Hezbollah Attack on Israel’s Ammonia Results in 5-Nuclear-Bomb Deaths, Destruction: Yediot Ahronot

January 31, 2017

Hezbollah versus Zionist Ammonia

Five nuclear bombs would explode and claim hundreds of thousands of Zionist settlers if the Ammonia ship which moves the chemical substance to Haifa bay once per month, Yediot Ahronot reported.

The Zionist paper added that the ship moves 16700 tons of liquid Ammonia, which have the destructive capacity of five nuclear bombs.

Hezbollah Secretary General Sayyed Hasan Nasrallah threatened in 2016 to strike the Ammonia tanks in Haifa, stressing that this would have the same effect of launching a nuclear bomb:

Yediot Ahronot considered that Hezbollah Secretary General Sayyed Hasan Nasrallah’s threat to strike the Ammonia tanks in Haifa and cause the vast damages is realistic.

In details, when any of the Ammonia tanks on the ship’s deck is targeted, all the marine animals within tens of kilometers would be killed due to the gas leakage, according to the report.

The report noted that half of the gases would melt and raise the temperature of the remaining amounts to the boiling point, forming an Ammonia cloud, which weighs over 8000 tons and covers Haifa city for 8 hours, stifling all (hundreds of thousands) the existing settlers to death.

In this regard, Haaretz Israeli newspaper reported that the Zionist officers are concerned about Hezbollah sophisticated capabilities to launch pinpoint rockets and accurately hit the targets, including the Ammonia tanks.

Source: Al-Manar Website

Related Video

Related Articles

Advertisements

Paul Craig Roberts: ‘The Left is Self-Destructing’

Posted on January 30, 2017

[ Ed. note – The above video shows protestors at JFK Airport protesting Trump’s ban on travelers from certain countries. But of course one wonders: why weren’t these people out protesting when Obama was in the White House spending his days bombing Libya, supporting terrorists in Syria, carrying out drone strikes in Pakistan, or waging what seems to be an endless war in Afghanistan? What is worse, refusing to allow refugees from war-torn countries into the US–or starting the wars which turn them into refugees in the first place? This is the point Paul Craig Roberts makes, and it’s a rather good one.

Another good point, and one which Roberts fails to make, is why wasn’t Saudi Arabia included in Trump’s ban? But then Roberts seems to be rather reserved when it comes to voicing criticisms of the new president, or at least so far he’s been. But consider the list of countries to which the travel bans apply: Iraq, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria, and Yemen. Conspicuously absent is Saudi Arabia. If you’re going to have such a list to begin with, would it not make sense to include the very country that is the epicenter of the takfiri religious ideology–an ideology which declares people of all other faiths, including other Muslims, as infidels–and which has been a major source of funding for terrorists in Syria? A country which, by the way, also has invaded Yemen, where it is waging war against the Houthi Ansurallah rebels, who, as in the case of Assad in Syria, have been one of the principle forces opposing Al-Qaeda-linked terrorists in their region?

So what to make of all this? Well, perhaps it’s simply another case of “Trump the chameleon.” On the other hand, readers might be interested in an article published a few days ago by the Jerusalem Post under the headline “Meet the Top Jewish Officials in the Trump Administration.” The article names eleven in all. You can read about it here. One thing is for certain, though, as Roberts correctly points out: there is a great deal of “mindlessness” in the left today. ]

The Left is Self-Destructing

Paul Craig Roberts

The mindlessness is unbearable. Amnesty International tells us that we must “fight the Muslim ban” because Trump’s bigotry is wrecking lives. Anthony Dimaggio at CounterPunch says Trump should be impeached because his Islamophobia is a threat to the Constitution. This is not to single out these two as the mindlessness is everywhere among those whose worldview is defined by Identity Politics.

One might think that Amnesty International should be fighting against the Bush/Cheney/Obama regime wars that have produced the refugees by killing and displacing millions of Muslims. For example, the ongoing war that Obama inflicted on Yemen results in the death of one Yemeni child every 10 minutes, according to UNICEF. Where is Amnesty International?

Clearly America’s wars on Muslims wreck far more lives than Trump’s ban on immigrants. Why the focus on an immigration ban and not on wars that produce refugees? Is it because Obama is responsible for war and Trump for the ban? Is the liberal/progressive/left projecting Obama’s monstrous crimes onto Trump? Is it that we must hate Trump and not Obama?

Immigration is not a right protected by the US Constitution. Where was Dimaggio when in the name of “the war on terror” the Bush/Obama regime destroyed the civil liberties guaranteed by the US Constitution? If Dimaggio is an American citizen, he should try immigrating to the UK, Germany, or France and see how far he gets.

The easiest and surest way for the Trump administration to stop the refugee problem, not only for the US but also for Europe and the West in general, is to stop the wars against Muslim countries that his predecessors started. The enormous sums of money squandered on gratuitous wars could instead be given to the countries that the US and NATO have destroyed. The simplest way to end the refugee problem is to stop producing refugees. This should be the focus of Trump, Amnesty, and Dimaggio.

Is everyone too busy hating to do anything sensible?

It is very disturbing that the liberal/progressive/left prefers to oppose Trump than to oppose war. Indeed, they want a war on Trump. How does this differ from the Bush/Obama war on Muslims?

The liberal/progressive/left is demonstrating a mindless hatred of the American people and the President that the people chose. This mindless hatred can achieve nothing but the discrediting of an alternative voice and the opening of the future to the least attractive elements of the right-wing.

The liberal/progressive/left will end up discrediting all critics, thereby empowering those to whom the liberal/progressive/left are most opposed.

Trump’s Immigration Ban Doesn’t Include Country of 9/11 Hijackers!

31-01-2017 | 11:20

Trump’s Immigration Ban Doesn’t Include Country of 9/11 Hijackers!

Trump’s Immigration Ban Doesn’t Include Country of 9/11 Hijackers!

Pamela Engel

President Donald Trump’s executive order barring immigrants from seven majority-Muslim countries from entering the US doesn’t include Saudi Arabia, the country where most of the 9/11 attackers came from.

In fact, the executive order doesn’t apply to any of the countries where the 9/11 attackers were from. Egypt, the United Arab Emirates, and Lebanon were also left off the list.

The executive order temporarily bars citizens from Iran, Iraq, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria, and Yemen from traveling to the US. Trump adviser Kellyanne Conway said over the weekend that the order was “a ban on prospective travel from countries … that have a recent history of training and exporting and harboring terrorists.”

Trump also cited the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks on New York City and Washington, DC, directly several times in his executive order.

“The visa-issuance process plays a crucial role in detecting individuals with terrorist ties and stopping them from entering the United States,” the order said.” Perhaps in no instance was that more apparent than the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, when State Department policy prevented consular officers from properly scrutinizing the visa applications of several of the 19 foreign nationals who went on to murder nearly 3,000 Americans.”

Related Video

Fifteen of those 19 foreign nationals were from Saudi Arabia. Osama bin Laden was born in Saudi Arabia, and his family had strong connections to the Saudi royal family. The rest of the attackers were from Egypt, the United Arab Emirates, and Lebanon.

Saudi Arabia in particular, however, has a long history of exporting Wahhabism… that has been blamed for fueling extremism around the world.

Farah Pandith, America’s first special representative to Muslim communities at the State Department, wrote for The New York Times that in each of the 80 countries she visited from 2009 to 2014, “the Wahhabi influence was an insidious presence, changing the local sense of identity; displacing historic, culturally vibrant forms of Islamic practice; and pulling along individuals who were either paid to follow their rules or who became on their own custodians of the Wahhabi world view.”

Pandith continued: “Funding all this was Saudi money, which paid for things like the textbooks, mosques, TV stations and the training of Imams.” She called on countries to “reject free Saudi textbooks and translations that are filled with hate” and “expose the Saudi financing of extremist groups masquerading as cultural exchanges and ‘charity’ organizations.”

Trump called Saudi Arabia the “world’s biggest funder of terrorism” in 2011.

On “Meet the Press” in 2015, Chuck Todd asked Trump why the US should have diplomatic relations with Saudi Arabia if the country funded terrorism.
“The primary reason we are with Saudi Arabia is because we need the oil,” Trump said. “Now, we don’t need the oil so much.”

He continued: “Like it or don’t like it, people have backed Saudi Arabia. What I really mind though is we back it at tremendous expense. We get nothing for it.”

Saudi Arabia has been a major US ally for decades. From 2011 to 2015, Saudi Arabia has been the top destination for US arms exports.

Trump also has a personal financial link to Saudi Arabia, as The Times noted. The Trump Organization registered eight companies in Saudi Arabia in 2015.

White House press secretary Sean Spicer noted over the weekend that the seven countries included in Trump’s executive order were first flagged by the Obama administration as “countries of particular concern” for visa screening.

Source: Business Insider, Edited by website team

 

Related Articles

The Political Scene: Astana Talks

January 31, 2017

Astana Talks

Astana talks have come to a general result that could be described as satisfactory, especially to the Syrian government and its allies and supporters.  The talks ushered in a new era and represented  a very important shift in the Syrian scene.

The main conclusion of the conference proved a salient progress of the government on both military and political levels. Meanwhile, the event was an excellent demonstration of the descending and dwindling capacities of the takfiri military groups, and caused a huge division and fierce fighting among them.

The talks succeeded in achieving its announced goals:
1- the enacting of a total ceasefire.
2- the stoppage of military operations, in preparation for the anticipated international conference towards the end of February to solve the Syrian crisis.

One of the basic remarks in the conference, was the inability of the military  opposition to be represented by a unified and coherent delegation, in contrast to the government delegation which proved high competition and exemplary efficiency.

Moreover, the recent developments represented by the US plans to implement safe zones in Syria would not cause any disturbance to the Syrian strategic plan. The situation has dramatically changed  as  especially after the liberation of Aleppo. As  such, no positive  results would be yielded by the takfiris.

To sum up, the situation in Syria has come to a point where the takfiri groups lost all hope to tip the balance in the foreseeable future, which was translated with more successful reconciliation operations where hundreds of militants handed their arms to the government forces. If the prevailing situation continues,  which is more likely, the chances of a lasting and comprehensive political settlement would be a tangible reality for  the first time in years.

Source: Al-Manar Website

Israeli Company Offers Its Services to Help Build Trump’s Wall

Posted on January 30, 2017

 photo wall_zpsve8wmakk.jpg

Israel-based Magal Security Systems Ltd. seeks this week to persuade officials in Washington to grant it a contract to take part in the construction of the wall the new US administration is planning to build on the American-Mexican borders.

According to Bloomberg News, Magal’s US-based Senstar branch will present its FiberPatrol product at a conference on border security which will be held on Tuesday in Alexandria, Virginia.

Continued here

Trump’s Policies Ruining America’s Image

Trump's policies

Related

اقطعوا يد أردوغان شمالاً وخلّي العيون صاحية جنوباً

محمد صادق الحسيني

يناير 10, 2017

لأنّ انتصارنا في حلب من الوزن الثقيل، ولأنّ هزيمة أميركا وأذنابها أمامنا خلّفت إحباطات كبيرة في صفوف معسكر العدو…

ولأنّ انتصار حلب شتّت شملهم وأطاح بأحلامهم وجعلنا نُهلك ملوكاً ونستخلف آخرين…!

ولأنّ أميركا المتجرّعة كأس السمّ على بوابات حواضرنا قرّرت الهجرة باتجاه البحر الأصفر لمواجهة التنين الصيني…

لذلك فإنّ أردوغان وسلمان وعبدالله ونتن ياهو باتوا أيتاماً وقرّروا تشكيل اتحاد ثكالى المقهور…

فإنّ الأنظار ستتجه بقوة الى تفعيل غرفة الموك من جديد، مع سعي دؤوب لإطلاق يد حرامي حلب ليعبث في الشمال السوري من دون حسيب أو رقيب الى حين ترتيب واشنطن أوراقها الدولية خلال الشهور الستة المقبلة…

وعليه نسجل ما يلي:

نؤكد على دقة معلومات غرفة عمليات حلفاء سورية في ما يتعلق باستعدادات الجماعات المسلحة لشن هجوم واسع على طول جبهات الأحياء الغربية لحلب من أقصى الشمال إلى أقصى الجنوب.

كما نؤكد على أنّ كلّ تلك الحشود والاستعدادات تجري تحت إشراف ضباط عمليات أتراك موجودين في مناطق شمال وجنوب غرب حلب وفي إدلب وأريافها كافة…

وإنّ هدف أردوغان من وراء تحركات جيشه كلها، بالإضافة الى تحركات حذاءَي الناتو، داعش وجبهة النصرة، في جبهات حلب هو تحقيق تغيير ميداني كبير لصالح تركيا، وبالتالي لصالح الولايات المتحدة والناتو قبل انطلاق محادثات أستانة.

أما بخصوص ما توقعه من غرفة عمليات الموك الأردنية فنقول:

أولاً: إنّ تصريحات المدعو محمود فريحات، رئيس أركان جيش النظام الأردني الأخيرة، على قناة «بي بي سي» المثيرة للفتنة المذهبية والمتناقضة يجب التوقف عندها في هذه اللحظة التاريخية…!

ثانياً: فهو وإنْ كان قد حذّر من خطر قوات «خالد بن الوليد» وما يحويه مخيما الحدلات والركبان من جهة، لكنه من الجهة الأخرى ركز على «قلق» النظام الأردني من الخطر الإيراني…!

وهي تصريحات:

– تتوافق مع تصريحات وزير خارجية آل سعود، عادل الجبير، حول الموضوع نفسه قبله بأيام…

– إنّ تصريحات مثل هذه صادرة عن المنصب العسكري الأعلى في الأردن، والذي كان قبل توليه هذا المنصب رئيس أركان الجيش الأردني برتبة منصب «قائد لواء الشمال» في جيش النظام الأردني.

يعني أنّ ما صدر عن الرجل من فحيح ما هو إلا إعلان عن أمر العمليات الذي صدر إليه من غرفة عمليات الموك في عمان يعني من المعلم الأميركي .

أيّ أنه سيتبع هذا الإعلان بأوامر عمليات لمرتزقته على الحدود الشمالية للأردن مع سورية، وكذلك لوحدات جيشه هناك بتسعير التحرك في جنوب سورية ضدّ الجيش العربي السوري والقوات الحليفة.

ثالثاً: تجب ملاحظة انّ هذه التصريحات تندرج في إطار التنسيق الدائم والشامل بين الأردن و«إسرائيل» والولايات المتحدة في العمل المشترك ضدّ دول محور المقاومة.

هذا في الإطار العام، أما في تفاصيل أمر العمليات الأميركي الجديد، فإنه يعني ما يلي:

– نقل جهود الإمداد والتسليح والتمويل للجماعات المسلحة الرئيسية في الجنوب السوري الى أجهزة النظام الأردني، بالتعاون مع «إسرائيل».

– تتمّ تغطية كافة الاحتياجات المالية من خلال نظام آل سعود.

– يلتزم النظام الأردني بتوسيع التنسيق مع وحدات القوات الخاصة «الإسرائيلية» التي تقدّم الدعم لعصابات داعش في جبهة/ دير الزور/ السخنة/ تدمر/.

رابعاً: وهنا يجب الانتباه الشديد إلى الجوهر الاستراتيجي للدور الذي أعلن عن إسناده للأردن، من خلال التصريحات المشار إليها أعلاه.

ايّ زيادة دعم العصابات المسلحة في جنوب سورية، عبر شمال الأردن، وزيادة دعم الجماعات نفسها أخواتها في البادية السورية عبر البوابة الاردنية الشرقية في المفرق/ التنف…

خامساً: يكمن الجوهر الاستراتيجي لأمر العمليات المذكور أعلاه في أنه يهدف إلى:

– إعادة تفعيل جبهات الجنوب بشكل يصل الى إعادة تهديد دمشق، كما كان ذلك قبل سنتين. طبعاً حلم إبليس في الجنة .

– استكمال اندفاعة عصابات داعش في جبهة تدمر/ حمص/ بهدف العودة الى القلمون الشرقي أملاً في تهديد خاصرة دمشق الشمالية الغربية. كذلك في هذه الحالة حلم إبليس في الجنة .

سادساً: بناء على كلّ ما تقدّم، فإنّ الحيطة والحذر الشديدين هما ما يجب اتخاذهما في مواجهة هذا المخطط وعلى الرغم من قناعتنا بأن لا مجال إطلاقاً لنجاحهم في تحقيق ذلك، إلا أنّ أحد أهمّ أسباب إفشال هذا المخطط هو الحذر الشديد.

سابعاً: ينبغي الطلب من الصديق الروسي بأن يضغط على صديقيه الإقليميّين، الأردن و«إسرائيل»، بوقف مؤامراتهم الجديدة على سورية وإيران وحزب الله، واعتبار ذلك خطاً أحمر…

كما أنّ على صديقنا الروسي إذا ما كان مهتماً فعلاً بإنجاح محادثات أستانة أن يُسكت الناعق التركي، وإلا فإنّ مصير أستانة مهدّد بالفشل قطعاً…

يكفينا تلاعباً بدماء أهلنا في سورية على يد العقرب التركي…

ولما كنا نحن الذين انتصرنا في حلب، وهو أمر محتوم وقطعي…

وإذا كان لا بدّ من توظيف هذا الانتصار الميداني في السياسة، وهو أمر عقلاني ومطلوب أيضاً، فلا بد للتركي المشغل لقطّاع الطرق المتعدّدي الأسماء أن يغلق حدوده وكذلك فمه…

الأمر لنا، ولن نسمح لأحد بالتمادي على رجال الله…

وإذا ما «عجبو للتركي راح نضطر نقول له»:

خلّي أستانة تلحق بجنيف، لأنّ الحلّ الوحيد الناجح والمنطقي والناجع أصلاً، هو عندما يكون اجتماع السوريين بكلّ أطيافهم في دمشق، وفي دمشق وحدها، والذي لا يعجبه ذلك «يروح يشرب من البحر الميت»…!

بعدنا طيبين قولوا الله.

(Visited 1٬487 times, 19 visits today)
%d bloggers like this: