Israel’s Protests Ignore Palestine’s Quest for Freedom and Justice

April 10, 2023

– Iqbal Jassat is an Executive Member of the South Africa-based Media Review Network. He contributed this article to The Palestine Chronicle. Visit: www.mediareviewnet.com

By Iqbal Jassat

‘Unchartered territory’ is how many mainstream Western media outlets have described the unprecedented political crisis that’s engulfed Benjamin Netanyahu’s rabid right-wing regime.

Overnight the protest movement that’s been brewing for weeks in opposition to his “judicial reforms”, brought the self-proclaimed Jewish state to its knees.

The escalation in protests which shut down the main airport, harbor, universities, businesses, shopping malls, and some ministries, has come as a rude shock to most of the settler-colonial apartheid regime’s allies and hard-core apologists.

The intensity of the crisis saw senior military officials including Yoav Gallant, the Defense Minister take a public stand against plans for the controversial judicial overhaul. Firing him added fuel to a raging fire.

“We’ve never been closer to falling apart. Our national security is at risk, our economy is crumbling, our foreign relations are at their lowest point ever, and we don’t know what to say to our children about their future in this country. We have been taken hostage by a bunch of extremists with no brakes and no boundaries,” is how former PM Yair Lapid described the crisis.

The “shock and awe” of America’s client-state falling apart, in whom the US has invested billions in arms and funds is reflected in back-to-back media coverage.

The Western narrative that internecine civil strife only happens in Syria, Yemen, and Libya – not in Israel, patronized as the “only democracy” in the Middle East, has been exposed as a racist construct.

The reality however is that Zionism as the political underpinning and ideological foundation which led to the dispossession of indigenous Palestinians to pave the way for the creation of Israel has failed.

The irony is that most, if not all, the formations who are at each other’s throats – from protesters to their opponents in the streets and in government – profess to be zionists.

The insults thus hurled at each other such as “anarchists” speaks to the huge divide between racists right-wing settlers and the so-called “left”.

Cynics argue that those perceived to be leftist opponents of the regime are in effect embedded in the status quo. They have yet to transcend their pro-democracy stance by acknowledging that the democratic values preserved for one ethnic group only is no democracy.

A cursory glance at South Africa’s apartheid-era “democracy” explains what Israeli “democracy” implies.

While America’s response to the protests has been largely muted, indications are that the Biden administration has been looking on with alarm. Notwithstanding the billions of dollars it provides in “aid”, the US lacks leverage for fear of treading on the toes of powerful pro-Zionist lobbies.

Having been out-boxed by China’s bold initiative to pave the way for Iran and Saudi Arabia to rekindle full diplomatic and economic ties, America’s strategy alongside Israel’s has been severely impaired.

Most of the region especially those Arab states who have opted to “normalize” ties on the basis of the “Abraham Accords” would be concerned about the end result of the turmoil. Their security which they hinged to Israel’s security is on a roller coaster ride.

As America’s influence wanes so too will they have to reconfigure their “normalisation” while at the same time weighing their options which include closing ranks with Syria.

Turkey faces a similar conundrum. It cannot pretend any longer that ties with Israel guarantee “protection” while observing the impending disaster unfolding in the Jewish state.

That Palestinian people continue to be hunted down and killed by settler-militias and by the regime’s armed forces, while protesters on the streets remain oblivious of these crimes, explains why the crisis faced by Israel is mainly about Israelis against themselves.

Palestinians remain subject to harsh restrictions, military checkpoints, arbitrary arrests, home demolitions and occupation. None of their grievances have featured in the protests, thus rendering them invisible, while their precious lives are on the line.

The only recourse they have in defending their lives and properties is to resist the occupation.

By all accounts, as much as the crises facing Israel are unprecedented in scale and numbers, it remains a selfish outpouring of anger directed against Netanyahu’s subjugation of the judiciary.

Though he has pushed the pause button, Netanyahu has already pushed through part of the bill which effectively strips the court of the power to declare a prime minister (himself) unfit for office. Though he denies any wrongdoing, it is known that Netanyahu is determined to push the “reforms” through due to his own ongoing corruption trial where he faces charges of fraud, bribery, and breach of trust.

Though Israel’s image has been severely damaged by its own racist right-wing extremists, and its macho power weakened at the same time, the core of Palestine’s freedom struggle to rid itself of the occupation has not altered.

Following Killing of Two Jewish Settlers in Jordan Valley, a Palestinian Attack Targets Tel Aviv

April 7, 2023

One was killed and five others were wounded in a shooting and car-ramming attack near the Tel Aviv beach. (Photo: via QNN)

By Palestine Chronicle Staff

One was killed and five others were wounded in a shooting and car-ramming attack near the Tel Aviv beach on Friday.

The attacker, believed to be a Palestinian named Yousef Abu Jaber, is reportedly in a serious condition. It is not clear, however, if Abu Jaber is responsible for both attacks, as news emerging from Israeli media is conflicting.

According to Israeli Channel 14, a gunman opened fire in Tel Aviv killing one and injuring two others. In a separate operation, a car-ramming attack led to the wounding of other Israelis.

Following the latest operations, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu instructed Israeli police to enlist all reserve units in the border guards and to recruit additional forces to confront what he called the wave of terrorism.

The Israeli newspaper Yedioth Ahronoth said that the commander of the border guards has already summoned four additional units, to be added to the current six units in operation.

Earlier in the day, Israel said that two settlers were killed and a third was seriously wounded in an attack in the Hamra area, east of the town of Tubas, in the Jordan Valley (northwest of the occupied West Bank).

These events followed a very intense day that saw the firing of rockets from both Gaza and South Lebanon towards Israel. Consequently, the Israeli military bombed many targets in Gaza and Lebanon.

Palestinian Resistance groups say that firing rockets was a retaliation to the Israeli raids against Al-Aqsa Mosque starting on Wednesday, leading to the wounding of many Palestinians and the arrest of hundreds.

Some analysts in both Israel and Palestine say that the Israeli violence in Jerusalem was intended to create a distraction from Netanyahu’s biggest political crisis in years, where hundreds of thousands of Israelis have been protesting measures taken by Israel’s rightwing government coalition.

(The Palestine Chronicle)

Israel Still Pursues its Old Policy

INTERNATIONALIST 360° 

Viktor Mikhin

Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is in his third term, and he has yet to get an invitation to visit Washington. Despite the fact that there are numerous subjects for discussion. Consider, for example, how strongly everyone around the world, including Americans, condemned the far-right Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich’s call for the Palestinian town of Huwara to be “wiped out.”  Smotrich, the head of Netanyahu’s hardline coalition’s pro-settler party, made harsh public comments amid a succession of deadly punitive operations against Palestinians and Israeli settler violence in the occupied West Bank. The White House and Joe Biden “got nervous” over other similarly harsh statements made by Israeli ministers in light of the complex situation that is currently playing out not only in Israel but also throughout the Middle East. And not at all in favor of the USA.

According to World Israel News, if Israeli officials had made the same claims in private, Netanyahu would already be meeting with Biden in the Oval Office. But Joe Biden doesn’t want to endanger his campaign for a second term as president as the presidential election draws near. Yet, this year, three to four billion dollars in military aid from American taxpayers will continue to go to Israel. This is the same military aid that Israel uses in its crimes against Palestinians.

While the White House declined to clarify whether Netanyahu would still be invited, a State Department official directed reporters to the Cabinet of Israel for information on the prime minister’s intentions for such a trip. David Makowski of the Washington Institute for Near East Policy believes that “the message the US clearly wants to send is: If you follow unwanted policies, you have no right to sit in the Oval Office.” A senior Israeli official, who wished to remain unnamed, was quoted in US media reports on the matter as stating that the US position was not unexpected given that the two sides had been at odds on a number of topics for decades. Nonetheless, the official stated that “the solid relationship between Israel and the United States has not and will not be damaged as a result of these disputes.”

Two major crises that Israel is currently experiencing are affecting Netanyahu’s cabinet. Since the beginning of the year, protesters have crowded the streets of major cities to voice their opposition to the government’s proposal to curtail the authority of the so-called Supreme Court, which detractors claim will force Israelis to live under a dictatorship. Footage from Tel Aviv, where police actively used tasers and fought with Israeli protesters, was widely circulated.

Former Israeli Prime Minister Naftali Bennet warned last month of a “civil war in Israel” and called for talks on Netanyahu’s amendments. “There may be a settlement on judicial amendments,” Bennett said. “There are things that need to be fixed and changed, but we shouldn’t go from one extreme to the other.” At the same time, Bennett added that “the majority wants adjustments, not system changes,” warning against a civil war “over nothing.”

Former Attorney General Avichai Mandelblit believes the current security crisis has only just begun, and he predicts “bloodshed.” According to Israeli media, Mandelblit said, “We are only at the beginning of the conflict. The situation will continue to worsen, and there will be bloodshed inside Israel.”

The Knesset (Israeli parliament) is trying to overthrow the so-called judicial system. On first reading, the law received 63 votes in favor, which is more than the quorum’s required threshold. The goal of the action is to make the Knesset stronger so that Netanyahu’s hardline alliance can maintain its majority and overturn Supreme Court rulings. Members of the Knesset will have more influence in the selection of judges as a result of Netanyahu’s actions.

Netanyahu is allegedly attempting to utilize the reforms to remove a lot of accusations against himself that are related to 2019 according to the protest organizers. Fraud, bribery, and breach of trust are among the charges and scandals. According to Israeli media, hundreds of thousands of settlers protested in Tel Aviv and other settlements in the occupied areas, including Jerusalem, as well as outside President Isaac Herzog’s residence. The president urged Netanyahu’s cabinet to halt reforms and speak with the opposition in order to reach a consensus. Despite not ruling out conversation, the ruling cabinet refused to defer or postpone the reform vote. The president of Israel warned that the situation was going to erupt.

Netanyahu’s political opponents slammed the moves as an attempt to “abolish the courts.” The suggested measures, according to Israeli opposition leader Yair Lapid, are an attempt by the prime minister to avert continuous corruption cases. “Just because they have a majority in parliament does not mean… that they can demolish the Supreme Court simply because the prime minister has been indicted,” Lapid stated.

The so-called reforms open the path for additional issues that the regime will be concerned about. Analysts worry that Netanyahu’s policies will have a long-term negative impact on Israel’s economic growth and the living standards of Israeli settlers. Although the judicial reform has not yet taken effect, it has already had an impact on the Israeli shekel. The planned reforms, in the opinion of businesspeople and economists, would jeopardize Israel’s investment interests in the occupied territories. According to Israeli President Isaac Herzog, Netanyahu’s obsession with supposed reforms has brought the government to the “depths of a serious crisis,” with the threat of civil war looming.

The Supreme Court justified all crimes and atrocities committed against Palestinians, so this has nothing to do with them. This includes the ongoing expansion of settlements, which are illegal under international law yet are approved by the US.

According to US Secretary of State Antony Blinken, who also expressed “grave concern” about the proposal, the US supposedly opposes allowing Israel to establish Jewish settlement outposts in the occupied West Bank. This action came less than two weeks after he expressed the opposition of the United States to such measures during his visit to the region. According to the Tehran Times, it is probable that the Secretary of State covertly supported this type of conduct, despite his words of “condemnation” by Washington. As usual, there is a game going on here that is costing the Palestinians dearly.

Simultaneously, the United States continues to utilize its veto power in the UN Security Council to allow illegal Israeli settlements to thrive. Other than public words to calm the international community, Blinken has exhibited no significant resistance to settlement expansion. The hypocrisy of the Secretary of State is astounding: “We strongly oppose such unilateral measures, which exacerbate tensions and undermine the prospects for a negotiated two-state solution.” Ned Price, the spokesman for the US State Department, went even further in his euphemisms, asserting that Blinken had made it clear during his visit to the occupied territories that he opposed the legalization of settlements.

The increase of violence in the occupied West Bank is Israel’s second crisis. Punitive actions have intensified since young Palestinians started using armed resistance earlier this year, including numerous Israeli crimes against humanity.

Speaking before the UN Human Rights Council in Geneva, UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Volker Türk condemned the current actions of the Israeli authorities as “an incomprehensible declaration of incitement to violence and hostility.” According to this international organization, at least 65 Palestinian adults and children have been killed by Israeli Security Forces since the beginning of the year. “Settlements in the occupied territories must be stopped soon; the situation in the Occupied Palestinian Territories is tragic. A catastrophe, first and foremost, for the Palestinian people,” both Türk and the entire world agree.

Israeli Overhaul: It’s Not About a Legislation But Rather a Society Doomed to Infighting

 March 29, 2023

Mass protests swept across the Zionist entity over the Israeli governmnet’s plan to overhaul the justice system.

Yahya Dbouk*

Translated by Areej Fatima Husseini

The zionist entity is experiencing an unprecedented internal crisis, which has prompted Israeli President Isaac Herzog to caution that it could lead to a civil war that would leave no trace of the “Israeli state.”

The first side of the conflict is the government coalition led by Benjamin Netanyahu, which comprises the “Likud” party, religious groups from the “Haredi” movement, and so-called ultranationalist Jews. On the opposite side, there are opponents from predominantly secular (centrist and leftist) parties, as well as right-wing parties, who are at odds with Netanyahu.

Shortly after it was formed in January, the government submitted draft legislation aimed at overhauling the Israeli judicial system, to be followed by other projects, in preparation for amendments that were supposed to affect other state institutions. These draft amendments were met with significant opposition from Israel’s political community, including ex-officials, elites, and specialists, who were joined by the majority of the Hebrew media.

Therefore, those opponents staged protests in Tel Aviv and other areas in response to the government’s overhauls which they called a “coup against the system of government and democracy.”

With the date for approval of the overhaul in the “Knesset” approaching, the protests grew, as did the list of those who opposed them. They were joined by members of the “Knesset” from the “Likud,” led by the Minister of Defense Yoav Gallant, who was later dismissed due to his opposition.

What exactly are these overhauls? Do they merit all of this opposition or all of that backing in return? Is it worth sparking political and social discord as well as threatening to demolish institutions such as the army?

The amendments seek to restrict the judiciary’s powers by preventing it from invalidating laws enacted by the “Knesset.” This appears against the backdrop of the Knesset’s opposition to fundamental laws or those with constitutional standing, or legal principles that the Supreme Court has used to reject certain bills, most of which depend on human rights and freedom of speech… and others.

In addition, the changes seek to alter the process of selecting and appointing judges, particularly Supreme Court judges. This happens by changing the structure of the appointment committee, with the governing coalition having the ultimate say in the decision. Opponents argue that such a committee would be affiliated with politicians, effectively ending the judicial system’s most important fortification, independence, and non-reliance on the political establishment.

But does this plan presage civil war?

The effort to introduce, as well as the attempt to avoid, the aforementioned amendments is a manifestation of the reality of a sharp split within Israel’s “community of societies,” so to speak. The Supreme Court plays a significant role in managing the divide by balancing the public interest and societal harmony as well as preventing any component from violating the rights of the other components or forcing its will on them.

According to the opponents of the overhaul, described by them as the “coup,” restricting the judiciary’s ability to consider laws and decisions issued by the government and the “Knesset” means introducing laws into political settlements as preconditions for the joining of this or that party to a coalition, even if this harms the so-called ‘state of Israel’.

It is worth noting here that the extremists’ agenda is very broad, and if it is translated into legislation in the “Knesset” without the chance of nullification, the identity of the Zionist entity will change.

For many secular Israelis, if talks to establish a government coalition are successful, the “Haredi” religious parties will be forced to demand the passage of Talmudic-style legislation. These parties deny the rights of the Israeli majority and compel them to do or not do things based on Talmudic law, something which cannot be applied without “violating human rights.”

Similarly, agendas of fascist parties, such as “religious Zionism”, rely on harming others just because they are “others”. Such parties view the involvement of the Israeli regime in conflicts and wars for territorial gains as a supreme value, resulting in wars for which ‘Israel’ itself pays the price, and to no avail.

The two samples referred to here are just part of what would transform ‘Israel’ into a different entity, not only by abolishing the so-called ‘democracy’ and allowing a group of Israelis to impose their will on others but also by exposing ethnic and social divisions and differences. This makes handling the divide and mitigating its consequences difficult.

Given this setting, it is easy to see how a shift in the court’s and judiciary’s powers could lead to a civil conflict. This is because Israel’s dilemma is insoluble. Even if a solution to the overhaul is found – in which the amendments would be paused or totally withdrawn, any solution will not fully fix things.

Thus, if prudence, based on concerns and the growth of opposition, can halt the legislation, the issue is likely to reoccur later, possibly with greater gravity.

In a society that defies itself internally in almost everything, Nazi and radical right-wing groups, as well as followers of Talmudic laws, are growing in power, status, and number. As a result, if the combat is not taking place right now, it is expected to take place shortly.

* Yahya Dbouk is a Lebanese journalist who writes for Al-Akhbar Newspaper. This article was published on Tuesday, March 28, 2023.

Source: Al-Akhbar newspaper (translated by Al-Manar English Website)

الكيان الصهيوني بين تفاقم أزمته الداخلية وانتقالها إلى الجيش… ومأزق نتنياهو

الأربعاء 29 آذار 2023

حسن حردان

نتقلت الأزمة الداخلية العاصفة بكيان الاحتلال الصهيوني، والتي أحدثت شرخاً عميقاً سياسياً ومجتمعياً. انتقلت الى داخل الجيش «الاسرائيلي» وباتت تهدّد قدرته على مواصلة عملياته القتالية.. مما شكل حسب الكثير من المسؤولين السابقين والخبراء والمحللين الصهاينة خطراً داهماً، يهدّد وحدة وتماسك الجيش الذي طالما اعتبر الأساس الصلب الذي يرتكز اليه كيان الاحتلال في استمرار وجوده المصطنع والمؤقت، وفي مواصلة احتلاله لأرض فلسطين، والجولان السوري وأجزاء من الأراضي اللبنانية.. على انّ المؤشرات على هذا التهديد لوحدة وتماسك جيش الاحتلال تجسّدت بالوقائع التالية:

أولاً، فشل جهود رئيس الأركان في جيش الاحتلال «الاسرائيلي»، هرتسي هليفي، للحيلولة دون وصول الأزمة الى الجيش، بعد انضمام المئات من نخبة الجيش من الطيارين والضباط وجنود الاحتياط الى الاحتجاجات ورفضهم الخدمة في الجيش.

ثانياً، ظهور احتمال تمرّد جنود عاملين في الخدمة، مما قد يؤثر على مهام وعمليات جيش الاحتلال في الضفة الغربية والقدس المحتلتين.

ثالثاً، دعوة وزير الحرب يواف غالانت، وهو نائب في الكنيست عن حزب ليكود، إلى تعليق إقرار التعديلات القضائية لمدة شهر، محذراً من أنّ الاحتجاجات ضدّ التعديلات وانضمام عدد متزايد من جنود الاحتياط إلى الاحتجاجات «يؤثر على عمل القوات النظامية ويهدّد الأمن القومي»، وأكد أنه «لن يجعل ذلك يسيراً»، في إشارة إلى احتمال امتناعه عن التصويت على التصديق على مشروع القانون في الكنيست.

رابعاً، ردّ رئيس الحكومة بنيامين نتنياهو على دعوة غالانت بإقالته، مما دفع وزير الحرب السابق بيني غانتس إلى القول: «نواجه تهديداً حقيقياً ونتنياهو وضع نفسه قبل أمن إسرائيل».

هذه الوقائع والتطورات تؤشر الى عمق الأزمة التي امتدّت إلى الجيش الذي طالما كان في السابق بمنأى عن الصراعات السياسية، ويوصف بـ «جيش الشعب وحامي الكيان»، ويُقال عنه بأنه «أساس وجود الكيان»، ولهذا عندما تبلغ الأزمة حد إحداث الشرخ والتمرّد داخل الجيش فهذا إنما يدلل على حجم الخطر الذي بات يتهدّد وجود الكيان وأمنه واستقراره الداخلي، لأنّ الشرخ الحاصل في المجتمع الصهيوني بين متديّنين وعلمانيّين، وبين يهود اشكيناز غربيّين، ويهود سفرديم شرقيّين، ينعكس على المؤسسة العسكرية، وهو ما دفع قادتها الى التحذير من مخاطر استمرار الازمة على الجيش، الأـمر الذي حذر منه أيضاً العديد من الصهاينة الذين باتوا يعبّرون عن خوفهم من اندلاع حرب أهلية إذا ما واصل نتنياهو عناده ورفض التخلي عن مشروعه إدخال تعديلات على القضاء لحماية نفسه وحليفيه بن غفير وسموتيريتش من ملاحقات قضائية بتهم الفساد.

انطلاقاً من هذه المعطيات، يبدو أنّ الأزمة تسير نحو مزيد من التفاقم استنادا إلى ثلاثة عوامل:
العامل الأول، عدم وجود أيّ استعداد لدى نتنياهو وحليفيه بن غفير وسموتيريتش، على التراجع عن مشروعهم بإقرار إصلاحات قضائية، تجعلهم قادرين على التحكم بالقضاء، لا سيما المحكمة العليا، لحماية أنفسهم من الملاحقات بتهم الفساد.

العامل الثاني، ارتهان نتنياهو للتحالف مع بن غفير وسموتيريتش، لإبقاء حكومته، مما يجعله مكبّل اليدين لا يستطيع الإقدام على قبول حلول وسط مع المعارضة للخروج من الأزمة، من دون موافقة حليفيه اللذين يرفضان ايّ حلول وسطية ويصرّان على السير بالتعديلات القضائية مهما كانت التداعيات، بل ويهدّدان المعارضة باستخدام القوة لقمع الاحتجاجات… فنتنياهو يدرك انه في حال تراجع ووافق على تعليق التعديلات، فإنّ عقد الائتلاف الحكومي سوف ينفرط…

العامل الثالث، عدم قدرة نتنياهو على تصدير الأزمة الداخلية من خلال قيامه بشنّ حرب ضدّ المقاومة في لبنان، او ضدّ المقاومة في قطاع غزة، أو ضرب البرنامج النووي الإيراني، لأنّ اتخاذ مثل هذا القرار يحتاج إلى موافقة المؤسّستين الأمنية والعسكرية في كيان الاحتلال، وهو أمر لا توافق عليه هاتان المؤسستان، بسبب عدم ضمان تحقيق النصر من ناحية، والخوف من تدحرج الأمور نحو حرب واسعة تهدّد بالخطر وجود الكيان من ناحية ثانية، كما أنّ قرار شنّ الحرب يتطلب الحصول على ضوء أخضر أميركي، وهو أمر غير وارد لدى إدارة بايدن، إما لأنها لا تريد إبعاد الأنظار والانشغال بعيداً عن الحرب الأساسية ضدّ روسيا في أوكرانيا، أو بسبب المخاطر الكبيرة للحرب على النفوذ الأميركي وأمن ووجود الكيان الصهيوني..

واذا افترضنا أنّ نتنياهو مستعدّ للمغامرة وتجاوز موقف واشنطن، فإنه لا يستطيع تجاوز اعتراض المؤسّستين الأمنية والعسكرية في الكيان الصهيوني..
لكن هل يعني ذلك أنّ نتنياهو وحليفيه باتوا في طريق مسدود؟

من الواضح أنهم فعلاً أصبحوا في طريق مسدود، بسبب ما يلي:

أولا ـ اشتداد وتوسّع دائرة المعارضة للتعديلات القضائية، لتشمل إلى جانب تزايد حجم المشاركة في التظاهرات والاحتجاجات في معظم المدن، وإقفال مطار بن غوريون، والشلل الحاصل في الاقتصاد والبورصة، واحتمالات اندفاع الوضع إلى الفوضى.
ثانيا ـ مخاطر انتقال تمرّد ضباط وجنود الاحتياط، إلى داخل الوحدات النظامية في الجيش الإسرائيلي مما يهدّد بانتقال الانقسام السياسي والحزبي والمجتمعي إلى صفوف الجيش الذي يشكل حصن الكيان وحاميه…

ثالثا ـ أمام مخاطر تصاعد وتفاقم الأزمة، من المحتمل ان تنتقل الأزمة إلى داخل حكومة نتنياهو بانضمام وزراء آخرين إلى جانب وزير الحرب بالدعوة إلى تعليق إقرار التعديلات القضائية، مما قد يقود إلى انفراط عقد الائتلاف الحكومي وفقدانه الأغلبية في الكنيست إذا لم يرضخ نتنياهو وحليفاه إلى دعواتهم ويقبلوا بحلول وسطية للأزمة،

ولهذا من المرجح أن يسلك نتنياهو سبيل تأجيل إقرار التعديلات لتجنّب اتساع الأزمة واحتواء غضب المعارضة في الشارع.

هذه الأزمة العنيفة التي تعصف بكيان الاحتلال ويهدّد استمرارها وحدة وتماسك جيشه، ووجود الكيان برمّته، دفعت وزير الخارجية السابق أفيغدور ليبرمان إلى وصف نتنياهو بأنه «الخطر الاكبر على إسرائيل، أكثر من إيران وحزب الله»… فيما بات ينعت من قبل المحتجّين بالديكتاتور الذي أدخل الكيان الصهيوني في صراع داخلي حادّ أدّى إلى انقسام سياسي، وشرخ مجتمعي لم يسبق أن شهده منذ اغتصابه أرض فلسطين واعلان قيامه عام 1948…

IOF Chief: amid security threats protests must not affect military

March 27, 2023

Source: Israeli Media

By Al Mayadeen English 

Israeli Occupation Forces Chief Herzi Halevi says protests are for the public sphere and active and reserved IOF servicemen.

Israel Occupation Forces Chief Herzi Halevi speaks during his transition ceremony in Al-Quds, January 16, 2023 (AP).

Israeli Occupation Forces (IOF) chief, Herzi Halevi, claimed in an open letter addressed to active and reserve members of the IOF, claiming that “Israel has never known such days of external threats combined with an internal storm.”

Halevi urged that “this is a time for responsibility,” at a time when violent protests have become widespread and at a time when Security Minister Yoav Gallant was fired due to his opposition to the judicial reforms for reasons of alleged “national security”.

Halevi said “Our enemies must know that we are standing guard and nobody is deserting,” before adding “I am responsible that every mission given to you will be aimed at defending the security of Israel and its citizens, and will be in accordance with IDF values.”

The IOF chief proclaimed that protests are for public spheres and must interfere in military missions. Moreover, MK Yuli Edelstein, a member of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s Likud Party, voiced his support for Gallant and stated that “in view of the security situation – it is clear that this is not the time to change the defense minister.”

Netanyahu sacks Security Minister Gallant over call to halt ‘reforms’

Netanyahu’s office announced in a brief statement that the Prime Minister has decided to sack Gallant. However, the Times of “Israel” noted that “it is unclear what new position he will be given, if any.” As per Maariv, Netanyahu now has 48 hours to appoint a new security minister.

According to The Jerusalem Post, Netanyahu told Gallant that he lost his trust in him after he “went behind the government’s back” on Saturday while the occupation Prime Minister was visiting London.

Read more: High ranking Israeli air force officers to evade draft in protest

‘Israel’ Eroding From Within

Over the past month, upheaval and chaos took the Israeli occupation entity by storm. Violent clashes erupted between the opposition and police, as Israeli settlers protest against the government’s judicial reforms. Appeals for civil disobedience and riots have been met with stern warnings from both sides, as political rifts are widening and warning against the outbreak of a “civil war”.

Related Stories

Netanyahu Announces Suspension of Judicial Reform Legislation

 March 27, 2023

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu announced Monday the postponement of the judicial reform legislation to the summer amid soaring tensions between the opponents and proponents.

Netanyahu said that either way, his government would bring a reform that will “return the balance that was lost between the [government] branches,” while “safeguarding and even strengthening individual rights.”

The Zionist prime minister criticized an “extreme” minority amongst the opponents of the reforms. Refusal to deploy for reserve duty signals “the end of our country,” and those who support this, or who call for anarchy and violence, are willing to tear the “country” apart, Netanyahu said.

The Israeli prime minister added that the country was on a “dangerous path,” and that he would not allow it to descend into civil war. He thanked the pro-reform camp for attending a large rally outside the Knesset on Monday evening, and asked that they “continue acting responsibly and not deteriorate into provocations.”

For his part, Zionist President Isaac Herzog wrote  in a statement following Netanyahu’s announcement: “Stopping the legislation is the right thing. “This is the time to start an honest, serious and responsible conversation that will quickly calm [tensions] and lower the flames.”

“For the sake of our unity and for the ‘future of our children’, we need to start talking here and now,” he wrote.

Israeli Defense Minister Yoav Gallant also released a statement on Monday night in support of Netanyahu’s postponement of the judicial reform legislation.

The government will approve at its next meeting a decision to form a “National “Guard and subjugate it to “National” Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir, in exchange for Ben-Gvir’s party, Otzma Yehudit, promising not to leave the government over Netanyahu’s intention to postpone the legislation of the first judicial reform bill.

“The reform will pass,” tweeted Ben-Gvir on Monday night. “The National Guard will be established. The budget I requested for the National Security Ministry will be passed in its entirety.”

Ben-Gvir on Monday reportedly threatened to quit the government if Netanyahu decided to freeze the legislation until after the Knesset recess between April 2-30. The coalition announced last week that the first bill, that would give the coalition a majority in Israel’s Judicial Appointments Committee, would pass before the Knesset recesses.

Thousands of protesters in favor of the judicial reform gathered next to the Supreme Court in Jerusalem on Monday evening, with signs reading “leftist traitors.”

Hundreds of thousands of protesters took to the streets on Sunday and Monday in Tel Aviv, Jerusalem (Al-Quds), Haifa, and the rest of the occupied cities amid a public strike.

— HumanDilemma (@HumanDilemma_) March 27, 2023

Source: Israeli media

Netanyahu to Announce Halt to Judicial Overhaul amid Unprecedented Chaos in ‘Israel’

March 27, 2023

The coalition of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was thrown into disorder on Monday due to widespread protests that took place overnight regarding the dismissal of his war chief.

As a result, the Zionist government is now under intense strain to put an end to its controversial and unpopular proposed plan to overhaul the occupying regime’s so-called judicial system.

It was anticipated that Netanyahu would declare the suspension of the plans through a televised statement on Monday morning. However, due to the possibility of his nationalist-religious coalition falling apart, Israeli media reported that the statement had been delayed.

No new time is given for the speech, which had been expected to include an announcement of a freeze to the controversial legislation.

Israeli media reported on Sunday widespread protests, including the closure of major roads and the breaching of barriers around the house of Netanyahu in occupied Jerusalem, following his decision to dismiss the Zionist Defense Minister.

The occupation army has raised the state of alert after losing control inside the occupied territories, according to the Israeli Channel 12.

Thousands of protesters took to the streets on Sunday in Tel Aviv, Jerusalem (Al-Quds) and Haifa, after Netanyahu dismissed Defense Minister Yoav Gallant.

Video Player

While the Israeli Occupation Army Radio said that the police commissioner had directed an increase in reinforcements throughout ‘Israel’, he declared that the police would arrest anyone involved in cases of extreme violence and vandalism.

Israeli media said that protesters broke through barriers around Netanyahu’s home in Jerusalem (Al-Quds), and that police used water cannons to push them away.

At the same time, the Israeli daily, Yedioth Ahronoth, reported that officials and mayors announced that they would start a hunger strike in front of Netanyahu’s office today, Monday.

Meanwhile, thousands of protesters headed to the Knesset headquarters in Jerusalem (Al-Quds).

In Tel Aviv, huge crowds blocked the city’s main highway, and demonstrators set fires in the middle of the road, according to Reuters.

The Israeli occupation Army Radio quoted one of the leaders of the protests as saying that the road closures will continue until Netanyahu’s resignation.

For his part, the head of the Israeli Workers’ Union said that the union will announce a complete closure of the economy.

Former Prime Minister Naftali Bennett said ‘Israel’ is in the greatest danger since the 1967 war.

Moreover, a spokesman for the US National Security Council expressed serious concern about the developments in ‘Israel’ and their repercussions on the occupation army.

On the other hand, the Israeli Consul General in New York announced that he had submitted his resignation on Sunday in protest of the dismissal of the Minister of war.

“I can no longer continue to represent this government,” Consul Asaf Zamir said on Twitter.

Whereas Likud members called on the people not to accept the position of defense minister, and said, “Whoever accepts the position of defense minister brings disgrace to himself.”

Source: Israeli media (edited by Al-Manar English Website)

Related

“أحلك أمسية في تاريخ إسرائيل”.. و”الجيش” يرفع حالة التأهب

الاثنين 27 مارس 2023

المصدر: وسائل إعلام إسرائيلية

وسائل إعلام إسرائيلية تفيد بأن “جيش” الاحتلال رفع حالة التأهب، ومسؤول إسرائيلي سابق يقول إن “هذه هي أحلك أمسية في تاريخ إسرائيل”.

“الجيش” الإسرائيلي يرفع حالة التأهب بعد فقدان السيطرة داخل الأراضي المحتلة

رفع “جيش” الاحتلال الإسرائيلي حالة التأهب، مساء أمس الأحد، بعد فقدان السيطرة داخل الأراضي المحتلة، في أعقاب إقالة وزير الأمن الإسرائيلي، يوآف غالانت من منصبه على خلفية أزمة التعديلات القضائية، حسبما أفادت “القناة 12” الإسرائيلية.

وأوضحت القناة أن إعلان “الجيش” لحالة التأهب جاء بعد خروج مئات الآلاف للتظاهر ضد حكومة نتنياهو.

ونقلت وسائل إعلام إسرائيلية عن الناطق السابق باسم “الجيش” الإسرائيلي، افي بنياهو، قوله إن “هذه هي أحلك أمسية في تاريخ إسرائيل”.

وأضاف أن “نتنياهو أنهى حياته السياسية الليلة، مسموح لكم أن تكونوا حزينين وخائفين، فالديكتاتورية موجودة هنا بالفعل”.

وفي السياق ذاته، أفادت قناة “كان” الإسرائيلية بأن قائد شرطة الاحتلال المفوض، أمر بتعزيز القوات في جميع المدن، مشدداً على “اعتقال المتظاهرين فقط في حالات العنف الشديد والتخريب”.

من جانبهم، أعلن مسؤولون ورؤساء “بلديات” الاحتلال الإسرائيلي، أنهم سينفذون، اليوم الإثنين، إضراباً عن الطعام أمام مكتب رئيس حكومة الاحتلال بنيامين نتنياهو، بحسب صحيفة “يديعوت أحرنوت”.

وبحسب وسائل إعلام إسرائيلية، فقد خرج أكثر من 600 ألف متظاهراً من كريات شمونة شمالاً إلى إيلات جنوباً، فيما استدعت الشرطة المزيد من شاحنات ضخ المياه لتفريق المتظاهرين من محيط منزل نتنياهو في القدس المحتلة.

واحتشد الآلاف مقابل منزل نتنياهو في القدس المحتلة بعد إقالة وزير الأمن يوآف غالانت.

وذكر الإعلام الإسرائيلي أن مركبة إسرائيلية حاولت دهس مجموعة من المتظاهرين في شوارع “تل أبيب”.

وبالتزامن، أفاد مراسل الميادين بأن هناك محاولة دهس لمتظاهرين في عكا المحتلة.

وأضافت وسائل الإعلام ذاتها أن المتظاهرين أمام الكنيست أطلقوا هتافات تدعو إلى إسقاط حكومة نتنياهو.

وقال مسؤولون سابقون في المؤسسة الأمنية الإسرائيلية، تعليقاً على إقالة غالانت إن “خطوة كبيرة على طريق تفكيك الجيش”، مشيرين إلى أن “إسرائيل تنزف”.

يأتي ذلك في وقت أشارت وسائل الإعلام الإسرائيلية إلى أنّ “المتظاهرين وصلوا إلى مدخل بيت نتنياهو في حادث غير مسبوق خلال الاحتجاجات”.

هذا وقال ضابط كبير في شرطة الاحتلال الإسرائيلي “فقدنا السيطرة في عدة أماكن حيث تجري التظاهرات”. كما أفادت مراسلة الميادين بأنّ “التظاهرات فاجأت السلطة الإسرائيلية التي لم تكن جاهزة لمثل هذا السيناريو”. 

كذلك قالت وسائل الاعلام إنّ “نجمة داوود الحمراء أعلنت رفع حالة الاستنفار في نقاط الاحتجاج”.

من جانبه، صرح رئيس حكومة الاحتلال السابق نفتالي بينيت، بأنه هذا المساء “إسرائيل” في النقطة الأخطر على وجودها منذ حرب عام 73، داعياً نتنياهو لوقف التشريعات فوراً.

يذكر أن رئيس حكومة الاحتلال بنيامين نتنياهو أقال وزير الأمن غالانت من منصبه، أمس الأحد، على خلفية أزمة التعديلات القضائية.

وفي سياقٍ متصل، انتقد موظفون كبار في الإدارة الأميركية، قرار نتنياهو بإقالة غالانت، وقالو: “قلقون جداً من الوضع ومن إقالة غالانت”.

هذا وأفادت مراسلة الميادين أيضاً بأنّ “الكنيست” أقر “قانون درعي 2” بالقراءتين الثانية والثالثة، الذي يسمح لنتنياهو بتعيين وزراء والالتفاف على قرارات المحكمة العليا.

اقرأ أيضاً: “تمزق داخلي إسرائيلي والجيش يتفكك”.. مئات الآلاف يتظاهرون ضد حكومة نتنياهو

أهم الاخبار

Netanyahu delays announcement of latest stance on judicial reform

March 27, 2023

Source: Agencies + Al Mayadeen Net

By Al Mayadeen English 

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu postpones his press conference due to disputes within the ruling coalition amid violent protests.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu during the swearing-in ceremony for the new Israeli Knesset in Al-Quds, November 15, 2022. (Reuters).

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu could announce on Monday the suspension of judicial reforms after widespread violent protests.

Israeli media cited a source in Netanyahu’s office stating that “the prime minister intends to announce the suspension of judicial reforms.”

To this time, no statement was issued by the Israeli Prime Minister’s Office. However, Netanyahu postponed his previously scheduled press conference, while Israeli media confirmed that the postponement of the conference was due to “disputes within the ruling coalition.”

Israeli Channel 12 noted that the disputes during the ruling coalition heads’ meeting were full of “drama”, adding that “National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir warned of the collapse of the government.”

In turn, Israeli channel Kan TV reported from a source in Netanyahu’s office that Justice Minister Yarev Levin “will not remain in the Ministry of Justice.”

Moreover, Israeli media pointed out that if the Minister of Justice resigns, the situation will escalate prompting further violence among settlers which will lead to the weakening and potential collapse of the government.

Ben-Gvir claimed, “Something happened today in ‘Israel’, the votes of fighter pilots are worth more than those of Golani and the Border Guards”, further saying, “the votes of Tzahala are worth more than those of Dimona and Beersheba, and the votes of high-tech workers are worth more than manual workers.”

Ben-Gvir concluded, “it is forbidden to halt the reform of the judiciary and to be subjected to chaos.”

The Religious Zionism Party considered that “halting the legislation will mean giving in to violence, chaos, evasion of military service, and the tyranny of the minority.”

Israeli opposition leader Yair Lapid told Netanyahu that the occupation’s “military and security are in danger, we have hit bottom.” Lapid further demanded that Netanyahu “stop this madness.”

Israeli President urges immediate halt of judicial reforms

Israeli media reported last night that over 600,000 Israeli settlers took to the streets on Sunday to protest against the judicial reforms introduced by the government of Israeli occupation Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, after Netanyahu dismissed Security Minister Yoav Gallant.

Israeli President Isaac Herzog urged the government to halt the adoption of judicial reform immediately.
 
Herzog said “We have seen very difficult scenes tonight. I appeal to the Prime Minister, the members of the government, and members of the coalition … For the sake of the unity of the people of Israel, for the sake of the responsibility we are obliged to, I call on you to stop the legislative process immediately.

Read more: Resistance Axis ‘watching Israeli crisis with joy’: Israeli media

Related Stories

Algeria’s Gas vs. Rightwing Ideology: Will Italy Change Its Position on Jerusalem?

March 21, 2023

Italian PM Giorgia Meloni (L) with her Israeli counterpart Benjamin Netanyahu. (Photo: via Italian Government Presidency of the Council of Ministers)

By Romana Rubeo & Ramzy Baroud

When Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu left Tel Aviv for Rome on March 9, he was flown to Ben Gurion airport in Tel Aviv by a helicopter because anti-government protesters blocked all the roads around it.

Netanyahu’s visit was not met with much enthusiasm in Italy, either. A sit-in was organized by pro-Palestine activists in downtown Rome under the slogan, ‘Non sei il benvenuto’ – ‘You Are Not Welcome’. An Italian translator, Olga Dalia Padoa, also refused to translate his speech at a Rome synagogue, which was scheduled for March 9.

Even Noemi Di Segni, President of the Union of Italian Jewish Communities, though unsurprisingly reiterating her love and support for Israel, expressed her concern for Israeli state institutions.

Back in Tel Aviv, Netanyahu’s trip to Italy was slammed by Israeli opposition leader Yair Lapid as “a wasteful and unnecessary weekend on the country’s dime”. But Netanyahu’s trip to Italy had other goals, aside from spending a weekend in Rome or distracting from the ongoing protests in Israel.

In an interview with the Italian newspaper La Repubblica, published on March 9, the Israeli prime minister explained the lofty objectives behind his trip to Italy. “I would like to see more economic cooperation,” he said. “We have natural gas: we have plenty of it and I would like to talk about how to bring it to Italy to support its economic growth.”

In recent weeks, Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni has shuttled between several countries in search of lucrative gas contracts. Not only does Meloni want to secure her country’s need for energy following the Russia-Ukraine crisis, but she wants Rome to be a major European hub for gas imports and exports. Israel knows this, and is particularly wary that Italy’s major gas deals in Algeria on January 23 could undermine Israel’s economic and political position in Italy, as Algeria continues to serve as a bulwark of Palestinian solidarity throughout the Middle East and Africa.

Netanyahu had other issues on his mind, aside from gas. “On the strategic front, we will discuss Iran. We must prevent it from going nuclear because its missiles could reach many countries, including Europe, and no one wants to be taken hostage by a fundamentalist regime with a nuclear weapon,” Netanyahu said with the usual fear-mongering and stereotypical language pertaining to his enemies in the Middle East.

Netanyahu has two main demands from Italy: not to vote against Israel at the United Nations and, more importantly, to recognize Jerusalem as the capital of Israel. Though East Jerusalem is recognized by the international community as an occupied Palestinian city, Netanyahu wants Rome to change its position, which is consistent with international law, based on the flimsy logic of the “strong and ancient tradition between Rome and Jerusalem”.

Using the same logic, that of natural resources and arms exports in exchange for political allegiance to Israel at the UN, Netanyahu has achieved much success in normalizing ties between his country and many African nations. Now, he is applying the same modus operandi to Italy, a European power and the world’s ninth-largest economy.

Whether this strategy is an outcome of the growing subservience of Europe to Washington and Tel Aviv, or Netanyahu’s own failure to appreciate the changing geopolitical dynamics around the world, is a different matter. But what is clear is that Netanyahu has perceived Italy as a country in desperate need of Israeli help. During the meeting with Meloni, Netanyahu promised to make Italy a gas hub for Europe and help Rome solve its water issues, while Meloni, for her part, reiterated that “Israel is a fundamental partner in the Middle East and at a global level”.

The most enthusiastic response to Netanyahu’s visit, however, came from far-right Italian Minister of Infrastructure, Matteo Salvini, who strongly backed the Israeli call to recognize Jerusalem as its capital “in the name of peace, history and truth”. This response, although inconsistent with Italian foreign policy, was hardly a surprise. The leader of the La Lega party has often been criticized for his racist language in the past. Salvini, however, was ‘reformed’ in recent years, especially following a visit to Israel in 2018, where he declared his love for Israel and criticism of Palestinians. It was then that Salvini began rising in the mainstream, as opposed to regional, Italian politics.

But this is not Salvni’s position alone. The Italian government welcomed Netanyahu’s visit without making a single criticism of his far-right government’s extremist policies carried out in Occupied Palestine. While this position is in line with Italian foreign policy, it is hardly surprising from an ideological point of view, as well.

Although Italian politics, in the past, showed great solidarity with the Palestinian people’s struggle for liberation and right of self-determination – thanks to the revolutionary forces that had a tremendous impact on shaping the Italian political discourse during World War II and the country’s subsequent liberation from fascism – that position shifted throughout the years. As Italy’s own politics itself reared towards the Right, its foreign policy agenda in Palestine and Israel completely moved towards a pro-Israel stance. Those now perceived to be pro-Palestine in the Italian government are a few and are often branded as radical politicians.

However, despite the official pro-Israel discourse in Italy, things for Netanyahu are not as easy as they may appear, especially when it comes to recognizing Jerusalem as Israel’s capital.

Indeed, Meloni did not express an outright commitment to the Israeli demand. To the contrary, in an interview with Reuters last August, even before becoming Italy’s prime minister, Meloni seemed cautious, merely stating that this is “a diplomatic matter and should be evaluated together with the foreign ministry”.

There is a reason behind Meloni’s hesitation. Italy’s recognition of Jerusalem as Israel’s capital would place Rome outside the consensus of international law. In an open letter to Meloni, United Nations Special Rapporteur, Francesca Albanese, reminded the Italian government that the recognition of Jerusalem as Israel’s capital would constitute a stark violation of international law.

Italy’s foreign policy is also accountable to the collective policies of the European Union, of which Rome is an integral member. The EU supports the UN’s position that East Jerusalem is an occupied Palestinian city and that Israel’s annexation of the city in 1980 is illegal.

Moreover, Italy’s recent landmark deal with Algeria’s state-owned gas company, Sonatrach, in January, makes it particularly difficult for Rome to take an extreme position in support of Israel. The delicate geopolitical balances resulting from the gas crisis, itself a direct outcome of the Russia-Ukraine war, make any shifts in Italian foreign policy on Palestine and Israel akin to an act of self-harm.

For Italy, at least for now, Arab gas is far more important than anything that Netanyahu could possibly offer. The new Rome-Algiers deal would grant Italy 9bn cubic meters of gas, in addition to the gas supply already flowing through the TransMed pipeline, ‘BNE Intellinews’ reported. This vital infrastructure connects Algeria to Italy via Sicily which, in turn, flows through pipelines under the Mediterranean Sea. “The expansion of these vital routes has already been planned, aiming to augment the current capacity of 33.5 bcm per year,” the business news website added.

Meloni, although a far-right politician with no particular affinity or respect for established international norms, understands that economic interests trump ideology. “Today Algeria is our first gas supplier”, Meloni said in a press conference in Algiers after signing the agreement. The deal, she said, would supply the country with “an energy mix that could shield Italy from the ongoing energy crisis”.

Such a fact would make it impossible for Italy to deviate, at least for now, from its current position regarding Jerusalem, and the illegality of the Israeli occupation of Palestine. While Israel would find it difficult to persuade Italy to change its position, Algeria, Tunisia and other Arab countries might finally find an opening to dissuade Italy from its blind support of Israel.

– Romana Rubeo is an Italian writer and the managing editor of The Palestine Chronicle. Her articles appeared in many online newspapers and academic journals. She holds a Master’s Degree in Foreign Languages and Literature and specializes in audio-visual and journalism translation.

– Dr. Ramzy Baroud is a journalist, author and the Editor of The Palestine Chronicle. He is the author of six books. His latest book, co-edited with Ilan Pappé, is ‘Our Vision for Liberation: Engaged Palestinian Leaders and Intellectuals Speak Out’. His other books include ‘My Father was a Freedom Fighter’ and ‘The Last Earth’. Baroud is a Non-resident Senior Research Fellow at the Center for Islam and Global Affairs (CIGA). His website is http://www.ramzybaroud.net

Algeria’s Gas vs. Rightwing Ideology: Will Italy Change Its Position on Jerusalem?

MARCH 22, 2023

Photograph Source: Blitz1980 – CC BY-SA 4.0

BY RAMZY BAROUD – ROMANA RUBEO

When Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu left Tel Aviv for Rome on March 9, he was flown to Ben Gurion airport in Tel Aviv by a helicopter because anti-government protesters blocked all the roads around it.

Netanyahu’s visit was not met with much enthusiasm in Italy, either. A sit-in was organized by pro-Palestine activists in downtown Rome under the slogan, ‘Non sei il benvenuto’ – ‘You Are Not Welcome’. An Italian translator, Olga Dalia Padoa, also refused to translate his speech at a Rome synagogue, which was scheduled for March 9.

Even Noemi Di Segni, President of the Union of Italian Jewish Communities, though unsurprisingly reiterating her love and support for Israel, expressed her concern for Israeli state institutions.

Back in Tel Aviv, Netanyahu’s trip to Italy was slammed by Israeli opposition leader Yair Lapid as “a wasteful and unnecessary weekend on the country’s dime”. But Netanyahu’s trip to Italy had other goals, aside from spending a weekend in Rome or distracting from the ongoing protests in Israel.

In an interview with the Italian newspaper La Repubblica, published on March 9, the Israeli prime minister explained the lofty objectives behind his trip to Italy. “I would like to see more economic cooperation,” he said. “We have natural gas: we have plenty of it and I would like to talk about how to bring it to Italy to support its economic growth.”

In recent weeks, Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni has shuttled between several countries in search of lucrative gas contracts. Not only does Meloni want to secure her country’s need for energy following the Russia-Ukraine crisis, but she wants Rome to be a major European hub for gas imports and exports. Israel knows this, and is particularly wary that Italy’s major gas deals in Algeria on January 23 could undermine Israel’s economic and political position in Italy, as Algeria continues to serve as a bulwark of Palestinian solidarity throughout the Middle East and Africa.

Netanyahu had other issues on his mind, aside from gas. “On the strategic front, we will discuss Iran. We must prevent it from going nuclear because its missiles could reach many countries, including Europe, and no one wants to be taken hostage by a fundamentalist regime with a nuclear weapon,” Netanyahu said with the usual fear-mongering and stereotypical language pertaining to his enemies in the Middle East.

Netanyahu has two main demands from Italy: not to vote against Israel at the United Nations and, more importantly, to recognize Jerusalem as the capital of Israel. Though East Jerusalem is recognized by the international community as an occupied Palestinian city, Netanyahu wants Rome to change its position, which is consistent with international law, based on the flimsy logic of the “strong and ancient tradition between Rome and Jerusalem”.

Using the same logic, that of natural resources and arms exports in exchange for political allegiance to Israel at the UN, Netanyahu has achieved much success in normalizing ties between his country and many African nations. Now, he is applying the same modus operandi to Italy, a European power and the world’s ninth-largest economy.

Whether this strategy is an outcome of the growing subservience of Europe to Washington and Tel Aviv, or Netanyahu’s own failure to appreciate the changing geopolitical dynamics around the world, is a different matter. But what is clear is that Netanyahu has perceived Italy as a country in desperate need of Israeli help. During the meeting with Meloni, Netanyahu promised to make Italy a gas hub for Europe and help Rome solve its water issues, while Meloni, for her part, reiterated that “Israel is a fundamental partner in the Middle East and at a global level”.

The most enthusiastic response to Netanyahu’s visit, however, came from far-right Italian Minister of Infrastructure, Matteo Salvini, who strongly backed the Israeli call to recognize Jerusalem as its capital “in the name of peace, history and truth”. This response, although inconsistent with Italian foreign policy, was hardly a surprise. The leader of the La Lega party has often been criticized for his racist language in the past. Salvini, however, was ‘reformed’ in recent years, especially following a visit to Israel in 2018, where he declared his love for Israel and criticism of Palestinians. It was then that Salvini began rising in the mainstream, as opposed to regional, Italian politics.

But this is not Salvni’s position alone. The Italian government welcomed Netanyahu’s visit without making a single criticism of his far-right government’s extremist policies carried out in Occupied Palestine. While this position is in line with Italian foreign policy, it is hardly surprising from an ideological point of view, as well.

Although Italian politics, in the past, showed great solidarity with the Palestinian people’s struggle for liberation and right of self-determination – thanks to the revolutionary forces that had a tremendous impact on shaping the Italian political discourse during World War II and the country’s subsequent liberation from fascism – that position shifted throughout the years. As Italy’s own politics itself reared towards the Right, its foreign policy agenda in Palestine and Israel completely moved towards a pro-Israel stance. Those now perceived to be pro-Palestine in the Italian government are a few and are often branded as radical politicians.

However, despite the official pro-Israel discourse in Italy, things for Netanyahu are not as easy as they may appear, especially when it comes to recognizing Jerusalem as Israel’s capital.

Indeed, Meloni did not express an outright commitment to the Israeli demand. To the contrary, in an interview with Reuters last August, even before becoming Italy’s prime minister, Meloni seemed cautious, merely stating that this is “a diplomatic matter and should be evaluated together with the foreign ministry”.

There is a reason behind Meloni’s hesitation. Italy’s recognition of Jerusalem as Israel’s capital would place Rome outside the consensus of international law. In an open letter to Meloni, United Nations Special Rapporteur, Francesca Albanese, reminded the Italian government that the recognition of Jerusalem as Israel’s capital would constitute a stark violation of international law.

Italy’s foreign policy is also accountable to the collective policies of the European Union, of which Rome is an integral member. The EU supports the UN’s position that East Jerusalem is an occupied Palestinian city and that Israel’s annexation of the city in 1980 is illegal.

Moreover, Italy’s recent landmark deal with Algeria’s state-owned gas company, Sonatrach, in January, makes it particularly difficult for Rome to take an extreme position in support of Israel. The delicate geopolitical balances resulting from the gas crisis, itself a direct outcome of the Russia-Ukraine war, make any shifts in Italian foreign policy on Palestine and Israel akin to an act of self-harm.

For Italy, at least for now, Arab gas is far more important than anything that Netanyahu could possibly offer. The new Rome-Algiers deal would grant Italy 9bn cubic meters of gas, in addition to the gas supply already flowing through the TransMed pipeline, ‘BNE Intellinews’ reported. This vital infrastructure connects Algeria to Italy via Sicily which, in turn, flows through pipelines under the Mediterranean Sea. “The expansion of these vital routes has already been planned, aiming to augment the current capacity of 33.5 bcm per year,” the business news website added.

Meloni, although a far-right politician with no particular affinity or respect for established international norms, understands that economic interests trump ideology. “Today Algeria is our first gas supplier”, Meloni said in a press conference in Algiers after signing the agreement. The deal, she said, would supply the country with “an energy mix that could shield Italy from the ongoing energy crisis”.

Such a fact would make it impossible for Italy to deviate, at least for now, from its current position regarding Jerusalem, and the illegality of the Israeli occupation of Palestine. While Israel would find it difficult to persuade Italy to change its position, Algeria, Tunisia and other Arab countries might finally find an opening to dissuade Italy from its blind support of Israel.

Ramzy Baroud is a journalist and the Editor of The Palestine Chronicle. He is the author of five books. His latest is “These Chains Will Be Broken: Palestinian Stories of Struggle and Defiance in Israeli Prisons” (Clarity Press, Atlanta). Dr. Baroud is a Non-resident Senior Research Fellow at the Center for Islam and Global Affairs (CIGA), Istanbul Zaim University (IZU). His website is www.ramzybaroud.net  Romana Rubeo is an Italian writer and the managing editor of The Palestine Chronicle. Her articles appeared in many online newspapers and academic journals. She holds a Master’s Degree in Foreign Languages and Literature, and specializes in audio-visual and journalism translation. 

‘Israel’ hampered with crises, leaving Netanyahu in a pickle: Report

2 Mar, 2023  

Source: The Conversation

By Al Mayadeen English 

A new report by The Conversation argues how Israeli politicians are strongly motivated to strengthen the Haganah-minded politics in “Israel”.

Israeli forces detain a protester during a demonstration in “Tel Aviv” on Wednesday against the government’s overhaul bill. (AFP)

    “Israel” is confronting one of the most critical crises; and it could be the most difficult test yet for the occupation’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who has just recently regained his political career by returning despite a series of scandals and probes, an analysis by Ran Porat for The Conversation acknowledged.

    Netanyahu, the country’s longest-serving prime minister, was deposed in 2021, but mounted a political return last year, gathering enough support to form the most far-right Israeli government ever.

    The paper described how these politicians are strongly motivated to strengthen the Haganah-minded politics in “Israel”.

    Porat explained how Netanyahu was initially successful in rebranding himself as the “responsible adult who would keep his government’s radicals in line,” but his government is currently facing deepening significant schisms.

    He further envisioned that the “situation with the Palestinians” may be escalating, in reference to the illegal Israeli settlers’ rampage, which left one Palestinian murdered and Palestinian cars, homes, and businesses burnt to the ground. The rampage followed a week of brutal aggression against Palestinians in Nablus, in which 11 were killed in an Israeli occupation forces (IOF) raid.

    Netanyahu’s grip over power 

    Porat further expounded that the government’s intended revamping of the judicial system is one of the key concerns causing public outrage.

    This comes as the new administration took unprecedented steps to weaken the occupation’s Supreme Court and further entrench the influence of its far-right coalition, all while escalating brutal aggression against Palestinians.

    What judicial amendments does Netanyahu want? 

    Despite weeks of protests by Israeli settlers, the Knesset voted last Tuesday in favor of going through with the judicial reform legislation, which has been criticized as undermining the separation of power within “Israel”. 

    Settlers across “Israel” have been vehemently protesting the legislation under the pretext of it being a threat to “democracy”, namely how it increases the authority of politicians over judges.

    63 members of the occupation’s Knesset, more than the absolute majority of the quorum, voted in favor of the bill during the first reading.

    Before passing to its second and third readings in the Knesset, the bill will return to the law committee for further discussion.

    The proposed legislation would prevent courts from overturning any amendments made by the government to “Israel’s” quasi-constitutional “Basic Laws”, in addition to giving more weight to the government in the judge selection committee.

    The legislation undermining the judiciary’s independence is fundamental to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s administration, which comprises a coalition of Haganah-minded parties. 

    Netanyahu’s opponents perceive the alleged reforms as a ploy to derail his upcoming corruption trial on allegations of bribery, fraud, and breach of trust.

    The writer also postulated that the turmoil is harming “Israel’s” economy. The Israeli shekel is deteriorating as investors and leading high-tech entrepreneurs withdraw capital from “Israel”, fearing a weakened court system and rule of law.

    Senior US officials have expressed grave concerns about the scope and timeliness of the reform plans.

    Yet, the massive wave of protests has reenergized a fractured and demoralized opposition. Appeals for “civil disobedience” and fights with police have been met with stern warnings from both sides, asking the government to reach an agreement before public outrage escalates into more serious upheaval.

    Read next: As turmoil sears, top Israeli officials engage in frenzy of rage