Britain’s sickening infatuation with israel continues

Britain’s sickening infatuation with Israel continues


Iran still the victim of unshakable Israeli influence over the UK’s political establishment

By Stuart Littlewood

Here in the UK the Campaign Against the Arms Trade (CAAT) has initiated a judicial review in a bid to halt UK arms sales to Saudi Arabia on suspicion that they are being used against civilians in Yemen. The indiscriminate nature of Saudi air-strikes makes it highly likely that British weaponry is being deployed in breach of international humanitarian law.

The slaughter has been going on for nearly two years, leading to a humanitarian crisis of appalling magnitude and great cruelty. Since the Yemen campaign began the British government has granted export licences for more than £3.3 billions worth of war equipment when there was a “clear risk” that some of it would be used in violation of all norms of human conduct.

It is claimed that the government has ignored warnings by senior civil servants and its own arms control experts, and some records of expressed concern have gone missing. This is no great surprise when we discover that export licensing is overseen by none other than the secretary of state for international trade, Liam Fox. For Fox has “form” as a crazed stooge of Israel and a sworn enemy of Iran.

Fox, while secretary of state for defence, was quoted on the Conservative Friends of Israel website as saying:

… We must remember that in the battle for the values that we stand for, for democracy against theocracy, for democratic liberal values against repression – Israel’s enemies are our enemies and this is a battle in which we all stand together or we will all fall divided.

And in June 2015 Fox declared:

It is logical to assume that Iran’s intentions are to develop a nuclear weapons capability and any claims that its intentions are exclusively peaceful should not be regarded as credible… Iran’s nuclear intentions cannot be seen outside the context of its support for terror proxies, arguably the defining feature of its foreign policy. The risks are clear.

Fox was forced to resign as defence secretary in 2011 following scandalous goings-on between him, his “close friend” Adam Werritty, the UK ambassador to Israel and Israeli intelligence figures allegedly involved in plotting sanctions against Iran.

Liam Fox and his friend Adam Werritty

Liam Fox (left) and his friend Adam Werritty

Just lately, Prime Minister Theresa May has accused Iran of working with Hezbollah, interfering in Iraq, sending fighters to Syria to help Assad, and supporting the Houthis in the conflict in Yemen. The British government, of course, can meddle where it pleases and recently concluded another huge arms deal with the Saudis which, says Mrs May, is for the sake of long-term security in the Gulf. She argues that the same extremists who plot terror in the Gulf states are also targeting the streets of Europe: “Gulf security is our security.”

However, public pressure to end arms sales to Saudi Arabia is now so great that the government has adopted a new export licensing scheme that hides the value and scale of weaponry being supplied.

The reason for the British government’s current hostility towards Iran was plain from what David Cameron told the Knesset in 2014:

A nuclear armed Iran is a threat to the whole world not just Israel. And with Israel and all our allies, Britain will ensure that it is never allowed to happen.

That position carries forward into the present day and beyond, and serves as an excuse for the rednecks who rule our political swamp to carry on being unpleasant to the Muslim world.

After sucking up to Trump Britain rolls out red carpet to another of the world’s undesirables

Theresa May lost no time in welcoming the Israeli prime minister, Binyamin Netanyahu, to London. The two leaders this week agreed to establish a new UK-Israel Trade Working Group to strengthen their existing trade and investment relationship and “to prepare the ground for a post-Brexit trade agreement”. What good that will do in the face of rising popularity among the public of boycotting everything Israeli remains to be seen.

Regional issues, including Syria and Iran, are to be on the agenda for discussion. And regarding Palestine May repeated the mantra that – “We remain committed to a two-state solution as the best way of building stability and peace for the future” – though she doesn’t say what that will look like.

Netanyahu also met Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson and they sat alongside the desk on which the Balfour Declaration was composed in 1917. As for the forthcoming Balfour Declaration centenary celebrations, a statement said that May invited Netanyahu to attend events taking place in the UK “as a guest of government” and that Netanyahu “also invited her to visit him in Israel”.

Netanyahu didn’t miss the opportunity to warn that Iran “seeks to annihilate Israel” and called on nations to back renewed sanctions against the Iranian regime.

Israel’s ‘nest of spies’ in London

I looked up one of my old reports about how Craig Murray, a former UK ambassador to Uzbekistan, argued five years ago that British policy was being driven in an underhand fashion by the Israel lobby. He linked Matthew Gould, the then British ambassador to Israel, with the Fox-Werritty scandal and raised questions about meetings between Gould, Liam Fox and Fox’s strange friend Adam Werritty. Werritty was referred to as Fox’s adviser but according to reports he was backed financially by Israel lobbyists and had no security clearance and therefore no authorised role.

Matthew Gould

Matthew Gould’s relationship with Liam Fox, his friend Adam Werritty and the Israeli intelligence service Mossad leaves many questions to be answered

Murray, with many useful contacts from his days as an ambassador, claimed to have serious evidence connecting Gould with a secret plan to attack Iran, but the Foreign Office and the Cabinet Secretary blocked questions. (To read Craig Murray’s story, “Matthew Gould and the plot to attack Iran”, click here.)

In it he pointed out that

Matthew Gould does not see his race or religion as irrelevant. He has chosen to give numerous interviews to both British and Israeli media on the subject of being a Jewish ambassador, and has been at pains to be photographed by the Israeli media participating in Jewish religious festivals. Israeli newspaper Haaretz described him as “not just an ambassador who is Jewish, but a Jewish ambassador”. That rather peculiar phrase appears directly to indicate that the potential conflict of interest for a British ambassador in Israel has indeed arisen.

He went on to say that Gould stood suspected of participating with Fox and Werritty “in a scheme to forward war with Iran, in cooperation with Israel”. The stonewalling by the Cabinet Office and Foreign Office led Murray to conclude that “something very important is being hidden right at the heart of government”.

Labour MP Paul Flynn remarked that no previous ambassadors to Israel had been Jewish so that a conflict of interest and accusations of going native would be avoided. He was immediately rebuked. Flynn also asked about meetings between Werritty and Gould, as some reports suggested that Gould, Werritty and Fox discussed a potential military strike on Iran with Mossad. “I do not normally fall for conspiracy theories,” said Flynn, “but the ambassador has proclaimed himself to be a Zionist and he has previously served in Iran.”

Fox had earlier made the idiotic claim: “Israel’s enemies are our enemies”, and the Jewish Chronicle hailed him as “a champion of Israel within the government”. Furthermore, Fox continually rattled the sabre against Iran which, of course, is no threat to Britain but regarded by Israel as a bitter enemy. Iraq too was Israel’s enemy, not ours. Yet Fox, according to the website TheyWorkForYou, voted “very strongly” for the Iraq war. He was also an enthusiastic supporter of the war in Afghanistan.

Given that Fox so eagerly waved the flag of a foreign military power and was a man with dangerous beliefs and demonstrably weak judgement, how could those who appointed him not see that he was unfit to serve as a Minister of the British Crown – unless they were similarly tainted?

When the Werritty relationship came to light Fox jumped before being flung from the battlements. But instead of melting into obscurity he has now been rehabilitated into the senior ranks of government and is once again a Minister of the Crown. And after watching the trail blazed by our former Jewish ambassador to the Jewish State, we now gawp with fascination at the inevitably messy conflicts of interest arising from Donald Trump’s pick for US ambassador to Israel – David Friedman, a Jewish lawyer with scant respect for international law or Middle East sensitivities.

Despite the strong whiff of misconduct, David Cameron rewarded Gould by making him head of the Office of Cyber Security and Information Assurance (OCSIA), which includes e-crime, working with private sector partners on exchanging information, and engaging with international partners in improving the security of cyberspace and information security. Did it seem right for such a person to be in charge of crucial security matters at the heart of our government? What was in fellow Zionist David Cameron’s mind when he appointed him?

Could it have had anything to do with the UK-Israel academic collaboration ventures with cyber research funding, which involve partnerships between British and Israeli universities and cover research areas such identity management, regulating cyber security, privacy assurance, mobile and cloud security, human aspects of security, and cryptography?

Both countries signed a Memorandum of Understanding on digital cooperation in March 2014. And Gould’s new appointment came at a time when the Cameron government was lecturing us on threats to national security and announcing plans to trawl through our personal emails and web browsers in order to “keep us safe”. Question was, who would trawl Gould’s private emails?

The vipers in our bosom

CAAT expects a decision on the judicial review on arms to Saudi Arabia in four to six weeks. In the meantime, an undercover Aljazeera investigation has revealed that a senior political officer at the Israeli embassy in London, Shai Masot, was plotting with stooges among British MPs and other vipers in the political snake-pit to “take down” senior government figures, including Boris Johnson’s deputy at the Foreign Office, Sir Alan Duncan, a noted sympathiser of the Palestinian’s struggle. This should have resulted in the expulsion of the ambassador himself, the Israeli propaganda maestro and Netanyahu’s pet, Mark Regev, who took up the post last year. Regev is the sort of person no sensible government would let into their country. But he was let off the hook and the affair hurriedly smoothed over with an announcement from the Foreign Office that the matter was closed.

Israel's UK embassy spy Shai Masot

Shai Masot plotted with stooges among British MPs and other vipers in the political snake-pit to “take down” senior government figures

Craig Murray, however, has been digging again. The Foreign Office deflected his many questions and dismissed the idea that Masot was anything more than a member of the technical and administrative staff at the embassy. “This is plainly a nonsense,” says Murray. “Masot, as an ex-major in the Israeli navy and senior officer in the Ministry of Strategic Affairs, is plainly senior to many who are on the Diplomatic List.” He concludes that the Foreign Office is complicit in

a large nest of Israeli spies seeking to influence policy and opinion in the UK in a pro-Israeli direction. That is why the government reaction to one of those spies being caught on camera plotting a scandal against an FCO [Foreign and Commonwealth Office] minister, and giving £1 million to anti-Corbyn MPs, was so astonishingly muted.

All this and the recent UN resolution 2334, which condemned Israel’s continuing squats on Palestinian land as illegal and an obstacle to peace, has done nothing to disturb the cosy relationship between Her Majesty’s Government and the obnoxious Israelis.

On the contrary, after May’s meeting with Netanyahu a Downing Street spokesperson said they focused on, yes, cyber security:

In their discussions, the prime ministers committed to working together to build on our longstanding relationship and the strong ties that already exist between our two countries in a wide range of areas, from trade and investment, to innovation and technology, and defence and security. They talked about the important work we do together on intelligence-sharing and cyber security, and committed to talk further about how we can deepen this cooperation, to help keep our people safe.

Sitting comfortably?

Rothschild behind the creation of the Zionist terrorist state

Rothschild reveals crucial role his ancestors played in the Balfour Declaration and creation of Israel

If Americans Knew | February 9, 2017

The Times of Israel reports that Lord Jacob Rothschild recently revealed new details about the crucial role his ancestors played in obtaining the Balfour Declaration, which “helped pave the way for the creation of Israel.”

The 80-year-old Rothschild is the current head of the banking family and a strong supporter of Israel.

The Balfour Declaration (text below) was an official 1917 letter from the British Foreign Minister, Lord Balfour, addressed to Lord Rothschild, a Zionist leader in Britain at the time and the current Lord Rothschild’s uncle.

During a television interview, the Times of Israel reports that Balfour revealed for the first time the  role of his cousin Dorothy de Rothschild.

Rothschild described Dorothy, who was in her teens at the time, as “devoted to Israel,” and said: ‘What she did, which was crucially important.’”

Rothschild said that Dorothy connected Zionist leader Chaim Weizmann to the British establishment. Dorothy “told Weizmann how to integrate, how to insert himself into British establishment life, which he learned very quickly.”

Rothschild said that the way the declaration was procured was extraordinary. “It was the most incredible piece of opportunism.”

“[Weizmann] gets to Balfour,” Rothschild described, “and unbelievably, he persuades Lord Balfour, and Lloyd George, the prime minister, and most of the ministers, that this idea of a national home for Jews should be allowed to take place. I mean it’s so, so unlikely.”

The interview was was conducted by former Israeli ambassador Daniel Taub as part of the Balfour 100 project. Taub interviewed Rothschild at Waddeston Manor in Buckinghamshire, a manor bequeathed to the nation by the Rothschild family in 1957, where the Declaration is kept.

According to Ambassador Taub, the declaration “changed the course of history for the Middle East.”

The Times reports that Rothschild said his family at the time was divided on the idea of Israel, noting that some members “didn’t think it was a good thing that this national home be established there”.

Dorothy’s letters are also stored at Waddeston. They describe her later dealings with diverse Zionist leaders and her advice on the organization of the Zionist Conference, according to the Times.

Rothschild said that the Declaration went through five drafts before finally being issued on November 2, 1917.

Alison Weir reports in her book, Against Our Better Judgment: The Hidden History of How the U.S. Was Used to Create Israel, that drafts of the declaration went back and forth to Zionists in the United States before the document was finalized. The main writer was secret Zionist Leopold Amery.

Balfour Declaration Text:

Foreign Office
November 2nd, 1917

Dear Lord Rothschild,

I have much pleasure in conveying to you. on behalf of His Majesty’s Government, the following declaration of sympathy with Jewish Zionist aspirations which has been submitted to, and approved by, the Cabinet

His Majesty’s Government view with favour the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people, and will use their best endeavors to facilitate the achievement of this object, it being clearly understood that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine or the rights and political status enjoyed by Jews in any other country.

I should be grateful if you would bring this declaration to the knowledge of the Zionist Federation.


Arthur James Balfour

israel’s manipulation of UK politics: time for zero-tolerance

Israel’s manipulation of UK politics: time for zero-tolerance

Israel’s manipulation of UK politics: time for zero-tolerance

But don’t rely on the Foreign Secretary… or the Prime Minister… or the Speaker to take action. And especially not the Standards Committee.


by Stuart Littlewood


Both the Foreign Office and Boris Johnson, the UK’s Foreign Secretary, have declared the Shai Masot affair “closed” after Masot, an employee of the Israeli embassy and probably a Mossad asset, plotted with gullible British MPs and political hangers-on to “take down” senior government figures including Johnson’s deputy, Sir Alan Duncan. “The UK has a strong relationship with Israel and we consider the matter closed,” they announced. The Speaker of the House of Commons John Bercow, who is Jewish, has also declined to investigate.

Sorry, Boris. It isn’t closed – hell no. It’s just opening and it’ll run and run. You and your fellow stooges can be sure of it.

According to some reports Masot served in the Israeli navy in Palestinian waters off Gaza. Given the many atrocities committed by Israel’s gunboats against Gaza’s fishermen, and children playing on Gaza’s beach, and even peaceful unarmed humanitarian vessels bringing relief to the sick and starving there, he may well be on a wanted list for questioning about war crimes. Masot’s damning comments were captured and revealed in an undercover investigation by Al Jazeera and not, as one might have hoped, by Britain’s own beloved press barons.

Masot’s hostile connivings were going on under the eye of a recently arrived ambassador, the loathsome Mark Regev, ace propagandist, mastermind of the Israeli Lie Machine and personal spokesman for the Zionist regime’s chief thug, Netanyahu.

Emily Thornberry, the Labour Party’s shadow foreign secretary, called Masot’s activities “extremely disturbing” and has demanded a probe into the potential extent of political “interference” in the United Kingdom. There are calls for Regev to be packed off back to Tel Aviv.

A petition demanding a public inquiry can be found here.

Are British parliamentarians at last waking up? Are those who wave the flag of a nasty, murderous foreign military power about to feel the heat from an increasingly furious public? They should be very afraid.

Watch George Galloway’s devastating summing-up.

Nothing new

The realisation that we are in the grip of great evil has been slow in coming. Nine years ago twenty senior professionals wrote to the Committee on Standards in Public Life about the undue influence of the Israel lobby at the heart of British government and their deep concern about the appalling conditions forced on the civilian population in the Occupied Territories and particularly Gaza by the Israeli blockade and uncalled-for sanctions imposed by Britain and the EU.

A letter had earlier been delivered to the Foreign Office minister then responsible for the Middle East, Kim Howells, suggesting that Britain consider suspending the EU-Israel Association Agreement. The rules provide for this sanction if Israel’s conduct towards its neighbours falls short of what is required under the UN Charter and other obligations.

Howells replied: “We consider that the Association Agreement is a key tool for the EU to both enhance co-operation with Israel but also to raise any concerns. We do not support suspension of that Agreement, which would limit how we could put our viewpoint across to the Israeli government.”

When the EU demanded an end to the emergency in Gaza and the military occupation of the West Bank, Israel responded with an even tighter lockdown so another letter was sent to Mr Howells. He replied: “The UK… has strong relationships with Israel on a number of fronts… We do not consider it would be in the best interests of the UK, or the European Union, to end this relationship.”

Howells was a former chairman of Labour Friends of Israel. His opposition shadow at the time was a member of Conservative Friends of Israel.

The minister was then asked to explain what “viewpoint” Her Majesty’s Government had put to the Israeli government regarding the medieval-style siege of Gaza and the collective punishment inflicted on its already impoverished civilians in flagrant breach of the UN Charter and every conceivable code of conduct. What action had he and his Department taken to alleviate the suffering in this former British mandate? What was the status of the coastal waters off Gaza? How could Israel maintain a sea blockade lawfully and deny Gazan fishermen their livelihood?

And how did continuing the Association Agreement in these cruel circumstances “enhance co-operation” with Israel?

No answers to these questions were ever received.

So the twenty signatories reminded the Standards Committee how the lobby group, Friends of Israel, had embedded itself in the British political establishment with the stated purpose of promoting Israel’s interests in our Parliament and bend British policy.

British MPs eating out of the Israeli government’s hand

It was put to the Committee that MPs are surely not at liberty to act for a foreign military power at the expense of our own national interests, or to let foreign influence cloud their judgement.  Such conduct breached the second of the Seven Principles of Public Life, namely Integrity – “Holders of public office should not place themselves under any financial or other obligation to outside individuals or organisations that might seek to influence them in the performance of their official duties.”

The various Friends of Israel organisations had gone to great lengths to influence those in power. A good many of them, it seemed, reached their high positions with FoI help. The network acted as a sort of parliamentary freemasonry. The political director of Conservative Friends of Israel claimed that with over 2,000 members and registered supporters alongside 80 percent of the Conservative MPs, CFI was the largest affiliated group in the party. Its website stated that the CFI “strives to support the Conservative Party at all available opportunities. In the run up to the 2005 General Election… CFI supported candidates up and down the country. As candidates are now being continuously selected for target seats, CFI has developed a special programme of weekly briefings, events with speakers and a chance to participate in delegations to Israel. CFI encourages all members to help campaign for parliamentary candidates and also for local council, London and European elections.” It also had a ‘Fast Track’ group for Conservative parliamentary candidates fighting target marginal seats at the next election. The political director himself was seeking election to Parliament. If successful where would his loyalty lie? Senior Conservatives tried to justify these activities by insisting that Israel was “a force for good in the world” and “in the battle for the values that we stand for, for democracy against theocracy, for democratic liberal values against repression – Israel’s enemies are our enemies and this is a battle in which we all stand together”.

The danger of inappropriate ‘friendships’ with foreign regimes had become blazingly obvious a few days earlier when Tzipi Livni, Israel’s foreign minister, was reported to have twice asked David Miliband, our Foreign Secretary, to scrap the law that authorised magistrates to issue arrest warrants for suspected war criminals who set foot in the UK, she being a particularly bloodsoaked example. Avi Dichter, a former director of the Shin Bet spy service and involved in the Shehadeh assassination in which 14 Palestianian civilians (including children) were killed by an Israeli air strike, had to cancel a trip to London for fear of being arrested. Doron Almog, an Israeli ex-general also involved in the Shehadeh affair, narrowly avoided arrest when he landed at Heathrow in 2005. Israel wished the UK to change its laws to protect alleged war criminals. So we did so just to oblige them, in the name of “enhanced co-operation” as Mr Howells might have put it.

The Standards Committee was also told bluntly: “It is especially disconcerting to discover that at least two members of your Committee, which is pledged to uphold the Principles of Public Life, are Friends of Israel [one the president of Conservative Friends of Israel and the other a member of Labour Friends of Israel]…. Given that Israel’s deep penetration of our political system apparently prevents Britain from taking a principled stand on Middle East matters, including the violations of Palestinian human rights, we invite your Committee – minus those with an interest – to uphold the Principles of Public Life and consider the activities of the Friends of Israel as a matter for urgent investigation.”

But the Standards Committee refused to look into it. The chairman’s reply, sent in a note from a member of his office staff, said: “I regret that the Committee on Standards in Public Life has no remit to help you in this matter.”

So the public’s watchdog – the Standards Committee – which was formed specifically to uphold those Seven Principles, wasn’t playing ball. Its published remit called on it “to examine current concerns about standards of conduct of all holders of public office, including arrangements relating to financial and commercial activities and make recommendations as to any changes in present arrangements which might be required to ensure the highest standards of propriety in public life.” Wasn’t this the kind of plain English even dyed-in-the-wool bureaucrats like the Committee’s chairman could understand?

Apparently not. He added: “This Committee commented on lobbying in their first report in 1995 and re-addressed the issue, including the changes instigated by their first report, in a review in 2001. The Committee has no plans to review this area again in the near future.”

The angry twenty pointed out there was nothing in the 1995 report relating to MPs and legislators representing the interests of foreign countries within Parliament or placing themselves under the influence of a foreign country’s political lobby. Nor could they find any mention of it in the 2001 report. They asked for chapter and verse. No reply.

And there the matter has rested for nine years.


*  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *

Fast-forward to the present day and we find it’s now the Anglo-Israel Association (AIA) casting a shadow over the Standards Committee. “The Association’s primary purpose is to promote wider and better understanding of Israel in the UK; to encourage exchanges between both countries at every level and generally to support activities which foster good will between British and Israeli citizens,” says the website. But its programme is skewed mainly towards ‘educating’ Brits (including our clergy) about Israel.

The Honorary president of the AIA is the Ambassador of Israel himself. Chairman of the AIA’s Executive Committee is none other than Lord Bew, also chair of the Committee on Standards in Public Life. And its Council includes the Earl of Balfour – the 5th earl, that is – related of course to the first earl, that nincompoop Arthur Balfour whose infamous Declaration in  1917 paved the way for the shameful handover of the Palestinians’ homeland – and Christianity’s homeland – to Zionist Jews. “What we have done, by concessions not to the Jewish people but to a Zionist extreme section,” warned Lord Sydenham at the time, “is to start a running sore in the East, and no-one can tell how far that sore will extend.”

The centenary of Balfour’s Declaration will be joyously celebrated this year by Israel’s many Westminster stooges including Theresa May if her sucking-up speech to the Israel lobby last month is anything to go by.

So there’s a lot of weeding-out to do.

Those disgruntled twenty could easily become 2 million if the BDS (Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions) movement, the PSC (Palestine Solidarity Campaign), the unions and other activist groups got together. The sinister machinations of Masot and Regev have presented them an open goal. And we have Al Jazeera to thank for the brilliant exposée where our own security services failed.


Stuart Littlewood

قرابة قرن على “وعد بلفور”.. أي أمن لـ”اسرائيل”؟

ذوالفقار ضاهر

منذ 99 عاما في الثاني من تشرين الثاني/نوفمبر 1917 صدر الوعد البريطاني المشؤوم بمنح اليهود وطنا قوميا في فلسطين، والذي حمل اسم وزير الخارجية البريطاني آنذاك “آرثر بلفور” لصدوره عنه وهو الرجل الذي عمل لمصلحة الصهيونية العالمية ونفذ ما طلب منه في هذا السياق، بدعم ومساندة من رئيس الحكومة البريطانية لويد جورج.

ويبدو أن “جورج وبلفور” قدما هذه الخدمات للصهيونية ردا لخدمات قدمتها هذه الحركة لبريطانيا لا سيما خلال الحرب العالمية الاولى، ومنها ما قدمه الكيميائي الصهيوني حاييم وايزمن الذي قدم معارفه العلمية للندن في الحرب العالمية الاولى، وقد نشرت الخارجية البريطانية في العام 1952 وثائق سرّية عن فترة 1919 – 1939، بما فيها تلك التي تتعلق بتوطين اليهود في فلسطين..

[الصهاينة] وبعيد انتهاء الحرب العالمية الأولى وتفكك الإمبراطورية العثمانية في العام 1918، ومع فرض الإنتداب الإنكليزي على فلسطين من قبل عصبة الأمم في العام 1922، بدأت الحركة الصهيونية بالعمل الجدي في نقل اليهود من كل انحاء العالم الى فلسطين، وشهدت حقبة العشرينيات من القرن الماضي وكذلك خلال الحرب العالمية الثانية وصول أعداد كبيرة من اليهود الى فلسطين، وهنا يبرز الدور الأميركي في دعم قيام الكيان الصهيوني الغاصب وتركيز دعائمه في المنطقة من خلال الدور الدبلوماسي والسياسي الذي لعبته الولايات المتحدة في عصبة الأمم ومن ثم في الأمم المتحدة ومع مختلف دول العالم لدعم مسيرة الكيان الغاصب.

بريطانيا.. والمسؤولية التاريخية

وقد شهدت هذه المرحلة موجات من المقاومة العربية ضد الاستعمار البريطاني ومن ثم ضد الاحتلال الصهيوني للارض والمدن الفلسطينية، ولكن كانت المؤامرات الغربية دائما تعمل لاجهاض كل محاولة عربية لمقاومة الوصول اليهودي الى فلسطين، وبالتأكيد فإن صدور الوعد عن بريطانيا هو نتيجة لعمل بريطاني رسمي كامل وليس قرارا فرديا لشخص وزير الخارجية او رئيس الحكومة، وإن كان لهما الدور الفعال في انتاج وتمرير هذا القرار في الاطر الادارية والرسمية، وعندما نقول إن بريطانيا الرسمية هي من تقف خلف القرار فهي بالتالي تتحمل تبعات تاريخية وقانونية لكل النتائج التي أفرزها هذا القرار منذ صدوره وحتى يومنا الحاضر وبالتالي لا يعفى العرش الملكي البريطاني من هذه المسؤولية بل هو مسؤول كبير ومباشر عن كل المآسي التي نتجت عن هذا القرار.

[تهجير الفلسطينيين] وأبرز وأهم هذه النتائج -التي ستبقى بريطانيا تتحمل مسؤوليتها مع الصهاينة ومن يدعمهم وعلى رأسهم الولايات المتحدة الأميركية- هو الاعلان عن تأسيس كيان اسرائيلي على ارض فلسطين في العام 1948 وتشريد شعب بكامله من أرضه وأرض أجداده، بالاضافة إلى سيل من الجرائم التي ارتكبت منذ لحظة وصول الصهاينة عبر عصابات عديدة امتهنت قتل الابرياء بأكبر قدر ممكن وترويع من بقي على قيد الحياة بهدف تهجيره وترحيله وإجباره على ترك أرضه.

فالنتيجة المباشرة كانت قيام الكيان الغاصب وتشريد مئات آلاف الفلسطينيين بين دول الشتات العربي لا سيما في دول محيط فلسطين أي الاردن ولبنان وسوريا ومصر، ويكفي فقط إلقاء نظرة على أحوال الفلسطينيين في الداخل والخارج لنعرف بعضا من التبعات القانونية والأخلاقية التي تتحملها بريطانيا والولايات المتحدة عن تشريد شعب بكامله، ناهيك عن الجرائم المتواصلة للصهاينة داخل الاراضي الفلسطنيية من الضفة الغربية الى قطاع غزة مرورا بالقدس وغيرها من الاراضي المحتلة وداخل ما يعرف بحدود العام 1948.

[انتفاضة فلسطينية] ولكن بعد كل هذه السنوات هل تحقق فعلا الهدف من هذه المؤامرة البريطانية الاميركية الاسرائيلية على الشعب الفلسطيني والامتين العربية والاسلامية؟ هل تحقق اقامة كيان ودولة آمنة لليهود في فلسطين أم ان متطلبات الأمان ما زالت تنقص هذا الكيان بما تجعله مهددا بالزوال بشكل مستمر؟

المقاومة حاضرة في كل المراحل..

بالتأكيد ان المتابع لمجريات الامور منذ إعلان القيام عن تأسيس كيان العدو او ما بات يعرف بـ”يوم النكبة” يدرك ان اصحاب الارض من الفلسطينيين في الداخل والخارج وكذلك أحرار الامة لم يتوقفوا يوما عن مقارعة المحتل بشتى الطرق ولم ينسوا قضيتهم الام التي توجه اليها بوصلة كل قضاياهم، فمن فرق المقاومة التي كانت تشكل في القرى والمدن الفلسطينية وبمبادرات فردية في كثير من الاحيان وصولا الى تأطير العمل المقاوم عبر مختلف فصائل وحركات المقاومة الفلسطينية واللبنانية والاسلامية مرورا بانتفاضة الحجارة في فلسطين في العام 1987، بالإضافة الى ما عرف بالانتفاضة الثانية في العام 1999 عندما انتهك رئيس وزراء العدو السابق المجرم أرييل شارون المسجد الاقصى ما تسبب بغضب عارم في كل الاراضي الفلسطينية.

 والحديث عن المقاومة يجعلنا نعرّج ولو بشكل موجز على مرحلة ما بعد العام 2000 تاريخ اندحار العدو الاسرائيلي عن أغلب الأراضي اللبنانية المحتلة في جنوبه وبقاعه الغربي، حيث بات يؤرخ لمرحلة جديدة من عمر المقاومة مع تطور قدرات المقاومتين اللبنانية والفلسطينية، وقد سجل التاريخ انتصارات كبيرة في تموز وآب من العام 2006 عبر المقاومة الاسلامية في لبنان وصولا لهزيمة العدو في مواجهة المقاومة الفلسطينية خلال عدة حروب شنها على قطاع غزة في الأعوام 2008، 2012 و2014، إلا ان ما يحصل اليوم في الاراضي المحتلة من ثورة وانتفاضة فلسطينية متجددة هو قمة المقاومة والثورة المتوقدة في نفوس كل الفلسطينيين في الضفة الغربية والقدس وباقي الارض المحتلة، لذلك نرى الرعب الاسرائيلي يتجلى في أعلى درجاته وصوره عبر الخوف الدائم والمستمر في كل ساعة وكل يوم ليلا ونهارا من سكين المرأة وسيارة الاب وحجر الطفل، فبات الدهس والطعن هاجسا يؤرق الصهاينة على امتداد الارض المحتلة.

 قدرات المقاومة التي باتت “إسرائيل” عاجزة عن مواجهتها، جعلت الإستكبار العالمي بقيادة أميركا ومن معه من الدول الغربية بالإضافة الى كيان العدو، ينتقل الى مرحلة ضرب أواصر الأمة والسعي لتفتيتها وتمزيقها بشتى الطرق ولا سيما عبر ما سبق ان أعلنت عنه الإدارات الأميركية المتعاقبة من مخططات كـ”الشرق الاوسط الجديد، الفوضى البناءة(بحسب الرأي الاميركي)، صراع الحضارات، إيجاد صور جديدة للاسلام تمثله الجماعات الإرهابية كـ”داعش وجبهة النصرة” وغيرها من الجماعات التي لعبت أجهزة المخابرات الغربية في تشكيلها والاستفادة منها.

فكل ما يجري في المنطقة اليوم بالتأكيد هو بسبب زرع هذه الغدة السرطانية “إسرائيل” في جسد الأمة رغم أنها غير قابلة للحياة في محيط لا تتناغم معه ولا يقبلها بأي شكل من الأشكال، واللافت أن نفس الجهات التي تآمرت في الماضي على الأمة وأعطت الوعد بتأسيس الكيان الاسرائيلي هي نفسها اليوم تعمل على تفتيت عضد الامة وتقسيم المقسم من دولها وبلدانها، فعلى العرب والمسلمين شعوبا وحكومات عدم الوقوع من جديد في فخ المؤامرات الاميركية الغربية ومواجهتها بكل الأشكال والسبل.

المصدر: موقع المنار

Related Videos


Related Articles

99 عاماً.. نزيف وعد بلفور!

نظام مارديني
تسعة وتسعون عاماً على الوعد المشؤوم، بعد قرنٍ على «سايكس بيكو» الذي «أعطى فيه مَن لا يملك، لمَن لا يستحق»، وحيث وضعت فلسطين رهينة استعمار استيطاني، وحيث تهافت الجراد اليهودي من كل دول العالم إلى أرضنا المقدسة.

هل نلوم أجدادنا وآباءنا، رغم أننا ندرك ما كانت حالهم، حين وضع مصطلح «المسألة الفلسطينية» قيد التداول.. وحيث كانت الغيبوية التاريخية، والحضارية، تطبق علينا بعد خمسمئة عام في «الثلاجة» العثمانية؟ وحيث ظل المصطلح يتفاعل زهاء قرن إلى أن فعل ما فعله الثنائي «سايكس – بيكو» في إعادة ترتيب عظامنا.. أجل عظامنا التي لا تزال تعمل قبلياً – حتى الآن! غريب أن يتعاطى بعض شعبنا في سورية الطبيعية بكل تلك اللامبالاة، بل وبكل ذلك التواطؤ، مع الذكرى المشؤومة التي وضعتنا، شئنا أم أبينا، في بطن الكارثة!

منذ نحو قرن زرعوا قنبلة «وعد بلفور» لاستنزافنا بل ولتحطيمنا. كل ما يمكن تصوّره، فعله ذلك الوعد فينا، وبدا، كما رأينا بالعين المجردة، كما لو أن الغروب الكبير للقرن هو الغروب الكبير للأمة.

تذكرون دافيد بن غوريون، وهو النبي المسلّح، كيف بدا وقد تلاشى قائلاً: «أذهب وفي ذاكرتي كل ذلك الدم». فيما قال عزرا وايزمان «تلك الأحذية التي تقود أرواحنا»، ومن دون أن ننسى مناحيم بيغن وقد التفّ ببطانية الصوف خوفاً من كل تلك القبور التي تلاحقه. مات أيضاً داخل بطانية الصوف.. كلهم ارتطموا، أخيراً، بدمنا وتناثروا!

بعد مئة عام على وجود هذا السرطان في جسم أمتنا، وهو يتغلغل، ولكنه سرطان شظايا. أجل وكيان شظايا. الجميع ضد الجميع. حزب العمل قد ترهّل وتناثر، الليكود يتهاوى. إنها الحرب الحامية الوطيس. مَن ضد مَن؟… وفي نهاية المطاف، يتبارون: كيف نقتل الفلسطينيين بصورة أفضل؟

الأيام الأخيرة أثبتت كم أن الفلسطينيين الذين، لهذا السبب أو ذاك، وما أكثر الأسباب، عاشوا بين التشتت والشتات، بحاجة إلى أن يصبحوا ساعداً واحداً، أجل نقولها بالفم الملآن، لأن هناك مَن عمل، وعلى ذلك النحو المنهجي اللامرئي، على تحويل الفلسطينيين «شعوباً» معَدّة للتقاتل في ما بينها. ولكن التقاتل حول ماذا؟ هل تريدون أن نستفيد من تجربة هوشي منه وكيف وحّد ثلاثة عشر فصيلاً فيتنامياً تحت مظلة الفيتكونغ! كانت المسافات كبيرة بين الرجال، لكن القضية كانت كبيرة، تمثلاً باللحظة الفيتنامية الكبرى، لماذا لا تكون اللحظة الفلسطينية الكبرى؟

هذه أيام دقيقة وصعبة، بل وخطيرة، مادامت الذئاب تقف على كل المفترقات، من العراق وسورية ولبنان والأردن وفلسطين.. بل تقف على كتفي سوريانا لتغتال ما تبقى من مقاومة في هذه الأمة. هذه لحظة فلسطين.. فلسطيننا، فمَن يلتقطها؟

يقول الزعيم أنطون سعاده: «نحن أمام الطامعين والمعتدين في موقف تترتّب عليه إحدى نتيجتين أساسيتين هما الحياة أو الموت».

فمَن يصرخ: أيها الفلسطينيون استيقظوا. قبل الدولة، قبل الايديولوجيا، قبل خرائط الطريق وما أكثرها وقد تحوّلت إلى خريطة… قطع أوصال الفلسطينيين ، اجلسوا حول طاولة مستديرة، إذا لم يكن باستطاعتكم الجلوس إلى طاولة مستطيلة، ولا تخرجوا من المكان قبل أن تحرّروا – أو توحّدوا – فلسطين في داخلكم. حينذاك تصبح لكم خريطة طريقكم، وهي غير التي تطبخ في الأقبية!

وأيضاً للزعيم سعاده: «لو وجد في سورية رجل فدائي يضحّي بنفسه في سبيل وطنه ويقتل بلفور، لكانت تغيرت القضية السورية من الوجهة الصهيونية تغيّراً مدهشاً».

Related Videos


Related Articles

Garage owner “We would not do business with ISIS, we would not do business with Israel”

Brave Briton refutes Balfour Declaration after 99 years

‘We would not business with ISIS, we would not business with Israel. They are the same thing,’ the British citizen said. “The children that are getting killed there on a daily basis are just individuals that live there. They have no reason to be slaughtered and murdered in the unjust way that they are,” Israr said

British car garage owner refuted Balfour Declaration as he refused to do business with an Israeli because he believes Israel does not exist.

Jack de Lowe, an Israeli man, wanted to buy a wing-mirror for his Ford Focus and managed to locate a garage located in the Greater Manchester city of Oldham, which name is Ford Parts Oldham.

The Israeli sent an email, inquiring about the price, which he expected to be around £40, but he was quoted a price of £1,025.

In a follow-up e-mail, he asked for a clarification and he receive an e mail telling him that the garage does not want to deal with him because he is an Israeli guy.

“As we do not recognise the state of Israel, we do not ship to such non-existent countries,” the e mail reads. “However, delivery to Palestine can be arranged at a sensible price.”

Heatstreet new website called the garage to ask about the e mail and the manager and owner of the business, Mursal Israr, proudly said he had personally written and sent the email.

He insisted that he does not recognise Israel and is no interest in doing business with any person or institution affiliated with this fake country.

“I sent the email myself,” he told the Heatstreet, “Yes I did… We do not recognise the state of Israel. We do not believe in the illegal occupation of what is going on in there,” Israr added.

The courageous Briton continued: “And there are innocent Muslims and people are getting killed there on a daily basis so we do not wish to do any business with the state of Israel whatsoever because we do not recognise the state of Israel.”

Israr was told that the Israeli was not a representative of Israel and it happened for him to live there. However, he said: “Regardless of the matter. He should not live there then.

“The children that are getting killed there on a daily basis are just individuals that live there. They have no reason to be slaughtered and murdered in the unjust way that they are… We would not business with ISIS, we would not business with Israel. They are the same thing.”

It is a courageous way of a British citizen to refute the pledge which was given by his late foreign minister 99 years later. The UK has been insisting it would never even apologise for the Balfour Declaration.

Ford Parts Oldham | Israel News Online


في ذكرى وعد بلفور المشؤوم

  220 world dignitaries demand UK to apologize for Balfour Declaration

راسم عبيدات ـ القدس المحتلة

نتيجة بحث الصور عن الكاتب راسم عبيداتأكثر من مقالة كتبت حول ضرورة مطالبة بريطانيا بتحمّل مسؤولياتها التاريخية والسياسية والأخلاقية تجاه ما لحق بشعبنا من نكبات ومظالم مستمرة حتى يومنا هذا، فبريطانيا هذه الدولة الإستعمارية المارقة، هي المسؤول الأول والمباشر عن زرع دولة الاحتلال الإسرائيلي على أرض شعبنا وفي خاصرة أمتنا، ونتيجة لذلك لم يتعرّض شعبنا لنكبة واحدة باحتلال أرضه وإحلال المستوطنين الصهاينة مكانهم بعد طردهم وتهجيرهم قسراً عن ديارهم عام 1948، بل ما زالت نكباتنا مستمرة ومتواصلة، وما زالت بريطانيا الاستعمارية تدعم دولة الاحتلال الصهيوني، فاليهود عندما تعرّضوا لـ«الهولوكست» على يد النازية، ما زالت ألمانيا تتحمّل تبعات ذلك حتى اليوم وتدفع لهم التعويضات المالية وتقدّم المساعدات بشتى أنواعها المدنية والعسكرية لدولة الاحتلال.

أما نحن الفلسطينيون، فما زالت بريطانيا، ترفض تحمّل مسؤولياتها التاريخية والسياسية والأخلاقية عما حلّ بشعبنا الفلسطيني، نتيجة ماPicture سمّي بوعد وزير خارجيتهم بلفور لرجل الاقتصاد والمال اليهودي روتشيلد، بمنحهم فلسطين أرضنا كـ«وطن قومي» لهم، ولذلك نحن كشعب فلسطيني علينا في ذكرى هذا الوعد المشؤوم، القيام بإطلاق حملة واسعة تمتدّ من 2/11/2016 وحتى 2/11/2017 وتشمل فعاليات متنوّعة تستمرّ على امتداد عام كامل لوضع المجتمع الدولي، وخاصة بريطانيا أمام مسؤولياتها التاريخية ودعوتها للتكفير عن الجريمة الكبرى التي ارتكبتها، ورفع الظلم التاريخي الذي لحق بالشعب الفلسطيني. ورفع قضايا عليها تلزمها بدفع تعويضات لمئة عام مقبلة عما لحق بشعبنا من ظلم واضطهاد، وهذا لن يتأتى إلا من خلال استنفار كلّ طاقات وإمكانيات شعبنا الفلسطيني في الداخل والخارج بقواه السياسية ومكوناته المجتمعية والمؤسساتية والشعبية والجماهيرية، عبر فعاليات متعدّدة ومتنوّعة يتكاتف ويتقاطع فيها الجهد الشعبي والرسمي، من أجل محاكمة بريطانيا وإلزامها ليس فقط بدفع التعويضات، بل تصحيح هذا الخطأ التاريخي والعمل على تمكين شعبنا الفلسطيني من تحقيق حلمه وحقه في دولة مستقلة على أرضه التي طرد وهجر منها.

وعد بلفور هو في الجوهر مشروع استعماري ألبس غطاء دينياً وأسطورياً زائفاً بهدف تحقيق المطامع الاستعمارية لبريطانيا وربيبتها الحركة الصهيونية، والتي لا تزال حتى الآن من خلال مشروعها الكولونيالي دولة إسرائيل مرتبطة بمصالح الرأسمالية المتعولمة المتوحشة وزعيمتها الحالية الولايات المتحدة الأميركية.

في ذكرى هذا الوعد المشؤوم، نجد بأنّ بريطانيا ما زالت من أكثر الدول عداء لشعبنا وتنكراً لحقوقه الوطنية المشروعة، ونحن نتذكر جيداً كيف عملت بريطانيا على تعديل قوانينها وتشريعاتها القضائية، من اجل منع اعتقال ومحاكمة قادة الاحتلال العسكريين والسياسيين وضباطه وجنوده ومستوطنيه المتهمين بارتكاب جرائم حرب بحق شعبنا، على الأراضي البريطانية، وكذلك هي من هدّدت نشطاء المقاطعة بالاعتقال، واعتبرت مقاطعة دولة الاحتلال اقتصادياً واكاديمياً وثقافياً وتجارياً إلخ… شكلاً من أشكال اللاسامية.

ودائماً وقفت الى جانب أميركا برفض ممارسة أية ضغوط او عقوبات على «إسرائيل»، نتيجة لخرقها القانون الدولي واستمرار احتلالها لأرضنا، وتكثيفها للإستيطان بشكل جنوني في القدس والضفة الغربية، وبما يلغي أيّ إمكانية عملية لتحقيق ما يسمى بـ»حلّ الدولتين».

ولم تتورّع بريطانيا عن وصف نضال شعبنا بـ»الإرهاب»، حتى في ظلّ الحرب العدوانية الأخيرة على شعبنا في قطاع غزة تموز 2014 «الجرف الصامد»، وجدنا قاتل أطفال العراق والمبعوث الخاص السابق للرباعية الدولية في المنطقة، توني بلير، ذهب لكي يتضامن مع مستوطني غلاف قطاع غزة ضدّ «الإرهاب» الفلسطيني في نصرة ودعم للجلاد على الضحية، ولذلك علينا الا نألو جهداً مع كلّ اصدقائنا في العالم، من أجل خلق رأي عام ضاغط على بريطانيا، حتى في بريطانيا نفسها، لحملها على تصحيح خطئها التاريخي، وإلغاء هذا الوعد المشؤوم، وتحمّل مسؤولياتها التاريخية والسياسية والأخلاقية، فهذا الوعد المشؤوم، لم ينتج عنه نكبة واحدة لشعبنا، بل استتبعتها نكبات كثيرة، فشعبنا في الخارج حتى في مخيمات اللجوء، لم يسلم من القتل والتشريد، وشعبنا في قطاع غزة يعيش في أوضاع شبيهة بالقرو وسطية، حيث البنى التحتية المدمّرة والطاقة والكهرباء المقننة، والحصار المستمر، وعجلة الإعمار الدائرة ببطء شديد، وأكثر من 70 ألف مواطن ممن دمّرت الحرب العدوانية الأخيرة منازلهم، ما زالوا في مراكز الإيواء، والنقص في الأدوية والخدمات الطبية والصحية، والبطالة والفقر بلغت أرقاماً قياسية، أكثر من 70 من أهلنا هناك يعيشون على الإغاثة والإعانات، وتمارَس بحقهم ليس فقط عقوبات جماعية، بل يتعرّضون لسياسة تطهير عرقي من أجل إحداث تغيير كبير في الواقع الديمغرافي لصالح المستوطنين، والضفة الغربية تغرق بالمستوطنين، لكي يكونوا دولة داخل دولة، والداخل الفلسطيني 48 لم يسلم من مشاريع التهويد، حيث مشروع «برافر» التهويدي للنقب، والنكبة استولدت نكبات متوالية، ما زال شعبنا يدفع ثمنها دماً وتضحيات ولجوءاً وتشرّداً وبعداً عن أرضه التي ولد فيها وترعرع عليها، ما زالت بريطانيا والمجتمع الدولي الظالم يتنكرون لحق شعبنا في الحرية والإستقلال، والعيش بحرية وكرامة في وطن مستقلّ، علينا ملاحقة بريطانيا في كلّ المحافل الدولية وتأليب الرأي العام عليها في بريطانيا وأوروبا والعالم الغربي والعربي والإسلامي، ليس لكي تصدر اعتذاراً، بل وعداً مضاداً يؤكد حق شعبنا وحق لاجئينا بالعودة الى أرضهم التي شرّدوا منها.

وفي ذكرى هذا الوعد المشؤوم لتكن شعاراتنا المرفوعة وحملتنا ونشاطاتنا مكثفة ومركزة على «نعم لمحاكمة بريطانيا الإستعمارية»، و«لتتحمّل بريطانيا الإستعمارية مسؤولياتها التاريخية والسياسية والأخلاقية عن نكبات شعبنا ومآسيه»، «بريطانيا ملزمة بدفع تعويضات لشعبنا لمئة عام مقبلة» و«بريطانيا ملزمة بتصحيح خطئها التاريخي وتمكين شعبنا من استعادة أرضه المغتصبة».


نتيجة بحث الصور عن ‪balfour declaration‬‏

Related Videos

%d bloggers like this: