Sayyed Nasrallah to Lebanese Forces: Don’t Miscalculate, Hezbollah Has 100,000 Fighters

October 19, 2021

Sayyed Nasrallah
Hezbollah S.G. Sayyed Hasan Nasrallah during a televised speech via Al-Manar (Monday, October 18, 2021).

Marwa Haidar

Hezbollah Secretary General Sayyed Hasan Nasrallah on Monday lashed out at the Lebanese Forces militia, advising its chief to abandon attempts to ignite a civil war in Lebanon.

In a speech that basically tackled the latest massacre by the notorious militia in Tayouneh last Thursday, Sayyed Nasrallah warned the head of Lebanese Forces party (LF), even without mentioning his name, against any miscalculation regarding the civil war in Lebanon.

Sayyed Nasrallah in this context, revealed the number of Hezbollah fighters who are ready to defend their country.

“Don’t miscalculate and behave,” Sayyed Nasrallah addressed LF, adding: “Hezbollah has 100,000 fighters who are fully ready to act in case we just point to them to do so.”

The Hezbollah S.G. said the Lebanese security apparatus confirmed that LF militants and snipers were responsible for Tayouneh massacre which killed seven Lebanese civilians during a protest against the politicization of an investigation into Beirut Port.

Sayyed Nasrallah said that the LF has been for long time instigating the Christians in the country, especially residents of Ain Al-Rimaneh and Al-Hadat, against Hezbollah through creating fake enemy of residents in Dahiyeh.

His eminence stressed that Hezbollah, Amal Movement, the entire Shiite sect and Muslims don’t pose a threat to the Christians in Lebanon, but rather the LF poses an existential threat to them.

Sayyed Nasrallah called on state institutions to hold a serious probe into the massacre in Tayouneh, stressing importance of staging another investigation by the Lebanese Army in order to look into the videos circulated by social media showing Lebanese soldier firing at a peaceful protester during October 14 massacre.

On the issue of Beirut Port blast investigation, his eminence stressed that Hezbollah has been keen to reveal the truth in this issue, slamming judges who gave permission to the ship carrying ammonium nitrate to enter Beirut Port several years ago.

Meanwhile, Sayyed Nasrallah praised families of the martyrs who fell in Tayouneh massacre, hailing their patience and wisdom. In this context, his eminence vowed that Hezbollah won’t abandon the martyrs and will go ahead with legal course in a bid to hold the perpetrators accountable.

Lebanese Forces Trying to Ignite Civil War

Sayyed Nasrallah started his speech by congratulating Muslims on the birthday anniversary of Prophet Mohammad (PBUH), announcing that despite pain and grief, Hezbollah will hold a ceremony to mark the occasion next Friday in Dahiyeh.

His eminence praised celebrations held by the Yemeni people on the occasion, as well as stances announced by Ansarullah leader Sayyed Abdul Malek Al-Houthi.

Sayyed Nasrallah, meanwhile, offered condolences over martyrdom of a number of Afghan people in a terrorist attack staged by ISIL terrorists on a mosque in the city of Kandahar.

He also offered condolences over martyrdom of freed prisoner Medhat Saleh, who was killed by Israeli occupation forces few days ago.

The Hezbollah S.G. then get into the main issue of his speech, the massacre committed by Lebanese Forces militants in Tayouneh last Thursday.

Sayyed Nasrallah said that the LF has been instigating against Hezbollah for long time, trying to create a fake enemy to the Christians in Lebanon.

“The Lebanese Forces party wanted to make our people in Ain Al-Rimaneh, Forn Al-Chebbak and Al-Hadat feel concerned and afraid of people of other regions especially in Dahiyeh.”

“This party and its leader (Samir Geagea) aim at presenting themselves as defenders of Christians in Lebanon in order to serve their goals related to political leadership,” he said, noting that the LF leader has been convicted by the Lebanese judiciary over war crimes.

“In the latest years, the Lebanese Forces, and with the support of regional and international powers, has been working to create an enemy to the Christians in Lebanon and to present himself as the defender of this community against this so-called enemy, which is Hezbollah,” Sayyed Nasrallah said, citing schemes to target Hezbollah by the US, ‘Israel’ and some Gulf states.

And to confirm that Hezbollah is being targeted by the LF along with regional and international powers, Sayyed Nasrallah said that the Lebanese Forces chief focused in his remarks following the massacre in Tayouneh on Hezbollah, despite that fact that three of the seven martyrs are supporters of Amal Movement.

“The real program of the LF is to the civil war, for this scheme leads to the displacement of the Christians and then creating a Christian canton which LF chief aims to rule.”

Sayyed Nasrallah noted that the massacre in Tayouneh opens a new chapter of Hezbollah’s way to deal with the local issue.

He said that both Hezbollah and Amal Movement were reassured by the Lebanese Army a night before the massacre over the security situation in the region of the protest near Justice Palace, where the shooting took place.

Commenting on LF leader’s remarks that the Tayouneh massacre was a “mini May 7 events” Sayyed Nasrallah said that such remarks is a clear claim of responsibility of the shooting.

Hezbollah Defended Christians, LF Existential Threat

Sayyed Nasrallah then elaborated on the idea that Hezbollah is not an enemy to the Christians in Lebanon and Syria. He stressed that Hezbollah’s behavior with Christian in Lebanon and Syria throughout years confirm that the Lebanese Resistance party look at the Christians in the country as political partners and not enemies.

“For those who say that Hezbollah is the enemy of Christians, you can ask the churches which Hezbollah defended in Syria against Takfiri terrorists.”

“When Hezbollah defended its people of the Christians in Syria and the Lebanese border towns against ISIL and Nusra terrorists, the Lebanese Forces party was offering all forms of support to the Takfiris.”

He addressed the Christians in Lebanon by saying: “All those who tell you that Shia and Muslims are an enemy they are fabricating such accusations. The greatest existential threat for you is the Lebanese Forces since this party had allied with the terrorists in Syria.”

Sayyed Nasrallah then pointed to Hezbollah’s behavior towards Christians following the Israeli withdrawal from Lebanon in 2000.

“Hezbollah prevented any of its fighters or fighters belonging to Amal Movement from entering the Christian towns in south Lebanon upon the Liberation in 2000. We even did not harm collaborators with Israeli enemy in that towns, rather we handed them over to the Lebanese Army. This was in a bid to avoid any Muslim-Christian sedition.”

Sayyed Nasrallah then said that Hezbollah, throughout years adopted a policy of openness with political parties, including the Christian powers.

“In February 6, 2006 we held a MoU with the largest Christian party, which is the Free Patriotic Movement (FPM),” Sayyed Nasralah said, noting that the LF was the first side who stand against the MoU between Hezbollah and the FPM.

S. Nasrallah Advises LF Not to Miscalculate

Sayyed Nasrallah then advised the LF and its leader to abandon the idea of suing discord in a bid to ignite a civil war in Lebanon.

“If you want to prepare for a civil war then have not to miscalculate. Take a note that Hezbollah is made up of at least 100,00 well-trained and experienced fighters whom can act in case Hezbollah’s leadership points to do so,” Sayyed Nasrallah addressed the LF and its chief.

In this context, Sayyed Nasrallah stressed that the Resistance is not weak, but rather is keen to preserve security and avoid sedition.

“Hence, I say to LF and its leader: Don’t miscalculate, behave and take lesson from the wars you had been engaged in.”

Sayyed Nasrallah said that the Lebanese state institution along with religious figures, especially the Christians, “must bear responsibility and stand against this criminal butcher in a bid to avoid civil war and preserve national peace.”

He then stressed importance of launching a serious investigation into the massacre in Tayouneh, noting that the Lebanese Army must also do so regarding a video circulated on social media and shows a Lebanese soldier firing at a peaceful protester during Tayouneh shooting.

In this context, Sayyed Nasrallah warned against any dispute between Hezbollah and the Lebanese Army, stressing that the national army is part of the golden formula aimed at defending Lebanon: Army-People-Resistance.

Beirut Port Blast Probe

On the issue of Beirut Port blast probe, Sayyed Nasrallah affirmed that Hezbollah is keen to know the truth behind the tragedy which killed more than 200 Lebanese people and injured thousands on August 4, 2020.

“We won’t take back on this case. It’s a political responsibility to know those who were responsible for this tragedy.”

Several sides contacted Hezbollah and reassured the party that it would not be accused, Sayyed Nasrallah said, noting that those sides also acknowledged that the probe is discretionary.

“The way the probe is going on won’t lead to reveal truth. The judges who gave permission to the ship carrying the ammonium nitrate to enter Beirut Port bears responsibility of the tragedy in the port.”

Meanwhile, Sayyed Nasrallah hailed patience and wisdom of Tayouneh massacre’s martyrs, vowing that the blood of those martyrs won’t go in vain.

His eminence also equated Tayouneh martyrs to those of the Resistance who were martyred in defending Lebanon.

“We have to preserve goals achieved by the Resistance and its martyrs, on top of which are security and national peace,” Sayyed Nasrallah addressed martyrs’ families as saying.

Addressing the Resistance supporters, Sayyed Nasrallah stressed that this stage prompts more patience and insight in a bid to avoid any form of infighting in the country. In this context, his eminence noted that igniting a civil war is the “last card played by our enemies.”

Source: Al-Manar English Website

Related Videos

Related Articles

The Americans Retreat: We Failed to Harm Hezbollah الأميركيون «يتراجعون»: فشِلنا في الإضرار بحزب الله

September 04, 2021

The Americans Retreat: We Failed to Harm Hezbollah

By Hiam al-Qusaify – Al-Akhbar Newspaper

Translated by staff

Following a period of radical American posturing, some signs of change are beginning to appear from Washington as the situation deteriorates and these policies take their toll on Lebanon. Recent American messages seem to be pushing for quick government formation and a move towards elections.

According to reliable American sources, a serious discussion has begun about the feasibility of the pressure exerted by Washington on Hezbollah, its allies, and its sources of funding since 2017 as well as the impact of this pressure on the group and Lebanon as a whole. The discussions concluded that while the financial and economic sanctions affected Hezbollah, the effects weren’t at the level that the Americans had hoped or expected. Rather, it was the other political forces and the Lebanese in general who have been the hardest hit by the unprecedented collapse at all levels.

A reevaluation of the American position is morphing into a new approach, the features of which appeared in the form of direct messages about the formation of a [Lebanese] government. The messages indicate that the Americans are pressing for the formation of a government as soon as possible, in order to avoid further collapse. This collapse is gradually becoming dangerous and severe, to the extent that the Lebanese situation may become a costly bargaining chip for the American side during negotiations with Iran. What Washington wants in Lebanon is for the situation not to collapse completely since it’s still “Israel’s” neighbor, with all that this means. It is also Syria’s neighbor, which Washington still views as an arena of tension. In addition, a complete collapse will only fuel fears in the region that terrorists will infiltrate to the outside world from Syria, in light of the current circumstances in Afghanistan.

According to the latest information, Washington is showing noticeable resentment and despair over the inability of its allies in Beirut to put pressure on Hezbollah and the Covenant [the Lebanese President]. But its allies remained reluctant to engage in an actual confrontation, regardless of their affiliations and positions [except for a very limited number of them], as if they wanted Washington to fight their battles for them.

But Washington isn’t in the process of initiating any such intervention. Instead, it’s opting for a different approach, which involves sending messages of pressure to form the government without any conditions. Washington is no longer concerned with any provisions related to the representation of Hezbollah and its allies, and it’s certainly not concerned with the dispute over the quotas for the representation of Christians or the one-third guarantor. It is concerned about the formation of a government and then holding elections.

Perhaps the second point has become more important for the U.S. because the expected government is a turning point to prevent the collapse. The elections mean more time (because the region’s negotiation stages are long) and the prospects of a new government emerging will help more in the rescue process. From here, the pressure will go towards accepting a government that does not resemble the government of Premiere Hassan Diab. It may not mind a government in which the President has a blocking third, even if it does not publicly give its blessing.

In addition, Washington tried to pressure the Lebanese President to distance himself from Hezbollah to the point of turning against it. But this did not happen, and for various reasons, some of which are about principles and others practical. It’s worth mentioning that at some stages there was noticeable tension in the relationship between the Free Patriotic Movement and Hezbollah – when there was a lot of talk about restoring the relationship and updating the understanding paper, until the issue was finally withdrawn from deliberations by both parties. Note that President Michel Aoun did not go to extremes in this matter.

Hence, Washington’s new roadmap is directed more towards encouraging everyone, including the President of the Republic and the Prime Minister-designate, to expedite the formation of the government at a time when there was fear that Hezbollah and Aoun would seek to take advantage of the new American atmosphere and be strict in forming a government closer to the same color. But judging by Hezbollah’s actions, this seems unlikely as long as the party is represented by someone close to it.

In parallel, there are assurances that all this has nothing to do with any Gulf or Saudi position. Saudi Arabia, unlike Washington, maintains a completely negative posture towards Lebanon and is not concerned with any new American position that helps buy time by forming a government and holding elections. Riyadh withdrew from Lebanon and won’t have any role in the near future.

Finally, the paradox lies in the different approaches of Hezbollah and Aoun to what happened in recent months. Aoun burned bridges with all the allied political forces, the opposition, and the Christian forces, and he is likely to invest these in what will happen next to confront them, as he usually does. As for Hezbollah, it did the exact opposite and tried to understand the reactions of others. It did not turn against any party, first of which is the Sunni group, including previous heads of government and individuals, and other political forces. Rather, it was in favor of the entry of the Lebanese Forces into the government in its pursuit of solving the problem of government representation. Therefore, the question remains: How will they act today regarding the repercussions of forming a government, after the emergence of the new American vision in Lebanon?

الأميركيون «يتراجعون»: فشِلنا في الإضرار بحزب الله

أعضاء من لجنة الشؤون الخارجية في مجلس الشيوخ الأميركي قبيل مغادرتهم مطار بيروت أمس (دالاتي ونهرا)
See the source image

الخميس 2 أيلول 2021

هيام القصيفي

بعد تدهور الأوضاع وانعكاس هذا التشدد على حال البلاد. الرسائل الأميركية الأخيرة ضاغطة لجهة أن الوقت قد حان لتأليف حكومة سريعاً والانتقال إلى مرحلة التحضير للانتخاباتفي معلومات مصادر أميركية موثوقة أن نقاشاً جدياً بدأ يأخذ طابعاً متقدماً حول جدوى الضغوط التي مارستها واشنطن منذ عام 2017 على حزب الله وحلفائه ومصادر تمويله وانعكاسها عليه وعلى لبنان ككل. خلاصة النقاش أن الضغوط التي جرت منذ ما قبل العقوبات على بنك «جمّال» والعقوبات والتطويق المالي والاقتصادي، أظهرت حتى الآن أن حزب الله تأثر بطبيعة الحال، بكل ما سبق ذكره، لكن الإصابات لم تكن على المستوى الذي كان يتوقعه الأميركيون. لا بل إن القوى السياسية الأخرى واللبنانيين عموماً هم الذين تأثروا وأصيبوا إصابات فادحة ومباشرة في ظل انهيار غير مسبوق على كافة المستويات الحياتية.

إعادة قراءة الموقف الأميركي، بدأت تأخذ شكلاً مغايراً ظهرت معالمه في رسائل مباشرة حول تشكيل الحكومة. تفيد الرسائل بأن الأميركيين يضغطون لتأليف الحكومة في أسرع وقت ممكن، تفادياً لمزيد من الانهيار. هذا الانهيار يتحول، تدريجاً، خطِراً وقاسياً، إلى الحد الذي قد يصبح فيه الوضع اللبناني ورقة مكلفة في الحوار التفاوضي مع إيران وتضطر معه واشنطن إلى دفع أثمان باهظة في لبنان. وما يعني واشنطن من لبنان عدم ذهاب الوضع إلى الانهيار التام، فهو لا يزال بالنسبة إليها «جار إسرائيل»، مع كل ما يعني ذلك، وهو جار سوريا التي لا تزال تنظر واشنطن إليها كساحة توتر قائمة، إضافة إلى أن أي انهيار تام يعيد في ظل الظروف الحالية من أفغانستان إلى المنطقة، حالة خوف من تسرب إرهابيين عبره إلى الخارج.

واشنطن تبدي استياء ملحوظاً ويأساً من حلفائها في بيروت، لعدم قيامهم بما يواكب ضغوطها على حزب الله وعون


وبحسب المعلومات فإن واشنطن تبدي استياء ملحوظاً ويأساً من حلفائها في بيروت، لعدم قيامهم بما يتقاطع مع ما فعلته منذ سنوات طويلة للضغط على حزب الله والعهد. لكن حلفاءها ظلوا متقاعسين عن المواجهة الفعلية، على كافة انتماءاتهم ومواقعهم، (ما عدا قلة محدودة جداً منهم)، وكأنهم يريدون أن تقوم واشنطن بمعاركهم بدلاً عنهم. وواشنطن «ليست في وارد أي تدخل من هذا النوع». لذا كان الانتقال إلى مقاربة مختلفة، وهي توجيه رسائل ضغط لتشكيل الحكومة من دون أي شروط. فواشنطن لم تعد معنية بأي بنود تتعلق بتمثيل حزب الله وحلفائه، ولا قطعاً بالخلاف حول حصص تمثيل المسيحيين أو الثلث الضامن. ما يعنيها تشكيل الحكومة، ومن ثم إجراء الانتخابات. ولعل النقطة الثانية بالنسبة إليها أصبحت أكثر أهمية، لأن الحكومة المتوقعة هي المعبر لوقف الانهيار، والانتخابات تعني مزيداً من كسب الوقت (لأن مراحل مفاوضات المنطقة طويلة) واحتمال إعادة إنتاج سلطة وحكومة جديدة منبثقة منها تساعد أكثر في عملية الإنقاذ. من هنا سيذهب الضغط نحو القبول بحكومة لا تشبه حكومة الرئيس حسان دياب، وقد لا تمانع بحكومة فيها ثلث معطل لرئيس الجمهورية، ولو لم تباركها علناً.

النقطة الثانية هي أن واشنطن بحسب المعلومات حاولت الضغط على رئيس الجمهورية لدفعه نحو الابتعاد عن حزب الله، إلى حد الانقلاب عليه، لكن هذا الأمر لم يحصل، ولأسباب متنوعة بعضها مبدئي وبعضها عملي. علماً أنه كان لافتاً في بعض المراحل وجود توتر في العلاقة بين التيار الوطني الحر كحزب وقيادة وحزب الله، حين كثر الحديث عن ترميم العلاقة وتحديث ورقة التفاهم، إلى أن سُحب الموضوع نهائياً من التداول من جانب الطرفين. علماً أن عون لم يذهب في هذا الموضوع إلى الحد الأقصى.

فشلت الضغوط الأميركية على رئيس الجمهورية بدفعه نحو الابتعاد عن حزب الله، إلى حد الانقلاب عليه


من هنا فإن خريطة عمل واشنطن الجديدة تتجه أكثر نحو تشجيع الجميع بمن فيهم رئيس الجمهورية والرئيس المكلف على الإسراع في تشكيل الحكومة. في وقت كان ثمة تخوف من أن يسعى حزب الله وعون إلى الاستفادة من الجو الأميركي المستجد، فيتشددان في تشكيل حكومة أقرب إلى اللون الواحد، لكن هذا الأمر يبدو مستبعداً كما يظهر من أداء حزب الله، ما دام تمثيل الأحزاب بشخصيات قريبة لم يعد محرماً ولا الثلث المعطل الضمني.

في موازاة ذلك ثمة تأكيدات أن كل هذه الإحاطة لا علاقة لها بأي موقف خليجي ولا سعودي. السعودية وبخلاف واشنطن، لا تزال على موقفها السلبي تماماً تجاه لبنان، ولا يعنيها أي موقف أميركي مستجد يساعد على كسب الوقت من خلال تشكيل حكومة وإجراء الانتخابات. الرياض ستظل معتكفة عن لبنان، وعن أي دور لها في المستقبل القريب.
يبقى أخيراً أن المفارقة تكمن في اختلاف مقاربة حزب الله وعون لما جرى في الأشهر الأخيرة. فعون كسر الجرة مع جميع القوى السياسية الحليفة والمعارضة والقوى المسيحية قاطبة، ومن المرجّح أن يستثمر في ما سيجري لاحقاً لمواجهتهم، كما هي عادته. أما حزب الله ففعل العكس تماماً، وحاول استيعاب ردود الفعل، ولم ينقلب على أي طرف وأولهم الفريق السني بكل ما يمثله رؤساء الحكومات السابقين مجتمعين أو فرادى، ولا مع القوى السياسية الأخرى، لا بل كان مؤيداً لدخول القوات اللبنانية إلى الحكومة في إطار السعي لحل مشكلة التمثيل الحكومي. لذا سيكون السؤال كيف سيتصرفان اليوم، كل من موقعه، إزاء انعكاسات تشكيل حكومة، بعد ظهور «الرؤية الأميركية» الجديدة للواقع في لبنان.

حملة إعلاميّة على كلام السيد… من دون خطاب إعلاميّ

ناصر قنديل

خلال سنتين يمكن إحصاء انخراط عشرات المنابر الإعلاميّة القديمة والجديدة والمستجدة في حملات مبرمجة تستهدف موقف حزب الله وتسعى إلى شيطنته، ربطاً بكلام قاله سابقاً وزير الخارجية الأميركية السابق مايك بومبيو، عن تحميل حزب الله مسؤولية كل أزمات لبنان، وإقفال الطريق على كل الحلول، وكلما كان للحزب موقف لافت تجاه الشأن الداخليّ خصوصاً على لسان أمينه العام السيد حسن نصرالله، تنطلق موجة من الصخب الإعلامي والسياسي، تحت عناوين تصل حد المبالغة في تضخيم أو تحجيم الوقائع التي ترد في الخطاب، للوصول الى نظرية محورها، أن حزب الله يرهن مستقبل لبنان وأوضاعه خدمة لعلاقته بإيران ومصالحها، ودائماً من دون تقديم أي دليل مقارن علمياً، بين حجم التدخل الأميركي وحجم التدخل الإيراني، طالما أن القضية تدور على توظيف النفوذ في لبنان ضمن مفاوضات طرفها الأول طهران وطرفها الآخر هو واشنطن، من دون أن ينتبه الذين يقولون إن طهران هي المشكلة وإن واشنطن هي الحل، فهم بذلك أول من يربط مستقبل لبنان يهذا التفاوض، ويجعل لبنان ورقة قوة لأحد الفريقين.

يترافق ذلك مع استنتاجات من نوع، التحذير من خطورة الحملة الإعلامية وقوتها واتساع مداها، بالاستناد إلى حجم المجندين فيها من سياسيين وإعلاميين ومنابر، لتأتي محطة حدث لاحق لتقول إن موازين القوى الإعلامية والسياسية لم تتغير، وإن حملة جديدة تنطلق، فيظهر ان حلفاء حزب الله لا زالوا حلفاءه، وأن بيئة حزب الله الشعبية لا تزال بيئته المتماسكة، وهنا تبدو دعوات جلد الذات التي يقوم بها بعض المؤيدين للحزب والمقاومة، تحت عنوان اختلال التوازن الإعلامي بين المقاومة وخصومها، في غير مكانها، بل يصحّ الحديث عن فشل الحملات، خصوصاً عندما يكون معيار النجاح والفشل، هو في مدى القدرة على تغيير الاصطفافات سواء للتحالفات، أو للبيئة المحيطة بالمقاومة. وهذا ما تقول أحداث السنتين رغم كثافة الحملات، إن شيئاً فيها لن يتغيّر، وإن حدث تغيير فهو باتجاه شدّ عصب البيئة الحاضنة للمقاومة لتتمسّك أكثر بخياراتها، وهذا يعني نجاحاً في الإعلام المقاوم، الذي يشكل كلام السيد نصرالله صواريخه الدقيقة، التي لا تصمد أمامها لا جبهة داخلية ولا جليل ولا قبة حديدية لدى الخصوم، تماماً كما لا تصمد الإمكانات الهائلة لجيش الإحتلال أمام التحدّي الذي تمثله المقاومة بإمكانات متواضعة قياساً بما لدى كيان الاحتلال.

كما هو الفارق بين جيش الاحتلال والمقاومة هو في الروح، وهو الذي يرتب نتائج معاكسة لموازين الإمكانات، يبدو الفارق بين كلام السيد نصرالله والحملات المنظمة ضده، هو في أن كلام السيد يقدم خطاباً إعلاميّاً تفتقده الحملات التي تستهدف خطابه، ونبدأ بالخطاب الأخير، أعلن السيد قبوله والتزامه بتعهّده السابق لجهة تسهيل حكومة اختصاصيين معلناً تفضيله حكومة تكنوسياسيّة أو حكومة سياسيّة، فقامت حملة ترى في كلامه تخلياً عن المبادرة الفرنسيّة، وتراجعاً تمهيداً للتعطيل، ونسي أصحاب الحملة ان يصيغوا خطاباً يجيب عن حقيقة أن الحكومة التي نصّت عليها المبادرة الفرنسيّة قامت على حكومة من غير السياسيين رئيساً وأعضاء، وأن هذه المبادرة تحورت إلى تكنوسياسيّة عندما صار رئيسها سياسياً ومن الصف الأول، وكل دعوة السيد تقوم على مواءمة تركيبة الحكومة مع هوية رئيسها، من دون جعل ذلك شرطاً. فهل هذا تعطيل ام تسهيل، أن يقول السيد رغم ان الحكومة صارت تكنوسياسية بشخص رئيسها فنحن لا نمانع ببقاء أعضائها من غير السياسيين ولا نعتبر ذلك ضرباً للمبادرة الفرنسيّة وتخلياً عن حكومة الاختصاصيين ونقترح توازناً يتيح شراكة سياسية أوسع تحمي الحكومة، لا تنحصر برئيسها فقط، لكننا لا نضع ذلك شرطاً مساهمة في تسهيل الحكومة.

في الماضي قال السيد إن داعش موجودة في عرسال، فقامت القيامة كما اليوم، وخرج وزير الدفاع يومها فايز غصن يتحدّث عن تقارير أمنية يؤكد ذلك، فنالته سهام الاتهام، وطبعاً قالت الأحداث بعدها إن كل الحملات كانت متواطئة مع وجود داعش ضمن رهانات ضيقة الأفق. واليوم عندما يحذّر السيد من حرب أهلية ويخرج وزير الداخلية ويقول إن هناك تقارير تؤكد وجود مخططات إسرائيليّة لتعميم الفوضى وإشعال حرب أهلية، يتذاكى البعض فيتهم السيد بالسعي للحرب الأهليّة، وهو نفسه يتهم الحزب بالسيطرة على مفاصل القرار في البلد، والاتهامان لا يستقيمان، بحيث يفرط حزب ممسك بالبلد بإنجازه بالذهاب الى حرب أهلية، وبالتوازي يخرج اتهام الحزب بالسيطرة على الدولة، وفي الدولة جيش يقولون عنه إنه جزيرة خارج سيطرة الحزب يدعمونها، وأجهزة أمنية تتباهى السفارات الغربية برعايتها والتعاون معها، ومصرف لبنان الذي قيل عنه خط دولي أحمر، وهو الممسك بالوضعين المالي والنقدي، وكلها خارج سيطرة الحزب، وبجانبها قضاء يُفرج عن العملاء، فأين تقع جزيرة نفوذ حزب الله في الدولة؟

بعض الحملات ارتكز على اللغة التي خاطب من خلالها السيد نصرالله، المعنيين في حالتي الارتفاع غير المبرّر في سعر الصرف، وقطع الطرقات، وحاول البناء عليها استنتاجات من نوع التصرف بلغة الحاكم مرة وبلغة التهديد مرة، والتدقيق في كلام السيد نصرالله يوصل لنتيجتين، الأولى أنه في شأن قطع الطرقات شرح وأوضح أنها ليست جزءاً من أي عمل ديمقراطي وان مظلة الحماية التي جيب توفيرها لكل احتجاج لا تطالها، وأنها عمل تخريبي وتحضيري للحرب الأهلية وإثارة الفتن الطائفية، ليصل الى مطالبة القوى الأمنية والعسكرية بمعاملتها على هذا الأساس، ولم نسمع أحداً من الوزراء او المراجع الأمنية يقول إن قطع الطرقات تعبير ديمقراطي سلمي، ما يطرح سؤالاً عن كيفية التصرف مع هذا الخطر إذا لم تقم القوى الأمنيّة بواجبها، بغير التعبير عن الغضب، وإعلان الاستعداد لتحمل المسؤوليّة، لمنع شرارة فتنة وليس سعياً لفتنة، ومن يريد الفتنة يشجع استمرار الاحتقان الناتج عن قطع الطرقات بدلاً من أن يحذّر منه، ومن لا يريدها هو من يحذّر وبالتالي فإن تصرّفه سيكون محكوماً بتفادي الوقوع في الفتنة، ومثله موضوع سعر الصرف الذي جنّ جنون الناس بسببه، فهل يعتبر التحذير من خطورته تجاوزاً؟ وهل تحميل مصرف لبنان وحاكمه المسؤوليّة تجاوز للأصول، أم ترك الناس تقتحم المصرف والمصارف هو الالتزام بالأصول؟

هناك حملات وليست حملة، لكن ليس هناك خطاب إعلاميّ، ولذلك تتحول الحملات الى مجرد صخب وضجيج وصراخ، لكنها في النهاية زبد، والزبد يذهب جفاء وما ينفع الناس يمكث في الأرض.

مقالات متعلقة

Who was behind the assassination of Luqman and what were the objectives of the campaign to fabricate indictment against Hezbollah? من يقف وراء جريمة اغتيال لقمان وما أهداف حملة تلفيق الاتهام لحزب الله؟

**English Machine translation Please scroll down for the Arabic original version **

Who was behind the assassination of Luqman and what were the objectives of the campaign to fabricate indictment against Hezbollah?

Hassan Hardan

The assassination of activist Luqman Salim, which provoked many reactions, was noted that immediately after the crime, forces and groups of so-called civil society and elite figures launched a systematic campaign accusing Hizbullah of being behind the assassination, so that this accusation did not wait for any investigation from the security and judicial authorities, and issued a prejudgment, in the name of political prejudgment, which accused Hezbollah, Syria, forces and national figures, of being behind the assassination of President Rafik, minutes after the assassination

What does that demonstrate, and why immediately accuse Hezbollah, and choose this particular time?

What is required in the face of this suspicious accusation of its objectives?

First, the haste, as soon as the news of the assassination is announced, to indict Hezbollah, which makes any neutral observer draw major question marks and wonders about whether the crime was carried out by suspicious parties, because these parties realise and know in advance that the finger of blame will be directed at Hezbollah. Based on the fact that Luqman was assassinated in an area where Hezbollah enjoys great popular influence, and that Luqman is known for his fierce opposition to Hezbollah and its resistance against the occupation, which achieves these parties the goal that they seek, to undermine its role of the resisting patriot, and claim that it has transformed, according to her claim, from a party resisting the Zionist enemy, to an authority of “suppression, domination, exclusion and terror” of all those who criticise him, oppose his opinion and stand against his policy …

Secondly, the timing of the assassination seems to have been chosen in an attempt to extricate the “Injiz” forces and groups from their predicament, which have become in it, against the backdrop of the failure of their movements on the one hand, and enable them to make a breakthrough in the resistance environment by providing an atmosphere of sympathy with them that enables them to gain the support of the youth. Under the headings of rejecting the policy of “suppressing and terrorising the opponents”, after these forces and groups reached a dead end and failed to implement the American plan to bring about a political coup against power and exclude Hezbollah and its allies from it ..This failure has been evident recently through the inability of these forces and groups in their recent moves to revive popular protests by exploiting the worsening social and living suffering caused by the explosion of the economic and financial crisis, exacerbated and accelerated by the U.S. financial and economic blockade…

Thirdly, the position of suspects behind the crime is linked to the American-Zionist plot, but it is due to the efforts of these parties to achieve two things that clearly appeared behind the campaign against Hezbollah, and as long as the aim of this plan is:

The first is sedition and incitement against the resistance, which is part of the U.S. coup plan, and the poisonous campaign that followed the crime and aimed at resistance, in an open attempt to invest blood, points to the re-movement of the NGOs groups, funded by the United States and the West, as former U.S. official David Hill acknowledged in his testimony to Congress earlier last year.

The second is to try to penetrate the popular environment of the resistance, and to win supporters alongside the groups mentioned under the heading of accusing Hizbullah of exercising hegemony and suppressing freedom of opinion and expression. The popularity of these groups has been strengthened in preparation for the upcoming parliamentary elections with the aim of transforming the balance of parliamentary power in favor of the pro-American political team…

From the above, it can be emphasised that:

1. Anyone who hastened to accuse Hizbullah of being behind the assassination, directly or indirectly, is deliberately or unintentionally contributing to the American plan, which is behind the sanctions against pro-resistance figures,  the imposition of a financial and economic blockade on Lebanon and the increased suffering of the Lebanese with the aim of pitting them against Hezbollah and its resistance.

It is not a secret that Washington is seeking, through the groups loyal to it, and some American-funded media, to hold Hezbollah responsible for this suffering, to exclude it and its allies from sharing power, and to impose the formation of a pro-American government, to implement the goals of the United States in terms of isolating and disarming the resistance, protecting Lebanon and its wealth from Zionist aggression, and returning Lebanon to a time of “Lebanon strength is in its weakness”, subject to American control and hegemony … and realising the ambitions of the enemy’s entity in Lebanon’s wealth by imposing a demarcation of the sea and land borders with occupied Palestine that meets Zionist ambitions …

2. The history of Hizbullah and its national and Islamic resistance confirms that it cannot in any way be behind the assassination, or facilitate its occurrence, because it is contrary to its policy of giving priority to the eradication of sedition and cutting off the road to American Zionist projects and plans to ignite it, and in this context, Hezbollah has followed the policy of tolerance of agents after liberation. In this context, Hezbollah pursued a policy of tolerance with IOF agents after the liberation in 2000, despite the atrocities and crimes they committed during the period of the Zionist occupation of the south, Hezbollah prevented retaliation against agents, in order to protect national unity in the liberated areas, and cut off the path to sedition that the enemy sought to disturb And aborting the strategic and historical victory achieved by the resistance by defeating the Zionist occupation army .. And Hezbollah persisted, unrivaled, in the face of the fierce attacks and the fabricated accusations it was subjected to, and the attacks targeting its supporters, following the assassination of Prime Minister Rafik Hariri, in order to prevent sectarian strife. …

In 2000, despite the atrocities and crimes committed during occupation by the IOF and the so called “free southern army of the south, and the prevention of retaliation against them, in order to protect national unity in the liberated areas, and And cut off the path to the strife that the enemy sought in order to abort the strategic and historical victory achieved by the resistance by defeating the Zionist occupation army. .. Likewise, Hizbullah persisted, with unparalleled patience, in the face of the fierce attacks and fabricated accusations it was subjected to, and the attacks targeting its supporters, following a crime The assassination of Prime Minister Rafic Hariri, in order to prevent sectarian strife …

So would those who pursue such a policy to prevent sedition, and are keen on national unity and civil peace, could stand behind a crime that is well known to serve the enemies of the resistance, waiting to exploit any incident, small or large, to undermine the image and reputation of the noble resistance, which defeated the Zionist and terrorist enemies, raised the head of Lebanon aloft, protected security and stability, and enabled the state and its apparatus to regain its authority over the liberated areas …

3. The patriotic duty requires everyone who is keen to confront sedition and not fall into the trap of American incitement against the resisting Hezbollah .. to confront this plot, by linking the condemnation of the assassination of Lokman Salim, and the request of the security and judicial authorities to conduct the required investigations to uncover the circumstances of the crime and to know the perpetrators and the parties who Stand behind them … At the same time, to condemn and expose the objectives of the fabricated campaign organised by anti-Hezbollah political forces and “NGOs”, to restore some glare to its suspicious role, after its failure to realise Washington’s dreams of achieving a political coup d’état to surround, isolate and disarm Hezbollah, despite spending billions on supporting these groups and other political forces affiliated with .   

من يقف وراء جريمة اغتيال لقمان وما أهداف حملة تلفيق الاتهام لحزب الله؟

حسن حردان

شكل اغتيال الناشط لقمان سليم، مثاراً لردود فعل عديدة، حيث لوحظ أنه وفور حدوث الجريمة أقدمت قوى وبعض مجموعات ما يسمّى المجتمع المدني «الأنجيؤز» وشخصيات من النخبة، على شنّ حملة ممنهجة تتهم حزب الله بالوقوف وراء ارتكاب عملية الاغتيال، حتى أنّ هذا الاتهام لم ينتظر ايّ تحقيق من الجهات الأمنية والقضائية، فصدر الحكم المسبق، بما يذكر بالحكم السياسي المسبق الذي اتهم حزب الله وسورية وقوى وشخصيات وطنية، بالوقوف وراء تنفيذ جريمة اغتيال الرئيس رفيق الحريري، بعد دقائق معدودة على حدوثها…

على ماذا يدلل ذلك، ولماذا المسارعة فوراً إلى اتهام حزب الله، واختيار هذا التوقيت بالذات؟

وما هو المطلوب في مواجهة هذا الاتهام المشبوه بأهدافه وغاياته؟

أولاً، إنّ المسارعة فور إعلان نبأ الاغتيال، الى توجيه الاتهام إلى حزب الله، يجعل ايّ مراقب محايد يرسم علامات استفهام كبرى، ويتساءل بشأن ما إذا كانت الجريمة نفذت بتدبير من جهات مشبوهة، لإدراك هذه الجهات ومعرفتها المسبقة أنّ أصابع الاتهام ستوجه إلى حزب الله، انطلاقاً من انّ لقمان اغتيل في منطقة يحظى فيها حزب الله بنفوذ شعبي كبير، وانّ لقمان معروف في معارضته الشرسة لحزب الله ومقاومته ضدّ الاحتلال، الأمر الذي يحقق لهذه الجهات هدفها الذي تسعى إليه، وهو الصادق التهمة بحزب الله، والتحريض عليه، ومحاولة النيل من دوره الوطني المقاوم، والقول بأنه تحوّل، حسب زعمها، من حزب مقاوم للعدو الصهيوني، إلى سلطة «قمع وهيمنة وإقصاء وإرهاب» لكلّ من ينتقده ويعارض رأيه ويقف ضدّ سياسته…

ثانياً، انّ اختيار توقيت عملية الاغتيال يبدو انه تمّ في محاولة لإخراج قوى ومجموعات «الأنجيؤز» من مأزقها، التي باتت فيه، على خلفية فشل تحركاتها من ناحية، وتمكينها من إحداث اختراق في بيئة المقاومة عبر توفير أجواء من التعاطف معها تمكّنها من كسب تأييد الشباب تحت عناوين رفض سياسة «قمع وإرهاب المعارضين»، بعد أن وصلت هذه القوى والمجموعات إلى طريق مسدود، وأخفقت في تنفيذ الخطة الأميركية لإحداث الانقلاب السياسي على السلطة وإقصاء حزب الله وحلفائه عنها.. وظهر هذا الفشل بشكل واضح مؤخراً من خلال عجز هذه القوى والمجموعات في تحركاتها الأخيرة في إعادة إحياء الاحتجاجات الشعبية باستغلال تفاقم المعاناة الاجتماعية والمعيشية الناتجة عن انفجار الأزمة الاقتصادية والمالية، التي فاقمها وسرّع من انفجارها، الحصار المالي والاقتصادي الأميركي الغربي…

ثالثاً، انّ وقوف جهات مشبوهة وراء الجريمة مرتبطة بالمخطط الأميركي الصهيوني، إنما يعود إلى سعي هذه الجهات إلى تحقيق أمرين ظهرا بوضوح من وراء الحملة ضدّ حزب الله، وطالما هدف إليهما هذا المخطط، وهما:

الأمر الأول، إثارة الفتنة والتحريض ضدّ المقاومة، وهو أمر يندرج ضمن خطة الانقلاب الأميركية، وتؤشر إليه الحملة المسمومة التي أعقبت الجريمة وتستهدف المقاومة، في محاولة مكشوفة لاستثمار الدم، لإعادة الزخم لتحركات مجموعات «الأنجيؤز»، المموّلة أميركياً وغربياً، باعتراف المسؤول الأميركي السابق ديفيد هيل في شهادته أمام الكونغرس في وقت سابق من العام الماضي.

الأمر الثاني، العمل على محاولة إحداث اختراق في البيئة الشعبية للمقاومة، وكسب مناصرين إلى جانب المجموعات المذكورة تحت عنوان اتهام حزب الله بممارسة الهيمنة والقمع لحرية الرأي والتعبير. واستطراداً تعزيز شعبية هذه المجموعات تحضيراً للانتخابات النيابية المقبلة بهدف إحداث تحوّل في موازين القوى النيابية في البرلمان لمصلحة الفريق الموالي للسياسة الأميركية…

انطلاقاً مما تقدم يمكن التأكيد على ما يلي:

1

ـ إنّ أيّ جهة سارعت إلى توجيه الاتهام إلى حزب الله، بالوقوف وراء جريمة الاغتيال، بشكل مباشر، أو غير مباشر، إنما تسهم عن قصد، أو غير قصد، في خدمة المخطط الأميركي، الذي يقف وراء العقوبات على شخصات مؤيدة للمقاومة، وفرض الحصار المالي والاقتصادي على لبنان وزيادة معاناة اللبنانيين بهدف تأليبهم وتحريضهم ضدّ حزب الله ومقاومته..

فليس خافياً، انّ واشنطن تسعى، عبر القوى والجماعات الموالية لها وبعض وسائل الإعلام المموّلة أميركياً، تسعى إلى تحميل حزب الله المسؤولية عن هذه المعاناة، لإقصائه وحلفائه عن المشاركة السلطة، وفرض تشكيل حكومة أميركية الهوى، تنفيذ أهداف الولايات المتحدة لناحية عزل المقاومة ونزع سلاحها، الذي يحمي لبنان وثرواته من الاعتداءات والأطماع الصهيونية… ويقلق كيان العدو، واستطراداً إعادة لبنان إلى زمن «قوته في ضعفه»، وخاضعاً للسيطرة والهيمنة الأميركية… وتحقيق أطماع كيان العدو في ثروات لبنان من خلال فرض ترسيم للحدود البحرية والبرية مع فلسطين المحتلة يلبّي هذه الأطماع…

2

ـ انّ تاريخ حزب الله ومقاومته الوطنية والإسلامية، يؤكد أنه لا يمكن بأيّ حال من الأحوال أن يكون وراء ارتكاب عملية الاغتيال، أو تسهيل حصولها، لأنّ ذلك يتعارض مع سياسته التي تعطي الأولوية لوأد الفتنة وقطع الطريق على المشاريع والمخططات الأميركية الصهيونية لإشعالها، وفي هذا السياق فإنّ حزب الله اتبع سياسة التسامح مع العملاء بعد التحرير عام 2000، رغم الفظاعات والجرائم التي ارتكبوها خلال مرحلة الاحتلال الصهيوني للجنوب، ومنع الانتقام منهم، وذلك حرصاً على حماية الوحدة الوطنية في المناطق المحررة، وقطع الطريق على الفتنة التي سعى إليها العدو لتعكير وإجهاض الانتصار الاستراتيجي والتاريخي الذي حققته المقاومة بإلحاق الهزيمة بجيش الاحتلال الصهيوني.. كما أنّ حزب الله اعتصم بالصبر، المنقطع النظير، في مواجهة الهجمات الشرسة والاتهامات الملفقة التي تعرّض لها، والاعتداءات استهدفت انصاره، اثر حصول جريمة اغتيال الرئيس رفيق الحريري، وذلك لمنع الفتنة المذهبية…

فهل من ينتهج مثل هذه السياسة لمنع الفتنة، ويحرص الوحدة الوطنية والسلم الأهلي، يمكن أن يقف وراء جريمة يعرف جيداً انها تخدم أعداء المقاومة، الذين يتربّصون شراً بها، وينتظرون استغلال أيّ حادث، صغيراً كان أم كبيراً، للنيل من صورة وسمعة المقاومة النبيلة، التي هزمت العدوين الصهيوني والإرهابي ورفعت رأس لبنان عالياً، وحمت الأمن والاستقرار ومكّنت الدولة وأجهزتها من استعادة سلطتها على المناطق المحررة…

3

ـ انّ الواجب الوطني يقتضي من كلّ حريص على التصدي للفتنة وعدم الوقوع في فخ التحريض الأميركي على حزب الله المقاوم.. أن يتصدى لهذا المخطط، بأن يربط بين إدانة اغتيال لقمان سليم، ومطالبة الجهات الأمنية والقضائية بإجراء التحقيقات المطلوبة لكشف ملابسات الجريمة ومعرفة منفذيها واعتقالهم والجهات التي تقف وراءهم… وفي نفس الوقت يعمل على إدانة وفضح أهداف الحملة الملفقة التي تنظمها قوى سياسية ومجموعات «الانجيؤز» ضدّ حزب الله المقاوم، والتي سارعت إلى استغلال الجريمة وتوجيه الاتهام له، وتحريض اللبنانيين ضدّه.. في محاولة مكشوفة لاستعادة بعض الوهج لدورها المشبوه، بعد فشلها في تحقيق أحلام واشنطن بإنجاز انقلاب سياسي على السلطة لمحاصرة وعزل حزب الله والعمل على نزع سلاح مقاومته، رغم إنفاق المليارات على دعم هذه المجموعات وغيرها من القوى السياسية التابعة.. وهو ما عرّضها لانتقادات قاسية وجّهها لها المسؤول الأميركي السابق ديفيد شينكر خلال اجتماع مع ممثليها في بيروت…

فيديوات ذات صلة

مقالات ذات صلة

آبار الغاز اللبنانيّة في رعاية الله والصواريخ

د. وفيق إبراهيم

تمارسُ فئات لبنانية تقليدية من أهل السياسة والإعلام تشكيكاً بالاتفاق الذي أعلن عنه رئيس المجلس النيابي نبيه بري مع الأميركيين للبدء بمفاوضات لترسيم حدود لبنان البحريّة مع الكيان الاسرائيلي.

هذه الفئات تفسّر هذا التطوّر بأنه استسلام لضغوط اميركية اقتصادية شديدة القسوة على لبنان، الذي يشهد بدوره انهياراً اقتصادياً لا يقلّ قسوة ومأساويّة.

فتعتبر أن هذا الاستسلام هو اذاً محصلة “سيناريو” متفقٍ عليه بين ثلاثة اطراف داخليين: رئيس المجلس نبيه بري الذي له الحق بالإعلان عن الاتفاق، والرئيس ميشال عون الذي يمثل الدولة اللبنانية والفريق المسيحي الأكثر قوة في البلاد وهو صاحب الحق الحصري بتشكيل وفد للمفاوضات بالاتفاق مع حكومة حسان دياب التي لا تزال تؤدي دوراً في ادارة الاعمال الحكومية.

يتبقى حزب الله، فتقول تلك الفئات المشككة إنه انكفأ بتعمد عن الصورة الإعلامية حتى لا يبدو منهزماً، فهناك انهيار اقتصادي لبناني أدرك حالة جوع تستشري في اوساط الطبقتين الوسطى والفقيرة، واذا اعترض الحزب على عملية الترسيم فإن تذمراً شعبياً كبيراً قابلاً للتراكم على شكل احتجاجات واسعة على منع عمليات ترسيم الحدود قد تنال من شعبية الحزب حتى بين الفئات الأقرب اليه. الأمر الذي لجم أي ردود علنية منه على اتفاق إطار الترسيم، ذاهباً عن الغياب المتعمّد وصولاً الى حدود التجاهل.

بالمقابل بدأ الإعلام المضاد بتصوير الاتفاق على انه إذعان من الحزب الى حدود المطالبة بإلغاء دوره في مجابهة “اسرائيل”.

يكفي أن واحدة من كبريات الصحف اللبنانية نشرت في المانشيت الأساسي لصفحتها الأولى، عنواناً ساخراً يقول انه “اتفاق تاريخي على مفاوضات في زمن الانهيار”.

بالإضافة الى عشرات الصحف اليومية الأخرى، هناك ثلاث محطات تلفزة شديدة الصلة بالمشاهدين (الجديد- أم تي في – أل بي سي) لا تنفك منذ ثلاثة أيام في الربط بين الانهيار الاقتصادي والاستسلام للضغوط الأميركية – الإسرائيلية مع التعريج بخفة على انكفاء ما لحزب الله.

لا بدّ أولاً من تأكيد أن هذه الفئات اللبنانية السياسية والإعلامية تؤدي هذا الدور التشكيكي منذ إعلان تشكيل الدولة 1943، فلا تؤمن إلا بأهمية السياسات الغربية وتوالي محاورها بالانتقال من نفوذ فرنسي – بريطاني، أميركي حسب التوازنات وكادت لولا الضغوط الوطنية الداخلية تمارس تطبيعاً كاملاً مع “اسرائيل” وما منعها تاريخياً هي المقاومات الوطنية حتى الثمانينيات وجهادية حزب الله المفتوحة منذ 1982 حتى اليوم.

هي اذاً موازنات القوى التي ضبطت الانحرافات الداخلية، التي تختبئ خلف الانتماء اللبناني في معظم الأوقات ولا تتفلت عواطفها الجياشة نحو العدو الاسرائيلي إلا في مرحلة صعود النفوذ الأميركي – الإسرائيلي إقليمياً او عودته للعب في لبنان داخلياً.

يجب اذاً الربط بين الضغط الأميركي على لبنان والمبادرة الفرنسية وتهديدات “اسرائيل” وعودة الفئات المحسوبة عليها الى تصعيد سياسي وإعلامي وتحشيد طائفي ومذهبي وصل الى حدود تحريض رجال دين مسيحيين ومسلمين وتشكيل كتل سياسية تابعة لهم من نواب مستقلين وإعلاميين وسياسيين.

هذا يعني أنه لا يجوز ربط هذا التحريض الأميركي باستسلام ما لحلف المقاومة. بل بإعادة نصب قوى لبنانية موالية للغرب وتشهد حالياً انهياراً كبيراً.

لذلك فإن ما يمكن استنتاجه بشكل إضافي يتعلق بحاجة أميركية الى ترسيم بحري بين لبنان والكيان المحتل، لتحرير خط غاز بحري يجب أن يمر بموازاة آبار غاز لبنانية في البلوكين الثامن والتاسع.

وسبب هذه الحاجة وجود إصرار أميركي على نقل غاز تحالفها الإقليمي المتشكل من مصر و”اسرائيل” واليونان وقبرص والأردن وايطاليا والسلطة الفلسطينية التي لم توقع حتى الآن على الاتفاق النهائي، وفرنسا المرشحة للانضمام.

هناك اذاً حاجة اميركية لتنظيم توريد هذا الغاز الشرق أوسطي لمنافسة الغاز الروسي. وهذا لا يمكن ان يحدث مع وجود خلاف لبناني – إسرائيلي على نحو 860 كيلومتراً من اعماق الحدود البحرية.

والأميركيون متأكدون أن تمرير الانابيب الاسرائيلية مسألة مستحيلة من دون تراجع “اسرائيل” عن مطامعها في آبار لبنان، وذلك لان صواريخ حزب الله تقف لها بالمرصاد ولن تسمح للكيان الإسرائيلي وتحالفاته العربية بتمرير الغاز الخاص بها على مقربة من بحر لبنان من دون الاعتراف بلبنانية 860 كيلومتراً مربعاً وبدء لبنان التنقيب عن الغاز الخاص به.

هذا هو دور صواريخ حزب الله الحامية للأرض والبحر والإنسان والثروات من الطاقة وخلافها.

يكفي هنا أن تنظر هذه الفئات كيف سطت “اسرائيل” على الغاز في سيناء المصرية وبعض انحاء فلسطين والجولان السوري حتى تتبين أهمية صواريخ الحزب في تأمين الاستقرار الوطني اللبناني بأبعاده الشعبية والسياسية والاقتصادية، وما على الجميع إلا انتظار بدء المفاوضات لكي يتأكدوا أن لبنان بعناية الله وصواريخ حزبه.

Nasrallah denies any Hezbollah activities at the port, calls to end incitment and impunity (full speech)


Date: 8 August 2020

Author: lecridespeuples

Source: https://video.moqawama.org/details.php?cid=1&linkid=2148

Translation: resistancenews.org

Key points:

  • The tragic context requires a sacred union, in order to overcome the humanitarian crisis, and not to settle political accounts; Hezbollah has mobilized all its resources to help the victims
  • All the accusations claiming Hezbollah is somewhat responsible are outrageous, because Hezbollah has never had any activity, no warehouse and no role or control over what goes on in the port; this slanders constitutes an incitement to civil war
  • At this stage of the investigation, no hypothesis can be ruled out as to the intentional or accidental nature of the explosion, but criminal negligence seems to be proven in all cases.
  • An impartial investigation must identify and severely punish all the culprits, and break with the traditional sectarianism of the judicial system which judges people according to their political and religious affiliation; without a fair & transparent trial and full accountability, Lebanon will always be a failed State
  • The Lebanese army is the body most able to carry out this investigation, and all the calls to form an international commission of inquiry are only delaying tactics aimed at perpetuating the establishment and impunity.
  • Lebanon must use the current opportunities to overcome the US embargo and revive its economy
  • All those who hope to weaken Hezbollah through this crisis demonstrate their moral bankruptcy and lack of lucidity

Transcription:

Prior to this terrible event, I had announced a speech for Wednesday (August 5), and I intended to speak about several issues which were the hottest news at the time, namely:

– the situation on the border between Lebanon and occupied Palestine, and the ongoing clash between Hezbollah and the Israeli enemy;

– the Special Tribunal for Lebanon (and the expected verdict) on August 7 (concerning the assassination of Rafik Hariri in 2005);

– the coronavirus, its development and the recent increase of cases in Lebanon;

– the oil shortages and the gasoline crisis in the country;

– other questions related to the regional situation.

But when the catastrophic event happened on Tuesday (August 4), I decided to postpone my speech, and today I am not going to bring up any of these topics, but only talk about one point, namely the cataclysmic event that occurred (in the port of Beirut) and the humanitarian crisis that engulfed Lebanon and the Lebanese people in recent days.

[A major and unprecedented cataclysm]

Regarding the event itself, first of all, we are faced with a colossal incident, a great tragedy, be it from a humanitarian or national perspective, or by any (other) criteria. There are more than 150 martyrs, the vast majority being Lebanese. Notably, there are a large number of Syrian martyrs, and martyrs of various nationalities. There are thousands of injured. The latest figures speak of nearly 80 missing people. As a precaution, let’s talk about dozens of missing people. There are tens of thousands of families who had to leave their homes damaged (and rendered uninhabitable) by the explosion. Thousands and even tens of thousands of people have lost their property, their source of livelihood, their business. (Not to mention) the state of fear and even terror that has indeed struck the hearts of millions of people, and not hundreds of thousands of people, for the inhabitants of Beirut and its suburbs make up almost half of the population of Lebanon, if not more [Lebanon’s population is almost 7 million]. The buildings were shaken to the point that people believed there was a huge earthquake, and each neighborhood felt like the explosion was happening in its own neighborhood. What people have experienced in terms of fear and worry, be it men, women or children (is indescribable).

Of course, the consequences of all of this are huge and very dangerous, as are the (apocalypse) scenes we have all seen. We are facing an event which has considerable consequences on the humanitarian, economic, health and social levels. Concretely, the port of Beirut was almost completely destroyed, which implies a necessary reconstruction of the port, with economic repercussions which are added to the serious financial and social crisis which the country was already going through. In short, at all levels, we are facing a major cataclysm.

I extend my sincere condolences to all the families of martyrs… One thing should be stressed: you know that Lebanon, in general, is divided along sectarian and regional lines, and that a region can be affected (by a problem) without affecting another. But this explosion has crossed sectarian and regional lines: there are martyrs and wounded from all sects, and all the neighborhoods & regions (of the capital) have been affected. Beirut is the city of all Lebanese, and embraces all Lebanese. The inhabitants of Beirut are a microcosm of all Lebanese people, in their different regional, religious and sectarian affiliations. This tragedy made no distinction.

I therefore extend my sincere condolences to all the families of martyrs, and I ask God the Most High and the Exalted to inspire them with patience and endurance in the face of the loss of their loved ones, and I also ask Him to grant a speedy recovery to all the injured and to all those who have been affected (in one way or another). I ask God the Most High and the Exalted to inspire them all with the patience and the ability to bear and endure (this tragedy), and to grant the determination (required) to overcome this terrible ordeal to all those who have been affected, whether in their relatives, homes, livelihoods or property, or who have been displaced from their homes. I ask Him to give them the patience, endurance and mutual assistance (required) to overcome this tragedy. Of course, this requires the Grace of God the Most High and the Exalted, and the cooperation, effort and sacrifice of all.

By this brief description, I wanted to indicate that we are facing an exceptional event, at least in the modern history of Lebanon, which requires exceptional behavior at all levels, whether at the psychological level, at the level of action on the ground, at the media, political and judicial levels: all measures must be strong and exceptional because of the major and unprecedented nature of this event.

Of course, man is unable to express (as it should) his feelings in front of our people, our beloved ones in Beirut and its suburbs, in all the districts of Beirut and its suburbs, and put into words the suffering, sadness, sorrow (that we feel), as well as our solidarity and our presence by their side, and our (sense of) common responsibility.

Likewise, in the face of this event and its consequences, and I will now turn to the other points, we were able to see several things in Lebanon. I want to talk about each scene, comment on it and take a stance.

[The sacred union of the Lebanese people and their institutions]

First, the popular scene alongside the State. Since the first hours, very naturally, the departments concerned, the security, military and health authorities, civil defense, emergency services, firefighters, all have been on the ground, but what is remarkable is the popular atmosphere, the ardor of the people in all regions, this rapid presence of many civil and popular groups and associations, whether they are firefighters, ambulance workers, rescue organizations, volunteers, in order to help the State authorities, because this situation exceeded the capacities of the State, whether it be hospitals, doctors, nurses, blood donations… It is perhaps the first time that Hezbollah officially appealed for blood donation, and thank goodness all the required blood was obtained, even though the number of injured was huge from the start.

This atmosphere of compassion & popular responsiveness has also continued in the clearing of debris, the cleaning of streets, houses and squares, and we still see a massive presence of volunteers in these squares. A (large) number of municipalities and communities, religious associations and political forces, families and houses have announced their willingness to guarantee housing for those who have lost their homes, whether it is temporary damage or total destruction. Despite all the financial and social crises that the country is going through, we have seen such a level of compassion and solidarity. Of course, we also have to consider the psychological and emotional side that has reached a high level of excellence, namely this (massive) ardor, this sadness, this compassion. At the popular level, we do not see abuse or indifference, everyone feels concerned, everyone is affected. These are the emotions of the inhabitants. We must give this scene (of popular solidarity) a very high grade, at the level of civilization, humanity, ethics, nation, emotions. It is evidence of the conscience, life, soul, culture, ethics and humanitarian and national feeling of our people in all regions, in all sects and in all places.

[Total mobilization of Hezbollah to rescue and relocate the victims]

Of course, as far as Hezbollah is concerned in this regard, from the first moments, the presence of our bodies, our associations, our members and our popular base, the municipalities and communities in which we are represented or present, I considers that they did not spare any effort, and that they were present (massively). And today, I confirm once again that Hezbollah, at the level of all its bodies, associations and staff, and of all our human and material resources, we are entirely at the service of the Lebanese State and the Lebanese government, and of the relevant ministries, and we are available to all our people and all our fellow citizens who have been affected by this tragedy.

Of course, I want to stress our relocation project for disaster victims, because we have had a lot of experience in this regard since the 2006 war, and I hope people will take it with due seriousness. And I confirm once again what the president of the community of municipalities of the southern suburbs of Beirut and various municipalities in Lebanon announced: any family who has lost their home, and who need time to clear or repair this home, and needs a temporary accommodation in the meantime, we are open, happy and ready to help these families through this project, with the Grace of God. It is not acceptable for a single family to remain on the streets, nor for them to feel like a burden on their relatives or friends who host them because they have requested them. Temporary housing can be provided until further notice, in order to give them time to return home as soon as possible, when their homes have been repaired and cleared.

[Exceptional international solidarity despite US sanctions]

The second scene was abroad, namely the positions of many States and governments in the world, of the great religious authorities in the world, Muslims and Christians, Sunnis and Shiites, political forces, Resistance movements, leaders, scholars, elites, media, parties, etc. Lebanon and the Lebanese people have been the object of great compassion internationally, and many countries have announced their readiness to provide assistance, while we are under siege: the United States has clearly announced that they were not going to besiege a group or a party, as some try to claim, but all of Lebanon. If only they were content to besiege only one party or group! This is what we have been asking for from the start! You have a problem with us (Hezbollah), so besiege us, and only us, without chastising and making a whole country and a people pay the price!

Anyway, we thank all the countries that sent us aid, all the friends and brothers, Arab, Islamic and other countries, the whole international community. Some have announced that they will help us, and we hope they will keep their word (without fear of US sanctions). Likewise, delegations & ministers from various countries came, and the most visible was the visit of the French President to Lebanon. We positively view any help and compassion with Lebanon, and any visit to Lebanon in these days, especially if it is part of aid to Lebanon, or a call for cooperation and dialogue between Lebanese. We look at this kind of visit (in a positive way). We want to focus on the positive side. Perhaps some call for vigilance and concern (over the hidden motives of these visits), and express fears (of interference which may be legitimate), but at the present stage we prefer to consider this kind of visit in its positive aspect and focus on the positive side, (at least) for the time being. [Note: the section of the speech concerning France was read verbatim by Nasrallah on a statement prepared in advance, while for the rest of his speech he spoke spontaneously and had only prepared notes; this reflects Hezbollah’s mistrust and lucidity in the face of Macron’s initiative and outrageous statements of interference, which he prefers not to comment on for the time being in order to remain in a perspective of sacred union; it should be noted that the main politicians behind the explosion appear to be France’s closest friends, namely the Hariri clique.]

Therefore, this external and international scene was on the whole positive, and was full of compassion, and I consider that this opens an opportunity for Lebanon, as a State and as a people —I will come back to this in conclusion— to get help, and open a way out in the face of the state of siege and the difficulties that Lebanon was going through recently.

[The moral bankruptcy of Hezbollah’s opponents]

The first and second scenes are therefore positive, but the third scene (which I want to evoke) is the internal Lebanese political scene, and certain external elements. In general, it is said that dignified peoples, who have a certain level of culture and ethics, a certain sense of responsibility and humanity, a sense of national interest, even when there are struggles and disputes among themselves, when a great national tragedy occurs, or a terrible event occurs, everyone temporarily freezes their struggles and disputes, as well as their personal calculations, to rise above all these (partisan) considerations, and to behave on a nobler ethical and human basis, and everyone helps each other to overcome this tragedy or this catastrophe. Once the crisis is over, things can resume their usual course. Things are like this (in general) all over the world.

Sometimes we have even seen that in the midst of war, when a tragic event such as a massacre occurs, the enemies conclude a truce, a ceasefire, even in the midst of war! It does happen and it is well known (even against Israel), but I will not waste time citing examples. But outside of war, within the same country, where there is a government, an opposition, rival political forces, when a catastrophe affects everyone, all regions, all families. What happened was not a tragedy that only targeted certain categories of the population, no. In general, in such situations (of national disaster), differences are temporarily put aside, and everyone helps and cooperates (even with their political opponents), and adopts more dignified language, with different sentiments, and different statements and political speeches. Likewise, the media behave differently, with humanity and ethics, each granting a respite (to their adversaries), if only for a few days, at least a few days (of truce)! I’m not talking about months or years, no, a few days, (one or) two weeks! To give people time to recover the remains of their martyrs, to heal their wounds, to visit the wounded, to assert the fate of the missing people, to put out the fires, to clear the debris, to find a way to relocate the displaced, etc. After that, we can reopen the accounts (and rekindle the rivalries), no problem.

[A cabal of calumnies]

But unfortunately what happened in Lebanon with this incident is that from the first hours of this tragedy and this cataclysm, and even from the first hour, not the first hours, when no one yet knew what was going on or had happened… In the first moments, people spoke of an earthquake, and it was only later that it was established that it was an explosion . (We still had to determine) what type of explosion it was, where in the port it had taken place, what had exploded, what was in the hangar that exploded, how did the explosion happen, was it an accident or an intentional act, etc. Even before anyone knew the answer to these questions, the Lebanese and Arab media, and certain political forces expressed through their official social networks, and even through some public statements by officials… These are not from obscure people running (Twitter or Facebook) accounts, but statements on television and in the media, made as soon as the explosion was known to the public, and while the fires in the port were not yet extinguished, and the destruction and amazement was the lot of all the Lebanese and the whole world. But these people spoke out in the media and announced their position before they knew anything. Their position was decided in advance: the cause of the explosion in hangar number so-and-so at the port of Beirut was a Hezbollah missile warehouse that exploded and caused this unprecedented terror and cataclysm. Or, they said it was stockpiles of Hezbollah ammunition, explosives, or weapons. The bottom line is that it must have belonged to Hezbollah, whether it was missiles, ammunition, explosives … And then, even when the official authorities announced that it was not missiles, weapons, ammunition, explosives or anything like that, but (ammonium) nitrate used as a fertilizer or an explosive, these people said that this nitrate belonged to Hezbollah, that it was the Hezbollah that brought it, that it was Hezbollah that stored it for 6 years, and again Hezbollah, Hezbollah, Hezbollah.

Without even knowing whether this explosion was criminal or accidental, whether it was an accident due to fire or otherwise, or whether it was an attack, or, as some have claimed, an air attack, missile or whatever, none of that interested these people at all. Accident or crime, missile, drone, fire, etc., they didn’t care. The important thing was to affirm that this hangar belonged to Hezbollah. Why? So that they could tell the Lebanese people, the inhabitants of Beirut, the inhabitants of the suburbs of Beirut, to all the Lebanese, that the one who had destroyed their houses, killed their children and their relatives, destroyed their port, their livelihood and their property, had injured thousands of you and terrorized you, it was Hezbollah, Hezbollah was responsible for everything.

Of course, this is a huge injustice done to us, a crime, and I don’t know if this can be seen as falling within the scope of free speech, freedom of the press (or rather defamation and incitement to hatred and violence). These questions need to be debated. At the moment… Let me talk a little about our feelings. We are among the killed and injured. Among the martyrs and the wounded, there are our relatives, our supporters, Hezbollah members. All these people have a job, they are workers, they have cars, they gave first aid (many firefighters and rescuers died), etc. Likewise, our feelings extend to all of our people, not just those who support Hezbollah. We are filled with sincere friendship for all Lebanese, and we are very moved by what happened. While in the throes of tragedy, we endured on top of that the suffering of oppression (these slanderous accusations). Some have told me it is not worth talking about. No. I have to talk about it, for sure! For the degree of oppression (constituted by these gratuitous attacks) is exceptional: just as the event is exceptional, the oppression inflicted on us is unprecedented. Even before an investigation was launched, before anyone knew what happened, some media, some Lebanese and Arab TV channels, since the incident began and until now —they haven’t changed their tune— asserted that the hangar belonged to Hezbollah, that what exploded was Hezbollah missiles, Hezbollah explosives, Hezbollah nitrate, Hezbollah, Hezbollah, Hezbollah, Hezbollah… We heard nothing else from them, because there is no other (hypothesis) for them. It is a great crime committed against us. And their method has been to lie, lie, lie and lie and lie again, until people believe it. And it seems that some people, because of the pangs of tragedy and disaster, and the media hype (putting the blame on us), it is possible that it had an influence on some, although in general we rely on people’s awareness and lucidity, and their knowledge that these sources have no credibility, and have a whole history of lies, deception, inventions, falsifications and inversion of reality.

[Hezbollah has never had any activities or storage in the port]

Despite the fact that, as some of us have said, these accusations (are so ludicrous that they) do not deserve an answer, if there is anyone that can be affected by these allegations, perhaps some will say that Hezbollah has not made any statement or denial or comment, and out of respect for reasoned minds and public opinion, I would like to stress and confirm today: I deny in a firm, categorical, absolute, final, total and definite way that Hezbollah has absolutely nothing in the port. There is no weapons warehouse, no missile stock, not a single rocket, a single rifle, a single grenade, a single bullet, (a single drop) of nitrate, there is nothing of all this, neither in a hangar nor outside a hangar, neither now nor in the past, there is nothing and there never has been anything. Nothing at all. There is absolutely none of that. Either way, the results of the investigation will be known soon, and everything will be proven and demonstrated, because such things cannot be hidden. If the blast in the harbor was due to missiles, ammunition, weapons or anything military, the investigation will (infallibly) reveal it. As for nitrate, we already know where it came from, who brought it into the country, how many years it was stored there, etc. All of this will be established and confirmed by the investigation. I don’t need more than this brief denial, because all I care about is that no one would give credit to these lies and fabrications (because of Hezbollah’s silence), and to denounce this enormous oppression inflicted on Hezbollah and the Resistance in Lebanon.

Of course, some opted for another wave (of slanderous accusations) when they saw that the majority of local media, commentary and data (favored another direction)… Even Trump, for example, in the White House, walked in this direction at first, talking about a possible bomb, or whatever, but the United States backed out. I have seen yesterday and today that the majority of international media and journalists have abandoned the hypothesis (of a stockpile of Hezbollah weapons), except for a few voices in Lebanon and the Arab world. Thus, those who launched (this slander) are now all alone (to support it), because all the media and all the voices in the world are anxious to keep a minimum of credibility, even if they are our enemies engaged in a political war against us; but when it turns out that the accusation is clearly a lie as shiny as the sun at its zenith, they (have enough good sense to) back off and conjure up other possibilities.

[Hezbollah has no control over the port and has never interfered in its affairs]

Another thing some people have said is that Hezbollah controls the port of Beirut, run it and supervise it, and that nothing can happen in the port without us knowing it, seeing it and giving our consent, etc. These are also lies, deception, forgery and great injustice (against us). We don’t run the port, we don’t control it, we don’t oversee it, we don’t interfere in its management or affairs, and we had no idea what was going on in the port and what was (stored) in the port. Some objected: “Is it possible that you are more aware of what is in the port of Haifa (reference to the stocks of ammonia that Nasrallah threatened to target in the event of Israeli strikes on Lebanese infrastructure) than what is in the port of Beirut?” Of course! Hezbollah’s primary responsibility is resistance (against Israel), and it is normal that Hezbollah be more aware of the port of Haifa than of the port of Beirut, which is not our responsibility, while the port of Haifa is our responsibility, because it is part of the deterrence equation and the defense strategy of Lebanon. But Hezbollah does not rule, control, interfere or know anything about what is going on in the port of Beirut, what is there and what is not there, how things are managed, it is a matter that we ignore and in which we do not interfere at all. But anyway, we will continue to hear this (second) wave (of accusations), these (false) allegations, because if the hangar does not belong to Hezbollah, we must find something else to blame Hezbollah for the tragedy. Because as far as these oppressors are concerned, the important thing is to place one responsibility or another on Hezbollah, and to look for a pretext, an allegation, a lie, a forgery (which allows it). I’ll ay no more on this issue.

[Defamation and the incitment to civil war must be punished severely]

Either way, investigations are ongoing, and the truths will emerge quickly, as this is not a question that will take time. I believe that the criminal, security, military and technical investigation will be able to quickly establish (with certainty) what was in the hangar, what was the nature of the explosives and how it was triggered, because at the technical level, this does not require much time, and the truths can be expected to come to light quickly.

When the truths come to light, I hope that the Lebanese public opinion, in all regions of Lebanon, because in our country there is a problem in terms of punishments and responsibilities, and in the name of freedom of opinion and expression, some (media and politicians) accuse, insult, abuse, oppress and lead the country to the brink of civil war, and (despite all this), ultimately, the Criminal Court imposes them a (mere) fine of 10 to 50 million Lebanese pounds (6,000 to 35,000 dollars), and it stops there. What I want to ask the Lebanese people is that they should themselves judge these media (and politicians) and condemn them. In what way? By ceasing to give them the least credit, the least importance, and by ceasing to consult them or to look at them. Because when we know that such media has no credibility, and that it is based on lies, manipulation and falsification, and that it participates in the battle that targets our country (to destroy it), then we must condemn them and turn our backs on them for good. And it is in my opinion the most important punishment (that can befall) these false and falsifying television stations which push to the civil war. This should not be taken lightly! This is not a (simple) political accusation. When somebody comes and tells hundreds of thousands of people that it is Hezbollah who is responsible for this carnage, all these deaths and injuries, all this destruction and all this displacement, what is it (if not pushing the country towards civil war)?

[A political instrumentalisation of the crisis]

On the other hand, still concerning the political scene, on the other hand we saw the political instrumentalisation of the incident, and all those who had a problem with so and so reopened this problem (in this tragic context), whether it is the Lebanese National Pact, the government or other political forces, and of course those who have a problem with us. Today, I do not want to open an argument with anyone, and we are putting off (the settling of accounts) for later because we remain attached to avoid settling political or personal disputes, out of ethical, humanitarian and national considerations. This is the time for solidarity, compassion, mutual aid, to heal wounds, to clear debris, to determine the fate of the missing, to treat the wounded, to help people return home, which is a vital priority. The country needs this kind of attitude and calm for several days in order to overcome the crisis. Then we can talk politics and settle accounts. Our position will be firm. And as for certain analyzes which compare the current situation with previous experiences (assassination of Hariri in 2005, etc.) or build hopes (on capitalizing on this tragedy for political gains) like so many of their past illusions, (remember that) for a long time, some people (Hezbollah adversaries) chased after mirages, only to realize that they were all mirages, but I will talk about that later. At this point, I don’t want to get into these considerations, and I don’t want to attack anyone. I’ll put it off until later. The priority is compassion, cooperation and mutual aid, to overcome these days of pain, suffering and humanitarian crisis. Let’s put all the differences aside and get back to political (disputes) later.

[Impartial investigation and exemplary punishment for all those responsible are essential to save Lebanon]

My last point, which is most important, is investigation and retribution. A huge, terrible and dangerous event has happened. First, there must be an investigation. His Excellency the President of the Republic and the Prime Minister declared from the outset that there will be an impartial, resolute, firm, definitive and strong investigation, and that whoever will be identified as having a responsibility in this incident, by his actions or by negligence, corruption or insufficiency, will be held to account, whoever he is, big or small. Very well. It’s a good start. The Lebanese are now asking for action and effort (in this direction). I consider that faced with the shock of the event, there is national, popular and governmental unanimity, of all political parties and all deputies, etc., demanding that an exhaustive, frank, transparent, precise, fair and impartial investigation be carried out on this event, and that whoever bears any share of responsibility be judged and condemned in the most severe and exemplary manner —a fair punishment, of course (not a lynching). We are also among the voices that demand this loud and clear. We must not allow anyone to be covered or protected during the investigation, and truths to be withheld about anyone. It is not tolerable that the investigation and then the trial should be done in the “Lebanese fashion”, that is to say in this well-known way where one takes into account religious and sectarian calculations and balances. Anyone who was inadequate or negligent, instigated (this event) or engaged in corruption, has no religion or sect, as is the case with collaborators (of the Israeli enemy). They should be judged on the basis of what they have done, not on the basis of their sectarian, religious or political affiliation. Neither the investigation nor the trial should be conducted on a sectarian basis (requiring a precise ratio of Sunnis, Shiites or Christians). Whoever is in charge, whether they belong to several sects or are all from the same sect, whatever their political affiliation and group, whatever their family clan, truth and justice must prevail and determine the position, the investigation and the punishment.

[The investigation must be carried out by the Lebanese army, the only institution with unanimous support]

Likewise, with regard to the investigation, one hears calls, opinions and thoughts. I want to address certain political forces who are talking about the question of the investigation (and asking that it be done by international bodies, like Macron did). The official security authorities are quite capable of carrying out this investigation: they have the technical capacity and the required expertise, that is certain. But you have doubts about their reliability (and impartiality). I ask you a question: because sometimes, political settling of accounts (are flagrant), and the thread of lies is short. All the political forces in Lebanon affirm their confidence in the Lebanese army, the national institution (par excellence), guarantor of stability and security in the country, guarantor of sovereignty. We have heard many poetic praises to the glory of the Lebanese National Army. Very well. So let the Lebanese army take care of the investigation. I believe that the services of the Lebanese army have already been requested, the military police it seems to me. If the Lebanese army is an institution that enjoys the confidence of all Lebanese people, all Lebanese political forces and all Lebanese leaders, let us entrust it with the task of carrying out the investigation, since you say you trust it! At least let the Army do the investigation, since you trust them! Let them investigate and reveal the findings, so that everyone can see them.

There is yet another choice. Maybe some Lebanese have confidence in one body, but not in another. It’s possible. So let’s form a plural investigative committee, where each security body which you trust will be present, even if in my opinion charging the army is sufficient, independently of the other bodies which can have the trust of some but not of others. Everyone says there is unanimity around the Army, so let the Army investigate! Let the military conduct the investigation, and let them announce its findings to all people, not just the courts, on their own responsibility. Let them declare that they, the Lebanese army, with their expertise, their capacities and their means, carried out an impartial and transparent investigation, and these are their conclusions, O Lebanese people, concerning the explosion which took place in the Port of Beirut. This will suffice to manifest the truth for all to see.

[Lebanon’s survival as a genuine State is at stake]

In this regard, I would also like to add something very important. Just as the event is exceptional, today the attitude of the Lebanese State towards this event will be in our eyes decisive and fateful. This will determine the future of Lebanon. In what way? Today it is not about the President of the Republic, the National Pact or the government (which can come and go at the whim of elections and crises). It is about (the safeguard of) the Lebanese State, (which will depend) on the way in which the authorities will behave in this regard, be it the judicial body, the army, the security services, and even the Chamber of Deputies. It is about (the sustainability) of the (Lebanese) State and its institutions. Everyone has some responsibility for the trial and the punishment. The way to act in the face of such a catastrophe, which has affected all sects, all neighborhoods and all regions, and must in no way be tinged with sectarianism, religion or politicization, a national and humanitarian tragedy par excellence, the way State institutions will behave about it, as well as political leaders and the various political forces in the country, will have a fateful consequence for the whole country. What will this fateful consequence be? How this tragedy is dealt with will determine in the eyes of the Lebanese people —and in my eyes the verdict will be irrevocable— whether there is a (genuine) State in Lebanon or not. The second question (which will find an irrevocable answer) is about the hope of building a State (in Lebanon). Because I tell you quite frankly: if the Lebanese State and the Lebanese political forces —whether in power or in the opposition—, in such a case and such a cause, do not achieve a result in the investigation, and fail to punish (all those responsible), it means that the Lebanese people, political forces, State institutions (are bankrupt), and that there is no hope to build an (authentic) State. I don’t want anybody to despair, but I accurately describe the reality.

But we must (all) work so that this despair does not happen, in order to confirm, create and sow hope (to see a real State) among the Lebanese. Today, all the calls to fight against corruption that may have denounced a biased judge, a cowardly judge, a force that buried court files for such or such consideration, (are eclipsed by the magnitude of this case). We have to see a heavy punishment, because even if the investigation reveals that it was an intentional act or an aerial bombardment, the fact that this nitrate was stored in this way for 6 or 7 years clearly implies that there was a (criminal) negligence, inadequacy and corruption on the part of judges. This is where the war on corruption must (be a priority)! If in this case all those who call for a war on corruption, and we are part of it, if we are unable to do anything (to identify and punish all the culprits), it means that we are unable to do anything (forever). Game over. We will frankly declare to the Lebanese people that it is impossible to fight corruption, to fight neglect and insufficiency, and we will say, “O Lebanese people, you have no State and there is no hope of building an (authentic) State, so it’s up to you to see what you can do with yourselves”. To me, such is the magnitude of the question. So that people do not say later that it was a tragedy (without culprits) and forget about the matter, we make it clear that as far as we are concerned, it is impossible to forget this disaster, to move on and to allow let it be neglected. The whole truth must be revealed about this tragedy, and those responsible must be tried without any protection, whether political, sectarian or partisan. If that doesn’t happen, yes, I will consider that there is a crisis of the regime, a crisis of the State, maybe even a crisis of the (Lebanese) entity, some will be entitled to go this far. And some people try to ignore it, one way or another.

Therefore, I call on State officials, at all levels and in all authorities, to show the utmost seriousness and determination, whether to complete the investigation or to judge and blame, and chastise all those responsible for this tragedy. This is required so that the leaders and the political forces can give hope to the Lebanese people that there are authorities, a State and institutions, or at least that there is hope that a State be erected on the basis of truth, justice, transparency and the protection of the Lebanese, because sometimes the consequences of corruption, negligence and incompetence accumulate and become apparent after several years, and can be destructive, like what happened in this terrible event where in seconds, in a matter of seconds, tens of people were killed or missing, thousands were injured, hundreds of thousands of families were affected and had to leave their homes… And some people say that God prevented an even greater tragedy, and that if this hangar had not been so close to the sea, and without such and such peculiarities of the site, if this same amount of nitrate had exploded in a different geographic configuration, perhaps the whole city (of Beirut) would have been destroyed. All this in an instant, in a matter of seconds, because of corruption, neglect and incompetence, and no one should say it is simply because of the intricacies of the bureaucracy. Never. We are talking about stocks that could completely destroy the capital and certain suburbs (in an instant). The blame cannot be blamed on the intricacies of bureaucracy.

[Lebanon must seize the opportunities of the crisis]

In conclusion —because I won’t be long today— I would like to finish with two points.

First point, in these days of tragedy, humanitarian catastrophe and sacrifice —because even today there have been sacrifices, martyrs, wounded, displaced persons, means of subsistence destroyed, an enormous weight added on the the Lebanese economy and the Lebanese State—, (we must not forget) that from the abyss of crises, from the matrix of crises, opportunities arise, whether they are internal, regional or international opportunities. The international attitude towards this event is an opportunity that the Lebanese must seize and take advantage of, both State and people, and they must not let these opportunities be lost because of their differences. We must seek out the opportunities that have been created by these crises and take advantage of them in a united manner and through cooperation.

[Hezbollah’s enemies must stop chasing mirages]

And the second and last point to conclude, is that I declare to all those who, from the first moment, launched a campaign against us, against the Resistance and against the Axis of Resistance, trying to take advantage of this tragedy, you will get nowhere, and I tell you that frankly and sincerely. I also declare to the masses (who support) the Resistance, and some of whom are perhaps worried, scared, wonder what is the (underlying) atmosphere, if this is a big regional or international plot , (I reassure them by reminding them) that the regional situation is very different (from what it was before), as is the international situation (much more favorable to us than ever). We are very different from what we were, and so is the (Axis of) the Resistance (we are stronger than ever), so there is really nothing to worry about (for us). These people (our adversaries) run after mirages, as they have always run after mirages. All of their choices have always been doomed to failure and defeat.

And I say this to our adversaries: just as you have been disappointed and defeated (in all your past undertakings: Special Tribunal for Lebanon, 2006 war, war in Syria, etc.), you will once again be disappointed and defeated. You will not achieve anything. This Resistance, by its credibility, its sincerity, by the confidence of the Lebanese people in it, by its (victorious) battles, by its positions, by its attitude and its behavior, and by its strength, its place in the country and in the region, is too large, too strong and too noble for it to be tainted by (the slanders) of certain oppressors, liars and falsifiers of the truth, who (constantly) incite sectarian rivalry, and who encourage civil war. They have always worked at this and have always failed, and they will fail again.

[Conclusion]

May God have mercy on the martyrs, and heal (promptly) the wounded, and I hope that by His Grace, the missing will be found alive; even if they are hurt God will heal them. May God grant patience and endurance to the families of the victims, as well as patience, relief and determination to all the families who have been affected and have suffered from this tragedy, be they our families in Beirut or in the suburbs of Beirut. With the Grace of God, through the mutual aid and solidarity of all, and the endurance of the State in its various institutions, as well as the efforts of political forces and the Lebanese people in its various categories, we will succeed in overcoming this ordeal and build a better tomorrow, and come out of it stronger and more resolute in our determination to persevere, endure and be victorious.

Peace be upon you, as well as the mercy of God and His blessings.

Donate as little as you can to support this work and subscribe to the Newsletter to get around censorship.

“Any amount counts, because a little money here and there, it’s like drops of water that can become rivers, seas or oceans…” Hassan Nasrallah

%d bloggers like this: