Ziad Fadel

الجيش يتقدم باتجاه حي القابون ويسيطر على عدة نقاط للمجموعات المسلحة في مزارع القابون

ALEPPO: The army is moving toward Al-Baab after crushing ISIS psychopaths in Taadif who have admitted to abandoning their positions there. As more reinforcements arrive to help in exterminating the Turk-supported derelicts, the latter started shelling our army. Our army fired back destroying 3 armored cars and killing over 20 of the rodents. We are getting assistance now also from the SDF as the Kurds are beginning to realize that their future is better served with Dr. Assad and the Syrian people than trying to surreptitiously establish federalism in Syria. Russia is working hard to avoid a confrontation between the Turk savages and the Syrian Army.



Al-Qaaboon: This is ‘Alloosh-Land, or so it was before our army decided to put an end to that rat’s Reign of Terror in the Ghoutaa. It is northeast of Damascus and forms a natural entryway into Doumaa where Muhammad ‘Alloosh continues to blow hot air while stripping the citizens of their belongings. The Syrian Army attacked in two prongs, the first from the northwest and the second from the northeast. In so doing, many farm areas were deloused. The carcasses of the dead rodents are scattered all over the fields acting as a very nutritious kind of fertilizer. The purpose of the attack was to cut off terrorist rats from those in Doumaa and Harastaa in anticipation of the Endloosung which is coming to a theater near you in the Eastern Ghoutaa. The attack also came after a limited period of time granted to the huddled vermin by the Syrian Army High Command to surrender and accept amnesty. The amnesty window closed at 6:00 a.m. last Sunday. Intercepted communications indicate a certain hopelessness has set in as the weakening defenses promise a major offensive by the SAA very soon.


Dear Readers, in a very short time, SyrPer will be moving back to its original blog format. This is due to the fact that the present platform is expensive. I have been delighted to note that since we started our blogspot with news about the war in Syria, many new sites have emerged. We now have people like Sharmine Narwani, Afraa Dagher, Brandon Turbeville, Waf Halaby, Samer Hussain, Leith Fadel, and so many others contributing to the real story of the Syrian conflict. This does not mean I am going away or retiring from my coverage. The only difference will be that you have to change the address and start reading the blog. I will keep you all informed about the change and when it will take place. Thanks. Ziad



Another miserable resolution based on the old lies was kited by the United States, the U.K. and the feckless French. It called for sanctions against the Syrian government in the way of denying it access to helicopters. Of course, with our army trouncing the murdering, human-liver-eating cannibals everywhere in Syria, this particular resolution was designed to slow all that down. Russia and China, true to their words, put the kibosh on the ridiculous maneuver and were supported by Bolivia. Kazakhstan, Egypt and Ethiopia all abstained.



Watch this fascinating recreation of the last moments of the Russian giant, Alexander Prokhorenko as he defended his position in Palmyra: (From John Esq)

Fascinating new field development to protect Syrian Armor here sent by John Esq.. Note that Canthama comments on the article at the end:

Jeffrey Laubach sent this email to me with a comment on the lying and propaganda in the media:

“I don’t know about you, but I’ve just about had enough of all the lies that are being propagated by both the government and the mainstream media. Recently, the Saudi Foreign Minister again made the ridiculous claim that President Bashar al-Assad was chiefly responsible for the creation of ISIS by letting radical Islamists out of Syrian jails. Strangely enough, what he failed to mention was that many more, even exponentially more, of these radical Islamists were literally trained and released from U.S. military prisons like Camp Bucca in Iraq.

Bakr al-Baghdadi, the leader of ISIS, was himself an inmate at this prison, where he and other leaders were literally allowed to teach the other inmates – many of which were impressionable young men who, at the time, were innocent of any real crimes. They also presided over their own courts where they administered their own twisted version of  law among the inmates. Incredibly, U.S. military authorities later claimed that there was nothing that they could have done about any of it!

Today however, I discovered on very good authority that not only were these ISIS monsters allowed to teach their twisted ideology to the other inmates, but they were also allowed to use radical Islamist texts, including perhaps the bible of al-Qaeda, Sayyid Qutb’s “Milestones!”

The U.S. government and establishment media can make all the claims that they want, the Saudi Foreign Minister can lie all he wants, but it will NEVER change the fact that ISIS was literally built right inside American-controlled prisons in Iraq. That is the truth.”

Read more 

Related Videos

Related Articles

F. the EU! – America first!

February 27, 2017

The power of recording israel’s theft and violence

The power of recording Israeli theft and violence

The Invisible Walls of Occupation

B’Tselem interactive documentary in which Palestinians from many places and occupations talk of the restrictions on their lives. It offers a virtual tour behind the invisible walls of occupation

16 Feb 2017

Today, B’Tselem released a new interactive documentary entitled “The Invisible Walls of Occupation”. Viewers are invited on a virtual tour of the Palestinian village of Burqah, a rural suburb of the city of Ramallah that has become cut off from its urban centre through various restrictions imposed by Israel. The documentary has Burqah residents leading viewers on a virtual tour of their village. The project depicts the story of the village and illustrates various aspects of Palestinians’ daily life under occupation. The project was co-produced by B’Tselem and Canadian digital studio Folklore, and is based on a B’Tselem report by the same name.

The production costs of B’Tselem’s film were paid by BSST – the British Shalom Salaam Trust.

In 2016 Israel demolished 88 homes in East Jerusalem and 274 in the rest of the West Bank, while denying Palestinians any possibility of building legally in these areas.

B’Tselem annual report
February 2017

The occupation has been in place for 49 years. International law defines occupation as a temporary situation, but after nearly fifty years, the reality in the West Bank and Gaza can no longer be considered temporary. It is unreasonable to keep hoping that Israel will end this situation of its own volition. A third and even fourth generation of Palestinians and Israelis have known no other reality. In view of Israel’s policies over the past half century, a change in policy is highly unlikely.

In the paper “Reality check: Almost fifty years of occupation”, published on June 5th, B’Tselem presents a portrait of the current situation in the West Bank (including East Jerusalem) and the Gaza Strip. In 1967, when the occupation first began, whoever lived on those lands shared the same status. Over the years, Israel has partitioned Palestinian land into separate areas, detached from one another: the Gaza Strip, which has been subject to the stranglehold of a nearly decade-long blockade is on the very cusp of a humanitarian disaster; the West Bank has been split up into dozens of segments, some of which have been transferred – in name only – to the Palestinian Authority; and thousands of hectares have been annexed to Israel and declared a part of Jerusalem. Yet, none of this can change the fact that Israel continues to control millions of Palestinians and dictate the course of their lives, while they have no real power to influence their fate.

The facts outlined in this paper are well-known, as is their significance. Equally well-known is the significance of standing idly by: a perpetuation of the current situation. As we near the 50-year mark of the occupation, determined action is needed to clearly demonstrate the termination of local and international cooperation with the occupation.

Major Issues

1. B’Tselem at the United Nations Security Council
In October, we brought our work to the United Nations Security Council in a special discussion about settlements, where we articulated how all Israeli state agencies – the legal system (including the High Court of Justice), the planning authorities, the military and the government – are acting in concert to perpetuate control and advance Israeli interests at the expense of Palestinian rights, while minimizing international consequences. B’Tselem’s message to the world was clear: without international action, the occupation will not come to an end. Two B’Tselem videos were screened during B’Tselem’s presentation: Razed to the Ground (on demolitions in Area C and on the military renewing the segregation on the main street in Hebron.

The Jerusalem Municipality’s demolition campaign carries on in full swing. This morning (Wednesday, 22 Feb. 2017), municipality and security personnel demolished a home in Beit Hanina, East Jerusalem. Seven people, including five minors, were made homeless. Photo by Hussam ‘Abed, B’TselemFacebook page.

To expose this reality is not easy – nor is it simple to weather the consequences of speaking out. From the Prime Minister on down, intimidating human rights advocates has become the new norm. B’Tselem is strong and resilient. Nonetheless, it is a difficult political environment to contend with.

Prime Minister Netanyahu set the tone by inciting against B’Tselem on Facebook and threatening legislation to deny us national service volunteers – an act of political vengeance. A litany of Israeli politicians followed suit. Coalition Chair MK David Bitan said our director “should find himself another citizenship.” These were not the only threats made against Hagai or B’Tselem. There were others and surely there are more to come. As Israeli politicians attack us, we continue reminding them and the world that the occupation – not B’Tselem – is the real problem.

The international community did not stay silent in response to these threats. There was a direct statement by the US State Department in support of B’Tselem, as well as a response from the US representative to the UN who said: “We thank these NGOs – B’Tselem and Americans for Peace Now – for sharing their technical expertise … as we recognize other NGOs around the world who shed light on difficult issues … it is vital that all governments protect and create an atmosphere that all voices can be heard”. There was also a show of support from the EU and from the UN’s special rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the Palestinian territories who said he will examine the treatment of human rights defenders in the region in light of “the severe reaction by the Israeli government” to the appearance of B’Tselem before the UN Security Council.

B’Tselem sent out a press release on the address, which gained massive media attention in Palestinian, International and Israeli media. B’Tselem leveraged the Israeli media’s attention to engage the Israeli public on the issue of the occupation. B’Tselem translated the speech to Hebrew, published several op-eds and held multiple media interviews on Israeli mainstream news programs to explain the motivations behind the speech. Just within Israel: David Zonsheine (Chair of B’Tselem’s board of directors) wrote an op-ed in “Local Talk” and also interviewed in the major radio show on “Reshet Bet” hosted by Razi Barkai, as well as Galatz radio; Orly Noy, member of B’Tselem’s board, interviewed on TV in both New Evening (Israel Channel 1 major news show) as well as Israel Channel 2’s 6pm news show with Oded Ben Ami; Amit Gilutz, B’Tselem Spokesperson, interviewed on TV for the holiday news programs of Israel Channel 1 and 10, interviewed on 103 radio and wrote an op-ed for the JPOST; Hagai El-Ad, B’Tselem Executive Director, wrote a widely circulated op- ed in Haaretz, and in Mako and held multiple interviews on TV Channel 2, Galatz Radio and Reshet Bet. He also published the op-ed “While Bibi was busy slamming me on Facebook” on the Times of Israeli Blog.

The issue was covered by all the major news agencies in Israel, including Ynet, Nana10 and NRG. There were also multiple articles published in support of B’Tselem in Haaretz, to name a few: Professor Ze’ev Shternhal, Haaretz: “B’Tselem is the real patriot”; Vered Li, Haaretz: “Yes, outside pressure works”; Haaretz editorial: “We are all B’Tselem head Hagai El-Ad”; Haaretz editorial: “It was B’Tselem’s duty to go to the UN”.

B’Tselem gained many Israeli supporters following the speech. More than 3,700 people signed B’Tselem’s petition #Im_with_BTselem, and more than 80% of them were Israelis. The Hebrew Facebook page gained a further 1,500 followers and the English page gained more than 1,400. 541 additional people joined B’Tselem’s Twitter.

The Hebrew Facebook Hashtag אני_עם_בצלם# was posted in 179 posts that were seen over 600K times. On Twitter the petition reached 65K views and 168 shares, and received support from important public figures, such as Barak Ravid. There was a huge surge in the number of small donations to B’Tselem from Israelis in October. The number of Israeli donors in October alone equaled more than the number in the whole period of January to September, and almost five times the amount in October 2015. The sums donated were small, but the support expressed by so many Israelis was particularly encouraging.

Following resolution 2334 condemning Israeli settlements adopted by the United Nations Security Council on December 24, B’Tselem sent out a clear message: UNSC Vote: against the occupation, not Israel. B’Tselem director also published an op-ed in New-Zealand’s leading daily newspaper, thanking them for the role they took in pushing the resolution forward. He also published an op-ed in Haaretz titled The UN Security Council Vote Is pro-Israel, in both English and Hebrew.






2. Exposing the Whitewash Mechanism
The Occupation’s Fig Leaf

In May, B’Tselem announced a dramatic decision for the organization: we would no longer file complaints with Israel’s military law enforcement system. After a generation’s work, we concluded that a new strategy was needed to deal with the reality of systemic lack of accountability. By exposing Israel’s law enforcement system as a whitewash mechanism, we are acting to challenge a system working to ensure impunity rather than accountability.

B’Tselem will continue reporting violations, but will no longer help a system which serves as a whitewash mechanism and that also, in advance, absolves senior military and government officials of responsibility for the policy they set out.

B’Tselem’s detailed report, The Occupation’s Fig Leaf: Israel’s Military Law Enforcement System as a Whitewash Mechanism, explains the reasons behind B’Tselem’s decision. It was based on information compiled from hundreds of cases where B’Tselem has filed demands for investigation with the military, dozens of military investigations and numerous meetings with officials.

B’Tselem produced three short films, on the Beating of Sharif Abu Hayah, the Killing of Lubna al-Hanash and the Killing of Mustafa Tamimi, to accompany and follow the publication of Fig leaf. The films were disseminated within Israel and the international community through B’Tselem’s newsletter, website, YouTube channel and social media, and were viewed thousands of times.

A printed insert, including an executive summary of the report and 4 case studies, was sent out with the weekend edition of Haaretz, reaching an estimated 300,000 Israelis directly.

The publication was accompanied by a series of meetings and public events, including: a briefing for diplomats stationed in Israel and the oPt, attended by dozens; a press conference; events for Israeli, Palestinian and international NGOs; and meetings with opinion shapers, political pundits, journalists and Israeli political parties.

B’Tselem’s press release and media work on the report was immensely successful, receiving massive coverage and hundreds of references in print and online. B’Tselem’s decision was discussed on multiple major TV and radio programs in Israel, the oPt and internationally, including many interviews with B’Tselem staff as well as an op-ed by B’Tselem’s chair David Zonsheine and a paper published in Open Society Foundations. In effect, the issue was covered by all the major Israeli and Palestinian newspapers, and dozens of international outlets, to name just a few: Reuters; The Forward; the Telegraph; Aljazeera; NBC; the New York Times; the Washington Post; and RT.

B’Tselem designed and published media ads in Palestinian newspapers (al-Hayat al-Jadida and al-Quds) – illustrating the reasons why B’Tselem decided to stop seeking accountability through the existing Israeli investigative mechanisms, and inviting Palestinian victims to join this move and stop filing complaints to the military system.

The report was also distributed through social media outreach to hundreds of thousands of people, and through a dedicated B’Tselem digital newsletter to over 22,400 Israeli, Palestinian and international duty-bearers, academics, UN agencies, NGO’s, religious groups, thought-leaders and other interested citizens. The newsletter had an unusually high open rate of over 30% (1.5 times more than the average), and we received dozens of personal responses from recipients, many of which applauded this move and B’Tselem’s courage.

Whitewash Protocol

As part of B’Tselem’s strategic move to cease cooperation with the occupations’ whitewash mechanism, B’Tselem published a report titled “Whitewash Protocol: The So-Called Investigation of Operation Protective Edge”. Looking back over two years, the report describes Israel’s charade of investigating alleged breaches of law during the fighting in Gaza in the summer of 2014. Official claims that these suspicions are being investigated, along with a MAG update on his work on the matter, constitute little more than a façade.

Hagai El-Ad, executive director of B’Tselem announced the group will no longer act as Israel’s ‘useful idiot’ in referring complaints to  Israeli military’s internal investigative unit which invariably whitewashed the incident. Co-operation has ended. Photo by Emil Salman

The decision makers who are responsible for the deadly consequences of the operation – government officials and senior military commanders, including the MAG, who devised the policy and gave the orders – were never investigated and made sure to absolve themselves of accountability from the outset. The only investigations that were opened focused on the responsibility of lower ranks for what the military considers isolated “exceptional cases’. At the time of publication, some of the investigations were still under way, dozens were closed, and only one indictment was filed – against three soldiers for stealing 2,420 shekels.

In his response to the report, the IDF Spokesperson said that B’Tselem is waging a “de-legitimization campaign” against the military law enforcement system. Yet, this system cannot be considered legitimate until it ensures justice for victims and unless it seeks to uncover the truth and hold those responsible accountable.

B’Tselem sent out a press release announcing the publication: Decision Makers Who Led to Unprecedented Killing in Gaza Were Not Even Questioned, and B’Tselem’s research director wrote an op-ed titled How Israel Bombs Gaza with Impunity. MK Yair Lapid, the Chairman of the Yesh Atid Party, dedicated an op-ed in the Jerusalem Post in response to the publication, titled B’Tselem Lies.

In response to the misleading and inaccurate op-ed, Hagai El-Ad, replied in the Jerusalem Post with the facts as they are and the one question that remains: How did this happen? MK Lapid also dedicated a Facebook post in Hebrew to slandering B’Tselem’s report, to which we replied by saying that at least he got one thing right: B’Tselem argues that the responsibility for Operation Edge lies with him and the rest of the members of government at the time.

B’Tselem’s Facebook campaign on the report reached over 114K people. The report was cited by the media, notably by the New York Times: Rights Groups Criticize Israeli Inquiry into 2014 Gaza War. B’Tselem’s analysis on Gaza were also cited in an earlier New York Times article that month: Israel, Facing Criticism, to Investigate Possible Military Misconduct in Gaza.

B’Tselem held briefings on the report at the EU embassy in Tel Aviv (attended by Cyprus, Lithuania, Croatia, UK, Sweden, Denmark, Greece, Germany, Bulgaria, Finland, France, Belgium, Hungary, Spain, Netherlands and Ireland), and the US Embassy (7 staff members attended), as well as meetings in Washington DC and Brussels.

3. Israeli Security Force Violence

Extrajudicial Execution in Hebron

In March, the major incident where a soldier executed a Palestinian lying injured on ground, ‘Abd al- Fatah a-Sharif, after the latter stabbed a soldier in Hebron, was documented by B’Tselem’s video volunteer ‘Imad Abu Shamsiyeh. If it weren’t for his professionalism, this case, like many others, would have gone unnoticed.

Thanks to his documentation, B’Tselem was able to publicize the case widely and turn it into a one of the 2016’s biggest debates is Israel. It was covered extensively by the media both locally and internationally, and is still making waves in Israeli and international discourse on Israeli security force use of force. The footage received over 1 million views on B’Tselem’s YouTube alone.

Examples of major international media coverage of the shooting include: the New York Times; N-TV and ZDF (Germany); Al-Monitor (“Why Israel needs B’Tselem”); CNN; the BBC and Radio 4 (including an interview with B’Tselem spokesperson); the Independent (interview with Abu Shamsiyeh); and the Forward (Meet the West Bank Cobbler Who Took Video of Israeli Soldier Shooting Palestinian in Head). The issue was also addressed by UNOHCHR, including a comment by their spokesperson in Geneva.

Notably, there were multiple mainstream Israeli responses with surprisingly warm words for B’Tselem’s important role in fostering public debate in Israeli society, on the occupation. For example:
 Major General Ami Ayalon, Former ISA head, in a radio interview:

These gatekeepers are the ones that still confront us with a kind of mirror of who we are – although we look very, very bad in the mirror. After all, B’Tselem or MachsomWatch or Breaking the Silence are the organizations that still enable us to maintain some kind of connection with reality (…) The only yardstick by which we can argue with them is if the information they give us is untrue. And I’m telling you that, to date, nothing that has been said by Breaking the Silence, or by the women of MachsomWatch, or by the photographers of B’Tselem has been proven to be untrue. So not only do I not have any argument with them, but I would say that if we lose them, then I’d say that we’d truly become like animals, or any other comparison or adjective that might suit us. At the moment that isn’t the situation – only because of them.”

 RonenBergman,leading Israeli investigative journalist,wrote in Yedioth Ahronot an article entitled”Heroes – not enemies of the people”:

“B’Tselem is waging a fight in an impossible reality to uncover the truth of what is happening in the [occupied] territories, against the majority of the public who considers it an organization that ought to be destroyed (Minister Yuval Steinitz said B’Tselem was “on the verge of treason” – a capital offense), and with right-wing extremists and their representatives in the government striving to harm the organization and its sources of funding. Whenever Israel did venture to open an investigation pursuant to [revelations uncovered by] B’Tselem’s inquiries, these repeatedly proved to be accurate and reliable. Undoubtedly, had B’Tselem not filmed the clip but merely documented the incident, a complaint by an eyewitness claiming that the terrorist had been executed after already being injured and captured would have ended in nothing. A laconic sentence would conclude the investigation, saying that no evidence had been found, or that the Arab witness was lying. Who knows how many complaints about other incidents would have ended differently had they also been captured on video.”

As the case developed, Hagai El-Ad published an op-ed titled “A once-in-a-decade show trial” arguing the military trial of Azaria is part of a ritual that takes place every 10 years, whose purpose is to create the illusion of a functioning military justice system in order to normalize routine violence inherent in the occupation.

Following the publication of the incident, B’Tselem volunteer ‘Imad Abu Shamsiyeh received multiple death threats. Worried for his safety, B’Tselem wrote to the military and police commanders asking them to fulfil their duty in protecting him (see article in JPOST). Later on, the Hebron Police officers prevented him from lodging a complaint regarding death threats, themselves threatening him with arrest.

In the same context, B’Tselem published strong video documentation of an incident where settlers assaulted a Palestinian videographer in Hebron, wounding him in the head, while soldiers looked on. This was the most viewed video on our English Facebook page in 2016, reaching over 2 million people and viewed 404K times.

According to testimonies, prior to the execution of a-Sharif, Ramzi al-Qasrawi was also shot dead after having been injured and not posing a danger. The two eyewitnesses, both B’Tselem volunteers, documented parts of the incident, but not the moment he was shot.

Extrajudicial street killings are the direct consequence of inflammatory remarks made by Israeli ministers and officials, augmented by the general public atmosphere of dehumanization. The law enforcement authorities are by and large turning a blind eye to repeated grave suspicions of extrajudicial killing by the security forces, and these are backed in the field by commanders. The message to the Israeli public is undeniable: attempting to injure a civilian or a soldier is a death sentence.

Fatality Watch

Since October 2015, Palestinians have perpetrated dozens of attacks on Israeli civilians and members of Israel’s security forces. In 2016, B’Tselem published seven updates on attacks on Israeli civilians by Palestinians which caused Israeli fatalities. Assaults have taken the form of stabbings, car-ramming and gunfire in which Palestinians killed 25 Israeli civilians, two foreign civilians and six members of Israel’s security forces.

Up to December 2016, 168 of the alleged assailants were shot dead by members of the security forces or civilians, and a further four Palestinians were shot dead during these incidents, who were not involved in the hostilities. B’Tselem published and updated information on each and every case of Palestinians killed by Israeli security forces in the West Bank, and the overall statistics of fatalities on its website.

In addition to the Hebron shooting, multiple additional fatality cases, equally disturbing, were researched and published by B’Tselem during 2016, including use of press releases and a social media campaign, and therefore brought to the attention of the public.

B’Tselem published research on the extrajudicial killing at the Tomb of Patriarchs (including video footage); a suspicion that an Israeli Border Police fired without justification at car in a-Ram, killing the driver; a case where a sniper killed a man in al-Fawwar RC; and another case where a soldier killed a man in Silwad though he posed no danger to anyone. B’Tselem’s documentation is vital for these cases and is used extensively by the media and for investigation that may be opened. For example, see Haaretz on military investigations of fatalities, quoting B’Tselem’s research.

B’Tselem also published an analysis of the case of Mustafa Tamimi, who was killed in 2011. Contrary to facts and regulations, the MAG Corps found, in February 2016, that the soldier who killed Tamimi acted lawfully. This case, yet again, shows that attempting to attain justice through the military system is futile.

In Gaza, B’Tselem researched and published that five Palestinians were killed when Israeli military fired at protesters near the Gaza perimeter fence (including footage of wounding and gunfire at paramedics and journalists); and that once again: Israeli military unlawfully shot and killed a Gazan protester, and no-one will be held to account. To this are added multiple cases of killing of minors, detailed below.
B’Tselem also published video documentation of the incident where a military sniper shot a Palestinian man standing on his rooftop 4 times, injuring his hand and legs – another case of illegal use of firearms, which luckily did not end in a fatality.

Violations Against Children

B’Tselem researched and documented multiple violations against children by Israeli security forces during 2016, including cases of killing, abuse and harassment.
28 minors were killed by Israeli security forces in the West Bank in 2016. In addition to publication of all
incident details, B’Tselem published detailed research into the closing of the case against Col. Shomer – who killed a Palestinian 17-year-old who threw a stone at his vehicle. He was shot in the back with no justification, while fleeing, and part of the incident was captured on a security camera (over 250K views on B’Tselem’s YouTube and Facebook page). This research was well covered by the media, for example in the Washington Post and the Israeli TV show Today’s Talk (interview with B’Tselem’s spokesperson). B’Tselem’s English Facebook post on this case reached 228K people (video viewed 47K times).

B’Tselem also researched the cases of the unwarranted killing of the siblings at the Qalandiya checkpoint (Ibrahim Taha, 16); the case of Mahmoud Badran, 15, from Beit Ur a-Tahta – soldiers shot and killed him and wounded four of his friends (B’Tselem was cited in The Israel Broadcasting Authority and Ha’aretz). Hagai El-Ad wrote an op-ed on the case, titled Under occupation, Palestinian teens are always killed by ‘mistake’; and the case where Israeli Border Police fire black sponge round at chest of 10-year-old boy in a-Ram, killing him.

B’Tselem also published the response of the security establishment to the killing of two Palestinians and the injuring of another in October 2016. The injured youth died of his wound (two of the victims were minors).
In Gaza, three minors were killed in 2016. B’Tselem published research into the two cases: Israeli military bombs training camp; two children killed in their beds, and a soldier killed a Palestinian teen who posed no threat by firing flare bomb at him across Israel-Gaza fence.

B’Tselem video volunteers documented multiple cases of violations against children in Hebron, in particular, in 2016. These cases garnered huge attention from the public and the media, especially the case where a Border Police officer threw a child’s bike into bushes for daring to play on street reserved for settlers.

The film clip was screened at the Other Israel Film Festival in New York City. Chelsey Berlin, Director of B’Tselem USA, explained the context to the clip in a Panel Discussion on The Power of Film, together with Michael Moore, filmmaker & activist, and Israeli filmmakers. B’Tselem also sent out a press release on the case, which received huge coverage both locally and internationally, including in The Times of Israel; RT; The Telegraph; The Independent; The Jerusalem Post; NRG; Israel Today; Ynet; Haaretz; Nana; and more, leading to the suspension of the Israeli Border Police Officer.

Notably, Israeli MK Ayman Odeh used the footage shot by B’Tselem in a speech and powerful video he shared on social networks: One day children will play happily in streets of independent Palestine. On B’Tselem’s YouTube, the footage got over 276K views, in addition to 675K people reached via Facebook and 60K via Twitter.
B’Tselem volunteers also documented on video soldiers gathering children, photographing them for future identification before releasing them. The FB reach of this case was huge, with over 410K people reached through B’Tselem’s Facebook pages, and some 67,000 video views. The case was also covered in Haaretz. Later there was another case published where Border police undertook a lineup of Palestinian children for benefit of settlers, which also received huge attention on social media.

Beating and abuse of children was also part of the 2016 routine. B’Tselem researched the case were Israeli soldiers allegedly beat teenagers in al-Janiyah they suspected of throwing stones. The soldiers’ alleged violence against the two teens is yet one more instance in a series of incidents documented by B’Tselem throughout the West Bank, in which Israeli security forces assaulted Palestinian youths, arguing that they had thrown stones or knew of others involved in such activity. B’Tselem also published footage of an officer knocking an 11-year-old to the ground in Zabubah (59K people reached on Twitter and nearly 100K on Facebook), and of a 7-year-old caught in soldier stakeout at Kafr Qadum protest. B’Tselem sent out a press release on the latter incident, which Al-Jazeera took up, reaching 1.5 million views and was also covered in Middle East Monitor and Yahoo News (and over 650K people reached on B’Tselem’s Facebook). In Gaza, Israeli soldiers severely abused six Gazan detainees, including three minors.


Multiple cases of security forces’ harassment were published by B’Tselem in 2016, many of them in Hebron, leading to attention in the press and social media. We reported on stores in al-Birah, Area A, ruined after security forces cause fire and leave; on Israeli military isolating Palestinian neighbourhoods in downtown Hebron, making daily life an ordeal; on Hebron settlers holding a mass Sabbath dinner while the Israeli military takes over nearby Palestinian homes to secure the celebration (including video, covered in Ynet in both Hebrew and English); on continued collective punishment in central Hebron: Closed neighbourhoods and shops closed and repeated checkpoint inspections (including three videos); on violent night-time search by Israeli military in the home of a widow, raising suspicion of deliberate harassment; and on life under occupation: eight family members arrested in violent night raid of their home; seven released, most of them after a week.

4. Area C

As before, Israel continued to treat Area C as though it were its own sovereign territory and meant to serve Israeli needs alone: expanding settlements; demolishing hundreds of homes and structures, restricting access to water and electricity, conducting military trainings, and aiming to expel the local Palestinian communities.

During 2016, B’Tselem researched and published 36 updates on developments in Area C, which included 12 short videos from footage taken by our volunteers – including demolitions of donor funded structures. The updates focused on the wave of demolitions as well as issues such as closing down of Palestinian quarries; restrictions on access to water; confiscations; and temporary displacements caused by military training.

Stop the Expulsion

In August 2015, the Israeli authorities launched an unprecedented demolition campaign in the West Bank, destroying around 100 structures, half of them residences, where more than 200 people lived, including roughly 100 minors. The wave of demolitions, seen at the time as exceptional in scope, was unofficially halted in late 2015 due to the Jewish and Muslim holidays. It resumed in early 2016.

As months went by, the seemingly exceptional scope of demolitions observed in 2015 took hold as the new norm and the new Israeli policy throughout Area C. In 2016, Israel demolished 274 homes in the West Bank (excluding East Jerusalem), leaving 1,134 individuals, including 591 minors, homeless. The destruction wreaked by Israel during this year surpasses the number of homes it demolished in the West Bank in 2014 and 2015 put together.

This policy, upheld by all state authorities, severely violates the most fundamental human rights of Palestinians and offers decisive evidence as to Israel’s long-term plans: continued control of the area, while oppressing and dispossessing its residents.

Thousands of people – residents of dozens of Palestinian communities located throughout Area C – are living in a coercive environment which is designed to push them out for good.
in 2016 and before, hundreds of Palestinians who live in the Jordan Valley have had to look on as the land on which they live and graze their flocks was used by Israeli troops for military training. In June, B’Tselem published that 375 Palestinians, more than half of them minors, were temporarily displaced due to military training in the Jordan Valley. Since the end of September 2016, the military conducted training throughout the Jordan Valley on 20 separate occasions, including 19 times that Palestinian residents were made to leave their homes, fields and livestock to make way for the training. In some cases, families with children have no proper place to go to and have no choice but to remain out in the open, exposed to the elements, where they must provide food, water and shelter for themselves. At times, when they return they find unexploded ammunition and damage to their farmlands and property.

B’Tselem collected up-to-date information, data, photos and videos from the communities on the ground, empowering them to defend their own rights by contributing to the field-research, meeting with visiting groups and speaking in Israeli and international forums. The information from the ground was verified by B’Tselem’s Area C expert data coordinator, and posted on B’Tselem’s Facing Expulsion Live Blog.

The live blog hosts an interactive map where you can click on a community cluster for further information. The map also shows the locations of land declared national parks and nature reserves or firing zones. The blog pages in Arabic, Hebrew and English were viewed 6,746 times in 2016.

B’Tselem maintained a comprehensive demolition database with information regarding every demolition in area C, and published the overall demolition data periodically. In Spring 2016, B’Tselem published a major consolidation of all the data we collected over several years, from 2006 onwards. This meticulous data informed B’Tselem’s public outreach and advocacy efforts on the issue, which emphasized the scope of demolitions.

International Advocacy
As this man-made humanitarian crisis grows in scale, and is met with almost no international consequences, there is an urgent need for timely, strong calls for action. As one of the leading Israeli human rights organizations, with a clear voice criticizing Israeli policies, B’Tselem worked hard to bring the systematic violation of rights of vulnerable Palestinian communities to the attention of the international community.
In December, B’Tselem sent out a special diplomatic newsletter briefing to a list of hundreds of diplomats on the issue of military training as a tool for displacement in the Jordan Valley, stating that this repeated displacement of Palestinians causes intolerable disruption of their lives. Official confirmation that the removal of Palestinians from these areas is one of the main goals behind the military training in the area was provided in the hearing of the “Yogev” Knesset Subcommittee in 2014. As the occupying power in the West Bank, Israel is not permitted to use the area for routine military purposes such as general or combat training.

The restrictions on access to water were also of special concern during 2016. B’Tselem took multiple testimonies on the issue, and published a short research update on access to water accompanied by 3 short videos, and a social media campaign. B’Tselem held a special field visit for diplomats to the Jordan Valley in December, focusing on the issue of water, attended by 34 members of the diplomatic community travelling in a convoy of 13 jeeps.

In February, B’Tselem held a large briefing event in Jerusalem on the issue of Area C, attended by over 40 diplomats and UN staff, where we demonstrated the surge in recent demolitions, including of donor-funded humanitarian equipment, and the need for the international community to step up their actions.
B’Tselem’s International Relations Team, Field Research Director, Research Director and Data Coordinators held dozens of meetings and conversations with diplomats and government officials from Europe, the US, and the
global south, including several targeted advocacy missions in Brussels and European capitals, to share B’Tselem’s concerns about Israeli polices of demolition and dispossession in Area C, in addition to participation in multiple roundtables, receptions and other events.

B’Tselem held over 30 field visits for the international community to Area C during 2016, including for diplomats stationed in Israel and the oPt, senior clergy, visiting government officials, rabbis, UN agencies and international advocacy organizations. These included three large field visits targeting diplomats, to the Jordan Valley and the “E1” area, the latter focusing on access to education. Dozens of diplomats from multiple embassies, consulates and representative offices attended these briefings, including many European governments, the EU states, the UK, the US, Japan and several governments from the global south. The diplomats were briefed by B’Tselem’s staff on ground, and heard directly from members of the communities on their lives under threat of expulsion. They also received maps and a dedicated briefing sheet prepared for each one of the visits.

The Danish Representative Office tweeted after one of the visits: “We joined @btselem tour in area C yd. Focusing on settlements and beduins. As always factual and nuanced updates. Critical issue to follow.” B’Tselem also received many personal thank you notes from diplomats following the field visits, for example: “I would like to thank you again for the most interesting visit yesterday. It was very well organized. It also presented a specific aspect of the situation in zone C which I believe add a great added-value for our group. Those visits are an excellent opportunity to get a more hands-on understanding of the situation on the ground. I am certainly interested to participate to future visits you may organize.”

B’Tselem put a special focus during this period on recruiting women in remote communities in the Jordan Valley as B’Tselem video volunteers, where we formerly had only male volunteers. Six new women volunteers from the area joined the project. B’Tselem’s video team visited the area frequently to work with the women on video diaries, filmed by the women, telling their stories. The publication of three diaries is planned for 2017.

B’Tselem worked with the media, publishing tri-lingual press releases, accompanying journalists to communities at risk of demolition, and connecting them with Palestinians impacted by the threats to their communities. This work resulted in multiple articles quoting B’Tselem or its data on Area C, as well as op-eds and interviews. A selection for example: The Times of Israel; 972 Magazine; Maan News Agency; i24 News; Al-Jazeera; Al- Monitor; The Jerusalem Post; The Washington Post; Reuters; Haaretz; The Guardian; Ynet; The Nation; Sky News Australia; World Post; and Russia Today.

Hagai El-Ad, B’Tselem’s executive director, wrote an outspoken op-ed ‘Rubble and dust: How EU keeps
failing Palestinians’, which was published in the EU observer in April. The article was also translated and published in the major Swedish paper Aftonbladet as well as the Belgian magazine Knack. In the op-ed, El-Ad made an urgent plea to Europe to take action. He concluded that “The choice is clear: will Europe continue to provide Israel with the go-ahead for further violations of international humanitarian law and a policy of forced displacement? Too much rubble has already settled on the ground, too much dust already clouds the future. The time for words has long passed: it is time to, finally, take action.”

B’Tselem published many dozens of posts on its social networks, sharing photos, videos and information on communities facing expulsion in Area C, reaching hundreds of thousands of people. B’Tselem also leveraged its online “Eyes Wide Open” Photo blog to share photos from a visit to Masafer Yatta, as the efforts to expel its residents escalated – one day before Israel’s High Court of Justice held a hearing on a petition filed by the residents of Masafer Yatta against the Israeli Authorities’ intention to expel them from their homes due to the establishment of “Firing Zone 918.”

B’Tselem produced a short video titled A few facts about the south Hebron Hills – which was viewed over 68K times on B’Tselem’s Facebook pages. It was published in reaction to an inflammatory TV report, which was based on materials supplied by a settler organization, as part of a smear campaign against Israeli human rights organizations, completely ignoring Israel’s illegal policies in the area.

B’Tselem helped organize and guided a field visit for a famous Danish pop star, Shaka Loveless, to Badu al- Baba. A video produced on his visit stars a B’Tselem volunteer, incorporates footage shot by B’Tselem’s volunteers, and features an interview with B’Tselem’s spokesperson.

B’Tselem worked in cooperation with several members of the Israeli parliament to convene a conference at the Israeli Knesset on Area C in July. EU ambassador to Israel Lars Faaborg-Andersen opened the conference, followed by an UNOHCHR representative. B’Tselem Executive Director Hagai El-Ad delivered sharp remarks demanding action from Israel to address this untenable situation. Hagai’s speech was published in English. Several additional organizations working in Area C spoke, as well as representatives from Palestinian communities in Area C, on how Israeli policies affect their daily lives. The conference generated a strong headline in Haaretz: EU Slams Israel’s Destruction of Palestinian Homes in West Bank’s Area C: “European Union ambassador to Israel Lars Faaborg-Andersen criticized Israel on Wednesday for destroying Palestinian homes in Area C of the West Bank. Faaborg-Andersen said at a conference at the Knesset that from 2009 to 2013 Israel had provided only 44 building permits to Palestinians in response to about 2,000 requests.” As well as this headline in the JPost: UN: Israel policies forcing Palestinians to leave Area C of the West Bank. The conference was an important opportunity for B’Tselem and colleagues to speak about these issues at the Knesset.

B’Tselem issued a new report – Expel and Exploit: The Israeli Practice of Taking over Rural Palestinian Land. The report surveys the fragmentation of Palestinian rural space in the West Bank through a case study of the process that three villages in the Nablus District – ‘Azmut, Deir al-Hatab and Salem – have undergone since 1980, when Israel established the Elon Moreh settlement nearby.

Mahyoub Shtiyeh, 42, from Salem tells B’Tselem they have lost their grazing land to settlers. Palestinians have used it since biblical times. Now they are force to keep their sheep inside because of settler attacks.

Separating the residents of these Palestinian villages from their farmland, pastureland, and natural water resources – while the nearby settlements expand their built-up areas and the land they use for farming and pasture – has undermined the villagers’ way of life. The collapse of their self-sustaining economy has reduced many villagers to a life of poverty, food insecurity and social instability. Denied access to the natural resources that used to be the mainstay of their livelihoods – and cut off from urban centres, roads, and communities that share their customs and social structure – a local way of life and unique cultural identity has been devastated.

B’Tselem dedicated a photo blog to the report, taken by Faiz Abu Rmeleh, from Activestills. The photos were also incorporated into our social media campaign on the report, which reached over 261K people on Facebook alone. B’Tselem also sent out a press release and disseminated the report though the digital newsletter. B’Tselem held a dedicated field visit to the areas covered by the report, for journalists. The report was covered in the New York Review of Books; by David Shulman, in an article titled Palestine: The End of the Bedouins? It was also cited in Lemonde; Haaretz – Gideon Levy; Haaretz – op-ed; and the Washington Post; The Social TV; Maan News; Middle East Monitor (“B’Tselem: ‘Dispossession of Palestinians most consistent trend in Israeli policy’”); and Asia News.

In addition, a small case of settler violence B’Tselem documented – photos of the word ‘revenge’ written in stones by settlers near Sussiya – was published in seven Israeli news sites, including Haaretz Hebrew; Haaretz English; Mako; Walla; Nana10; Megaphone; Mekomit; and Kol Hazman.
An important development regarding settlements during 2016, following the Amona case, was the approval by the Knesset’s Constitution, Law, and Justice Committee of the Regulation Law. B’Tselem responded by
publishing an op-ed by Hagai El-Ad in both Hebrew and English, arguing it constitutes a fighting match between thieves: “The spirit of dispossession by the state has thrived and flourished for half a century … Quibbling over the fine print with the settlers of Amona — and of other settlements — “just” because they did not distinguish public Arab land from private Arab land? Seriously: for as far as the state is concerned, they are one and the same: Arabs are Arabs and their land is ours to hold.”

5. Gaza
Facts and Figures on Fatalities in Protective Edge

After two years of intense research and documentation, B’Tselem published comprehensive data on fatalities in Operation “Protective Edge”, marking two years since the operation. 1391, or 63%, of the 2,202 Palestinians killed by Israeli security forces in the operation did not take part in the hostilities. Of these, 526 – a quarter of all Palestinians killed in the operation – were children under eighteen years of age. Additionally, 17 children were killed while participating in the hostilities, and for an additional three, B’Tselem was unable to ascertain whether they had taken part in the hostilities. Of the 72 Israelis killed in the operation, six were civilians (including one Thai national), including a four-year-old child, and 62 were soldiers killed by Palestinians. Three soldiers were killed by accident by other Israeli soldiers, and one in an operational accident.

B’Tselem’s data is based on a meticulous, exhaustive investigation carried out by the organization’s field researchers in Gaza, then verified and analyzed by the data coordinators in Jerusalem. The information is available in an interactive format that enables searches by age, gender, location, and other criteria.

The high number of civilian fatalities – including women, children, and the elderly – casts doubt on Israel’s claim that all the targets were legitimate and that the military adhered to the principle of proportionality during the attacks and took precautions to reduce harm to civilians. While the fighting was still in progress, B’Tselem already cautioned against the predictable lethal consequences of the military’s open-fire policy, which included air strikes on homes that killed many civilians who were not taking part in the hostilities (see B’Tselem report Black Flag). Decision makers continued to apply this policy, in spite of these results.

B’Tselem’s research was covered in the media in Israel, and internationally (such as this Spanish newspaper), and were cited by “Every Casualty Worldwide” (on the International Committee of the Red Cross website) as an example “of current casualty recording projects which publish casualty records in this detailed and disaggregated way include … the Israeli Information Center for Human Rights in the Occupied Territories (B’Tselem), which records, among other things, all individuals killed in the ongoing conflict in the Occupied Territories. B’Tselem’s Facebook posts on the figures reached over 208K people.

Life Under Israeli Blockade
Beyond the destruction wrought by Protective Edge, Gazans continue to suffer from severe violations of human rights and IHL caused by the Israeli blockade, ongoing since shortly after Hamas took control of Gaza in 2007, by Israel’s control over extensive aspects of life in Gaza, and by continued fighting. During 2016, B’Tselem published several research updates, on issues such as patients who cannot get proper treatment in Gaza or elsewhere; Israel spraying Gazan farmland close to border fence, destroying crops and causing heavy losses;
and on the fact one quarter of Gazan requests for cancer treatment in Israel or the West Bank are denied or ignored (cited in the Middle East Monitor).

B’Tselem produced and published three video campaigns during the report period, bringing the harsh daily reality in Gaza to the attention of Israeli and international publics, with a special focus on women. This strategy was chosen because of the invisibility of life in Gaza, which is seldom seen by outsiders:

My Own Private Gaza – Reinventing Electricity: What do you do when there’s no electricity or access to advanced technology? Enterprise, innovation and ingenuity try to fill the void. Khaled al-‘Azayzeh, a B’Tselem field researcher in the Gaza Strip, brings us a portrait of Gaza as seen through his own eyes. A third instalment in a series. (over 13K views on Hebrew and English FB).

International Women’s Day 2016: The demand for work in the Gaza Strip is enormous, with an unemployment rate of some 40%. The major reason is the siege Israel has imposed on Gaza. To mark International Women’s Day, we spoke with three women – a carpenter, a blacksmith, and a vegetable market laborer – who are all trying to sustain families in this near-impossible economic reality. Gazan women face a particularly trying challenge, as they must deal not only with the dearth of work to match their skills, but also, like women around the world, with a society in which women are considered inferior and work harder for lower pay. (over 43K views on Hebrew and English FB).
Int’l Workers’ Day 2016: Desperate to make a living in Gaza: Nine years have passed since Israel began its blockade on Gaza, paralyzing the job market in an area inhabited by two million people. The right to work and make a decent living are both basic human rights. On 1 May 2016, we highlighted the stories of four professionals desperate for work in Gaza. (over 57K views on Hebrew and English FB).
In April, B’Tselem held two public screening events at the Solidarity Festival at the Tel Aviv Cinematheque, one of them on Gaza, with about 80% of the 300 seats in each theater taken. Connected (Disconnected) in Gaza told the story of humour and ingenuity filling the void and boredom: a direct view of life in Gaza through a collection of B’Tselem’s footage, followed by a Skype conversation with Khaled al-‘Azayzeh, B’Tselem field researcher and resident of Gaza, who answered questions from the audience with patience and sensitivity. The event allowed the Israeli audience to see Gazan reality, which is usually framed by the press, in a completely new way, conveying the simple fact that real people with real day-to-day problems are living in the strip.

B’Tselem’s other event at the festival, Women Documenting the Occupation, began with the screening of the Women Next Door, a film by Michal Aviad (three filmmakers, two Israelis and one Palestinian, explore the role the occupation has created for women on both sides), followed by a screening of a selection of videos filmed by B’Tselem’s women volunteer videographers in the West Bank from 2008 until recently, curated by Helen Yanovsky from B’Tselem’s video team. The screening was followed by a lively panel with director Michal Aviad and volunteer videographers from the West Bank, hosted by B’Tselem spokesperson, Sarit Michaeli. Feedback from the audience indicated they were especially affected by the participation of the volunteers, a rare people- to-people encounter for Palestinians and Israelis. B’Tselem was able to attain permits to host 26 of the women video volunteers at the screening, and took the opportunity to let them enjoy a day in Tel Aviv. Three additional women volunteers were denied a permit by the Israeli authorities.

6. East Jerusalem
Since East Jerusalem was annexed in 1967, the government of Israel’s primary goal in Jerusalem has been to create a demographic and geographic reality that will thwart any future attempt to challenge Israeli sovereignty over the city. To achieve this goal, the government has been taking actions to increase the number of Jews and reduce the number of Palestinians living in the city. During 2016, B’Tselem researched and published explicit examples of this policy, starting with the planned expansion of Gilo in January, which creates an annexable bloc that includes the Cremisan Valley and extends to Har Gilo.

B’Tselem also updates comprehensive statistics on demolition of houses built without permits in East Jerusalem, on its website. B’Tselem researched and published the story of Bab al- Majles, a neighbourhood in the heart of the Old City of Jerusalem. Once a rich cultural and social hub, a major route crossed by Muslim worshippers on their way to al-Aqsa Mosque, the neighbourhood has choked under severe access restrictions, which severely harm residents’ lives and livelihoods. B’Tselem accompanied the publication with a Photo blog on the neighbourhood.

Since 2010, Israel has severely restricted access to the Palestinian village of Beit Iksa, which lies northwest of Jerusalem, in order to prevent Palestinians from entering Jerusalem. Instead of building the separationbarrier along the Green Line in the area, Israel has chosen a restrictive route which results in severe effects on employment, education, basic services and communal ties. The choice to impose these draconian measures reflects absolute prioritization of Israeli interests over the protection of local residents’ rights.

B’Tselem also published that Israel demolished 13 homes in Qalandia al-Balad, close to the Separation Barrier. Since Qalandia and other neighbourhoods were cut off by the Barrier, the Jerusalem Municipality has virtually halted the supply of municipal services and rarely enforces building laws. As a result, Palestinians from East Jerusalem have been attracted to the area. In a rare exception to its usual policy, the Jerusalem Municipality has decided to provide a service in the area: house demolitions.

Towards the end of 2016, B’Tselem mapped the expulsion processes underway in Batan al-Hawa, which is facing the most extensive dispossession in East Jerusalem in recent years. Israeli authorities have already transferred nine of its roughly 50 parcels to the Ateret Cohanim association, and settlers have moved in to five.

Eviction claims are pending against 81 Palestinian families who have lived in the neighbourhood for decades. Residents are also subjected to other types of pressure. Settler presence brings with it the police, the Border Police and private security guards; they regularly use violence against local residents, including live fire and crowd control measures, threats, and disrupting the fabric of life. Settlers also block the road several times a day, with police backing, disrupting lives of local Palestinians.

Roads are frequenly blocked by settlers and/or the army. The aim is, as usual, to keep all Palestinians confined to isolatd bantustans.Photo B’Tselem Facebook page.

In addition, Settlers’ presence in Batan al-Hawa results in local minors being arrested and detained by security forces.

B’Tselem conducted five field visits to the neighbourhood for diplomats, UN staffers and members of the international community, raising awareness and knowledge of the issue. B’Tselem also sent out a press release detailing the results of our mapping, and took an Israeli journalist on field visit, who then published a TV news item about violence against minors in the neighbourhood on Israel’s Channel 10. B’Tselem’s Jerusalem field researcher, Hussam Abed, wrote an op- ed which was published in Israeli news site Mako. Reliefweb also reported on B’Tselem’s mapping on their website.

7. Collective Punishment

Punitive Home Demolitions

The extent of employing house demolition as a punitive action has varied over the years. In February 2005 a military committee determined that the efficacy of the house demolition policy as a counter-terrorism tool was questionable, and that it “walked the line” of legality.

The Minister of Defence adopted the committee’s recommendations, and the Israeli security establishment stopped using this measure, with few exceptions. In the summer of 2014, following the abduction of three yeshiva students at the Gush Etzion junction, and their subsequent killing, the security establishment resumed punitive house demolitions. No explanation was given as to why the former recommendations were disregarded.

The people who bear the brunt of the demolitions are relatives – including women, the elderly, and children – whom Israel does not suspect of involvement in any offense. This Israeli government policy is consistently approved by the High Court of Justice.

Since the escalation of violence in October 2015, Israel has intensified its use of house demolitions as collective punishment for the families of Palestinians who perpetrated attacks against Israelis or are suspected of perpetrating or aiding such attacks. Since then, the authorities have demolished 23 apartments by official order, and rendered two nearby apartments uninhabitable, leaving at total of 118 people homeless, including 47 minors. In addition, the authorities fully or partially sealed five apartments, leaving 20 people homeless, including 7 minors.

B’Tselem published several updates on the issue during the year: Israel demolished three homes in January in punitive actions, leaving 18 persons homeless; 29 demolitions carried out since Oct. 2015; Israel continues policy of collective punishment: Military punishes 15 people, incl. 9 minors, for their relatives’ actions, demolishing their homes; Israeli security forces demolish four families’ homes, punishing 28 people, including 6 minors, for actions of persons no longer alive; Massive collective punishment: homes of 149 Palestinians suspected of no wrongdoing demolished since Oct. 2015; hundreds more under threat.

Restrictions on Movement

Israel’s restrictions on Palestinians’ freedom of movement in the West Bank are enforced by a system of fixed checkpoints, surprise flying checkpoints, hundreds of physical obstructions, roads on which Palestinians are forbidden to travel, and gates along the Separation Barrier. The restrictions enable Israel to control Palestinian movement throughout the West Bank as suits its interests, based on a racist argument that every Palestinian is a security threat, in a sweeping breach of Palestinians’ rights, which makes it prohibited collective punishment.

In late January 2017, the military blocked off vehicle access via the main entrance of Palestinian village of ‘Azzun – and kept the entrance shut nearly continuously for two and a half weeks – as collective punishment for incidents in which stones and Molotov cocktails were hurled and live ammunition fired at the major traffic artery that runs close to the village.

At the end of 2016, there were 98 fixed checkpoints in the West Bank, including 59 internal checkpoints, located well within the West Bank. B’Tselem updated the full list of checkpoints and related data on its website.

In addition, temporary travel restrictions imposed on entire areas in 2016, following attacks perpetuated by Palestinians, constituted blatant collective punishment and belied Israel’s claim that large parts of the West Bank have been transferred over to Palestinian control, and that it no longer administers them. Israel easily manages to disrupt the lives of hundreds of thousands of Palestinians, whether they live in Area A, B or C, while the Palestinian Authority has no power to intervene or influence these decisions and actions.

B’Tselem dedicated four in-depth updates to the issue in 2016, covering the following areas: Dura: Entire town harassed for a month for being hometown of suspected assailant; Al-Fawwar R.C.: Closure severely disrupted lives of its 10,000 residents, harmed livelihood and was particularly difficult for the elderly and patients (including video); Hebron District: Israel punishes hundreds of thousands of Palestinians for the actions of individuals; Nablus Area: Israel imposes traffic restrictions, disrupting lives of over 54,000 Palestinians.

B’Tselem also assisted journalist Amira Haas in preparing an article on the blocking of the village of Dayr Nizam, which B’Tselem reported on its Facebook page.

In July, B’Tselem documented the inhuman conditions at checkpoint 300 and Qalandia checkpoint, publishing research and two short, shocking, videos.

Of some 100,000 Palestinians who work in Israel daily, 63,000 have permits and enter Israel via one of 11 checkpoints. Even in Ramadan, when workers fast all day, they are forced to leave for work in the dead of night, wait in long lines, and often sleep where they work and see their families only on weekends. This is not a necessary evil, but a deliberate choice by the Israeli authorities. Whatever the reasons, it is immoral and unacceptable.

8. Prisoners and Detainees

At the end of August 2016, 5,988 Palestinian security detainees and prisoners were held in Israeli prisons, 336 of them from the Gaza Strip. An additional 910 Palestinians were held in Israel Prison Service (IPS) facilities for being in Israel illegally, 10 of them from the Gaza Strip. A few dozen other Palestinians are held in IDF facilities for short periods of time. This data was provided by the military and by the IPS. Since May 2016, despite repeated requests, the IPS has not conveyed figures to B’Tselem on a regular basis.

The number of administrative detainees as well as the number of women and minors in custody are the highest they have been in years. in October 2015, Israel resumed its use of administrative detention against Palestinian minors, for the first time since December 2011. At the end of August 2016, 644 Palestinians – including 1 woman and 10 minors – were held in administrative detention in IPS facilities.

Administrative detention is based on classified “evidence” that is not revealed to the detainee nor their lawyer, so they cannot refute it in a fair legal process, and has no maximum time limit. By law, administrative detention is subject to judicial review. However, in the vast majority of cases, the judges approve the detention orders.

B’Tselem followed closely the case of hunger striker journalist Muhammad Al-Qiq, who launched a hunger strike to protest his administrative detention. In January, B’Tselem cautioned that the life of al-Qiq, on hunger strike for 65 days, was in danger. In February, Israel’s HCJ refused to rescind the administrative detention of Al- Qiq. That month, B’Tselem’s Executive Director wrote to the Prime Minister demanding he order the immediate release of al-Qiq. According to media reports, al-Qiq and the Israeli authorities reached an agreement whereby he would end his 93-day hunger strike, and then be released from administrative detention, in May.

B’Tselem also published the case of Bilal Kayed, who finished serving a 141⁄2-year prison sentence. His family was then told that he was not being released, and was being placed in administrative detention for a further six months. This case was covered by El-Mundo including an interview with Hagai El-Ad on administrative detention.

Israel recently agreed to stop renewing the administrative detention of three Palestinians who went on hunger strike to protest against being held without trial or time limit. Risking their lives is the only way for such detainees to go free, to challenge the injustice, and to prevent repeated renewal of their detention, given that judicial review is a mere formality. The fact that Israel insists in holding them even on the verge of death belies that argument that they are being held to prevent a threat to public security. This practice must stop.

In March, B’Tselem published an analysis of trends in 2015 inmate figures, showing a record number of Palestinians held in Israel. The figures for 2015 showed a 250% increase in the number of Palestinian minors in custody. At the end of August 2016, 319 Palestinian minors were held in Israeli prisons as security detainees and prisoners. Another 10 Palestinian minors were held in Israel Prison Service facilities for being in Israel illegally.

An important case in 2016 was of a Palestinian 12-year-old sentenced to 41⁄2 months in prison – probably the youngest girl imprisoned in history of the occupation, researched by B’Tselem’s team. B’Tselem believes that our research in this case and publication of the incident, leading to pressure and campaigns by other organizations, led to her early release from prison. The case was widely covered in the media, especially upon her release. A sample of media coverage citing B’Tselem: American Herald Tribune; The Forward; Haaretz; The New York Times; and Israel Channel 10.

9. Attacks on Human Rights Organizations

Along with the entire human rights community in Israel, B’Tselem endured multiple attacks during 2016, including numerous cyber-attacks on our website and servers, massive hate speech on social networks (thousands of violent innuendos and threats), direct threats on staff members, threatening phone calls, and more. These were accompanied by dedicated smear campaigns against the organization, initiated by right wing groups such as Im Tirzu and Ad Kan (which led to the false arrest and release – after six days – of B’Tselem’s field researcher, Nasser Nawaj’ah), as well as direct attacks on our funding sources.

The Israeli government led this incitement by denouncing B’Tselem and fellow organizations, such as Breaking the Silence, as enemies of the state, and directing attacks at us and other organizations via legislation and intimidation. In July 2016, The NGO “Transparency” Bill, which shames Israeli human rights organizations, like B’Tselem, as foreign agents, was passed by the Knesset. The law requires organizations to note foreign governmental funding on publications, communications with decision-makers, and in Knesset appearances.

Notably, an article was published about the impact of the NGO law on B’Tselem’s Palestinian video volunteers. The government’s attempts to stigmatize and silence our work indicate B’Tselem’s importance and impact, along with its refusal to accept any criticism. The occupation is a glaring injustice that must end. The harder they try to deter us from exposing the facts, the more determined we will be to be heard.

Throughout the year, B’Tselem put an emphasis on coordinated action with the Israeli human rights community. We published a printed ad in January in Ha’aretz, along with another 14 Israeli human rights organizations, expressing opposition to the proposed laws that seek to silence opposition to government policy in the oPt. We later published another printed ad in Ha’aretz , after the bill was formalized in July, along with another 20 organizations, stating that “we may not have succeeded in stopping the NGO bill, but the NGO bill will not succeed in stopping us”.

B’Tselem also sent two press releases together with additional organizations in solidarity with Palestinian and international organizations under attack: Israeli Human Rights Organizations to the Israeli Government: Aid Organizations Perform Vital Work in the Gaza Strip and Statement of Solidarity: Israeli human rights and civil society organizations condemn attacks against Al-Haq.

On February 5, B’Tselem jointly produced a large public event at the Tel Aviv Port -“Blacklisted”. We enlisted support from a wide coalition of NGO’s, including many that will not be affected by the NGO Law. 50 organizations participated in the Blacklist solidarity event from across Israeli society, including LGBT, environmental and community organizations. Leading Israeli artists, NGOs, and public figures, stood in solidarity for freedom of expression, creation, and thought. “Blacklisted: A Show with a Glimmer of Hope”, featured performances and remarks by Israeli artists and leaders. It was attended by over 2,000 people.

In the international arena, B’Tselem brought the shrinking space for civil society and the increasing hostility and attacks against B’Tselem in Israel to the attention of key governments and international organizations. Our dialogue, in cooperation with other leading human rights organizations, with the international decision-makers and organizations contributed to the articulation of clear messages from the international community that legislative attempts to silence democratic opposition to government policy are unacceptable and that Israel must allow its citizens to exercise their democratic rights to freedom of speech and association.

These messages came from the EU, the US and France, to name a few. Grave concern for Israeli democracy was expressed by actors within the international community, and many expressed their hopes that Israeli civil society organizations continue to operate freely. In addition, B’Tselem addressed the NGO Law in the context of the global phenomenon of the shrinking space for civil society in several International forums, including a EuroMed Rights Seminar; an Oxfam advocacy seminar in the UK; a EuroMed Rights Working Group meeting; and a FIDH global conference in South Africa.

B’Tselem’s executive director and spokeswoman appeared frequently in the Israeli and international media, including radio programs and prime time-news panels and interviews. B’Tselem countered the perception that the issue at stake is transparency. B’Tselem argued the real intent of the law is to silence opposition to the government policy of indefinite occupation. B’Tselem delivered clear and consistent arguments, that the longest ongoing occupation in modern history is not an internal matter but an international issue, that opposition to the occupation is a legitimate Israeli agenda that Israelis have every right to advance, and that we will continue to fight until the occupation ends.

In addition to the major media work in Israel and internationally, B’Tselem put a special emphasis in 2016 on strategic work with the Israeli public. B’Tselem conducted a public opinion survey with 700 adult Israelis (500 Jews/interviews in Hebrew; 200 Arabs/ interviews in Arabic) assessing the Israeli public’s attitude towards the occupation and human rights. The strategic analysis of the quantitative research was done by expert researcher Dr. Dahlia Scheindlin. It was leveraged by B’Tselem for focused outreach and the formulation of B’Tselem’s campaign on 50 years of occupation, to be held in 2017.

During 2016, B’Tselem piloted a series of over a dozen lectures for Israeli high school and university students and for students in pre-army academies. Young people in Israel gain little to no knowledge about the occupation from the formal education system, because it is labelled as a “political issue”. Therefore, these activities targeted audiences who may disagree with B’Tselem’s messages, but are potentially open to looking deeper into their political ideas and their behavior as soldiers could be influenced.

Paradoxically, while hostility from the mainstream grew, it emboldened B’Tselem’s target audiences: the number of small donations to B’Tselem from individuals, in Israel and abroad, grew dramatically over the last year in comparison with the previous years. For B’Tselem, this encouragement and show of support is vital.
Thank you

This was a challenging year for B’Tselem. On January 10 2016, B’Tselem’s office completely burned down. Great resources and will power were invested in continuing our effective work in the aftermath. Thanks to B’Tselem’s amazingly resilient and dedicated staff, working away from a burnt office, documents and equipment, and thanks to the generous support of our colleagues and donors, we were able to succeed. We are therefore especially proud to conclude this report which shows 2016 to be an exceptionally industrious year.

B’Tselem extends its gratitude to the tens of thousands of individuals, foundations, NGOs, CSOs, UN agencies, journalists, artists, students, activists, ministers, rabbis, and European governments who support our work, both in spirit and in funding, whether small or large. Thank you for supporting us. Your backing gives us pride in our work, confidence in our shared values and strength in our efforts to challenge the occupation until it ends. Together, determined, we will bring forth a better future.

2nd Jewish Cemetery Vandalized; But Those Shedding Tears Seem to have Short Memories



Another Jewish cemetery has been vandalized. According to news reports, some 75-100 headstones were knocked over at the Mount Carmel cemetery in Philadelphia sometime either Saturday night or early Sunday morning.

It is the second vandalization of a Jewish cemetery in a week. The previous one took place at the Chesed Shel Emeth Cemetery, near St. Louis, an incident I reported on in a post several days ago.

“We are horrified by the desecration at Mount Carmel Cemetery,” said Nancy K. Baron-Baer, a regional director for the ADL, in commenting on the latest attack.

Other Jews seem to be equally horrified. The Anne Frank Center, headquartered in New York with an additional office just opened in Los Angeles, issued a statement similarly impassioned–if not more so.

“WE ARE SICKENED, SICKENED, SICKENED,” read read the group’s rather unrestrained outpouring posted on Twitter. “More Jewish gravestones were found vandalized today, this time in Philadelphia.”

Jewish graves in Philadelphia now vandalized. Stop this incubator of and other hate. WE BEG YOU @POTUS @realDonaldTrump

In its mission statement, the Anne Frank Center “calls out prejudice, counters discrimination and advocates for the kinder and fairer world of which Anne Frank dreamed.”

And as for the ADL,  so horrified and sickened are its officials by recent events they have even put up a $10,000 reward for information leading to the arrest and conviction of the vandals.

“This act is cowardly and unconscionable, and is all the more despicable coming on the heels of a similar vandalism at another Jewish cemetery in St. Louis last week,” said Baron-Baer. “We urge anyone with information on this crime to report it immediately to the Philadelphia Police Department at 215-686-TIPS.”

“I’m so upset,” said Millard Braunstein, who went to the cemetery Monday morning and discovered his mother’s headstone is one of those that had been knocked down.”This is such a terrible thing.”

“It’s just very disheartening that such a thing would take place,” said Aaron Mallin, another man with a relative buried in the cemetery.

And a Philadelphia rabbi who has also visited the cemetery and seen the damaged grave sites seems particularly heavy of heart.

“After you start walking from row to row it quickly moves from a random act of vandalism to something with larger intentions and a systematic approach to things,” said Shawn Zevit, the rabbi at the Mishkan Shalom synagogue.

While desecration of a cemetery is a despicable act, one wonders if any of these people bothered to voice their concerns over the desecration and paving under of a Muslim cemetery in Jerusalem. And if Zevit is concerned about the “systematic approach” taken by the vandals in Philadelphia (who damaged a mere 100 graves) he should stop and reflect that it doesn’t even begin to hold a candle to the “systematic approach” taken by the Israelis at the Mamilla Cemetery. Here is a bit from Wikipedia:

Mamilla Cemetery is a historic Muslim cemetery located just to the west of the walls of the Old City of Jerusalem, Israel.[1][2]The cemetery, at the center of which lies the Mamilla Pool, contains the remains of figures from the early Islamic period,[3]several Sufi shrines and Mamluk-era tombs.[1] The cemetery grounds also contain the bodies of thousands of Christians killed in the pre-Islamic era, as well as several tombs from the time of the Crusades.

Its identity as an Islamic cemetery is noted by Arab and Persian writers as early as the 11th century.[4] It was used as a burial site up until 1927 when the Supreme Muslim Council decided to preserve it as a historic site.[1]

Following the 1948 Arab–Israeli War, the cemetery and other waqfproperties in West Jerusalem fell under the control of Israeligovernmental bodies.[5] A number of buildings, a road and other public facilities, such as a park, a parking lot and public lavatories have since been constructed on the cemetery grounds, destroying grave markers and tombs. A plan to build a Museum of Tolerance on part of the cemetery grounds, announced in 2004, aroused much controversy and faced several stop work orders before being given final approval in July 2011.

The “Musem of Tolerance” mentioned by Wikipedia is a facility the Simon Wiesenthal Center is seeking to build in Jerusalem as a companion to its museum of the same name in Los Angeles. Ironically the Simon Wiesenthal Center is among those now expressing concern over the vandalization of Jewish cemeteries in the US.

“Attacking a cemetery, especially one that is all-Jewish, all-Catholic, or whatever it is, is basically an attack on the culture, the identity of the people that cemetery represents,” Aaron Brietbart, a Simon Wiesenthal researcher, told the Washington Post following the attack on the Jewish cemetery in Missouri.

Compare Brietbart’s remarks to those of another Simon Wiesenthal official, Rabbi Marvin Hier, who insisted to the BBC in 2008 that construction of the Museum of Tolerance–on top of the Mamilla Cemetery–was an appropriate use of “derelict land.”

“Jerusalem is a city built on top of thousands of bones – Jewish and Muslim,” Hier said. “If we declared the whole of Jerusalem one huge cemetery, we’d never be able to build anything.”

The Museum of Tolerance seems to be rather aptly named–since what we are being ordered to show tolerance for in large part is the Simon Wiesenthal Center’s hypocrisy.

You’ll also note–in the tweet above–that the Anne Frank Center demands President Trump “deliver a prime-time nationally televised speech, live from the Oval Office, on how you intend to combat not only #Antisemitism and #Islamophobia and other rising forms of hate.”

All well and good perhaps, but why doesn’t the Anne Frank Center seem concerned about the Islamophobia running rampant in the state of Israel? Surely apartheid, walls, occupation, home demolitions, and cemetery desecrations are not part of the “kinder and fairer world of which Anne Frank dreamed.”

Perhaps instead of delivering a live speech from the Oval Office on anti-Semitism or Islamophobia, Trump should call his advisors together to develop a national strategy for dealing with the Jewish inability to self-reflect.

And finally, one other point before closing: the fact that Muslims in America have raised money to help pay for damage done by vandals at Jewish cemeteries is, in light of attacks upon the Mamilla Cemetery in Jerusalem, ironic to say the least. After the destruction at the cemetery in Missouri, US Muslims rallied with a very successful crowdfunding campaign. Now it seems they are doing it again. Here is what is being reported by CNN:

Once again, dozens of Jewish headstones have been vandalized, stoking fears of heightened anti-Semitism. And once again, members of the Muslim community are rallying to help.

The latest spate of destruction came over the weekend at the Mount Carmel Cemetery in Philadelphia, where 75 to 100 tombstones were toppled over. A week earlier, at least 170 headstones were damaged at a Jewish cemetery in St. Louis.

Muslim activist Tarek El-Messidi, who had started a fund-raising campaign to help clean up the St. Louis cemetery, sprung to action again after the Philadelphia attack.

“I want to ask all Muslims to reach out to your Jewish brothers and sisters and stand together against this bigotry,” he wrote on Facebook.

“Last week, our Muslim community raised money for the vandalized Jewish Cemetery in St Louis. Since we raised well above the goal, we can now use extra funds to help here in Philadelphia.”

As of Tuesday morning, the campaign had raised $138,000 — nearly seven times the original goal of $20,000.

El-Messidi said he immediately visited the Philadelphia Jewish cemetery and offered his support after hearing the news. After all, Muslims can relate to the feeling of racial intolerance.

And here is a little more from the Wikipedia article on Mamilla Cemetery:

At the time of Israel’s assertion of control over West Jerusalem in 1948, the cemetery, which contained thousands of grave markers, came under the administration of the Israeli Custodian of Absentee Property and the Muslim Affairs Department of Israel’s Ministry of Religious Affairs.[1][5][28] By the end of the 1967 war that resulted in the Israeli occupation of East Jerusalem, only a handful of broken grave markers remained standing.[1] A large part of the cemetery was bulldozed and converted into a parking lot in 1964 and a public lavatory was also built on the cemetery grounds.[19][29][30]

In the 1950s, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, sensitive to how the treatment of waqf properties would be viewed internationally, criticized government policy towards the cemetery.[28] A ministry representative described the vandalism to tombstones, including their use by the guard appointed by the Religious Ministry to build a henhouse beside his shelter in the cemetery, and the destruction of ancient tombs by bulldozers cleaning the Mamilla Pool.[28] Noting the site constituted waqf property and lay within sight of the American Consulate, the ministry said it viewed the situation, which included plans for new roads and the parceling out of portions to private landowners as compensation for other properties confiscated by the state, with deep regret.[28]

Israeli authorities bulldozed several tombs in the cemetery, including some of those identified as Frankish by Clermont-Ganneau, to establish Mamilla Park (or Independence Park) in 1955.[22] Two of the largest and finest tombs survived, though the lid of one was overturned when it moved from its original spot.[22] The other is the Mamluk era funerary chapel known as al-Kebekiyeh (or Zawiya Kubakiyya), now located in the eastern end of Independence Park.[22][23]

Besides Independence Park, other parts of downtown Jerusalem erected on the cemetery grounds include the Experimental School, Agron Street, Beit Agron, and Kikar Hahatulot (Cats’ Square), among others.[18] Government buildings on the cemetery grounds include the main headquarters of the Israeli Ministry of Trade and Industry,[1] and the Customs Department building, which is said to be located on what was once the site of the chapel dedicated to St. Mamilla.[31]

In 1992, the Custodian of Absentee Property sold the cemetery grounds to the Jerusalem Municipality, a sale the Mufti of Jerusalem, Ikrema Sabri, said they had no right to make.[32] The Israeli Electricity Company destroyed more tombs on 15 January 2005 in order to lay some cables.[1]

A major protest against attacks upon the cemetery took place in Jerusalem in 2008. Here is what the BBC reported:

Earlier this week hundreds of Muslims – young and old – marched through the centre of Jerusalem towards the city’s Mamilla cemetery.

Police helicopters flew overhead and security was tight. The focus of the march, and of increasing Muslim anger, was the Israeli Supreme Court decision to sanction a controversial new building on part of the Muslim cemetery.

And finally a bit more from Wikipedia:

On 9 August 2010, 300 Muslim gravestones in the cemetery were bulldozed by the Israel Lands Administration (ILA) in an area US Jewish human rights activists said was very close to the planned site for the Museum of Tolerance.[41][42] A reporter from Agence France Presse witnessed the destruction of 200 graves until the work was briefly suspended while the court heard a stop work petition it rejected, allowing demolitions to continue that same day.[41] The judge later issued an order prohibiting harm to ancient graves and mandating that the ILA coordinate work with the Israel Antiquities Authority and representatives of the Islamic Movement.[42]

The Jerusalem city council issued its first official response in a written statement on 12 August, saying that, “The municipality and the (Israel Lands) Authority destroyed around 300 dummy gravestones which were set up illegally in Independence Park on public land.” It said these “fake” gravestones were not erected over any human remains and were placed in the park in an effort to “illegally take over state land.”[41]

Mahmud Abu Atta, a spokesman for the Al-Aqsa Foundation, denied the city council’s claim that new tombs were added illegally. He said that between 500 and 600 tombs had been renovated in total “with the municipality’s agreement,” that “some of the tombs had to be totally rebuilt,” but that “all the tombs that we built or renovated contain bodies.”[41]

Twenty graves were completely destroyed or had their tombstones removed by vandals in January 2011.[43] On the night of 25–26 June 2011, about 100 gravestones in an intact part of the cemetery were destroyed by Israeli bulldozers.[19][44] Footage filmed by local media and activists appeared on Al Arabiya and Al Jazeera and showed the bulldozers pulling out quickly after realizing they were being filmed; Israeli officials made no comment on the incident.[45]

Later that same year, fifteen gravestones in the cemetery were spray painted red with racist slogans reading “Death to the Arabs”, as well as “price tag” and “Givat Asaf“, the name of an Israeli outpost slated for demolition.


The Mamilla graveyard (shown in the background) as it appeared in 1948

Though the statements from the Anne Frank Center and some of the other Jews quoted in this article are rather amazing, perhaps the Academy Award for hypocrisy goes to an Israeli official by the name of Emmanuel Nahshon. A spokesperson for the Israeli Foreign Ministry, Nahshon tweeted the following in response to the attack on the cemetery in Philadelphia:

Jewish cemetery desecration is shocking and a source of worry . Full confidence authorities catch and punish culprits .

«‘Israel’ is Weak» Sign Concerns Ynet

Local Editor

It’s not only Hezbollah missiles that threaten “Israel”, a poster on the borders with Occupied Palestine might raise concerns all along the Zionist entity.

Hezbollah sign on the border with Occupied Palestine

In this context, “Israeli” Ynet daily chose to shed light on the defiant sign recently placed on the borders with Occupied Palestine over the weekend under the title: “weaker than a spider web”.

According to the daily, “Israeli” settlers noticed the sign as they left for work on Sunday. “We are familiar with their threats to invade the Galilee,” one said.

The sign also had the words “masters of victory”.

Ynet further said: “Meanwhile, Hezbollah continues to monitor the army’s activities in Lebanon. On the organization’s military PR page, they uploaded photos documenting “Israeli” soldiers with a bulldozer yanking out concrete obstacles.”

“They erected some kind of electric gate in the area, leading to the arrival of UNIFIL inspectors stationed in southern Lebanon,” it added, noting that “later in the day, Hezbollah posted a collection of other pictures of Lebanese soldiers repositioning the concrete barriers in an act of defiance against the “Israeli” army…”

Source: Ynet, Edited by website team

28-02-2017 | 11:31


Syria towards the resolving سورية إلى الحسم

 Syria towards the resolving 

فبراير 28, 2017

Written by Nasser Kandil,

Syria has endured a lot of the pressure of its people and their boredom of the cruelty of going on into political process that will end with the participation of hired killers in a government that rules the country, establishes a new constitution, participates in the elections, and gets number of seats by the force of money, media, and the external support, so that qualifies it to participate in a government of a national unity and reconciliation after the elections. That was because the Syrian state is keen to abide by the credibility of its vision to the war on Syria as a war that must be confined with the terrorist formations on one hand, and as an external war that used Syrian pleas  on the other hand, but when the circumstances of its end become mature due to the despair  of the abroad from achieving its goals, then it is not possible to stop the war without granting this abroad which most of it are superpowers led by America what can face -saving and what can facilitate the retreat behind saying that the Syrian embassies were closed and the sanctions on Syria were imposed in order to support a local opposition, but as long as the reconciliation has been settled with this opposition and there was a Syrian  unified government, so we will deal with it and we will accept what is accepted by the Syrians after the elections.

It was noticeable in the positive dealing of the Syrian state with the political initiatives, which are led by Russia “the allied country” which stands with Syria with its full force, without hesitation and has endured intense pressures but has not changed what is worthy from Syria according to what is represented by the political process as an importance in making its role at the international level. So in many times the Syrian state was responding to the Russian endeavors of announcing a truce or to start a dialogue, although Syria saw that it is in vain but it trusts that the Russian allies will conclude that through the experience. This has happened a year ago with the endeavors of the truce, and when it gave the armed factions which fought in Aleppo with Al Nusra front an opportunity to improve its situation under the Turkish cover, and when it was driven to Astana after dismantling its relation with Al Nusra and the repositioning under the umbrella of the political solution. The Syrian state looks at these factions as the same composition of Al Nusra and ISIS, but it meets the invitations and responds to the calls leaving the matters to the realities which will say the final word.

Syria was not deceived by the Turkish repositioning, it remained looking at it with the logic of acts and the law as a foreign occupation, but it granted the Russian endeavors their opportunity to modify the Turkish performance in a conformity with the requirements of the recognition of the Syrian legitimacy, and the respect of the international law standards in the sovereign relations between the countries. Syria has done that when it sent the positive messages to what was announced by the administration of the US President Donald Trump about his intention on making the priority of the war on terrorism and building his alliances and disputes on that basis, criticizing what was announced by the previous administration  as the war on Syria, he disclosed its role in launching ISIS and bringing the fighters of Al-Qaeda organization to Syria, but the Syrian country has heard statements not deeds, it feels that the new US administration is wandering among the issues and mazes, so it is difficult to expect qualitative steps that will contribute in changing the Syrian scene.

The US reluctance and the Turkish tampering intersect with the malice of the factions, while the desire of Saudi Arabia is to keep the war ignited, while Al Nusra front emerges again as a leader of the factions. Turkey takes the position of quarrelsome and sabotage contrary to the promises and pledges, so the truce becomes fragile in more than one front, the factions follow Al Nusra supported by the Turkish Saudi coordination and maybe the Israeli. America which is in a state of confusion and chaos is preoccupied with how to reassure the ally Benjamin Netanyahu that he is not alone and that he will be supported by Washington in all the criminality and the aggression. This is the new priority of Washington.

What is going on in the northeast of Syria around Al Bab city and near the capital Damascus in Qaboun, Jobar, and Harasta, and in Daraa, in addition to what is issued as statements by the nominations of the opposition which stem from Riyadh Conference about the Dialogue Conference in Geneva, and from the armed factions about the relation with Al Nusra front show that Syria is on a date with a round of confrontation for many forthcoming months, which means that the resolving will be the choice of the Syrian country to deal with the next phase.

Translated by Lina Shehadeh,


سورية إلى الحسم

فبراير 21, 2017

ناصر قنديل

– تحمّلت الدولة السورية الكثير من ضغوط شعبها وتململه من قسوة السير بعملية سياسية ستنتهي بمشاركة قتلة مأجورين في حكومة تدير البلد وتضع دستوراً جديداً وتشارك في الانتخابات، وتحصل على عدد من المقاعد بقوة المال والإعلام والدعم الخارجي ما يخوّلها المشاركة في حكومة وحدة وطنية ومصالحة بعد الانتخابات، وذلك حرصاً من الدولة السورية على الالتزام بمصداقية نظرتها للحرب على سورية كحرب يجب حصرها بالتشكيلات الإرهابية من جهة، ومن جهة مقابلة كحرب خارجية استعملت واجهات سورية، وعندما تنضج ظروف وقفها بيأس هذا الخارج من تحقيق أهدافه، لا يمكن التطلع لوقف الحرب بغير منح هذا الخارج، وهو في غالبه دول عظمى تتقدّمها أميركا، ما يحفظ ماء الوجه ويسهّل التراجع عبر الاختباء وراء القول أُغلقت السفارات السورية وفُرضت العقوبات على سورية لدعم معارضة محلية، وطالما تمّت المصالحة مع هذه المعارضة وتشكلت حكومة سورية موحّدة فسنتعاطى معها وبعد الانتخابات نرتضي ما يقرّره السوريون.

– كان حاضراً في التعامل الإيجابي للدولة السورية مع المبادرات السياسية أن في طليعة مَن يقودها روسيا الدولة الحليفة التي وقفت مع سورية بكل قوة وبلا تردّد وتحملت ضغوطاً شديدة ولم تتغيّر، ما يستحق من سورية مبادلة روسيا ما تمثله العملية السياسية من أهمية في صناعة دورها على المستوى العالمي. ولذلك كانت الدولة السورية في مرات كثيرة تستجيب لمساعٍ روسية لإعلان هدنة أو لبدء حوار وهي لا ترى منها جدوى، وتثق بأن الحلفاء الروس سيصلون عبر التجربة للاستنتاج ذاته. وهذا ما حدث قبل عام مع مساعي الهدنة، وما حدث بطريقة أخرى في منح الفرصة للفصائل المسلحة التي قاتلت في حلب مع جبهة النصرة ليتم تبييضها تحت الجناح التركي وتؤخذ إلى أستانة وتقوم بقطع صلتها بالنصرة والتموضع تحت مظلة الحل السياسي، والدولة السورية تنظر لهذه الفصائل كجزء من العجين ذاته الذي خبزت منه النصرة وداعش، لكنها تلبي الدعوات وتستجيب للنداءات وتترك المجال للوقائع تقول الكلمة الفصل.

– لم تنخدع سورية بالتموضع التركي وبقيت تنظر إليه بمنطق الأفعال والقانون كاحتلال أجنبي، لكنها منحت المساعي الروسية فرصتها لتعديل الأداء التركي، بما ينسجم مع مقتضيات الاعتراف بالشرعية السورية واحترام معايير القانون الدولي في العلاقات السيادية بين الدول. وكذلك فعلت سورية مع إرسال الرسائل الإيجابية نحو ما أعلنته إدارة الرئيس الأميركي دونالد ترامب عن عزمه وضع الأولوية للحرب على الإرهاب، وبناء تحالفاته وخصوماته على هذا الأساس، منتقداً ما قامت به الإدارة السابقة من إعلان الحرب على سورية وفاضحاً دورها في إطلاق تنظيم داعش وجلب مقاتلي تنظيم القاعدة إلى سورية. لكن الدولة السورية سمعت أقوالاً ولم تر أفعالاً، بل تستشعر غرقاً للإدارة الأميركية الجديدة في ملفات ومتاهات ستجعل من الصعب توقع خطوات نوعية تسهم في تغيير المشهد السوري.

– التباطؤ الأميركي والعبث التركي يتقاطعان مع خبث الفصائل، ومن حلفهم رغبة السعودية ببقاء نار الحرب مشتعلة. وتتصدّر جبهة النصرة المشهد وتظهر مجدداً كقائد للفصائل، وتنتقل تركيا لموقع المشاكسة والتخريب، خلافاً للوعود والتعهّدات، فتترنّح الهدنة في أكثر من جبهة، وتصطف الفصائل وراء النصرة ومن خلفها يعود التنسيق التركي السعودي، والإسرائيلي ليس بعيداً، والأميركي في حال التشوّش والارتباك منشغل في كيف يطمئن الحليف بنيامين نتنياهو بأنه ليس وحيداً وأن واشنطن معه في كل الإجرام والعدوان، لتبدو هذه هي الأولوية الجديدة لواشنطن.

– ما يجري في شمال شرق سورية حول مدينة الباب وجوار العاصمة دمشق في القابون وجوبر وحرستا وفي درعا، وما يصدر من مواقف لمسمّيات المعارضة المنبثقة من مؤتمر الرياض حول مؤتمر الحوار في جنيف، وعن الفصائل المسلحة حول العلاقة بجبهة النصرة، يقول إن سورية على موعد مع جولة مواجهة لشهور مقبلة، ما يعني أن الحسم سيكون وصفة الدولة السورية للتعامل مع المرحلة المقبلة.

(Visited 4٬760 times, 99 visits today)
Related Videos

Trump is a caricature version of Obama ترامب نسخة كاريكاتورية لأوباما

Trump is a caricature version of Obama

فبراير 28, 2017

Written by Nasser Kandil,

It is clear that the new US President Donald Trump has changed his electoral speech which based on the call to pay attention to the US interior, to reduce the degree of the engagement in the role of the global policeman, and the interventions and the wars with the exception of the priority of the war on ISIS which its entry is Russian US cooperation, knowing that these terms and vocabularies were quoted from Trump’s speeches in the elections, into the focus on a foreign policy that based on a speech that rebuilds what his electoral speech has affected his relation with the allies, and based on the recalling back the speech of the abstention from the involvement in the settlements which are imposed by the attempt to cooperate with Russia in preparation for a global alliance against the terrorism.

The era of the Former US President Barack Obama who was accused of failure by his opponents, and who was accused of extremism by Trump, because in his opinion he made ISIS and has implicated America with the war of Syria to change the regime in it, has been characterized with the attempt to combine the two policies of pleasing the allies in the NATO and in the region especially France, Britain, Saudi Arabia, Turkey, and Israel on one hand, and the attempt to proceed in settlements during the cooperation with Moscow on the other hand, after Obama spent his first mandate and half of his second mandate in leading the allies in the west and the region to the wars of the Arab Spring specially the war of Syria, and bringing the fleets in preparation for the war, but he was forced to retreat to avoid a full confrontation which America is not ready for it, then he discovered that he did not have ready allies for the settlements which he reached to their titles with Russia, so he fell in the waiting, slowdown, and the dual language, towards the vacancy.

Trump has succeeded in making a speech that was characterized with courage in running the settlements which Obama has hesitated in their running, since they are the only place in which the US President can test his bravery, because the field of escalation and wars is determined with the inability, this was before the Russians have positioned in the region and before the victories of Aleppo, so how after them. After the arrival of Trump to presidency he faced the complexities which prevent him from going on in the US political, diplomatic, legislative, and military policy towards qualitative step of change that is represented by the alliance with Russia. Trump has involved in wide confrontations in the US interior through improvised steps, speeches, and random positions that based on the racism and arrogance, that integrated with the abstention of the US institution, so he submitted quickly and was the resignation of his National Security Advisor Michel Flynn on the basis of a phone call with the Russian ambassador in Washington as an expression of that submission.

Trump who regressed from the choice of settlements through arrogant insolent speech inherits a president who has experienced all the opportunities to test the power, the pressures, and the sanctions, he has imposed exhausted sanctions on Russia, paved the way for the war of Ukraine, has brought the fleets to the Mediterranean Sea, moreover he has brought Al-Qaeda and sent ISIS, and has tried till the last moment through the sanctions and the negotiation to subdue Iran. He has left only two choices for the one who will come after him, the first choice is the further investment on ISIS and Al Nusra publicly and making the war on Syria prior to the war on terrorism, and the escalation against Russia on that basis. This choice has been represented by Hillary Clinton, while the second choice is the involvement with Russia and the cooperation and having an understanding with it on making the settlements in preparation for the participation in the war on Al Nusra and ISIS, this includes openness to the Syrian country. These are the titles foreshadowed by Trump.

Trump retreated in front of the abstention of the US intelligence, its military personnel, diplomats, and those who work in media, they are the elites which fought Trump to prevent his arrival, and this means that his fall is the inevitable exit from the international chaos not the fall of the choice of settlements. The choice of escalation for which Clinton has aspired and which was represented by her means Trump’s loss of his supporters without gaining his opponents, it is a choice that is determined with failure and with the high cost in the light of the direct Russian engagement in Syria and the strict Iranian position towards her.

Trump turns into a caricature version of Obama through the inability to take decision and the falling into stalemate with the difference that Trump has filled the vacancy with screaming, so his stage is characterized with some of the black comedy.

Translated by Lina Shehadeh,

ترامب نسخة كاريكاتورية لأوباما

فبراير 23, 2017

ناصر قنديل

– من الواضح أنّ الرئيس الأميركي الجديد دونالد ترامب قد انقلب على خطابه الانتخابي الذي قام على الدعوة للاهتمام بأميركا من الداخل وتخفيض درجة الانخراط بدور الشرطي العالمي، والتدخلات والحروب، باستثناء أولوية الحرب على داعش، ومدخلها تعاون روسي أميركي. وهذه مصطلحات ومفردات مقتبسة من خطابات ترامب في الانتخابات، إلى التركيز على سياسة خارجية تُبنَى على خطاب ترميم ما خرّبه الخطاب الانتخابي مع الحلفاء وتستعيد خطاب الممانعة في الانخراط بالتسويات التي يُمليها التوجّه للتعاون مع روسيا تمهيداً لحلف عالمي ضد الإرهاب.

– اتسمت مرحلة الرئيس الأميركي السابق باراك أوباما المتّهم بالتخاذل من خصومه، والمتّهم بالتطرّف من ترامب. فهو برأيه مَن صنع داعش ومَن ورّط أميركا بحرب سورية لتغيير نظام الحكم فيها، بمحاولة جمع سياسيتي إرضاء الحلفاء في الأطلسي وفي المنطقة، خصوصاً فرنسا وبريطانيا والسعودية وتركيا و»إسرائيل» من جهة، ومحاولة السير بالتسويات في طريق التعاون مع موسكو من جهة أخرى، بعدما أمضى أوباما ولايته الأولى ونصف ولايته الثانية في قيادة الحلفاء في الغرب والمنطقة لحروب الربيع العربي، خصوصاً حرب سورية وصولا لجلب الأساطيل تمهيداً للحرب، واضطر للتراجع تجنّباً لمواجهة شاملة ليست أميركا جاهزة لها، ليكتشف أن التسويات التي توصل لعناوينها مع روسيا ليس لديه حلفاء جاهزون لها، فوقع بالانتظار والتباطؤ واللغة المزدوجة، وصولاً للفراغ.

– صعد ترامب على كتف خطاب يعِد بالشجاعة في خوض غمار التسويات التي تردّد أوباما في خوضها، باعتبارها المكان الوحيد الذي يُتاح فيه للرئيس الأميركي أن يختبر شجاعته. فميدان التصعيد والحروب مسقوف بالعجز، قبل أن يكون الروس قد تموضعوا في المنطقة، وقبل انتصارات حلب، فكيف بعدهما، وبعد وصول ترامب ظهر أمامه حجم التعقيدات التي تحول دون السير بالآلة الأميركية السياسية والدبلوماسية والتشريعية والعسكرية نحو خطوة نوعية من التغيير تتمثل بالانتقال للتحالف مع روسيا، وتورّط ترامب في مواجهات واسعة في الداخل الأميركي وبخطوات مرتجلة وخطابات ومواقف عشوائية تتأسس على العنصرية والغطرسة، تكاملت مع ممانعة المؤسسة الأميركية فرضخ سريعاً وكانت استقالة مستشاره للأمن القومي مايكل فلين بناء على اتصال أجراه بالسفير الروسي في واشنطن تعبيراً عن هذا الرضوخ.

– ترامب المنكفئ عن خيار التسويات بخطاب متعالٍ ومتغطرس، يرث رئيساً لم تبقَ فرصة لاختبار القوة والضغوط والعقوبات لم يختبرها، فهو مَن ضيّق خناق العقوبات على روسيا ومَن فتح حرب أوكرانيا ومَن جلب الأساطيل إلى المتوسط ومَن جلب القاعدة وأرسل داعش، ومَن خاص حتى اللحظة الأخيرة من العقوبات والتفاوض محاولات تركيع إيران، وأبقى الباب مفتوحاً من بعده لخيارين لا ثالث لهما: الأول هو الذهاب لمزيد من الاستثمار على داعش والنصرة علناً، وجعل الحرب على سورية أسبقية للحرب على الإرهاب، والتصعيد بوجه روسيا على هذا الأساس. وهذا الخيار مثّلته هيلاري كلينتون أو الذهاب لخيار الانخراط مع روسيا والتعاون والتفاهم معها على صناعة التسويات تمهيداً للتشارك في الحرب على النصرة وداعش، وما يتضمّنه ذلك من انفتاح على الدولة السورية. وهذه هي العناوين التي بشر بها ترامب.

– تراجع ترامب أمام ممانعة مخابرات أميركا وعسكرييها ودبلوماسييها وإعلامييها. وهي النخب التي قاتلت ترامب لمنع وصوله، يعني سقوطه. وليس سقوط خيار التسويات مخرجاً حتمياً من الفوضى الدولية. فخيار السير بالتصعيد الذي كانت تبتغيه كلينتون وتمثّله بأصالة، يعني خسارة ترامب لمؤيّديه من دون كسب خصومه، وهو خيار مسقوف بالفشل وبكلفته العالية في ظل الانخراط الروسي المباشر في سورية، والموقف الإيراني الصلب تجاهها.

– يتحوّل ترامب لنسخة كاريكاتورية عن أوباما، بالعجز عن أخذ القرار والوقوع في الجمود، مع فارق ملء ترامب للفراغ بالصراخ، ما يمنح مرحلته بعضاً من الكوميديا السوداء.

(Visited 1٬361 times, 1٬361 visits today)
%d bloggers like this: