Posted on November 25, 2016
The mainstream media have been dishing it out so long, it’s kind of nice seeing them taking it on the chin these days. According to a poll published last year, only 4 in 10 Americans trust the mainstream media. My guess is that the number has dropped even lower than that with the 2016 election now behind us.
And so you won’t think it’s just a “Russia thing,” comedian Conan O’Brien has also taken some pot shots at the media as well.
Trump’s tweet about the “failing” New York Times” is quite interesting, and the RT commentator poses a question very much worth asking:
“Will the @realDonaldTrump Twitter account now become the number one source for White House news?”
Personally, I’d be more inclined to believe the veracity of a Trump tweet than a news media of the kind we have today. It occurs to me that to such a degree have media owners and Western journalists discredited themselves, they now may well be on their way to putting themselves out of business. What we seem to be headed for is a major shift, a paradigm shift if you will, in the way news and information are conveyed.
Filed under: Censorship, Clinton, Corporate Media, Fabrications, Freedom of Press, Freedom of Speach, ISIL, Media Lies, Media War, Putin, Richard Edmondson, Trump, USA, Zio-controlled media | Comments Off on Mainstream Media Get a Beat-Down
Orwell’s 1984: EU Resolution on Russian Media First Step Toward Total Censorship, One of the Harshest Attacks on the Profession of Journalist
Orwell’s 1984: EU Resolution on Russian Media First Step Toward Total Censorship
The resolution adopted by the European Parliament against Russia’s media outlets is the first step towards imposing censorship against all media sources which express different views from those promoted by the EU leadership, Italian journalist Giulietto Chiesa warns.
The European Parliament’s decision to crack down on Russia’s news websites, most notably Sputnik and RT, and considering them alongside terrorist groups like Daesh and Al-Qaeda, has stirred a heated debate among international media pundits and independent observers.
“I write for Sputnik and cooperate with different Russian television broadcasters. So what will they do to me now?” Giulietto Chiesa, an Italian journalist and Director of PandoraTV.it, asks rhetorically.
According to Chiesa, the adoption of the controversial resolution is a step towards imposing censorship not only on Russian news websites but on all media outlets which express a point of view different from that of the EU establishment.
“To put it bluntly: the aim of the resolution, whatever arguments are cited, is to impose censorship against all media — both Russian and non-Russian — which express opinions different from those postulated by Western leaders,” Chiesa writes in his op-ed for Sputnik Italia.
The Italian journalist calls attention to the fact that in accordance with the criteria cited by the resolution every citizen of the European Union who supports, reproduces or disseminates opinions and critique of the West’s actions can be now branded as “a supporter of the Kremlin propaganda” that poses a “threat” to the sovereignty of this or that EU member state or the bloc in general.
“It is clear to anyone that this is the way to kick off a ‘witch hunt’, that would ultimately silence all forms of political dissent in Europe,” the Italian journalist warns.
“Therefore what lies at the root of the problem is not just the right to spread the views expressed by the Russian media in the West, but the right of free speech and expression for all journalists, bloggers and media activists who work and live in the West,” Chiesa highlights.
Commenting on the result of the vote in the European Parliament the Italian journalist notes that the vote showed a change of mind toward Russia among EU lawmakers.
While there is a powerful anti-Russian lobby comprising of a hundred or so MPs, apparently nostalgic of the Cold War times, this time the resolution was passed with 304 votes, while 179 legislators were against and 208 abstained from voting, Chiesa underscores.
De facto, the number of those who did not support the controversial document exceeded the number of those who voted for it, he stresses.
Chiesa asks ironically whether the EU establishment would now label the French presidential candidate Francois Fillon as “a Kremlin propagandist” and a “threat” to the European sovereignty given the fact that during his interview with Radio Europe 1 Fillon urged his audience not to believe that Russia is Europe’s enemy.
Jugoslav Cosic of N1 news channel, CNN International’s local broadcast partner and affiliate in Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia and Serbia, echoes Chiesa.
Citing the resolution’s passage de facto equating Russian media organizations to al-Qaeda and Daesh terrorist groups’ propaganda, the journalist stresses that it is highly inappropriate to paint journalists and terrorists with one and the same brush.
“I don’t think it is right to equate the work of Russian journalists (or any other media workers) and the actions of terrorist groups. I also believe it’s not right to brand mass media of any country as a propaganda tool,” Cosic told Sputnik.
If a media outlet has indeed been spotted disseminating “propaganda” then the evidence needs to be presented to prove this instead of labeling all media as instruments of propaganda, he noted.
“This greatly worries me, as we had a very negative experience of group stigmatizing here in Serbia, when NATO bombed the building of RTS channel in 1999, justifying that as ‘the struggle against the Milosevic propaganda machine.’ The airstrikes killed 16 of our colleagues,” the journalist emphasized.
The resolution adopted by the European Parliament claims that the Sputnik news agency, the RT channel, the Russkiy Mir foundation and the Russian Federal Agency for the Commonwealth of Independent States, Compatriots Living Abroad, and International Cultural Cooperation (Rossotrudnichestvo) pose a threat to the European Union.
To resist the “Russian propaganda” the document calls on the EU member states to cooperate with NATO to develop common mechanisms to counter “hybrid threats”.
EU Resolution One of the Harshest Attacks on the Profession of Journalist
The resolution adopted by the European Parliament that compared Russian media to Daesh propaganda, is one of the harshest attacks on journalism, Director of the Radio Belgrade (Radio Beograda) Milivoje Mihajlovic told Sputnik on Thursday.
Mihajlovic said that the document is directly targeting the freedom of media.
“I am particularly surprised by the comparison of the media with terrorist organizations. It’s a classic self-inflicted mistake of the European Parliament, and it will be remembered as one of the harshest attacks on the profession of journalist,” Mihajlovic said.
On Wednesday, the European Parliament voted in favor of a resolution on countering Russian media outlets, such as the Sputnik news agency and the RT broadcaster. As many as 304 voted in favor the document, 179 voted against and 208 abstained. With a total of 691 officials taking part in the vote, less than half supported the resolution, which draws parallel between Russian media and the propaganda disseminated by the Islamic State, a jihadist group outlawed in Russia.
The resolution said that Sputnik and RT posed a danger to European unity and called for extra European Commission funding for counter-propaganda projects.
Sputnik responded by calling the move a direct violation of media freedom and human rights, while Russian President Vladimir Putin commented on the matter by pointing out that the document indicates a degradation of democracy in the West. Praising Sputnik and RT for their work, the president expressed hope that real media restrictions would not follow.
SOURCES: SputnikNews SputnikNews Submitted by Lone Bear War Press Info Network at : https://syrianfreepress.wordpress.com/2016/11/24/eu-orwells-1984/ ~
Filed under: Al Qaeda, Censorship, Corporate Media, Europe, Fabrications, Freedom of Press, Freedom of Speach, ISIL, Media Lies, NATO, Nusra Front, Putin, Russia, Truth, USA | Comments Off on Orwell’s 1984: EU Resolution on Russian Media First Step Toward Total Censorship, One of the Harshest Attacks on the Profession of Journalist
Last month, UK-born Muslim health worker Faizah Shaheen, 27, found that out while returning from her honeymoon trip to Turkey aboard British Thomson Airways at Doncaster Airport in Finningley, England.
A cabin crew member spotted her reading Malu Halasa’s book, Syria Speaks: Art and Culture from the Frontline on outbound flight a fortnight ago . Thinking her a ‘Muslim terrorist’, the attendant reported her to the South Yorkshire police department.
On arrival, Shaheen was detained for investigation under the recently passed anti-terrorist legislation, authored by BIPAC-Tory government, and now forcefully applied by the ‘Israeli tank commander, Theresa May, country’s new prime minister.
During the interrogation, police asked Shaheen what she did for a living.
“I told them I work as a child and adolescent mental health services practitioner for the National Health Service,” she said. “Ironically, a part of my job role is working on anti-radicalization and assessing if vulnerable young people with mental health problems are at risk of being radicalized. I said that to the police. I’m actually part of trying to fight radicalisation and breaking the stereotypes.”
Having now experienced victimization by UK police firsthand, Shaheen will be following up with a formal complaint against the police and Thomson Airways regarding the incident.
Syrian-born Christian Malu Halasa, is an editor, award-wining author and curator in London. She is a well-known critic of Syrian president Bashar al-Assad.
The Israeli occupied United States is not much different. On August 4, 2016, the British newspaper Guardian reported that two American Muslim women who work for the US government, were told to leave an American Airline plane when one of them talked to a ‘civilized White passenger’ about lack of water and food on board. The terrified fool complained to a flight attendant about his personal safety from the two ‘Muzzlooms’. Both Muslim women were taken-off the flight and put on the next flight with $200 as ‘holocaust compensation’.
A good song that possibly would be illegal for Europeans to share on social media sites if Gilad Erdan, Israel’s Public Security Minister, has his way. If you haven’t yet read my article, Zionists Push for Multi-National Firing Squad Aimed at Internet ‘Hate Speech,’ you might check it out.
Filed under: Censorship, Europe, Freedom of Speach, Hate, Jewish terror state, Nazi Israel, Palestine, Richard Edmondson | Comments Off on Some Anti-Israel ‘Incitement’ (still legal under the US Constitution)