HOW JEWISH EXTREMISTS BECAME THE NEW FACE OF ISRAEL

APRIL 26TH, 2024

Source

RAMZY BAROUD

Throughout history, fringe religious Zionist parties have had limited success in achieving the kind of electoral victories that would allow them an actual share in the country’s political decision-making.

The impressive 17 seats won by Israel’s extremist religious party, Shas, in the 1999 elections was a watershed moment in the history of these parties, whose ideological roots go back to Avraham Itzhak Kook and his son Zvi Yehuda Hacohen.

Israeli historian Ilan Pappé referred to the Kooks’ ideological influence as a “fusion of dogmatic messianism and violence.”

Throughout the years, these religious parties struggled on several fronts: their inability to unify their ranks, their failure to appeal to mainstream Israeli society and their inability to strike the balance between their messianic political discourse and the kind of language – not necessarily behavior – that Israel’s western allies expect.

Though much of the financial support and political backing of Israel’s extremists originate in the United States and, to a lesser extent, other European countries, Washington has been clear regarding its public perception of Israel’s religious extremists.

In 2004, the United States banned the Kach party, which could be seen as the modern manifestation of the Kooks and Israel’s early religious Zionist ideologues.

The founder of the group, Meir Kahane, was assassinated in November 1990 while the extremist rabbi – responsible for much violence against innocent Palestinians throughout the years – was giving another hate-filled speech in Manhattan.

Kahane’s death was only the start of much violence meted out by his followers, lead among them an American doctor, Baruch Goldstein, who gunned down on February 25, 1994, dozens of Palestinian Muslim worshippers at the Ibrahimi Mosque in Hebron.

Prayer mats covered in blood at the Ibrahimi mosque in the aftermath of the massacre carried out by Jewish settler Baruch Goldstein, February 25, 1994. (Photo: Al-Khalil)
Prayer mats covered in blood in the aftermath of the massacre carried out by Jewish settler Baruch Goldstein, February 25, 1994. Photo Al-Khalil

The number of Palestinians killed by Israeli soldiers while protesting the massacre was nearly as many as those killed by Goldstein earlier in the day, a tragic but perfect representation of the relationship between the Israeli state and the violent settlers who operate as part of a larger state agenda.

That massacre was a watershed moment in the history of religious Zionism. Instead of serving as an opportunity to marginalize their growing influence by the supposedly more liberal Zionists, they grew in power and, ultimately, political influence within the Israeli state.

Goldstein himself became a hero, whose grave, in Israel’s most extremist illegal settlement in the West Bank, Kiryat Arba, is now a famous shrine, a place of pilgrimage for thousands of Israelis.

It is particularly telling that Goldstein’s shrine was built opposite Meir Kahane’s Memorial Park, which indicates the clear ideological connections between these individuals, groups, and funders.

In recent years, however, the traditional role played by Israel’s religious Zionists began to shift, leading to the election of Itamar Ben-Gvir to the Israeli Knesset in 2021 and, ultimately, to his role as the country’s National Security Minister in December 2022.

Ben-Gvir is a follower of Kahane. “It seems to me that, ultimately, Rabbi Kahane was about love. Love for Israel without compromise, without any other consideration,” he said in November 2022.

But, unlike Kahane, Ben-Gvir was not satisfied with the role of religious Zionists as cheerleaders for the settlement movement, almost daily raids of Al-Aqsa and the occasional attacks on Palestinians. He wanted to be at the center of Israeli political power.

It is an interesting debate whether Ben-Gvir achieved his status as a direct result of the successful grassroots work of religious Zionism or because the political circumstances of Israel itself have changed in his favor. The truth, however, might be somewhere in the middle. Israel’s historic failure of its so-called political left—namely the Labor Party—has, in recent years, propelled a relatively unfamiliar phenomenon—the political center.

Meanwhile, Israel’s traditional right, the Likud party, grew weaker, partly because it failed to appeal to the growing, more youthful religious Zionism constituency and also because of the series of splits that occurred after Ariel Sharon’s breaking up of the party and the founding of Kadima in 2005 – a party that has been long disbanded.

To survive, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has redefined his party to its most extremist version of all time and, thus, began to attract religious Zionists with the hope of filling the gaps created because of internal infighting within the Likud.

By doing so, Netanyahu has granted religious Zionists the opportunity of a lifetime.

Soon, following the October 7 Al-Aqsa Flood operation, and in the early days of the Israeli genocide in Gaza, Ben-Gvir launched his National Guard, a group which he tried, but failed, to compose before the war.

Thanks to Ben-Gvir, Israel, now, per the words of opposition leader Yair, has become a country with a “private militia.”

By March 19, Ben-Gvir announced that 100,000 gun permits had been handed over to his supporters. It is within this period that the US began imposing ‘sanctions’ on a few individuals affiliated with Israel’s settler extremist movement, a slight slap on the wrist considering the massive damage that has already been done and the tremendous violence that is likely to follow in the coming months and years.

Palestine | Israel
With a portrait of late Rabbi Meir Kahane on the wall, left, a Jewish settler walks inside a building taken from a Palestinian family in Hebron, Nov. 16, 2008. Dan Balilty | AP

Unlike Netanyahu, Ben-Gvir’s thinking is not limited to his desire to reach a specific position within the government. Israel’s religious extremists are seeking a fundamental and irreversible shift in Israeli politics.

The recent push to change the relationship between the judicial and exclusive branches of government was as crucial to those extremists as it was to Netanyahu himself. However, the latter has championed such an initiative to shield himself against legal accountability. Ben-Gvir’s supporters have a different reason in mind: they want to dominate the government and the military with no responsibility or oversight.

Israel’s religious Zionists are playing a long game, which is not linked to a particular election, individual or government coalition. They are redefining the state, along with its ideology. And they are winning.

Ben-Gvir and his threats to topple Netanyahu’s coalition government have been the main driving force behind the genocide in Gaza.

If Meir Kahane were still alive, he would have been proud of his followers. The ideology of the once marginalized and loathed extremist rabbi is now the backbone of Israeli politics.

FROM LIBYA TO PARAGUAY: ISRAEL’S LONGSTANDING GOAL OF EXPELLING PALESTINIANS FROM GAZA INCHES CLOSER TO REALITY

JANUARY 10TH, 2024

Source

Jessica Buxbaum is a Jerusalem-based journalist for MintPress News covering Palestine, Israel, and Syria. Her work has been featured in Middle East Eye and The New Arab and Gulf News.

Jessica Buxbaum

Once considered a fringe pipe dream, the once taboo idea of Israelis recolonizing portions of Gaza has been reinvigorated after Hamas’ October 7 attack and the subsequent Israeli war on the embattled Palestinian territory, which has killed more than 22,000 Palestinians, internally displaced more than 1.9 million, and reduced the majority of the Strip into rubble.

Just as 2024 began, Israeli politicians renewed calls to recolonize Gaza, and recent remarks from Israeli lawmakers coupled with a new settler-colonist campaign suggest that Israeli annexation of the beleaguered Palestinian territory has been adopted as official government policy.

On January 1, 2024, Israeli National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir told the press and members of his Jewish Power Party that the war presents an “opportunity to concentrate on encouraging the migration of the residents of Gaza,” proclaiming,

We cannot withdraw from any territory we are in in the Gaza Strip. Not only do I not rule out Jewish settlement there, I believe it is also an important thing

Israeli Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich echoed Ben Gvir’s remarks during his party’s faction meeting, touting,

[the] correct solution [is]… to encourage the voluntary migration of Gaza’s residents to countries that will agree to take in the refugees

Talking to members of his Religious Zionism Party, Smotrich predicted that “Israel will permanently control the territory of the Gaza Strip,” as well as reestablish settlements there. A few days before, in an interview with Israel’s Channel 12, Smotrich said,

We will rule there [Gaza] security-wise, and in order to rule there security-wise for a long time, we will have to be a civilian there

In a separate incident on Monday, Yisrael Beytenu (“Israel is our home”) party leader Avigdor Liberman advocated for Israel to reoccupy southern Lebanon. Israel occupied part of southern Lebanon from 1982 to 2000.

Liberman maintained that Israel would not annex or build settlements in Lebanon but stressed:

“[e]verything between the Litani [River] and Israel must be under the control of the IDF [Israeli military].”

“If Lebanon won’t pay in territory, we haven’t done anything,” Liberman said.

And just before the new year, on December 27, 2023, Tzivka Foghel, a member of Ben-Gvir’s Jewish Power Party, told Israeli Kan radio that Hamas “will pay the price, that we will control the area and bring Jewish settlements.” Foghel clarified he doesn’t just want to re-establish the settlements Israel withdrew from in 2005 but rather take over the entire northern section of the Gaza Strip.

Israeli lawmakers’ inflammatory rhetoric mirrors parts of Israeli society pushing for Israeli settler-colonists to return to the Gaza Strip and even colonize Lebanon. The December 1 issue of Israeli religious youth magazine, “Small World,” outlined five new Israeli settlements south of the Litani River in what would become occupied Lebanon as part of their proposal for the war’s day-after plan.

In line with the politicians’ comments, the Israeli government recently allocated 4.3 million shekels ($1.2 million) in November to “document” Israeli settlements in Gaza, which were withdrawn in 2005. The project is to be handled by Israel’s Minister of Heritage, Amihai Eliyahu, who made headlines in recent months after calling for dropping nuclear bombs on Gaza.

ISRAEL’S CAMPAIGN TO RESETTLE GAZA

During a meeting of hundreds of Israelis in the city of Ashdod in November, Yossi Dagan, head of the Samaria Regional Council, the government body overseeing settlements in the Israeli-occupied northern West Bank, encouraged participants to reach out to their government representatives in support of recolonizing Gaza. Dagan told the crowd,

Dagan is currently leading the Returning Home movement, a coalition of 11 organizations made up of thousands seeking to annul the core part of the 2005 Disengagement Law prohibiting an Israeli civilian presence in Gaza. The initiative has already received government support. Israeli parliamentary members from Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s Likud party submitted a bill to amend the Disengagement Law to grant Israelis freedom of movement in Gaza after the war. Likud members of parliament (or Knesset) Ariel Kellner and Tally Gotliv spoke at the Returning Home inaugural event, along with Jewish Power Party MK Limor Son Har-Melech.

In March 2023, the Israeli parliament annulled part of the law forbidding Israeli settlement in the northern West Bank after Dagan lobbied for the legislative change. Dagan was evacuated from one of the four settlements in the northern West Bank in 2005. He did not respond to MintPress News requests for an interview.

A LONGSTANDING AGENDA

Israel occupied the Gaza Strip in 1967 during the Six-Day War and re-established the first settlement in 1970. In 2005, Israel evacuated around 9,000 Israeli settler-colonists from Gaza. Despite Israel dismantling the bloc of 17 settlements known as Gush Katif, human rights experts say the Gaza Strip remains occupied to this day.

“The test under international law as to whether or not a territory is being occupied and by whom is effective control,” Michael Lynk, who served as the United Nations special rapporteur on human rights in the occupied Palestinian territories from 2016 to 2022, told MintPress News.

“Hamas was ruling Gaza internally, but because Israel had this comprehensive air, sea, and land blockade over Gaza and controlled who and what got into Gaza and who and what left Gaza, it is the occupying power,” Lynk added.

Settler-colonist calls to return to Gaza began as soon as disengagement occurred, with government notions of reestablishing settlements in the Strip quietly materializing behind the scenes.

In 2018, reports revealed the Israeli military was shifting its offensive operations in Gaza from bombardment to carrying out missions that “will enter Gaza and dissect it in two, and even occupy significant parts of it.”

As a reminder, Israel has carried out several schemes throughout the decades to transfer Gaza’s population out of the Strip. Palestinian-Dutch analyst Mouin Rabbani wrote in Mondoweiss how, even before Israel occupied Gaza in 1967, it tried to push Palestinian refugees from Gaza to Libya and Iraq and, after its occupation, began encouraging emigration to the West Bank. In 1969, Israel attempted to send 60,000 Palestinians from the Gaza Strip to Paraguay with payment and the promise of citizenship. The plan was discontinued after two Palestinian transferees killed an Israeli embassy staff member in Asuncion.

After the Knesset vote last year to annul part of the 2005 Disengagement Law, Israeli lawmakers came out in support of a return to Gaza. MK Son Har-Melech urged Israelis not to fall into complacency.

Gush Katif
Sara Malka of Crown Heights, Brooklyn protests in front of UN headquarters in New York against the removal of illegal Israeli settlers from Gaza in 2005. Mary Altaffer | AP

“We must not rest on our laurels or the euphoria of the moment,” Son Har-Melech said. “We must galvanize… the return home to the region of Gush Katif, which was abandoned [in 2005] in an act of terrible folly and has become a nest of terror.”

In a conversation with Israeli Channel 7, Minister of National Missions Orit Strock of the Religious Zionism party said, “I believe that, at the end of the day, the sin of the disengagement will be reversed.”

In response, the Israeli NGO Peace Now said, “It is clear that in addition to the judicial coup, a messianic revolution is taking place. This government will inevitably destroy our country. They will also deepen the occupation, ignite the region, and reestablish a Jewish supremacist regime from the river to the sea.”

“A HOUSE ON THE BEACH IS NOT A DREAM”

As the trend to recolonize Gaza spreads, Lynk considers the option of resettlement in Gaza — even with the state’s most right-wing government in its history — out of the question, explaining to MintPress News that:

If the Americans have already said they’re not in favor of resettling Palestinians out of the Gaza Strip into Egypt or elsewhere in the world, you can be sure the Americans, as much as they’ve protected Israel, would be against any idea of reestablishing Israeli settlements in Gaza.”

While Netanyahu appears to have brushed off the notion of Israeli resettlement in Gaza, saying in December that “it’s not a realistic goal,” he has endorsed military control of the Strip. “Gaza will be demilitarized, and there won’t be any military threat threatening Israel from the Strip. For this to happen, control of the area is required,” Netanyahu said.

That idea was reiterated by Israeli Defense Minister Yoav Gallant this week when he unveiled his post-war plan for Gaza, which would see Israel keeping security control of the Strip with an Israeli-guided Palestinian body carrying out administrative responsibilities.

Mairav Zonszein, an analyst at the nonprofit the International Crisis Group, doesn’t believe that top Israeli officials making the decisions on Gaza are aiming for resettlement. Still, she also doesn’t rule out the possibility.

“That’s not on their agenda, but that doesn’t mean that it can’t come to a point where that would be part of what we see, just because… it’s becoming more of a war of attrition,” Zonszein told MintPress News, emphasizing that while it might not be Netanyahu’s goal, he also hasn’t condemned politicians advocating for resettlement.

The idea of recolonizing Gaza is also gaining momentum with the Israeli public. Images of Israeli soldiers waving Gush Katif settlement flags in Gaza have circulated online. Israeli singers Hanan Ben Ari and Narkis have sung about returning to the settlements when performing for soldiers.

A Channel 12 poll in November found that 44% of Israelis favor renewing settlement in Gaza. When asked what should happen with Gaza when the war is over, 32% answered, “Israel should remain permanently and renew Jewish settlement.”

Under the banner, “A house on the beach is not a dream!” Harei Zahav, an Israeli real estate firm known for building settlements in the West Bank, advertised building Gaza settlements, writing, “We have begun clearing rubble and fending off squatters.”

Yet since sparking controversy, the company’s CEO, Zeev Epshtein, said it was simply a bad joke.

“It was a sort of satirical idea,” Epshtein told Haaretz. “We’re not building, and we have no intention of building. We want it to happen, but it’s the state’s decision. We have no influence on it.”

Despite claiming it was satire, the social media blunder illustrates how Israelis are responding in this moment.

Harei Zahav (Golden  Mountains), a settlement development enterprise is advertising for #Gaza settlements: “a house on the beach is not a dream! We have begun clearing rubble and fending off squatters.” – Itay Epshtain

“[Harei Zahav] name half a dozen reestablished and new #Israeli settlements, and show their approximate location throughout occupied #Gaza,” Israeli human rights lawyer Itay Epshtain wrote on the social media platform X. “While this is a media stunt, it captures a deep sentiment favoring territorial acquisition and colonization at the expanse [sic] of #Palestinians.”

Other events discussing Gaza resettlement have occurred since Returning Home’s November event. In December, during the Jewish festival of Hanukkah, a coalition of settler-colonist groups held the Practical Preparation for Gaza Settlement Conference in Tel Aviv. At the end of December, another group pushing for resettlement, Going Home – Returning to Gush Katif, also held a discussion featuring leaders of the Nachala settler-colonist movement, Daniella Weiss and Zvi Elimelech Sharbaf.

Going Home – Returning to Gush Katif declined to speak with MintPress News. Nachala is a prominent sponsor of the resettlement campaign, even releasing advertisements after the Tel Aviv conference stating, “Gaza is the Land of Israel! Fight. Liberate. Settle,” along with a hotline to register with the movement.

Nachala will hold a conference on January 28 in Jerusalem, presenting plans — including maps and the various stages — for colonizing Gaza. Nachala didn’t respond to MintPress News’ requests for comment but told Channel 12 that thousands of Israelis have expressed interest in joining the movement.

“The public demand for renewed settlement in the Gaza Strip is increasing. After the terrible massacre on October 7, there was a great call among the public that the victory of the war includes Jewish settlement in the Gaza Strip,” Nachala representatives told Channel 12.

Zonszein explained how settlement and safety often go hand-in-hand in the Israeli perspective.

“What Israel is doing in Gaza is very much in line with what it’s always done to occupied Palestinian territory,” Zonszein said. “That you need to put people on the ground — settlers and soldiers — in order to provide security has always been part of the Israeli understanding of how to do things.”

So, as the weeks turn into months and war rages, Israel’s settler-colonist fantasy could very well manifest into reality.

Netanyahu’s end game in Gaza is his own political survival

NOV 28, 2023

Photo Credit: The Cradle

The Cradle’s Palestine Correspondent

Cognizant that a Hamas defeat is unlikely, Israel’s prime minister is set on prolonging the Gaza war, primarily to buy time, safeguard his political legacy, and avoid jail time.

Regardless of how Israel’s brutal war on the Gaza Strip ends, one undeniable outcome seems to be emerging – the potential demise of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s political career. 

Beyond the immediate repercussions of the Hamas-led Al-Aqsa Flood Operation, Netanyahu’s troubles have deep roots, entwined with his relentless efforts to avoid corruption charges and possible imprisonment. This led him to form the most extreme, far-right government in Israel’s history, indirectly setting the stage for the historic operation launched by the Palestinian resistance on 7 October.

Bibi’s political life is on the line 

The occupation state’s military and security establishment, while thought to have been caught off guard by the scale of events on 7 October, had sensed the impending volatility in besieged Gaza, the occupied West Bank, and even the territories occupied in 1948. 

The actions of extremist ministers like Finance Minister Bezalel Somotrich and National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir, whom Netanyahu shielded to maintain the unity of his fragile coalition government, have inarguably contributed to the brewing crisis.

Amidst the carnage and devastation of the ongoing Israeli assault on Gaza, Tel Aviv’s internal political crisis is seeping into the mini-war cabinet assembled to direct the war. The divergence between Netanyahu and military officials, coupled with his initial refusal to pursue a humanitarian truce and prisoner release initiatives, hints at a crisis rooted in the premier himself.

The prime minister’s desperation to cling to his political immunity and avoid imprisonment has him eager to prolong the war on Gaza. He believes it will give him time to strike an exit settlement—likely under US sponsorship—to avert a fate similar to former Prime Minister Ehud Olmert’s post-Lebanon aggression in 2006. This, despite the thousands of Israeli troop deaths and injuries the conflict has borne.

Netanyahu, fully cognizant that eliminating Hamas is an impossible goal, is nonetheless publicly employing this war objective as cover for other strategically beneficial outcomes he is chasing: control over Gaza’s gas, Palestinian displacement projects to Sinai and Jordan, pushing for direct US-Iran confrontations, and the shedding of his extremist allies. 

Likud’s internal struggle

Banking on Washington’s support amidst President Joe Biden’s preoccupation with the 2024 presidential elections, European sympathy intertwined with Israeli gas needs, and Arab expressions of concern without substantive action, Netanyahu is engaged in a high-stakes gamble.

The potential reoccupation of the Gaza coast, with its gas wealth and strategic location – increasingly perceived by some observers to be Israel’s end game in the war – stands as an additional prize for Netanyahu, whose political standing is increasingly fragile. 

Beyond the immediate gains, a resurrection of an old Israeli project – the Ben Gurion Canal from northern Gaza to Eilat – could reshape regional geopolitical and geoeconomic dynamics by bypassing Egypt’s Suez Canal.

However, Netanyahu’s paramount concern isn’t just the war’s outcome or a decline in international support. It is the impending split within his party. The Likud Party recognizes Netanyahu as the source of years-long political crises, marked by five unproductive elections since 2019 and deepening political divisions in Israel. 

The prime minister’s legacy now hangs precariously in the balance as the occupation state contends with the multifaceted political, economic, and security repercussions of its Gaza war. 

If anything, Israel’s disproportionate military response against an overwhelmingly civilian population – more than 20,000 Palestinians killed in six weeks – has worsened the occupation state’s security conditions by drawing in the involvement of the region’s Axis of Resistance, prominently from Lebanon’s Hezbollah, but more audaciously from Yemen’s Ansarallah-led forces

The growing sentiment within the Likud party is that its viability in power is increasingly contingent on ousting its leader. This conviction gained traction with the recent proposition from opposition leader and Yesh Atid party head, Yair Lapid. Essentially, Lapid offered to participate in a Likud government because Netanyahu did not lead it.

Conversely, Netanyahu’s far-right allies recognize that the current government is their sole opportunity to maintain power and implement their extremist agendas. They use this leverage to coerce Netanyahu into retaining financial contributions to religious parties and institutions, legalizing Jewish settlements in occupied Palestinian lands, and concealing crimes against Palestinians—a factor contributing to Al-Aqsa Flood.

Netanyahu acknowledges that the visible involvement of the US in his war could complicate matters further. However, Biden is equally cautious about direct engagement, given the grave threats to and actions against US military bases in Iraq and Syria that are directly correlated to Israel’s escalations in both Gaza and on its Lebanese border.

Al-Aqsa Flood also succeeded in postponing the White House’s Israeli-Saudi normalization project and dampening existing ones – at least until a palatable Palestinian settlement is struck. Any US involvement in Israel’s war would significantly boost the interests of its Russian and Chinese adversaries throughout West Asia and beyond. 

Waiting game in Washington 

With the upcoming presidential elections, the incumbent Democrats may struggle to withstand these threats to US regional interests. As public sentiment turns sharply against Israel’s Gaza brutalities, there is rising domestic dissatisfaction with Biden’s continuous requests for military and financial aid to Ukraine and Israel – as his latest appeal for $106 billion demonstrates.

Biden’s challenges are only exacerbated by his already strained relations with Netanyahu’s government. Before 7 October, those tensions existed because the Israeli prime minister and his extremist allies refused to even contemplate a two-state solution. Washington sees Netanyahu as a major obstacle to any political resolution in occupied Palestine.

If the Biden administration can lay the foundation for a two-state solution – elusive and improbable as it may be – it could exploit this politically and chalk down a “win.” Netanyahu, on his part, aims to prolong the Gaza aggression until Washington yields to his agenda or until there’s a change in the White House. 

Despite some regional and western actors banking on the war’s outcome opening a pathway to restart talks on a permanent peace settlement, the Israeli army has yet to achieve any substantial victory against Hamas. Despite rising extremism post-Al-Aqsa Flood, voices in Israel still express adherence to the land-for-peace equation, notably articulated by opposition leader Yair Lapid.

Striking a balance between deadlock and opportunity, ongoing efforts aim to guide all parties toward a settlement. However, time is becoming a critical factor for the White House. 

The occupation state’s myriad challenges, from confronting threats from West Asia’s resistance axis, and countering Chinese and Russian influence, to overcoming the political liabilities of the Netanyahu government, weigh heavily. Significantly, the potential fallout from a Netanyahu failure looms large, and no geopolitical projects will be able obscure its consequences.The views expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect those of The Cradle.

MOST POPULAR

Overhaul Debate Proceeds as Officials Warn “Israel’s Existence” at Stake

 July 23, 2023

Israeli military chief Herzi Halevi (photo from archive)

Israeli parliament, Knesset, has entered two crucial days to determine the Zionist entity’s future, as several officials are warning that “Israel’s existence” is at stake.

On Sunday, the Knesset debates were held on a judicial reform bill submitted by the coalition and aimed at limiting the Israeli courts’ ability to rule on the “reasonableness” of the government’s decisions.

Likud Rejects Histadrut Proposal

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s Likud party come out against the Histadrut labor federation’s proposal for changing the “reasonableness” bill and resuming talks on the coalition’s judicial overhaul plans.

The party claimed that the bill amounts to a “unilateral acceptance” of the opposition’s stance.

“The proposal completely neuters the amendment on the issue of reasonableness and requires total concession on all the other elements of the reform,” the party said in a statement, as its lawmakers voice rejection to the bill.

The framework put forward by the Histadrut and a group of businesses calls for curtailing the scope of the “reasonableness” bill in its current form, and for an 18-month pause on advancing judicial legislation without broad agreement to allow for compromise talks.

Netanyahu Appears after Getting Pacemaker

In his first remarks since having a pacemaker fitted overnight and after doctors revealed he’d had a potentially life-threatening “transient heart block,” Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu put out a statement on Sunday.

“As you can see, I’m doing great,” he said in a video from the hospital.

Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu speaks in a video from hospital after having a pacemaker installed (July 23, 2023).

He referred to the deliberations on the coalition’s contentious “reasonableness” bill, ahead of the expected final votes in the next day.

“We are continuing with the efforts to complete the legislation — and the effort to do so with agreement,” he said.

“In any case, I want you to know that tomorrow morning I’ll join my friends at the Knesset,” Netanyahu added.

Lapid: Gov’t Decided to Push ‘Israel’ into Abyss

For his part, Opposition leader Yair Lapid slammed the ruling Likud party for rejecting the Histadrut’s proposal.

Israeli opposition leader Yair Lapid while addressing a protest on Saturday (July 22, 2023).

“The opposition was prepared to deliberate [the proposal] but the coalition immediately rejected it out of hand,” Lapid says in a statement.

“It’s not clear who decided to say ‘no’ in their name, but it’s clearer than ever that the extremists in the government decided to push the State of Israel into the abyss.”

Gantz: Rift Seeping into Military

Earlier on Sunday, National Unity party leader Benny Gantz said urged the coalition to halt Sunday’s legislation, warning that the rift is seeping into the Israeli military.

Pleading for a return to negotiations on consensual judicial reform, Gantz told the Knesset: “Partial agreement on ‘reasonableness’” would not solve the crisis if this bill is only the first stage of a wider revolution in the way Israel is governed.

“We must stop, agree, and continue together. I again call on the prime minister and the coalition members who have a sense of responsibility. This framework [of consensus] is right for the State of Israel.”

Beny Gantz addressing the Knesset on Sunday (July 23, 2023).

The Israeli opposition leader warned that the social divisions tied to the coalition’s plan to sap the judiciary of power are spilling over into the Israeli military, as 10,000 reservists say they will not show up for voluntary duty in protest.

While Israeli politics generally endeavors to “keep the IDF outside of disagreements,” Gantz said that “my fear is that’s not the case today.”

“Part of the damage is already irreparable,” Gantz said, insisting on urgency.

Halevi: ‘Israel’ Won’t Exist

On the other hand, Israeli military chief Herzi Halevi warned in a letter published Sunday that if the army won’t be “strong and cohesive” then the Zionist entity “won’t exist as a nation in the region.”

The Israeli Chief of Staff opened his letter with the army’s mission, “to defend the country, to win the war, to ensure its existence.” He defined the strength as coming from “the high readiness for war and the internal and external cohesion.”

“The IDF was born in a time of crisis, out of the need to ensure the existence of the State of Israel. This purpose has not changed even today,” Halevi explained.

In regards to “the assessment of the situation;” the top Israeli commander brought up the recent security incidents, saying that “the urgent outweighs the important.” He added, “we worked to stay out of the controversy, but given its intensity in Israeli society, we got caught up in it and cohesion was damaged. It is our duty to prevent the cracks from expanding.”

Halevi then called “the essence of the dispute” as legitimate, though that was not what he wanted to address, detailing those dangerous cracks as a soldier “thinking that an Air Force pilot will not help him because of that dispute.”

Mass Rallies 

Tens of thousands of demonstrators, opposed to the reform, gathered Saturday evening outside the Knesset and the Supreme Court in occupied Al-Quds (Jerusalem), after having marched from Tel Aviv in order to put pressure on the lawmakers.

Similar rallies are planned on Sunday night, Israeli media reported.

The bill, approved in the first reading two weeks ago, will then be voted on in the second and third reading, which will take place on Monday. If passed, it will be the first major component of the proposed judicial reform to become law.

The reasonableness clause forced Netanyahu in January to dismiss the government’s number two, Aryeh Deri, convicted for tax evasion, following the intervention of the Supreme Court.

Source: Israeli media

75 Years on Establishment of ‘Israel’: The Last Generation?

 May 1, 2023

Protests swept through the Zionist entity over the far-right government’s plan to overhaul judiciary system.

Yahya Dbouk*

Translated by Areej Fatima Al-Husseini

On the 75th anniversary of its ill-fated establishment, the occupation regime is not at its best. Where, in addition to the mounting risks in its strategic surroundings, there is a potentially more imminent menace encircling it from within, shaking it and bringing it even closer to the edge of a “brothers’ war“ whose nightmare hangs over the Israeli elites. Indeed, the two parties to the conflict may eventually reach a temporary “conflict freeze” that will save the entity from a new political and public conflict, similar to the one that accompanied Yoav Gallant’s dismissal. Yet, the aforementioned will not signal the end of the crisis; rather, it will merely be postponed until its rebirth is more forceful and thorough. Perhaps what reinforces such forecasts is that the religious people who are leading the “revolution” today will become a vast majority within a few decades, implying greater effectiveness and wider influence.

“Israel” fails to leave the scene of its months-long turmoil, as solutions falter and the advantages of temporary settlements fade. This is added to deferring hard dues exacerbates and deepens the conflict.

On its 75th year, Israel is no longer able to manage the conflicts of its social components, or so-called tribes, after previously controlling them through “understandings” that combined an emphasis on common denominators with the use of security threats to promote “Jewish cohesion,” in what represents a recipe that has already shown relative success.

However, these disputes were destined to erupt within two or three decades, as the religious “Haredi” component, as well as the national religious component, grew in number, potency, influence, and power. This will compel them to breach such understandings and choose their ideology over other Jews.

During the previous government, led by Yair Lapid, which brought together all of Benjamin Netanyahu’s opponents, the latter sensed an impending threat to him. The threat was to imprison Netanyahu and halt his political career on corruption and bribery charges. On the other hand, the Haredim found themselves without funding for their institutions or social gifts, with the possibility of being forced to enlist in the Israeli army, as well as the adoption of laws and procedures that revoked some of their status and exclusivity.

The previous administration reminded the fascist extreme right, or “religious Zionists,” that settlements on the so-called “Jewish land in the West Bank” are still viable and have not been fully eliminated from the lexicon of certain groups of Israelis. It also cautioned them that their ambition to Judaize and Talmudize the ‘state’ at the cost of liberals and traditional Jews would not be readily realized.

This combination of threats and dangers compelled those targeted to collaborate, allowing Netanyahu to evade prosecution for his crimes. Such combination also empowered the religious groups, of all types, to enforce their will through laws and legislation that are not susceptible to veto or rejection by the judiciary, which retains power and rejects any attempt to favor one Jewish community over another.

As a result, interests have been focused on eliminating the Supreme Court’s authority to nominate justices and restricting the latter’s capacity to evaluate laws, which is a topic of discord. However, in a “normal” state, such a dispute would not have resulted in the division that Israel is experiencing nowadays. Thus, the current scenario foreshadows civil war, with predecessors that can only be explained by the presence of significant contrasts in visions, aspirations, and ideologies.

After two or three decades, the religious Jews will become the numerical majority, bolstering their position and ability to influence and fight political battles.

As a result, it is evident that the heart of the battle is to prevent or offer an opportunity for Jewish social components to impose their will on other Jewish groups. It is worth noting that proponents of change today seek to monopolize power and implement Talmudic governance by breaching the “defensive wall” represented by the judiciary. Whereas, the opposing camp refuses to harm the judiciary and demands that its powers remain unchanged to prevent any change in the social contract in place for the past seven decades.

The various religious “Haredi” parties are in the first camp, with religious Zionists (the national religious current) on their side, as well as Netanyahu’s right-wing and liberal Likud party.

The second camp is comprised of liberals from multiple parties and movements (right, left, centrist, and even traditional, including an important segment of the “Likud” base). It also includes the majority of Israeli women and youth, as well as homosexuals, who have become prominent number among Jewish organizations. In addition to economists, sociologists, industrialists, diplomats, and others with economic, social, and political contacts overseas.

The division reached the social, economic, political, and diplomatic sectors, as well as military and security institutions. The reservists – the most significant, effective, and influential component in the Israeli army – are at risk of disintegration as the number of individuals refusing to serve has grown, as well as reservists in the Air Force, intelligence, and the Mossad.

On the economic front, the split manifests into warnings of a “gloomy future” for ‘Israel’ as a result of capital flight, evacuation of institutions and corporations, and investor withdrawal. Hence, the protest wave grew to the point where Netanyahu could no longer contain it, especially after he decided to fire his security minister, Yoav Galant (of the Likud), to teach the “Likudists” a lesson. This decision, however, had disastrous ramifications, compelling him to suspend the “judicial overhaul” plan rather than cancel it.

This suspension prompted a decrease in demonstrations, but it wasn’t sufficient to stop them. Rather, opponents are waiting for Netanyahu at the “junction” to re-occupy the squares, while the future coalition is not entirely clear, despite the approaching deadline for postponing the overhaul, which is set for May 1st. Will the coalition then return to the “reform” path, attracting larger and broader protests? Or retreat without admitting failure? Also, what will the opposition’s stance be in both cases? Will they be content with Netanyahu’s retreat, or will they demand more?

Whatever occurs, it will not end the divide, which has deepened as a result of the current crisis. Accordingly, if the religious are unable to dismantle the internal equations and excessive social contracts that exist among Jews, ‘Israel’ will be at a later date, in the near future, with the renewal of the coup attempt, when the numerical status of these people has been further strengthened.

In 2022, religious groups in ‘Israel’ reached 36% of Jews, as opposed to a Jewish majority comprised of secular and non-religious or semi-religious traditionalists. However, this minority, which now controls the government coalition, is likely to grow in number, eventually outnumbering secularists and others. This indicates that within two or three decades, the religious will become the numerical majority, strengthening their position and power to influence and wage political wars.

Therefore, ‘Israel’ is on the verge of further division and maybe civil war, unless decision-makers take action to delay the eruption and let the conflicts be managed for a longer period, especially because agreement on a key consensus is not feasible. Further, if the “brothers’ war” isn’t already bloody, it will be shortly, unless solutions, that are still too vague to discuss, emerge.

* Yahya Dbouk is a Lebanese journalist who writes for Al-Akhbar Lebanese newspaper. This article was published by the daily on Thursday, April 27, 2023.

Source: Al-Akhbar Newspaper (Translated by Al-Manar English Website Staff)

Related Videos

The President of the European Commission bears false witness on the 75th anniversary of the Nakba of Palestine
Amman Statement.. Emphasis on the political solution in Syria and preserving its unity
Amman Five-Way Meeting.. Beginning of a Path?

Related Articles

Israeli army baffled by PM allegation of having attacked Hezbollah: Report

 April 11 2023

Polls show support for Netanyahu and his far-right coalition government has plummeted in recent weeks

(Photo Credit: AP)

ByNews Desk

The Israeli army was taken aback by the allegations of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who said on 10 April that cross-border attacks on Lebanon last week targeted Hezbollah positions.

“In the attacks on Lebanon, in addition to the positions of Hamas, we also targeted the positions of Hezbollah in Lebanon,” the Israeli premier said during a news conference on Monday.

According to Yossi Yehoshua, the military affairs commentator for Israeli daily Yedioth Ahronoth, “The army was very surprised to hear Netanyahu say that Hezbollah’s infrastructure was attacked in Lebanon,” as Tel Aviv took great care to only hit alleged Hamas targets.

Netanyahu’s sham allegation came during a press conference in which he also backpedaled on his decision to sack Defense Minister Yoav Gallant.

“I’ve decided to put our differences behind us,” the embattled premier said about Gallant.

Earlier in his speech, Netanyahu took aim at the opposition led by former prime minister Yair Lapid, blaming him for the multiple crises gripping Israel.

“Our country is under a terrorist assault … [But it] did not start now. Under the previous government, the number of terror attacks doubled,” Netanyahu said before accusing Lapid and his officials of “showing weakness” and “emboldening Israel’s enemies.”

In particular, the premier pointed to the maritime border demarcation deal signed with the Lebanese government last year under US mediation, claiming that the agreement had instead been signed with Hezbollah “without getting anything in return.”

Netanyahu also blasted Israeli citizens and army reservists who took to the streets en masse to protest against his judicial overhaul plan, saying, “When you declare that the State of Israel is collapsing, how do you think our enemies interpret this?”

Monday’s speech came just hours after Israel’s Channel 13 released poll results showing that support for Netanyahu’s Likud party has nosedived.

According to the survey, more than two-thirds of voters disapproved of Netanyahu’s performance in office. If elections were held today, Likud would lose more than a third of its seats in the Knesset.

Israeli PM Netanyahu postpones judicial reform law

27 Mar 2023

Source: Israeli Media

By Al Mayadeen English 

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu suspends his cabinet’s bid to overhaul the judiciary in light of stark tensions in “Israel”.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, second right, stands on the floor of the Knesset, during a vote as people mass outside to protest his government’s plan to overhaul the judicial system, in occupied Al-Quds, occupied Palestine, March 27, 2023 (AP)

Israeli occupation Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu decided Monday to suspend his cabinet’s plans to reform the judiciary, though he stressed that “we will never give it up.”

Israeli occupation Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu decided Monday to suspend his cabinet’s plans to reform the judiciary, though he stressed that “we will never give it up.”

“There is a minority that is ready to use violence, commit arson, and call for refusing to be drafted into the army,” said Netanyahu. “Israel would not exist without the army.”

“We stand before our brothers, and civil war between brothers is not allowed,” he added during a press conference, stressing the need for dialogue and consultation on the issue of judicial reform.

The decision to suspend the judicial amendments and give dialogue a chance is “at the height of a serious crisis that endangers Israeli unity,” the occupation premier said. “I decided to postpone the second and third readings in the current Knesset session.”

“We have the majority in the street and in the Knesset, and we will not allow the election results to be stolen, and there is a minority ready to tear Israel into pieces,” Netanyahu added.

“Israel cannot exist without the army, and the latter cannot tolerate disobedience,” Netanyahu underlined.

Israeli media reported earlier in the day that Israeli occupation Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Police Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir have agreed to postpone the judicial reform law until the Knesset’s summer session.

“Netanyahu is now holding a meeting with Ben-Gvir and ministers from his Likud party, to discuss developments,” Israeli media added, highlighting that “Netanyahu pledged to Ben-Gvir that the cabinet would approve the establishment of a National Guard as a subordinate to the Police Ministry.”

Ben-Gvir commented on the decision to postpone the decision to reform the judiciary, saying: “Netanyahu pledged that the reform will be proposed in the Knesset in its summer session, even if no agreement was reached about it.”

Furthermore, in response to Netanyahu taking a U-turn, mass demonstrations took place in “Tel Aviv”, and the Histadrut trade union decided to stop the strike it had in place.

Israeli Justice Minister Yariv Levin said, “suspending the judicial reform puts them to bed.”

Former Israeli Security Minister Benny Gantz called on Netanyahu to keep Security Minister Yoav Gallant in his post, while opposition leader Yair Lapid said: “This crisis is the biggest in Israeli history, and we share the responsibility to solve it together.

The Israeli KAN public broadcaster reported that Police Minister Itamar Ben Gvir clashed verbally with Netanyahu, and shouted at him during a meeting between the coalition heads.

Ben-Gvir told Netanyahu earlier in the day, as reported by the Israeli KAN public broadcaster, that he would “resign from the government if the legislation is postponed.” The far-right minister also underlined that he would continue pushing for the judicial overhaul from outside his coalition with Netanyahu.

Israeli media said earlier in the day that Benjamin Netanyahu had “overcome” the obstacles to announcing the freezing of controversial judicial amendments through an agreement he concluded with ministers Ben-Gvir and Levin.

After hours-long deliberations with the government’s coalition parties, Netanyahu left his office to the Knesset in occupied Al-Quds, where thousands are protesting the government’s judicial amendments.

The Israeli Maariv newspaper said Netanyahu would announce a temporary suspension of the judicial reform later in the day.

The Israeli KAN broadcaster highlighted that Lapid told Netanyahu that he was ready to guarantee a safety net for the current government, noting that if one of the government’s parties refuse to postpone legislation and withdraw from the coalition, he would guarantee votes that ensure that the coalition government does not fall for such a reason.

Furthermore, the broadcaster said Gallant would remain in his post if Netanyahu goes back on his decision to sack him.

Netanyahu’s office announced in a brief statement that the Prime Minister has decided to sack Gallant. However, the Times of Israel noted that “it is unclear what new position he will be given, if any.” As per Maariv, Netanyahu now has 48 hours to appoint a new security minister.

According to The Jerusalem Post, Netanyahu told Gallant that he lost his trust in him after he “went behind the government’s back” on Saturday while the occupation Prime Minister was visiting London.

‘Israel’ Eroding From Within

Over the past month, upheaval and chaos took the Israeli occupation entity by storm. Violent clashes erupted between the opposition and police, as Israeli settlers protest against the government’s judicial reforms. Appeals for civil disobedience and riots have been met with stern warnings from both sides, as political rifts are widening and warning against the outbreak of a “civil war”.

Judicial reforms divide the Likud

26 Mar 2023  

Prepared By: Al Mayadeen Executed By: Al Mayadeen

The judicial reform controversy continues to wreak havoc in Israeli politics, as the far-right Likud party is witnessing rifts among its members who are divided between supporting and opposing the reforms.

Liberman: Netanyahu “Coward” in front of Nasrallah, “Lion” in front of Likud

 March 24, 2023

Avigdor Liberman (L) and Benjamin Netayhau (R), in a photo from 2016.

Israeli opposition lawmaker Avigdor Liberman lashed out at Benjamin Netanyahu, saying the Israeli PM was acting like a coward in front of Hezbollah and Hamas, while acting like a lion in front of his friends in Likud.

In remarks on Thursday, Liberman said: “Netanyahu, who acts like a coward in front of (Hezbollah S.G. Sayyed Hasan) Nasrallah, and (Hamas Chief Yahya) Sinwar, and undermines Israel’s deterrence, is now acting like a lion in front of his friends in the Likud. It is a shame that it is not the other way round.”

The former Finance Minister asserted that the “current conflict in the Israeli society is not between the left and the right wings, but rather between those who serve in the army, work and pay taxes, and those who and seek after power, along with their allies.”

Meanwhile, Liberman addressed Defense Minister Gallant’s decision to postpone his public address in which he was expected to call to freeze the legislation due to concerns for Israel’s national security, calling it “political suicide.”

Earlier on Thursday, Netanyahu confirmed his government’s determination to move forward with the judicial overhaul.

“We will not allow any internal dispute between us to threaten the future and security of Israel,” Netanyahu said.

Source: Al-Manar English Website and Israeli media

Related News

In the War Between Judaism and Democracy in Israel, Anything Is Possible

March 19, 2023

Former British diplomat, founder and director of the Beirut-based Conflicts Forum.

Alastair Crooke

Bibi is by nature cautious – even timid. His radical ministers, however, are not, Alastair Crooke writes.

Michael Omer-Man writes: Almost exactly 10 years ago, a young star rising in the Likud party, spoke to an audience committed to the outright annexation of the occupied Palestinian territories, laying out his blueprint. A year later, this same speaker set out certain prerequisites to full annexation: Firstly, a shift in the way the Israeli public thinks about a ‘two-state solution’ for Palestine; and secondly, a radical recast of the legal system “that will allow us to take those steps on the ground … that advance sovereignty”.

What was reflected in this statement is the structural dichotomy inherent within the ‘idea’ of ‘Israel’: What then is ‘Israel’? One side holds that Israel was founded as a ‘balance’ between Jewishness and Democracy. The other says ‘nonsense’; it was always the establishment of Israel on the “Land of Israel”.

Ami Pedahzur, a political scientist studying the Israeli Right, explains that the religious Right “has always considered the Israeli Supreme Court to be an abomination”. He points out that the extremist Meir Kahane “once wrote extensively about the tension between Judaism and democracy and the need for a Sanhedrin [a biblical system of judges] instead of the extant Israeli judicial system”.

In Israel’s attempt to balance these opposing visions and interpretations of history, the Israeli Right sees the judiciary as deliberately having been tilted toward democracy (by one part of the Israeli élite). This simmering tension finally exploded with the 1995 Supreme Court claim that it possessed power of judicial review over Knesset (parliamentary) legislation deemed to be in conflict with Israel’s quasi-constitutional Basic Laws. (An Israeli constitution has been considered since 1949, but never actuated.)

Well, that ‘young star’ of 10 years ago – who asserted so forcefully “We cannot accept … a judicial system that is controlled by a radical leftist, post-Zionist minority that elects itself behind closed doors – dictating to us its own values – today is Israel’s Justice Minister, Yariv Levin.

And with time, Netanyahu has indeed already brought about that first prerequisite (outlined by Levin almost a decade ago): The Israeli public perspective on the two-state Olso formula is radically changed. Political support for that project hovers close to zero in the political sphere.

More than that, today’s Prime Minister, Netanyahu, explicitly shares the same ideology as Levin and his colleagues – namely that Jews have a right to settle in any, and all, parts of the ‘Land of Israel’; he also believes that the very survival of the Jewish people is dependent on the actuation of that divine obligation into practice.

Many on the Israeli Right, Omer-Man suggests, therefore see the Supreme Court as “the central impediment to their ability to fulfil their annexationist dreams, which for them are a combination of messianic and ideological commandments”.

They saw the 1995 Supreme Court ruling as ‘a coup’ that ushered in the judiciary’s supremacy over law and politics. This is a view that is hotly contested – to the point of near civil war – by those who advocate for democracy versus a strict Judaic vision of religious law.

From the perspective of the Right, Ariel Kahana notes that although

“they have continued to win time and again – but they have never held power in the true sense of the word. Through the judiciary, the bureaucracy, the defence establishment, academia, cultural elites, the media, and some of the economic wheelers and dealers, the Left’s doctrine continued to dominate Israel’s power foci. In fact, regardless of who the cabinet ministers were, the old guard has continued with its obstructionist insurgency”.

Today, however, the numbers are with the Right – and we are witnessing the Israeli Right’s counter-coup: a judicial ‘reform’ which would centralize power in the Knesset – precisely by dismantling the legal system’s current checks and balances.

Ostensibly this schism constitutes the crisis bringing hundreds of thousand Israelis on to the street. Prima Facie, in much of the media, at issue is who has the final word: the Knesset or the Supreme Court.

Or, is it? For, beneath the surface, unacknowledged and mostly unsaid, is something deeper: It is the conflict between Realpolitik versus Completion of the Zionist project. Put starkly, the Right says it’s clear: Without Judaism we have no identity; and no reason to be in this land.

The ‘less said’ fact is that much of the electorate actually agrees with the Right in principle, yet opposes the full annexation of the West Bank on pragmatic grounds: “They believe that the status quo of a “temporary” 55-plus-year military occupation is the more strategically prudent”.

“Formally [annexing West Bank] would make it too difficult to convince the world that Israel is not an apartheid regime in which half of the population — Palestinians — are denied basic democratic, civil, and human rights”.

That other unresolved contradiction (that of continuing occupation within ‘democracy’) is also submerged by the prevalent mantra of ‘Right wing Orbánism versus democracy’. Ahmad Tibi, an Palestinian member of the Knesset earlier has wryly noted: “Israel indeed is ‘Jewish and democratic’: It is democratic toward Jews – and Jewish toward Arabs”.

The mass of protestors gathered in Tel Aviv carefully choose to avoid this oxymoron (other than around the kitchen table) – as a Haaretz editorial a few days ago made clear: “Israel’s opposition is for Jews only”.

Thus, the crisis that some are warning could lead to civil war at its crux is that between one group – which is no longer content to wait for the right conditions to arrive to fulfil the Zionist dream of Jewish sovereignty over the entire Land of Israel – versus an outraged opposition that prefers sticking to the political tradition of buying time by “deciding not to decide”, Omer-Man underlines.

And although there are ‘moderates’ amongst the Likud lawmakers, their concerns are eclipsed by the exultant mood at their party’s base:

“Senior Likud officials, led by Netanyahu, have incited Likud voters against the legal system for years, and now the tiger is out of control. It has its trainer in its jaws and threatens to crush him if he makes concessions”.

The flames lick around Netanyahu’s feet. The U.S. wants quiet; It does not want a war with Iran. It does not want a new Palestinian Intifada – and will hold Netanyahu’s feet to the flames until he ‘controls’ his coalition allies and returns to an Hebraic ‘quietism’.

But he can’t. It’s not possible. Netanyahu is held limp in the tiger’s jaws. Events are out of his control.

A prominent member of Likud’s central committee told Haaretz this week:

“I don’t care if I have nothing to eat, if the army falls apart, if everything here is destroyed … The main thing is that they not humiliate us once again, and appoint Ashkenazi judges over us”.

The ‘second Israel’ genres have wailed against ‘the ten Ashkenazai judges’ who discredited their leader (Arye Dery), whilst breaking into a song of praise for the ‘only Sephardic judge’ who was sympathetic to Dery. Yes, the ethnic and tribal schisms form a further part of this crisis. (A bill that effectively would reverse the Supreme Court decision barring Dery from his ministerial position over previous corruption charges is currently making its way through the Knesset).

The appeal of Religious Zionism is often attributed to its growing strength amongst the young – particularly ultra-Orthodox men and traditional Mizrahi voters. What became abundantly clear and unexpected in recent weeks, however, is that the appeal of a racist such as Ben-Gvir, is spreading to the young secular left in Israel. Among young Israelis (ages 18 – 24), more than 70% identify today as Right.

Just to be clear: The Mizrahi ‘underclass’, together with the Settler Right, have ousted the ‘old’ Ashkenazi élite from their hold on power. They have waited many years for this moment; their numbers are there. Power has been rotated. The fuse to today’s particular crisis was lit long ago, not by Netanyahu, but by Ariel Sharon in 2001, with his entry to the Temple Mount (Haram al-Sharif).

Sharon had earlier perceived that a moment would arrive – with a weakened U.S. – when it might prove propitious for Israel to complete the Zionist project and seize all the ‘Land of Israel’. The plans for this venture have been incubating over two decades. Sharon lit the fuse – and Netanyahu duly took on the task of curating a constituency towards despising Oslo and the judicial system.

The project’s content is explicitly acknowledged: To annex the West Bank and to transfer any political rights of Palestinians remaining there to a new national state to the east of the River Jordan, on the site of what now is the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan. In the confusion and violence which would accompany such a move, Palestinians would be ‘persuaded’ to migrate to the ‘other bank’. As Hussein Ibish warned two weeks ago:

“We’re getting awfully close to the point where the Israeli government, and even Israeli society, could countenance a big annexation – and even expulsion [of Palestinians] – done in the middle of an outbreak of violence, and it would be framed as a painful necessity,” Ibish said. Such a move, he added, would be justified “as the government saying ‘We’ve got to protect Israeli settlers – they are citizens too – and we can’t let this go on anymore. Therefore we have to annex and even expel Palestinians.’”

To be fair, the unspoken fear of many secular protesters in Israel today, is not just that of being politically deposed, and their secular lifestyle circumscribed by religious zealots (though that is a major driver to sentiment), but rather, by the unspoken fear that to implement such a radical project against the Palestinians would lead to Regional war.

And ‘that’ is far from an unreasonable fear.

So there are two existential fears: One, that survival of the Jewish people is contingent on fulfilling the obligation to establish ‘Israel’ as ordained; and two, that to implement the consequent exodus of the Palestinians would likely result in the demise of the Israeli State (through war).

Suddenly and unexpectedly, into this fraught situation – with Netanyahu buffeted by a whirlwind of external and internal pressures – arrived a bombshell: Netanyahu was stripped of his ace card – Iran. In Beijing, China had secretly orchestrated not just the resumption of diplomatic relations between Saudi Arabia and Iran, but laid down the framework for a regional security architecture.

This represents a nightmare for Washington and Netanyahu – particularly for the latter, however.

Since the early 1990s, Iran has served both these parties as the ‘bogey man’, by which to divert attention from Israel and the situation of the Palestinians. It has worked well, with the Europeans acting as enthusiastic collaborators in facilitating (or ‘mitigating’ – as they would see it), Israel’s ‘temporary’, 55-year occupation of the West Bank. The EU even financed it.

But now, that is blown away. Netanyahu may ‘huff and puff’ about Iran, but absent a Saudi and Gulf willingness to lend Arab legitimacy to any military action against Iran (with all the risks that entails), Netanyahu’ s ability to distract from the domestic crisis is severely limited. Any call to strike Iran’s nuclear facilities is an obvious non-starter in the light of the Iranian-Saudi rapprochement.

Netanyahu may not want a show-down with Team Biden, but that’s what is coming. Bibi is by nature cautious – even timid. His radical Ministers, however, are not.

They need a crisis (but only when the ‘prerequisites’ are all lined up). It is clear that the wholesale stripping of Palestinian rights, in tandem with the emasculation of the Supreme Court, is not a project that can be expected to quietly proceed in normal circumstances – especially in the present emotive state across the global sphere.

No doubt, the Israeli Right has been watching how the Lockdown ‘Emergency-crisis fear’ in Europe was used to mobilise a people to accept a compulsion and restrictions to life that in any other circumstance they would never rationally accept.

It won’t be a new pandemic emergency, of course, in the Israeli case. But the new Palestinian Authority-led ‘SWAT-squads’ arresting Palestinian resistance fighters in broad daylight is bringing the West Bank ‘pressure-cooker’ close to blow-out.

Ben Gvir may simply decide to follow in Sharon’s footsteps – to allow and participate in the Passover ceremony of sacrificing a lamb on Al-Aqsa (the Temple Mount) – as a symbol of the commitment to rebuild the ‘Third Temple’, permission for which, hitherto has always been denied.

So what happens next? It is impossible to predict. Will the Israeli military intervene? Will the U.S. intervene? Will one side back-down (unlikely says ex-Head of Israel’s National Security Council, Giora Eiland)? Yet even if the ‘Judicial reform’ is somehow halted, as one exasperated Israeli forecast, “Even if this time the attempt does not succeed, it’s likely that they [the Right] will try again in another two years, another five years, another 10 years. The struggle will be long and difficult, and no one can guarantee what the result will be.”

‘Total Fascism’: Israeli Parliament Passes Death Penalty Bill Targeting Palestinians

March 1, 2023

Far-right Israeli politician Itamar Ben-Gvir. (Photo: Shay Kendler, via Wikimedia Commons)

Israeli lawmakers have voted in favor of a bill that would impose the death penalty on so-called “terrorists” accusing of killing Israelis. Backed by rightwing Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his hardline allies, the bill has been bitterly opposed by Palestinians and foreign observers.

The death penalty bill passed its first reading in the Israeli parliament (Knesset) by 55 votes to nine on Wednesday. Most of the opposition – led by former Prime Minister Yair Lapid – abstained from the vote in protest.

The bill was authored by MP Limor Son Har-Melech and supported by Netanyahu and National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir. Both Son Har-Melech and Ben-Gvir are members of the ‘Jewish Power’ party, an extremist Zionist faction that helped Netanyahu’s right-wing Likud party back into power in last November’s elections.

Under the legislation, anyone who “intentionally or out of indifference causes the death of an Israeli citizen when the act is carried out from a racist motive or hate to a certain public… and with the purpose of harming the State of Israel and the rebirth of the Jewish people in its homeland” shall face execution, with no chance of prison time.

The law would apply in the West Bank, which although partially administered by the Palestinian Authority, is subject to Israeli military occupation and law.

The bill crosses “a clear red line as part of Israel’s slide into total fascism,” Arab-Israeli political party Hadash Ta’al said in a statement. “Today it is the Palestinians, tomorrow it will be the protestors on the streets. Ben-Gvir will be easy on the trigger when it comes to determining who is a terrorist.”

The Palestinian Authority said that the bill is “cruel, barbaric, and inhumane,” describing it as “rooted in Jewish supremacy.” Its passage will lead to Palestinians “arbitrarily and ceremonially being put on death row,” its statement continued.

Thousands of Israelis gathered outside the country’s parliament building in recent days to protest the bill, while opposition poured in from abroad. Speaking after a meeting with Israeli Foreign Minister Eli Cohen on Tuesday, German Foreign Minister Annalena Baerbock called the bill “particularly worrying,” given that Israel has not executed anyone since Nazi war criminal Adolf Eichmann was hanged in 1962.

(RT, Palestine Chronicle) 

LATEST POSTS

ISRAEL’S WAR ON GAZA: FROM INHUMAN WEAPON EXPERIMENTS TO POLITICAL EXPERIMENTS ON PALESTINIANS

FEBRUARY 9TH, 2023

Source

RAMZY BAROUD

Though Israel’s past wars on Gaza have often been justified by Tel Aviv as a response to Palestinian rockets or, generally, as acts of self-defense, the truth is different. Historically, Israel’s relationship with Gaza has been defined by Tel Aviv’s need to create distractions from its own fractious politics, to flex its muscles against its regional enemies and to test its new weapons technology.

Though the Occupied West Bank – in fact, other Arab countries, too – has been used as a testing ground for Israel’s war machine, no other place has allowed Israel to sustain its weapon experimentation for as long as Gaza, making Israel, as of 2022, the world’s tenth largest weapons exporter.

There is a reason why Gaza is ideal for such grand, albeit tragic, experiments.

Gaza is a perfect place for gathering information once new weapons have been deployed and used on the battlefield. The Strip is home to two million Palestinians who live squalid lives with virtually no clean water and little food, all of them confined within 365 km² (approx. 181 mi²). In fact, due to Israel’s so-called safety belts, much of Gaza’s arable lands which border Israel are off limits. Farmers are often shot by Israeli snipers, almost at the same frequency as Gaza’s fishermen are also targeted, should they dare venture beyond the three nautical miles allocated to them by the Israeli navy.

“The Lab,” an Israeli award-winning documentary released in 2013, discussed in painful detail how Israel has turned millions of Palestinians into actual human laboratories for testing new weapons. Gaza, even before, but especially since then, has been the main testing ground for these weapons.

POLITICIANS’ PLAYTHING

Gaza has been ‘the lab’ for Israeli political experimentations as well.

When, from December 2008 to January 2009, then Israel’s Acting Prime Minister Tzipi Livni decided to, in her own words, “go wild” by unleashing one of the deadliest wars on Gaza, the Israeli politician was hoping that her military adventure would help solidify support for her party at the Knesset.

Livni, at the time, was the head of Kadima, which was established in 2005 by the former leader of the Likud, Ariel Sharon. As Sharon’s successor, Livni wanted to prove her own worth as a strong politician capable of teaching Palestinians a lesson.

Though her experiment then won her some support in the February 2009 elections, it backfired badly following the November 2012 war, where Kadima was nearly destroyed in the January 2013 elections. Eventually, Kadima vanished altogether from Israel’s political map.

This was not the first, nor the last, time that Israeli politicians have attempted to use Gaza as a way to distract from their own political woes, or to demonstrate, through killing Palestinians, their qualifications as protectors of Israel.

BIBI’S BOMBS

Yet, no one has perfected the use of violence to score political points as much as Israel’s current Prime Minister, Benjamin Netanyahu. Returning as the head of Israel’s most extremist government in history, Netanyahu is keen to stay in power, especially since his rightwing coalition has more comfortable support margins in the Knesset than any of Israel’s five governments in the last three years.

With a rightwing, pro-war constituency that is far more interested in illegal settlement expansion and ‘security’ than economic growth or socio-economic equality, Netanyahu should, at least technically, be in a stronger position to launch another war on Gaza. But why is he hesitating?

On February 1, a Palestinian group fired a rocket toward southern Israel, prompting an Israeli response that was intentionally limited.

According to Palestinian groups in the besieged Strip, the rocket was fired as part of the ongoing armed rebellion by West Bank Palestinians. It was meant to illustrate the political unity between Gaza, Jerusalem and the West Bank.

The West Bank is living its darkest days. 35 Palestinians were killed by the Israeli army in January alone, ten of whom perished in Jenin in a single Israeli raid. A Palestinian, acting alone, responded by killing seven Jewish settlers in Occupied East Jerusalem, the perfect spark of what is usually a massive Israeli response.

But that response has been confined, thus far, to the demolition of homes, arrest and torture of the attacker’s family members, military sieges on various Palestinian towns and hundreds of individual assaults by Jewish settlers on Palestinians.

BULLETS, BUDDIES AND “BAD GUYS”

An all-out Israeli war, especially in Gaza, has not yet actualized. But why?

First, the political risks of attacking Gaza through a long war, for now, outweigh the benefits. Though Netanyahu’s coalition is relatively secure, the expectations of the Prime Minister’s extremist allies are very high. A war with an indecisive outcome could be considered a victory for Palestinians, a notion that could alone break down the coalition. Though Netanyahu could launch war as a last resort, he has no need for such a risky option at the moment.

Second, the Palestinian Resistance is stronger than ever. On January 26, Hamas declared that it has used surface-to-air missiles to repel an Israeli air raid on Gaza. Though the Gaza group’s military arsenal is largely rudimentary, much of it homemade, it is far more advanced and sophisticated compared to weapons used during Israel’s so-called “Operation Cast Lead” in 2008.

Finally, Israel’s munition reserve must be at its lowest point in a long time. Now that the US, Israel’s largest weapons supplier, has tapped into its strategic weapons reserve – due to the Russia-Ukraine war – Washington will not be able to replenish the Israeli arsenal with constant supplies of munition the same way the Obama Administration did during the 2014 war. Even more alarming for the Israeli military, the New York Times revealed in January that “the Pentagon is tapping into a vast but little-known stockpile of American ammunition in Israel to help meet Ukraine’s dire need for artillery shells …”.

Though Israeli wars on Gaza are much riskier nowadays compared to the past, a cornered and embattled Netanyahu can still resort to such a scenario if he feels that his leadership is in peril. Indeed, the Israeli leader did so in May 2021. Even then, he still could not save himself or his government from a humiliating defeat.

حكومة نتنياهو السادسة: ائتلاف «عجائبي» غير مسبوق [2]

الأربعاء 11 كانون الثاني 2023

تبدو إسرائيل اليوم أقرب إلى جماعات منفصلة أو شبه منفصلة عن بعضها البعض (أ ف ب)

يحيى دبوق  

تسلّم ائتلاف بنيامين نتنياهو السادس السلطة في إسرائيل، ليعلن أقطابه، بصراحة ووضوح، أنهم سيسعون لتحقيق مصالح فئات وجماعات على حساب أخرى، ما يعني أن هذه الحكومة لن تكون لكلّ مُواطنيها، ليس ربطاً بالتناقض التقليدي بين فلسطينيّي الداخل واليهود فحسب، بل اتّصالاً باليهود أنفسهم، الذين ستتعمّق انقساماتهم وتتزايد، مع ما يفتح عليه ذلك من سيناريوات «سوداوية». في العادة المتّبَعة لدى تداول السلطة في دولة الاحتلال، يعلن المسؤولون المنتخَبون الجدد أنهم سيعملون على تحقيق مصالح كلّ المواطنين أفراداً وجماعات، ممّن صوّتوا أو لم يصوّتوا لهم، أمّا في الحالة الحاضرة، فانشغل نتنياهو بالتأكيد، حتى قبل الإعلان عن الاتفاقات الائتلافية، أنه سيعمل على إرضاء فئات بعيْنها، في مقابل تَحقّق هدفه الرئيس المتمثّل في الإفلات من المحاكمة والبقاء على المسرح السياسي. على أن سياسة «أنا ومِن بَعدي الطوفان» لم تَعُد منحصرةً في ما بين معسكرَين مختلفَين في الرؤى والبرامج السياسية والاقتصادية، بل تعدّتهما لتَحضر داخل الائتلاف نفسه: فـ«الحريديم» مثلاً منقسمون ما بين شرقيين وغربيين، ومتباينون مع المتديّنين القوميين حول إقامة الدولة نفسها والولاء لها؛ وهؤلاء الأخيرون غير موحَّدين بسبب تضارب تطلّعاتهم الشخصية وتسابقهم على إثبات صدارتهم في التطرّف؛ وأمّا العلمانيون فمشغولون في التصارع على المناصب لتحسين مكانتهم وحضورهم داخل حزب «الليكود»، تمهيداً للمعركة اللاحقة على خلافة رئيسه نتنياهو.

هكذا، تبدو إسرائيل أقرب إلى جماعات منفصلة أو شبه منفصلة عن بعضها، تسعى كلّ منها إلى استحصال ما أمكنها في ظلّ حكومة نتنياهو، بما يشمل مطالب من شأنها الإضرار بـ«الدولة ونسيجها العام وحوكمتها». وبات أكثر من نصف الجمهور اليهودي، بالفعل، يستشعر قلقاً من أن تستغلّ الحكومة الجديدة تسلّمها السلطة لإطاحة النظام القائم، والدفع بنظام بديل قائم على التعصّب والفاشية والمصالح الشخصية والاستبداد والأحكام التلمودية، والتثمين المفرط للذات بالاستناد إلى اعتقاد بالتفوّق والتفرّد و«حبّ الإله الخاص» لجماعاته اليهودية، وتفضيله إيّاها على الجماعات الأخرى الدونية والهامشية. ومن هنا، يبدو ذلك القلق مبرَّراً، خصوصاً أن من يتوعّدون بتلك الإجراءات يمتلكون القدرة على تنفيذها، لكن هل يكفي اجتماع النيّة والسلطة لتمكينهم ممّا يريدون؟ الإجابة هنا ليست قاطعة، بل غير مرجَّحة.

عام 1977، طرأ تغيّر كبير على الحياة السياسية الإسرائيلية، تَمثّل في انتقال حزب «الليكود» اليميني من المعارضة إلى السلطة، وتسلّم مناحيم بيغن هذه الأخيرة، وسيطرته ومعسكره على «الكنيست» حيث تستولد إسرائيل قوانينها. آنذاك، وكما هو الحال الآن، عبّر نصف الجمهور الإسرائيلي عن قلقه من وصول متطرّفين إلى مراكز القرار، وصولاً إلى وصْف هؤلاء بـ«الفاشية المتسلّطة» التي ستعمل على ضرب حزب «العمل» وشركائه، والتوجّه المعتدل والوسطي واليساري، وكذلك النُّخب الإسرائيلية على اختلافها. لكن سرعان ما اتّضح أن بيغن أكثر ليبرالية ممّن سبقوه؛ إذ حافظ على قواعد اللعبة الداخلية، كما صان مؤسّسة القضاء ومنَع زعزعة مكانتها وقدرتها على ضبْط اللعبة السياسية، بل إنه استطاع فعْل ما عجز عنه حزب «العمل» تاريخياً، عبر تحييد مصر عن الصراع العربي – الإسرائيلي.

على أن حكومة إسرائيل الحالية قد تكون مختلفة، بل قد لا يمكن تشبيهها بأيّ من الحكومات السابقة. وفي هذا، يُشار إلى الآتي:
– كان قرار حكومة بيغن في ذلك الوقت، «ليكودياً» بحتاً، مع إسناد من جانب الشركاء الذين اكتفوا بفُتات المصالح في المقابل. أمّا اليوم، فإن نتنياهو هو الذي يمثّل موضع ابتزاز، فيما حلفاؤه بأيديهم أوراق قوّة تتعلّق بمصيره السياسي، وربّما الشخصي أيضاً، ما يدفعه إلى التضحية بمصالح كبرى لـ«النفاد بجِلده».

– في الموازاة، لم تَعُد «الصهيونية الدينية» التي كانت ممثَّلة في عهد بيغن في حزب «المفدال»، تعبيراً عن قطاع ضيّق في الحلبة السياسية، يمكن تجاوز إرادته وتطلّعاته، بل باتت مكوّناً حاسماً لديه القدرة على إسقاط الحكومة في حال قرّر الانسحاب منها.

 كذلك، كان «الحريديم»، الذين تَمثّلوا في عهد بيغن بأربعة مقاعد فحسب، على هامش اللعبة السياسية، وجلّ ما طالبوا به حينذاك هو التملّص من الخدمة في الجيش الإسرائيلي، بينما اليوم يمتلكون حصّة وازنة في «الكنيست» قادرة على إطاحة الائتلاف، كما استحصلوا على مطالب كانت بالنسبة إليهم حلماً في السابق، إلى الحدّ الذي باتوا معه يطالبون بفرض نمط حياتهم التلمودية على الآخر اليهودي في إسرائيل.

لم تَعُد «الصهيونية الدينية» كما كانت في عهد بيغن، تعبيراً عن قطاع ضيّق في الحلبة السياسية


– تلقّف بيغن، في حينه، مبادرة الرئيس المصري الراحل، أنور السادات، ليتوصّلا إلى تسوية شملت الانسحاب من شبه جزيرة سيناء، وهو ما أثار «الصهيونية الدينية» التي كانت عاجزة عن فعل أيّ شيء مضادّ. أمّا حالياً، فهي تمنع مجرّد الحديث عن مفاوضات مع الفلسطينيين ولو شكلية، فيما تتطلّع إلى إسقاط اتّفاقات سابقة تمهيداً لضمّ الضفة الغربية كاملة إلى إسرائيل، وطرْد الفلسطينيين منها.

– تمسَّك بيغن بمكانة القضاء الإسرائيلي، بوصفه حَكَماً يجب الامتثال لقراراته، حتى وإنْ عمد إلى إبطال قوانين واجراءات تنفيذية. كما أبقى صلاحيات المستشارين القانونيين في الوزارات والمؤسّسات على حالها، في حين أن نتنياهو وشركاءه يتطلّعون إلى إضعاف القضاء، لا فقط تمكيناً للأوّل من إسقاط محاكمته، بل أيضاً تيسيراً أمام الأخيرين لفرْض إرادتهم عبر قوانين وأنظمة، لن تتمكّن المحكمة العليا من إلغائها، حتى وإن كانت تعبيراً عن عنصرية فجّة وتغليب للمصالح الشخصية أو الفئوية، بما لا يستثني اليهود أنفسهم وعلاقاتهم البينية.

على رغم ما تَقدّم، يَصعب، من الآن، تقدير ما إن كانت حكومة نتنياهو ستتمكّن من تحقيق ما تتطلّع إليه، وبالتالي يتعذّر أيضاً تقدير مآلاتها المحتملة وتأثير سقوطها أو بقائها على إسرائيل. لكن الأكيد أن هذه الحكومة تطمح إلى نقل دولة الاحتلال إلى تموضع وهوية مغايرَين وسياسة اجتماعية مختلفة عمّا هو قائم حالياً، الأمر الذي يمثّل مكمن التهديد الأكبر والأشمل للكيان العبري.

من ملف : أسرى فلسطين: حرب إلغاء الوجود

فيديوات ذات صلة

مقالات ذات صلة

حكومة نتنياهو السادسة: هجينٌ مفخَّخ [1]

الإثنين 9 كانون الثاني 2023

يحيى دبوق  

ستظهّر حكومة نتنياهو غلَبة المصالح الشخصية والقبَلية للأفراد والجماعات على حساب «الدولة الجامعة» (أ ف ب)

ليست حكومة بنيامين نتنياهو السادسة مشابهةً لأيّ حكومة سابقة في إسرائيل. هي خليط هجين من الفاشيين والمتعصّبين دينياً واليمينيين المتطرّفين، الذين استطاعوا من خلال استغلال حاجة نتنياهو إليهم للنجاة بنفسه، انتزاع مساحات وصلاحيات واسعة لهم. تغوّلٌ ستكون له بلا ريب انعكاسات غير «طيّبة» على «أمن» إسرائيل ومصالحها و«حوكمتها بناءً على مأسسة قانونية». في ما يلي الحلقة الأولى من سلسلة تتناول هوية هذه الحكومة وتناقضاتها والأزمات التي يُتوقّع أن يجرّها أداؤها والسيناريوات المحتمَلة لمصيرها

بعد أكثر من عام قضاها رئيساً للمعارضة، عاد بنيامين نتنياهو ليرأس المؤسّسة السياسية في إسرائيل، إثر نجاحه في تشكيل حكومته السادسة، التي تُعدّ الأكثر تطرّفاً وعنصرية منذ قيام الدولة العبرية عام 1948، لِما تحويه من خليط من الفاشيين والمتعصّبين دينياً واليمينيين. وسيكون من شأن هذه الحكومة أن تتسبّب لإسرائيل بتهديدات، تُضاف إلى التهديدات القائمة وتُعمّقها، ليس في ما يتعلّق بالخارج حيث تتعاظم الأخطار وتتشعّب فقط، بل وأيضاً في الداخل ربطاً بما تسمّى «القبائل الإسرائيلية» والتعايش في ما بينها، حيث التصارع على هوية الدولة والعلاقة بالآخر، سواء اليهودي أو غير اليهودي.

لا يعني ما تَقدّم أن حكومة نتنياهو ستتسبّب بزوال إسرائيل، أو بـ«ثورة» داخلية تنهي طابع «الدولة» الحالي من حيث التعايش بين مكوّناتها اليهودية – وصولاً إلى «حرب أهلية» وفقاً لِما يَصدر من تحذيرات على لسان كبار المسؤولين الإسرائيليين -، أو أنها ستؤدّي إلى عزل تل أبيب وقطْعها عن حليفها الأميركي والغربي، بل إن من شأنها أن تظهّر غلَبة المصالح الشخصية والقبَلية للأفراد والجماعات على حساب «الدولة الجامعة» لهم. هي إذاً حالة تجلية لواقع موجود سلفاً، وليس خلْق له، جرى استبعاده من دائرة الاهتمام الجمعي في إسرائيل، نتيجة أوّليةِ التهديدات الوجودية التي تَجمع ولا تفرّق. في المقابل، تَبرز المؤسّستان العسكرية والأمنية بوصْفهما «العاقل الوحيد» الذي يراهَن عليه لمنع الإضرار بـ«الدولة»، في ما يمثّل مفارقة قد لا يوجد مثيل لها حول العالم، حيث اتّجاهات العسكر على الأغلب متطرّفة؛ ذلك أن مَن يملك مطرقة، كما يَرد في المثل الإنكليزي، يرى كلّ شيء أمامه مسامير، فيما مهمّة الساسة هي بلورة رؤى وقرارات بناءً على الصورة الأوسع والمعطيات الأشمل والأكثر تعقّلاً. أمّا الحالة في إسرائيل الآن، فمعكوسة، والسبب أن نتنياهو عمَد إلى اقتناص فرصة الفوز في الانتخابات، نتيجة أخطاء المعسكر المعارض له وتناقضاته وإعلائه مصالحه، من أجل تمكين وضعه، علماً أن مَن انتخبوا معارضيه أكبر عدداً ممّن انتخبوا معسكره، وهو ما لم ينعكس في النتائج بفعل تقنيات اللعبة الانتخابية ومقدّماتها، والتي يَصعب تكرارها في حال تَقرّر التوجّه إلى انتخابات مبكرة جديدة. من هنا، وبما أن المصلحة الشخصية لدى نتنياهو هي الغالبة، وتحديداً ما يتعلّق بمنع استمرار محاكمته في قضايا فساد ورشى، فقد كان ملزَماً بأن يشكّل حكومة «كيفما كان»، فيما حلفاؤه من اليمين المتطرّف والفاشيين والأحزاب الدينية (الحريديم) أدركوا حاجته هذه، فعمدوا إلى الإفراط في مطالبهم.

قَبل نتنياهو الابتزاز وخضع له، لتأتي حكومته السادسة عجائبيّة وهجينة وخليطاً من التناقضات ومخالِفة للقوانين


قَبل نتنياهو الابتزاز وخضع له، لتأتي حكومته السادسة عجائبيّة وهجينة وخليطاً من التناقضات ومخالِفة للقوانين والأنظمة التي عمل على تغييرها. فوزير الداخلية، الذي سيكون لاحقاً وزيراً للمالية، متّهم ومسجون في قضايا فساد وتهرب ضريبي وتلقّي رشى، فيما وزير الأمن القومي، المسؤول عن الشرطة وفرض القانون، كان ملاحقاً بتهم حضّ على الكراهية وعلى الإرهاب. أمّا الوزير المسؤول عن الإدارة المدنية في المناطق الفلسطينية المحتلّة، والمعنيّ بكلّ جوانب حياة الفلسطينيين، فهو صاحب رؤية مسيحانية تلمودية تَنظر إلى الفلسطينيين وغير اليهود عامة، ككائنات دونية ذات حقوق محدودة، بما فيها الوجود نفسه. هكذا، آثر نتنياهو أولوية بقائه في السلطة رئيساً للوزراء – وإنْ سقطت الحكومة نتيجة تناقضاتها – في الفترات الانتقالية بين العمليات الانتخابية، والتي يتعذّر التقدير ما إنْ كانت ستسفر عن نتائج حاسمة في هذا الاتجاه أو ذاك. هل هذه هي «ورقة الأمان» التي يسعى إليها زعيم «الليكود» بعد التخلّص من المحاكمة بتهم الفساد، ما يعني تغيّر الحال في اليوم الذي يلي، وانتفاء حاجته إلى شركائه؟ سؤال لا يفارق طاولة التقديرات، وإنْ كانت إجابته الآن متعذّرة. وفي الانتظار، يمكن إيراد الملاحظات الآتية:

– في النصف الأوّل من ولاية الحكومة، سيكون رئيس حزب «الصهيونية الدينية»، بتسلئيل سموتريتش، وزيراً للمالية ووزيراً في وزارة الأمن (الدفاع) التي سيتقاسمها مع يوآف غالنت، من «الليكود». كذلك، جرى تعيين رئيس حزب «شاس»، آرييه درعي، وزيراً للداخلية ووزيراً للصحة. وفي النصف الثاني من ولاية الحكومة، أي بعد عامين، سيحلّ سموتريتش محلّ درعي في «الداخلية»، لكنه سيستمرّ في منصبه في وزارة الأمن وزيراً ثانياً فيها. وفيما سيستمرّ درعي وزيراً للصحة، فهو سيتولّى أيضاً وزارة المالية، التي يتسلّمها من سموتريتش.

– انتزع زعيم حزب «قوة يهودية»، إيتامار بن غفير (الذي يتولى وزارة الأمن القوميّ)، وسموتريتش أجزاء كبيرة من السلطة على الجيش الإسرائيلي ومن وزارة الأمن نفسها. وبينما نُقلت الإدارة المدنية وتنسيق أعمال الحكومة في المناطق المحتلّة (الضفة الغربية) إلى سموتريتش، نُقلت مسؤولية كتائب «حرس الحدود» في الضفة من الجيش إلى بن غفير. كما نُقلت صلاحية تعيين كبير الحاخامات العسكرية إلى الجيش بدلاً من رئيس هيئة الأركان، في حين أصبح جهاز فرض القانون المتعلّق بالمخالفات البيئية والزراعية من نصيب «الأمن القومي» عوضاً عن «البيئة».

– تقسيم الصلاحيات هذا سيكون من شأنه الإضرار بالأمن الإسرائيلي، خصوصاً أن مَن يخرق القوانين، حتى الشكلية منها، بات هو الذي يقرّر ويَحكم وينفّذ في الأراضي المحتلّة. إذ أضحت وحدات من الجيش، تابعة للمنطقة الوسطى بطبيعتها، تتلقّى أوامرها مباشرة من غير الجيش، فيما يجري تعيين المسؤولين في الإدارة المدنية التابعة تقليدياً للمؤسسة العسكرية، من قِبل جهات من خارج هذه الأخيرة.

في بقية الوزارات، عمد نتنياهو إلى إرضاء أقطاب في حزبه، عبر توليفة من شأنها منع الاستقرار المطلوب. إذ سيكون إيلي كوهين وزيراً للخارجية، وإسرائيل كاتس وزيراً للطاقة لمدّة عام، وبعد ذلك سيتبادلان المناصب لمدّة عامين. وفي السنة الرابعة، سيعاودان التبادل لمدّة عام واحد. مع ذلك، سحب نتنياهو من «الخارجية» أقساماً مهمّة، بما من شأنه تقليص قدرتها على رسم وتحقيق سياسة خارجية ناجعة. إذ ثمّة ثلاث جهات ستنافس:
كوهين في العلاقات الخارجية، وهي من حصة رئيس الوزراء، ومستشار الأمن القومي تساحي هنغبي، ووزير الشؤون الإستراتيجية رون ديرمر. أمّا موضوع التعامل مع المقاطعة فسيذهب إلى وزير الشتات، عميحاي شكلي. كما أن صلاحيات أخرى انتُزعت أيضاً من «الخارجية»، وأُعطيت لوزير الشؤون الاستراتيجية، رون ديرمر، فيما وزارتا الشتات والأديان ومكاتب وأجهزة الهجرة والاستيعاب، فستشارك «الخارجية» في جزء من الصلاحيات، ما سيحوّلها إلى حقيبة هامشية.

ما تَقدّم عيّنات من مقايضات أقدَمَ عليها نتنياهو، ستدفع ثمنها إسرائيل من «أمنها ومصالحها وحوكمتها بناءً على مأسسة قانونية»، فيما المستوطنون سيكونون هم مَن يقرّرون صحّة أو خطأ أفعالهم، أي أن خصم الفلسطينيين المباشر سيكون هو الحَكم ومنفّذ الحُكم أيضاً.

مقالات ذات صلة

Ilan Pappe on the Socio-Political Formations behind Israel’s Neo-Zionist Government

January 6, 2023

A cabinet meeting of the new Israeli government. (Photo: Prime Minister of Israel’s TW Page)
– Ilan Pappé is a professor at the University of Exeter. He was formerly a senior lecturer in political science at the University of Haifa. He is the author of The Ethnic Cleansing of Palestine, The Modern Middle East, A History of Modern Palestine: One Land, Two Peoples, and Ten Myths about Israel. Pappé is described as one of Israel’s ‘New Historians’ who, since the release of pertinent British and Israeli government documents in the early 1980s, have been rewriting the history of Israel’s creation in 1948. He contributed this article to The Palestine Chronicle.

By Ilan Pappe

Two months after the election of the new government of Israel, the blurred picture is becoming more transparent, and it seems one can offer some more informed insights about its composition, personalities, and possible future policies and reaction to them.

It would not be an exaggeration to define Benjamin Netanyahu as the least extreme member of this government, which tells you about the personalities and policies of all the others.  

There are three major groups in the government, and I am not referring here to various political parties, but rather to socio-political formations.

Zionization of Ultra-Orthodox Jews

In the first group are the ultra-orthodox Jews, both the European and Arab Jews orthodoxies. What characterizes them is the process of Zionization they underwent since 1948. 

From a marginal role in politics, only for the sake of their communities, they belong now to the captains of this new state. From being moderate and adhering to sacred Jewish precepts that do not allow Jewish sovereignty in the Holy Land, they now emulate the Israeli secular right: supporting colonization in the West Bank, the siege on the Gaza Strip, employing racist discourse towards the Palestinians where they are, advocating harsh and aggressive policies and, at the same time, trying to take over the public space and Judaize it, according to their own strict version of Judaism.

The only exception is Neturei Karata, loyal to their long-term anti-Zionism and solidarity with the Palestinians.

National Religious Jews

In the second group are the national religious Jews, mostly living in colonies, on expropriated Palestinian land in the West Bank, and recently creating “learning centers” of settlers in the midst of mixed Arab-Jews towns in Israel.

They support both the criminal policies of the Israeli army and the actions by settler vigilantes that harass Palestinians, uprooting their orchards, shooting at them, and disputing their way of life. 

Their aim is to give both the army and these vigilantes a freer hand in oppressing the occupied West Bank, with the hope of pressuring more Palestinians to leave. This group is also the backbone of the Israeli secret service command and dominates the cadre of senior officers in the army. 

The two groups mentioned so far share the wish to impose stricter apartheid inside Israel against the 48 Arabs and, at the same time, begin a crusade against the LGBT community while demanding a more strict marginalization of women in the public space.

They also share a messianic vision and they believe they are now in a position to implement it. At the center of this vision is the Judaization of sacred sites that are now “still” Islamic or Christian. The most coveted site is Haram al-Sharif. 

The first precursor was the provocative visit by the Minister of National Security Itamar Ben Gvir to the Haram. The next step will come on Passover, with an attempt to fully invade the Haram with Jewish prayers and ministers. Similar actions will be taken in Nablus, Hebron, and Bethlehem. How far they will go is difficult to predict. 

Marginalization of Likud’s Secular Jews

The second group also has representatives in the major party of the government, the Likud. But most of the Likud members are part of a third socio-political group: the secular Jews who are also adhering to traditional Jewish practices. 

They try to distinguish themselves by claiming that economic and political liberalism is still an important pillar in the Likud’s political platform. Netanyahu used to be one of them but now seems to desert them when it comes to dividing the spoils, namely marginalizing them in the government. He needs the others more than his own party, to avoid trial and remain in power.

The Zionist Project

The prominent members of all these groups arrived with pre-prepared legislation initiatives and policies: all of them, without any exception, are meant to allow an extreme right-wing government to dispense of whatever has remained of the charade called the Israeli democracy.

The first initiative already began, sterilizing the judicial system in such a way that it could not, if it ever wished to, defend the rights of minorities in general or that of the Palestinians more specifically.

To be honest, all the previous Israeli governments were informed by this overall disregard for the civil and human rights of Palestinians. This is just a phase of making it more constitutional, more mainstream, and more apparent, without any attempt to hide the aim behind it: to have as much historical Palestine as possible with as few Palestinians in it as possible.

However, if this materializes in the future, it will take Israel further into its neo-Zionist destiny; namely, the truthful fulfillment and maturation of the Zionist project: a ruthless settler colonial project, built on apartheid, ethnic cleansing, occupation, colonization and genocidal policies. 

A project that, so far, escaped any significant rebuke from the Western world and one which is tolerated by the rest of the world, even if it is censured and rejected by many in the global civil society. So far, it is only due to Palestinian resistance and resilience that it failed to be triumphant.

End of ‘Fantasy Israel’

This new reality brings to the fore a series of questions, that one has to ask, even if at the moment we cannot answer them. 

Will the Arab and Muslim governments, which only recently joined the immunization of this travesty, realize that it is not too late to change course?

Will new governments of the Left, such as the one elected in Brazil, be able to lead the way for a change of attitude from above that would reflect democratically the one that is demanded from below?

And will Jewish communities be shocked enough to wake up from the “fantasy Israel” dream and realize the danger of present-day Israel, not only to Palestinians but to Jews and Judaism as well?

These are questions that are not easy to answer. What we can stress is, once more, a call for Palestinian unity so as to enhance the struggle against this government and the ideology it represents.  Such unity would become a compass for a powerful global front that is already there, thanks to the BDS movement, and is willing to continue its work of solidarity and enhance it further and wider: galvanizing governments, as well as societies, and bringing back Palestine to the center of global attention.

The three components of the new Israeli government did not always coexist easily; so there is also a possibility of an earlier political collapse since all in all we are talking about a group of incompetent politicians when it comes to running such an intricate economy as the Israeli one. Probably, they will not be able to arrest the high inflation, rise in prices, and swelling unemployment. 

However, even if this is going to happen, there isn’t an alternative fourth socio-political group that can lead Israel. So, a new government would be formed by another combination of the same forces, with the same intent and policies. 

We should treat this as a structural challenge, not a one-off, and prepare for a long struggle, based on even more enhanced international solidarity and tighter Palestinian unity. 

This rogue government, and what it represents, will not be there forever; we should do all we can to shorten the wait for its replacement with a much better alternative not only for the Palestinians but also for the Jews, and everyone else that resides in historical Palestine. 

Sayyed Nasrallah: Hezbollah eradicated curse of US from Lebanon

November 11, 2022

Source: Al Mayadeen

By Al Mayadeen English 

Hezbollah Secretary-General Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah underlines that the resistance foiled the US and Israeli plans for chaos in Lebanon.

Hezbollah Secretary-General Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah Video

    The operation carried out by freedom fighter Ahmad Qasir kickstarted the first stage of liberation from the Israeli occupation in Lebanon, Hezbollah Secretary-General Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah said on Friday during a speech commemorating Hezbollah’s Martyr Day.

    “Qasir’s operation shocked the enemy and led to the collapse of all Israeli aspirations and dreams of bringing Lebanon into the Israeli age,” Sayyed Nasrallah said, praising the Lebanese resistance fighter for his courage and pivotal operation that was a milestone in Lebanon’s path toward liberation.

    “Hezbollah undertook this grand occasion as Martyrs Day, though every day is martyrs day, and we consider any martyr in the axis of resistance, in Iraq, Yemen, or Syria, as our martyrs,” the Lebanese resistance leader said.

    “Our [resistance] journey not once stopped resulting in martyrs throughout [the] 40 years [since the founding of Hezbollah], and 98% of them are youth,” Sayyed Nasrallah added, hoping that any resistance faction carries out an operation as big or even bigger than Qasir’s.

    “The martyrs’ families have had a tremendous role in upholding the journey over the past 40 years,” he said, lauding how they encouraged their sons to fight against the occupation and supported their delve into freedom fighting.

    “The sons of martyrs became freedom fighters and leaders, and this is all due to their families committing to resistance until victory… We appreciate the martyrs that sacrificed themselves for our sanctities, countries, freedom, dignity, and security,” the leader underlined.

    “Our martyrs are known, and while some of their bodies are still held by the Israeli enemy, which is denying having them to begin with, we do not leave the bodies of our martyrs and missing persons behind,” Sayyed Nasrallah stressed.

    The martyrs’ journey, according to Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah, highlights the enemy’s failure to achieve its goals. “The enemy is betting on the second and third generations abandoning resistance, therefore it is trying to target and spoil them.”

    “The enemy, through advanced techniques, is trying to spoil our upcoming generations and change their ideologies, which poses a grave danger,” he said. “The enemy was surprised in occupied Palestine where its aspirations to influence the upcoming generations and make them change their principles failed.”

    Israeli election to increase divide

    The Hezbollah chief commented on the Israeli Knesset election results, condemning all Israeli governments as criminal regardless of who wins the election.

    “The results of the latest Israeli election are of no concern to us because all Israeli parties are alike in their criminality,” he added. “The Israeli elections might have grave repercussions in Palestine, because idiots will take the wheel, and idiots do not scare us.”

    “The Israeli elections will increase the divide and influence the future of this entity through the choices it is taking,” Sayyed Nasrallah said.

    Israeli Likud party chief Benjamin Netanyahu obtained the support of 64 Knesset members, Israeli media said on Thursday, noting that he would be assigned to form the Israeli government.

    This comes after the victory of the pro-Netanyahu camp in the Knesset elections, which took place on the first of November.

    Regarding the demarcation of the Lebanese maritime borders, Sayyed Nasrallah underlined that the people betting on the guarantees provided by the United States should look to the Palestinians that trusted the US guarantees on their accords, “but for us, the status quo that led to the agreement will remain present.”

    “Lebanon is protected by God and by the established equation of strength, which is ‘army, people, and resistance’. This will not change after the Israeli elections, for our strength is still present,” Sayyed Nasrallah said.

    “Washington did not complete the maritime border agreement for Lebanon’s sake, but rather to avert war in the region because it has different priorities,” Sayyed Nasrallah said.

    US source of plague

    Similarly, Sayyed Nasrallah said the results of the US elections would not change anything because the Republicans and Democrats are two faces of the same coin.

    In response to the statements of the United States Assistant Secretary of State for Near Eastern Affairs Barabara Leaf, who said Hezbollah represented a “plague in Lebanon” for many years, Sayyed Nasrallah said: “Hezbollah eradicated the curse of the United States from Lebanon, killing this plague.”

    “The United States is the cause of this curse, plague, and pandemic, and it is sneaking in everywhere all over again and committing massacres after our peoples confronted its curse and plague,” Sayyed Nasrallah stressed.

    “The United States brought the terrorist takfiri plague to Lebanon, and Hezbollah confronted and eradicated it,” he added. “The United States wanted chaos in Lebanon in 2019 though supporting the demonstrations after its plans were foiled.”

    “It is the United States that sponsored the chaos of October 2019 and planted its curse, which Hezbollah and the honorable people faced,” the resistance chief said. “The American blockade is still continuing on Lebanon by preventing any investments or economic aid to the country, and this itself is a curse and a plague.”

    “The US prevents any country from helping Lebanon,” he explained, highlighting that any country that grows courageous enough to break the American blockade and aid Lebanon, the United States will prevent the government from taking the assistance.

    “Will Lebanon dare accept the new assistance from Russia, or will it bow down to the US pressures?” Sayyed Nasrallah asked. “Iran agreed to the request of a Lebanese delegation that visited it to help Lebanon, but the American curse prevented the aid [from reaching Lebanon.”

    Sayyed Nasrallah called on the Lebanese people not to kneel before the US plague, especially as the United States seeks nothing but protection for “Israel”.

    An honest president

    Touching on Lebanon’s internal affairs, Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah said the presidential vacuum had many connotations in Lebanon, “but the vacuum cannot be filled by whoever.”

    “The presidency is a sensitive and pivotal matter for Lebanon that will leave its mark for the six years of the term and beyond,” he explained. “Therefore, we must have the most optimal pick for president.”

    “We do not want a president who would provide a cover for the resistance, because it does not need protection. We want a president who would not stab the resistance in the back,” the Hezbollah chief stressed.

    “The resistance was safe throughout President Michel Aoun’s tenure. We want a brave man who does not get scared and who cannot be bought or sold,” Sayyed Nasrallah noted.

    “The resistance is one of the most important elements of power in Lebanon, and it is targeted, especially by the Americans that are still seeking chaos.”

    “The Americans publicly affirm that they support the Lebanese army, which they consider qualified to confront the resistance,” he noted, though he went on to voice “the resistance’s confidence in the Lebanese army and its leadership, which rejects any confrontation with the resistance.”

    “The US embassy is interfering in the smallest governmental and ministerial details in Lebanon […] the resistance, as a large part of the Lebanese people, wants a president that reassures the resistance.”

    Related Videos

    Related Stories

    Jordan Warns Netanyahu Of Diplomatic Pitfalls If Al-Aqsa Status Quo Changed

    Nov 08 2022

    By Staff, Agencies

    Jordan warned that bilateral ties with the Zionist entity will suffer if the incoming ruling coalition tries to change the holy al-Aqsa Mosque status quo.

    The warning, reported by an ‘Israeli’ public broadcaster, underlined the potential diplomatic pitfalls awaiting Likud leader Benjamin Netanyahu who plans to form a cabinet with far-right hardliners.

    “Any attempt to change the status quo on the Temple Mount will definitely harm ties between Jordan and ‘Israel,’” the broadcaster quoted an unnamed Jordanian source, referring to al-Aqsa Mosque compound.

    The source took specific aim at Itamar Ben Gvir, head of the extremist Otzma Yehudit party and a crucial partner in the ruling coalition, who has made a point of touring the site during times of increased tensions.

    Ben Gvir and others in his party are longtime and well-known advocates of unlawful Jewish prayer rights at al-Aqsa Mosque. The Jordanian source warned that visits by Ben Gvir and his other “provocations” would be a whole different story if he does so as a minister.

    Jordan’s ruling Hashemite family has been the sole custodian of the Muslim and Christian holy sites in East al-Quds, including al-Aqsa Mosque, since 1924.

    Under the mosque status quo, only Muslims are allowed to worship within the compound while non-Muslims may visit the site, but are not allowed to pray there.

    Al-Quds-based Islamic Endowment [Waqf] has repeatedly denounced the tours of Zionist settlers to al-Aqsa Mosque as provocative, stressing that Palestinian worshipers and guards at the mosque feel insecure in the presence of trigger-happy ‘Israeli’ troops and settlers.

    Last May, frequent acts of violence against Palestinian worshipers at al-Aqsa Mosque led to an 11-day war between Palestinian resistance groups in the besieged Gaza Strip and the Zionist occupation regime, during which the ‘Israeli’ military killed at least 260 Palestinians, including 66 children.

    Netanyahu who served as the Zionist regime’s prime minister from 2009 to 2021, has won elections despite standing charges of corruption and political dysfunction. Netanyahu and his right-wing allies are about to form the most extremist regime in the history of the occupation entity.

    During Netanyahu’s term as prime minister, ties with Amman hit a low point.

    Last year, Jordan refused to give Netanyahu permission to overfly the country for a diplomatic visit in retaliation after Jordan’s crown prince was unable to visit al-Aqsa Mosque.

    اليمين يثبّت فوزه: إسرائيل أكثر انقساماً

    لم تبدّل النتائج شبه النهائية للانتخابات الإسرائيلية، شيئاً كثيراً في خريطة «الكنيست الـ 25»، إذ حافظ معسكر اليمين برئاسة بنيامين نتنياهو على تفوّقه، بما سيخوّله نيْل تكليف تشكيل الحكومة. وعلى رغم هذا التفوّق، إلّا أن التدقيق في الأرقام والمعطيات يُظهر أن الانقسام داخل المجتمع الإسرائيلي لا يزال كبيراً، وأن عناوين ذلك الانقسام أشدّ عمقاً وأخطر دلالةً من معادلة موالاة نتنياهو أو معارضته، والتي تسيّدت المشهد طوال السنوات الأخيرة. وإذ بدأ التداول في الكيان في ما ينوي الائتلاف الحكومي العتيد فعله، فإن القضية الأبرز التي تشغل المحلّلين هي احتمال سعي اليمين الجديد إلى تحجيم قوّة المحكمة العليا والنيابة العامة، فيما بدأ تيار «الصهيونية الدينية» يسنّ أسنانه لتولّي حقائب حسّاسة من أجل إنفاذ تطلّعاته إلى التضييق على فلسطينيي الداخل والضفة الغربية المحتلّة، وهو ما لا يبدو ميسّراً بالنسبة إليه، وخصوصاً في ظلّ الموقف الأميركي المتحفّظ على التعامل مع هذا التيار. وفيما لا تزال صورة المواقف الخارجية من الحدث الإسرائيلي غير واضحة تماماً، فالظاهر أن دول التطبيع الجديد أو المزمَع لن تجد صعوبةً في التعامل مع نتنياهو، ولا سيما أن الأخير هو مَن وُقّعت في عهده «اتفاقيات آبراهام»، لكن هذا قد لا يكون هو الحال بالنسبة إلى الأردن، الذي لم تَظهر علاقته بزعيم «الليكود» لدى تولّي الأخير رئاسة الحكومة، في أحسن أحوالها

    القضاء هدف أوّل لليمين: عودة نتنياهو لا تَردم الانقسام

    تتجاوز الانتخابات العامّة في كيان العدو مجرّد كونها مناسبة لاختيار ممثّلي الجمهور الإسرائيلي، كما هي الحال في أيّ نظام يعتمد هذه الآلية، بل أصبحت هذه الانتخابات، بفعل مجموعة من التحوّلات الداخلية،…

    علي حيدر

    بن غفير يكبّر طموحاته: أنا سيّد البيت!

    في أعقاب الإنجاز المشهود الذي حقّقته «الصهيونية الدينية» في انتخابات «الكنيست الـ25»، بحصولها على 14 مقعداً، يمنّي زعيم حزب «عظمة يهودية»، المنتمي إلى هذا المعسكر، إيتمار بن غفير، نفسه بأن يصبح…

    بيروت حمود

    غزة غير مبالية: إنّما هو عدوّ واحد

    غزة | لم تأخذ نتائج الانتخابات الإسرائيلية مساحة الاهتمام المعتادة في الشارع الغزّي. ظَهر فوز بنيامين نتنياهو كـ«تريند» تَصدّر مواقع التواصل الاجتماعي لساعات، ثمّ غاب كأنّ «الحريق» الإسرائيلي الداخلي…

    يوسف فارس

    أربعة شهداء في الضفة والقدس: غزة تلوّح بصواريخها

    قبل يومَين فقط من موعد زفافه، وحين تواجُده في ملحمة مُشرفاً على تجهيز الذبائح ليوم الزفاف، اغتالت قوات الاحتلال الإسرائيلي الشاب الفلسطيني، فاروق سلامة (28 سنة)، برصاصات أصابتْه في البطن والصدر…

    الأخبار

    مقالات متعلقة

    Israeli Coalition Loses Majority as Yamina MK Quits Government

     April 6, 2022

    Israeli MK Idit Silman at the Knesset (photo from January 2022).

    Israeli government began to crumble on Wednesday after Yamina MK and the coalition whip Idit Silman announced her resignation from the government, Israeli media reported.

    With this, Prime Minister Naftali Bennett’s government loses its majority in Knesset, leaving it neck-and-neck with the opposition at 60-60. If an additional person were to leave the coalition, the government could be brought down in a law brought by the Opposition that would disperse the Knesset, The Jerusalem Post reported.

    Should the Opposition have a majority, they would be able to attempt to form a government without even needing to go to elections. The more coalition members that defect, the easier this option becomes for them.

    Silman said that she “could not take it anymore,” and that she could not continue undermining the so-called “Jewish identity of the State of Israel”, a reference to a disagreement she had with Health Minister Nitzan Horowitz over allowing chametz, forbidden foods during Passover, into hospitals over the Jewish holiday.

    Former PM Benjamin Netanyahu congratulated Silman on her decision, thanking her “in the name of many people in Israel that waited for this moment.”

    However, Labor MK Gilad Kariv said it was clear that the disagreement over the chametz was “not the real issue,” adding that the “government was always careful when it came to matters of religion and state. ”

    Silman ditched the coalition after she was reportedly offered the 10th spot in the Likud Party list in a future election and the position of Health Minister should the party – led by Netanyahu – successfully form an alternative government.

    Source: Israeli media

    Israeli Ambassador to the UK Evacuated from Event Amid Protests

    Nov 10, 2021

    By Al Mayadeen

    Israeli ambassador protest: LSE investigating threats against Tzipi  Hotovely - BBC News

    Source: Agencies

    Israeli ambassador to the UK, Tzipi Hotovely, was rushed out of the London School of Economics amid protests condemning her appearance.

    “Israel’s” ambassador to the UK, Tzipi Hotovely, was rushed out of an event at the London School of Economics Tuesday, as protests formed on campus condemning her appearance.

    Politics For All, a UK Political account on Twitter, posted a video of the evacuation, showing Hotovely being rushed out into a car as crowds chanted “shame on you!”

    Hotovely had been invited by the LSE’s student union to take part in a debate, sparking controversy, as pro-Palestine groups at the school accused the student union of giving a platform to racism.

    The Israeli occupation’s ambassador is a member of Benjamin Netanyahu’s Likud party and is a supporter of the occupation’s settler colonialist practices. She has also used Islamophic rhetoric on numerous occasions.

    No evidence to back up Israeli claims

    The occupation has also recently designated 6 Palestinian NGOs as “terrorist organizations,” sparking condemnation from various human rights groups and EU countries.

    Five European members of the UN Security Council revealed Tuesday their serious concerns over the Israeli move. France, Estonia, Ireland, Norway, and Albania released a joint statement on the matter.

    “Israel” has failed to provide evidence to convince European officials that the 6 NGOs were linked to the PFLP or “violent activities”, as they claimed.

    Related Videos

    Related Articles