottle was uncorked, and the poisonous brew the US and Europe had been developing, exploded like a volcano.

Europe plays the victim of a region-wide conflagration it itself not only intentionally lit, but continuously poured gasoline upon ever since. The missing Libyan navy it itself helped send to the bottom of the Mediterranean being cited as a contributing factor to the severity of the current “migrant crisis” is an indictment of the “international order” the EU and its Transatlantic partners both claim to uphold, and predicated the destruction of Libya and the incremental occupation of the African continent upon. 

For other nations around the world, including Eastern Europe, Russia, and beyond, who played no role in the West’s various wars – or even openly opposed Western military aggression – they have no obligation to take responsibility for refugees created by these wars, thus attempting to wade into the refugee debate in Europe is both unnecessary and unbecoming.

Regardless of how the US and Europe attempt to wield “international law,” it is clear that they are directly responsible for the instability driving millions of people from their homes, and they have intentionally elected to continue destabilizing these regions of the world.

They cannot elect, therefore to avoid the consequences of their meddling, nor demand others to share the burden of these consequences. That the EU desperately seeks the help of a fleet it itself sent to the bottom of the sea illustrates perfectly the self-inflicted nature of this crisis.

Compounding and Exploiting Crisis 

Finally, it should be noted, that the Wikileaks report also indicates that not only does the EU seek to replace a fleet it itself sank in 2011 which led to the crisis in the first place, it is also seeking to expand EU military jurisdiction far beyond EU territory, predicated on a disaster of its own making.

The report states specifically that: 

 It also mentions an “EU comprehensive approach to help secure their invitation to operate inside [Libyan] territory

For Europeans – many of whom were complacent as their respective governments went to war against Libya in 2011 – they must understand that the chaos unfolding in their streets has not only been intentionally created, but is being cynically used to expand the control of special interests both at home and abroad. With the EU’s naval operations extending into Libyan territory, it will be all that much easier to secure and exploit Libya’s coastal oil assets, while keeping the rest of the country divided against themselves and collectively too weak to protect and use their own resources for their own nation’s future.

Unfair hands are being dealt all around. Instead of fighting over who has the worst hand, the world must expose and deal with those who have rigged the deck.

Tony Cartalucci, Bangkok-based geopolitical researcher and writer, especially for the online magazineNew Eastern Outlook”.   

Palestinian Buried After Body Withheld for 65 Days


[Ed. note – Imagine if your loved one is killed. The body is held for 65 days. To get it back you have to agree to hold the funeral at a certain specified time. The only people allowed to attend are those on a list approved by the killers. Oh yes, and to get the body back from the killers, you must also pay them $5,150 as “collateral.” At the time the funeral is held, the killers are there–they show up, right there at the funeral of your loved one! To confiscate all cell phones and cameras of mourners coming to pay their last respects.

Israel claims to be imposing such conditions in order to prevent funerals from being turned into political protests. But of course, holding bodies for weeks on end also allows plenty of time to harvest organs–and specifying when the funeral must take place after the body finally is returned, as well as who is allowed or not allowed to attend,  practically precludes any possibility of an autopsy. Not a single US official, to my knowledge, has voiced a peep of protest against this odious practice of holding bodies for extended periods of time. And of course, it goes without saying no one has broached the issue of organ harvesting, for to do so would immediately result in one’s  being smeared with the charge of “blood libel” and “anti-Semitism”–as happened to the Palestinian observer at the UNwhen he dared raise the matter back in November.

Israel certainly has a history of organ trafficking,  but even if that’s not the modus operandi behind the current practice of cadaver hoarding, still it’s incumbent upon us to ask ourselves: Does any other country in the world have an official policy of refusing to turn over bodies to grieving families? None that I’m aware of.

“Whereas recognition of the inherent dignity and of the equal and inalienable rights of all members of the human family is the foundation of freedom, justice and peace in the world…”

Those are the opening words of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. The Declaration was approved by the United Nations General Assembly in 1948. It makes no mention of organ harvesting. Maybe it should have. But in reading over its preamble and its subsequent 30 articles, one kind of gets the feeling that no one back then could reasonably have conceived of or imagined the coming into existence of a state quite like Israel.]


Ma’an News

JERUSALEM (Ma’an) — Israeli intelligence handed over the body of Musab Mahmoud al-Ghazali to his family for him to be buried on Sunday night, 65 days after he was killed by Israeli soldiers in Jerusalem.

Al-Ghazali, a 26-year-old Palestinian from the occupied East Jerusalem neighborhood of Silwan, was shot dead on Dec. 26 after Israeli police say he pulled a knife on an officer in Allenby Square in Jerusalem.

However, a witness on the scene said that al-Ghazali had not been holding a knife when he was killed.

Al-Ghazali’s family said at the time that the young man suffered from mental disabilities, and denied that he would have carried out an attack. They accused Israeli forces of “executing him in cold blood.”

Al-Ghazali’s body was returned to its family entirely covered in ice due to being kept refrigerated in Israeli custody.

“The family committed to the conditions but Israel did not,” al-Ghazali’s uncle, Majd al-Ghazali, told Ma’an. “The family asked for them to take the body out of the morgue 24 to 48 hours before handing over the body so the ice would melt, but we were shocked that the ice was still on Musab’s body.”

A lawyer for prisoners rights organization Addameer said only 30 people were allowed to attend al-Ghazali’s funeral, which was held with Israeli police and army forces deployed in the area.

Al-Ghazali’s sister, 22-year-old Rawan, was prevented from attending the funeral, as her name was allegedly not mentioned in the list of people allowed to be at the funeral.

“Israel is using the chaos as an excuse that is why they handed him over after midnight, with a list with only 30 attending,” al-Ghazali’s uncle said.

Israeli authorities also prevented any video recording or photography of the body, and seized the cell phones of people attending the funeral, the lawyer added.

Israeli authorities had announced that they would release al-Ghazali’s body three weeks earlier, on Feb. 6.

Al-Ghazali’s family had to comply with strict conditions regarding the time and size of the funeral, as well pay 20,000 shekels ($5,150) as collateral, before Israel released the body. Similar preconditions have been set on the families of other Palestinians whose relatives’ bodies were held by Israeli authorities.

Since a wave of unrest swept the occupied Palestinian territory at the beginning of October, Israel has routinely held the bodies of Palestinians it says were attempting to attack Israelis.

Israel’s Public Security Ministry said in mid-October that the bodies of alleged Palestinians attackers would no longer be returned to their families and would instead by buried in “secret.”

A spokesperson for the ministry said at the time the decision was made in order to stem protests that frequently accompany the funerals of Palestinians killed by Israeli forces.

However, Israel’s withholding of bodies has only further stoked tensions in the occupied Palestinian territory, and Israeli authorities have since returned many of them of them to their families, on what they refer to as a “case-by-case” basis.

In January, PLO Secretary-General Saeb Erekat called on the Middle East Quartet to pressure Israel to return the bodies of alleged Palestinian attackers still being held by the Israeli authorities.

He said that withholding the bodies of Palestinians was a form of “collective punishment” by Israel against the Palestinian people, which he described as illegal under international law.

Resistance Retrieves Bodies of Its Martyrs in Aleppo Southern Countryside

Local Editor

The Islamic resistance managed on Monday to retrieve the bodies of its martyrs in the town of Tal Hamam (Pigeon hill) in the south eastern countryside of Aleppo.

Alaa of BosniaAmong the bodies was that of Martyr Leader Ali Fayyad (Haj Alaa), aka Alaa of Bosnia.

The operation, which began Sunday overnight, was led by special forces of the Islamic resistance and the Syrian army.

Martyr Ali Fayyad was martyred last week in the ongoing clashes with Syrian terrorists on the Athrayya-Khanasser road in rural Aleppo, according to reports.

He’s one of the first cohorts of the resistance. He participated in a number of qualitative operations, and was sent to Bosnia in the nineties of the last century, to organize the ranks of the Bosnian Serb fighters in the face of Serb attack.

Fayyad then returned to Lebanon and participated in the most prominent operations prior to the liberation of the South from the Israeli occupation.

And with the resistance taking part in the Syrian war, he received numerous responsibilities, notably in the eastern Ghouta, Daraa, Lattakia and Aleppo, and was wounded in the past five years seven times, media reports said.

Source: Al-Manar Website

29-02-2016 – 12:23 Last updated 29-02-2016 – 12:23

Related Articles

How Will Russia Respond to Saudi Anti-Aircraft Missiles in Syria?

Syrian Free Press


With the Syrian Army advancing across the front, Saudi Arabia has announced its willingness to escalate the conflict by supplying portable surface-to-air missiles to terrorists fighting against Syrian forces and, presumably, the Russian forces assisting them. But is it a genuine threat, or just part of Riyadh’s campaign of information warfare?

On Friday, in an interview for Germany’s Spiegel Magazine, Saudi Arabian Foreign Minister Adel al-Jubeir announced that Riyadh is prepared to send portable surface-to-air missile systems to Syria to help ‘moderate rebels’ turn the tide against government forces, which have been making significant breakthroughs in fighting across the country in recent weeks.

“We believe that introducing surface-to-air missiles in Syria is going to change the balance of power on the ground, al-Jubeir explained. “It will allow the moderate opposition to be able to neutralize the helicopters and aircraft that are dropping chemicals and have been carpet-bombing them, just like surface-to-air missiles in Afghanistan were able to change the balance of power there.”


Exactly what ‘moderate opposition’ Mr. al-Jubeir is talking about remains unclear, given that even much of the Western media has admitted that Riyadh, alarmingly, is funding, arming and otherwise supporting Islamist militants.

For the record, the militants that Saudi Arabia supports include al-Fatah, an Idlib-based coalition of Islamist groups including al-Nusra Front, Ahrar ash-Sham and Jund al-Aqsa, all three of which are affiliated with al-Qaeda. Elsewhere across the country, Riyadh has provided assistance to other al-Nusra Front and Ahrar ash-Sham-affiliated groups, and to the Free Syrian Army, an organization which has been whittled down into a small group that actively cooperates with Islamist militants, and which the Pentagon itself has previously estimated consists of “more than 50%…extreme Islamist groups.”

Perhaps it is for this reason that another German outlet, Deutsche Wirtschafts Nachrichten, called al-Jubeir’s remarks about supporting the “moderate opposition” a euphemism.

Having clarified who would be receiving the Saudi supplied anti-aircraft weapons (i.e. terrorists, most of them recognized as such by the State Department), the question which follows is: will they be sent at all? The fact is that Riyadh makes threats to escalate the conflict in Syria on a consistent basis, most recently with its saber-rattling claims about making preparations to invade the country, an idea which many security analysts have brushed off.

Even the threat to send anti-aircraft missile systems to Syria is not an original idea, with Riyadh making the same threat at least twice before, in February 2014, and October 2015.

Moreover, even if the latest once-a-year attempt to intimidate Damascus is not just a bluff this time, the situation on the ground in Syria makes it unclear just how the rebels are going to get the weapons, given that the Syrian Army, supported by Kurdish forces in the north, is rapidly moving to restore control over both the north and south of the country, liberating major population centers and moving to close off the once-porous borders with Turkey and Jordan, through which terrorist fighters, funds, and weapons once freely flowed.







Both in Syria and Lebanon, the thousands of Scud Bs, Cs, and, especially, Ds, are stored underground to prevent detection and, ergo, preventive strikes – almost always by the Zionist Obscenity.  If Hizbollah has over 100,000 missiles in Lebanon, aimed at Occupied Palestine, imagine what the Syria Army has.  After all, it is the Syrian Military Industrial Network which provides HZB with 80% of its missiles – and their guidance systems.  Iran provides the other 20%.

In caves and professionally-dug subterranean storage facilities, these strategic weapon, fully mechanized on their platforms,  are ready to be launched at anyone who invades Syria with a conventional army.  Here are more facts for your consideration:

As we have written, there is no real Saudi Army south of the Iraqi border and southeast of the Jordanian frontier.  There were maneuvers consisting of battalion-strength units made up of mostly retired Egyptian, Moroccan, Sudanese and Pakistani soldiers who were being paid a handsome sum for their participation.  But, as we showed our readers in a translated document forwarded to Prince Muhammad bin Naayif, the heir apparent and Minister of the Interior, by members of Saudi Arabia’s highest echelon officers, the maneuvers were a disaster and the officers openly warned of serious consequences to the kingdom if the government went ahead with its plan to invade Syria.  It is worthy of note that the heir apparent is locked in a battle for survival with the king’s imbecile son, Muhammad bin Salmaan.

“Prince Muhammad bin Salmaan, Saudi Defense Minister and congenital idiot, flashes for the public to the obvious approbation of American dunderhead and Secretary of Defense,  Ashton Carter.

We can go even beyond that.  According to our sources in Damascus, the entire plan to invade Syria is viewed as some kind of running gag.  The logic goes like this:  If the Saudis had such an army capable of fighting a resourceful and experienced army like that of Syria’s, why is Saudi Arabia enmeshed in a catastrophic and endless war in Yemen, the Arab World’s most impecunious nation?  Russian “Sat-Int” also has provided deep insight into the ill-fated Saudi plan to assault Syria’s underbelly.  The Russian position is that the Saudi mercenary army cannot move 5 kilometers into Iraq without being exterminated by Syria’s yet-to-be-deployed SCUDs.  This is not even to mention the use of newly refurbished fighter-bombers under the umbrella of Russian MiG 31B Foxhounds and the Sukhoi-35S, both air supremacy aircraft.  The Saudis have been told by the U.S. not to engage the Yemenis.  They must have also been told not to lock horns with the much more powerful Syrian Army and its allies, Iran and Russia.

Taking a lesson from the effects of a worldwide decline in oil prices; their own imminent bankruptcy; their genetically programmed ineptitude, the Saudis have embarked on a lightning campaign to convince the world of the righteousness of their cause.  A few days ago, the much-maligned, much-sexually-abused foreign minister and “ghulaam”, ‘Aadil Al-Jubayr, flew to the Zionist Abomination to meet with members of the military command, MOSSAD and even, the slimy, unctuous and corpulent Lithuanian rodent, Benjamin Mileikowski (a/k/a “Netanyahu”) to coordinate plans to invade Syria.  This visit comes after a Zionist delegation traveled to Riyaadh to discuss strategy with the apes of that country.  We don’t know what the Zionists have told the meat-headed Saudi barbarians, but, it must have involved either diplomatic finesse or a demand for more money than the Saudis could borrow.  Note also that King Salmaan intends to visit Vladimir Putin in the next few days to discuss how the Russians are going to annihilate the army of clowns he plans to send into Syria.

The Zionist Settler State has much to consider.  For starters, HZB  has the ability to strike deep into Occupied Palestine hitting congested industrial areas.  The Zionist missile defense system, the Iron Dome, is not capable of tracking scores of missiles fired at the same time.  This is the essence of both the SAA’s and HZB’s strategy, to wit:  overwhelm the Zionist air defense system with more objects than the enemy radar can track.  Notice how Hamas, firing volleys of its Qassam missiles, as prehistoric as they are inaccurate, into southern Palestine manage to always reach Zionist territory although some rockets are sacrificed as distractions for the Iron Dome system.  Studies of the Zionist air defense constellation have not been particularly encouraging and the average settler will have to plan many weeks underground as Syrian-made SCUDs and FROGs descend upon their counterfeit state like an unending maelstrom of metal and fire. And as they sit and wait for the bombings to stop, they will have to consider the over 50,000 commandos who are going to simultaneously penetrate Zionist borders to finish up what the missiles couldn’t.

Prince Muhammad bin Naayif, the Heir Apparent and Minister of the Interior, is practically under house arrest by orders of Muhammad bin Salmaan.  His “Ministry of the Interior” has been redefined to include the courtyard to his home.  Many Saudi family members are enraged by his marginalization.

Muhammad bin Salmaan, cannot go on with his charade.  His military policies are patently disastrous and reflect the mindset of an individual besotted by alcohol, advanced syphilis and amphetamines – not to mention hysteria and vainglory.  He has been told that there has to be a “coalition” to support the non-existent Saudi military force.  But, this coalition can’t be some rickety Rube Goldberg machine whose moving parts are Somali imbeciles, Pakistani mendicants or Egyptian orchard guards – no! – this coalition has to involve a real army capable of facing the full wrath of Iran, HZB, Syria and Russia.  This is no walk in the park.  It is the end of the Saudi regime.

Dr. Assad has given the order to prepare for a “devastating counterattack against Saudi Arabia using all capabilities”.  This means that Syria will begin utilizing its vast arsenal of ground-to-ground missiles.  That is the “surprise” the Arab media is talking about although they don’t know specifically what the surprise really is.  There are massive underground warehouses, each the size of 5 airplane hangars with thick metal gates opening up on to the Damascus Plain where the warheads of the missiles have Palestinian cities painted on them.  This time, if the Zionists and Saudis make this lethal mistake, missiles named Haifa, Jaffa, Jerusalem, Al-Khaleel, Nubulus, Jineen, Tool-Karm and Gaza will fall from the sky with a type of explosive the Zionist derelicts have never seen.  The Saudis will buckle instantly after the first strike.  The Zionists will have to deal with their failed state as they rancorously bellow out threats of nuclear retaliation.  It is here that Russia will insure no such response as its nuclear submarines are readied to deliver the deterrent which will end the suffering and subjugation of the Palestinian people once and for all.

The Saudis are flummoxed.  They just don’t know what to do about this cease fire.  Their major allies, ISIS and Nusra/Alqaeda, are exempted from the cease fire and are viewed by the Russians and Syrians as fair game.  The Saudis are watching Jaysh Al-Fath, whose capo, Zahraan ‘Alloosh,  was recently rendered into a fine puree, reduced to quivering sheep some of whose eyes are fixated on a possible Amnesty from the government.  The Saudis, clearly unable to understand how they can’t get their way after buying their wish-list for decades from wishy-washy, morally flaccid and whore-like hedonists, are suddenly without friends – the United States having opted for the war against ISIS and avoidance of a new world war whose endgame would be an apocalypse.

Their only allies are Turkey, a nation teetering on the brink of a new internal cataclysm brought on by policies calculated to enrich a few Islamist plutocrats; and the Zionist Ghetto State, whose primary axiom of survival can be summed up with the all-American expression:  “I don’t stick my neck out for nobody”.   With little money to go around these days, the Saudis, whose brains are addled by exposure to constant air conditioning, can find no instrument to effectuate their self-destructive political/military strategy – if there was one to begin with.

No, my friends, there is no huge army on the Iraqi border (my sources say it is about 24,000 total) and there are only 4 Saudi jets flown into Incirlik.  The Yemeni freedom fighters are on the verge of establishing total control over Ma`rib Province with Saudi-backed troops reeling from incessant defeat.  The Saudis have resorted now to a “scorched earth” policy in a country, like Yemen, which was already scorched by years of mismanagement and a population addicted to Qaat.  And, yet, they can’t secure one single victory as evidenced by the silence in the Western media over the entire fiasco.  In the meantime, the Russian Army continues to mass on Armenia’s border with Turkey.  ZAF



Ibrahim Abdul-Rashid sends this eye-opener about the Saudis and their miscalculations:

Read more

Related Articles

Truce, what truce? israel doesn’t understand the meaning of the word

Israeli Military Targets Gaza Civilians, Violates Truce

Sunday February 28, 2016 – 15:39
Israeli military boats and border forces early Sunday morning opened machine gunfire on Palestinian fishermen and farmers offshore of the northern Gaza Strip and to the south of the Strip, respectively, according to WAFA correspondence. Full Story

Army Kidnaps Eight Palestinians In The West Bank

Monday February 29, 2016 – 10:18
Israeli soldiers have kidnapped, on Monday at dawn, at least eight Palestinians, in different parts of the West Bank, and took them to a number of interrogation facilities and military bases. The army also demolished residential structures east of Tubas. Full Story

Soldiers Attack And Detain A Child Near Ramallah

Monday February 29, 2016 – 09:50
Israeli soldiers invaded, on Sunday evening, the town of Silwad, east of the central West Bank city of Ramallah, detained a child for several hours and repeatedly struck and beat him, causing various injuries. Full Story

Soldiers Attack And Kidnap A Palestinian Teen After Shooting Him In Jerusalem

Monday February 29, 2016 – 08:29
Israeli soldiers shot, on Sunday, a Palestinian teen in the al-‘Eesawiyya town, in occupied Jerusalem, and kidnapped him. The army also kidnapped another Palestinian and invaded several neighborhoods leading to clashes. Full Story

Soldiers Kidnap A Palestinian In Hebron, Injure Another In Gaza

Monday February 29, 2016 – 08:00
Israeli soldiers have kidnapped, on Sunday evening, a Palestinian teen from Beit Ummar town, north of the southern West Bank district of Hebron. The soldiers also shot and injured a Palestinian

Israeli troops invade village near Bethlehem, critically wounding two Palestinians

Sunday February 28, 2016 – 23:13
On Sunday, Israeli forces invaded the village of al-Khader, south of Bethlehem, and began firing live ammunition randomly throughout the village, according to local sources. Two Palestinians were critically wounded: a middle-aged dentist and a 16-year old boy. Full Story

Settlers Raid Salfit Village, Escorted by Army

Sunday February 28, 2016 – 15:28
A group of Israeli settlers, escorted by Israeli military forces, raided the village of Yasuf, in the northern West Bank district of Salfit ,on Saturday. Full Story

US to Increase Israeli Military Support

Sunday February 28, 2016 – 14:55
US officials have agreed to an Israeli request to increase annual military aid, according to Israeli public radio. Full Story
%d bloggers like this: