What the West needs to know about Yemen’s Ansar Allah

8 Feb 2024

Source: Al Mayadeen English

Sayyed Hussein Badr al-Din al-Houthi planted the foundations for the Ansar Allah movement in Yemen in 2004. (Al Mayadeen English; Illustrated by Arwa Makki)

By Rasha Reslan

The West’s failure to recognize Ansar Allah as a revolutionary movement may escalate the risk of a full-blown war, with the West paying a high price, ultimately leading to its defeat in West Asia.

The Ansar Allah movement has lately attracted international attention by boldly defying major world powers, particularly the United States, through their military actions to support Palestine amid the ongoing Israeli genocide in Gaza

This decision comes at a time when even larger Arab nations refrain from such interventions, despite Yemen itself enduring a decade of US-backed Saudi-led aggression and grappling with a severe humanitarian crisis due to a yearslong land, sea, and air blockade. In an attempt to thwart Yemen’s efforts and hinder Sanaa from enforcing its solidarity with Gaza, Washington and the UK launched a series of attacks on the country in recent weeks, with a plethora of media outlets shining their spotlights on the Ansar Allah, whom they call “Houthis”, hosting Orientalist pundits attempting to ‘crack their puzzle’.

The US, UK, and “Israel” persistently describe Ansar Allah as an Iranian proxy, disregarding the movement’s autonomy and independence. This misunderstanding of this revolutionary movement may escalate the risk of a full-blown war in the region, with the West paying a high price, ultimately leading to its defeat in West Asia.

So who are the Ansar Allah exactly, and what are they fighting for?

Who are the ‘Houthis’? 

The term “Houthis” refers to an indigenous tribal group in Yemen that originates from the Arab Hamdani tribe residing in northern Yemen, and is a subdivision of the larger Banu Hamdan tribe. Their main settlements are concentrated in the regions of ‘Amran and Saada.

Since the early 2000s, and after the group began explicitly voicing its anti-imperialist ideology, Western countries and think tanks, trying to demoralize them and alienate them from their population, labeled them as “Iranian proxies” and “terrorists” who should be eradicated.

However, it is essential to recognize that the “Houthis” trace their roots back to the eighth century to the arrival of Zayd ibn Ali ibn Hussein in Yemen.

Zayd ibn Ali (695–740) was the son of Ali ibn al-Hussain Zain al-Abidin and the grandson of Imam Hussain ibn Ali ibn Abi Talib. He initiated a revolution against the Umayyad caliphate, leading to his martyrdom. Zayd ibn Ali’s revolution was meant to oppose injustice like his grandfather Imam Hussein, who was martyred at Karbala in southern Iraq on 10 Muharram 61 AH (680 CE) by the army of Yazid Ibn Muawiya, the Umayyad ruler at the time.

Zayd ibn Ali is recognized as a significant religious figure not only among Shia Muslims but also by many Sunnis. Notably, Sunni jurist Abu Hanifa issued a fatwa supporting Zayd against the Umayyads. Zayd remains a pivotal revolutionary figure, with many Yemenis eventually becoming Zaydis (believing that Zayd is the true imam after Hussein ibn Ali) and is universally regarded as a martyr by both Sunni and Shia traditions, one who planted the seeds of resisting oppression and of solidarity with the oppressed.

Over the years, the “Houthis” developed their own historical narrative and political movement known as Ansar Allah, which would grow to surpass the “Houthi” element. Labeling all members of the tribal confederacy in northern Yemen as “terrorists” or “Houthis” and advocating for their indiscriminate elimination overlooks the complexity of their history and political formation.

Contemporary history

Sayyed Hussein Al-Houthi, the founder of the Ansar Allah

Sayyed Hussein Badr al-Din al-Houthi laid the foundation for the Ansar Allah movement in Yemen in 2004. During that period, Sayyed al-Houthi described the early members of the Ansar Allah movement, before it adopted this name, as a community of believers guided by the principles of the Holy Quran. He refrained from associating the movement with specific sectarian labels, underscoring its Islamic affiliation and Quranic identity as inclusive principles capable of encompassing all Muslims.
 
The Ansar Allah movement stood out in its political aspect by advocating opposition to American and Israeli meddling in West Asia, especially in Yemen.

“Sayyed Hussein Badr al-Din al-Houthi, in several lessons given under the title ‘Lessons from the Guidance of the Holy Qur’an,’ emphasized the US’ active posturing against our nation”, Yemeni diplomat Yasser Mohesn Almohallil told Al Mayadeen English.

“Ansar Allah faced persistent harassment from the authorities during the rule of Ali Abdullah Saleh. The regime made multiple attempts to pressure Sayyed Hussein Al-Houthi into changing his well-known slogan.”

“Despite these efforts, when the authorities failed to deter him, they declared war against Sayyed Hussein and his supporters. The initial confrontation occurred in the Maran area in northern Saada after he [Saleh] returned from Washington with a shipment of weapons and U.S. trainers,” he further affirmed.

After Sayyed Hussein’s martyrdom, the leadership was transferred to his father and then to his brother Sayyed Abdul-Malik al-Houthi, the current leader of Ansar Allah.

How Ansar Allah evolved into a formidable US foe

Ansar Allah, originating from Quranic principles laid down in 2001 by Sayyed Hussein, faced six wars initiated by Ali Abdallah Saleh’s authority, with the sixth involving Saudi Arabia. At that time, Ansar Allah had limited resources, armed only with AK rifles, while the government possessed advanced weaponry, most notably F-16 aircraft, tanks, artillery, and anti-aircraft weapons, Ansar Allah Resistance fighter Hammam Hassan said in an exclusive interview with Al Mayadeen English.

“The war’s cause was attributed to Ansar Allah’s ‘Death to America, Death to Israel’ slogan, and tensions escalated after a visit by Abdul-Malik to Saada, prompting Saleh’s declaration of war,” he further added.

He went on to say that Ansar Allah, initially armed with simple capabilities, progressed from manufacturing primitive bombs in juice boxes to homemade landmines, later developing missiles like Zelzal and al-Sarkha, as per Hassan.

During the war with Saleh, Ansar Allah acquired and developed weapons to serve Yemen and other free Arab nations, he said.

Regular Yemeni fighters

Regarding the weaponry possessed by the regular Yemeni Resistance fighters, Ansar Allah Resistance fighter Hammam Hassan detailed to Al Mayadeen English that the fighters are armed, first and foremost, with their strong faith in God and a commitment to the cause they are fighting for.

“I have deduced a principle from the wars in Yemen, including the war on Gaza, and that is that when two armies meet – one with powerful weapons and another with weaker weapons – the one who will win the battle is the one with a strong cause, even if their equipment is inferior,” he said proudly. 

Regular Yemeni fighters have access to widely available weapons, such as the Kalashnikov rifle and machine guns, including anti-aircraft guns. However, these weapons need to be well-maintained as they are old, he explained.

Related News

He further stressed that a regular fighter typically carries a simple machine gun, RPG launcher, or Kalashnikov, but because they are guided by principles and a strong belief, God grants them victory.

“You’ve witnessed the Yemeni fighter who, barefoot, climbed an Abrams tank – a U.S. industry icon – fearlessly captured it, and then set it ablaze with firewood back in 2016. You might wonder how such an event could unfold. It’s because the Yemeni fighter is driven by a cause, a principle, strong beliefs, and unwavering conviction, while the enemy lacks any equivalent,” he recalled.

Regarding the Americans’ ability to respond to Yemen’s attacks, he sarcastically remarked, “Let them respond. The fighters of Ansar Allah have over twenty-three years of experience and embody principles, strength, and determination. They excel in camouflaging and concealing weapons in warehouses unknown to anyone; even the fighter storing the weapons is unaware of the precise location or the name of that area. We maintain a high level of secrecy and confidentiality in such matters.”

Ground and air military capabilities

As for the ground and air military capabilities, many advanced weapons have been revealed by the Ansar Allah, particularly on the anniversary of the September 21 Revolution in 2021 and 2023.

Regarding naval weapons, locally manufactured weapons include remotely operated explosive-laden boats (Unmanned Surface Vehicles) and lethal naval mines. These weapons have been also publicly revealed. However, Ansar Allah also owns undisclosed weapons and missiles that could be deployed from vessels or the coast, Hassan divulged to Al Mayadeen English.

“Each party in the war holds cards that should not be revealed until the right moment. We could have closed the Bab al-Mandab Strait in 2017-2018 when we were besieged by countries worldwide, but with God’s grace and the wisdom of our leader, the decision to close the Red Sea passage was not taken. If we had utilized the Red Sea option, we wouldn’t have had the current capability to launch even a single shot to support Gaza,” he noted.

In the same context, Almohallil contended that Western media is trying to portray a balance in capabilities between Ansar Allah and the United States. Despite the US possessing superior capabilities, effectively countering Yemen’s tactics requires a precise military approach, an area where Washington has so far been unsuccessful, as per Almohallil.

The confrontation over the past nine years of aggression has yielded substantial benefits, he noted.

“The United States’ becoming deeply involved in the coalition led by Saudi Arabia offered valuable field experience to Ansar Allah. This experience involved dealing with an extensive, aggressive war where coalition forces utilized a range of advanced American weapons. Ansar Allah also gained insight into the strategy behind the aggression devised by Washington, allowing them to adapt their operations accordingly. This adaptation, in turn, led to a refinement in the course of operations based on an understanding of the tactics employed by the aggressors,” he added.

‘The land fights with us’

The Yemeni terrain poses a formidable challenge for any invader, as it is widely known to be one of the most rugged and demanding landscapes on the planet. The topography of Yemen is characterized by steep mountains, deep valleys, and arid plateaus, creating a complex and difficult environment to navigate. The terrain’s rough nature not only complicates military operations but also hinders infrastructure development, making it a significant factor that shapes the strategic considerations of any foreign force operating in the region.

The Yemeni mountains present extreme challenges, making it difficult for US missiles or drones to reach their peaks, rendering such attempts futile, as per Hassan.

During the Saudi-led aggression, Yemen was closely monitored by satellites and spy drones, to the extent that if there were a stone in a certain area, a drone would come, capture an image of the stone, and if the stone moved, the drone would strike the location, he said.

“This illustrates the extent of aerial surveillance in Yemen. However, we successfully concealed weapons, tanks, and aircraft. We developed long-range missiles with a reach of up to 200, 300, 500, 700 kilometers, and even a thousand kilometers. We manufactured, stored, and launched these missiles—all by the grace of God and the skills of Yemeni resistance fighters, who possess high capabilities in concealing and camouflaging. The Americans cannot reach [find] us,” he further emphasized.

The US VS Ansar Allah

In response to Ansar Allah’s operations in the Red Sea and the Gulf of Aden in support of Gaza, the United States pursued a dual strategy. Initially, the US attempted to entice the movement with financial incentives. However, when this approach proved unsuccessful, the United States opted for a more forceful response, resorting to bombing Yemen. 

On this issue, a member of the Ansar Allah political bureau, Mohammad Alfareh, described the American-British aggression on Yemen as “a blatant and unjustified act that lacks legitimacy.”

He further told Al Mayadeen English that the aggression is taking place within the framework of the protection provided by the United States and Britain to the Israeli enemy, allowing it to continue its killings, atrocities, and brutal massacres in Gaza.

“In this regard, we urge all media outlets and activists on social media not to align with the American narrative, which portrays this aggression as self-defense and protection of global navigation, falsely claiming that it is a response to the killing of their soldiers. The reality is that America is an aggressor and an occupier that came from across the oceans to dominate, plunder, and destroy. The war has been ongoing since 2001 and did not start with the killing of their three soldiers,” he clarified.

Alfareh reaffirmed that Yemen’s stance towards Gaza remains unwavering, regardless of challenges and threats.

“We consider it a humane and ethical position, seeking to achieve peace in Palestine and security in our Arab region and the world,” he said.

We also assert that our people have every right to confront the American and British aggression that violates our sovereignty and independence. It is a foreign intrusion in our region. The Muslim nations have the right to support Gaza, which is witnessing the greatest massacre committed by the Zionists with American, British, and Western support, he further added.

The official questioned, “Why does the US grant itself the right to commit crimes and aggression, supporting the Israeli enemy, and then deny our right to stand by our oppressed brothers, who are championing a just cause connected to us by religion, blood, language, culture, and nationality, more than what connects the American to the Zionist?”

On the US’ attempt to lure Ansar Allah, Ansar Allah Resistance fighter Hammam Hassan divulged to Al Mayadeen English that the movement had the option to remain silent about what is happening in Gaza, as it was promised that employees would receive salaries that had been confiscated in the years past by the coalition. Salaries have been cut for ten years now, and Yemeni citizens struggle to make ends meet. However, even the simplest Yemeni citizens, including those opposing Ansar Allah, if asked whether they’d prefer to receive ten-years’ worth of salaries in exchange for the movement’s silence on the genocide in Gaza, or participate in a demonstration condemning the genocide, they would say they do not want salaries, he further stressed.

“Let me die of hunger; I would rather not stay silent about injustice. This would be the answer. This is the Yemeni people—a proud, stubborn people,” he affirmed.

“By Allah, even if our bodies are scattered in the air, we would not abandon Palestine and Gaza.” 

Hassan went on to say that Yemen has nothing to lose, as essential infrastructure like schools and hospitals has been decimated due to the Saudi-led aggression. He asserts that the only thing Yemenis have in their possession amid all this destruction is their dignity.

In response to US strikes, Hassan reiterated that Ansar Allah is ready to face the United States directly, expressing weariness from engaging with the US’ proxies since 2002, accusing Ali Abdullah Saleh and Saudi Arabia of being American puppets. 

Ansar Allah underscores its resistance as a matter of pride and honor, confidently stating that the US will not be able to harm them, he said.

As for the US’ ability to achieve its objective to stop Ansar Allah’s operations, Yemeni Diplomat Yasser Mohesn Almohallil commented by saying, “Drawing from this experience and considering the substantial popular support that has become a significant factor in the struggle, the United States currently seems to be struggling to develop new strategies to handle a resilient and self-directed uprising force.”

This force has proven its ability to stay steadfast, shift the balance of the battle in its favor, and adapt military tactics to achieve its goals, he further added.

“The US has found, among its diverse military options, only futile attempts in imitating the tactics utilized by Ansar Allah. These attempts appear to be aimed at creating a perception of parity to restore its strategic equilibrium,”  Almohallil concluded by saying.

In short, the strength and endurance of Ansar Allah as a unified movement from its entrenched ideological principles and strategic goals adheres to an anti-imperialist and anti-Zionist agenda, centering around the Palestinian cause. Presently, the Resistance movement is united in its pursuit of two main objectives: compelling “Israel” to agree to an unconditional ceasefire in Gaza, and ending the blockade on Gaza.

In the pursuit of these goals, Ansar Allah operates based on its own political convictions and strategic interests, rather than adhering to external directives. This autonomy is a key factor in why Yemen is renowned as the graveyard of its invaders.

Read more: US-UK aggression against Yemen is an open war: Ansar Allah


Operation Al Aqsa Flood

Yemenis ditch UAE–Saudi coalition for Gaza

FEB 1, 2024

The Gaza war and renewed US–UK strikes on Yemen are shattering what remains of the UAE–Saudi-led coalition. Now Yemenis of all stripes are flocking to embrace the Sanaa government and its resistance stance.

Mohammed Moqeibel

While the Red Sea military operations of Yemeni resistance movement Ansarallah have shaken up geopolitical calculations of Israel’s war on Gaza, they have also had far-reaching consequences on the country’s internal political and military dynamics. 

By successfully obstructing Israeli vessels from traversing the strategic Bab al-Mandab Strait, the Ansarallah-led Sanaa government has emerged as a powerful symbol of resistance in defense of the Palestinian people – a cause deeply popular across Yemen’s many demographics. Sanaa’s position stands in stark contrast to that of the Saudi and Emirati-backed government in Aden, which, to the horror of Yemenis, welcomed attacks by US and British forces on 12 January.

The US–UK airstrikes have offended Yemenis fairly universally, prompting some heavyweight internal defections. Quite suddenly, Sanaa has transformed into a destination for a number of Yemeni militias previously aligned with the UAE and Saudi Arabia, now publicly declaring their allegiance to Ansarallah.

One such figure, Colonel Hussein al-Qushaybi, formerly with the Saudi–UAE coalition forces, announced in a tweet:

I am Colonel Hussein al-Qushaybi, I declare my resignation from my rank and my defection from the Legitimacy Army [army backed by Saudi-led coalition] that did not allow us, as members of the Ministry of Defense, to show solidarity with Palestine.
My message to army members: Go back to your homes, for our leaders have begun to protect Zionist ships at sea and support the [Israeli] entity, even if they try to deceive, but their support has become clear and it is still there.

Qushaybi claims he was incarcerated in Saudi prisons for 50 days – along with other Yemeni officers – for his outspoken defense of Gaza, during which he endured torture and interrogation by an Israeli intelligence officer.

Major Hammam al-Maqdishi, responsible for personal protection of Yemen’s former Defense Minister in the coalition-backed government, has also arrived in Sanaa, pledging allegiance to Ansarallah.

Simultaneously, a leaked ‘top-secret’ document from the Saudi-backed, UN-recognized Yemeni Ministry of Defense instructs military leaders to suppress any sympathy or support for Hamas or Ansarallah, as “this might arouse the ire of brotherly and friendly countries” – an implicit reference to Saudi Arabia and the UAE.

Defections and dissent 

The wave of defections within the ranks of Saudi–Emirati coalition forces is not limited to officers. Many regular troops have openly rebelled against their commanders – abandoning their positions and pledging allegiance to Ansarallah – following the recent airstrikes on Yemen. Dozens of these soldiers have been arrested and detained for displaying solidarity with Gaza. 

Yemeni news reports claim the US government, in a missive to the coalition’s Chief of Staff Saghir bin Aziz, expressed “dissatisfaction” with the lack of solidarity among his forces and demanded action.

While this trend of defections in the Saudi–Emirati coalition is not entirely new, it has accelerated considerably since the onset of the war in Gaza and the recent US-UK strikes on Yemen. 

Last February, high-ranking coalition officers, including brigade commanders from various fronts, began a series of defections, though none as significant as the current rebellion. 

These earlier defections were primarily driven by financial conditions and dissatisfaction with Saudi Arabia and the UAE for their dismissal of military commanders associated with the Islah Party (Muslim Brotherhood in Yemen), who were replaced by members of the UAE-backed Southern Transitional Council (STC) militias and those commanded by Tariq Saleh, nephew of pro-Saudi former Yemeni president Ali Abdullah Saleh. 

Most of these defections were by officer and troops associated with the Islah Party during a time when the foreign coalition began marginalizing the party’s military and political leadership, and dismantling several military sectors under their control – in favor of the UAE-controlled STC.

Now, the Gaza war has the Islah Party leadership fully breaking with its old alliances. As party official Mukhtar al-Rahbi tweeted upon the launch of US-UK strikes:

Any Yemeni who stands with the US, UK, and the countries of the coalition protecting Zionist ships should reconsider their Yemeni identity and Arab affiliation. These countries protect and support the Zionist entity, and when Yemen closed the Red Sea and the Arabian Sea to the ships of this terrorist entity, this dirty alliance struck Yemen and punished it for its noble stance towards Gaza and Palestine.

In stark contrast, the UAE-backed STC and the Tareq Saleh-led National Resistance Forces expressed readiness to protect Israeli interests. On the sidelines of the World Economic Forum in Davos, STC President Aidarus al-Zoubaidi reaffirmed his support for the British attacks against Yemen, conveying this stance to British Foreign Secretary David Cameron.

Following these statements, an entire battalion under Saleh’s command defected to Ansarallah, while many other fighters now refuse his authority because they reject supporting US–UK strikes against Sanaa and its resistance leaders. 

A shift in public sentiment

In response to the latest western aggression against Yemen, media outlets affiliated with the STC and its supporters have launched a campaign against Ansarallah and the Palestinian resistance, casting doubt on the Yemeni resistance movement’s capabilities and motives. But, their efforts have backfired badly, instead leading to widespread public fury in the country’s southern regions controlled by the UAE and Saudi-backed government. 

Map of areas controlled by Ansarallah and Saudi-led coalition

Their anger is directed at the Aden-based government‘s perceived alignment with Israel’s regional projects, sparking both protests and symbolic acts, such as burning pictures of UAE President Mohammed bin Zayed and the Israeli flag.

According to Fernando Carvajal, a former member of the UN Security Council’s Yemen expert team, Ansarallah have managed to leverage – to their benefit – the untenable position of Abu Dhabi, which normalized relations with Israel as part of the 2020 US-brokered Abraham Accords. This, he argues, has helped them gain widespread support both within Yemen and internationally.

In the wake of this unexpected public outrage, the STC has experienced a further wave of defections within its ranks. Several leaders have joined the Southern Revolutionary Movement, and openly expressed their objective of liberating southern Yemen from what they see as “Saudi–Emirati occupation.”

Amidst the wave of military realignments, prominent Al-Mahra tribal Sheikh Ali al-Huraizi – arguably the most influential figure in eastern Yemen – has come out to praise Ansarallah’s military operations against Israel-bound shipping in the Red Sea, hailing its actions as a resolute and national response to the suffering of the Palestinian people.

Huraizi stressed that the US and British aggression against Yemen was launched to protect the Zionist state, because Ansarallah’s targeted strikes were negatively impacting Israel’s economy. Calling for unity among Yemenis, the tribal leader urged steadfast resistance against Israeli influence in the country. He also called on other Yemeni factions to follow the bold leadership of Abdul-Malik al-Houthi as a means to halt the genocide taking place in Gaza.

Countdown to the coalition’s collapse 

Yemen’s deteriorating economic conditions, currency collapse in coalition-ruled areas, and ongoing conflicts among southern militias have left many Yemenis disillusioned with Emirati and Saudi proxies, whom they had hoped would bring – at the very least – economic prosperity. 

In contrast, the Ansarallah-led Sanaa government has managed to maintain a relatively stable economic situation in the areas under its control, despite the foreign-backed war aimed at toppling it. This disparity has led to a growing sentiment among UAE-aligned soldiers that they are merely pawns fighting for the interests of Persian Gulf Arab rulers, without receiving due recognition from these governments.

The contrasting stances on Palestine between the coalition and Ansarallah have deepened the Yemeni divide since the events of 7 October. Sanaa’s support for the Palestinian cause has significantly boosted its domestic standing, while US–UK strikes on the country have complicated their Persian Gulf allies’ position by prioritizing Israeli interests over all other calculations. 

Disillusionment with the coalition will have profound political and military implications for Yemen, reshaping alliances, and casting the UAE and Saudi Arabia as national adversaries. Palestine continues to serve as a revealing litmus test throughout West Asia – and now in Yemen too – exposing those who only-rhetorically claim the mantle of justice and Arab solidarity. 

The views expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect those of The Cradle.

UAE funded political assassinations in Yemen, BBC unmasks

January 23, 2024

Source: BBC Arabic

Soldiers with a military coalition in Yemen backed by Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates stand guard in the port city of Hodeida on Jan. 22, 2019. (AFP)

By Al Mayadeen English

The most recent political assassination in Yemen, as reported by Yemeni human rights lawyer Huda al-Sarari, occurred just last month, involving the killing of an imam in Lahj using the same method.

The UAE has reportedly financed politically motivated assassinations in Yemen, as revealed by a recent investigation conducted by the BBC

The revelations surface amid the heightened global focus on Yemen following recent ship attacks in the Red Sea in support of the Palestinian people in light of the ongoing Israeli genocidal war.

Emirati officers in Yemen have utilized “counter-terrorism training” offered by US mercenaries to instruct locals for covert operations, leading to a significant increase in political assassinations, as per information provided by a whistleblower to BBC Arabic investigations.
 
The BBC investigation revealed that contrary to the stated objective of US mercenaries to eradicate groups like al-Qaeda and Islamic State (IS) in southern Yemen, the UAE has, in reality, enlisted former al-Qaeda members for a security force formed on the ground in Yemen to combat Ansar Allah movement and other Resistance factions.

The UAE government has refuted the accusations made in the investigation, claiming that the accusations of assassinating individuals without ties to terrorism are “false and without merit.”

The wave of killings in Yemen, comprising over 100 assassinations within a three-year span, is just one facet of a persistent and contentious global war on the country involving various international powers in the Middle East’s most impoverished nation.

“Leaked drone footage of the first assassination mission gave me a starting point from which to investigate these mysterious killings. It was dated December 2015 and was traced to members of a private US security company called Spear Operations Group,” BBC Arabic‘s Nawal al-Maghafi said in a radio documentary.

“I finally met one of the men behind the operation shown in the footage in a restaurant in London in 2020. Isaac Gilmore, a former US Navy Seal who later became chief operating officer of Spear, was one of several Americans who say they were hired to carry out assassinations in Yemen by the UAE”, she added.

In accordance with international law, any killing of civilians without proper legal proceedings would be categorized as extrajudicial.

Related News

US mercenaries: Killing in Yemen

Gilmore and another Spear employee, Dale Comstock, informed BBC Arabic‘s Nawal al-Maghafi that the mission they conducted concluded in 2016. However, assassinations in southern Yemen persisted and increased in frequency, according to investigators from the human rights group Reprieve.

Reprieve investigated 160 killings in Yemen from 2015 to 2018, with the majority occurring after 2016. Only 23 of the 160 individuals killed were found to have links to alleged “terrorism”. The killings were executed using the same tactics employed by Spear: initiating an improvised explosive device (IED) as a distraction followed by a targeted shooting.

The most recent political assassination in Yemen, as reported by Yemeni human rights lawyer Huda al-Sarari, occurred just last month, involving the killing of an imam in Lahj using the same method.

According to Gilmore, Comstock, and two other mercenaries from Spear who preferred not to be named, Spear had been engaged in training Emirati officers at the UAE military base in Aden. A journalist, wishing to remain anonymous, mentioned having seen footage of such training.

While the mercenaries did not provide detailed information about the training, a senior Yemeni military officer from Aden, who had direct dealings with the UAE, offered more insights.

Due to the conspicuous profile of the mercenaries in Aden and the risk of exposure, their role was altered to train Emirati officers, who, in turn, instructed local Yemenis in the targeting process, as revealed by the Yemeni military officer.

Throughout the investigation, over a dozen Yemeni sources, including two individuals claiming to have carried out non-terror-related assassinations after being trained by Emirati soldiers, corroborated this account. Additionally, one man mentioned he was offered release from a UAE prison in return for assassinating a senior Yemeni political figure, a mission he reportedly declined. Enlisting Yemenis for the assassinations aimed at making it more challenging to trace the killings back to the UAE.

Human rights lawyer Huda al-Sarari: A tale of UAE’s terror

Human rights lawyer Huda al-Sarari, who has been probing human rights violations committed by UAE-backed forces, faced death threats due to her work. Tragically, her 18-year-old son Mohsen was shot in the chest in March 2019 and succumbed to the injuries a month later.

After returning to work, al-Sarari received threatening messages warning her to stop, questioning if one son’s death was not enough. An investigation revealed Mohsen was killed by a member of the UAE-backed “Counter Terrorism Unit”, but no prosecution followed. Members of the prosecutor’s office admitted being too fearful to pursue justice in cases involving UAE-backed forces. A leaked UAE document obtained by Reprieve indicated that Spear was still receiving payment in 2020, although the capacity is unclear.

Read more: Mercenaries in Yemen: Nationalities, numbers & horrors

Related Stories

All UK, US interests in region are legitimate targets: Yemeni Council

12 Jan 2024 

Source: Al Mayadeen

Yemeni Resistance fighters boarding the cargo ship Galaxy Leader on Sunday, Nov. 19, 2023 (AP)

By Al Mayadeen English

UK and US presence in the Red Sea violates International Law, and the Republic of Yemen is responsible for dealing with it appropriately.

The Yemeni Supreme Political Council of the Sanaa government issued a statement on the joint US-UK overnight aggression against Yemen warning of imminent retaliation

“What the country has been subjected to is an unjustified and illegitimate American-British aggression, which violates all international laws,” the statement’s opening statement read. 

“All American and British interests have become legitimate targets for the Yemeni Armed Forces in response to their direct and announced aggression against the Yemeni Republic,” the Supreme Political Council warned. 

“The aggression on Yemen is an extension of the treacherous American targeting of the Yemeni Naval Forces and the American-British-Zionist aggression on the people of Gaza. The American-British aggression is a real threat to international peace and security, putting the region at grave stakes.”

“The presence of American and British forces, and those allied to them, under false pretexts in the Red Sea and the Bab al-Mandab [strait] is rejected and violates all laws. This presence [of the US and UK in the Red Sea] is a threat to international navigation, and it’s the duty of the Yemeni Republic to deal with it the way it sees fit.”

“We affirm the commitment of the Yemeni Republic to what was declared at the beginning of its naval operation to end the blockade, stop the aggression, end the genocidal war on Gaza, and allow the entry of food, medicine, fuel, and all means of life.”

Related News

Read more: US CENTCOM claims hitting over 60 targets in Yemen, 100 bombs dropped

Yemeni military expert: Aggressors think the Armed Forces would employ overt military sites

In an interview for Al Mayadeen Net, Yemeni military expert Aabed al-Thawr said the aggression has not achieved any accomplishments, and targeting these areas has no real impact, explaining that these locations were originally destroyed during the war waged by the Saudi coalition for nearly 9 years.

Al-Thawr noted that the aggression targeted overt military sites, expressing surprise that the aggressors would actually think that the Yemeni Armed Forces had resumed using them so shortly after the war with Saudi Arabia. Al-Thawr added that the Armed Forces have fortified and secret military sites for conducting their military operations.

One of the military bases targeted by the aggression, according to al-Thawr, is the Delmi base. He said that it is currently used for civilian aviation, not military purposes, noting that the Saudi coalition had formerly launched several attacks against it and failed to completely destroy it.

As for Hodeidah Airport, which was also targeted in the overnight aggression, the military expert confirmed to Al Mayadeen Net that it was already destroyed, and the Saudi coalition had booby-trapped the area around it. 

Supreme Political Council: Aggression will not undermine the Armed Forces: neither militarily nor morally

In the same context, Secretary of the Supreme Political Council Yasser al-Houri told Al Mayadeen Net, “This aggression is not new. Yemen has been facing an alliance led by Saudi Arabia and the UAE on behalf of the United States and the United Kingdom for about 9 years.”

Al-Houri considered this aggression an extension of the attacks on the naval forces and an extension of the aggression on Gaza. He emphasized that the Yemeni armed forces have their own methods of confrontation, and these strikes will not affect them militarily or morally. Yemen has faced greater challenges and triumphed over them, according to al-Houri.

Read more: Biden faces backlash from some Democrats over strikes on Yemen

Related Videos

Special coverage | American-British aggression against Yemen…and Sanaa: They must prepare to pay a heavy price …
Evening | Sanaa after the American-British aggression: The response is coming 01-12-2024
The region faces further escalation – Points on the Letters – Nasser Qandil – 1-12-2024
Washington is as foolish as Tel Aviv. It goes to confrontation with arrogance and illusions and without an exit strategy – this is Yemen, pay attention!
A field general threatens to burn Israel with ammonium nitrate: “Hezbollah’s” missile snakes and “Al-Sayyid’s” nuclear plan!
The battles are continuing, the all-out wars are devastating, and Yemen is ready for a long-term war.. The axis of resistance to Europe has turned?!

Related News

Operation Al Aqsa Flood

How Yemen is blocking US hegemony in West Asia

DEC 29, 2023

Source


The new US-led coalition in the Red Sea will struggle to overcome Yemen’s naval blockade on Israel, as Ansarallah’s domestically-produced and inexpensive drones and missiles have leveled the technological playing field.

William Van Wagenen

Given the renewed focus on Yemen’s de facto government led by Ansarallah and its armed forces, it is time to move beyond the simplistic and dismissive characterization of the Houthis as merely a ‘rebel’ group or a non-state actor.

Since the start of the war by the Saudi-led coalition against Ansarallah in 2015, the Yemeni resistance movement has transformed into a formidable military force that has not only humbled Saudi Arabia but is also now challenging Israel’s genocidal actions in Gaza as well as the superior firepower and resources of the US Navy in the world’s most important waterway.

Economic fallout of Yemens naval operations

In response to Israel unleashing unprecedented violence on Gaza, killing over 20,000 people, predominantly women and children, Yemen’s Ansarallah-led armed forces announced on 14 November their intent to target any Israeli-linked ship passing through the strategic Bab al-Mandab Strait in the Red Sea. This crucial waterway serves as the gateway to the Suez Canal, through which approximately 10 percent of global trade and 8.8 million barrels of oil travel each day.

On 9 December, Ansarallah announced it would expand its operations further to target any ship in the Red Sea on its way to Israel, regardless of its nationality. “If Gaza does not receive the food and medicine it needs, all ships in the Red Sea bound for Israeli ports, regardless of their nationality, will become a target for our armed forces,” an Ansarallah Armed Forces spokesperson said in a statement.

To date, Ansarallah has successfully targeted nine ships using drones and missiles, and managed to seize one Israeli-affiliated ship in the Red Sea, according to their official statements. These operations have prompted the largest international shipping companies, including CMA CGM and MSC, and oil giants BP and Evergreen, to re-route their Europe bound ships around the horn of Africa, adding 13,000km and significant fuel costs to the journey.

Delays, transit times, and insurance fees for commercial shipping have skyrocketed, threatening to spark inflation worldwide. This is especially worrisome for Israel, which is already contending with the economic repercussions of its longest and deadliest conflict with the Palestinian resistance in history. 

Additionally, Ansarallah has launched multiple missile and drone attacks on Israel’s southern port city of Eilat, decreasing its commercial shipping traffic by 85 percent.

The disruption in the Red Sea directly undermines a key element of the White House’s 2022 National Security Strategy, which unequivocally states that the US will not permit any nation “to jeopardize freedom of navigation through the Middle East’s waterways, including the Strait of Hormuz and the Bab al-Mandab.”

Coalition of the unwilling

On 18 December, in response to Sanaa’s operations, Secretary of State Lloyd Austin declared the establishment of a naval coalition named Operation Prosperity Guardian, with some 20 countries called to counter Yemeni attacks and ensure safe passage of ships through the Red Sea.

Austin announced the new maritime coalition would include, among others, Britain, Canada, France, Italy, Spain, Norway, the Netherlands, the Seychelles, and Bahrain.

Map of the US-led Combined Maritime Forces (CMF) in West Asia and North Africa. 

In response to the announcement, Ansarallah politburo Mohammed al-Bukhaiti vowed that Yemen’s armed forces would not back down:

Yemen awaits the creation of the filthiest coalition in history to engage in the holiest battle in history. How will the countries that rushed to form an international coalition against Yemen to protect the perpetrators of Israeli genocide be perceived?

The embarrassment for Secretary Austin and White House advisor Jake Sullivan was swift. Shortly after the coalition’s announcement, key US allies Saudi Arabia and Egypt declined participation. European allies Denmark, Holland, and Norway provided minimal support, sending only a handful of naval officers.

France agreed to participate but refused to deploy additional ships to the region or place its existing vessel there under US command. Italy and Spain refuted claims of their participation, and eight countries remained anonymous, casting doubt on their existence.

Ansarallah has therefore destroyed another pillar of the White House National Security Strategy, which seeks “to promote regional integration by building political, economic, and security connections between and among US partners, including through integrated air and maritime defense structures.”

Revolutions in naval warfare

The Pentagon plans to defend commercial ships using missile defense systems on US and allied naval carriers deployed to the region.

But the world’s superpower, now largely on its own, does not have the military capacity to counter attacks from war-torn Yemen, the poorest country in West Asia.

This is because the US relies on expensive and difficult to manufacture interceptor missiles to counter the inexpensive and mass-produced drones and missiles that Ansarallah possesses.

Austin made his announcement shortly after the USS Carney destroyer intercepted 14 one-way attack drones on just one day, the 16th of December.

The operation appeared to be a success, but Politico swiftly reported that according to three US Defense Department officials, the cost of countering such attacks “is a growing concern.”

The SM-2 missiles used by the USS Carney cost roughly $2.1 million each, while Ansarallah’s one-way attack drones cost a mere $2,000 each.

This means that to shoot down the $28,000 worth of drones on 16 December, the US spent at least $28 million in just one day.

Ansarallah has now launched more than 100 drone and missile attacks, targeting ten commercial ships from 35 countries, meaning the cost of US interceptor missiles alone has exceeded $200 million.

But cost is not the only limitation. If Ansarallah persists with this strategy, US forces will quickly deplete their interceptor missile stocks, which are needed not only in West Asia but in East Asia as well.

As Fortis Analysis observed, the US has eight guided missile cruisers and destroyers operating in the Mediterranean and Red Seas, with a total of 800 SM-2 and SM-6 interceptor missiles for ship defense between them. Fortis Analysis further notes that production of these missiles is slow, meaning any ongoing campaign to counter Ansarallah will quickly deplete US interceptor missile stocks to dangerously low levels. Meanwhile, the US weapons manufacturer Raytheon can produce less than 50 SM-2 and fewer than 200 SM-6 missiles annually. 

If these stocks are diminished, this leaves the US Navy vulnerable not only in the Red Sea and Mediterranean, where Russia is also active, but also in the Pacific Ocean, where China poses a significant threat with its hypersonic and ballistic missiles.

Fortis Analysis concludes by observing that the longer Ansarallah continues “throwing potshots” at commercial, US Navy, and allied maritime assets, “the worse the calculus gets. Supply chains win wars – and we are losing this critical domain.”

And Ansarallah has not yet tried a drone swarm attack, which would force US ships to counter dozens of incoming threats at one time.

“A swarm could tax the capabilities of a single warship but more importantly, it could mean weapons get past them to hit commercial ships,” Salvatore Mercogliano, a naval expert and professor at Campbell University in North Carolina observed.

Moreover, US warships would also face the question of how to replenish their missile inventory.

USS John Finn and USS Porter missiles capacity

“The only site to reload weapons is at Djibouti (a US base on the Horn of Africa) and that is close to the action,” he said.

Other experts suggest that the ships would either sail to the Mediterranean Sea to reload from US bases in Italy and Greece, or to the Gulf island of Bahrain which holds the Naval Support Activity and is home to US Naval Forces Central Command and United States Fifth Fleet.

The great equalizer

As a result, Abdulghani al-Iryani, a senior researcher at the Sanaa Center for Strategic Studies, described the situation in Yemen as a case where technology acts as a “great equalizer.”

“Your F-15 that costs millions of dollars means nothing because I have my drone that cost a few thousand dollars that will do just as much damage,” he told the New York Times.

While the US military is successful at producing expensive, technologically complex weapons systems that provide excellent profits for the arms industry, such as the F-15 warplanes, it is not capable of producing enough of the weapons needed to actually fight and win real wars on the other side of the world, where supply chains become even more critical.

In Yemen, the US is heavily challenged by the same problem it faced while fighting a proxy war in Ukraine against Russia, which after almost two years, US officials acknowledge is all but lost.

Moscow has the industrial base and the supply chains in place to produce hundreds of thousands of the low-cost, rudimentary 152mm artillery shells – two million annually – needed for success in a multi-year war of attrition fought largely in trenches. The US, quite simply, does not. Washington’s war industrial complex is currently, at best, manufacturing 288,000 shells annually and seeks to manufacture one million shells by the year 2028, still only half of the Russian manufacturing ability.

Additionally, one Russian 152mm artillery round costs $600 dollars according to western experts, whereas it costs a western country $5,000 to $6,000 to produce a comparable 155mm artillery shell.

Enter Iran

The security situation will only get worse for the US should Iran enter the conflict in support of Ansarallah, the signs of which are emerging already.

On 23 December, the US openly accused Iran of targeting commercial vessels for the first time since the start of Israel’s war on Gaza, claiming a Japanese-owned chemical tanker off the coast of India was targeted by a drone “fired from Iran.”

The same day, Tehran denied the allegations but threatened the forced closure of other crucial maritime shipping lanes unless Israel halts its war crimes in Gaza.

“With the continuation of these crimes, America and its allies should expect the emergence of new resistance forces and the closure of other waterways,” Mohammad Reza Naqdi, an official in Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), warned.

As a reminder, Iran possesses the largest and most diverse missile arsenal in West Asia, with thousands of ballistic and cruise missiles, some capable of striking Israel.

On 24 December, Iran announced its navy had added “fully smart” cruise missiles, including one with a 1,000km range that can change targets during travel, and another with a range of 100km which can be installed on warships.

With US and Israeli forces already under pressure from the Axis of Resistance forces in Lebanon, Syria, Iraq, Palestine, and now Yemen, the possible entry of Iran in the conflict is even more ominous for Washington, especially in an election year.

Genocide as a foreign policy

So, how far are President Joe Biden, Secretary of State Antony Blinken, and Jake Sullivan willing to go to facilitate Israel’s ongoing carnage in the Gaza Strip?

The trio’s commitment to military aid packages for Israel and Ukraine, despite looming debt concerns, raises questions about their priorities.

The potential risk to the security of the US Navy in the Pacific Ocean may force a re-evaluation of the situation soon. This leaves the US with the option of direct military intervention in Yemen, a course of action with its own ethical and geopolitical consequences.

Recognizing the difficulty of countering Ansarallah from a defensive posture, at least some in the US national security establishment are demanding US forces go on the offensive and strike Yemen directly.

On 28 December, former vice admirals Mark I. Fox and John W. Miller argued that “deterring and degrading” Iran and Ansarallah’s ability to launch these attacks requires striking the forces in Yemen responsible for conducting them, “something no one has yet been willing to do.”

Yemen itself has just emerged from an eight-year, US-backed Saudi and UAE war that led to the worst humanitarian crisis in the world. Both Persian Gulf nations used US bombs to kill tens of thousands of Yemenis, while imposing a blockade and siege that led to hundreds of thousands of additional deaths from hunger and disease.

According to Jeffrey Bachman of the American University, Saudi Arabia and the UAE carried out a “campaign of genocide by a synchronized attack on all aspects of life in Yemen,” which was “only possible with the complicity of the United States and United Kingdom.” And yet Ansarallah emerged stronger militarily from that conflict.

If US support for two genocides in the Arab world are not enough, maybe the third will be the charm.

The views expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect those of The Cradle.

The ‘Gulf’ widens as GCC states differ on US strategy against Yemen

DEC 27, 2023

Photo Credit: The Cradle

Khalil Harb

The US-led Red Sea coalition’s shaky start reveals the Persian Gulf’s vastly divergent views on the maritime force’s utility, with differences set to intensify as aggressions kick off.

More than a week has passed since US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin unveiled the multi-national naval task force Operation Prosperity Guardian to counter operations by Yemen’s Ansarallah-aligned armed forces in the Red Sea to blockade Israel-bound vessels in response to the war on Gaza.

However, the mission’s nature, objectives, and members – including Bahrain – have become increasingly ambiguous. While Manama announced its participation, the absence of fellow Gulf Coorporation Council (GCC) members Saudi Arabia and the UAE raises intriguing questions.

Even Bahrain’s motives are hazy, given that it lacks any naval fleet of military significance, and relies on small vessels and combat forces for its own maritime defenses. As such, skepticism surrounds the extent of the tiny Persian Gulf emirate’s actual military contribution. 

Bahrain has Israel’s back 

One Bahraini opposition leader, speaking to The Cradle on the condition of anonymity, describes Manama’s participation as “the necessity of what is not necessary.” The leader points to Bahrain’s complex loyalties to the US, Saudi Arabia, the UAE, and Israel, in addition to its GCC membership as likely reasons for its odd decision.

The Bahraini government’s stance, especially amid Israel’s genocidal onslaught in Gaza, has shocked many within the country, in spite of its unpopular decision in 2020 to normalize relations with the occupation state. Under pressure, however, Manama did recall its ambassador from Tel Aviv and temporarily suspended economic relations on 2 November – though the Israelis claim they had not been officially informed of the withdrawal of the Bahraini ambassador and say relations between the two countries are stable. 

A well-informed Bahraini source informs The Cradle that this detached position aligns with the government’s policy since signing the UAE-led and Washington-brokered Abraham Accords. The government, he says, has sought to adopt a neutral stance on the Palestinian-Israeli conflict, not recognizing it as a struggle against occupation and overlooking its significance to Arab national security. 

“This policy, first, was expressed by the Bahraini Crown Prince and Prime Minister Prince Salman bin Hamad Al Khalifa, when he described what Hamas has done as a terrorist act, and at the same time condemned the Israeli massacres in an attempt to maintain a neutral center.”

The source further points out that Bahrain’s alignment with Abu Dhabi’s policy reflects a shift towards “the Emirati orbit over the Saudi one.” This is evident in its delayed reconciliation with Qatar, initiated by Riyadh but met with hesitation in Manama. Likewise, the UAE had a slower approach to restoring relations with Doha than the Saudis. 

Submissive stance to US influence

Bahrain has a historical role as a key US military ally since 1995, when it opened large areas of its small territory to establish regional headquarters for the US Fifth Fleet. Today, those facilities include an aircraft carrier, several submarines, naval destroyers, dozens of fighter jets, thousands of American soldiers, and their residential headquarters within this military base, which is considered one of the largest centers of the US military outside the United States.  

According to the aforementioned Bahraini source, the Manama-based US naval force serves as “an advanced American base to carry out Washington’s intelligence and military work in the region, and its presence reflects the latter’s dominance over the political decision in the Kingdom when the need arises.”  

Bahrain is also the headquarters of the Joint Maritime Force, established in 2001 to confront the so-called “threat of international terrorism.” The force includes 39 countries, including Britain, which has established an expanded military occupation on the territory of Bahrain, specifically at Juffair Naval Base since 2018, which represented Britain’s first military base in West Asia in four decades. 

The Bahraini source explains that while the US and UK have all the resources they need in the Persian Gulf to run the new anti-Yemen maritime themselves, what they really needed was Arab cover for these hostile activities:

“In essence, Washington does not need Bahraini forces to secure navigation in the region while it has more than 30,000 soldiers in the  Gulf and it can manage these operations from its various military bases, but it needs Arab cover after many Gulf countries, led by Saudi Arabia and the UAE, rejected Arab and Gulf legitimacy (publicly) for this alliance.” 

It is a risky move for Manama. Bahrain’s participation in the naval coalition is unlikely to yield positive outcomes for the state and could pose threats to its strategic security, particularly if Yemen’s Ansarallah forces decide to retaliate against Prosperity Guardian’s strikes. 

Targeting Bahrain would be “low-hanging fruit” for the Yemenis, not just because it is small and largely defenseless on its own, but also because it hosts bases for leading western aggressors – the US and UK.

As the opposition leader explains to The Cradle:

Manama also “risks facing further isolation and internal separation, given that the people of Bahrain are unanimous in rejecting the Israeli occupation, covering for it, or working to achieve its interests at the expense of the Palestinian people.” 

Bahrain’s decision to participate in the US-led coalition, despite GCC leaders Saudi Arabia’s own refusal over security concerns, only goes to show the extent of Bahrain’s submission to US hegemony and its new ally Israel. Says another Bahraini source:

“There is no justification for Bahraini participation at a time when Saudi Arabia, its major neighbor, for security considerations rejects confronting Ansarallah and maintains its position on the massacres committed against the Palestinians.”

Riyadh’s recalibration 

The absence of Saudi Arabia from the coalition is especially noteworthy. Disillusioned by past US policies, including the Arab Spring and the 2015 nuclear deal with Iran, Riyadh now seems inclined towards a reconciliation with Tehran and has ratcheted up relations with US adversaries Moscow and Beijing, marking a shift in its regional and global strategic considerations.

Rather than deeply engaging in efforts against Israeli aggression or the Iran-led Axis of Resistance, Saudi Arabia appears more focused on dialing down regional conflicts, particularly its own eight-year war against Yemen. The kingdom has welcomed the UN’s road map for peace and Omani-brokered negotiations with Sanaa, indicating a desire to exit the devastating war and shift its focus away from a heavy reliance on US support.

For the Saudis, the ongoing war in Gaza and Yemen’s prominent role in the regional resistance axis present an opportunity to extricate itself from the war against its southern neighbor, in which it is emphasizing a local settlement between Yemeni parties and the Sanaa government led by Ansarallah.

Riyadh showed its direction early, in November, by hosting the Arab-Islamic summit to “dutifully”show solidarity with Gaza without actually taking meaningful action. The Saudis appear uninterested in engaging too heavily in the fracas, whether to halt Israeli aggressions or to confront the “axis of resistance” in whose ranks Yemenis are a vital player. 

Stability after all, is crucial for Saudi Crown Prince Muhammad bin Salman’s Vision2030 and its ambitious projects such as NEOM, Expo 2030, and the 2034 FIFA World Cup, prompting a reconsideration of its involvement in yet another US-led regional aggression that offers little upside. 

UAE’s geostrategic considerations

The UAE, known for its strategic calculations, appears to be treading much more cautiously in the regional confrontation, and is playing a strong role behind the scenes. When Ansarallah threatened sea lanes, the UAE moved to develop a land bridge through Saudi and Jordanian territories to Israel for the transportation of goods from East Asia. 

Although risky for Abu Dhabi to so openly aid Israel’s economy while Tel Aviv imposes a draconian siege on Palestinians in Gaza,  by doing so, the UAE has significantly boosted its economic and political value to the occupation state. In this, the Emiratis have displayed a steadfastness to normalization that could trigger dangerous repercussions should regional confrontation escalate.

Considering the potential backlash, the Emiratis are hesitant to openly support Israel through military naval power, fearing Yemeni and broader Arab and Muslim resentment. Abu Dhabi prioritizes its image as a safe and stable oasis, mindful of Ansarallah’s missile and drone attacks from just a year ago. 

Essentially, the Persian Gulf state aim to avoid jeopardizing their security interests by engaging in ambiguous military actions that could undermine their carefully crafted narrative of stability and progress.

The fate and feasibility of Operation Prosperity Guardian is currently shrouded in uncertainty, particularly in light of recent setbacks and the withdrawal of crucial western allies from participating under a US command. 

The divisions among Persian Gulf states regarding the maritime coalition further highlight a region awakening to the realization that Washington’s dominance is no longer as unassailable as it once seemed. The emerging awareness suggests that Yemen and other members of the Resistance Axis possess the capability to impose a new equation against Israel.

The views expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect those of The Cradle.

First Time Since 2015: Yemeni Armed Forces Display Advanced Capabilities Amid Celebrations

Sep 24, 2023

In an extraordinary display of military strength, the Yemeni armed forces have unveiled a series of surprises that have left both observers and residents of the capital, Sana’a, in awe. This remarkable event aligns with the celebrations of the 21st and 26th of September revolutions and the anniversary of the Prophet’s birthday.

For the first time since the onset of aggression in 2015, Yemeni warplanes, specifically US-made F5 fighters, were observed soaring in the skies of Sana’a during the military parade that took place last Thursday. Accompanied by several military helicopters, this marked a significant advancement in Yemen’s military capabilities.

This unexpected display is seen as an indication of the substantial progress that the Yemeni army has made during these challenging times. The event coincides with Yemen’s celebrations of the revolutions on September 21 and 26, as well as the anniversary of the Prophet’s birthday. Last Thursday, Yemen’s capital witnessed its largest and strongest military parade to date, with these fighter jets participating for the first time during the war.

Contrary to previous claims made by the aggression coalition in Yemen, which stated that all military arsenals, including warplanes, had been destroyed, Yemen’s military helicopters have not only returned to the skies but have also participated in qualitative military parades.

Last year’s September 21 revolution celebrations witnessed massive and qualitative military parades that revealed new weapons. This year’s military parade was even more impressive, indicating that Yemen is becoming stronger militarily each year.

This development sends a potent message to the countries involved in the aggression, particularly Saudi Arabia. It signifies that the Yemeni armed forces now possess diverse and advanced capabilities that will play a crucial role in their ongoing battle for liberation and independence. This revelation underscores the urgency for these forces to consider a fair peace option to avoid potential escalation.

Related Videos

Saif Al-Quds Forum – Dialogues 9-24-2023 – Dimensions of the Chinese-Syrian summit – and no change in the Saudi positioning
Yemen unveils new missiles in its military parade
Military parade and celebration of September 21, 2023

Related News

Saudi messages positive, must be put into practice: Politburo chief

20 Sep 2023

Source: Agencies + Al Mayadeen

The head of the Supreme Political Council in Yemen, Mahdi al-Mashat (Yemeni media)

The Yemeni leader expresses Sanaa’s readiness to address Riyadh’s concerns as much as the latter is ready to address Yemeni concerns.

By Al Mayadeen English

The head of the Supreme Political Council in Yemen, Mahdi al-Mashat, pointed out on Wednesday that Sanaa is pleased with what the Yemeni delegation conveyed from the Saudi leadership, adding that these are “positive messages that we ask to put into practice.”

Al-Mashat appreciated the efforts made in the negotiations file, saying, “We appreciate the efforts of the Sultanate of Oman.”

The Yemeni leader confirmed Sanaa’s readiness to address Riyadh’s concerns as much as the latter is ready to address Yemeni concerns.

“We look forward to adjustments in international positions that have prolonged the suffering of the Yemeni people,” he indicated.

In the same context, Saudi Defense Minister Khalid bin Salman Al Saud voiced optimism regarding the peace talks with the Sanaa delegation aimed at reaching a resolution to the long-standing war.

In a post on X, formerly Twitter, the minister said he had a meeting with the Sanaa delegation in Riyadh, during which the two sides tackled efforts to facilitate the “peace process in Yemen.”

He further stressed that Saudi Arabia stands firmly behind Yemen and reiterated the Kingdom’s dedication to facilitating dialogue among all involved parties, with the aim of achieving a comprehensive political resolution under the supervision of the United Nations.

Related News

Earlier, the head of the Sanaa delegation Mohammad Abdul Salam said they “held intensive meetings with the Saudi side, during which it discussed some options and alternatives to overcome the [contended issues] that stopped [negotiations] at the previous round” and confirmed that “the delegation will raise them to [Sanaa’s] leadership for consultation.”

He also praised “the efforts being made by the brothers in the Sultanate of Oman to support peace and end the humanitarian crisis” in Yemen.

Abdul Salam said these negotiations aim to “help speed up the employees’ access to their salary, and address the humanitarian situation that the Yemeni people are suffering from,” in order to reach a just, comprehensive, and sustainable solution.

It is worth noting that the Sanaa delegation returned Tuesday to Yemen following five-day talks in Riyadh.

The Minister of Information in the Sanaa government, Daifallah al-Shami, confirmed last Friday to Al Mayadeen that the Sanaa delegation’s visit to Riyadh was not due to a Saudi invitation, but rather through Omani mediation.

Al-Shami indicated that the visit to Riyadh was a gesture of goodwill by Sanaa.

Al-Shami revealed that the circumstances surrounding Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman’s visit to Muscat indicate that he was the one who asked Oman to take the initiative regarding the Sanaa delegation’s visit to Riyadh.

The Yemeni Minister pointed out that Saudi Arabia is trying to present itself as a mediator in the Yemen war, but this will not succeed, because Riyadh continues to lead the aggression against its neighbor.

He underlined that Sanaa will not allow for humanitarian issues to be sidelined during negotiations, noting that Saudi Arabia holds the key to ending the war on Yemen.

Read more: Sanaa: Final round of peace talks with KSA in Riyadh

Related Videos

A military parade by the Yemeni Armed Forces: a new strategic weapons arsenal and the participation of warplanes
Washington and Riyadh acknowledge Yemen’s victory

Related News

السعودية تزداد «تواضعاً» والإمارات ناقِمة | مفاوضات الرياض: اتفاق «إنساني» شبه ناجز

الخميس 21 أيلول 2023

اليمن

 لقمان عبد الله

عاد وفد حركة «أنصار الله» المفاوض، مساء أوّل من أمس، برفقة الوسيط العماني إلى صنعاء، حيث سيتشاور مع قيادته، بعد أن أمضى خمسة أيام في الرياض في مفاوضة مسؤولين سعوديين حول وقف الحرب في اليمن. وبينما أوحت أوساط الطرفَين بأن تقدّماً حصل في الملفّ الإنساني، وأن وجهات النظر باتت متقاربة جدّاً، وأن توقيع الاتفاق صار رهن موافقة القيادات السياسية في البلدَين، أفادت مصادر مطّلعة، «الأخبار»، بأن ثمّة تفاهماً على الانتقال إلى الملفَّين السياسي والاقتصادي، بعد تنفيذ الخطوات الإنسانية.

وكانت جرت المفاوضات بين الجانبَين السعودي واليمني في الرياض في ظلّ اتفاق طرفَيها على إبقاء تفاصيلها طيّ الكتمان، وعدم تسريب أيّ معلومات حولها إلى وسائل الإعلام، وهو ما يدلّ على حرصهما على نجاحها، ولو بشكل جزئي. هذا في الشكل، أمّا في المضمون، فإن السقوف المرسومة من قِبَل كلا الطرفَين المتحاربَين لا تزال عالية جدّاً، فيما لا يمكن في الوقت الراهن تجاوز معظمها، بالنظر إلى أن ظروف كلّ منهما لا تسمح بالتنازل عنها مهما تعرّض له من ضغوط. لكن المفاوضات لا تَجري على قاعدة كلّ شي أو لا شيء؛ ولذا، وفي محاولة للهروب من السقوف العالية، تمّت تجزئة الملفات، وأُعطيت الأولوية للملفّ الإنساني، بالإضافة إلى وقف إطلاق النار.

على أيّ حال، يمكن القول إن الرهان الأميركي – الغربي والسعودي – الخليجي على إخضاع «أنصار الله» أصبح من الماضي، وإن ما انتُزع من قِبَل الحركة قياساً إلى قوّة التحالف الذي قاد الحرب ضدّها، يُعتبر نصراً. وإذ تدرك أطراف هذا التحالف أن المفاوضات تَجري في ظلّ قرار متَّخذ في صنعاء بالإبقاء على حالة الجهوزيّة، وتفعيل الرسائل النارية سواءً بالتدرّج أو على شكل دفعة واحدة، إذا لم تتمّ الاستجابة للمطالب الإنسانية، فقد تولّدت قناعة لديها، وإنْ متأخّرة جدّاً، بأن تلك الاستجابة إنّما هي البوّابة الحقيقية والوحيدة للولوج إلى عملية السلام، التي ستبقى قضاياها الرئيسة المتّصلة بالحلّ النهائي، معلّقةً إلى حين توفّر ظروف مختلفة أو حصول تغيّر جذري في الظروف السياسية والعسكرية المتعلّقة بالقضية اليمنية أو قضايا إقليمية مؤثّرة فيها. بمعنى آخر، ولأن أيّاً من الطرفَين ليس قادراً، حالياً، على فرض كامل رؤيته على الطرف الآخر، فإن هدف «أنصار الله» من المفاوضات الراهنة ينحصر في تحصيل الحقوق الإنسانية الأساسية، فيما محاولة السعودية المستمرّة تلبّس لبوس الوسيط ما بين الفرقاء اليمنيين، يظلّ مقدوراً على معالجتها بالنسبة إلى الحركة. في هذا الوقت، وعلى رغم التواصل بين ولي العهد السعودي، محمد بن سلمان، ورئيس دولة الإمارات، محمد بن زايد، في «قمة العشرين»، وكذلك حصول تعاون ثلاثي بشأن اليمن يضمّ واشنطن والرياض وأبو ظبي، فإن الأخيرة لا تزال تشعر بالتهميش والإقصاء في خضمّ الديناميات السياسية الجارية حالياً. وفي السياق، تحدّثت صحيفة «فايننشال تايمز»، في تقرير، عن مخاوف أميركية من أن يؤدّي الخلاف الإماراتي – السعودي إلى إفشال مفاوضات الرياض، كاشفةً أن الولايات المتحدة تعمل على تقريب وجهات النظر بين السعودية والإمارات، وتعمل على عقد لقاء ثلاثي يضمّها إليهما لحلّ هذه المسألة. ونقلت الصحيفة عن مصادر مطّلعة قولها إن المبعوث الأميركي الخاص باليمن، تيموثي ليندركينغ، هو من يقود المبادرة التي أدّت، بالفعل، أمس، إلى عقد محادثات ثلاثية بين وزراء الخارجية السعودي، فيصل بن فرحان، والإماراتي عبد الله بن زايد، والأميركي أنتوني بلينكن، لبحث الأزمة اليمنية، على هامش اجتماعات الجمعية العامة للأمم المتحدة في نيويورك، فيما أكد مسؤولون في صنعاء أن الأخيرة غير معنيّة بالتباين الواضح بين الرياض وأبو ظبي.

الإعلام الإماراتي يتّهم السعودية ضمناً بأنها تعطي حركة «أنصار الله» ما لم تحقّقه في الحرب


وتخشى الإمارات من توصّل السعودية إلى اتفاق مع «أنصار الله»، وهي، على ما يبدو، تعدّ حلفاءها لجولة جديدة من النزاع، ترى أنها قادمة حتى لو جرى إبرام اتفاق. في المقابل، شهدت المقاربة السعودية للحرب، انقلاباً تامّاً؛ فبعدما كانت المملكة ترفض الجلوس مع الحركة أصلاً، تواضع سقفها في مرحلة لاحقة إلى نزع سلاحها، ولا سيما الصاروخي منه، ومعالجة القضايا الحدودية. كذلك، وبعدما كانت السعودية تتحدّث عن قبول «أنصار الله» كواحد من خمسة مكوّنات رئيسة في البلد، إذ بها تتراجع بالتدريج عبر الوقت، وصولاً إلى إجراء مفاوضات مباشرة مع الحركة، عنوانها الملفّ الإنساني المطروح من قِبل الأخيرة منذ سنوات. والمتابع لما يُكتب في الصحف السعودية هذه الأيام، يقرأ بالضبط ما كان يُكتب في الصحف اليمنية حول ضرورة فكّ الارتباط بين الملفّات، وفصل الملفّ الإنساني عن غيره، وإنْ بقيت الأدبيات السعودية، وبيانات الدول الخليجية الحليفة لها، تتمسّك لفظياً بالمرجعيات الثلاث التي تجاوزتها الأحداث الميدانية وموازين القوى على الأرض، في محاولة، على ما يَظهر، للحفاظ على ماء الوجه ليس إلّا.

وبينما لا يبدو، هذه المرّة، أن ثمّة تبايناً كبيراً بين القوى الغربية، وعلى رأسها الولايات المتحدة، وبين السعودية، لا بل ظهرت حماسة أميركية للمفاوضات من خلال البيانَين الصادرَين عن مجلس الأمن القومي ووزارة الخارجية، واللذين رحّبا بزيارة وفد صنعاء للرياض، يَظهر مجدّداً، كما منذ بدأت المملكة البحث عن مخرج من الحرب، أن دافعها الرئيس إلى ذلك، هو بحثها عن الاستقرار الذي يفيدها في مسعاها إلى أن تكون اللاعب الأول في منطقة الشرق الأوسط، وتعزيز موقعها كمركز مالي، وهو المركز الذي تحتلّه الإمارات منذ وقت طويل. وتحاول السعودية، في هذا الإطار، ابتزاز الولايات المتحدة لتحصيل مكاسب تؤهّلها للقيام بدور الوكيل المميّز، إلى جانب إسرائيل؛ ولذا، فلا يقف جدول طلباتها من واشنطن عند حدّ معين، بل هو مفتوح على القطاعات كافة، إلى حدّ أن ما كان طرحه في السابق نوعاً من الخيال، من قَبيل الاقتصاد المتفوق والتكنولوجيا والبرنامج النووي، أصبح محور تداول اليوم.

باختصار، يتركّز همّ الرياض الأساسي على انتزاع التفوّق من دبي؛ ومن هنا، يمكن فهم تشكيك الإعلام الإماراتي في نجاح المفاوضات، وأحياناً اتهام السعودية ضمناً بأنها تعطي حركة «أنصار الله» ما لم تحقّقه في الحرب. أمّا واشنطن، فاللافت أنها تبدي استعداداً لتجاوز السقوف السابقة في علاقتها مع الرياض، والقبول بما كانت ترفضه سابقاً، وخصوصاً أن بعض المطالب السعودية ليس من شأنه الإضرار بمصالح الولايات المتحدة في المنطقة.

مقالات ذات صلة

Saudi made offer to Yemen to extend armistice: Exclusive

July 23, 2023

Source: Al Mayadeen

Yemeni supreme political council chief Mahdi Al-Mashat says Saudi Arabia made an astounding offer to Yemen to have the armistice extended.

Yemeni Supreme Political Council President Mahdi Al-Mashat

By Al Mayadeen English

Sanaa received an offer from Saudi Arabia in January by which Riyadh would cover the salary of workers for an entire year in exchange for the renewal of the armistice and the resumption of the export of Yemeni oil, informed sources told Al Mayadeen on Saturday.

Sanaa “demanded that Saudi Arabia stop imposing controls on the export of Yemeni oil and enable the Yemeni people to utilize their rights to their wealth,” Al Mayadeen‘s sources said.

“The revenues from Yemeni oil exports are sufficient to cover the salaries of all employees,” Yemeni officials underlined.

Yemeni Supreme Political Council President Mahdi Al-Mashat had last year sent official letters to all companies and entities concerned with the looting of Yemeni sovereign wealth to completely stop its plunder.

In turn, the Supreme Economic Committee of the Sanaa government sent a notice to all companies and entities demanding that they permanently stop looting the Yemeni sovereign wealth.

Moreover, Al-Mashat has been promising workers to pay their salaries from Saudi Arabia since 2016, when the Aden government at the time, in cooperation with the Saudi-led coalition, transferred the Central Bank of Yemen from Sanaa to Aden, and stopped paying the dues of Yemeni workers.

Regarding the latest developments in negotiations between the Sanaa government and Saudi Arabia, Al-Mashat revealed that the negotiations reached the talks about handing over the salaries from the oil and gas wealth to Yemen.

“Saudi Arabia expressed its willingness to pay the employees’ salaries as a charity gesture, not from Yemen’s oil and gas revenues,” he stressed. 

During a speech at the inauguration of the new academic year, Al-Mashat said, “The negotiations focused on the point of handing over the salaries from our oil and gas wealth. The Saudis were ready to pay them from their funds, not from our wealth. What the Saudis want is to steal our oil and gas wealth and transfer it to the Saudi National Bank, then pretend to donate it to our people’s employees, and this is what we refused.”

Al-Mashat also mentioned that “the United States insisted on Saudi Arabia not to pay the dues.” Sanaa advised the Americans “not to build an enemy in every Yemeni household because by preventing the payment of employees’ salaries, they would have over 10 million Yemenis who resent them,” he added.

He had stressed that the Yemeni people and Sanaa government would continue down the path they are heading with resilience to achieve freedom and independence, warning that “all the enemy’s measures aim to multiply the suffering, and it wants to incite the society.”

He cautioned the Saudi-led coalition that if they persist in their obstinacy, they would lose opportunities, knowing how much they have already lost and how much more they will lose.

Related Articles

Yemen warns Saudi Arabia against ‘procrastinating’ ending war

May 15 2023

(Photo credit: AFP)

The Yemeni official also lauded the resistance’s recent victory against Israel, and warned the coalition that Tel Aviv cannot protect it

ByNews Desk

During a march of solidarity with the Palestinian people on 14 May, a member of the Sanaa government’s Supreme Political Council, Muhammad Ali al-Houthi, accused the Saudi-led coalition of “procrastinating” with its recent promises to end the war and lift the blockade against Yemen.

Houthi said during the march that the Yemeni people must remain “vigilant and constantly prepared.”

“The enemy has so far been procrastinating in stopping the aggression and lifting the siege on Yemen,” he said.

In recent months, Saudi Arabia has been involved in Omani-mediated peace talks with the Ansarallah resistance movement, which have resulted in some progress, including a prisoner exchange, as well as agreements on an eventual lifting of the blockade against Hodeidah port and Sanaa International Airport.

Saudi Arabia has also agreed to pay the salaries of all government employees in the territories of the National Salvation Government (NSG) in Sanaa, among other things.

However, as obstruction of peace efforts by Washington and the UAE continue, Saudi Arabia’s newfound willingness to end the war has been overshadowed – and recently, the coalition has resumed its violations of efforts to solidify a truce by launching border attacks and shelling regions such as Saada province and other areas.

Meanwhile, Ansarallah has maintained its siege over the strategic southwestern province of Taiz.

“We see Saudi Arabia and the UAE today, broken in the face of Yemen … it sees the Iron Dome [in Israel] and how it failed to protect the Zionists. So how can they [the Zionists] protect the normalizing countries, now?” Houthi said, referencing the malfunctions in Israel’s Iron Dome defense system during recent rocket fire on the occupied territories in last week’s battle.

Ansarallah has repeatedly warned that if peace efforts fail, it is prepared for all out war against the coalition, and is ready to strike the depths of both Saudi Arabia and the UAE with missiles.

During the march, Houthi also renewed Ansarallah’s support for the Palestinian cause and resistance, and declared its readiness to confront Israel.

“We affirm, as the Yemeni people, our loyalty to Palestine …  we are present for actual and direct participation,” he added.

The Ansarallah movement is known to possess missiles that are capable of reaching Israel, including the Zulfiqar missile, which it has used against Saudi Arabia in the past.

Related Videos

Will Saudi Arabia survive by itself…? Or follow American behavior and burn
Who arrived at Sanaa airport…? What is the reason for the delay of the flight until today? Watch to know everything 10-25-1444
Dangerous messages of concern to the entire world…in the speech of President Al-Mashat during the expanded meeting in Hajjah Governorate 10-25-1444
Millions marches in a number of Yemeni cities under the title “Revenge of the Free” in solidarity with Gaza
Why did these large crowds come out in the Yemeni capital, Sana’a?
Woe to the Jews from the crowds waiting for the leader’s signal… The capital, Sana’a 10-24-1444
The slogan of Ansar Allah!! Event guides and messages.

Related Articles

حوار بين الرياض وحزب الله عبر طرف ثالث؟

 السبت 29 نيسان 2023

نقولا ناصيف

غير المُقال في زيارة وزير الخارجية الإيراني حسين أمير عبد اللهيان أهمّ مما قيل. المُقال المعتاد، منه خصوصاً في أكثر من زيارة، دعم حكومته لبنان والجيش والمقاومة، واستعدادها تقديم مساعدات في قطاعات حيوية شتّى، وحضّه اللبنانيين على الاتفاق

(هيثم الموسوي)

غير المُقال في زيارة الوزير الإيراني أكثر أهمية تبعاً لتقاطع معلومات لدى أكثر من عاصمة، منها بيروت. غير المُقال هذا لم يُثَر في اللقاءات الرسمية، بل في الاجتماع الذي أُعلِن أن حسين أمير عبد اللهيان عقده أول من أمس مع الأمين العام لحزب الله السيد حسن نصر الله. فحوى الاهتمام بتوقيت الزيارة، المعلومات التي وصلت الى مسؤولين رسميين لبنانيين من عاصمة أوروبية، نقلاً عن «مسؤول سعودي»، بأن المملكة فتحت حواراً مع مَن عادتهم، بدءاً بإيران مروراً بسوريا ونظام الرئيس بشار الأسد و«قريباً» مع حزب الله.

معلومات غير رسمية في بيروت مُكمّلة لتلك، تحدثت متكتّمة عن التفاصيل عن أن «خط الحوار فُتح أو أوشك من خلال طرف ثالث». حصول هذا الحوار يعيد التذكير بالتواصل الأول واليتيم بين الطرفين، في لحظة إقليمية استثنائية، عندما استقبل الملك عبد الله في 4 كانون الثاني 2007 نائب الأمين العام الشيخ نعيم قاسم ونائب الحزب محمد فنيش خلال زيارتهما المملكة. بعد ذاك انقطع التواصل ودخلا في حرب إعلامية طويلة الأمد، بلغت ذروتها بعد تدخّل حزب الله في الحرب السورية.

سواء نجح المسعى أو أخفق، إلا أنه يعكس المرحلة الجديدة التي تعيد فيها الرياض ترتيب علاقاتها الإقليمية على طريق تأكيد زعامتها العربية، غير المسبوقة بزخم كهذا وحجم التحدّيات والمواجهات المعلنة وغير المعلنة التي تقودها، بدءاً من اليمن وصولاً الى لبنان ذهاباً الى الأميركيين، سوى خلال ولاية الملك فيصل بين عامَي 1963 و1975. أعلاها نبرة وثمناً باهظاً استخدامه سلاح النفط إبان الحرب العربية – الإسرائيلية عام 1973.

مع أن الزائر الإيراني لم يشأ الخوض في انتخابات الرئاسة اللبنانية مع مستقبليه، بمَن فيهم مَن فاتحوه فيها وطلبوا مساعدة حكومته، إلا أنه أعاد تأكيد أنها لا تتدخّل في الشؤون اللبنانية. الشقّ الآخر الذي لم يُفصح عنه علناً غير أنه سُمِع مراراً وتكراراً في طهران كما في دمشق، وهو أن كلتا العاصمتين المعنيتين بطريقة أو أخرى بالشأن اللبناني أكدتا أكثر من مرة أن ملف لبنان – بما فيه استحقاقه الرئاسي – بين يدَي حزب الله وأمينه العام بالذات كمرجعية وحيدة. لم تكن قد مرت أيام على سماع النائب السابق سليمان فرنجية، مرشح الثنائي الشيعي، الكلام نفسه من الأسد حاضّاً إياه على التنسيق مع نصر الله. في ما مضى، سمع العبارة نفسها رئيس حكومة تصريف الأعمال نجيب ميقاتي في 21 أيلول المنصرم لدى لقائه في نيويورك، على هامش اجتماعات الجمعية العمومية للأمم المتحدة، الرئيس الإيراني إبراهيم رئيسي، مطالباً إياه بالمساعدة على إنجاز الاستحقاق الوشيك آنذاك. مع أن ولاية الرئيس ميشال عون لم تكن قد انتهت ولا وقع الشغور، إلا أن رئيسي أخطر ميقاتي أن حكومته لا تتدخل في الشأن اللبناني.

تلك إشارة ضمنية تدلّ على المكان الصائب في حسبان الإيرانيين للتفاوض معه في انتخاب الرئيس، وهو حزب الله.

في ايران كما في سوريا موقف مشترك معمّم: راجعوا حزب الله


على أن الإشارات الإيجابية الدائرة في المنطقة لا تشي بالضرورة أن لبنان على طاولة التفاوض، أو في أحسن الأحوال يُنظر الى ملفّه على قدم المساواة مع الملفات الرئيسية المفتوحة مذ أعلن اتفاق بكين بين السعودية وإيران، كاليمن وسوريا قبل انفجار السودان كأول تعبير سلبي يجبه التحولات الأخيرة ويعيد السخونة الى المنطقة برمتها.
بذلك مأزق الرئاسة مستمر الى أمد غير معروف لأسباب شتى:

أولا- رغم رسائل التطمين التي أرسلها فرنجية هذا الأسبوع الى المملكة ومناهضيه المسيحيين، محتمياً بقوة صلبة تقف الى جانبه هي الثنائي الشيعي، إلا أن القوة المقابلة له ليست أقل صلابة، سواء في عدم اتخاذ الرياض موقفاً إيجابياً من انتخابه، فيما الفرنسيون يتخبّطون بين الأوهام والأحلام. ليست الكتل المسيحية المناوئة لانتخاب فرنجية أقل تأثيراً من الثنائي في منع انتخابه. لا تراجع لكتلتَي النائب جبران باسيل وسمير جعجع عن رفض القبول بفرنجية. بينما قطع الأول المسافة الصعبة في الخلاف وربما القطيعة مع حزب الله في الإصرار على هذا الرفض، لا يجد الثاني صعوبة في الذهاب الى أكثر من تباين في الرأي مع المملكة إذا بَانَ أنها قد تحطّ في نهاية المطاف عند الزعيم الزغرتاوي.

الى الآن على الأقل، ليست متأهّبة لقلب موازين القوى في الداخل رأساً على عقب، ولا تبدو أنها تميل الى خيار كهذا في الظاهر. أن لا تقول الرياض إنها ضد فرنجية لا يفضي الى استنتاج صائب سليم أنها معه أو ستصبح معه قريباً.

ثانيا – لم تُضف تطمينات فرنجية الى الوقائع الحالية ما يعزّز حظوظه، المتقدمة في أي حال سواه دونما تمكينه من الوصول الى المنصب. لا يملك أقوى المرشحين من خلال الثنائي الشيعي وحلفائه الأكثرية المطلقة ولا الثلثين لفرض الانتخاب، ولا يملك كذلك خصومه أيّاً منهما. للرياض نصف المقاعد السنّية وهو سبب كافٍ كي لا تكون عاملاً مقرراً لانعقاد جلسة الانتخاب بالثلثين. أضعف الأفرقاء المهتمّين بالاستحقاق باريس. لا تملك مقعداً واحداً في البرلمان، ولا مَلَكَة المَوْنة على كتلة ما. مع أنها توحي بالظهور أنها قائدة حملة إخراج لبنان من شغوره، بيد أنها الطرف الأعزل العالق في غابة وحوش. وحده انضمام الأميركيين الى المعادلة الداخلية، بتفاهم أو غض طرف مع الثنائي الشيعي، يأتي بـ 86 نائباً على الأقل الى القاعة.

ثالثا – إذا صحّ أن السعودية وإيران تتعاملان مع ملفات المنطقة، كل على حدة، منفصل بعضها عن بعض، إلا أن الإشكالية اللبنانية الحالية بشقّيْها السياسي والطائفي تحتّم مقاربة ما بدأ في اليمن، مع ما يفترض أن يجري في لبنان: ما لم يسَع إيران أن تفعله وهو أن لا تعطي السعودية اليمن بلا الحوثيين، لا تملك أن تأخذ في لبنان في معزل عن المسيحيين. ليست المعادلة هذه إلا تأكيداً على الاعتراف المتبادل بالأحجام الواقعية الملزمة: أن يكون الحوثيون معترفاً بهم ومفاوِضين ومفاوَضين مع المملكة على أنهم شركاء في بناء نظام جديد للبلاد تلك، وأن يكون المسيحيون اللبنانيون هم الشركاء الفعليين في النظام اللبناني، وخصوصاً موقعهم ودورهم وخياراتهم في رئاسة الدولة.
لأن استقرار اليمن يتطلب شراكة حقيقية للحوثيين، المسار نفسه لاستقرار لبنان بالاعتراف بشراكة حقيقية للمسيحيين فيه.

Sudan crisis is extension of that in Yemen: Al-Bukhaiti to Al Mayadeen

25 Apr 2023

Source: Al Mayadeen Net

By Al Mayadeen English 

Al-Bukhaiti says had the Sudanese army commanders not been involved in the war on Yemen, this wouldn’t have happened in Sudan.

Member of the political bureau of the Ansar Allah movement Mohammad Al-Bukhaiti

Member of the political bureau of the Ansar Allah movement, Mohammad Al-Bukhaiti, considered on Monday that the Sudan crisis is an extension of the Yemeni crisis.

In an interview for Al Mayadeen, Al-Bukhaiti pointed out that “had the army commanders not been involved in the war on Yemen, this wouldn’t have happened in Sudan, especially since those fighting in Sudan now were involved in fighting in Yemen before.”

Al-Bukhaiti regretted the inability of the Sanaa government to provide aid to the Yemenis in Sudan due to the aggression, the blockade, and the situation forced onto the Sanaa government.

He also highlighted the Sudanese government’s relationship with the forces of aggression and not with the Sanaa government.

Read more: Era of guardianship over Yemen is over: Sanaa MoD

The Yemeni official indicated that recent visits of the Saudi delegation to Sanaa “broke many barriers that constituted an obstacle to any negotiations,” explaining that many achievements have been made, yet without reaching an agreement on a complete and comprehensive peace.

According to Al-Bukhaiti, many matters were agreed upon with the Saudi delegation, especially with regard to the humanitarian situation.

He said that Sanaa is waiting for the implementation of what was agreed upon, warning against procrastination, because the situation of the Yemeni people no longer allows any delay in the implementation of the agreed points.

He also noted that the negotiations with the Saudis were halted due to the Eid Al-Fitr holiday, affirming that these negotiations “will be resumed soon.”

Al-Bukhaiti mentioned that Sanaa and Riyadh are now in a stage of de-escalation, but he affirmed that Saudi Arabia and the UAE realize that any escalation will be met with escalation, and this will not be in their interest.

The Ansar Allah official specified that “negotiations with the Saudis at this stage are based on re-opening the airports and ports, set to be finalized in later stages to achieve a permanent and comprehensive peace.”

Al-Bukhaiti considered that the Yemeni internal dialogue should include all Yemeni political components and figures that have popular bases, noting that the individuals and militias directly linked to Saudi Arabia and the UAE will attempt to obstruct reaching any solution, which, if reached, will cause them to lose their jobs with whoever hired them.

Al-Bukhaiti revealed to Al Mayadeen that during the negotiations, emphasis was placed on the withdrawal of all foreign forces from Yemen and on Yemen’s restoration of its sovereignty over all of its lands.

“Peace means the exit of the American forces from the occupied Yemeni provinces… We do not accept any foreign presence in Yemen, and we will be in direct confrontation with any foreign military forces present on Yemeni soil,” he underlined.

Al-Bukhaiti warned that the United States does not want peace in Yemen, adding that Washington had a negative impact on the negotiations between Sanaa and Riyadh.

It is noteworthy that this month, Yemen witnessed three batches of prisoner exchange deals. Earlier, the Sanaa government revealed arrangements to hold a new round of negotiations to discuss the release of 1,400 Yemeni prisoners with the Saudi-backed government in May.

The government said a future deal that included 700 prisoners will be concluded.

Read more: Aggression countries will ‘inevitably’ lose if they escalate: Sanaa

Stand with Yemen

For the past seven years, Yemen has been enduring an aggression by the Saudi-led coalition that butchers civilians on a daily basis, destroys civilian infrastructure and residential areas, and starves innocent Yemenis – all amid international silence and complicity. It is time for this war to end… Yemen can’t wait any longer…

Related Stories

Ramadan Deal Sees More Than 350 Yemenis Liberated from Saudi Prisons

 April 15, 2023

A flight carrying Yemeni detainees from Saudi Arabia on Saturday heading for Yemen’s capital Sanaa has arrived as part of a large-scale, multi-day exchange that comes as peace talks have raised hopes for an end to Yemen’s eight-year-old war.

On Friday, 318 prisoners were transported on four flights between government-controlled Aden and the Houthi-held capital, reuniting with their families ahead of next week’s Muslim holiday of Eid al-Fitr. Among those freed were Yemen’s former defense minister and the brother of the ex-president.

On Saturday, at least three buses took the prisoners to the airport in Abha. Wheelchairs were positioned near the buses to take some of the prisoners to the plane. The ICRC has planned three flights for Saturday between Saudi Arabia and Yemen.

Details on the Batch

The first plane of the second batch of liberated prisoners arrived at Sana’a International Airport, carrying more than 125 prisoners, amid a popular and official reception. Then, the second plane arrived from the Mocha area, carrying 44 liberated prisoners. The flight departed before 9 am (0600 GMT) from the southern Saudi city of Abha. The International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) ICRC has said that nearly 900 detainees are expected to be released as part of the operation.

According to Majid Fadail, spokesman for the government delegation negotiating the exchange, sixteen Saudis and three Sudanese were expected to be transferred from Sanaa to Riyadh on Saturday.

In addition, 100 Houthis were due to be flown on three flights to Sanaa from Mokha on the Red Sea coast, a town held by the coalition-backed government.

The head of the Yemeni Prisoners Affairs Committee, Abdul Qadir Al-Murtada, also stated that a plane carrying over 100 prisoners was coming from Abha Airport in Khamis Mushait, with three flights on board planes belonging to the International Red Cross that will transport prisoners from Khamis Mushait and Al-Mokha. He mentioned that 15 Saudi captives, two Sudanese captives, and two mercenaries would be transferred to Saudi Arabia in this exchange batch. Al-Murtada expressed Sanaa’s willingness to enter into a comprehensive deal to exchange all for all and promised all families of remaining prisoners in the enemy’s prisons that they will continue their efforts until all prisoners are liberated.

Al-Murtada expressed Sanaa’s willingness to enter into a comprehensive deal to exchange all for all and promised all families of remaining prisoners in the enemy’s prisons that they will continue their efforts until all prisoners are liberated.

Confidence-Building Measure

The prisoner exchange is a confidence-building measure coinciding with an intense diplomatic push to end Yemen’s war, which has resulted in hundreds of thousands of deaths due to violence, food insecurity, and lack of access to healthcare.

“The exchange process is a great message sent by the Yemeni leadership that it is from the people and for the people, according to Secretary-General of the Presidency of the Republic in Yemen,” Hassan Sharaf al-Din, in a statement to Al-Masirah TV.

He emphasized that Saudi Arabia, the Emirates (UAE), and the mercenaries were involved in the aggression and could not evade the consequences of this war.

In recent developments concerning Yemen’s ongoing conflict, a top Yemeni official clarified that the negotiation to end the aggression and occupation and lift the blockade is solely between Sanaa and the “countries of aggression.” Furthermore, any political solution that follows will be an internal matter handled by Yemenis themselves.

Saudi Arabia’s Ambassador to Yemen, Mohammed Saeed Al Jaber, visited Sanaa, where he stated that his purpose was to consolidate the current armistice, establish a ceasefire, back a prisoner swap deal, and discuss the means of dialogue between various Yemeni political groups. His ultimate goal is to reach a comprehensive and sustainable political solution in Yemen.

For years, Yemen has been embroiled in a bloody conflict that has caused untold suffering for its people. With multiple factions vying for control, the country has been divided along political and religious lines, and the violence has only intensified. The blockade by the Saudi coalition has worsened the situation, leading to a humanitarian crisis and famine.

Despite international calls for peace, the conflict has persisted with no clear end in sight. It remains to be seen if these recent diplomatic efforts will lead to any tangible progress towards ending the crisis in Yemen. However, with both sides engaging in dialogue, there is hope that a solution can be reached that will bring lasting peace and prosperity to the war-torn nation.

Hezbollah Secretary General Sayyed Hasan Nasrallah hailed in his Al-Quds Day speech on Friday the Saudi-Yemeni deal, emphasizing that Yemen, “which we have supported since the beginning of the war in 2015, is witnessing positive developments pertaining the peace talks,” noting that this would leave positive effects on the axis of resistance, Palestine and Al-Quds.

Source: Al-Manar English Website

Related Videos

Special Coverage | An official and popular reception in Yemen for the liberated families
Moments that capture hearts and consciences… The families are waiting for their captive children – Sana’a Airport
A large official and popular reception for the liberated prisoners from the prisons of aggression at Sana’a International Airport
Scenes of the moments of the liberated prisoners’ arrival and their families receiving them | identity channel
Watch the moment a mother receives her captive son

Related News

Syria Rising from the Ashes of Twelve Years of Hybrid War

Posted by INTERNATIONALIST 360° 

Vanessa Beeley

I talk with Syrian journalist and analyst Kevork Almassian about the recent seismic events in Syria starting with the earthquake on February 6th and culminating in some unexpected and positive geopolitical shifts towards a new Pan-Arabism in the region.

We discuss what the US, UK and Israel can do to prevent normalisation of trade and economic relations between Syria and former US/UK/Israel-allies in the destabilisation project that began in 2011. The US occupation will end sooner or later and while Israel flexes its military muscles for war it knows it is faced with an unprecedented Resistance unity and military prowess in the region that threatens its existence. Turkey is painting itself into a very tight corner – which way will it turn, East or West? All these questions are discussed in depth.

Yemen and Saudi Arabia Meet to End War

 

Mohammad Ali Al-Houthi, member of the Supreme Political Council in Yemen

Posted by INTERNATIONALIST 360° 


Saudi delegation arrives in Sanaa to discuss details of the final peace plan with member of the Supreme Political Council Mohammad Ali Al-Houthi on Sunday.

A Saudi delegation traveled to Sanaa to meet with high-ranking officials from the Ansar Allah movement to discuss further details of the final ceasefire agreement and the end of the 8-year Saudi-led war on Yemen.

The delegation arrived on Saturday evening and held talks with Mohammad Ali Al-Houthi, a senior member of Yemen’s Supreme Political Council and important figures of the National Salvation Government of Yemen.

Pictures were circulated in Yemeni media outlets today, showing a Saudi official shaking hands with Al-Houthi. The Saudis reportedly asked for their identities to remain secret in the meantime.

According to sources of Yemen’s Saba news agency, issues such as the “removal of the tight naval and air blockade on Yemen, an end to the eight-year-long aggression, the restoration of Yemeni national rights, the payment of civil servant salaries, and payments related to oil and gas revenues,” were discussed with Mahdi Al-Mashat, the Chairman of the Supreme Political Council.

The recent visit adds to the diplomatic efforts taken by both sides.

Omani Mediation

On April 8, Saudi Arabia’s Ambassador to Yemen, Mohammed Saeed Al-Jaber met with members of the National Salvation Government and the Ansar Allah movement under Omani mediation.

Sources told Al Mayadeen on April 8 that the meeting is part of the effort to extend the armistice between the two parties and lift the blockade on Hudaydah port.

The Omani and Saudi team met with the head of the Sanaa delegation, negotiator Mohammad Abdul Salam, who said, “We hope that this will be achieved, that the damage will be remedied, and efforts will be crowned with a peace agreement that meets the demands of our dear Yemeni people, from Saada to Mahra.”

Informed Yemeni sources revealed on Friday that Saudi officials met with the Yemeni Presidential Leadership Council to inform them of their decision to end the war and conclude the Yemeni file permanently.

The officials also detailed a two-year transitional period which includes a future form of the state and the ruling government. The sources added that the Saudi vision for a solution comes in accordance with its understanding of Sanaa which is still being discussed and is almost final.

The UAE is Unbothered

The UAE, which occupies strategic Yemeni territory including the Socotra island, has not made any diplomatic initiative yet.

Mohammad Al Bukhaiti told Al Mayadeen on Friday that Sanaa will “not allow the presence of any UAE forces on any inch of Yemeni territory.”

However, Al Bukhaiti also stated that Sanaa supports “proposals and efforts by Saudi Arabia or other parties to pacify the Yemeni crisis and reach a comprehensive political resolution to the conflict.”

This might indicate a possible rift between the Gulf countries’ approach to the Yemen war.

Improved Saudi Iranian Relations

Regional conflicts have begun to ease after China mediated diplomatic talks between Iran and Saudi Arabia in early March.

Talks between the two countries produced the first meeting between the Foreign Ministers of both countries in 7 years.

China played a crucial role in the restoration of ties between the two countries. However, it is speculated that the success of Ansar Allah in Yemen has pushed Saudi Arabia to the negotiation table after 8 tormenting years of what was supposed to be a quick military victory for the country.

Al Mayadeen

Iran and Saudi Arabia: a Chinese win-win

April 07 2023

The single Iranian-Saudi handshake buried trillions of dollars of western divide-and-rule investments across West Asia, and has global leaders rushing to Beijing for global solutions.

https://media.thecradle.co/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/IMG_20230407_153412_475.jpg
Photo Credit: The Cradle
Pepe Escobar is a columnist at The Cradle, editor-at-large at Asia Times and an independent geopolitical analyst focused on Eurasia. Since the mid-1980s he has lived and worked as a foreign correspondent in London, Paris, Milan, Los Angeles, Singapore and Bangkok. He is the author of countless books; his latest one is Raging Twenties. 

By Pepe Escobar

The idea that History has an endpoint, as promoted by clueless neoconservatives in the unipolar 1990s, is flawed, as it is in an endless process of renewal. The recent official meeting between Saudi Foreign Minister Faisal bin Farhan al-Saud and Iranian Foreign Minister Hossein Amir-Abdollahian in Beijing marks a territory that was previously deemed unthinkable and which has undoubtedly caused grief for the War Inc. machine.

This single handshake signifies the burial of trillions of dollars that were spent on dividing and ruling West Asia for over four decades. Additionally, the Global War on Terror (GWOT), the fabricated reality of the new millennium, featured as prime collateral damage in Beijing.

Beijing’s optics as the capital of peace have been imprinted throughout the Global South, as evidenced by a subsequent sideshow where a couple of European leaders, a president, and a Eurocrat, arrived as supplicants to Xi Jinping, asking him to join the NATO line on the war in Ukraine. They were politely dismissed.

Still, the optics were sealed: Beijing had presented a 12-point peace plan for Ukraine that was branded “irrational” by the Washington beltway neocons. The Europeans – hostages of a proxy war imposed by Washington – at least understood that anyone remotely interested in peace needs to go through the ritual of bowing to the new boss in Beijing.

The irrelevance of the JCPOA

Tehran-Riyadh relations, of course, will have a long, rocky way ahead – from activating previous cooperation deals signed in 1998 and 2001 to respecting, in practice, their mutual sovereignty and non-interference in each other’s internal affairs.

Everything is far from solved – from the Saudi-led war on Yemen to the frontal clash of Persian Gulf Arab monarchies with Hezbollah and other resistance movements in the Levant. Yet that handshake is the first step leading, for instance, to the Saudi foreign minister’s upcoming trip to Damascus to formally invite President Bashar al-Assad to the Arab League summit in Riyadh next month.

It’s crucial to stress that this Chinese diplomatic coup started way back with Moscow brokering negotiations in Baghdad and Oman; that was a natural development of Russia stepping in to help Iran save Syria from a crossover NATO-Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) coalition of vultures.

Then the baton was passed to Beijing, in total diplomatic sync. The drive to permanently bury GWOT and the myriad, nasty ramifications of the US war of terror was an essential part of the calculation; but even more pressing was the necessity to demonstrate how the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), or Iran nuclear deal, had become irrelevant.

Both Russia and China have experienced, inside and out, how the US always manages to torpedo a return to the JCPOA, as it was conceived and signed in 2015. Their task became to convince Riyadh and GCC states that Tehran has no interest in weaponizing nuclear power – and will remain a signatory of the Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT).

Then it was up to Chinese diplomatic finesse to make it quite clear that the Persian Gulf monarchies’ fear of revolutionary Shi’ism is now as counter-productive as Tehran’s dread of being harassed and/or encircled by Salafi-jihadis. It’s as if Beijing had coined a motto: drop these hazy ideologies, and let’s do business.

And business it is, and will be: better yet, mediated by Beijing and implicitly guaranteed by both nuclear superpowers Russia and China.

Hop on the de-dollarization train

Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman (MbS) may exhibit some Soprano-like traits, but he’s no fool: he instantly saw how this Chinese offer morphed beautifully into his domestic modernization plans. A Gulf source in Moscow, familiar with MbS’ rise and consolidation of power, details the crown prince’s drive to appeal to the younger Saudi generation who idolize him. Let girls drive their SUVs, go dancing, let their hair down, work hard, and be part of the “new” Saudi Arabia of Vision 2030: a global tourism and services hub, a sort of Dubai on steroids.

And, crucially, this will also be a Eurasia-integrated Saudi Arabia; future, inevitable member of both the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) and BRICS+ – just like Iran, which will also be sitting at the same communal tables.

From Beijing’s point of view, this is all about its ambitious, multi-trillion-dollar Belt and Road Initiative (BRI). A key BRI connectivity corridor runs from Central Asia to Iran and then beyond, to the Caucasus and/or Turkey. Another one – in search of investment opportunities – runs through the Arabian Sea, the Sea of Oman, and the Persian Gulf, part of the Maritime Silk Road.

Beijing wants to develop BRI projects in both corridors: call it “peaceful modernization” applied to sustainable development. The Chinese always remember how the Ancient Silk Roads plied Persia and parts of Arabia: in this case, we have History Repeating Itself.

A geopolitical revolution

And then comes the Holy Grail: energy. Iran is a prime gas supplier to China, a matter of national security, inextricably linked to their $400 billion-plus strategic partnership deal. And Saudi Arabia is a prime oil supplier. Closer Sino-Saudi relations and interaction in key multipolar organizations such as the SCO and BRICS+ advance the fateful day when the petroyuan will be definitely enshrined.

China and the UAE have already clinched their first gas deal in yuan. The high-speed de-dollarization train has already left the station. ASEAN is already actively discussing how to bypass the dollar to privilege settlements in local currencies – something unthinkable even a few months ago. The US dollar has already been thrown into a death by a thousand cuts spiral.

And that will be the day when the game reaches a whole new unpredictable level.

The destructive agenda of the neocon leaders in charge of US foreign policy should never be underestimated. They exploited the 9/11 “new Pearl Harbor” pretext to launch a crusade against the lands of Islam in 2001, followed by a NATO proxy war against Russia in 2014. Their ultimate ambition is to wage war against China before 2025.

However, they are now facing a swift geopolitical and geoeconomic revolt of the World’s Heartland – from Russia and China to West Asia, and extrapolating to South Asia, Southeast Asia, Africa and selected latitudes in Latin America.

The turning point came on 26 February, 2022, when Washington’s neocons – in a glaring display of their shallow intellects – decided to freeze and/or steal the reserves of the only nation on the planet equipped with all the commodities that really matter, and with the necessary nous to unleash a momentous shift to a monetary system not anchored in fiat money.

That was the fateful day when the cabal, identified by journalist Seymour Hersh as responsible for blowing up the Nord Stream pipelines, actually blew the whistle for the high-speed de-dollarization train to leave the station, led by Russia, China, and now – welcome on board – Iran and Saudi Arabia.

The views expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect those of The Cradle.

Sources to Al Mayadeen: Riyadh to announce end to war on Yemen

7 Apr 2023

Source: Al Mayadeen Net + Agencies

By Al Mayadeen English 

Yemeni sources told Al Mayadeen that the Saudi vision for a solution welcomes an extension to the existing truce in Yemen for another year, in agreement with Sanaa, and reveals that it is almost final.war

This Feb. 17, 2018, photo shows a damaged theme park in Aden, Yemen. (AP)

Informed Yemeni sources reported on Friday that Saudi Arabia had summoned the head and members of the Yemeni Presidential Leadership Council on the anniversary of the Council that was announced from Riyadh.

Yemeni sources told Al Mayadeen that Riyadh briefed the president and members of the Presidential Leadership Council on its unannounced meetings with the Sanaa government.

The sources pointed out that the Saudi Defense Minister, Khalid bin Salman, briefed the head of the leadership council and members of the council on the solution for a way out of the war on Yemen during their meeting yesterday.

In turn, the Saudi ambassador to Yemen briefed the Chairman and members of the Leadership Council on the details of Riyadh’s unannounced understanding with Sanaa and their outcomes. 

The sources pointed out that the Saudi vision for the solution welcomes extending the truce in Yemen for another year, in agreement with Sanaa,” adding that “the vision provides for extending the truce in exchange for handing over [employee] salaries, unifying the currency, and opening the port of Al-Hudaydah completely.”

The sources explained that an extension of the truce with these new conditions will be followed by an official Saudi announcement of the end of the war and the cessation of its interference in Yemen.

Read next: Iran, Saudi FMs meet for the first time in seven years in Beijing

Likewise, the sources reported that after an official declaration for the end of the war, a Yemeni-Yemeni round of consultations will begin under UN supervision and Saudi sponsorship,” and that the consultations will seek to agree on a transitional phase for a period of two years.

The sources stressed that the Saudi vision is based on discussing, during the transitional period, the future form of the state and the ruling government, adding that the Saudi vision for a solution in accordance with its understanding with Sanaa is still being discussed and is almost final. 

The sources stated that Riyadh informed the Presidential Leadership Council of its decision to end the war and conclude the Yemeni file permanently.

Earlier, a member of the political bureau of the Yemeni Ansar Allah movement, Abd al-Wahhab al-Mahbashi, confirmed that the Iranian-Saudi agreement is positive, and that it will have an impact on Yemen.

Read next: Selective humanity; who stood with Yemen?

Related Videos

The big surprise! Prince Mohammed bin Salman ends the Yemen crisis once and for all and divides the government between the Houthis and the “legitimacy”

Related Stories

Syria, Yemen, Saudi Arabia, Turkiye: Truces, not peace

April 04 2023

As reconciliation efforts sweep through West Asia to mend ties between old foes, the new China- and Russia-brokered deals will not usher in real peace until the US stops prolonging conflict.

By Hasan Illaik

The mid-March Moscow summit between Syrian President Bashar al-Assad and his Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin was notable for being publicized in advance. Since the outbreak of the Syrian war, Assad’s foreign visits have not been publicly revealed until after they have occurred. This small but significant detail suggests the Syrian president has a newfound confidence in the political and security conditions outside his national borders.

While the participants kept a tight lid on leaks, informed sources from both Moscow and Damascus disclosed to The Cradle that the Syrian and Russian presidents discussed the following issues:

Economic ties: With a focus on Syria’s energy sector, Putin expressed Russia’s readiness to invest in the production of electricity in the Levantine state, which post-conflict, suffers from a 75 percent deficit in production. Putin also expressed Moscow’s willingness to help Syria meet its vital grain needs.

Relations with Turkiye: While in Moscow, Assad reportedly refused to hold a four-way meeting between the deputy foreign ministers of Syria, Turkiye, Russia, and Iran. The Syrian president reiterated that Turkiye occupies Syrian lands, and negotiations between the two countries cannot advance from the security to the political level without a clear and public pledge from Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan to withdraw his military forces from the occupied territories, and open the main roads linking Syrian provinces – particularly the Latakia-Aleppo road, known as the M4 highway.

However, Moscow pressed its case, and reportedly reached an agreement between Damascus and Ankara stipulating that their negotiations would continue and move to the political level, with the main item on the table being Turkish withdrawal from Syrian lands. The basis for a much-awaited summit between Assad and Erdogan will be discussed at a later date.

The sources say that, for domestic political purposes, Erdogan needs to meet Assad before Turkiye’s May presidential elections, to convey to voters that he seeks to stop the war at his country’s southern borders, intends to repatriate the approximately three million Syrian refugees back home – a hot topic for voters – and to assure the Turkish Alevi electorate that he is not hostile to their sect, to which his rival Kemal Kilicdaroglu belongs.

Relations with Saudi Arabia: Putin, who has been leading the mediation efforts to normalize Saudi-Syrian relations, briefed Assad on the results of his talks with Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman (MbS). According to official sources in Damascus and Moscow, Putin’s initiative has made progress in reactivating critical communication between Damascus and Riyadh.

Saudi Arabia’s strategic shifts

On 23 March, 2023, the Saudi Ministry of Foreign Affairs announced the start of talks with Syria to reactivate consular work, which is a prelude to the return of normal diplomatic relations between the two countries, as reported by Saudi daily Al-Sharq Al-Awsat.

Sources speaking to The Cradle have confirmed that any potential progress in Syrian-Saudi relations are the result of these Russian mediation efforts, and are unrelated to the game-changing Saudi-Iran agreement struck in Beijing on 10 March. The sources believe that a meeting between Riyadh and Damascus may occur after the end of the month of Ramadan.

While the success of Saudi-Iran negotiations under Chinese auspices, and the potential breakthrough in Saudi-Syria relations under Russian sponsorship, suggest a strategic eastward turn for the kingdom, sources close to Riyadh emphasize that there is no change in the Saudi-US relationship.

While Riyadh’s relations with Washington have experienced declines in the past, recent shifts in the global political, economic, and military landscapes have prompted MbS to diversify his country’s partnerships, while preserving the strategic alignment with Washington.

Yemen: Riyadh’s regional albatross

Today, the Saudi crown price is pursuing a “zero problems” policy with neighboring countries. After failing to “transfer the [regional] battle into Iran,” and after his war on Yemen transformed Yemeni Resistance movement Ansarallah from a small organization into a regional force, MbS has realized that his domestic economic, financial, and entertainment mega-projects are doomed without ensuring calm on the kingdom’s borders.

Therefore, since late 2022, he began earnest negotiations with Iran, responded assertively to Russian efforts to mediate with Syria, and began direct talks with Ansarallah in their Sanaa stronghold. The discussions reportedly made significant progress, then stalled in January over several key points, including Riyadh’s “inability” (or unwillingness) to lift the siege on Yemen, the withdrawal of foreign forces from the country, and agreement over an internal political solution to the Yemeni crisis.

As things stand, Riyadh claims that it “cannot force its partners” in the aggression – the UAE and US, in particular – to withdraw their forces from Yemeni territory.

Several Ansarallah allies have assessed that the Saudis want to end the war, but have been prevented from doing so by the US, UK, UAE, and France. However, this estimate changed after Saudi Arabia retracted a number of the pledges it made in the negotiations.

After initially ceasing restrictions on the port of Hodeidah, the UN has returned to obstructing the arrival of some ships to the port. The siege renewal coincided with a visit by US Ambassador to Yemen Stephen Fagin to the UN Verification and Inspection Mechanism (UNVIM) personnel in Djibouti which is tasked with inspecting ships bound for Hodeidah.

In a renewed escalation of tensions, Ansarallah threatened to expel the UN mission in Sanaa within 72 hours if a container ship seized by inspectors in Djibouti was not released. Indeed, before the deadline expired, the UN released the ship.

Although the threat coincided with the US ambassador’s provocative visit, and while it appears that the Americans were trying to undermine the Saudi-Ansarallah understandings, Yemeni sources tell The Cradle that the obstruction of the ships was not exclusively a US decision, but also a Saudi one.

Furthermore, the UN explicitly informed the Sanaa government that the detention of ships proven to be weapons-free was carried out by a decision of the “coalition leadership” – that is, from the Saudis.

So what is Riyadh up to, and who is really obstructing a final solution to the war in Yemen? Is it the Saudis or the Americans?

Sources close to the Sanaa government say that “a comprehensive US-Saudi consensus” still exists over Yemen. The two allies may differ sometimes, but until now, they say:

“Washington and Riyadh still agree on calming things down in Yemen, while keeping the blockade in place. They also agree that Yemen should not be an independent and strong country, capable of controlling its resources or exploiting its geographical location, because that entails strategic risks for Saudi Arabia’s regional role, and for US and Israeli interests in West Asia, the Horn of Africa, and the Red Sea.”

The sources add: “Saudi Arabia and America cannot afford to grant Ansarallah conditions that would enable it to accumulate additional strength and a larger and more effective arsenal.” Simply put, the duo are not seeking an actual end to the war, but are instead pursuing a drawn-out truce.

MbS wants some calm to ensure that missiles and drones do not rain down on his ambitious entertainment and development projects, while the US and the UAE want to keep Yemen fragmented, persist in the theft of its vital oil resource, and at the same time, hold Ansarallah (in northern Yemen) responsible for managing a country that continues to buckle under siege.

Truces, not peace – yet

In short, from Yemen in the south, to Iran in the east, and Syria, Iraq and Turkey in the north, West Asia has entered the post-Arab Spring phase, where once-battling neighbors are seeking to reconnect.

This is a phase governed by ‘armistice agreements’ between countries that have fought each other, directly or via proxies, for more than a decade. Armistice agreements, it should be noted, are not peace treaties, and what this suggests is the continuation of the US-style legacy of “managing conflict,” and never actually ending it.

As multipolarism beckons the world around, it is yet to be seen if Chinese and Russian efforts to stabilize the region in order to advance sweeping connectivity, economic, and development projects will be able to overcome the old “conflict management” and “forever wars” paradigm of the declining unipolar order.

The views expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect those of The Cradle.

See Also

للتاريخ مساره وتوقيته

الاحد 2 نيسان 2022

بثينة شعبان 

إنّ التاريخ يأخذ وقته في حياكة الأحداث إلى أن تكتمل شروط التحوّل الكبير، والذي سوف يشهده ويعاصره ويعيشه العالم لحقب، وربما لقرون.

في تناول الأحداث الصغيرة منها والكبيرة، وتحليل أسبابها واستشراف نتائجها، يُثبت الإنسان في كلّ مرّة أنّه “خُلِقَ عجولا”، وأنّه رغم هذا التاريخ الطويل نسبياً للبشرية، فهو ما زال قليل الصبر والحكمة في تفكّره واستقراءاته. وإذا بدأنا هنا من الحرب الإرهابية، التي شنّتها الدول الاستعمارية الغربية وأتباعها، على سوريا عام 2011، وقام أحدنا بالعمل المضني في استعراض تيّار الإعلام الغربي والعربي بخصوص هذه الحرب، نجد أنّ التحليلات والاستقراءات التي نُشرت بصددها، والتي ساهمت في تضليل الكثيرين تفتقر إلى الاستفادة من التاريخ، كما تفتقر إلى نعمتي الحكمة والصبر. وإذا تناولنا الحرب على اليمن بعُجالة، نجد أنّ معظم ما قيل ونُشر عن الحرب على اليمن لا علاقة له بتاريخ اليمن، ولا بصفات الشعب اليمني الأصيلة والمثبتة، ولا بالحقائق الوجودية اليوم التي يعيشها هذا الشعب، بل تنطلق بمعظمها من استهداف عزيمة وثقة هذا الشعب بنفسه، ومحاولة إلحاق الهزيمة النفسية به من خلال التهويل الإعلامي الذي هو في الحقيقة أداة من أدوات هذه الحرب على هذا الشعب الشجاع والصابر والمؤمن بالله والوطن. 

بعد سنة فقط من بدء هذه العملية في أوكرانيا، يجتمع الرئيسان الروسي والصيني ليناقشا مجالات التعاون

ولكنّ المثال الأكبر، والذي أودّ أن أتوقّف عنده وأقلّبه من كلّ زواياه وجوانبه، وذلك للأثر الشديد له على مصيرنا جميعاً، ومصير البشرية للعقود القادمة، هو العملية العسكرية الروسية في أوكرانيا، والتي رغم انطلاقها من نقطة نزاع بين روسيا والغرب إلا أنّ ارتداداتها ونتائجها ذات أثر بالغ على مستقبل وشؤون الدول، وعلى مستقبل العلاقات الدولية، وعلى مستقبل الإنسان في كلّ مكان، ولن تستكمل هذه الارتدادات دورتها ونتائجها إلا بعد عقود من الآن، وسيعيش أبناؤنا وربما أحفادنا التغيرات التي أطلقتها شرارة هذه الحرب فقط لإطلاق مسار تشعّب بعد ذلك وتطوّر في الميادين المختلفة وتطوّرت أهدافه وأصبح مثل كرة الثلج لا يمكن إيقافه بمكان ولا تحديده بموضوع أو مجال معين.

بعد سنة فقط من بدء هذه العملية في أوكرانيا، يجتمع الرئيسان الروسي والصيني ليناقشا مجالات التعاون بين بلديهما في الطاقة والصناعة وتبادل السلع بالعملات المحلية، والاستثمار في مجالات لم تخطر لهم على بال قبل عام فقط، دون أن يركّزوا على العملية العسكرية الروسية في أوكرانيا، والتي ربما تشكّل اليوم هامشاً صغيراً في إطار هذه العلاقات. وبعد عام من هذه العملية توقّع الهند مع الاتحاد الروسي اتفاقاً هاماً لتصدير الطاقة من روسيا إلى الهند بأسعار تفضيلية، (الأمر ذاته تمّ توقيعه مع الصين وبالعملة المحلية؛ أي استبعاد متزايد للدولار)، الأمر الذي سينجم عنه نهوضاً ملحوظاً في السنوات القادمة للصناعة الهندية والصينية، وتعزيز قدرتهما على منافسة المنتجات الأوروبية والأميركية. 

وبعد عام من هذه العملية قامت الصين وروسيا وإيران بإجراء مناورات عسكرية بحرية مشتركة لضمان سلامة وأمن الممرات المائية، الأمر الذي لم يكن يخطر لأحد على بال قبل بدء العملية العسكرية الروسية في أوكرانيا. وبعد عام من هذه العملية قامت الصين برعاية أهمّ اتفاق في هذا القرن، وبالتأكيد أهمّ اتفاق لمصير منطقة غرب أسيا والوطن العربي، وهو الاتفاق الإيراني السعودي، والذي كان مجرّد الحديث عنه قبل عامين يُعتبر ضرباً من الخيال. وبعد عام من العملية أصبحت إيران عضواً في منظمة شنغهاي، وقد قدّمت السعودية مؤخراً طلباً للانتساب إلى منظمة شنغهاي، مما يجعل هذه المنظمة أهمّ منظمة لمنتجي الطاقة: روسيا وإيران والسعودية، وسوف يكون لها رأي هام في أسعار وتوريد الطاقة عالمياً، وتتعامل دول هذه المنظمة بالعملات المحلية، مرسلةً دولار الهيمنة الأميركية إلى حتفه.

وبعد عام من هذه العملية بقي الاقتصاد الروسي منتعشاً، بل ازداد تصديره للنفط والغاز لأنه سارع إلى إيجاد أسواق بديلة عن السوق الأوروبية، وازداد الدخل الروسي من تصدير النفط والغاز عمّا كان عليه قبل العملية العسكرية في أوكرانيا، رغم كلّ العقوبات التي يُمنّي الغرب نفسه بالحديث عنها، وتضخيم آثارها المأمولة بالنسبة لهم، بينما هي فاقدة الأثر والأهمية، بل أكثر من ذلك، لقد دفعت هذه العقوبات الظالمة على الشعوب والدول تجمع دول آسيان لاتخاذ قرارات جريئة بتبادل السلع بعملاتهم المحلية كي لا يتمكّن الغرب من التلاعب بأقدارهم حين يحلو له وللأسباب التي يرتأيها. أي إنّ هذه العقوبات قد ارتدّت على الذين أصدروها بأنها أفقدت ثقة العالم بهم وبعملتهم وبنظام المدفوعات الـ “سويفت”، ودفعت الدول للتفكير ببدائل متحرّرة تماماً من التأثير الغربي. الأمر الذي ينعكس حكماً على مكانة الدولار الأسطورية، كعملة دولية، والتي كانت سبباً أساسياً لهيمنة الغرب الاستعماري على العالم وسطوته على موارده ونجاح عقوباته. 

هذا في الشرق، أمّا في الغرب، فقد أرغمت الولايات المتحدة الدول الأوروبية على بتر علاقاتها مع روسيا، رغم أنّ هذه العلاقة كانت تصبّ في صالح الدول الأوروبية من خلال توفير الطاقة الرخيصة لاستخداماتها ولزراعتها ولصناعاتها. وماذا كان البديل؟ كان البديل هو أن تبيع الولايات المتحدة هذه الطاقة للدول الأوروبية بأربعة أضعاف السعر الذي كانت تكلفه هذه الطاقة من روسيا، الأمر الذي سينعكس إفقاراً لهذه الدول الأوروبية، وتخلّفاً في صناعتها وزراعتها، وعجزاً عن منافسة المنتجات الصينية والهندية والإندونيسية والبرازيلية في المستقبل القريب، الأمر الذي سيكفل خروج أوروبا من لائحة الدول المتقدّمة صناعياً، والمنافسة اقتصادياً لدول الشرق التي تمارس الحكمة والصبر في علاقاتها أولاً، وببناء عالم جديد من الإنتاج والعلاقات يزيح بحكم وجوده وقدرته على المنافسة العالم الغربي الذي تصرّف بصلف واستكبار، فوقع في شرّ ما قدّمت يداه. 

هذا على الصعيد الاقتصادي والإنتاجي والمالي، أمّا على الصعيد الأخلاقي والإنساني، فقد سقط الغرب سقوطاً مدوّياً في براثن الليبرالية الحديثة سيئة الصيت، وأخذت الإنسانية تعمل على حماية نفسها من تأثيرات الغرب القميئة على مستقبل أجيالها. ولكلّ هذا أقول لمن ما زال يؤمن بقوّة الغرب وحكمته، وأنه لا يُقهر وأنه الأنموذج والمثل، إنّ التاريخ يتشكّل ليبرهن عكس ذلك تماماً، ولكنّ التاريخ ليس عجولاً، بل يأخذ وقته في حياكة الأحداث إلى أن تكتمل شروط التحوّل الكبير، والذي سوف يشهده ويعاصره ويعيشه العالم لحقب، وربما لقرون بعد الإيذان بهذا التحوّل من خلال شرارة أطلقت في مكان ما ثمّ أخذت الأحداث مسارها ومجالاتها وتوقيتها بغضّ النظر عن مصير تلك الشرارة، وبشكل أكبر وأهمّ وأدهى مما يتخيّله كثيرون. 

إن الآراء المذكورة في هذه المقالة لا تعبّر بالضرورة عن رأي الميادين وإنما تعبّر عن رأي صاحبها حصراً

فيديوات ذات صلة

مقالات ذات صلة