I’m Not Racist, am I?

December 10, 2017  /  Gilad Atzmon

By Gilad Atzmon

I’m Not Racist: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=43gm3CJePn0

The above video is rapper’s Joyner Lucas’ “I’m Not Racist.” It’s uncomfortable for some of us to watch, but within a few days it was viewed by  12 million people.

The video opens with a big white man in a “Make America Great Again” hat ‘speaking his mind,’ by expressing what many white Americans believe about blacks.  In the second verse, the song takes a surprising turn — a young black man in dreadlocks tells his story and counters each of the white man’s identitarian generalizations.

Why has I’m Not Racist  attracted millions of viewers? Because unlike Western academia, media, politicians and progressives who try to suppress the way people think and express themselves, the artist here attempts to reshape the universe, offering a prospect of unity.

While oligarchs and their identitarian lapdogs push us into race wars, religious conflicts, immoral interventionist disasters  and identity battles, beauty focuses on the universal. Art shows us how to escape from the dystopia inflicted by the Soroses and their cultural and political mercenaries.

In I’m Not Racist’s  final scene we see forgiveness. The white and the black men reconcile. The big Trump supporter and the young black man embrace.  Human bonds prevail. Let us try extend this exercise a bit. Can we imagine an Israeli and a Palestinian telling each other what they really think about each other? I think we can. Can we think of a Jihadi Muslim playing a similar role with a  global war enthusiast? I think we can.

But what about a Goy and a Jew? Can we envisage a video of a Goy shouting angrily at a Jew what many Goyim think about Israel, choseness, the Fed, Goldman Sachs, Soros, Hollywood, the Holocaust industry, the Holodomor, Palestine, AIPAC, CFI, the Lobby, Weinstein, Epstein, Lord Janner?  Would a video with such content survive for one day on youtube? Can we also imagine an angry Jew standing in front of a camera sharing the Jewish side of the story? Will he proffer the Jewish view of the world and in particular, the Goyim?  Will he tell us the meanings of  Goyishe Kopfshiksa and Shvartze ? I suspect that we all know the answer to this. It is not going to happen for the same reason it has never happened.

Those who self identify (politically) as Jews are often removed from the realm of the universal.  When they ‘oppose racism,’ they are too often primarily concerned with antisemitsm. Even when they support the Palestinians, they do so within racially exclusive Jewish political cells as JVPs can attest. When they fight for ‘freedom of Speech on Israel’ within the Labour Party they still operate as the ‘Jewish’ Voice for Labour and form an ‘all-Jewish panel.’

freedom of speech on on PLS.png

It is a reasonable argument that the Jew/Goy relationship is volatile territory, guarded and even policed by a variety of means including legal measures.

Rapper Joyner Lucas crosses the black/white divide because for him being in the world is being amongst others.  To achieve the same goal, Jews must find a way to rid themselves of all traces of choseness and exceptionalism. And here is the Jewish dilemma once again – when Jews do that, when they drift away from choseness, they become ordinary boring humans, they stop being Jews they become Goyim. Some Jews in the past have chosen this path – they have successfully blended into the universal.

Advertisements

الموت البطيء… حُكم آل خليفة على الشيخ عيسى قاسم

الموت البطيء… حُكم آل خليفة على الشيخ عيسى قاسم

نور مريم الزين

موتاً بطيئاً، هكذا قرّر آل خليفة، حُكّام النظام البحريني، طريقة النيل من أبرز خصومهم السياسيين، الشيخ عيسى قاسم، الذي هو أهم المرجعيات الدينية في البلاد. رصاصةٌ واحدة كانت كفيلةً بوضع حدّ لأشدّ خصوم النظام يوم اقتحمت القوات الأمنية منزل قاسم في الدراز (شمالي غربي البلاد)، في أيّار الماضي، حينما أجبرته على الإقامة الجبرية فيه. وأدى الهجوم آنذاك إلى سقوط خمسة شهداء وعشرات الجرحى من المعتصمين أمام منزله، حيث تحوّل إلى «ساحةٍ للفداء»، كما سمّاها البحرينيون.

ويُقال آنذاك إن الملك «طأطأ سلاحه عن وجه قاسم حتى لا يناله عار قتل أكبر مرجعية دينية لشيعة البحرين»، وأيضاً في محاولة منه لحفظ ما تبقّى من «ماء وجهه» أمام المجتمع الدولي.

يقبع قاسم في منزله المحاصر بنصف وزنه بعدما سحبت جنسيّته، رافضاً المغادرة الفورية من الوطن الذي لبثت فيه عائلته عقوداً، مع اتهام آل خليفة لهم بأنهم «عجمٌ وليسوا عرباً»، إذ تحت قوّة السلاح، خضع الرجل الثمانيني للإقامة الجبرية، لكنّه ظلّ صامداً حتى أنهكه المرض.

الطبيب الذي زار قاسم، أوّل من أمس، تحت حراسة مشددة من وزارة الداخلية، أكّد أن «أبو سامي» يعاني فتقاً خطيراً تسبّب في نزيفٍ داخلي في جسده النحيل. فـ«الأدوية لم تعد فعّالة، لكن مجموعة عمليات جراحية، وبإشراف طاقمٍ طبي مختص، كفيلةٌ بشفاء الشيخ»، وفق الطبيب.

وبعد تشخيص إصابة قاسم بنزيف غير قابل للعلاج في المنزل، ما زال الرجل طريح الفراش، ولم تحرّك السلطات ساكناً حتى الساعة. مرّ يومان ولم تظهر سيارة إسعافٍ لتقلّه إلى المشفى، ولم تنبس «الداخلية» ببنت شفّة، فأي تصريحٍ علني برفضها تأمين العلاج سوف يثبت إخضاع «الشيخ» للإقامة الجبرية، وهو ما لم تعلنه الحكومة يوماً، لكنها تنفذه منذ ستة أشهر.

وفق معلومات «الأخبار»، لم يوافق قاسم، في بادئ الأمر، على أن يأتي أحد بطبيبٍ حتى لا يتعرض الأخير لخطر التحقيقات والاعتقال بسببه، كما رفض أي معالجةٍ تأتي من جهةٍ غير موثوقة، ولا سيّما أن التخلص منه يأتي في صلب اهتمامات الحكومة وحلفائها في الخليج.

في هذا السياق، أكّد النائب السابق عن «كتلة الوفاق»، علي الأسود، أن «هناك مشروعاً لتصفية الشيخ»، مشيراً إلى وجود «تدويلٍ لقضية الشيخ عيسى قاسم، إذ تستخدم الحكومة هذا الملف كورقةٍ أخيرة للمناكفة السياسية في الصراع السعودي ــ الإيراني». وأضاف في حديث إلى «الأخبار» أن «حرمان الأب الشيخ عيسى قاسم العلاج هو لعب بالنار بالنسبة إلى آل خليفة».

علماء البحرين أكّدوا بدورهم حراجة الوضع الصحي للزعيم الديني، ووجّهوا في بيان دعوة إلى «الشعب من أجل النزول في الشارع رجالاً وشباباً ونساءً وأطفالاً، وإعداد النصرة، عبر الخروج في المسيرات السلميّة في جميع المناطق، في ليلة الجمعة القادمة… في هبّة جماهيرية غيورة على سلامة الوطن، وسلامة فقيهه وقائده»، واحتجاجاً أيضاً على «تصاعد حملات القمع والمداهمات والاعتقالات، ورفضاً للزجّ بالوطن وقضاياه في النزاعات والتصفيات الإقليمية».

وحذّر البيان من أن «الوطن ما عاد يحتمل أكثر، والانفجار وشيكٌ إنْ لمْ يُتدارك… المسؤولية الشرعية والوطنية تحتّم على الجميع التحرّك قبل وقوع الكارثة وحدوث ما لا تحمد عقباه».

هذا المشهد يوضح أن النظام لا يدرس أبعاد الأزمة السياسية التي وصلت حدّ الانفجار مع تهديد الحكومة بوضوح لصحة قاسم وحياته، الأمر الذي يراه معظم البحرينيين تعرّضاً مباشراً لهم، ومسّاً بأكبر رموزهم.

Related Articles

B is for Book Burners

November 23, 2017  /  Gilad Atzmon

book burners.jpg

The New York Daily News reports that Leaders of a prominent West Side synagogue are threatening to cancel a book fair next month unless a nearby store ditches a pro-Palestine children’s book.

P is for Palestine” teaches children the alphabet using Palestinian references. But Rabbi Ammiel Hirsch  (photo above) of the Stephen Wise Free Synagogue said it also glorifies violence.

“The book states that ‘I is for Intifada,’ Arabic for rising up for what is right, if you are a kid or grownup!” Rabbi Hirsch said in an open letter posted on the temple’s website. “The intifada was not ‘a rising up for what is right.’ It was a mass descent into immorality.”

It would be helpful if the Rabbi explains to us how a popular uprise against a brutal racist occupier is ‘immoral.’  I would also like to learn from the rabbi whether book burning is a reform Jewish value, it has clearly become a popular exercise.

The book “P is for Palestine” is on sale at the Book Culture bookstore on Columbus Ave. on the Upper West Side.

Or buy online here 

Rare Opposition To Zionist Terror within The British Jewish Community

November 19, 2017  /  Gilad Atzmon

jcrethink.jpg

GA: The ultra Zionist Jewish Chronicle allowed a single voice of reason into its letters page this weekend.

https://www.thejc.com/comment/letters/letters-17th-november-1.448327

Misjudgment

In a rather belated response to Rosa Doherty’s article of October 24, concerning a public appearance of Gilad Atzmon, I would like to take issue with certain comments reported therein.

Rabbi Zvi Solomons is quoted as calling Mr  Atzmon “a notorious antisemite”, and says that “he has promoted Holocaust denial, compared Israelis to the Nazis” and  Jonathan Arkush, President of the Board of Deputies, holds that no “reputable event should feature Gilad Atzmon”, opinions I respectfully but vigorously disagree with.

Firstly, is  Mr. Atzmon truly an antisemite? An antisemite as defined by who, and by what criteria? Should we not apply ourselves to these questions before we  brand anyone with such a grave charge, however objectionable (nay, offensive!) their opinions be? As far as I know, and I may be wrong, Mr Atzmon has never denied that the  Holocaust happened but rather has opposed laws which seek to prohibit its denial; and did Mr Atzmon really compare all Israelis to Nazis, or is his clumsy and admittedly provocative critique of Israeli policies being taken as proof of something much more sinister?

Even were Mr Atzmon to confess himself as a most virulent antisemite, both tactically and on principle, the last thing we should do is seek to ban him from “reputable” public events; rather, we should  welcome any  and every opportunity to debate him and people with similar ideas, with facts and well-reasoned arguments that will show any fair-minded, rational person how ill-founded Mr Atzmon’s discourse is.

And before anyone accuses me of being naive and unrealistic in adopting this response, I would counter that to silence or “shut him down” truly plays into genuine antisemites’ hands (eg: ”Look, the Zionists are trying to shut up honest dissenters again”) and leaves a  part of the intellectual field to them.

Robert Coleman
London W17

The Zionist Hate Campaign Against David Icke

November 18, 2017  /  Gilad Atzmon

Campaign Against Antisemitism was desperate to cancel David Icke’s talk in Manchester last night.  Labour MP, Kate Green, worked hard on behalf of the Lobby. They all failed,  Icke’s talk, so i hear, was a great success. I looked into the ‘evidence’ levelled against Icke by the Zionist hate groups. There is nothing there as I prove in the following video..

https://youtu.be/HLKCrVrT88w

cover bit small.jpg

 If they want to burn it, you want to read it!

Being in Time – A Post Political Manifesto, Amazon.co.uk , Amazon.com and  here (gilad.co.uk).

MBS Bribes Trump: $1bn in Return For Supporting Arrests

Local Editor

07-11-2017 | 08:05

Saudi Arabia’s Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman personally bribed Donald Trump with $1bn during the US president’s visit to Riyadh in May, according to a well-informed but anonymous Saudi commentator, who uses the Twitter handle Mujtahidd.

 

Twitter


Bin Salman, then-deputy crown prince, was able to win the US administration’s favour in his power struggle with his cousin Mohammed bin Nayef, who was heir to the throne until he was deposed in June.

Mujtahidd revealed on Monday that Trump’s visit to Saudi Arabia changed Washington’s stance on the competition between bin Salman and bin Nayef, forcing the US to take the 32-year-old’s side.

Previous US administrations, he said, had been cautious to maintain harmony within the Gulf Cooperation Council [GCC], a vital region for US interests.

Besides courting Trump to take his side in internal Saudi affairs, bin Salman also secured a direct line of communication to the US president. Trump has bashed Doha and encouraged the Saudi-led blockade against Qatar in statements that contradicted his own Military and State departments, which had called for ending the Gulf dispute.

During Trump’s visit to Saudi in May, a mysterious boat linked to the Trump organization arrived to the port of Jeddah, and it was filled with $1bn in cash, a personal gift from bin Salman, Mujtahidd reported.

On Monday, Trump endorsed bin Salman’s purge of members the royal family in the name of fighting corruption. Security forces arrested 11 princes along with 38 top businessmen and former ministers on Saturday, including global investor Prince Alwaleed bin Talal, who has significant assets in NewsCorp, Citigroup, 21st Century Fox and Twitter.

Bin Salman’s critics have condemned the arrests as a push by the crown prince to consolidate power.

Trump accused those detained in Saudi Arabia on Saturday of “milking” the kingdom for years.

If confirmed, bin Salman’s bribe to Trump would have massive legal and political consequences.

Source: MEE, Edited by website team

 

The BBC Exposed

The BBC Exposed

For much of its 80 year existence, the BBC has been criticized by those who believe it to be an insidious mixture of political and cultural power, and now in the wake of the Jimmy Savile scandal, the British public is once again outraged at their national broadcaster. Join us today on The Corbett Report as we examine the history, function, and institutional biases of the BBC, and how the British people are rising up against the Big Brother Corporation.

%d bloggers like this: